WESTERN SPOTTED FROG (Rana Pretiosa) DISTRIBUTION in the BONNEVILLE BASIN of WESTERN UTAH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WESTERN SPOTTED FROG (Rana Pretiosa) DISTRIBUTION in the BONNEVILLE BASIN of WESTERN UTAH WESTERN SPOTTED FROG (Rana pretiosa) DISTRIBUTION IN THE BONNEVILLE BASIN OF WESTERN UTAH AND AQUATIC RESOURCE DESCRIPTION OF TULE VALLEY (WHITE VALLEY) OF WESTERN UTAH Research in Progress Peter Hovingh Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah February 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I METHODS AND MATERIALS 2 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS IN TULE VALLEY 3 Aquatic Resources in Tule Valley 3 Plants in the greasewood faciation 4 Animals in the greasewood community 5 Geological notes 7 TULE VALLEY WETLANDS: DETAILED OBSERVATIONS 8 Coyote Springs Complex 8 North-central Springs Complex 9 Saline Ponds complex 9 South-central Springs Complex 9 North Tule springs complex 10 South Tule springs complex 12 South Spring complex 12 WESTERN SPOTTED FROG BIOLO&Y IN TULE VALLEY 14 Breeding behavior in Tule Valley 14 Embryonic and tadpole observations 14 Immature frog observations 15 Adult breeding sizes 15 Population numbers 15 Aquatic parameters of the Western Spotted Frog in Tule Valley 16 CURRENT STATUS AND BIOGEOGRAPHICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF THE WESTERN SPOTTED FROG IN THE GREAT BASIN 18 Mobility and isolation of the western spatted frog in Tule Valley 18 Biogeographic distribution in the Bonneville Basin 19 Current distribution of the western spotted frog 20 Subspeciation in the western spotted frog 23 MANAGEMENT PLAN PROPOSAL FOR THE WESTERN SPOTTED FROG 24 MANAGEMENT PLAN PROPOSAL FOR TULE VALLEY WETLANDS 25 REFERENCES TABLES AND FIGURES INTRODUCTION The Western Spotted Frog (Rana pretiosa) is widely distributed in many isolated populations throughout Utah, Nevada, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Alberta, British Columbia, and Alaska. These isolated populations could probably be explained by events which occurred during the last glaciation some 20,000 years ago. In Utah the distribution has been identified as Deep Creek in western Utah and along the Wasatch Front. With the location of the ·Western Spotted Frog in Tule Valley, a close examination of the locations in Utah and Nevada shows that one can postulate that the Western Spotted Frog was widely distributed in the Bonneville Basin at the time of Lake Bonneville. Subsequent desiccation of Lake Bonneville some 11,000 years ago left many isolated populations. Some of these populations may be now extinct (Thousand Springs and Salt Lake Valley). It would be of great scientific interest to study all the isolated populations of the Western Spotted Frog by biochemical means to determine if the Western Spotted Frog has been evolving into distinct populations since the glacial and pluvial times. The Tule Valley population of the Western Spotted Frog may consists of at least four separate and isolated populations. Tule Valley contains numerous springs and wetlands in the bottom of the valley. Since the springs are slightly alkaline and saline and since much of the valley consists of saline playas, conductivity, temperature, and pH values were taken throughout the year. It was determine that the terminus of the springs (where the Western Spotted Frog bred) was not accumulating salts. Since many of the springs were warm water springs {temperature 27-29 C), these springs and wetlands provide great opportunity to study the biological adaptations to saline, alkaline, and temperature variations and gradients. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS IN TULE VALLEY AQUATIC RESOURCES IN TULE VALLEY. Tule Valley is located in western Utah between 38° 45 1 and 39° 45 1 latitude north and between 113° 15' and 113° 45 1 longitude west. Tule Valley drainage basin consists of about 243 square kilometers (940 square miles) (Stephens, 1977) with a subsurface inflow of 29.6 hm 3 (24,000 acre-feet) and precipitation of 9.4 hm 3 (7,600 acre-feet) (Gates and Kruer, 1981). Evapotranspiration results in 39.5 hm 3 (32,000 acre-feet) of water leaving the valley (Stephens, 1977 and Gates and Kruer, 1981). Minor contributions of ground water discharge come from the House Range (Painter, Wildhorse and Sinbad Springs) and the Confusion Range (Skunk and Willow Springs) and will not be discussed further. The central wetlands and springs account for most of the discharge of water from the subsurface flows and the greasewood faciation of the northern desert shrub biome surround these springs and account for most of the evapotranspiration. The wetlands in this report are all located between 1347 and 1350 m (4419 and 4428 feet) elevation and the lowest adjacent lands are 1340 and 1344 m (4395 and 4409 feet) elevation. Figure 1 shows the map of central Tule Valley and the locations of the wetlands. Figure 2 shows a cross-section of Tule Valley and the location of the springs. Figure 3 shows the detailed location of the central springs and wetlands. Table 1 shows that the mean temperature of the springs varied between 15 and 31 C and that conductivity varied between 1530 and 2730 umhos/cm. As the water flowed from the source of these springs, the seasonal temperature ranged from frozen in winter to 34 C in summer and the conductivity could double in some portions distal from the source in the summer. Figure 4 shows the temperature ranges a~ two springs and Figure 5 shows the conductivity ranges at four springs. Some locations of the wetlands seem to have their own temperate variations as the open pond in Coyote Springs (as Site U, shown in Figure 4). The pH of the spring periphery was always higher than the spring source with as much as 2.0 pH units difference (Figure 6 shows pH variations at two springs). Temperature transects (measurements taken every two feet from the shore to the interior or from the shore to shore across the stream flow) indicated that only minor fluctuations of temperature ( 2 to 3 C) occurred at a given location throughout the day where the current was flowing. In the peripheral -5- spring source. Willows (Salix exigu~) were identified by Fautin (1946) but these no longer occur in the central valley wetlands, although there are stumps remaining in South-Central Spring #8 and possibly in a desiccated portion of North Tule #1. Adjacent to the wetlands a zone consisting of numerous grasses occurs. In this zone is the marsh grass Distichlis spicata, White Pepper Plant (Lepidium), Juncus, Eleocharis, salt wort (Glaux maritima), Blue-eyed Grass (Sisyrinchium), fox-tail grass, buttercups (Ranunculus), Cinquefoil (Portilla anserina), aster, dandelions, and cutleaf water parsnip (Berula) . Beyond the grass perimeter of the wetlands the greasewood {Sarcobatus vermiculatus) becomes the dominant vegetation. Tamarix and Phragmites also occur in limited areas. Other plants in the Greasewood faciation include Distichlis stricta, Distichlis spicata, Allenrolfea occidentalis Salicornia utahens, Suaeda fruiticosa (salt blits), Atriplex nuttallii, Atriplex falcata, Sporobolus, Bassia and rabbitbrush. The expression of the numerous plants depends upon the availability of water, the concentration of salt and the alkaline nature of the soils. A~'I~:·/\LS OF TI-'E GRE.~SEHCOO CDM~Ii\Ut-'ITY. Fautin (1946) 1 isted l<t:n0aroo Rats {Dipodomys microps, Dipodomys ordii), Kangaroo mouse (Microdipodops megacephalus), grasshopper mouse (Onychonmys leucogaster), harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), ground squirrels (Citellus townsendi and Citellus leucurus), pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), jack rabbit (Lepus californicus), cottontail (Sylivlagus nuttalii), badger (Taxidea taxus), coyote (Canis latrans), kit fox (Vulpers macrolis) and antelope (Antilocarpa americana). Bats were seen at midday at South Tule Spring on June 13. Wildhorses seem to cross the valley between Confusion RAnge and the House Range and pass by Coyote Spring. Table 2 lists the birds and the season in which they were seen. Mallards, Marsh Hawks, Horned Larks, Ravens, Long-billed Marsh Wrens, and possibly Savannah Sparrows can be found most of the year in Tule Valley. Cinnamon Teal, Coot, Mourning Dove, Burrowing Owl, Sage Thrasher, Yellow-headed Blackbird, Red-winged Blackbird, Brown-headed Cowbird, Sage Sparrow, and -7- regurgitated (by Coyote ?) and appeared in sequential state of undigested and living (stunned) to partially digested on September 25. One lizard was observed walking in the water- perhaps brought there by a predator. Predators may include Coyotes, Marsh Hawks, Prairie Falcons, and badgers. GEOLOGICAL NOTES. For about 10,000 years Tule Valley was a bay of Lake Bonneville. This lake desiccated some 11,000 years ago. Once the bay was isolated from the main Lake Bonneville at Sand Pass, one can calculate that at an assumed rate of evaporation of 114 em (45 inches) per year, the 183m (600 foot) deep lake dried up in about 160 years. This of course assumes that water from Snake Valley, the Sevier drainage and remnant Lake Bonneville were not sources of ground water recharge into Tule Valley at that time. The present water in the central wetlands and springs of Tule Valley may arise from the Snake Valley, Wah Wah Valley and Pine Valley through flows in consolidated rocks (Gates and Kruer, 1981). The water arising at Fish Springs to the north of Tule Valley have been dated with radiocarbon to be 9000 to 14000 years old (Gates and Kruer, 1981). The water arising in Tule Vally could likewise be this old. The water arising in the Tule Valley springs (South Tule, North Tule #1, North Tule #25, North Tule #3, and North Tule #5) may have flowed at much greater rates of discharge in the past as evident from the extensive eroded valleys that extend beyond the present wetlands. There is an abundant amount of mollusc remnants in the spring sources and in the water current. Attempts to find living mollusc in the Tule Valley springs and wetlands have not been fruitful. Fish Springs to the north and numerous springs in Snake Valley do contain abundant numbers of mollusc and many diverse species. -9- NORTH-CENTRAL COMPLEX consists of diverse wetlands pattern. The largest wetlands is Spring #12 with 48,000 m2 surface area and the smallest is 2 about 500m (Springs #11, 24, and 13).
Recommended publications
  • Quaternary Tectonics of Utah with Emphasis on Earthquake-Hazard Characterization
    QUATERNARY TECTONICS OF UTAH WITH EMPHASIS ON EARTHQUAKE-HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION by Suzanne Hecker Utah Geologiral Survey BULLETIN 127 1993 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 0 STATE OF UTAH Michael 0. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGSBoard Member Representing Lynnelle G. Eckels ................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................. Civil Engineering Jo Brandt .................................................................................................................. Public-at-Large C. Williatn Berge ...................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Russell C. Babcock, Jr.............................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ............................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ............................................................................................... Economics-Business/Scientific Scott Hirschi, Director, Division of State Lands and Forestry .................................... Ex officio member UGS Editorial Staff J. Stringfellow .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Beaver County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley The settlement of Beaver County began in February 1856 when fifteen families from Parowan moved by wagon thirty miles north to Beaver Valley. The county was created by the Utah legislature on 31 January 1856, a week before the Parowan group set out to make their new home. However, centuries before, prehistoric peoples lived in the area, obtaining obsidian for arrow and spear points from the Mineral Mountains. Later, the area became home to Paiute Indians. Franciscan Friars Dominguez and Escalante passed through the area in October 1776. The Mormon settlement of Beaver devel­ oped at the foot of the Tushar Mountains. In 1859 the community of Minersville was es­ tablished, and residents farmed, raised live­ stock, and mined the lead deposits there. In the last quarter of the nineteenth century the Mineral Mountains and other locations in the county saw extensive mining develop­ ment, particularly in the towns of Frisco and Newhouse. Mining activities were given a boost with the completion of the Utah South­ ern Railroad to Milford in 1880. The birth­ place of both famous western outlaw Butch Cassidy and inventor of television Philo T. Farnsworth, Beaver County is rich in history, historic buildings, and mineral treasures. ISBN: 0-913738-17-4 A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County A HISTORY OF Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley 1999 Utah State Historical Society Beaver County Commission Copyright © 1999 by Beaver County Commission All rights reserved ISBN 0-913738-17-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 98-61325 Map by Automated Geographic Reference Center—State of Utah Printed in the United States of America Utah State Historical Society 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1182 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii GENERAL INTRODUCTION ix CHAPTER 1 Beaver County: The Places That Shape Us .
    [Show full text]
  • The Resource Management Plan
    BEAVER COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Beaver County Commissioners Michael F. Dalton, Chair Mark S. Whitney Tammy Pearson Planning & Zoning Commission Darrel Davis, Chairman Kyle Blackner, Administrator Von Christiansen, Attorney Jamie Kelsey, Secretary Steve Kinross Mike Riley Walter Schofield Kolby Blackner Drew Coombs Don Noyes Public Lands KevenDRAFT Whicker, Public Lands Administrator County Staff Scott Albrecht, Michelle Evans, Tracy McMullin, Heidi Eyre Adopted June X, 2017 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... v LEGAL BASIS FOR COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANNING .......................... ix SOCIAL-ECONOMIC LINKAGES ............................................................................................. xi CURRENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SETTING .............................................................. xv DESIRED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SETTING .............................................................. xvii 1. LAND USE ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. ENERGY, MINING, MINERAL & GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES .................................... 9 2.1 Mining and Mineral & Geological Resources .................................................................. 9 2.2 Energy Resources ............................................................................................................ 20 3. AGRICULTURE .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Millard County, Utah
    WATER RESOURCES OF MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH by Fitzhugh D. Davis Utah Geological Survey, retired OPEN-FILE REPORT 447 May 2005 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, stated or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. This Open-File Report makes information available to the public in a timely manner. It may not conform to policy and editorial standards of the Utah Geological Survey. Thus it may be premature for an individual or group to take action based on its contents. WATER RESOURCES OF MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH by Fitzhugh D. Davis Utah Geological Survey, retired 2005 This open-file release makes information available to the public in a timely manner. It may not conform to policy and editorial standards of the Utah Geological Survey. Thus it may be premature for an individual or group to take action based on its contents. Although this product is the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product.
    [Show full text]
  • Conifers of the San Francisco Mountains, San Rafael Swell, and Roan Plateau Ronald M
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 31 | Number 3 Article 11 9-30-1971 Conifers of the San Francisco Mountains, San Rafael Swell, and Roan Plateau Ronald M. Lanner Utah State University Ronald Warnick Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Lanner, Ronald M. and Warnick, Ronald (1971) "Conifers of the San Francisco Mountains, San Rafael Swell, and Roan Plateau," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 31 : No. 3 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol31/iss3/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CONIFERS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO MOUNTAINS, SAN RAFAEL SWELL, AND ROAN PLATEAU 1 Ronald M. Lanner2 and Ronald Warnick 2 This is the second in a series of notes on conifer distribution in The Great Basin and adjacent mountain areas. An earlier paper (Lanner, 1971) presented results of field surveys in selected parts of northern Utah. This article will cover three Utah areas further to the south, which represent diverse geological and environmental conditions. The occurrence of previously unrecorded species localities is supported by specimens deposited in the Intermountain Herbarium at Utah State University, Logan, Utah (UTC). San Francisco Mountains The San Francisco Mountains, a typical Great Basin fault-block range, are located in Beaver and Millard counties. The range is ori- ented roughly on a north-south axis and is about 18 miles in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone
    Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone Ethnography and Ethnographic Synthesis For Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Solar Energy Study Areas in Portions of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah Participating Tribes Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Ibapah, Utah Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, Cedar City, Utah By Richard W. Stoffle Kathleen A. Van Vlack Hannah Z. Johnson Phillip T. Dukes Stephanie C. De Sola Kristen L. Simmons Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology School of Anthropology University of Arizona October 2011 Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 1 WAH WAH VALLEY The proposed Wah Wah Valley solar energy zone (SEZ) is located in the southwestern portion of Utah and is outlined in red below (Figure 1). The proposed Wah Wah Valley SEZ sits in Beaver County, approximately 50 miles northwest of Cedar City and 34 miles east of the Utah/Nevada state line. State-route 21 runs through the length of the northern portion of the SEZ and provides access to the area. Figure 1 Google Earth Image of Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian Study Area The greater Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian study area lies in the Utah Basin and Range province within the Wah Wah Valley. The larger SEZ American Indian study area extends beyond the boundaries of the proposed SEZ because the presence of cultural resources extends into the surrounding landscape. The Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian study area includes plant communities, geological features, water sources, and trail systems located in and around the SEZ boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • ARAZPA YOTF Infopack.Pdf
    ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Information pack ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Printing: The ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign pack was generously supported by Madman Printing Phone: +61 3 9244 0100 Email: [email protected] Front cover design: Patrick Crawley, www.creepycrawleycartoons.com Mobile: 0401 316 827 Email: [email protected] Front cover photo: Pseudophryne pengilleyi, Northern Corroboree Frog. Photo courtesy of Lydia Fucsko. Printed on 100% recycled stock 2 ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Contents Foreword.........................................................................................................................................5 Foreword part II ………………………………………………………………………………………… ...6 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................9 Section 1: Why A Campaign?....................................................................................................11 The Connection Between Man and Nature........................................................................11 Man’s Effect on Nature ......................................................................................................11 Frogs Matter ......................................................................................................................11 The Problem ......................................................................................................................12 The Reason
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of UTAH DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Technical
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publication No. 21 SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM DISCHARGES IN UTAH STREAMS by G. L. Whitaker, Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey Prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights 1969 CONTENTS Page Abstract 5 Introduction 5 Streamflow records ................................. .. 5 Use of streamflow data ............................... .. 6 Summary of maximum floods .......................... .. 9 Flood-frequency data. ............................... .. 12 Conclusions ...................................... .. 12 References cited 24 Publications of the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights , 38 I LLUSTRATlONS Page Figure 1- 2. Map showing: 1. Locations of continuous-record stations in 1968 and boundaries of flood-frequency regions and hydrologic areas 7 2. Locations of crest-stage stations in 1968 and boundaries of flood-frequency regions and hydrologic areas 8 Figure 3- 4. Graph showing: 3. Maximum discharges for Utah streams in the Colorado River Basin 10 4. Maximum discharges for Utah streams in the Great Basin 11 Figure 5- 9. Graph showing maximum discharges for streams in the Colorado River Basin: 5. Flood region A 13 6. Flood region B 14 7. Flood region C 15 8. Flood region E 16 9. Flood region F 17 Figure 10-11. Graph showing maximum discharges for streams in the Great Basin: 10. Flood region A '" 18 11. Flood region B 19 Figure 12-13. Graph showing maximum discharges and 50-year floods: 12. For three of the main streams in the Colorado River Basin 20 13. For main streams in the Great Basin 21 2 TABLES Page Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Fire Regimes of Eastern Great Basin (USA) Mountains
    Historic Fire Regimes of Eastern Great Basin (USA) Mountains Reconstructed from Tree Rings Stanley G. Kitchen A dissertation submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Bruce A. Roundy, Chair Joel C. Janetski Robin J. Tausch Matthew F. Bekker Steven L. Petersen Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University April 2010 Copyright © [2010] [Stanley G. Kitchen] All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Historic Fire Regimes of Eastern Great Basin (USA) Mountains Reconstructed from Tree Rings Stanley G. Kitchen Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Doctor of Philosophy Management of natural landscapes requires knowledge of key disturbance processes and their effects. Fire and forest histories provide valuable insight into how fire and vegetation varied and interacted in the past. I constructed multi-century fire chronologies for 10 sites on six mountain ranges representative of the eastern Great Basin (USA), a region in which historic fire information was lacking. I also constructed tree recruitment chronologies for two sites. I use these chronologies to address three research foci. First, using fire-scar data from four heterogeneous sites, I assert that mean fire interval (MFI) values calculated from composite chronologies provide suitable estimates of point MFI (PMFI) when sample area size is ≈½ ha. I also suggest that MFI values for single trees can be used to estimate PMFI after applying a correction factor. Next, I infer climate effects on regional fire patterns using 10 site chronologies and tree-ring-based indices of drought and of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Pacific Decadal Oscillation ([PDO), Pacific Ocean surface temperature variability known to affect North American climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Spotted Frog (Rana Pretiosa) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Adopted under Section 44 of SARA Recovery Strategy for the Oregon Spotted Frog (Rana pretiosa) in Canada Oregon Spotted Frog 2015 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2015. Recovery Strategy for the Oregon Spotted Frog (Rana pretiosa) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. 23 pp. + Annex. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including COSEWIC Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: © Kelly McAllister Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement de la grenouille maculée de l’Oregon (Rana pretiosa) au Canada » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2015. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-660-03353-2 Catalogue no. En3-4/201-2015E-PDF Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca RECOVERY STRATEGY FOR THE OREGON SPOTTED FROG (Rana pretiosa) IN CANADA 2015 Under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996), the federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together on legislation, programs, and policies to protect wildlife species at risk throughout Canada. In the spirit of cooperation of the Accord, the Government of British Columbia has given permission to the Government of Canada to adopt the "Recovery Strategy for the Oregon Spotted Frog (Rana pretiosa) in British Columbia" (Part 2) under Section 44 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the Columbia Spotted Frog in Northeastern Oregon
    United States Department of Agriculture Ecology of the Columbia Forest Service Pacific Northwest Spotted Frog in Research Station General Technical Northeastern Oregon Report PNW-GTR-640 July 2005 Evelyn L. Bull The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sus- tained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and manage- ment of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, reli- gion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. USDA is committed to making the information materials accessible to all USDA customers and employees Author Evelyn L. Bull is a research wildlife biologist, Forestry and Range Sciences Laboratory, 1401 Gekeler Lane, La Grande, OR 97850. Cover photo Columbia spotted frogs at an oviposition site with an egg mass present (lower center of photo).
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Spotted Frog
    Alaska Species Ranking System - Columbia spotted frog Columbia spotted frog Class: Amphibia Order: Anura Rana luteiventris Review Status: Peer-reviewed Version Date: 08 May 2018 Conservation Status NatureServe: Agency: G Rank:G4 ADF&G: IUCN:Least Concern Audubon AK: S Rank: S2 USFWS: BLM: Final Rank Conservation category: V. Orange unknown status and either high biological vulnerability or high action need Category Range Score Status -20 to 20 0 Biological -50 to 50 -19 Action -40 to 40 24 Higher numerical scores denote greater concern Status - variables measure the trend in a taxon’s population status or distribution. Higher status scores denote taxa with known declining trends. Status scores range from -20 (increasing) to 20 (decreasing). Score Population Trend in Alaska (-10 to 10) 0 Statewide trend is unknown. May be declining on the northern end of Mitkof Island (Ream 2016). Distribution Trend in Alaska (-10 to 10) 0 Unknown. Status Total: 0 Biological - variables measure aspects of a taxon’s distribution, abundance and life history. Higher biological scores suggest greater vulnerability to extirpation. Biological scores range from -50 (least vulnerable) to 50 (most vulnerable). Score Population Size in Alaska (-10 to 10) -6 In southeast Alaska, described as "fairly common along mainland river valleys" by Carstensen et al. (2003). Field surveys in the Stikine River area, which covered only a small portion of its statewide range, detected nearly 500 individuals (Ream 2016). J. Ream (UAF, pers. comm.) estimates that there >10,000 individuals in the state. We rank this question as E- Population unknown, but suspected large. Range Size in Alaska (-10 to 10) -2 Patchily distributed on the mainland of southeast Alaska from the Taku River south to British Columbia (Waters 1992; Lindell and Grossman 1998; MacDonald 2010; Ream 2016).
    [Show full text]