sex differences

BY DOREEN KIMURA in the brain

EN AND WOMEN DIFFER not only in their physical attributes and reproductive function but MEN AND WOMEN also in many other characteristics, including the DISPLAY PATTERNS OF way they solve intellectual problems. For the past few decades, it has been ideologically fashionable BEHAVIORAL Mto insist that these behavioral differences are minimal and are the consequence of variations in experience during development AND COGNITIVE DIFFERENCES before and after adolescence. Evidence accumulated more re- THAT REFLECT cently, however, suggests that the effects of sex hormones on brain organization occur so early in life that from the start the VARYING HORMONAL environment is acting on differently wired brains in boys and girls. Such effects make evaluating the role of experience, inde- INFLUENCES ON BRAIN pendent of physiological predisposition, a difficult if not dubious DEVELOPMENT task. The biological bases of sex differences in brain and behav- ior have become much better known through increasing num- bers of behavioral, neurological and endocrinological studies. We know, for instance, from observations of both humans DIVERGING PLAY STYLES of boys and girls—boys’ and nonhumans that males are more aggressive than females, preference for mock fighting over playing house— that young males engage in more rough-and-tumble play than may be dictated by hormonal differences. females and that females are more nurturing. We also know that in general males are better at a variety of spatial or navi- gational tasks. How do these and other sex differences come about? Much of our information and many of our ideas about how sexual differentiation takes place derive from research on animals. From such investigations, it appears that perhaps the most important factor in the differentiation of males and fe- males and indeed in differentiating individuals within a sex is the level of exposure to various sex hormones early in life. In most mammals, including humans, the developing or- ganism has the potential to be male or female. Producing a male, however, is a complex process. When a Y chromosome is present, testes, or male gonads, form. This development is the critical first step toward becoming a male. When no Y chro- mosome is present, ovaries form. Testes produce male hormones, or androgens (testosterone chief among them), which are responsible not only for trans- formation of the genitals into male organs but also for organi- zation of corresponding male behaviors early in life. As with genital formation, the intrinsic tendency that occurs in the ab- sence of masculinizing hormonal influence, according to semi- nal studies by Robert W. Goy of the University of Wisconsin, is to develop female genital structures and behavior. Female anatomy and probably most behavior associated with females are thus the default modes in the absence of androgens. If a rodent with functional male genitals is deprived of an- drogens immediately after birth (either by castration or by the

32 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN Updated from Men, Summer 1999 (Scientific American Presents) COPYRIGHT 2002 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. administration of a compound that blocks androgens), male parallel sex differences in a clump of nerve cells in the human sexual behavior, such as mounting, will be reduced, and more brain—parts of the interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypo- female sexual behavior, such as lordosis (arching of the back thalamus—that is larger in men than in women. Even sexual when receptive to coitus), will be expressed. Likewise, if an- orientation and gender identity have been related to anatomi- drogens are administered to a female directly after birth, she cal variation in the hypothalamus. Other researchers, Jiang- will display more male sexual behavior and less female behav- Ning Zhou of the Netherlands Institute of Brain Research and ior in adulthood. These lifelong effects of early exposure to sex his colleagues there and at Free University in Amsterdam, ob- hormones are characterized as “organizational” because they served another part of the hypothalamus to be smaller in male- appear to alter brain function permanently during a critical pe- to-female transsexuals than in a male control group. These find- ) riod in prenatal or early postnatal development. Administering ings are consistent with suggestions that sexual orientation and right ( the same sex hormones at later stages or in the adult has no sim- gender identity have a significant biological component. ilar effect. Corbis Not all the behaviors that distinguish males are categorized at the same time, however. Organization by androgens of the male-typical behaviors of mounting and of rough-and-tumble play, for example, occur at different times prenatally in rhesus ); DIRK DOUGLAS monkeys. below ( The area in the brain that regulates female and male repro- ductive behavior is the hypothalamus. This tiny structure at the Stone base of the brain connects to the pituitary, the master endocrine gland. It has been shown that a region of the hypothalamus is visibly larger in male rats than in females and that this size dif-

SUE ANN MILLER ference is under hormonal control. Scientists have also found

Hormones and Intellect WHAT OF DIFFERENCES in intellectual function between men and women? Major sex differences in function seem to lie in pat- terns of ability rather than in overall level of intelligence (mea- sured as IQ), although some researchers, such as Richard Lynn of the University of Ulster in Northern Ireland, have argued that there exists a small IQ difference favoring human males. Differ- ences in intellectual pattern refer to the fact that people have dif- ferent intellectual strengths. For example, some people are espe- cially good at using words, whereas others are better at dealing with external stimuli, such as identifying an object in a different orientation. Two individuals may have differing cognitive abili- ties within the same level of general intelligence. Sex differences in problem solving have been systematical- ly studied in adults in laboratory situations. On average, men perform better than women at certain spatial tasks. In particu- lar, men seem to have an advantage in tests that require the sub- ject to imagine rotating an object or manipulating it in some other way. They also outperform women in mathematical rea- soning tests and in navigating their way through a route. Fur-

www.sciam.com THE HIDDEN MIND 33 COPYRIGHT 2002 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. Problem-Solving Problem-Solving precision manual tasks, such as placing Tasks Favoring Tasks Favoring pegs in designated holes on a board. In examining the nature of sex differ- Men Women ences in navigating routes, one study Men tend to perform better than Women tend to perform better than found that men completed a computer women on certain spatial tasks. men on tests of perceptual speed simulation of a maze or labyrinth task They do well on tests that involve in which subjects must rapidly more quickly and with fewer errors than mentally rotating an object or identify matching items—for women did. Another study by different manipulating it in some fashion, example, pairing the house on the researchers used a path on a tabletop such as imagining turning this far left with its twin: map to measure route learning. Their re- three-dimensional object sults showed that although men learned the route in fewer trials and with fewer errors, women remembered more of the landmarks, such as pictures of different types of buildings, than men did. These In addition, women remember results and others suggest that women or determining where the holes whether an object, or a series of tend to use landmarks as a strategy to punched in a folded piece of paper objects, has been displaced: orient themselves in everyday life more will fall when the paper is unfolded: than men do. Other findings seemed also to point to female superiority in landmark memory. Researchers tested the ability of individu- als to recall objects and their locations When they are read a story, para- within a confined space—such as in a Men also are more accurate than graph or a list of unrelated words, room or on a tabletop. In these studies, women at target-directed motor women demonstrate better recall: women were better able to remember skills, such as guiding or intercept- whether items had changed places or not. ing projectiles: Dog, shadow, hamburger, Other investigators found that women cloud, flower, eyelash, pencil, paper, water, light, were superior at a memory task in which fork, road, building ... they had to remember the locations of pictures on cards that were turned over in Women do better on precision pairs. At this kind of object location, in manual tasks—that is, those contrast to other spatial tasks, women ap- They do better at matching lines involving fine-motor coordination— pear to have the advantage. with identical slopes: such as placing the pegs in holes It is important to keep in mind that on a board: some of the average sex differences in cog- nition vary from slight to quite large and that men and women overlap enormous- ly on many cognitive tests that show av- erage differences. For example, whereas And men tend to do better than women perform better than men in both women on tests of mathematical And women do better than men on verbal memory (recalling words from lists reasoning: mathematical calculation tests: or paragraphs) and verbal fluency (find- ing words that begin with a specific let- If only 60 percent of ter), we find a large difference in memo- 77 14 x 3 – 17 + 52 1,100 seedlings will survive, how ry ability but only a small disparity for the many must be planted to 43 2 (15 + 3) + 12 – 15 obtain 660 trees? 3 fluency tasks. On the whole, variation be- tween men and women tends to be small- er than deviations within each sex, but very large differences between the groups ther, men exhibit more accuracy in tests that challenge the person to find words do exist—in men’s high level of visual- of target-directed motor skills—that is, in that begin with a specific letter or fulfill spatial targeting ability, for one. guiding or intercepting projectiles. some other constraint. They also tend to Although it used to be thought that Women, on average, excel on tests be better than men at rapidly identifying sex differences in problem solving did not

that measure recall of words and on tests matching items and performing certain appear until puberty, the accumulated DOREEN KIMURA AND JOHN MENGEL

34 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN THE HIDDEN MIND COPYRIGHT 2002 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. SPATIAL Women Men 1.2 0.8 High evidence now suggests that some cogni- 0.4 Low testosterone testosterone tive and skill differences are present 0

st Score Low –0.4 High much earlier. For example, researchers Te testosterone –0.8 testosterone have found that three- and four-year-old –1.2 boys were better at targeting and at men- tally rotating figures within a clock face PERCEPTUAL SPEED 1.0 than girls of the same age were. Prepu- 0.6 Low bescent girls, however, excelled at recall- High 0.2 testosterone testosterone ing lists of words.

st Score –0.2 Low

Te High Male and female rodents have also –0.6 testosterone testosterone been found to solve problems differently. –1.0 Christina L. Williams of Duke Universi- TESTOSTERONE LEVELS can affect performance on some tests [see boxes on opposite page for examples ty has shown that female rats have a of tests]. Women with high levels of testosterone perform better on spatial tasks (top) than women greater tendency to use landmarks in spa- with low levels do, but men with low levels outperform men with high levels. On a test of perceptual speed tial learning tasks, as it appears women in which women usually excel (bottom), no relation was found between testosterone and performance. do. In Williams’s experiment, female rats used landmark cues, such as pictures on dition also unexpectedly appeared in the levels, the better the spatial scores. Rather the wall, in preference to geometric cues: offspring of pregnant women who took studies point to some optimal level of an- angles and the shape of the room, for in- various synthetic steroids. Although the drogen (in the low male range) for maxi- stance. If no landmarks were available, consequent masculinization of the geni- mal spatial ability. This finding may also however, females used the geometric tals can be corrected by surgery and drug hold for men and math reasoning; in one cues. In contrast, males did not use land- therapy can stop the overproduction of study, low-androgen men tested higher. marks at all, preferring geometric cues al- androgens, the effects of prenatal expo- most exclusively. sure on the brain are not reversed. The Biology of Math Sheri A. Berenbaum, while at South- SUCH FINDINGS are relevant to the Hormones and Behavior ern Illinois University at Carbondale, and suggestion by Camilla P. Benbow, now at WILLIAMS ALSO FOUND that hor- Melissa Hines, then at the University of Vanderbilt University, that high mathe- monal manipulation during the critical California at Los Angeles, observed the matical ability has a significant biological period could alter these behaviors. De- play behavior of CAH girls and com- determinant. Benbow and her colleagues priving newborn males of sex hormones pared it with that of their male and fe- have reported consistent sex differences in by castrating them or administering hor- male siblings. Given a choice of trans- mathematical reasoning ability that favor mones to newborn females resulted in a portation and construction toys, dolls males. In mathematically talented youth, complete reversal of sex-typed behaviors and kitchen supplies, or books and board the differences were especially sharp at in the adult animals. Treated males be- games, the CAH girls preferred the more the upper end of the distribution, where haved like females and treated females, typically masculine toys—for example, males vastly outnumbered females. The like males. they played with cars for the same same has been found for the Putnam com- Structural differences may parallel amount of time that boys did. Both the petition, a very demanding mathematics behavioral ones. Lucia F. Jacobs, while at CAH girls and the boys differed from un- examination. Benbow argues that these the University of Pittsburgh, discovered affected girls in their patterns of choice. differences are not readily explained by that the hippocampus—a region thought Berenbaum also found that CAH girls socialization. to be involved in spatial learning—is larg- had greater interest in male-typical activ- It is important to keep in mind that the er in several male species of rodents than ities and careers. Because there is every relation between natural hormone levels in females. At present, there are insuffi- reason to think parents would be at least and problem solving is based on correla- cient data on possible sex differences in as likely to encourage feminine prefer- tional data. Although some form of con- hippocampal size in human subjects. ences in their CAH daughters as in their nection between the two measures exists, One of the most compelling areas of unaffected daughters, these findings sug- we do not necessarily know how the as- evidence for hormonally influenced sex gest that these preferences were altered sociation is determined, nor do we know differences in humans comes from stud- by the early hormonal environment. what its causal basis is. We also know lit- ies of girls exposed to excess androgens Other researchers also found that in the prenatal or neonatal stage. The spatial abilities that are typically better in DOREEN KIMURA studies the neural and production of abnormally large quanti- males are enhanced in CAH girls. But in hormonal basis of human intellectual ties of adrenal androgens can occur be- CAH boys the reverse was reported. functions. She is visiting professor in cause of a genetic defect in a condition Such studies suggest that although lev- psychology at called congenital adrenal hyperplasia els of androgen relate to spatial ability, it in and a fellow of the THE AUTHOR

DOREEN KIMURA (CAH). Before the 1970s a similar con- is not simply the case that the higher the Royal Society of Canada.

www.sciam.com THE HIDDEN MIND 35 COPYRIGHT 2002 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. tle at present about the relation between test level remains to be seen through fur- brain hemisphere sometimes has less of adult levels of hormones and those in ear- ther research. an effect in women than the comparable ly life, when abilities appear to become or- A long history of studying people with injury in men does. My own data on pa- ganized in the nervous system. damage to one half of their brain indicates tients with damage to one hemisphere of One of the most intriguing findings in that in most people the left hemisphere of the brain suggest that for functions such adults is that cognitive patterns may re- the brain is critical for speech and the right as basic speech and spatial ability, there main sensitive to hormonal fluctuations for certain perceptual and spatial func- are no major sex differences in hemi- throughout life. Elizabeth Hampson of tions. Researchers studying sex differ- spheric asymmetry, although there may be the University of Western showed ences have widely assumed that the right such disparities in certain more abstract that women’s performances at certain and left hemispheres of the brain are more abilities, such as defining words. tasks changed throughout the menstrual asymmetrically organized for speech and If the known overall differences be- cycle as levels of estrogen varied. High spatial functions in men than in women. tween men and women in spatial ability levels of the hormone were associated not This belief rests on several lines of re- were related to differing dependence on the only with relatively depressed spatial abil- search. Parts of the corpus callosum, a right brain hemisphere for such functions, ity but also with enhanced speech and major neural system connecting the two then damage to that hemisphere might be manual skill tasks. In addition, I have ob- hemispheres, as well as another connec- expected to have a more devastating ef- served seasonal fluctuations in spatial tor, the anterior commissure, appear to be fect on spatial performance in men. My ability in men: their performance is better larger in women, which may permit bet- laboratory has studied the ability of pa- in the spring, when testosterone levels are ter communication between hemispheres. tients with damage to one hemisphere of lower. Whether these hormonally linked Perceptual techniques that measure brain the brain to visualize the rotation of cer- fluctuations in intellectual ability repre- asymmetry in normal-functioning people tain objects. As expected, for both sexes, sent useful evolutionary adaptations or sometimes show smaller asymmetries in those with damage to the right hemi- merely the highs and lows of an average women than in men, and damage to one sphere got lower scores on these tests than those with damage to the left hemisphere did. Also, as anticipated, women did not do as well as men on this test. Damage to the right hemisphere, however, had no greater effect on men than on women. The results of this study and others suggest that the normal differences be- tween men and women on rotational and line orientation tasks need not be the re- sult of different degrees of dependence on the right hemisphere. Some other brain systems may be mediating the higher per- formance by men. Patterns of Function ANOTHER BRAIN difference between the sexes has been shown for speech and certain manual functions. Women incur aphasia (impairment of the power to pro- 100 PERFORMANCE duce and understand speech) more often 90 Males after anterior damage than after posteri- 80 or damage to the brain. In men, posteri- Females 70 or damage more often affects speech. A

(percent) 60 rrect Answers rrect similar pattern is seen in apraxia, difficul-

Co 50 ty in selecting appropriate hand move- 40 LEFT RIGHT ments, such as showing how to manipu- Hemispheric Damage late a particular object or copying the movements of the experimenter. Women seldom experience apraxia after left pos- RIGHT HEMISPHERE DAMAGE affects spatial ability to the same degree in both sexes (graph), terior damage, whereas men often do. suggesting that women and men rely equally on that hemisphere for certain spatial tasks. In one test of spatial-rotation performance, photographs of a three-dimensional object must be matched Men also incur aphasia from left hemi-

to one of two mirror images of the same object. sphere damage more often than women DOREEN KIMURA

36 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN THE HIDDEN MIND COPYRIGHT 2002 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. INCIDENCE OF APHASIA Motor cortex Women 65% do. One explanation suggests that restrict- 60% ed damage within a hemisphere after a Men stroke more often affects the posterior re- gion of the left hemisphere. Because men rely more on this region for speech than 29% women do, they are more likely to be af- fected. We do not yet understand the ef- 12% fects on cognitive patterns of such diver- gent representation of speech and manu- al functions. Although my laboratory has not found evidence of sex differences in functional brain asymmetry with regard to basic speech, movement or spatial-rotation abil- Anterior Visual ities, we have found slight differences in Posterior cortex some verbal skills. Scores on a vocabulary test and on a verbal fluency test, for in- Left Hemisphere stance, were slightly affected by damage to either hemisphere in women, but such APHASIAS, or speech disorders, occur most often in women when damage is sustained in the scores were affected only by left hemi- anterior of the brain. In men, they occur more frequently when damage is in the posterior region. The data presented above derive from one set of patients. sphere damage in men. These findings sug- gest that when using some more abstract is always active to some degree. So for any ing and using weapons. Women gathered verbal skills, women do use their hemi- activity, such as reading aloud, the com- food near the home base, tended the spheres more equally than men do. But we parison activity—say, reading silently—is home, prepared food and clothing, and have not found this to be true for all word- intended to be very similar. We then “sub- cared for small children. Such specializa- related tasks; for example, verbal memo- tract” the brain pattern that occurs dur- tion would put different selection pres- ry appears to depend just as much on the ing silent reading to find the brain pattern sures on men and women. left hemisphere in women as in men. present while reading aloud. Yet such Any behavioral differences between In recent years, new techniques for methods require dubious assumptions individuals or groups must somehow be assessing the brain’s activity—including about what the subject is doing during ei- mediated by the brain. Sex differences functional magnetic resonance imaging ther activity. In addition, the more com- have been reported in brain structure and (fMRI) and positron emission tomogra- plex the activity, the more difficult it is to organization, and studies have been done phy (PET), when used during various know what is actually being measured af- on the role of sex hormones in influencing problem-solving activities—have shown ter subtracting the comparison activity. human behavior. But questions remain promise for providing more information regarding how hormones act on human about how brain function may vary Looking Back brain systems to produce the sex differ- among normal, healthy individuals. The TO UNDERSTAND human behavior— ences we described, such as in play be- research using these two techniques has how men and women differ from one an- havior or in cognitive patterns. so far yielded interesting, yet at times other, for instance—we must look beyond The information we have from labora- seemingly conflicting, results. the demands of modern life. Our brains tory animals helps to guide our explana- Some research has shown greater dif- are essentially like those of our ancestors tions, but ultimately these hypotheses must ferences in activity between the hemi- of 50,000 and more years ago, and we be tested on people. Refinements in brain- spheres of men than of women during can gain some insight into sex differences imaging techniques, when used in con- certain language tasks, such as judging if by studying the differing roles men and junction with our knowledge of hormonal two words rhyme and creating past tens- women have played in evolutionary his- influences and with continuing studies on es of verbs. Other research has failed to tory. Men were responsible for hunting the behavioral deficits after damage to find sex differences in functional asym- and scavenging, defending the group various brain regions, should provide in- metry. The different results may be at- against predators and enemies, and shap- sight into some of these questions. SA tributed in part to different language tasks being used in the various studies, perhaps MORE TO EXPLORE showing that the sexes may differ in brain Sex on the Brain: The Biological Differences between Men and Women. Deborah Blum. organization for some language tasks but Viking Press, 1997. not for others. The Trouble with Testosterone: And Other Essays on the Biology of the Human Predicament. The varying results may also reflect the Robert M. Sapolsky. Scribner, 1997.

JARED SCHNEIDMAN DESIGN complexity of these techniques. The brain Sex and Cognition. Doreen Kimura. MIT Press, 1999 (paperbound, 2000).

www.sciam.com THE HIDDEN MIND 37 COPYRIGHT 2002 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC.