Guidance for Industry Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation, Final, July 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guidance for Industry Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation, Final, July 2009 Guidance for Industry Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) July 2009 Drug Safety Guidance for Industry Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation Additional copies are available from: Office of Communications, Division of Drug Information Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 Tel: 301-796-3400; Fax: 301-847-8714; E-mail: [email protected] http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development, HFM-40 Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-1448 Tel: 800-835-4709 or 301-827-1800 http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) July 2009 Drug Safety TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND: DILI ................................................................................................... 2 III. SIGNALS OF DILI AND HY’S LAW............................................................................ 3 IV. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF DILI ............................................................................ 7 A. General Considerations.................................................................................................................7 1. Patients with Liver Abnormalities or Disease .................................................................................7 2. Detection of DILI .............................................................................................................................8 3. Confirmation....................................................................................................................................8 4. Close Observation............................................................................................................................9 5. Decision to Stop Drug Administration.............................................................................................9 6. Evaluating Data for Alternative Causes ........................................................................................10 7. Follow-Up to Resolution................................................................................................................11 8. Rechallenge....................................................................................................................................12 B. Research Opportunities...............................................................................................................12 C. Case Report Forms ......................................................................................................................13 D. Interpretation of Signals of DILI or Acute Liver Failure ........................................................14 1. Frequency and Magnitude of Liver AT Abnormalities ..................................................................14 2. Combined Elevations of Aminotransferases and Bilirubin............................................................14 E. Analysis of Signals of DILI..........................................................................................................15 1. Assessment of Drug Metabolism....................................................................................................15 2. Assessment of Liver-Related Adverse Events in Controlled Trials................................................15 3. Assessment of Liver-Related Adverse Events in the Entire Clinical Trials Database ...................16 4. Assessment of Hy’s Law Cases in the Clinical Trials Database....................................................16 5. Overall Assessment of a Drug’s Potential to Cause DILI .............................................................17 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 19 APPENDIX A: ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES OF DILI..................................................... 23 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Guidance for Industry1 Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance. I. INTRODUCTION This guidance is intended to assist the pharmaceutical industry and other investigators who are conducting new drug development in assessing the potential for a drug2 to cause severe liver injury (i.e., irreversible liver failure that is fatal or requires liver transplantation). In particular, the guidance addresses how laboratory measurements that signal the potential for such drug- induced liver injury (DILI) can be obtained and evaluated during drug development. This evaluation is important because most drugs that cause severe DILI do so infrequently; typical drug development databases with up to a few thousand subjects exposed to a new drug will not show any cases. Databases may, however, show evidence or signals of a drug’s potential for severe DILI if the clinical and laboratory data are properly evaluated for evidence of lesser injury that may not be severe, but may predict the ability to cause more severe injuries. This guidance describes an approach that can be used to distinguish signals of DILI that identify drugs likely to cause severe liver injury from signals that do not suggest such a potential. This guidance does not address issues of preclinical evaluation for signals of DILI, nor the detection and assessment of DILI after drug approval and marketing. FDA’s guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are 1 This guidance has been prepared by the Division of Gastroenterology Products in the Office of New Drugs, the Office of Medical Policy, and the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) in cooperation with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2 This guidance uses the term drug or product to refer to all products, except whole blood and blood components, regulated by CDER and CBER, including vaccines, and uses the term approval to refer to both drug approval and biologic licensure. 1 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required. II. BACKGROUND: DILI DILI has been the most frequent single cause of safety-related drug marketing withdrawals for the past 50 years (e.g., iproniazid), continuing to the present (e.g., ticrynafen, benoxaprofen, bromfenac, troglitazone, nefazodone). Hepatotoxicity discovered after approval for marketing also has limited the use of many drugs, including isoniazid, labetalol, trovafloxacin, tolcapone, and felbamate (Temple 2001). Several drugs have not been approved in the United States because European marketing experience revealed their hepatotoxicity (e.g., ibufenac, perhexiline, alpidem). Finally, some drugs were not approved in the United States because premarketing experience provided evidence of the potential for severe DILI (e.g., dilevalol, tasosartan, ximelagatran). Although most significant hepatotoxins have caused predominantly hepatocellular injury, indicated by leakage of aminotransferase (AT) enzymes from injured liver cells without prominent evidence of hepatobiliary obstruction or intrahepatic cholestasis, the pattern of injury can vary. Many drugs cause cholestasis, but in general this condition is reversible after administration of the offending drug has stopped. Cholestatic injuries are less likely to lead to death or transplant, although there have been exceptions. Drugs cause liver injuries by many different mechanisms. These injuries resemble almost all known liver diseases and there are no pathognomonic findings, even upon liver biopsy, that make diagnosis of DILI certain. Therefore, when possible DILI is suspected, it is essential to gather additional clinical and laboratory information necessary for differential diagnosis of the cause. It is important to observe the time course of the injury, and to seek alternative causes of the liver injury, such as acute viral hepatitis A, B, or C; concomitant use of a hepatotoxic drug or exposure to hepatotoxins; autoimmune or alcoholic
Recommended publications
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,955,504 Wechter Et Al
    USOO5955504A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,955,504 Wechter et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 21, 1999 54 COLORECTAL CHEMOPROTECTIVE Marnett, “Aspirin and the Potential Role of Prostaglandins COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF in Colon Cancer, Cancer Research, 1992; 52:5575–89. PREVENTING COLORECTAL CANCER Welberg et al., “Proliferation Rate of Colonic Mucosa in Normal Subjects and Patients with Colonic Neoplasms: A 75 Inventors: William J. Wechter; John D. Refined Immunohistochemical Method.” J. Clin Pathol, McCracken, both of Redlands, Calif. 1990; 43:453-456. Thun et al., “Aspirin Use and Reduced Risk of Fatal Colon 73 Assignee: Loma Linda University Medical Cancer." N Engl J Med 1991; 325:1593-6. Center, Loma Linda, Calif. Peleg, et al., “Aspirin and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use and the Risk of Subsequent Colorectal Cancer.” 21 Appl. No.: 08/402,797 Arch Intern Med. 1994, 154:394–399. 22 Filed: Mar 13, 1995 Gridley, et al., “Incidence of Cancer among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis J. Natl Cancer Inst 1993 85:307-311. 51) Int. Cl. .......................... A61K 31/19; A61K 31/40; Labayle, et al., “Sulindac Causes Regression Of Rectal A61K 31/42 Polyps. In Familial Adenomatous Polyposis” Gastroenterol 52 U.S. Cl. .......................... 514/568; 514/569; 514/428; ogy 1991 101:635-639. 514/416; 514/375 Rigau, et al., “Effects Of Long-Term Sulindac Therapy On 58 Field of Search ..................................... 514/568, 570, Colonic Polyposis” Annals of Internal Medicine 1991 514/569, 428, 416, 375 11.5:952-954. Giardiello.et al., “Treatment Of Colonic and Rectal 56) References Cited Adenomas With Sulindac In Familial Adenomatous Poly U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PROZAC Product Monograph Page 1 of 49 Table of Contents
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrPROZAC® fluoxetine hydrochloride 10 mg and 20 mg Capsules Antidepressant / Antiobsessional / Antibulimic © Eli Lilly Canada Inc. Date of Revision: January, 25 Exchange Tower 2021 130 King Street West, Suite 900 PO Box 73 Toronto, Ontario M5X 1B1 1-888-545-5972 www.lilly.ca Submission Control No: 192639 PROZAC Product Monograph Page 1 of 49 Table of Contents PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .......................................................3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION...........................................................................3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ................................................................................3 CONTRAINDICATIONS .....................................................................................................4 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ....................................................................................5 ADVERSE REACTIONS ...................................................................................................13 DRUG INTERACTIONS....................................................................................................22 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................27 OVERDOSAGE..................................................................................................................28 ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ...............................................................30 STORAGE AND STABILITY............................................................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • The Myocardial Metabolic and Haemodynamic Effects of Perhexiline in I]Y Wvo and Nv Vitro Models
    THE MYOCARDIAL METABOLIC AND HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF PERHEXILINE IN I]Y WVO AND NV VITRO MODELS Steven Anthony Unger A Thesis submitted to The University of Adelaide as the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The Cardiology Unit, North.Western Adelaide Health Service Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide. September 2000 u TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ll Thesis Summary vlt Dcclaration ix Acknowledgments x CHAPTER 1: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF METABOLIC APPROACHES TO MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA I 1.1 INTRODUCTION 2 7.2 CHRONIC MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA 3 1.2.1 Epidemiology 3 1.2.2 Pathogenesis 4 1.3 CARDIAC METABOLISM 7 1.3.1 Overview offatty acid metabolism 8 1.3.1.1 Uptake and transport within the aqueous cytoplasm 8 1.3.1.2 Transport into mitochondria 9 1.3.1.3 B-oxidation l0 1.3.1.4 TCA cycle and electron transport chain 10 1.3.2 Regulation offatty acid metabolism 11 1.3.3 Oventiew of carbohydrate metabolism 13 1.3.4 Regulation of carbohydrate metabolism 14 ' L3.5 Substrate utilisation by the heart: the cost,in oxygen 16 1.3.6 Myocardial metabolism during ischaemia/reperfusion 18 1.3.7 The role offatty acid metabolites 22 1.4 MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA 24 1.4.1 Medical therapy 24 alaaìf:a--.--nÁ 1.4. i. i i\iüa[es L+ 1.4.1.2 B-adrenoceptor antagonists 25 lrl 1.4.1.3 L-t1pe calcium antagonists 25 1.4.2 Revascularisation 26 1.4.2.1 Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty 26 1.4.2.2 Coronary artery b¡pass surgery 28 I .4.2.3 Transmyocardial laser revascularisation 29 1.4.3 Limitations of current strategies 30 1.5 METABOLIC APPROACHES TO MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA 32 1.5.1 Increasing glucose supply to the heart 35 1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism and Management of Carbamazepine-Induced Hepatotoxicity
    Insights The Mechanism and Management of Carbamazepine-Induced Hepatotoxicity Lucy Rose Driver 2nd year Pharmacology BSc Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a frequently prescribed antiepileptic drug (AED), used in the treatment of epilepsy, neuropathic pain and psychiatric disorders. CBZ was the 176th most commonly prescribed medication in 2017 across the United States, with a total of 3,516,204 prescriptions written that year. CBZ is predominantly metabolised hepatically, subsequently increasing the risk of a CBZ-induced liver injury or CBZ-induced hepatotoxicity; with hepatotoxicity being defined as drug induced liver damage. Deviation beyond the therapeutic range of CBZ is consistent with toxicity, which combined with abnormal liver function tests, would be indicative of CBZ-induced hepatotoxicity. The liver is the leading organ for the maintenance of the body’s internal environment, therefore obstruction of the liver’s ability to conduct its regular function can carry a number of consequences. With a large number of patients receiving CBZ therapy worldwide, it is of absolute importance to understand the best clinical approach to the treatment of CBZ-induced hepatotoxicity. There have been a number of studies reviewing the type of liver damage that occurs in cases of hepatotoxicity, classified as either a hypersensitivity reaction or acute hepatitis, and how different methods of treatment specific to CBZ-induced hepatoxicity directly correlate with a successful outcome. Treatment of CBZ-induced hepatotoxicity can consist of recording serum levels of the drug whilst administering intravenous fluids and continuing CBZ therapy. A different approach would be that of primary gut decontamination with activated charcoal which has proven to be very effective, whilst various means of dialysis have been considered to have a limited ability to remove CBZ from the blood serum alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Hormonal Treatment Strategies Tailored to Non-Binary Transgender Individuals
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Hormonal Treatment Strategies Tailored to Non-Binary Transgender Individuals Carlotta Cocchetti 1, Jiska Ristori 1, Alessia Romani 1, Mario Maggi 2 and Alessandra Daphne Fisher 1,* 1 Andrology, Women’s Endocrinology and Gender Incongruence Unit, Florence University Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; [email protected] (C.C); jiska.ristori@unifi.it (J.R.); [email protected] (A.R.) 2 Department of Experimental, Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; [email protected]fi.it * Correspondence: fi[email protected] Received: 16 April 2020; Accepted: 18 May 2020; Published: 26 May 2020 Abstract: Introduction: To date no standardized hormonal treatment protocols for non-binary transgender individuals have been described in the literature and there is a lack of data regarding their efficacy and safety. Objectives: To suggest possible treatment strategies for non-binary transgender individuals with non-standardized requests and to emphasize the importance of a personalized clinical approach. Methods: A narrative review of pertinent literature on gender-affirming hormonal treatment in transgender persons was performed using PubMed. Results: New hormonal treatment regimens outside those reported in current guidelines should be considered for non-binary transgender individuals, in order to improve psychological well-being and quality of life. In the present review we suggested the use of hormonal and non-hormonal compounds, which—based on their mechanism of action—could be used in these cases depending on clients’ requests. Conclusion: Requests for an individualized hormonal treatment in non-binary transgender individuals represent a future challenge for professionals managing transgender health care. For each case, clinicians should balance the benefits and risks of a personalized non-standardized treatment, actively involving the person in decisions regarding hormonal treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Resident Abstracts
    2017 ACP Colorado Chapter Residents’ Meeting May 16, 2017 Saint Joseph Hospital, Denver, Colorado Broadmoor Hotel, Colorado Resident Abstracts Presented: May 16, 2017 2017 ACP Colorado Chapter Residents’ Meeting- May 16, 2017– Saint Joseph Hospital, Denver, Colorado Name: Jacob Ludwig, DO Presentation Type: Oral Presentation Residency Program: Saint Joseph Hospital Additional Authors: Abstract Title: Pharming Abstract Information: Case Study: YK is a 19 y/o female with intractable seizures who presented to the epilepsy-monitoring unit for further evaluation after failing to respond to antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. YK’s neurological issues began at 15 y/o, which included tremor, difficulty concentrating and episodic involuntary limb/torso movements. These movements progressed after starting high school often triggered by studying, focusing, reading or playing piano. At age 18, YK began complaining of worsening insomnia and depression, and her father began noticing focal seizures that would progress into generalized bilateral convulsions with loss of consciousness. YK’s father noted that the seizures often occurred around the 20th of every month despite increasing doses of Levetiracetam. At age 19, YK’s seizures became more frequent and she experienced worsening of symptoms that included colorful visual hallucinations. Her insomnia and depression were treated with amitriptyline and her AED medications were changed to Lamotrigine and Topiramate. But her seizures continued to be refractory despite increased AED doses. YK then presented to the epilepsy-monitoring unit for further work-up. Throughout the first day of monitoring, she suffered numerous brief seizures, periods of hemodynamic instability, and had a negative lamotrigine serum drug level. On hospital day 2 she had a prolonged seizure aborted with ativan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2D6 Substrates 2D6 Inhibitors 2D6 Inducers
    Physician Guidelines: Drugs Metabolized by Cytochrome P450’s 1 2D6 Substrates Acetaminophen Captopril Dextroamphetamine Fluphenazine Methoxyphenamine Paroxetine Tacrine Ajmaline Carteolol Dextromethorphan Fluvoxamine Metoclopramide Perhexiline Tamoxifen Alprenolol Carvedilol Diazinon Galantamine Metoprolol Perphenazine Tamsulosin Amiflamine Cevimeline Dihydrocodeine Guanoxan Mexiletine Phenacetin Thioridazine Amitriptyline Chloropromazine Diltiazem Haloperidol Mianserin Phenformin Timolol Amphetamine Chlorpheniramine Diprafenone Hydrocodone Minaprine Procainamide Tolterodine Amprenavir Chlorpyrifos Dolasetron Ibogaine Mirtazapine Promethazine Tradodone Aprindine Cinnarizine Donepezil Iloperidone Nefazodone Propafenone Tramadol Aripiprazole Citalopram Doxepin Imipramine Nifedipine Propranolol Trimipramine Atomoxetine Clomipramine Encainide Indoramin Nisoldipine Quanoxan Tropisetron Benztropine Clozapine Ethylmorphine Lidocaine Norcodeine Quetiapine Venlafaxine Bisoprolol Codeine Ezlopitant Loratidine Nortriptyline Ranitidine Verapamil Brofaramine Debrisoquine Flecainide Maprotline olanzapine Remoxipride Zotepine Bufuralol Delavirdine Flunarizine Mequitazine Ondansetron Risperidone Zuclopenthixol Bunitrolol Desipramine Fluoxetine Methadone Oxycodone Sertraline Butylamphetamine Dexfenfluramine Fluperlapine Methamphetamine Parathion Sparteine 2D6 Inhibitors Ajmaline Chlorpromazine Diphenhydramine Indinavir Mibefradil Pimozide Terfenadine Amiodarone Cimetidine Doxorubicin Lasoprazole Moclobemide Quinidine Thioridazine Amitriptyline Cisapride
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Apoptosis of Cells in Therapeutic Stem Cell Preparation Exert Immunomodulatory Effects Through Release of Phosphatidylserine
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy www.nature.com/sigtrans ARTICLE OPEN Spontaneous apoptosis of cells in therapeutic stem cell preparation exert immunomodulatory effects through release of phosphatidylserine Xuemei He1,2, Weiqi Hong 1, Jingyun Yang1, Hong Lei1, Tianqi Lu1, Cai He1, Zhenfei Bi1, Xiangyu Pan1, Yu Liu1, Lunzhi Dai 1, Wei Wang 1, Canhua Huang 1, Hongxin Deng1 and Xiawei Wei 1 Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-mediated immunomodulation has been harnessed for the treatment of human diseases, but its underlying mechanism has not been fully understood. Dead cells, including apoptotic cells have immunomodulatory properties. It has been repeatedly reported that the proportion of nonviable MSCs in a MSC therapeutic preparation varied from 5~50% in the ongoing clinical trials. It is conceivable that the nonviable cells in a MSC therapeutic preparation may play a role in the therapeutic effects of MSCs. We found that the MSC therapeutic preparation in the present study had about 5% dead MSCs (DMSCs), characterized by apoptotic cells. Namely, 1 × 106 MSCs in the preparation contained about 5 × 104 DMSCs. We found that the treatment with even 5 × 104 DMSCs alone had the equal therapeutic effects as with 1 × 106 MSCs. This protective effect of the dead MSCs alone was confirmed in four mouse models, including concanavalin A (ConA)- and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced acute liver injury, LPS-induced lung injury and spinal cord injury. We also found that the infused MSCs died by apoptosis in vivo. Furthermore, the therapeutic effect was attributed to the elevated level of phosphatidylserine (PS) upon the injection of MSCs or 1234567890();,: DMSCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Endocrine Drugs
    PharmacologyPharmacologyPharmacology DrugsDrugs thatthat AffectAffect thethe EndocrineEndocrine SystemSystem TopicsTopicsTopics •• Pituitary Pituitary DrugsDrugs •• Parathyroid/Thyroid Parathyroid/Thyroid DrugsDrugs •• Adrenal Adrenal DrugsDrugs •• Pancreatic Pancreatic DrugsDrugs •• Reproductive Reproductive DrugsDrugs •• Sexual Sexual BehaviorBehavior DrugsDrugs FunctionsFunctionsFunctions •• Regulation Regulation •• Control Control GlandsGlandsGlands ExocrineExocrine EndocrineEndocrine •• Secrete Secrete enzymesenzymes •• Secrete Secrete hormoneshormones •• Close Close toto organsorgans •• Transport Transport viavia bloodstreambloodstream •• Require Require receptorsreceptors NervousNervous EndocrineEndocrine WiredWired WirelessWireless NeurotransmittersNeurotransmitters HormonesHormones ShortShort DistanceDistance LongLong Distance Distance ClosenessCloseness ReceptorReceptor Specificity Specificity RapidRapid OnsetOnset DelayedDelayed Onset Onset ShortShort DurationDuration ProlongedProlonged Duration Duration RapidRapid ResponseResponse RegulationRegulation MechanismMechanismMechanism ofofof ActionActionAction HypothalamusHypothalamusHypothalamus HypothalamicHypothalamicHypothalamic ControlControlControl PituitaryPituitaryPituitary PosteriorPosteriorPosterior PituitaryPituitaryPituitary Target Actions Oxytocin Uterus ↑ Contraction Mammary ↑ Milk let-down ADH Kidneys ↑ Water reabsorption AnteriorAnteriorAnterior PituitaryPituitaryPituitary Target Action GH Most tissue ↑ Growth TSH Thyroid ↑ TH secretion ACTH Adrenal ↑ Cortisol Cortex
    [Show full text]
  • Drug-Induced Fatty Liver Disease
    789 Drug-induced fatty liver disease. , 2015; 14CONCISE (6): 789-806 REVIEW November-December, Vol. 14 No. 6, 2015: 789-806 Drug-induced fatty liver disease: An overview of pathogenesis and management Sanjaya K. Satapathy,* Vanessa Kuwajima,** Jeffrey Nadelson,** Omair Atiq,*** Arun J. Sanyal**** * Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, Division of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. ** Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. *** University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA. **** Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA. ABSTRACT Over the past decades, many drugs have been identified, that can potentially induce steatohepatitis in the predisposed individual. Classically this has been incriminated to amiodarone, perhexiline, and 4,4’-diethyla- minoethoxyhexestrol (DH), all of which have been found to independently induce the histologic picture of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Pathogenetic mechanisms of hepatotoxicity although still evolving, demonstrate that mitochondrial dysfunction, deranged ATP production and fatty acid catabolism likely play an important role. Drugs like steroid hormones can exacerbate the pathogenetic mechanisms that lead to NASH, and other drugs like tamoxifen, cisplatin and irenotecan have been shown to precipitate la- tent fatty liver as well. Further research aiming to elucidate
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Chronic Treatment with Rosiglitazone on Leydig Cell Steroidogenesis in Rats
    Couto et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2010, 8:13 http://www.rbej.com/content/8/1/13 RESEARCH Open Access Effect of chronic treatment with Rosiglitazone on Leydig cell steroidogenesis in rats: In vivo and ex vivo studies Janaína A Couto1, Karina LA Saraiva2, Cleiton D Barros3, Daniel P Udrisar4, Christina A Peixoto2, Juliany SB César Vieira4, Maria C Lima3, Suely L Galdino3, Ivan R Pitta3, Maria I Wanderley4* Abstract Background: The present study was designed to examine the effect of chronic treatment with rosiglitazone - thiazolidinedione used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus for its insulin sensitizing effects - on the Leydig cell steroidogenic capacity and expression of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) and cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc) in normal adult rats. Methods: Twelve adult male Wistar rats were treated with rosiglitazone (5 mg/kg) administered by gavage for 15 days. Twelve control animals were treated with the vehicle. The ability of rosiglitazone to directly affect the production of testosterone by Leydig cells ex vivo was evaluated using isolated Leydig cells from rosiglitazone- treated rats. Testosterone production was induced either by activators of the cAMP/PKA pathway (hCG and dbcAMP) or substrates of steroidogenesis [22(R)-hydroxy-cholesterol (22(R)-OH-C), which is a substrate for the P450scc enzyme, and pregnenolone, which is the product of the P450scc-catalyzed step]. Testosterone in plasma and in incubation medium was measured by radioimmunoassay. The StAR and P450scc expression was detected by immunocytochemistry. Results: The levels of total circulating testosterone were not altered by rosiglitazone treatment. A decrease in basal or induced testosterone production occurred in the Leydig cells of rosiglitazone-treated rats.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy
    GENDER-AFFIRMING HORMONE THERAPY Julie Thompson, PA-C Medical Director of Trans Health, Fenway Health March 2020 fenwayhealth.org GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. Review process of initiating hormone therapy through the informed consent model 2. Provide an overview of masculinizing and feminizing hormone therapy 3. Review realistic expectations and benefits of hormone therapy vs their associated risks 4. Discuss recommendations for monitoring fenwayhealth.org PROTOCOLS AND STANDARDS OF CARE fenwayhealth.org WPATH STANDARDS OF CARE, 2011 The criteria for hormone therapy are as follows: 1. Well-documented, persistent (at least 6mo) gender dysphoria 2. Capacity to make a fully informed decision and to consent for treatment 3. Age of majority in a given country 4. If significant medical or mental health concerns are present, they must be reasonably well controlled fenwayhealth.org INFORMED CONSENT MODEL ▪ Requires healthcare provider to ▪ Effectively communicate benefits, risks and alternatives of treatment to patient ▪ Assess that the patient is able to understand and consent to the treatment ▪ Informed consent model does not preclude mental health care! ▪ Recognizes that prescribing decision ultimately rests with clinical judgment of provider working together with the patient ▪ Recognizes patient autonomy and empowers self-agency ▪ Decreases barriers to medically necessary care fenwayhealth.org INITIAL VISITS ▪ Review history of gender experience and patient’s goals ▪ Document prior hormone use ▪ Assess appropriateness for gender affirming medical
    [Show full text]