Ecological Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hoverfly Newsletter 29
HOVERFLY NUMBER 29 NEWSLETTER FEBRUARY 2000 ISSN 1358-5029 On the first page of Hoverfly Newsletter No. 17 (November 1993) I wrote of the dilemma recorders are faced with in situations where a very common species and a rarity are sufficiently similar that they cannot easily be distinguished without capture (and in some cases without killing the insect). Do we capture innumerable specimens of ubiquitous species, when by not doing so we might risk missing a rarity? A related problem occurs when advances in knowledge show that a taxon that has been regarded as a single species can be split into more than one, particularly if the original taxon was common. The discovery a few years ago that what we knew as Platycheirus peltatus and Platycheirus clypeatus in fact included other species is an example. No doubt all readers are familiar with the methods of identifying the three species of Syrphus hitherto recognised as British; although all three are common, Syrphus is not the most straightforward of genera to identify to species, but at least the female of S. ribesii with its almost totally yellow hind femora is readily distinguishable in the field. I am sure I am not alone in having sent in numerous S. ribesii records based on females examined alive in the field, but not caught. In Dipterists Digest Vol. 6 No.2 (1999) Martin Speight has drawn our attention to the likely occurrence of another species, Syrphus rectus, in Britain. He reports that the female of this species is not distinguishable from that of S. ribesii using the keys for the genus that are current in the UK, and that while the females can be separated on the basis of wing microtrichia, the males of S. -
Hoverflies Family: Syrphidae
Birmingham & Black Country SPECIES ATLAS SERIES Hoverflies Family: Syrphidae Andy Slater Produced by EcoRecord Introduction Hoverflies are members of the Syrphidae family in the very large insect order Diptera ('true flies'). There are around 283 species of hoverfly found in the British Isles, and 176 of these have been recorded in Birmingham and the Black Country. This atlas contains tetrad maps of all of the species recorded in our area based on records held on the EcoRecord database. The records cover the period up to the end of 2019. Myathropa florea Cover image: Chrysotoxum festivum All illustrations and photos by Andy Slater All maps contain Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database right 2020 Hoverflies Hoverflies are amongst the most colourful and charismatic insects that you might spot in your garden. They truly can be considered the gardener’s fiend as not only are they important pollinators but the larva of many species also help to control aphids! Great places to spot hoverflies are in flowery meadows on flowers such as knapweed, buttercup, hogweed or yarrow or in gardens on plants such as Canadian goldenrod, hebe or buddleia. Quite a few species are instantly recognisable while the appearance of some other species might make you doubt that it is even a hoverfly… Mimicry Many hoverfly species are excellent mimics of bees and wasps, imitating not only their colouring, but also often their shape and behaviour. Sometimes they do this to fool the bees and wasps so they can enter their nests to lay their eggs. Most species however are probably trying to fool potential predators into thinking that they are a hazardous species with a sting or foul taste, even though they are in fact harmless and perfectly edible. -
Estimation of Total Factor Productivity Growth In
Trophic guild of invertebrates utilizing weeds of wheat and sugarcane Pak. J. Agri. Sci., Vol. 49(2), 189-198; 2012 ISSN (Print) 0552-9034, ISSN (Online) 2076-0906 http://www.pakjas.com.pk STATUS OF TROPHIC GUILD OF INVERTEBRATES UTILIZING WEEDS OF WHEAT AND SUGARCANE FIELDS OF FAISALABAD Muhammad Nadeem Abbas1,*, Shahnaz Akhtar Rana1, Hammad Ahmad Khan1 and Khalil-ur-Rehman2 1Department of Zoology and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad *Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] Qualitative synergy level of prey/pest-predator invertebrate populations occurring on weeds of sugarcane and wheat crops was evaluated on the basis of their relative occurrence on the weeds. Seventeen weed species common in and around wheat field harboured 50 species of predators including insects and spiders in addition to 20 known pest species of different crops. These weeds also harboured 14 recycler species. The ratio of pest/prey-predator in the wheat fields was high. Whereas eight weeds common in sugarcane fields harboured 13 species of predator insects and spiders. These weeds were observed to bear 17 known pest species of some major crops in addition to 28 recycler species playing key role (scavenging, fragmenting and decomposing) in some sort of ambient environment of cane fields. Keywords: Biodiversity, predator, prey, pest, Non crop fauna INTRODUCTION crop. One of the earlier reported examples is that of the lesser corn stalk borer in California Zea mays (Reynolds et Weeds and arthropods interact more frequently in the al., 1959). The insect can utilize many grass weeds as agroecosystem. -
Diptera, Sy Ae)
Ce nt re fo r Eco logy & Hydrology N AT U RA L ENVIRO N M EN T RESEA RC H CO U N C IL Provisional atlas of British hover les (Diptera, Sy ae) _ Stuart G Ball & Roger K A Morris _ J O I N T NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE NERC Co pyright 2000 Printed in 2000 by CRL Digital Limited ISBN I 870393 54 6 The Centre for Eco logy an d Hydrolo gy (CEI-0 is one of the Centres an d Surveys of the Natu ral Environme nt Research Council (NERC). Established in 1994, CEH is a multi-disciplinary , environmental research organisation w ith som e 600 staff an d w ell-equipp ed labo ratories and field facilities at n ine sites throughout the United Kingdom . Up u ntil Ap ril 2000, CEM co m prise d of fou r comp o nent NERC Institutes - the Institute of Hydrology (IH), the Institute of Freshw ater Eco logy (WE), the Institute of Terrestrial Eco logy (ITE), and the Institute of Virology an d Environmental Micro b iology (IVEM). From the beginning of Ap dl 2000, CEH has operated as a single institute, and the ind ividual Institute nam es have ceased to be used . CEH's mission is to "advance th e science of ecology, env ironme ntal microbiology and hyd rology th rough h igh q uality and inte rnat ionall) recognised research lead ing to better understanding and quantifia ttion of the p hysical, chem ical and b iolo gical p rocesses relating to land an d freshwater an d living organisms within the se environments". -
Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of El Ventorrillo Biological Station, Madrid Province, Spain: a Perspective from a Late Twentieth Century Inventory
Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of El Ventorrillo Biological Station, Madrid province, Spain: a perspective from a late twentieth century inventory Authors: Lorenzo, Daniel, Ricarte, Antonio, Nedeljković, Zorica, Nieves-Aldrey, José Luis, and Marcos-García, Maria Ángeles Source: Revue suisse de Zoologie, 127(2) : 393-412 Published By: Muséum d'histoire naturelle, Genève URL: https://doi.org/10.35929/RSZ.0029 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Revue-suisse-de-Zoologie on 02 Nov 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Revue suisse de Zoologie (September 2020) 127(2): 393-412 ISSN 0035-418 Hoverfl ies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of El Ventorrillo Biological Station, Madrid province, Spain: a perspective from a late twentieth century inventory Daniel Lorenzo1, Antonio Ricarte1*, Zorica Nedeljković1, José Luis Nieves-Aldrey2 & Maria Ángeles Marcos-García1 1 Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad (CIBIO), Universidad de Alicante, Carretera de San Vicente, s/n, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain. -
Checkliste Der Schwebfliegen (Diptera: Syrphidae) Österreichs
CHECKLISTE DER SCHWEBFLIEGEN (DIPTERA: SYRPHIDAE) ÖSTERREICHS Masterarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Science an der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz eingereicht von Helge Heimburg, BSc. am Institut für Biologie Begutachter: Priv. Doz. Mag. Dr. Werner Holzinger Unter fachlicher Betreuung von Dieter Doczkal Graz, im Oktober 2018 1 Danksagung An dieser Stelle will ich mich bei jenen Kollegen und Freunden bedanken, die maßgeblich am Gelingen dieser Arbeit beteiligt waren. Allen voran bedanke ich mich bei meinem Betreuer Werner Holzinger, der mir stets mit Rat und Tat zur Seite gestanden ist. Bei Dieter Doczkal bedanke ich mich für die fachliche Betreuung und die lehrreichen Stunden, die mit der Determination von Schwebfliegen und spannenden Diskussionen gefüllt waren. Claus Claußen danke ich für die großzügige Weitergabe seiner persöhnlichen Daten über Schwebfliegen aus Österreich. Mit seinem Einverständis konnten die Daten in die vorliegende Arbeit miteinbezogen werden. Denise Ivenz, Heimo Metz und Thomas Romig unterstützen mich ebenfalls mit wertvollen faunistischen Daten aus dem Bundesgebiet. Für die reibungslose Kooperation mit dem Naturkundemuseum inatura Dornbirn (Vorarlberg), dem Haus der Natur (Salzburg) und dem Tiroler Landesmuseum bedanke ich mich bei den verantworlichen Personen Georg Friebe, Patrick Gros und Benjamin Wiesmaier. Renate und Hubert Rausch danke ich für die Schenkung einer Schwebfliegensammlung aus Niederösterreich, die zum Großteil von Franz Ressl zusammengetragen wurde. Bei meinen KollegInnen Sandra Aurenhammer, Elisabeth Bauchhenß, Johanna Gunczy, Wido Gunczy, Elisabeth Huber, Christian Komposch, Rachel Korn, Gernot Kunz, Andreas Link, Esther Ockermüller, Elisabeth Papenberg, Sandra Preiml, Gerhard Schlüsslmayr, Martin Schwarz, Johannes Neumayer, Katharina Spiß, Herbert Wagner, Wolfgang Waitzbauer und Herbert Zettel bedanke ich mich für das Sammeln von Tiermaterial. -
ZMSPN 135.Pdf
МАТИЦА СРПСКА ОДЕЉЕЊЕ ЗА ПРИРОДНЕ НАУКЕ ЗБОРНИК МАТИЦЕ СРПСКЕ ЗА ПРИРОДНЕ НАУКЕ MATICA SRPSKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL SCIENCES MATICA SRPSKA J. NAT. SCI. Покренут 1951 / First published in 1951. Until volume 10, the journal was published under the title Научни зборник Матице српске: Серија при родних наука (Scientific Proceedings of Matica Srpska: Natural Sciences Series) (1951–1955). Volume 11 was released under the title Зборник Матице српске: Серија природних наука (Matica Srpska Proceedings: Natural Sciences Series) (1956), volumes 12–65 under the title Зборник за природне науке (Proceedings for Natural Sciences) (1957–1983), and from volume 66 the journal was published under the title Зборник Матице српске за природне науке (Matica Srpska Proceedings for Natural Sciences) (1984– ). From volume 84 (1993) the journal was published in English under the title Matica Srpska Proceedings for Natural Sciences (1993–2012), and since volume 125 under the title Matica Srpska Journal for Natural Sciences (2013–) Главни уредници / EditorsinChief Miloš Jovanović (1951), Branislav Bukurov (1952—1969), Lazar Stojković (1970—1976), Slobodan Glumac (1977—1996), Rudolf Kastori (1996—2012), Ivana Maksimović (2013—) 135 Уредништво / Editorial Board Савет Уредништва / Consulting Editors Slobodan ĆURČIĆ Atanas ATANASSOV (Bulgaria) Slavka GAJIN Peter HOCKING (Australia) Vaskrsija JANJIĆ Aleh Ivanovich RODZKIN (Belarus) Vidojko JOVIĆ Kalliopi ROUBELAKIS ANGELAKIS (Greece) Darko KAPOR Günther SCHILLING (Germany) Rudolf KASTORI Stanko STOJILJKOVIĆ (USA) Ivana MAKSIMOVIĆ György VÁRALLYAY (Hungary) Vojislav MARIĆ Accursio VENEZIA (Italy) Tijana PRODANOVIĆ Marija ŠKRINJAR Articles are available in full-text at the web site of Matica Srpska and in the fol- lowing data bases: Serbian Citation Index, EBSCO Academic Search Complet, abstract level at Agris (FAO), CAB Abstracts, CABI Full-Text and Thomson Reuters Master Journal List. -
Forest Farm Nature Reserve
Walking in the footsteps of Mary Gillham A Dedicated Naturalist: The Dr Mary Gillham Archive Project is a Heritage Lottery Funded project to celebrate the life and works of ecologist Dr Mary Gillham. Dr Mary Gillham (MBE) spent a huge amount of time exploring South Wales and recording all of the species she found, sometimes for personal interest, sometimes whilst educating extramural students and sometimes to record what species and habitats were present to provide evidence for protecting an area. In this series of ‘Walks with Mary Gillham’ we provide you with details of surveys Mary (and her colleagues) undertook, the species she recorded, and encourage you to visit sites and record what you can see. We would love to get an up-to-date species list so we can compare the two – will you find as much as Mary? Has the species composition changed drastically? Can you add new species to the list? Walk five: Forest Farm (and Glamorganshire Canal Local Nature Reserve) Carpark: ST13828054. Entrances: ST132814, ST135807 and ST143803 The long history of Forest Farm, the Glamorganshire Canal and Long Wood is described in Mary’s ‘Natural History of Cardiff’ book. From being an important thoroughfare for industry (by rail and canal) and being bisected by the new M4, Cardiff City Council with the help of groups such as the Cardiff Naturalists’ Society, Glamorgan Naturalists’ Trust, and Friends of Forest Farm, have managed to retain some of the historical features such as the Melingruffydd sluice and water wheel while managing the nature and habitats in way which supports a great diversity of wildlife. -
Catálogo De Los Diptera De España, Portugal Y Andorra (Insecta) Coordinador: Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen Edita: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA)
MONOGRAFÍAS S.E.A. — vol. 8 Primera Edición: Zaragoza, 31 Diciembre, 2002. Título: Catálogo de los Diptera de España, Portugal y Andorra (Insecta) Coordinador: Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen Edita: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA). Avda. Radio Juventud, 37 50012 – Zaragoza (España) Director de publicaciones: A. Melic [email protected] http://entomologia.rediris.es/sea Maquetación y Diseño: A. Melic Portada: Díptero imaginario: Cabeza (Nematocera): Tipula maxima Poda; tórax y alas (Orthorrhapha): Rhagio scolopaceus (Linnaeus); abdomen (Cyclorrhapha): Cylindromyia brassicaria (Fabricius); patas anteriores (Nematocera): Bibio marci (Linnaeus); patas medias (Orthorrhapha): Asilus crabroniformis Linnaeus; patas posteriores (Cyclorrhapha): Micropeza corrigiolata (Linnaeus). Imprime: Gorfi, S.A. c/.Menéndez Pelayo, 4 50009 – Zaragoza (España) I.S.B.N.: 84 – 932807– 0 – 4 Depósito Legal: Z – 1789 – 94 © Los autores (por la obra) © SEA (por la edición). Queda prohibida la reproducción total o parcial del presente volumen, o de cualquiera de sus partes, por cualquier medio, sin el previo y expreso consentimiento por escrito de los autores y editora. Publicación gratuita para socios SEA (ejercicio 2002). Precio de venta al público: 18 euros (IVA incluido). Gastos de envío no incluidos. Solicitudes: SEA. Catálogo de los Diptera de España, Portugal y Andorra (Insecta) Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen (coordinador) MONOGRAFÍAS SEA, vol. 8 ZARAGOZA, 2002 a m INDICE DE MATERIAS / ÍNDICE DE CONTEÚDOS / INDEX OF MATTERS Introducción / Introdução -
D1c. Status of Pollinating Insects
D1c. Status of pollinating Insects UK Biodiversity Indicators 2020 This documents supports D1c. Status of pollinating Insects Technical background document: Gary D. Powney, Colin A. Harrower, Charlotte Outhwaite, Nick J.B. Isaac For further information on D1c. Status of pollinating insects visit https://jncc.gov.uk/ukbi-D1c For further information on the UK Biodiversity Indicators visit https://jncc.gov.uk/ukbi 1 D1c. Status of pollinating Insects D1c - Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services – status of pollinating insects – technical background document Gary D. Powney, Colin A. Harrower, Charlotte Outhwaite, Nick J. B. Isaac Introduction Pollination is a vital ecosystem service that benefits agricultural and horticultural production, and is essential for maintaining wild flower biodiversity. By improving the yield, quality and resilience of crops, insect pollination has been valued at £400 million per year to the UK economy (POST, 2010). Thirty five percent of the world’s agricultural output, by volume, consists of 87 crop types that benefit from pollination by animals (insects, birds and mammals), but because most of these crops are not entirely dependent on animal pollination, the amount of production directly attributable to animals is lower than this value (Klein et al., 2007). There is growing concern regarding the population status of insect pollinators, and in turn the pollination service they provide (Potts et al., 2010; Garratt et al., 2014). As with most other areas of biodiversity, the main threats to pollinators include habitat loss, environmental pollution, climate change and the spread of alien species (Klein et al., 2007; Potts et al., 2010; Vanbergen & The Insect Pollinators Initiative 2013). -
Diptera, Syrphidae) of the Republic of Georgia
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 916: 1–123 (2020) Syrphidae of Georgia 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.916.47824 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of hover flies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of the Republic of Georgia Ximo Mengual1, Sander Bot2, Tinatin Chkhartishvili3, André Reimann4, Jana Thormann1, Laura von der Mark1 1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz-Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenaueral- lee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany 2 Kerklaan 30E, 9751 NN Haren, the Netherlands 3 Insititute of Zoo- logy, Ilia State University, Chavchavadze Avenue 32, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia 4 Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, Königsbrücker Landstraße 159, D-01109, Dresden, Germany Corresponding author: Ximo Mengual ([email protected]) Academic editor: Kurt Jordaens | Received 30 October 2019 | Accepted 21 January 2020 | Published 2 March 2020 http://zoobank.org/ACFE751D-8496-42CB-BED2-D2C222ACEB25 Citation: Mengual X, Bot S, Chkhartishvili T, Reimann A, Thormann J, von der Mark L (2020) Checklist of hover flies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of the Republic of Georgia. ZooKeys 916: 1–123.https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.916.47824 Abstract A checklist of the Syrphidae species of the Republic of Georgia is presented. New hover fly (Diptera: Syrphidae) records from Georgia are provided as a result of field work conducted in 2018. At the same time, published syrphid records for the country are here reviewed and updated. A total of 357 species of hoverflies are now documented from Georgia, 40 of which are reported for the first time. Moreover, DNA barcodes were sequenced for 238 specimens, representing 74 species from this country. -
Hoverflies Family Syrphidae
Species Status No. 9 A review of the scarce and threatened flies of Great Britain Part 6: Hoverflies family Syrphidae by Stuart G. Ball and Roger K.A. Morris Further information on the JNCC Species Status project can be obtained from the Joint Nature Conservation Committee website at http://www.jncc.gov.uk/species Copyright JNCC 2014 ISSN 1473-0154 This publication should be cited as: Ball, S.G. & Morris, R.K.A. 2014. A review of the scarce and threatened flies of Great Britain. Part 6: Syrphidae. Species Status 9: 1-130 Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. Contents 1. Introduction to the series ........................................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction to the review of hoverflies.................................................................................................... 5 3. Methods and sources of information ........................................................................................................ 9 4. Criteria for including species in the review ............................................................................................ 11 5. Species not included ................................................................................................................................. 14 6. The future .................................................................................................................................................. 18 7. Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................