DOCSLIB.ORG

Stratigraphic Cross Sections of the Eocene Green River Formation In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stratigraphic Cross Sections of the Eocene Green River Formation In Chapter 5 Stratigraphic Cross Sections of the Eocene Green River Formation in the Click here to return to Green River Basin, Southwestern Volume Title Page Wyoming, Northwestern Colorado, and Northeastern Utah By Jesse G. Self, Robert T. Ryder, Ronald C. Johnson, Michael E. Brownfield, and Tracey J. Mercier Chapter 5 of 6 Oil Shale Resources of the Eocene Green River Formation, Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah By U.S. Geological Survey Oil Shale Assessment Team U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–DD U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Self, J.G., Ryder, R.T., Johnson, R.C., Brownfield, M.E., and Mercier, T.J., 2011, Stratigraphic cross sections of the Eocene Green River Formation in the Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming, northwestern Colorado, and north- eastern Utah, in U.S. Geological Survey Oil Shale Assessment Team, ed., Oil shale resources of the Eocene Green River Formation, Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–DD, chap. 5, 7 p., 24 plates. iii Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Stratigraphy of the Green River Formation, Wyoming .............................................................................1 Cross Sections................................................................................................................................................5 References Cited............................................................................................................................................6 Plates 1. Cross section A–A’ showing south to north correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, western Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ................ link 2. Cross section B–B’ showing south to north correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, central Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming .................. link 3. Cross section C–C ’ showing south to north correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, eastern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ................. link 4. Cross section D–D’ showing south to north correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, eastern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ................. link 5. Cross section E–E ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, southern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ............... link 6. Cross section F–F ’ showing west to east correlation the Green River and Wasatch Formations, southern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ............... link 7. Cross section G–G ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, central Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming .................. link 8. Cross section H–H ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, north-central Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ....... link 9. Cross section I–I ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, northern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ................ link 10. Cross section J–J ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, northern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ................ link 11. Cross section K–K ’ showing south to north correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, western Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming .................... link 12. Cross section L–L ’ showing south to north correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, western Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming .................... link 13. Cross section M–M ’ showing south to north correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, central Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming ...................... link 14. Cross section N–N ’ showing south to north correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, eastern Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming ..................... link 15. Cross section O–O ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, southern Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming .................. link 16. Cross section P–P ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, from southeastern Green River Basin to southeastern Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming ........................................................................... link 17. Cross section Q–Q ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, northern Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming ................... link iv 18. Cross section R–R ’ showing correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, north to south across central Green River Basin and east to west in Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming (after Roehler, 1991b) ...................... link 19. Cross section S–S ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, across central Green River Basin to western Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming (after Roehler, 1991b)....................................................... link 20. Cross section T–T ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, central Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming (after Roehler, 1990) ................................................................................................................. link 21. Cross section U–U ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, southern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming (after Roehler, 1991d) .............................................................................................................. link 22. Cross section V–V ’ showing west to east correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, Washakie Basin, southwestern Wyoming (after Roehler, 1991c) .............................................................................................................. link 23. Cross section W–W ’ showing north to south correlation of the Green River and Wasatch Formations, western Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming (after Roehler, 1992a) ......................................................................................................................... link 24. Map showing locations of stratigraphic cross sections in the Greater Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming ................................................................................... link Figures 1. Structure map of the Greater Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming and adjacent areas, showing major basinal areas and adjoining uplifts. ...........................2 2. Map showing distribution of oil shale-bearing rocks in the Eocene Green River Formation in southwestern Wyoming, northwestern Colorado, and northeastern Utah .................................................................................................................3 3. Diagram showing stratigraphic relations of Eocene rocks within the Greater Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming .............................................................4 Table 1. Names and definitions for the column headers for the spatial-data spreadsheet (Spatial_Information.xlsx) ....................................................................................5 Stratigraphic Cross Sections of the Eocene Green River Formation in the Green River Basin, Southwestern Wyoming, Northwestern Colorado, and Northeastern Utah By Jesse G. Self, Robert T. Ryder, Ronald C. Johnson, Michael E. Brownfield, and Tracy J. Mercier Introduction Stratigraphy of the Green River Formation, Wyoming For several decades, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has collected cores, drill cuttings, and other subsurface data from boreholes drilled to evaluate the oil shale deposits in the The Green River Formation consists of lacustrine and Eocene Green River Formation, as well as from oil and gas fluvial-lacustrine rocks that were deposited in and adjacent to tests, in the Greater Green River Basin of southwestern Wyo- the Eocene Lake Gosiute that covered much of southwestern ming, northwestern Colorado, and northeastern Utah (fig. 1). Wyoming, northwestern Colorado, and northeastern Utah The Greater Green River Basin (GGRB) is the name given to from roughly 52.5 to 47.5 Ma (Smith and others, 2008). The a group of five sub-basins. The names of these sub-basins and lake formed in a structural and sedimentary basin that formed their locations within the Greater Green River Basin are as during the Laramide orogeny, a major mountain-building epi- follows: (1) the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download File
    Chronology and Faunal Evolution of the Middle Eocene Bridgerian North American Land Mammal “Age”: Achieving High Precision Geochronology Kaori Tsukui Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2015 Kaori Tsukui All rights reserved ABSTRACT Chronology and Faunal Evolution of the Middle Eocene Bridgerian North American Land Mammal “Age”: Achieving High Precision Geochronology Kaori Tsukui The age of the Bridgerian/Uintan boundary has been regarded as one of the most important outstanding problems in North American Land Mammal “Age” (NALMA) biochronology. The Bridger Basin in southwestern Wyoming preserves one of the best stratigraphic records of the faunal boundary as well as the preceding Bridgerian NALMA. In this dissertation, I first developed a chronological framework for the Eocene Bridger Formation including the age of the boundary, based on a combination of magnetostratigraphy and U-Pb ID-TIMS geochronology. Within the temporal framework, I attempted at making a regional correlation of the boundary-bearing strata within the western U.S., and also assessed the body size evolution of three representative taxa from the Bridger Basin within the context of Early Eocene Climatic Optimum. Integrating radioisotopic, magnetostratigraphic and astronomical data from the early to middle Eocene, I reviewed various calibration models for the Geological Time Scale and intercalibration of 40Ar/39Ar data among laboratories and against U-Pb data, toward the community goal of achieving a high precision and well integrated Geological Time Scale. In Chapter 2, I present a magnetostratigraphy and U-Pb zircon geochronology of the Bridger Formation from the Bridger Basin in southwestern Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Wyoming
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WYOMING SELECTED REFERENCES USED TO CO~IPILE THE ~IETALLIC AND INDUSTRIAL MI ERALS ~IAP OF WYOMING by Ray E. Harris and W. Dan Hausel OPEN FILE REPORT 85-1 1985 This report has no~ been reviewed for conformity with the editorial standards of the Geological Survey of Wyoming. CONTENTS District or Region Page Introduction . iii Absaroka Mountains ...........................•.......................... 1 Aladdin District . 1 Barlow Canyon District . 1 Bear Lodge District . 1 Big Creek District . 2 Bighorn Basin . 2 Bighorn Mountains ...•................................................... 3 Black Hills . 4 Carlile District ...........•............................................ 5 Centennial Ridge District . 5 Clay Spur District ...................................•.................. 5 Colony District . 6 Cooke City - New World District . 6 Copper Mountain District .........................................•...... 7 Cooper Hill District . 7 Crooks Gap-Green Mountain District . 7 Deer Creek District . 8 Denver Basin . 8 Elkhorn Creek District . 8 Esterbrook District . 8 Gas Hills District . 8 Gold Hill District . 9 Grand Encampment District . 9 Granite Mountains . 9 Green River Basin ................................•...................... 10 Gras Ventre Mountains ..................•...............•................ 11 Hanna Basin . 11 Hartville Uplift . 12 Hulett Creek District .........................................•......... 13 Iron Mountain District . 13 Iron Mountain Kimberlite District ......•...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Correlation Chart for Western Colorado and Northwestern New Mexico
    New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 32nd Field Conference, Western Slope Colorado, 1981 75 STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION CHART FOR WESTERN COLORADO AND NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO M. E. MacLACHLAN U.S. Geological Survey Denver, Colorado 80225 INTRODUCTION De Chelly Sandstone (or De Chelly Sandstone Member of the The stratigraphic nomenclature applied in various parts of west- Cutler Formation) of the west side of the basin is thought to ern Colorado, northwestern New Mexico, and a small part of east- correlate with the Glorieta Sandstone of the south side of the central Utah is summarized in the accompanying chart (fig. 1). The basin. locations of the areas, indicated by letters, are shown on the index map (fig. 2). Sources of information used in compiling the chart are Cols. B.-C. shown by numbers in brackets beneath the headings for the col- Age determinations on the Hinsdale Formation in parts of the umns. The numbers are keyed to references in an accompanying volcanic field range from 4.7 to 23.4 m.y. on basalts and 4.8 to list. Ages where known are shown by numbers in parentheses in 22.4 m.y. on rhyolites (Lipman, 1975, p. 6, p. 90-100). millions of years after the rock name or in parentheses on the line The early intermediate-composition volcanics and related rocks separating two chronostratigraphic units. include several named units of limited areal extent, but of simi- No Quaternary rocks nor small igneous bodies, such as dikes, lar age and petrology—the West Elk Breccia at Powderhorn; the have been included on this chart.
    [Show full text]
  • Eocene Green River Formation, Western United States
    Synoptic reconstruction of a major ancient lake system: Eocene Green River Formation, western United States M. Elliot Smith* Alan R. Carroll Brad S. Singer Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, 1215 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA ABSTRACT Members. Sediment accumulation patterns than being confi ned to a single episode of arid thus refl ect basin-center–focused accumula- climate. Evaporative terminal sinks were Numerous 40Ar/39Ar experiments on sani- tion rates when the basin was underfi lled, initially located in the Greater Green River dine and biotite from 22 ash beds and 3 and supply-limited accumulation when the and Piceance Creek Basins (51.3–48.9 Ma), volcaniclastic sand beds from the Greater basin was balanced fi lled to overfi lled. Sedi- then gradually migrated southward to the Green River, Piceance Creek, and Uinta ment accumulation in the Uinta Basin, at Uinta Basin (47.1–45.2 Ma). This history is Basins of Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah Indian Canyon, Utah, was relatively con- likely related to progressive southward con- constrain ~8 m.y. of the Eocene Epoch. Mul- stant at ~150 mm/k.y. during deposition of struction of the Absaroka Volcanic Prov- tiple analyses were conducted per sample over 5 m.y. of both evaporative and fl uctuat- ince, which constituted a major topographic using laser fusion and incremental heating ing profundal facies, which likely refl ects the and thermal anomaly that contributed to a techniques to differentiate inheritance, 40Ar basin-margin position of the measured sec- regional north to south hydrologic gradient. loss, and 39Ar recoil.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Occurrence and Development Potential Report Rawlins Resource
    CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Lands Involved and Record Data ....................................................................................1-2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGY ...............................................................................................2-1 2.1 Physiography....................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Stratigraphy ......................................................................................................................2-3 2.2.1 Precambrian Era....................................................................................................2-3 2.2.2 Paleozoic Era ........................................................................................................2-3 2.2.2.1 Cambrian System...................................................................................2-3 2.2.2.2 Ordovician, Silurian, and Devonian Systems ........................................2-5 2.2.2.3 Mississippian System.............................................................................2-5 2.2.2.4 Pennsylvanian System...........................................................................2-5 2.2.2.5 Permian System.....................................................................................2-6
    [Show full text]
  • Green River Composite Total Petroleum System, Southwestern Wyoming Volume Title Page Province, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah
    Chapter 12 Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Petroleum Resources in the Wasatch– Green River Composite Total Petroleum System, Southwestern Wyoming Volume Title Page Province, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah By Stephen B. Roberts Chapter 12 of Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the Southwestern Wyoming Province, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah By USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–D U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado: Version 1, 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Manuscript approved for publication May 10, 2005 ISBN= 0-607-99027-9 Contents Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid and Early Post-Flood Mammalian Diversification Videncede in the Green River Formation
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 6 Print Reference: Pages 449-457 Article 36 2008 Rapid and Early Post-Flood Mammalian Diversification videncedE in the Green River Formation John H. Whitmore Cedarville University Kurt P. Wise Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Whitmore, John H. and Wise, Kurt P. (2008) "Rapid and Early Post-Flood Mammalian Diversification Evidenced in the Green River Formation," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 6 , Article 36. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol6/iss1/36 In A. A. Snelling (Ed.) (2008). Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Creationism (pp. 449–457). Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship and Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research. Rapid and Early Post-Flood Mammalian Diversification Evidenced in the Green River Formation John H. Whitmore, Ph.D., Cedarville University, 251 N. Main Street, Cedarville, OH 45314 Kurt P. Wise, Ph.D., Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2825 Lexington Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashley National Forest Assessment: Air, Soil, and Watershed Resources Report
    Ashley National Forest Assessment Air, Soil, and Watershed Resources Report Prepared by: Greg Bevenger Hydrologist, WyoHydro Professional Hydrology Services for: Ashley National Forest September 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichnotaxonomy of the Eocene Green River Formation
    Ichnotaxonomy of the Eocene Green River Formation, Soldier Summit and Spanish Fork Canyon, Uinta Basin, Utah: Interpreting behaviors, lifestyles, and erecting the Cochlichnus Ichnofacies By © 2018 Joshua D. Hogue B.S. Old Dominion University, 2013 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Chair: Dr. Stephen T. Hasiotis Dr. Paul Selden Dr. Georgios Tsoflias Date Defended: May 1, 2018 ii The thesis committee for Joshua D. Hogue certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Ichnotaxonomy of the Eocene Green River Formation, Soldier Summit and Spanish Fork Canyon, Uinta Basin, Utah: Interpreting behaviors, lifestyles, and erecting the Cochlichnus Ichnofacies Chair: Dr. Stephen T. Hasiotis Date Approved: May 1, 2018 iii ABSTRACT The Eocene Green River Formation in the Uinta Basin, Utah, has a diverse ichnofauna. Nineteen ichnogenera and 26 ichnospecies were identified: Acanthichnus cursorius, Alaripeda lofgreni, c.f. Aquatilavipes isp., Aulichnites (A. parkerensis and A. tsouloufeidos isp. nov.), Aviadactyla (c.f. Av. isp. and Av. vialovi), Avipeda phoenix, Cochlichnus (C. anguineus and C. plegmaeidos isp. nov.), Conichnus conichnus, Fuscinapeda texana, Glaciichnium liebegastensis, Glaroseidosichnus ign. nov. gierlowskii isp. nov., Gruipeda (G. fuenzalidae and G. gryponyx), Midorikawapeda ign. nov. semipalmatus isp. nov., Planolites montanus, Presbyorniformipes feduccii, Protovirgularia dichotoma, Sagittichnus linki, Treptichnus (T. bifurcus, T. pedum, and T. vagans), and Tsalavoutichnus ign. nov. (Ts. ericksonii isp. nov. and Ts. leptomonopati isp. nov.). Four ichnocoenoses are represented by the ichnofossils—Cochlichnus, Conichnus, Presbyorniformipes, and Treptichnus—representing dwelling, feeding, grazing, locomotion, predation, pupation, and resting behaviors of organisms in environments at and around the sediment-water-air interface.
    [Show full text]
  • SWEETWATER COUNTY WYOMING Rock Springs & Green River
    SWEETWATER COUNTY WYOMING Rock Springs & Green River Explore 100s of miles The of trails and shoreline. Flaming Soak up the sunshine Gorge and catch the “Big One.” tourwyoming.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 2-3 SWEETWATER COUNTY MAP 23-24 EVENTS CALENDAR 25-27 FLAMING GORGE COUNTRY 4-9 TOWNS 28 SEEDSKADEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 5 ROCK SPRINGS 29 PILOT BUTTE WILD HORSES 6 GREEN RIVER 7 SUPERIOR 30-37 INDOOR/OUTDOOR RECREATION & PARKS 7 WAMSUTTER 31 KILLPECKER SAND DUNES 8 HISTORIC SOUTH PASS 32 ATV/OHV 9 EDEN VALLEY 33 MOUNTAIN BIKING 9 INDUSTRY IN SWEETWATER COUNTY 34-35 ADVENTURES ON THE GREEN RIVER 35 GREEN RIVER RECREATION CENTER 10-16 HISTORY, MUSEUMS & TRAILS 36 ROLLING GREEN RIVER COUNTRY CLUB 11 ROCK SPRINGS HISTORICAL MUSEUM 36 WHITE MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE 12 WWCC NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM 37 ROCK SPRINGS FAMILY RECREATION CENTER 13 SWEETWATER COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM 37 ROCK SPRINGS CIVIC CENTER 14-15 HISTORIC PIONEER TRAILS 38 SWEETWATER COUNTY PARKS 16 COMMUNITY FINE ARTS CENTER 39 SCENIC DRIVES 17-29 SIGHTSEEING 40-42 ITINERARIES 18 ROCK FORMATIONS 43 GUIDED TOURS 19 WHITE MOUNTAIN PETROGLYPHS 44-45 NATIONAL PARKS 20 FOSSILS OF LAKE GOSIUTE 46-47 ACCOMMODATIONS 20 THE RELIANCE TIPPLE 48-52 DINING & NIGHTLIFE 21-22 SWEETWATER EVENTS COMPLEX ACTIVITY ICONS KEY SIGHTSEEING CAMPING FISHING HIKING BIKING GOLF WATER SPORTS TourWyoming.com create adventure The Best Vacations Don’t Just Happen When You Get There. They Happen Along the Way. Whether Sweetwater County is your final Wyoming destination or you’re visiting on the way to the National Parks, there are countless ways to create an adventure of your own.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Portion of the Fish Lake Plateau, Utah
    GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE FISH LAKE PLATEAU, UTAH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State - University By DONALD PAUL MCGOOKEY, B.S., M.A* The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by Edmund M." Spieker Adviser Department of Geology CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION. ................................ 1 Locations and accessibility ........ 2 Physical features ......... _ ................... 5 Previous w o r k ......... 10 Field work and the geologic map ........ 12 Acknowledgements.................... 13 STRATIGRAPHY........................................ 15 General features................................ 15 Jurassic system......................... 16 Arapien shale .............................. 16 Twist Gulch formation...................... 13 Morrison (?) formation...................... 19 Cretaceous system .............................. 20 General character and distribution.......... 20 Indianola group ............................ 21 Mancos shale. ................... 24 Star Point sandstone................ 25 Blackhawk formation ........................ 26 Definition, lithology, and extent .... 26 Stratigraphic relations . ............ 23 Age . .............................. 23 Price River formation...................... 31 Definition, lithology, and extent .... 31 Stratigraphic relations ................ 34 A g e .................................... 37 Cretaceous and Tertiary systems . ............ 37 North Horn formation. ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Scenery Assessment Report for the Ashley National Forest, Public Draft
    Ashley National Forest Assessment Scenery Report Public Draft Prepared by: Ryan Buerkle Forest Recreation Program Manager for: Ashley National Forest May 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]