New Jersey State Ubrary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Court Puts Payments in Escrow Representative of the Must Pay Her Rent by Novem- Count Until the Landlord, Ber 18
RAH&'AY FRE2 PUBLIC LIBRARY 1175 ST, GEORGES AVE, P.AHWAY, H,J, 07065 NVros FREE r " New Jersey's Oldest Weekly Newspaper-Established 1822 iViLvV JERSEY' RAHWAY, NEW JERSEY,; THURSDAY;NOVEMBER "2471988 Rent strike heats up by Pat DiMaggio Tenants involved9? i1n litiga.. - I Five tenants rcnrcwmi-representeHd . Frannv.,,,1k, Dickensonr»:-i, , __, *f"^ MM tion against their landlord by the association have youngster who lives in the showed their dedication to withheld their rent in protest complex, said that someone the cause by picketing their of living conditions they call from the office of Shami As- apartment building during "unhealthy." The group ap- sociates told his mother that the pouring rain on Sunday peared in court on Novem- the judge settled the litiga- morning. ber 16, where their rent mon- tion and that Ms. Dickcnson ies were put in an escrow ac- Court puts payments in escrow Representative of the must pay her rent by Novem- count until the landlord, ber 18. "That was an outright Shami Apartments tenants known as the Shami Associ- association marched in front lie," said Prizzi. "This hasn't ates of Edison, has com- it," said Prizzi. "We can't live a one- or two-bedroom of 400-402 Hamilton Street pleted necessary repairs. been settled yet." like this anymore." Texidor, president of the most of these people. Many apartment in the 52-unit tenants association. "We apartment was without these buildings, he said. "We carrying placards asking for A hearing date of Pecem- Residents of the Shami building. of us arc Hispanic and we water for several days, the needed repairs to the build- Complaints range from no Apartments pay between think we deserve better con- don't know the language and don't want to bring anyone ber 19 has been set and if re- "This is terrible and it is ditions than these. -
THEWESTFIELD LEADER Tae Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newspaper in Union County
o\ THEWESTFIELD LEADER TAe Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newspaper In Union County NINETY-SI WESTFIELD, NEW JERSEY. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1981 Publliht* f*U. N I Entry 24 Pages—25 Cents On the Li Political &^ u t IUS Week: Planners to Study Tor Sale" Sign Betty Lists Launches Drive for Reelection Central Ave. Needs Restrictions Approved Third Ward Councilman Ave. to Green PL, in- natives based on Betty List, Westfields committee, and the evaluation of the in- Restrictions on the a 60-day time limit for from Peter Way. designed to "protect the Ray Stone announced cluding environmental placement and time their display, a time period Mrs. Kasko argued that first councilwoman. today Citizens' Advisory Com- today that under a $5,000 conditions, traffic and formation gathered in Westfield Board of launched her re-election mittee on Youth Activities. phase one as well as the periods permitted for real which Town Attorney freedom to use signs is "an Realtors." He admitted community development pedestrian circulation and estate "for sale"yard Charles Brandt said, that, important right of campaign, pledging "io Among her ac- block grant, the municipal parking and land use evaluation of input from that he wants to sell his maintain our community's complishments in an era municipal officials. signs, as well as a J25 fee given normal conditions, is homeowners," adding that house but does not want to planning and consulting considerations. During realtors have "an fine residential character when security problems phase one, planners will •'It is our goal," says for each sign, become law an average time for pay the $25 fee for a sign. -
KARCHER V. DAGGETT
KARCHER v. DAGGETT Syllabus KARCHER, SPEAKER, NEW JERSEY ASSEMBLY, ET AL. v. DAGGETT ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY No. 81-2057. Argued March 2, 1983--Decided June 22, 1983 As a result of the 1980 census, the New Jersey Legislature reapportioned the State's congressional districts. The reapportionment plan contained 14 districts, with an average population per district of 526,059, each dis- trict, on the average, differing from the "ideal" figure by 0.1384%. The largest district (Fourth District) had a population of 527,472, and the smallest (Sixth District) had a population of 523,798, the difference be- tween them being 0.6984% of the average district. In a suit by a group of individuals challenging the plan's validity, the District Court held that the plan violated Art. I, § 2, of the Constitution because the population deviations among districts, although small, were not the result of a good- faith effort to achieve population equality. Held: 1. The "equal representation" standard of Art. I, § 2, requires that congressional districts be apportioned to achieve population equality as nearly as is practicable. Parties challenging apportionment legislation bear the burden of proving that population differences among districts could have been reduced or eliminated by a good-faith effort to draw districts of equal population. If the plaintiffs carry their burden, the State must then bear the burden of proving that each significant vari- ance between districts was necessary to achieve some legitimate goal. Cf. Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 894 U. S. 526; White v. -
The Mandate of Equipopulous Congressional Districting: Karcher V
Boston College Law Review Volume 26 Article 8 Issue 2 Number 2 3-1-1985 The aM ndate of Equipopulous Congressional Districting: Karcher v. Daggett Richard K. Stavinski Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard K. Stavinski, The Mandate of Equipopulous Congressional Districting: Karcher v. Daggett, 26 B.C.L. Rev. 563 (1985), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol26/iss2/8 This Casenotes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Mandate of Equipopulous Congressional Districting: Karcher v. Daggett' — Article I, section 2 of the United States Constitution requires that members of the House of Representatives be chosen "by the People of the several States."' The Supreme Court has interpreted this requirement to mean not only that Representatives must be elected by popular vote,3 but also that each person's vote must he given equal weight.' Accordingly, states must draw congressional voting districts containing equal numbers of people, and districting plans are subject to judicial review to insure that this constitutional require- ment is met.' In the recent case of Karcher v. Daggell 6 the Supreme Court reviewed and found unconstitutional New jersey's latest congressional redistricting plan . 7 In a five-to-four decision, the Court reaffirmed its holding in Kirkpatrick v. -
Manual of the Legislature of New Jersey
STATE OF NEW JERSEY ______ MANUAL OF THE Legislature of New Jersey Two Hundred and Eleventh Legislature (First Session) 2004 BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE ______ ©2004, Skinder-Strauss Associates Newark, N.J. 2 MANUAL OF THE LEGISLATURE OF NEW JERSEY Publishers F.L. Lundy, 1872-1876 E.F. McCarthy, 1878 Thomas F. Fitzgerald and Louis C. Gosson, 1879-1885 Thomas F. Fitzgerald, 1886-1920 John P. Dullard, 1921-1952 J. Joseph Gribbins, 1953-1974 Edward J. Mullin, 1975-1992 Skinder-Strauss Associates, 1993- _____ INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER: ISBN 1-57741-187-0 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 5-11203 F This work is copyrighted, and no part of it may be copied or reproduced without written permission of the publisher. Exception is made, however, for news writers and broadcasters, who are welcome to quote from it in news accounts, identifying the source as the NEW JERSEY LEGISLATIVE MANUAL. ©2004, Skinder-Strauss Associates. Printed in U.S.A. Orders for this book accepted by: NEW JERSEY LEGISLATIVE MANUAL POST OFFICE BOX 2150 TRENTON, N.J. 08607-2150 Tel. 609-396-2669, ext. 2; 973-642-1440, ext. 2 Andrea Kane/The Legislative Manual THE STATE HOUSE, TRENTON 4 PREFACE PREFACE WE are proud to present our 2004 edition of the Legislative Manual. Our writers and editors have labored many hours to bring you the most current and complete work of its kind in our state. We are also pleased to announce that the Legislative Manual is also available on CD-ROM, in a Windows compatible format. Our CD-ROM edition also offers many special features not available in our book version, making it an unusually valuable reference tool.