DOCSLIB.ORG

Golden Ratio Group” and Those of “Square-Root-Of-2 Ratio Group”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Golden Ratio Group” and Those of “Square-Root-Of-2 Ratio Group” Original Paper ________________________________________________________________________________________ Forma, 36, 1–14, 2021 Close Relationship between Ratios of “Golden Ratio Group” and Those of “Square-Root-of-2 Ratio Group” Hiroaki Kimpara Kawasaki Branch, Mathematical Association of Japan, 255 Ohkubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan E-mail: [email protected] (Received February 3, 2020; Accepted September 22, 2020) While the golden ratio (1:φ) has been well known since the ancient Greece age and has already been studied in depth by many researchers, the square-root-of-2 ratio (1: 2 ) and other ratios of this group have gone largely unnoticed until now, despite the fact that the rhombic dodecahedron, one of the most important poly- hedra, is based on the square-root-of-2 ratio. According to a popular theory, these ratios are independent of one another. Against it, however, the author found out that there exists close relationship between the ratios of the golden ratio group and those of the square-root-of-2 ratio group through careful study on three kinds of rhombic polyhedron. Key words: Golden Ratio, Square-Root-of-2 Ratio, Rhombus, Rhombic Polyhedron, Dihedral 1. Introduction gon to a specific diagonal thereof. These ratios also rep- Until now, it has been the established fact that the golden resent the length ratios between two diagonals of spe- ratio is an independent ratio with no specific relationship cific rhombuses, and each of such rhombuses constitutes with other special ratios like the square-root-of-2 ratio. a specific group of rhombic polyhedron. These findings Against it, however, the author puts forth the following are explained in Sec. 3. The five kinds of regular polyhe- proposition based on careful research into three kinds of dron are classified into two groups; one is a square-root- rhombic polyhedron. of-2 ratio group and the other is a golden ratio group. Such classification is described in Sec. 4. Proposition. There exists a close relationship between Section 6 reveals that plane-filling is realized by com- the ratios of the golden ratio group and those of the bination of the golden rhombus and the “square-root-of- square-root-of-2 ratio group. (Note: An explanation for 2 square rhombus” and that another plane-filling becomes these two groups is given in Sec. 2.) possible with a combination of the “square-root-of-2 rhombus” and the new rhombus based on a new ratio. Good grounds for this proposition are shown in Sec. 5 The definition of these rhombuses is provided in Sec. 3. and Sec. 6. Section 5 deals with the agreement in the dihedral of 2. Relationship with the Diagonal of the Regular solids transformed from three kinds of rhombic polyhe- Polygon dron, which provides evidence for this proposition. They There exist several specific ratios of significance other are rhombic dodecahedron, rhombic triacontahedron, and than the golden ratio and the square-root-of-2 ratio. All rhombic enneacontahedron. A common property of these these ratios are shown in Table 1 below. Except the square- solids is that they can all be built up from the regular root-of-2 triplicate ratio, they are all equal to the length polyhedron. The rhombic triacontahedron and the rhombic ratio of one side of the regular polygon to a specific di- enneacontahedron are totally different from each other in agonal thereof. Yet, the golden ratio and the square-root- shape, face composition, etc. Nevertheless, transforma- of-2 ratio are considered exceptional in that they repre- tions of these solids based on a simple specific principle sent the sole such ratio inherent in the regular pentagon amazingly result in exactly the same shape. and the regular tetragon, respectively. This is because Section 2 indicates that there are several specific ratios there exists only one kind of diagonal in these polyhedra. of significance other than the golden ratio and the square- The ratio 1: 23 is derived from the dodecagon and, root-of-2 ratio and that they belong to either a golden ra- + tio group or a square-root-of-2 ratio group. Except the for this reason, it is tentatively named the “dodecagon “square-root-of-2 triplicate ratio”, these ratios are all ratio”. According to a common view, the ratio 1:1+ 2 equal to the length ratio of one side of the regular poly- represents the silver ratio. Note that the term “silver ra- tio” sometimes means the ratio 1: 2 . But, in this paper Copyright Society for Science on Form, Japan this definition is not used. Of these ratios, the golden ra- tio, square-root-of-2 ratio, and silver ratio are self-ex- doi:10.5047/forma.2021.001 1 2 H. Kimpara Table 1. Seven specific ratios of significance including the golden ratio and the square-root-of-2 ratio. The above calculation indicates that the dodecagon ra- tio is equal to the length ratio of one side of the regular dodecagon to its shortest diagonal. The last two ratios in Table 1 are derived by the use of Fig. 2 below, which is a regular octahedron. Shown in Fig. 2 below is a regular octahedron projected to a XY- plane with the Z-axis serving as 2-fold rotational sym- metry axis. With the tetragon AHBC being a square-root- of-2 rhombus, HO: AO = 1: 2 . Therefore, HO: AB = 1:2 2 . This means that the square-root-of-2 triplicate ratio is equal to the length ratio of one-half edge of the Fig. 1. (a) Regular decagon; (b) Regular dodecagon. regular octahedron to its space diagonal. 3. Relationship with the Diagonals of Rhombuses planatory. Therefore, explanations are given to the other Various ratios mentioned above also represent the length ratios in Table 1. ratios between two diagonals of the following special The second ratio in Table 1 is expressed by AB:AD rhombuses, as shown in Table 2. shown in Fig. 1(a), which shows a regular decagon. Its Out of these angles, the acute angle of the square-root- proof is given below. of-2 rhombus (≈70°31′43.606″), obtuse angle of the square-root-of-2 rhombus (≈109°28′16.394″), obtuse an- gle of the golden rhombus (≈116°33′54.184″), obtuse angle of the golden square rhombus (≈138°11′22.866″), and obtuse angle of the square-root-of-2 triplicate rhom- bus (≈141°03′27.212″) are respectively equal to the di- hedral angles (those of two neighboring faces) of the regu- lar tetrahedron, regular octahedron, regular dodecahedron, regular icosahedron, and triangular bipyramid. The tri- The foregoing calculation indicates that the golden square angular bipyramid is a type of hexahedron, being the first ratio is equal to the length ratio of one side of the regular in the infinite set of face-transitive bipyramids. It is the decagon to its 2nd shorter diagonal. dual of the triangular prism with 6 isosceles triangle faces. Shown in Fig. 1(b) is a regular dodecagon, which also Particularly, the obtuse angle of the square-root-of-2 includes a regular tetragon (i.e. square) and a regular hexa- gon. In fact, the right isosceles triangle ADG is equiva- lent to one-half of a regular tetragon and the trapezoid ACEG is equivalent to one-half of a regular hexagon. In this figure, the triangle ACO is a regular triangle. There- fore, AC = AO = AG /2 . AC : AG = 1:2. This means that the “square-root-of-2 square ratio” is equal to the length ratio of one side of the regular hexagon to its longer diagonal. Fig. 2. Regular octahedron projected to a XY-plane with the Z-axis serving as 2-fold rotational symmetry axis. Close Relationship between Ratios of “Golden Ratio Group” and Those of “Square-Root-of-2 Ratio Group” 3 Table 2. Length ratios between two diagonals of special rhombuses. Table 3. Special rhombuses constituting a specific rhombic polyhedron. Fig. 3. How to make the rhombic icosahedron and the rhombic dodecahedron of the 2nd kind from the rhombic triacontahedron. rhombus (≈109°28′16.394″) is called the regular tetrahe- Of these poyhedra, the rhombic dodecahedron of the dron angle (called Maraldi’s angle, also) in the field of 2nd kind and the rhombic icosahedron are created from crystallography. the rhombic triacontahedron. This process is illustrated Here, it is to be noted that twice the acute angle of the in [3]. For reference purpose, this illustration is excerpted golden rhombus (≈63°26′05.816″) is equal to the obtuse and shown in Fig. 3 below. This means that the rhombic angle of the “square-root-of-2 square rhombus” dodecahedron of the 2nd kind, rhombic icosahedron and (≈126°52′11.632″) and that twice the acute angle of the rhombic triacontahedron all fall under the same category. square-root-of-2 rhombus (≈70°31′43.606″) is equal to Figure 3 illustrates the process of making the rhombic the obtuse angle of the “square-root-of-2 triplicate rhom- icosahedron and the rhombic dodecahedron of the 2nd bus” (≈141°03′27.212″) and that twice the acute angle of kind from the rhombic triacontahedron, (a) → (b) → (c) the “dodecagon ratio rhombus” (≈54°44′08.197″) is equal → (d) → (e) → (f). The rhombic icosahedron is created to the obtuse angle of the square-root-of-2 rhombus by pulling out 10 rhombuses, i.e. shadowed portion of (≈109°28′08.197″). (b), from the triacontahedron and by combining the up- Furthermore, these rhombuses constitute a specific per portion with the lower portion. Further, the rhombic rhombic polyhedron as listed in Table 3 below.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From a GOLDEN RECTANGLE to GOLDEN QUADRILATERALS And
    An example of constructive defining: TechSpace From a GOLDEN TechSpace RECTANGLE to GOLDEN QUADRILATERALS and Beyond Part 1 MICHAEL DE VILLIERS here appears to be a persistent belief in mathematical textbooks and mathematics teaching that good practice (mostly; see footnote1) involves first Tproviding students with a concise definition of a concept before examples of the concept and its properties are further explored (mostly deductively, but sometimes experimentally as well). Typically, a definition is first provided as follows: Parallelogram: A parallelogram is a quadrilateral with half • turn symmetry. (Please see endnotes for some comments on this definition.) 1 n The number e = limn 1 + = 2.71828 ... • →∞ ( n) Function: A function f from a set A to a set B is a relation • from A to B that satisfies the following conditions: (1) for each element a in A, there is an element b in B such that <a, b> is in the relation; (2) if <a, b> and <a, c> are in the relation, then b = c. 1It is not being claimed here that all textbooks and teaching practices follow the approach outlined here as there are some school textbooks such as Serra (2008) that seriously attempt to actively involve students in defining and classifying triangles and quadrilaterals themselves. Also in most introductory calculus courses nowadays, for example, some graphical and numerical approaches are used before introducing a formal limit definition of differentiation as a tangent to the curve of a function or for determining its instantaneous rate of change at a particular point. Keywords: constructive defining; golden rectangle; golden rhombus; golden parallelogram 64 At Right Angles | Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Snub Cell Tetricosa
    E COLE NORMALE SUPERIEURE ________________________ A Zo o of ` embeddable Polytopal Graphs Michel DEZA VP GRISHUHKIN LIENS ________________________ Département de Mathématiques et Informatique CNRS URA 1327 A Zo o of ` embeddable Polytopal Graphs Michel DEZA VP GRISHUHKIN LIENS January Lab oratoire dInformatique de lEcole Normale Superieure rue dUlm PARIS Cedex Tel Adresse electronique dmiensfr CEMI Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow A zo o of l embeddable p olytopal graphs MDeza CNRS Ecole Normale Superieure Paris VPGrishukhin CEMI Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Abstract A simple graph G V E is called l graph if for some n 2 IN there 1 exists a vertexaddressing of each vertex v of G by a vertex av of the n cub e H preserving up to the scale the graph distance ie d v v n G d av av for all v 2 V We distinguish l graphs b etween skeletons H 1 n of a variety of well known classes of p olytop es semiregular regularfaced zonotop es Delaunay p olytop es of dimension and several generalizations of prisms and antiprisms Introduction Some notation and prop erties of p olytopal graphs and hypermetrics Vector representations of l metrics and hypermetrics 1 Regularfaced p olytop es Regular p olytop es Semiregular not regular p olytop es Regularfaced not semiregularp olytop es of dimension Prismatic graphs Moscow and Glob e graphs Stellated k gons Cup olas Antiwebs Capp ed antiprisms towers and fullerenes regularfaced not semiregular p olyhedra Zonotop es Delaunay p olytop es Small
    [Show full text]
  • Calculating Numerical Roots = = 1.37480222744
    #10 in Fundamentals of Applied Math Series Calculating Numerical Roots Richard J. Nelson Introduction – What is a root? Do you recognize this number(1)? 1.41421 35623 73095 04880 16887 24209 69807 85696 71875 37694 80731 76679 73799 07324 78462 10703 88503 87534 32764 15727 35013 84623 09122 97024 92483 60558 50737 21264 41214 97099 93583 14132 22665 92750 55927 55799 95050 11527 82060 57147 01095 59971 60597 02745 34596 86201 47285 17418 64088 91986 09552 32923 04843 08714 32145 08397 62603 62799 52514 07989 68725 33965 46331 80882 96406 20615 25835 Fig. 1 - HP35s √ key. 23950 54745 75028 77599 61729 83557 52203 37531 85701 13543 74603 40849 … If you have had any math classes you have probably run into this number and you should recognize it as the square root of two, . The square root of a number, n, is that value when multiplied by itself equals n. 2 x 2 = 4 and = 2. Calculating the square root of the number is the inverse operation of squaring that number = n. The "√" symbol is called the "radical" symbol or "check mark." MS Word has the radical symbol, √, but we often use it with a line across the top. This is called the "vinculum" circa 12th century. The expression " (2)" is read as "root n", "radical n", or "the square root of n". The vinculum extends over the number to make it inclusive e.g. Most HP calculators have the square root key as a primary key as shown in Fig. 1 because it is used so much. Roots and Powers Numbers may be raised to any power (y, multiplied by itself x times) and the inverse operation, taking the root, may be expressed as shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Combinatorics: the Fine Art of Counting
    Combinatorics: The Fine Art of Counting Week Three Solutions Note: in these notes multiplication is assumed to take precedence over division, so 4!/2!2! = 4!/(2!*2!), and binomial coefficients are written horizontally: (4 2) denotes “4 choose 2” or 4!/2!2! Appetizers 1. How many 5 letter words have at least one double letter, i.e. two consecutive letters that are the same? 265 – 26*254 = 1,725,126 2. A Venn diagram is drawn using three circular regions of radius 1 with their centers all distance 1 from each other. What is the area of the intersection of all three regions? What is the area of their union? Let A, B, and C be the three circular regions. A∪B∪C can be seen to be equal to the union of three 60° sectors of radius 1, call them X, Y, and Z. The intersection of any 2 or 3 of these is an equilateral triangle with side length 1. Applying PIE, , we have |XUYUZ| = |X| + |Y| + |Z| - (|X∪Y| + |Y∪Z| + |Z∪X|) + |X∪Y∪Z| which is equal to 3*3*π/6 – 3*√3/4 + √3/4 = π/2 - √3/2. The intersection of any two of A, B, or C has area 2π/3 - √3/2, as shown in class. Applying PIE, |AUBUC| = |A| + |B| + |C| - (|A∪B| + |B∪C| + |C∪A|) + |A∪B∪B| equal to 3π - 3*(2π/3 - √3/2) + (π/2 - √3/2) = 3π/2 + √3 3. A diagonal of polygon is any line segment between vertices which is not an edge of the polygon.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING MATHEMATICS to UNDERSTAND PLATO -THEAETEUS (147D-148B Salomon Ofman
    UNDERSTANDING MATHEMATICS TO UNDERSTAND PLATO -THEAETEUS (147d-148b Salomon Ofman To cite this version: Salomon Ofman. UNDERSTANDING MATHEMATICS TO UNDERSTAND PLATO -THEAETEUS (147d-148b. Lato Sensu, revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences, Société de philosophie des sciences, 2014, 1 (1). hal-01305361 HAL Id: hal-01305361 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01305361 Submitted on 20 Apr 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNDERSTANDING MATHEMATICS TO UNDERSTAND PLATO - THEAETEUS (147d-148b) COMPRENDRE LES MATHÉMATIQUES POUR COMPRENDRE PLATON - THÉÉTÈTE (147d-148b) Salomon OFMAN Institut mathématique de Jussieu-PRG Histoire des Sciences mathématiques 4 Place Jussieu 75005 Paris [email protected] Abstract. This paper is an updated translation of an article published in French in the Journal Lato Sensu (I, 2014, p. 70-80). We study here the so- called ‘Mathematical part’ of Plato’s Theaetetus. Its subject concerns the incommensurability of certain magnitudes, in modern terms the question of the rationality or irrationality of the square roots of integers. As the most ancient text on the subject, and on Greek mathematics and mathematicians as well, its historical importance is enormous.
    [Show full text]
  • Almost-Magic Stars a Magic Pentagram (5-Pointed Star), We Now Know, Must Have 5 Lines Summing to an Equal Value
    MAGIC SQUARE LEXICON: ILLUSTRATED 192 224 97 1 33 65 256 160 96 64 129 225 193 161 32 128 2 98 223 191 8 104 217 185 190 222 99 3 159 255 66 34 153 249 72 40 35 67 254 158 226 130 63 95 232 136 57 89 94 62 131 227 127 31 162 194 121 25 168 200 195 163 30 126 4 100 221 189 9 105 216 184 10 106 215 183 11 107 214 182 188 220 101 5 157 253 68 36 152 248 73 41 151 247 74 42 150 246 75 43 37 69 252 156 228 132 61 93 233 137 56 88 234 138 55 87 235 139 54 86 92 60 133 229 125 29 164 196 120 24 169 201 119 23 170 202 118 22 171 203 197 165 28 124 6 102 219 187 12 108 213 181 13 109 212 180 14 110 211 179 15 111 210 178 16 112 209 177 186 218 103 7 155 251 70 38 149 245 76 44 148 244 77 45 147 243 78 46 146 242 79 47 145 241 80 48 39 71 250 154 230 134 59 91 236 140 53 85 237 141 52 84 238 142 51 83 239 143 50 82 240 144 49 81 90 58 135 231 123 27 166 198 117 21 172 204 116 20 173 205 115 19 174 206 114 18 175 207 113 17 176 208 199 167 26 122 All rows, columns, and 14 main diagonals sum correctly in proportion to length M AGIC SQUAR E LEX ICON : Illustrated 1 1 4 8 512 4 18 11 20 12 1024 16 1 1 24 21 1 9 10 2 128 256 32 2048 7 3 13 23 19 1 1 4096 64 1 64 4096 16 17 25 5 2 14 28 81 1 1 1 14 6 15 8 22 2 32 52 69 2048 256 128 2 57 26 40 36 77 10 1 1 1 65 7 51 16 1024 22 39 62 512 8 473 18 32 6 47 70 44 58 21 48 71 4 59 45 19 74 67 16 3 33 53 1 27 41 55 8 29 49 79 66 15 10 15 37 63 23 27 78 11 34 9 2 61 24 38 14 23 25 12 35 76 8 26 20 50 64 9 22 12 3 13 43 60 31 75 17 7 21 72 5 46 11 16 5 4 42 56 25 24 17 80 13 30 20 18 1 54 68 6 19 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Proofs by Cases, Square Root of 2 Is Irrational, Operations on Sets
    COMP 1002 Intro to Logic for Computer Scientists Lecture 16 B 5 2 J Puzzle: Caesar cipher • The Roman dictator Julius Caesar encrypted his personal correspondence using the following code. – Number letters of the alphabet: A=0, B=1,… Z=25. – To encode a message, replace every letter by a letter three positions before that (wrapping). • A letter numbered x by a letter numbered x-3 mod 26. • For example, F would be replaced by C, and A by X • Suppose he sent the following message. – QOBXPROB FK QEB ZXSB • What does it say? Proof by cases • Use the tautology • If is ( ) ( ), 1 2 1 2 • prove 푝 ∨ 푝( ∧ 푝 → 푞 ∧). 푝 → 푞 → 푞 1 2 • Proof:∀푥 퐹 푥 ∀푥 퐺 푥 ∨ 퐺 푥 → 퐻 푥 1 2 – Universal퐺 푥 instantiation:→ 퐻 푥 ∧ 퐺“let푥 n be→ an퐻 arbitrary푥 element of the domain of ” – Case 1: ( ) – Case 2: 푆 ∀푥 ( ) 1 – Therefore,퐺 (푛 → 퐻 푛 ) ( ), 2 – Now use퐺 universal푛 → 퐻 generalization푛 to conclude that is true. 퐺1 푛 ∨ 퐺2 푛 → 퐻 푛 • This generalizes for any number of cases 2. ∀ 푥 퐹 푥 푘 ≥ (Done). □ Proof by cases. • Definition (of odd integers): – An integer n is odd iff , = 2 + 1. • Theorem: Sum of an integer with a consecutive integer is odd. ∃푘 ∈ ℤ 푛 ⋅ 푘 – ( + + 1 ). • Proof: – Suppose∀푥 ∈ ℤ 푂푂푂n is an푥 arbitrary푥 integer. – Case 1: n is even. • So n=2k for some k (by definition). • Its consecutive integer is n+1 = 2k+1. Their sum is (n+(n+1))= 2k + (2k+1) = 4k+1. (axioms).
    [Show full text]
  • THE ZEN of MAGIC SQUARES, CIRCLES, and STARS Also by Clifford A
    THE ZEN OF MAGIC SQUARES, CIRCLES, AND STARS Also by Clifford A. Pickover The Alien IQ Test Black Holes: A Traveler’s Guide Chaos and Fractals Chaos in Wonderland Computers and the Imagination Computers, Pattern, Chaos, and Beauty Cryptorunes Dreaming the Future Fractal Horizons: The Future Use of Fractals Frontiers of Scientific Visualization (with Stuart Tewksbury) Future Health: Computers and Medicine in the 21st Century The Girl Who Gave Birth t o Rabbits Keys t o Infinity The Loom of God Mazes for the Mind: Computers and the Unexpected The Paradox of God and the Science of Omniscience The Pattern Book: Fractals, Art, and Nature The Science of Aliens Spider Legs (with Piers Anthony) Spiral Symmetry (with Istvan Hargittai) The Stars of Heaven Strange Brains and Genius Surfing Through Hyperspace Time: A Traveler’s Guide Visions of the Future Visualizing Biological Information Wonders of Numbers THE ZEN OF MAGIC SQUARES, CIRCLES, AND STARS An Exhibition of Surprising Structures across Dimensions Clifford A. Pickover Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford Copyright © 2002 by Clifford A. Pickover Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 3 Market Place, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1SY All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pickover, Clifford A. The zen of magic squares, circles, and stars : an exhibition of surprising structures across dimensions / Clifford A. Pickover. p. cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-691-07041-5 (acid-free paper) 1. Magic squares. 2. Mathematical recreations. I. Title. QA165.P53 2002 511'.64—dc21 2001027848 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Baskerville BE and Gill Sans.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ?
    Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ? Branko Grünbaum Dedicated to Joe Malkevitch, an old friend and colleague, who was always partial to polyhedra Abstract. The simple question of the title has many different answers, depending on the kinds of faces we are willing to consider, on the types of polyhedra we admit, and on the symmetries we require. Known results and open problems about this topic are presented. The main classes of objects considered here are the following, listed in increasing generality: Faces: convex n-gons, starshaped n-gons, simple n-gons –– for n ≥ 3. Polyhedra (in Euclidean 3-dimensional space): convex polyhedra, starshaped polyhedra, acoptic polyhedra, polyhedra with selfintersections. Symmetry properties of polyhedra P: Isohedron –– all faces of P in one orbit under the group of symmetries of P; monohedron –– all faces of P are mutually congru- ent; ekahedron –– all faces have of P the same number of sides (eka –– Sanskrit for "one"). If the number of sides is k, we shall use (k)-isohedron, (k)-monohedron, and (k)- ekahedron, as appropriate. We shall first describe the results that either can be found in the literature, or ob- tained by slight modifications of these. Then we shall show how two systematic ap- proaches can be used to obtain results that are better –– although in some cases less visu- ally attractive than the old ones. There are many possible combinations of these classes of faces, polyhedra and symmetries, but considerable reductions in their number are possible; we start with one of these, which is well known even if it is hard to give specific references for precisely the assertion of Theorem 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Icosahedral Polyhedra from 6 Lattice and Danzer's ABCK Tiling
    Icosahedral Polyhedra from 퐷6 lattice and Danzer’s ABCK tiling Abeer Al-Siyabi, a Nazife Ozdes Koca, a* and Mehmet Kocab aDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36, Al-Khoud, 123 Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, bDepartment of Physics, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey, retired, *Correspondence e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT It is well known that the point group of the root lattice 퐷6 admits the icosahedral group as a maximal subgroup. The generators of the icosahedral group 퐻3 , its roots and weights are determined in terms of those of 퐷6 . Platonic and Archimedean solids possessing icosahedral symmetry have been obtained by projections of the sets of lattice vectors of 퐷6 determined by a pair of integers (푚1, 푚2 ) in most cases, either both even or both odd. Vertices of the Danzer’s ABCK tetrahedra are determined as the fundamental weights of 퐻3 and it is shown that the inflation of the tiles can be obtained as projections of the lattice vectors characterized by the pair of integers which are linear combinations of the integers (푚1, 푚2 ) with coefficients from Fibonacci sequence. Tiling procedure both for the ABCK tetrahedral and the < 퐴퐵퐶퐾 > octahedral tilings in 3D space with icosahedral symmetry 퐻3 and those related transformations in 6D space with 퐷6 symmetry are specified by determining the rotations and translations in 3D and the corresponding group elements in 퐷6 .The tetrahedron K constitutes the fundamental region of the icosahedral group and generates the rhombic triacontahedron upon the group action. Properties of “K-polyhedron”, “B-polyhedron” and “C-polyhedron” generated by the icosahedral group have been discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Decomposing Deltahedra
    Decomposing Deltahedra Eva Knoll EK Design ([email protected]) Abstract Deltahedra are polyhedra with all equilateral triangular faces of the same size. We consider a class of we will call ‘regular’ deltahedra which possess the icosahedral rotational symmetry group and have either six or five triangles meeting at each vertex. Some, but not all of this class can be generated using operations of subdivision, stellation and truncation on the platonic solids. We develop a method of generating and classifying all deltahedra in this class using the idea of a generating vector on a triangular grid that is made into the net of the deltahedron. We observed and proved a geometric property of the length of these generating vectors and the surface area of the corresponding deltahedra. A consequence of this is that all deltahedra in our class have an integer multiple of 20 faces, starting with the icosahedron which has the minimum of 20 faces. Introduction The Japanese art of paper folding traditionally uses square or sometimes rectangular paper. The geometric styles such as modular Origami [4] reflect that paradigm in that the folds are determined by the geometry of the paper (the diagonals and bisectors of existing angles and lines). Using circular paper creates a completely different design structure. The fact that chords of radial length subdivide the circumference exactly 6 times allows the use of a 60 degree grid system [5]. This makes circular Origami a great tool to experiment with deltahedra (Deltahedra are polyhedra bound by equilateral triangles exclusively [3], [8]). After the barn-raising of an endo-pentakis icosi-dodecahedron (an 80 faced regular deltahedron) [Knoll & Morgan, 1999], an investigation of related deltahedra ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits
    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits by Nicholas Matteo B.A. in Mathematics, Miami University M.A. in Mathematics, Miami University A dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the College of Science of Northeastern University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 14, 2015 Dissertation directed by Egon Schulte Professor of Mathematics Abstract of Dissertation The amount of symmetry possessed by a convex polytope, or a tiling by convex polytopes, is reflected by the number of orbits of its flags under the action of the Euclidean isometries preserving the polytope. The convex polytopes with only one flag orbit have been classified since the work of Schläfli in the 19th century. In this dissertation, convex polytopes with up to three flag orbits are classified. Two-orbit convex polytopes exist only in two or three dimensions, and the only ones whose combinatorial automorphism group is also two-orbit are the cuboctahedron, the icosidodecahedron, the rhombic dodecahedron, and the rhombic triacontahedron. Two-orbit face-to-face tilings by convex polytopes exist on E1, E2, and E3; the only ones which are also combinatorially two-orbit are the trihexagonal plane tiling, the rhombille plane tiling, the tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb, and the rhombic dodecahedral honeycomb. Moreover, any combinatorially two-orbit convex polytope or tiling is isomorphic to one on the above list. Three-orbit convex polytopes exist in two through eight dimensions. There are infinitely many in three dimensions, including prisms over regular polygons, truncated Platonic solids, and their dual bipyramids and Kleetopes. There are infinitely many in four dimensions, comprising the rectified regular 4-polytopes, the p; p-duoprisms, the bitruncated 4-simplex, the bitruncated 24-cell, and their duals.
    [Show full text]