Helix Unwinding and Base Flipping Enable Human MTERF1 to Terminate Mitochondrial Transcription
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Helix Unwinding and Base Flipping Enable Human MTERF1 to Terminate Mitochondrial Transcription Elena Yakubovskaya,1,2 Edison Mejia,1,2 James Byrnes,1 Elena Hambardjieva,1 and Miguel Garcia-Diaz1,* 1Department of Pharmacological Sciences. Stony Brook University. BST 7-169. Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 2These authors contributed equally to this work *Correspondence: [email protected] DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018 SUMMARY instance in response to estrogen (Klinge, 2008). In addition, mito- chondria contain their own family of dedicated transcriptional Defects in mitochondrial gene expression are associ- regulators: the mterf proteins. The mterf (for mitochondrial ated with aging and disease. Mterf proteins have termination factor) family of proteins contains four members been implicated in modulating transcription, replica- (MTERF1–4) all of which share homology to MTERF1, a protein tion and protein synthesis. We have solved the originally identified as a factor responsible for mitochondrial structure of a member of this family, the human mito- transcriptional termination. These proteins have been implicated chondrial transcriptional terminator MTERF1, bound in mitochondrial transcription, the coordination between tran- scription and replication and the regulation of mitochondrial to dsDNA containing the termination sequence. The protein synthesis (Linder et al., 2005; Park et al., 2007; Roberti structure indicates that upon sequence recognition et al., 2009; Pellegrini et al., 2009). MTERF1 is the canonical MTERF1 unwinds the DNA molecule, promoting transcriptional terminator and was originally identified as eversion of three nucleotides. Base flipping is critical a factor responsible for terminating heavy strand transcription for stable binding and transcriptional termination. at a specific site at the leu-tRNA (Kruse et al., 1989), thereby Additional structural and biochemical results provide modulating the ratio of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA to mRNA insight into the DNA binding mechanism and explain (Roberti et al., 2009). It was later shown that in this context, how MTERF1 recognizes its target sequence. Finally, besides acting as a termination factor, MTERF1 appears to be we have demonstrated that the mitochondrial patho- capable of stimulating transcriptional initiation (Martin et al., genic G3249A and G3244A mutations interfere with 2005). Moreover, it has been proposed that MTERF1 can key interactions for sequence recognition, elimi- mediate the formation of a loop in mitochondrial DNA to promote efficient rRNA synthesis (Martin et al., 2005), although the ability nating termination. Our results provide insight into of MTERF1 to bind to the HSP region is controversial (Park et al., the role of mterf proteins and suggest a link between 2007). Like other mterf proteins, MTERF1 appears to be multi- mitochondrial disease and the regulation of mito- functional, and a recent report has implicated it in the control chondrial transcription. of mitochondrial replication pausing (Hyva¨ rinen et al., 2007). All these observations are however based on in vitro experiments, INTRODUCTION and no in vivo evidence exists to support any of these proposed roles. Interestingly, the pathogenic A3243G MELAS mutation Mitochondrial transcription is responsible for expression of 13 was shown to decrease the ability of MTERF1 to terminate proteins encoded in the mitochondrial DNA as well as synthesis transcription in vitro (Hess et al., 1991) and yet no obvious tran- of two rRNAs and 22 tRNAs (Anderson et al., 1981). Transcription scriptional alterations are observed in cells carrying this MELAS originates from two promoters located in the regulatory D loop, mutation (Chomyn et al., 1992). A lack of structural information a heavy strand and a light strand promoter (HSP and LSP), that on this family of proteins has contributed to maintain these are responsible for transcription of the heavy and light strands, uncertainties about their cellular role. Sequence alignments led respectively (Asin-Cayuela and Gustafsson, 2007; Gaspari et al., to the suggestion that they are modular leucine-zipper contain- 2004; Scarpulla, 2008). Initiation is dependent on the RNA poly- ing proteins (Fernandez-Silva et al., 1997; Roberti et al., 2006), merase, POLRMT, and two transcription factors, TFAM and and that has been suggested to be the basis of their ability to TFB2M (Sologub et al., 2009; Metodiev et al., 2009), while bind DNA (Roberti et al., 2009). POLRMT is sufficient for elongation. Hence, mitochondrial tran- In this paper, we have structurally characterized MTERF1 scription can be regulated by modulating the expression of the bound to its recognition sequence in the leucine tRNA and genes responsible for the process itself (Scarpulla, 2006; Hock have analyzed its mechanism of binding. Our results unexpect- and Kralli, 2009), but some evidence suggests that transcrip- edly show that MTERF1 does not bind DNA via leucine-zippers, tional regulation can occur within the mitochondria as well, for but rather promotes transcriptional termination through a novel 982 Cell 141, 982–993, June 11, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. A B Figure 1. MTERF1 Is a Modular Protein (A) Amino acid alignment of MTERF1 proteins in different species. Invariant residues are white over a black background. Conserved residues are bold. The numbering corresponds to human MTERF1. Asterisks indicate residues that stack with everted nucleotides and dots indicate resi- dues involved in sequence recognition. Horizontal black bars represent a helices and dotted lines represent 310 helices. Hs, Homo sapiens; fc, felis catus; ss, sus scrofa; ec, equus caballus; bt, bos taurus; mm, Mus musculus; rn, rattus norvegicus; oa, ornithorhynchus anatinus; dr, danio rerio. (B) Overview of the MTERF1 fold. The structure is shown in the absence of DNA. Mterf motifs are color coded as in (A). (C) Overlay of the 8 mterf motifs. The rmsd between the first (transparent red, ribbon repre- sentation) and each of the other repeats ranges between 1.0 and 3.3 A˚ for 24 C-a atoms (the C D average is 2.5 A˚ ). Each repeat is color coded as in (B). (D) Hydrophobic interactions stabilize each mterf repeat. The second mterf motif is shown in ribbon representation. The hydrophobic residues are shown in ball-and-stick representation with their Van der Waals surface in yellow. See also Figure S1. DNA binding mode. Additionally, they provide insight into how diffracted to 2.2A˚ and contained one molecule of MTERF1 bound MTERF1 achieves sequence recognition, and provides clues to to DNA in the asymmetric unit. The final density was of sufficient understand the biological roles of mterf family proteins. We quality to build most of the protein (residues 73 to 396; Figure 1 have also analyzed a number of pathogenic mitochondrial DNA and Figure S1 available online) and all 22 base pairs of DNA. mutations for their ability to interfere with MTERF1 binding and transcriptional termination. We have shown that two mutations, Overall Structure G3249A that causes a variant of Kearns-Sayre syndrome MTERF1 adopts a fold that is very different from previously (Seneca et al., 2001) and G3242A that is associated with an proposed models (Fernandez-Silva et al., 1997; Figure 1B). uncharacterized mitochondrial disorder (Mimaki et al., 2009), Consistent with predictions based on its primary sequence interfere with protein-DNA interactions that are key for sequence (Fernandez-Silva et al., 1997; Roberti et al., 2006), MTERF1 recognition by MTERF1 and as a consequence eliminate its displays a modular architecture. Dali (Holm et al., 2008) and De- transcriptional termination activity. jaVu (Kleywegt and Jones, 1997) were unable to identify signifi- cant structural homology with any protein in the PDB. MTERF1 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION is an all-a-helical protein composed of 19 a helices and 7 310 helices that is structured around a motif (two a helices followed Structural Determination by a 310 helix; hence referred to as the mterf motif) that is In order to investigate how MTERF1 is able to recognize specific repeated throughout the structure (Figure 1B). This structural sequences in the mitochondrial genome as well as the mecha- arrangement is remarkably similar to that seen in other all-alpha nism by which it can modulate transcription we decided to helical regions of proteins such as repeats of armadillo (ARM), crystallize the full-length human protein (minus the N-terminal HEAT (Groves and Barford, 1999) and PUM/PUF motifs (Lu mitochondrial localization sequence; Figure 1A) bound to the et al., 2009). In all these cases the protein fold consists of leu-tRNA sequence responsible for termination of transcription a number of repeats of more or less conserved a-helical motifs. to which MTERF1 binds with high affinity (Nam and Kang, Interestingly, PUM/PUF motifs are the basis of RNA binding in 2005). We expressed and purified human MTERF1 from E. coli PUMILIO proteins (Lu et al., 2009) while the HEAT motifs in cells and obtained crystals of the protein in complex with a DNA PK-cs have been suggested to play a role in double 22-mer double stranded substrate (residues 3232–3253 of the stranded DNA binding (Sibanda et al., 2010). human mitochondrial DNA). In order to solve the structure taking The MTERF1 fold contains 8 mterf motifs and an additional advantage of Multiwavelength Anomalous Dispersion phasing distorted motif in the C terminus (Figure 1C). Within each motif, (Hendrickson and Ogata, 1997) we also crystallized MTERF1 in several hydrophobic residues create