DOCSLIB.ORG

The Resource Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Resource Management Plan BEAVER COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Beaver County Commissioners Michael F. Dalton, Chair Mark S. Whitney Tammy Pearson Planning & Zoning Commission Darrel Davis, Chairman Kyle Blackner, Administrator Von Christiansen, Attorney Jamie Kelsey, Secretary Steve Kinross Mike Riley Walter Schofield Kolby Blackner Drew Coombs Don Noyes Public Lands KevenDRAFT Whicker, Public Lands Administrator County Staff Scott Albrecht, Michelle Evans, Tracy McMullin, Heidi Eyre Adopted June X, 2017 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... v LEGAL BASIS FOR COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANNING .......................... ix SOCIAL-ECONOMIC LINKAGES ............................................................................................. xi CURRENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SETTING .............................................................. xv DESIRED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SETTING .............................................................. xvii 1. LAND USE ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. ENERGY, MINING, MINERAL & GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES .................................... 9 2.1 Mining and Mineral & Geological Resources .................................................................. 9 2.2 Energy Resources ............................................................................................................ 20 3. AGRICULTURE .................................................................................................................. 26 3.1 Agriculture ...................................................................................................................... 26 3.2 Livestock and Grazing .................................................................................................... 29 3.3 Water Rights & Irrigation ............................................................................................... 40 3.4 Noxious Weeds ............................................................................................................... 44 4. WATER RESOURCES ........................................................................................................ 51 4.1 Hydrology ....................................................................................................................... 52 4.2 Surface Waters ................................................................................................................ 58 4.3 Ditches And Canals ................................DRAFT......................................................................... 61 4.4 Rivers and Streams ......................................................................................................... 62 4.5 Flood Plains and River Terraces ..................................................................................... 65 4.6 Dry Washes and Ephemeral Streams .............................................................................. 68 4.7 Groundwater ................................................................................................................... 72 4.8 Wetlands ......................................................................................................................... 75 4.9 Water Quality .................................................................................................................. 77 ii 5. RECREATION AND TOURISM ........................................................................................ 82 6. FIRE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................ 85 7. LAND ACCESS ................................................................................................................... 90 7.1 Land Access .................................................................................................................... 90 7.2 Wilderness and Other Special Land Designations .......................................................... 94 7.3 Wild and Scenic Rivers ................................................................................................... 99 7.4 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs) ..................................................... 104 7.5 Broadband Access ......................................................................................................... 114 8. CULTURAL, HISTORICAL & PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ......................... 119 9. FISH & WILDLIFE ............................................................................................................ 122 9.1 Fish and Fisheries ......................................................................................................... 122 9.2 Wildlife ......................................................................................................................... 124 9.3 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species ........................................................... 128 9.3.1 Prairie Dog Management ........................................................................................... 141 9.4 Predator Control ............................................................................................................ 144 9.4.1 Wolf Management ..................................................................................................... 148 9.5 Wild Horses .................................................................................................................. 152 10. FOREST MANAGEMENTDRAFT .............................................................................................. 164 11. LAW ENFORCEMENT ................................................................................................... 169 12. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................. 172 13. AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................................. 175 MAP 1 – Locatable Minerals ......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 2 – Salable Minerals (Building Stone) ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 3 – Salable Minerals (Clay) .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. iii MAP 4 – Salable Minerals (Crushed Stone) .................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 5 – Solid Leasable Minerals ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 6 – Wind Energy .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 7 – Solar Energy (BLM Study) ............................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 8 – Solar Energy (UREZ Study) .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 9 – Geothermal Energy ........................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 10 – White Rocks Range WSA ............................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 11 – Wah Wah Mountains WSA .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 12 – Inventoried Roadless Areas .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 13 – Pine Valley Prairie Dog Area ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. MAP 14 – Beaver County BLM HMAs ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. APPENDIX 1 – Scenic Quality Inventory and Evaluation Chart .. Error! Bookmark not defined. APPENDIX 2 – Visual Resource Management Classification Process ...... Error! Bookmark not defined. DRAFT iv INTRODUCTION Plan Process and Methodology The purpose of this County Resource Management Plan (“CRMP”) is to amend the Beaver County General Plan and to address issues related to public and private lands. It is intended, to the maximum extent allowed by law, to establish criteria, policies, and requirements to be followed in the various state and federal land planning processes and to provide consistency across agency boundaries while preserving and enhancing Beaver County’s custom, culture, resources, and socioeconomic base. The information used as the basis for this plan was obtained from various state and federal agencies, experts in various natural resources, public participation, and independent research. After this plan was completed and recommended, the Beaver County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed plan on May X, 2017. The Beaver County Planning and Zoning Commission then forwarded the plan to the Beaver County Commissioners. On June X, 2017, the Beaver County Commissioners held another public hearing. On June X, 2017, the Beaver County Commissioners adopted the plan. County History and Culture Natural resources in Beaver County have been explored and documented as far back as the Dominguez-Escalante Expedition in the late 18th Century. Archaeological discoveries have chronicled Beaver County’s history going back as far as 10,000 years, showing that Beaver County has been home to a variety of peoples and civilizations who utilized the abundant natural resources to survive. Beaver County’s modern day inhabitants still rely heavily on these same resources in order to sustain a high quality of life. As such, it’s indisputable that Beaver County’s culture and history is directly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quaternary Tectonics of Utah with Emphasis on Earthquake-Hazard Characterization
    QUATERNARY TECTONICS OF UTAH WITH EMPHASIS ON EARTHQUAKE-HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION by Suzanne Hecker Utah Geologiral Survey BULLETIN 127 1993 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 0 STATE OF UTAH Michael 0. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGSBoard Member Representing Lynnelle G. Eckels ................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................. Civil Engineering Jo Brandt .................................................................................................................. Public-at-Large C. Williatn Berge ...................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Russell C. Babcock, Jr.............................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ............................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ............................................................................................... Economics-Business/Scientific Scott Hirschi, Director, Division of State Lands and Forestry .................................... Ex officio member UGS Editorial Staff J. Stringfellow .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Beaver County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley The settlement of Beaver County began in February 1856 when fifteen families from Parowan moved by wagon thirty miles north to Beaver Valley. The county was created by the Utah legislature on 31 January 1856, a week before the Parowan group set out to make their new home. However, centuries before, prehistoric peoples lived in the area, obtaining obsidian for arrow and spear points from the Mineral Mountains. Later, the area became home to Paiute Indians. Franciscan Friars Dominguez and Escalante passed through the area in October 1776. The Mormon settlement of Beaver devel­ oped at the foot of the Tushar Mountains. In 1859 the community of Minersville was es­ tablished, and residents farmed, raised live­ stock, and mined the lead deposits there. In the last quarter of the nineteenth century the Mineral Mountains and other locations in the county saw extensive mining develop­ ment, particularly in the towns of Frisco and Newhouse. Mining activities were given a boost with the completion of the Utah South­ ern Railroad to Milford in 1880. The birth­ place of both famous western outlaw Butch Cassidy and inventor of television Philo T. Farnsworth, Beaver County is rich in history, historic buildings, and mineral treasures. ISBN: 0-913738-17-4 A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County A HISTORY OF Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley 1999 Utah State Historical Society Beaver County Commission Copyright © 1999 by Beaver County Commission All rights reserved ISBN 0-913738-17-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 98-61325 Map by Automated Geographic Reference Center—State of Utah Printed in the United States of America Utah State Historical Society 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1182 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii GENERAL INTRODUCTION ix CHAPTER 1 Beaver County: The Places That Shape Us .
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Millard County, Utah
    WATER RESOURCES OF MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH by Fitzhugh D. Davis Utah Geological Survey, retired OPEN-FILE REPORT 447 May 2005 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, stated or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. This Open-File Report makes information available to the public in a timely manner. It may not conform to policy and editorial standards of the Utah Geological Survey. Thus it may be premature for an individual or group to take action based on its contents. WATER RESOURCES OF MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH by Fitzhugh D. Davis Utah Geological Survey, retired 2005 This open-file release makes information available to the public in a timely manner. It may not conform to policy and editorial standards of the Utah Geological Survey. Thus it may be premature for an individual or group to take action based on its contents. Although this product is the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product.
    [Show full text]
  • Conifers of the San Francisco Mountains, San Rafael Swell, and Roan Plateau Ronald M
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 31 | Number 3 Article 11 9-30-1971 Conifers of the San Francisco Mountains, San Rafael Swell, and Roan Plateau Ronald M. Lanner Utah State University Ronald Warnick Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Lanner, Ronald M. and Warnick, Ronald (1971) "Conifers of the San Francisco Mountains, San Rafael Swell, and Roan Plateau," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 31 : No. 3 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol31/iss3/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CONIFERS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO MOUNTAINS, SAN RAFAEL SWELL, AND ROAN PLATEAU 1 Ronald M. Lanner2 and Ronald Warnick 2 This is the second in a series of notes on conifer distribution in The Great Basin and adjacent mountain areas. An earlier paper (Lanner, 1971) presented results of field surveys in selected parts of northern Utah. This article will cover three Utah areas further to the south, which represent diverse geological and environmental conditions. The occurrence of previously unrecorded species localities is supported by specimens deposited in the Intermountain Herbarium at Utah State University, Logan, Utah (UTC). San Francisco Mountains The San Francisco Mountains, a typical Great Basin fault-block range, are located in Beaver and Millard counties. The range is ori- ented roughly on a north-south axis and is about 18 miles in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone
    Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone Ethnography and Ethnographic Synthesis For Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Solar Energy Study Areas in Portions of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah Participating Tribes Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Ibapah, Utah Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, Cedar City, Utah By Richard W. Stoffle Kathleen A. Van Vlack Hannah Z. Johnson Phillip T. Dukes Stephanie C. De Sola Kristen L. Simmons Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology School of Anthropology University of Arizona October 2011 Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 1 WAH WAH VALLEY The proposed Wah Wah Valley solar energy zone (SEZ) is located in the southwestern portion of Utah and is outlined in red below (Figure 1). The proposed Wah Wah Valley SEZ sits in Beaver County, approximately 50 miles northwest of Cedar City and 34 miles east of the Utah/Nevada state line. State-route 21 runs through the length of the northern portion of the SEZ and provides access to the area. Figure 1 Google Earth Image of Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian Study Area The greater Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian study area lies in the Utah Basin and Range province within the Wah Wah Valley. The larger SEZ American Indian study area extends beyond the boundaries of the proposed SEZ because the presence of cultural resources extends into the surrounding landscape. The Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian study area includes plant communities, geological features, water sources, and trail systems located in and around the SEZ boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of UTAH DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Technical
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publication No. 21 SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM DISCHARGES IN UTAH STREAMS by G. L. Whitaker, Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey Prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights 1969 CONTENTS Page Abstract 5 Introduction 5 Streamflow records ................................. .. 5 Use of streamflow data ............................... .. 6 Summary of maximum floods .......................... .. 9 Flood-frequency data. ............................... .. 12 Conclusions ...................................... .. 12 References cited 24 Publications of the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights , 38 I LLUSTRATlONS Page Figure 1- 2. Map showing: 1. Locations of continuous-record stations in 1968 and boundaries of flood-frequency regions and hydrologic areas 7 2. Locations of crest-stage stations in 1968 and boundaries of flood-frequency regions and hydrologic areas 8 Figure 3- 4. Graph showing: 3. Maximum discharges for Utah streams in the Colorado River Basin 10 4. Maximum discharges for Utah streams in the Great Basin 11 Figure 5- 9. Graph showing maximum discharges for streams in the Colorado River Basin: 5. Flood region A 13 6. Flood region B 14 7. Flood region C 15 8. Flood region E 16 9. Flood region F 17 Figure 10-11. Graph showing maximum discharges for streams in the Great Basin: 10. Flood region A '" 18 11. Flood region B 19 Figure 12-13. Graph showing maximum discharges and 50-year floods: 12. For three of the main streams in the Colorado River Basin 20 13. For main streams in the Great Basin 21 2 TABLES Page Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Fire Regimes of Eastern Great Basin (USA) Mountains
    Historic Fire Regimes of Eastern Great Basin (USA) Mountains Reconstructed from Tree Rings Stanley G. Kitchen A dissertation submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Bruce A. Roundy, Chair Joel C. Janetski Robin J. Tausch Matthew F. Bekker Steven L. Petersen Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University April 2010 Copyright © [2010] [Stanley G. Kitchen] All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Historic Fire Regimes of Eastern Great Basin (USA) Mountains Reconstructed from Tree Rings Stanley G. Kitchen Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Doctor of Philosophy Management of natural landscapes requires knowledge of key disturbance processes and their effects. Fire and forest histories provide valuable insight into how fire and vegetation varied and interacted in the past. I constructed multi-century fire chronologies for 10 sites on six mountain ranges representative of the eastern Great Basin (USA), a region in which historic fire information was lacking. I also constructed tree recruitment chronologies for two sites. I use these chronologies to address three research foci. First, using fire-scar data from four heterogeneous sites, I assert that mean fire interval (MFI) values calculated from composite chronologies provide suitable estimates of point MFI (PMFI) when sample area size is ≈½ ha. I also suggest that MFI values for single trees can be used to estimate PMFI after applying a correction factor. Next, I infer climate effects on regional fire patterns using 10 site chronologies and tree-ring-based indices of drought and of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Pacific Decadal Oscillation ([PDO), Pacific Ocean surface temperature variability known to affect North American climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Reconnaissance of the Wah Wah Valley Drainage Basin, Millard and Beaver Counties, Utah
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publication No. 47 HYDROLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE OF THE WAH WAH VALLEY DRAINAGE BASIN, MILLARD AND BEAVER COUNTIES, UTAH by Jerry C. Stephens, Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey Prepared by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights 1974 CONTENTS Page Abstract. 1 Introduction. 2 General hydrologic environment. 2 Physiography 5 Climate. 5 Vegetation • 5 Geology. 7 Hydrology and water-resource development. 9 Surface water. 9 Ground water 11 Quaternary and Tertiary sedimentary rocks 13 Stream-channel alluvium. 13 Spring deposits. 14 Older alluvium • 14 Tertiary igneous rocks. 19 Extrusive rocks. 19 Intrusive rocks. 20 Paleozoic and Precambrian rocks 21 Carbonate rocks. 21 Wah Wah Springs 21 Quartzite and metasedimentary rocks. 25 Summary of ground-water recharge and discharge. 26 Chemical quality and temperature of the water. 27 Summary and needs for future study. 29 Selected references 32 Appendix. 35 Numbering system for hydrologic-data sites 36 Use of metric units. 36 Basic data. 39 Publications of the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights. 47 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate 1. Generalized hydrogeologic and geologic maps and sections of the Wah Wah Valley drainage basin. In pocket Figure 1. Map showing location of the Wah Wah Valley drainage basin and areas described in previously published reports in this series •••••••••••• 3 2. Photographs of Wah Wah Valley. 4 3. Map showing normal annual precipitation and location of sites for which runoff was estimated. • • • • • 6 4. Photographs of the Wah Wah Springs discharge area.
    [Show full text]
  • Frisco HMA © Robert Hammer
    Frisco HMA © Robert Hammer www.wildhorsetourist.com Description Gentle mustangs, fierce badgers, gregarious goldfinches, and the silent, crumbling remnants of a dark and deadly human past. The Frisco HMA covers about 95 square miles enveloping the San Francisco Mountains, just 15 miles northwest of Milford, Utah. The BLM’s 2015 population estimate placed this herd’s size at 146 horses; however, 113 mustangs were removed in July, 2016. Factoring in population growth, the number of horses remaining after this gather is probably between 40 and 50, but I had little difficulty finding about a quarter of them during an October 2016 visit. The mustangs seem to favor the foothills and rolling knolls east of Frisco Peak, the highest summit of the San Francisco Mountain Range. The ruins of Frisco and Newhouse, two Nineteenth Century mining towns, lie just outside the southern and southwestern borders of the defined herd area. The historical marker beside UT-21 labels Frisco a “typical mining town,” providing a few statistics defining the “fabulous” but short-lived boom. Various historical summaries around the web paint a more colorful picture, calling to mind scenes from HBO’s Deadwood. But a visit to the Frisco Cemetery recasts these depictions in darker, bluer hues. The majority – by far – of the headstones remaining in this despairing plot commemorate the brief lives of infants and children. What a cruel, harsh, godforsaken place this must have been. But don’t let my mournful reflections deter you. This is a fascinating and beautiful area, close to the conveniences of civilization, yet far removed from its impositions and distractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2: Descriptive Information for Each Hydrographic Area Within the Great Basin Carbonate and Alluvial Aquifer System Study Area
    Appendix 2: Descriptive Information for Each Hydrographic Area within the Great Basin Carbonate and Alluvial Aquifer System Study Area By Victor M. Heilweil and Susan G. Buto Appendix 2 of Conceptual Model of the Great Basin Carbonate and Alluvial Aquifer System Edited by Victor M. Heilweil and Lynette E. Brooks Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5193 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Heilweil, V.M., and Brooks, L.E., eds., 2011, Conceptual model of the Great Basin carbonate and alluvial aquifer system: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5193, 191 p. iii Contents Table A2–1. Descriptive information for each hydrographic
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Potentiometric-Surface Map of the Great Basin Carbonate And
    U.S. Department of the Interior Scientific Investigations Map 3193 U.S. Geological Survey Sheet 1 of 2 Abstract sites, water levels were measured in several nested wells, including 8 sites where the nested as great. However, water levels in wells throughout Spring and Snake Valleys also appear 114°30' 114°00' 113°30' 113°00' TOOELE COUNTY wells are all in either consolidated rock or basin fill, and 4 sites where the nested wells are to respond to interannual climate variations. 0 0 -15 Water-level measurements from 190 wells were used to develop a potentiometric-surface screened in both basin fill and consolidated rock. Water-level data at nested well sites were USGS site number: 393814113522601 JUAB COUNTY Callao USGS site number: 395355112423601 125 Most water-level records in the study area show no distinct, long-term monotonic trends Deep Creek Fish Springs used to examine vertical differences in hydraulic head. While one location had an upward 5 Well depth: 158 feet 5 Valley -10 Well depth: 90 feet USGS site number: 395331113123901 map of the east-central portion of the regional Great Basin carbonate and alluvial aquifer (rises or declines). However, in the area north of Highway 50 in Snake Valley, water levels Well number: 190 National 130 Well depth: 157 feet Well number: 171 USGS site number: 394133113493901 253 Wildlife Refuge system in and around Snake Valley, eastern Nevada and western Utah. The map area covers vertical gradient of 0.3, vertical hydraulic gradients were generally less than 0.05. These Well number: 188 in five wells (108, 114, 120, 129, and 136) have been declining since about the mid- to late- 10 10 Well depth: Unknown -5 approximately 9,000 square miles in Juab, Millard, and Beaver Counties, Utah, and White small vertical gradients indicate a hydraulic connection between basin fill and consolidated 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Wah Wah Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Beaver and Millard Counties, Utah
    Mineral Resources of the Wah Wah Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Beaver and Millard Counties, Utah U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1749-B ~^V»«K3M9*i ,J£3» "^w- -» » ift " -*-* '^^ *-' ^K*"*^^i»Ju^-tCTja!P^B*iai " uiiwt^^' ""^ 1_. -»«s - .S~t ~* ^-: -f^*^ # ** »». jfe&s& ^ >- -*> " ' UTAH s-*-a*«*>.->'r *****«««*»* / r. ___, . «. ,...*, p-U- J^SS. i - Jj*- " t -y*~-~ ^f ililh^iT ^: ; .j.v - "- Va^i r ' -T^ ^^^^~^^%: '--iJiMfrff "ir^ %. ,,5^^^:', .. -' ' "" - \T^^^^^?^-?^^S^^^^"^^rK jj'v'i^''*K .^ ;^S* «*r»-TT^--^%^ :;:.-;«^S?swS-- - . Chapter B Mineral Resources of the Wah Wah Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Beaver and Millard Counties, Utah By LESLIE J. COX, KAREN A. DUTTWEILER, DAVID L CAMPBELL, JOSEPH S. DUVAL, MELVIN H. PODWYSOCKI, VIKI BANKEY, and KENNETH L COOK U.S. Geological Survey S. DON BROWN U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1749 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS WEST-CENTRAL UTAH DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1989 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mineral resources of the Wah Wah Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Beaver and Millard counties, Utah / by Leslie J. Cox ...[et al.]. p. cm. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Utah ; ch. B) (U.S.
    [Show full text]