Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
In vivo continuous directed evolution
1,2 1,2
Ahmed H Badran and David R Liu
The development and application of methods for the laboratory substrate for purified Qb RNA-dependent RNA-repli-
evolution of biomolecules has rapidly progressed over the last case. After 74 serial passages of this RNA genome, a
few decades. Advancements in continuous microbe culturing variant was produced that was both 83% smaller and
and selection design have facilitated the development of new could be replicated 15 times faster than the starting
technologies that enable the continuous directed evolution of Qb RNA genome. Importantly, this study highlighted
proteins and nucleic acids. These technologies have the the critical nature of selection pressure design, as the
potential to support the extremely rapid evolution of evolved Qb RNA genome could be replicated at a sig-
biomolecules with tailor-made functional properties. nificantly faster rate than the parental genome, but could
Continuous evolution methods must support all of the key no longer direct the synthesis of viral particles since this
steps of laboratory evolution — translation of genes into gene requirement was not implicit in the selection.
products, selection or screening, replication of genes encoding
the most fit gene products, and mutation of surviving genes — Thirty years later, Joyce and coworkers described the first
in a self-sustaining manner that requires little or no researcher system for the continuous directed evolution of catalytic
intervention. Continuous laboratory evolution has been function. The researchers established a self-sustaining
historically used to study problems including antibiotic RNA replication cycle for RNA molecules capable of
resistance, organismal adaptation, phylogenetic catalyzing their own ligation to an RNA–DNA substrate
reconstruction, and host–pathogen interactions, with more [2]. Like the Qb system, the RNA ligase ribozyme
recent applications focusing on the rapid generation of proteins continuous evolution system relied on exogenously sup-
and nucleic acids with useful, tailor-made properties. The plied materials (reverse transcriptase and T7 RNA poly-
advent of increasingly general methods for continuous directed merase). Since these early studies, a number of additional
evolution should enable researchers to address increasingly continuous directed evolution systems have been
complex questions and to access biomolecules with more
described, the majority of which are limited to either
novel or even unprecedented properties.
catalytic RNAs or involve the evolution of alternative
Addresses RNA functions [2–7]. Additionally, these methods have
1
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, been exclusively carried out in vitro, where the compara-
Cambridge, MA 02138, United States tive ease of manipulation and selection stringency adjust-
2
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
ment can be exploited compared to in vivo methods.
02138, United States
Nevertheless, these early landmark studies vividly
Corresponding author: Liu, David R ([email protected]) demonstrated the potential of continuous directed evo-
lution and provided a foundation for subsequent
advances.
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2015, 24:1–10
This review comes from a themed issue on Omics All forms of Darwinian evolution must support four
fundamental processes: translation (when the evolving
Edited by Benjamin F Cravatt and Thomas Kodadek
molecule is not identical to the information carrier),
selection, replication, and mutation (Figure 1).
Traditional directed evolution methods handle each of
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.09.040 these processes discretely, frequently requiring steps in
1367-5931/Published by Elsevier Ltd. which the researcher must perform experimental manip-
ulations. In contrast, continuous directed evolution sys-
tems must seamlessly integrate all of these processes into
an uninterrupted cycle. For the purposes of this review,
we define continuous directed evolution as a general
method capable of evolving a specific phenotype, at
Introduction the level of an organism or a set of genes, over many
Initially demonstrated as a surrogate for Darwinian evo- cycles of mutation, selection, and replication with mini-
lution by Spiegelman and coworkers almost five decades mal researcher intervention. A continuous evolution
ago [1], continuous directed evolution has long been method therefore must support all four stages of Darwi-
envisioned as a potentially highly efficient method to nian evolution and allow the surviving genes from one
discover novel biomolecules with activities of interest. In generation to spontaneously enter the translation, selec-
Spiegelman’s seminal study, Qb bacteriophage genomic tion, replication, and mutation processes of the sub-
RNA was amplified based on its ability to serve as a sequent generation.
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2015, 24:1–10 2 Omics
Figure 1
Mutation - Error-prone PCR - Site-saturation mutagenesis - Nucleoside analog incorporation - Structure-guided mutagenesis - Chemical mutagens - Mutators strains - DNA shuffling/recombination
Replication Translation - PCR - Ribosome in vitro - RT-PCR - RNA polymerase in vitro - Organismal reproduction - Ribosome in vivo - RNA polymerase in vivo
Selection or Screen - Emulsion/compartmentalization - Display methods - FRET/BRET - Activity-dependent pull-down - Split-protein reassembly - n-Hybrid systems - Antibiotic resistance - Conditional survival or complementation
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Schematic representation of directed evolution. All complete directed evolution methods must provide four major components: translation,
selection or screening, replication, and mutation. Historical examples of each of these components are listed. Techniques that are particularly
amenable to in vivo continuous directed evolution are shown in green.
Many key studies on continuous evolution have relied on recent developments in the field of in vivo continuous
manual serial dilution of the evolving population as a directed evolution over the past two decades and their
mechanism for propagating genes and controlling selec- impact, both realized and prospective, on the directed
tion stringency. We do not consider this technical manip- evolution community.
ulation to violate our definition, as such systems have
been shown to be amenable to automation, yielding Viral continuous evolution
similar results [8]. While in vivo continuous evolution With their high mutation rates [9] and relative ease of
methods have exploited the natural occurrence of the manipulation and study, bacteriophages were used early
three steps of Darwinian evolution in living organisms, on as model organisms for rapid directed evolution of
these methods have also historically been constrained by readily selectable traits [10]. Moreover, the development
modest scope, often focusing on easily selected pheno- of methods for continually culturing bacterial strains has
types such as antibiotic resistance rather than traits associ- greatly reduced the barrier for studying bacteriophage
ated with diverse applications and unmet needs. evolution under continuous selection pressure [10,11]. Of
Recently, more general in vivo continuous directed evo- historical note is the early and widespread use of both
lution methods have been developed using various organ- chemostats, cultures maintained through the continuous
isms, ranging from viruses to bacteria to higher inflow of fresh growth medium, and auxostats, cultures
eukaryotes. In this review, we highlight a sampling of regulated by a feedback mechanism that controls the
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2015, 24:1–10 www.sciencedirect.com
In vivo continuous directed evolution Badran and Liu 3
inflow of growth medium based on a monitored culture cells, resulting in high levels of co-infection and compe-
parameter (Figure 2). Both methods have proven useful tition between phage. While the mutation rates observed
in continuous culturing of bacteriophage-infectable under these conditions were high with respect to the size of
microbes. Methods for bacterial continuous evolution will the viral genome and sufficient for rapid phage adaptation,
be covered in the next section. higher rates are typically required to access gene-specific
evolution goals (1–2 mutations per round per gene) [15].
Among the earliest examples of viral continuous evolution
is the 1997 work of Molineux and coworkers using FX174, Similar phage propagation experiments were carried out
a bacteriophage capable of propagating using Escherichia by Molineux and coworkers using bacteriophage T7 to
coli or Salmonella typhimurium [12,13]. These studies high- study organismal phylogenetic histories [16]. To enhance
lighted the ability of this phage to rapidly adjust to novel the mutation rate, T7 phage was serially passaged in the
0
environments such as higher temperatures, as well as an presence of the chemical mutagen MNNG (N-methyl-N -
0
abnormally high degree of mutational convergence nitro-N -nitrosoguanidine), resulting in variants with
depending on selection conditions. Additionally, substan- differential restriction enzyme cleavage patterns than
tial improvements in phage fitness were observed over the wild-type phage. The correct phylogeny of the diver-
relatively short time frames, with an average of 1–2 ging phage populations could be determined using these
mutations per 24 hours (corresponding to 0.2–0.5% of cleavage patterns, supporting their method for phyloge-
the viral genome, and 0.003–0.005 mutations per gener- netic reconstruction and suggesting maximization of par-
ation per kilobase) in the absence of any added mutagens. simony as a promising method for determining ancestral
In an expansion of this work by Bull and coworkers, FX174 characteristics. While this approach addressed the need
phage was propagated on bacterial hosts under native for high mutagenesis rates during evolution, the selection
conditions for six months, corresponding to 13,000 phage was highly qualitative, requiring the accumulation of non-
generations [14]. Mutations continued to accumulate at a deleterious mutations that enabled restriction enzyme
constant rate for the majority of the experiment, suggesting profiling. A similar strategy was later used by the same
a potential arms race within the propagating phage pool. group to study the effects of successive severe population
The researchers speculated that this arms race was driven bottlenecking and expansion on viral fitness, demonstrat-
by the high concentration of phage with respect to host ing the remarkable plasticity of the T7 genome toward
Figure 2
Controller (auxostat)
Peristaltic Peristaltic pump Addition pump port Peristaltic Viral pump Evolution Only Syringe filter Sample Ventilation port collection port Culture inlet Media inlet Additives: Waste outlet inducers, Additive inlet mutagens, Additive Waste outlet antibiotics Fresh intlet Waste (depleted culture Sensor (auxostat): medium + cells medium density, pH, [O2], +/– virus) EtOH, nutrients
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Auxostats and chemostats. Fresh culture medium is pumped into a pre-sterilized container containing the microorganism of interest. Medium with
cells is pumped out of the culture container. The rates of medium input and output are held constant in a chemostat system, and the growth rate
is regulated by the composition of the medium. In an auxostat system, the medium flow rates are dynamically regulated by a controller in
response to measurements made in the growing culture, which correspond directly (turbidity meter) or indirectly (other sensors) to the culture
density. In schemes for viral continuous evolution, the auxostat or chemostat culture is pumped into a new vessel where the virus of interest is
supplied (cellstat). Both cultures can be supplemented with additives supplied through a dedicated inlet. Selection stringency can be regulated by
varying flow rates, changing temperature, or adding compounds to the auxostat, chemostat or cellstat. The depleted medium, cells and virus are
pumped to a waste container.
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2015, 24:1–10
4 Omics
mutations and the interdependence of the accumulated limitations. Phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE)
mutations in specific phage lineages [17]. These studies is a general system for the directed evolution of biomo-
also highlight the utility of user-defined mutagenesis lecules that relies on previously discussed methods for the
rates in continuous directed evolution, although chemical continued culturing of E. coli, can be used to evolve, in
mutagens generally offer narrow mutational spectra and principle, any activity that can be coupled to gene tran-
are potent carcinogens. scription in E. coli, and allows real-time modulation of