DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural History of Vertebrates Characters Used in Fish Identification 1-9-03 (Modified 20050118)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural History of Vertebrates Characters Used in Fish Identification 1-9-03 (Modified 20050118) Natural History of Vertebrates Characters Used in Fish Identification 1-9-03 (modified 20050118) This lab is designed to familiarize the student with characters used in the identification of fishes. Only the most frequently encountered characters are mentioned here. Many other characters will be learned as the student finds a need for them when working with special groups. Do not allow specimens to dry out, especially the fins. Part I. Measurements. ( “Fishes of Arkansas,” by HW Robison and TM Buchanan– 1984-- will be helpful.)(Figure 73B) Standard length = distance from snout tip to structural base of caudal fin. Total length = distance fro anterior most projection of head to end on longest caudal ray. (Lobes of caudal fin should be squeezed together.) Body length = greatest depth of body not including fins or structures at fin bases. Head length = from the snout tip to the end of the opercular membrane. Snout length = from the mid-anterior snout tip to the boy anterior orbital rim. Questions: 1. Why do you think standard length is more frequently used in ichthyological work than total length? ______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________. 2. Measure and record the standard length and total length of the largest shiner. _______________ ____________________. 3. Measure and record the body depth, head length and snout length of the largest largemouth bass (Centrarchidae). ________________________ ___________________________ _______________________ Part II. Scalation (Figure 2.3). Three scale types are represented by the fishes we will examine: ganoid (Figure 2.3A), cycloid (Figure 2.3B), and ctenoid (Figure 2.3B). Ganoid scales are covered with an enamel-like substance and seldom overlap; cycloid scales are roughly circular, lack spines, but bear circuli and radii. Ctenoid scales are often quadrangular, bear circuli and radii and possess a posterior field with small spines. Examine a ganoid scale from a gar (Lepisosteidae), a cycloid scale from a shad (Clupeidae) and a ctenoid scale from a member of the family Centrarchidae. What type of scales are possessed by sturgeons (Acipenseridae) ______________by suckers (Catostomidae) ________________, by cyprinids_________________. Some fish lack scales, i.e., catfishes (Ictaluridae). Name two other families in which the member lack scales. _______________ ; __________________. Various scale counts are often important in differentiating between species. Lateral line scales (Figure 73 B)= the number of scales along the lateral line beginning with the first scale in contact with the shoulder girdle and ending with the scale over the structural base of the caudal fin. Scales above lateral line = the number of scales in a diagonal line downward and backward from the origin of the dorsal fin to, but not including the lateral line scale. Scales below lateral line = similar to above, but from the origin of the anal fin upwards and forwards. Scales around caudal peduncle = the number of scales around the most slender portion of the tail, counted in zigzag fashion. Questions: 1. What makes it difficult to count lateral lines scales on a creek chubsucker (Erimyzon oblongus) _______________________________________________________________________? 2. Make the above scale counts on a pirate perch (Aphredoderidae) and record your answers. Lateral line scales________________ Scales below lateral line_____________ Scales above lateral line ____________ Scales around caudal peduncle ___________ Part III. Fins (Figure 73 A and B): Typical teleost fishes have three unpaired fins and two pairs of paired fins. The unpaired fins are the dorsal fin, the caudal fin, and the anal fin. The paired fins are the pectoral fins and the pelvic fins. The dorsal, anal, and paired fins may possess spines, soft rays or both. Spines are unbranched and may be stiff or soft and pliable. At times, the portion of the dorsal fin containing spines is widely separated from the portion containing rays, and it appears like there are two distinct dorsal fins. Another fin-like structure which occasionally occurs in fishes is the adipose fin (Figure 73 A). This fin is not supported by spines or rays but is merely a fleshy integumentary outgrowth. It is found, when present, mid-dorsally, behind the dorsal fin. Questions: 1. Compare the positions of the paired fins on a centrarchid with those on a minnow (Cyprinidae). How do they differ? _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 2. Count and record the number of spines on the dorsal, anal, and pectoral fins of a black crappie (Centrarchidae). Dorsal__________ Anal__________Pectoral__________ 3. Count and record the number of soft rays in the dorsal and anal fin of the brook silversides (Atherinidae). Dorsal__________Anal__________Pectoral__________ 4. Of the following species, which possess an adipose fin: rainbow trout, chain pickerel, longear sunfish, and channel catfish? The caudal fin, which together with the posterior post anal portion of the body composes and tail of the fish, never possess spines but is entirely supported with soft rays. The caudal fin may be deeply forked, slightly forked (emarginate), rounded, squared off (truncate) or exhibit other types of margins. Most of the fishes you will study possess a homocercal tail (Figure 74 A) in which the vertebrae end at the base of the caudal fin, the lobes of which are about equal. Some, such as the sturgeons and paddlefish, have a heterocercal tail (Figure 74 C) in which the vertebrae bend upward to enter the upper caudal lobe, which is larger than the lower. The gars and bowfin have an abbreviated heterocercal tail in which the vertebrae bend up, but the tail is nearly symmetrical externally. Questions: 1. Compare the channel catfish with the yellow bullhead. Which has an emarginate caudal fin? _______________________ 2. Examine fishes which show the three basic tail types. Part IV. Coloration. Many species of fish possess very distinctive patterns and coloration. Unfortunately much of the color is lost in preservative, although the basic pattern often remains. Questions: 1. Compare the bluegill and the longear sunfish in coloration. Is there a difference in coloration? ________________________________________________________________________________ 2. Compare the pigmentation of two species of trout (Salmonidae). Is there a difference? ______________________________________________________________ 3. What conspicuous pigmentary characteristic is shared by the two shad, the bluegill, and the green sunfish? _____________________________________. 4. In most fishes, the venter is pigmented less heavily than the dorsum. This is counter shading and occurs in many animals. What is its function? _________________________________________________________ Examine the hog sucker. What is unusual about its counter shading? ______________ _____________________________________________________________________ Part V. Sexual Dimorphism: Most of the conspicuous differences between male and female fishes are pigmentary and are most conspicuous during the breeding season. These differences are lost in preservative. In live-bearing fishes males often have a copulatory organ by which they may be distinguished from females. Examine the copulatory structure (gonopodium) of the male mosquitofish. It is formed from the first few rays of the anal fin. Note its absence in the female. Questions: 1. Separate the male mosquito fishes from the females. What other sexual difference can be seen, aside from the gonopodium? __________________________________________ Part VI. Special Characters 1. Barbels (Figure 73A). Barbels are fleshy filaments or projections usually present on some part of the head. The “whiskers” of catfish are barbels. They function as tactile structures and are found on fishes of many families and genera. Questions: 3 1. Examine the chin barbels of various catfish species. Can you differentiate between the black and yellow bullhead (Ictaluridae) on the basis of chin barbels? How? ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 3. Considering the function of barbels, can you make a general statement about the feeding habits of fishes that possess them? _________________________________________. Does a carp possess barbels? _______________ _______________________________________________________ 2. Branchiostegal Rays (Figures 73D and 77C). These are bony flattened structures that support the membranes on the lower side of the head, just below the gill covers. Their number is often of taxonomic importance. Questions: 1. Count and record the number branchiostegal rays in the species of Esox (Esocidea). E. niger _____________________ E. americanus __________________. 3. Pseudobranchiae. Pseudobranchiae are gill-like structures on the inner surface of the gill cover (operculum), near the top. Mullets (Mugilidae) possess these structures. 4. Gill Rakers (Figure 76 A-D). These are slender rod-like to blunt knoblike projections along the anterior edges of the bony arches that support the gills. Their number and shape is often of use in differentiating similar species. Only those of the first (outermost) gill arch are counted. Questions: 1. Compare the gill raker counts of the shadow bass (Ambloplites) and the black crappie (Pomoxis) and record the differences.________________________.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification
    History of fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification AGNATHANS = Jawless • Class – Pteraspidomorphi • Class – Myxini?? (living) • Class – Cephalaspidomorphi – Osteostraci – Anaspidiformes – Petromyzontiformes (living) Major Groups of Agnathans • 1. Osteostracida 2. Anaspida 3. Pteraspidomorphida • Hagfish and Lamprey = traditionally together in cyclostomata Jaws = GNATHOSTOMES • Gnathostomes: the jawed fishes -good evidence for gnathostome monophyly. • 4 major groups of jawed vertebrates: Extinct Acanthodii and Placodermi (know) Living Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes • Living Chondrichthyans - usually divided into Selachii or Elasmobranchi (sharks and rays) and Holocephali (chimeroids). • • Living Osteichthyans commonly regarded as forming two major groups ‑ – Actinopterygii – Ray finned fish – Sarcopterygii (coelacanths, lungfish, Tetrapods). • SARCOPTERYGII = Coelacanths + (Dipnoi = Lung-fish) + Rhipidistian (Osteolepimorphi) = Tetrapod Ancestors (Eusthenopteron) Close to tetrapods Lungfish - Dipnoi • Three genera, Africa+Australian+South American ACTINOPTERYGII Bichirs – Cladistia = POLYPTERIFORMES Notable exception = Cladistia – Polypterus (bichirs) - Represented by 10 FW species - tropical Africa and one species - Erpetoichthys calabaricus – reedfish. Highly aberrant Cladistia - numerous uniquely derived features – long, independent evolution: – Strange dorsal finlets, Series spiracular ossicles, Peculiar urohyal bone and parasphenoid • But retain # primitive Actinopterygian features = heavy ganoid scales (external
    [Show full text]
  • MULLIDAE Goatfishes by J.E
    click for previous page 1654 Bony Fishes MULLIDAE Goatfishes by J.E. Randall, B.P.Bishop Museum, Hawaii, USA iagnostic characters: Small to medium-sized fishes (to 40 cm) with a moderately elongate, slightly com- Dpressed body; ventral side of head and body nearly flat. Eye near dorsal profile of head. Mouth relatively small, ventral on head, and protrusible, the upper jaw slightly protruding; teeth conical, small to very small. Chin with a pair of long sensory barbels that can be folded into a median groove on throat. Two well separated dorsal fins, the first with 7 or 8 spines, the second with 1 spine and 8 soft rays. Anal fin with 1 spine and 7 soft rays.Caudal fin forked.Paired fins of moderate size, the pectorals with 13 to 17 rays;pelvic fins with 1 spine and 5 soft rays, their origin below the pectorals. Scales large and slightly ctenoid (rough to touch); a single continuous lateral line. Colour: variable; whitish to red, with spots or stripes. 1st dorsal fin with 7or8spines 2nd dorsal fin with 1 spine and 8 soft rays pair of long sensory barbels Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Goatfishes are bottom-dwelling fishes usually found on sand or mud sub- strata, but 2 of the 4 western Atlantic species occur on coral reefs where sand is prevalent. The barbels are supplied with chemosensory organs and are used to detect prey by skimming over the substratum or by thrust- ing them into the sediment. Food consists of a wide variety of invertebrates, mostly those that live beneath the surface of the sand or mud.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Fossils As Paleo-Indicators of Ichthyofauna Composition and Climatic Change in Lake Malawi, Africa
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 303 (2011) 126–132 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Fish fossils as paleo-indicators of ichthyofauna composition and climatic change in Lake Malawi, Africa Peter N. Reinthal a,⁎, Andrew S. Cohen b, David L. Dettman b a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA b Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA article info abstract Article history: Numerous biological and chemical paleorecords have been used to infer paleoclimate, lake level fluctuation Received 27 February 2009 and faunal composition from the drill cores obtained from Lake Malawi, Africa. However, fish fossils have Received in revised form 23 October 2009 never been used to examine changes in African Great Lake vertebrate aquatic communities nor as indicators Accepted 1 January 2010 of changing paleolimnological conditions. Here we present results of analyses of a Lake Malawi core dating Available online 7 January 2010 back ∼144 ka that describe and quantify the composition and abundance of fish fossils and report on stable carbon isotopic data (δ13C) from fish scale, bone and tooth fossils. We compared the fossil δ13C values to δ13C Keywords: fi Lake Malawi values from extant sh communities to determine whether carbon isotope ratios can be used as indicators of Cichlid inshore versus offshore pelagic fish assemblages. Fossil buccal teeth, pharyngeal teeth and mills, vertebra and Fish fossils scales from the fish families Cichlidae and Cyprinidae occur in variable abundance throughout the core. Carbon isotopes Carbon isotopic ratios from numerous fish fossils throughout the core range between −7.2 and −27.5‰, Cyprinid similar to those found in contemporary Lake Malawi benthic and pelagic fish faunas.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Identification Guide Depicts More Than 50 Species of Fish Commonly Encoun- Make the Proper Identification of Every Fish Caught
    he identification of different spe- Most species of fish are distinctive in appear- ance and relatively easy to identify. However, cies of fish has become an im- closely related species, such as members of the portant concern for recreational same “family” of fish, can present problems. For these species it is important to look for certain fishermen. The proliferation of T distinctive characteristics to make a positive regulations relating to minimum identification. sizes and possession limits compels fishermen to The ensuing fish identification guide depicts more than 50 species of fish commonly encoun- make the proper identification of every fish caught. tered in Virginia waters. In addition to color illustrations of each species, the description of each species lists the distinctive characteristics which enable a positive identification. Total Length FIRST DORSAL FIN Fork Length SECOND NUCHAL DORSAL FIN BAND SQUARE TAIL NARES FORKED TAIL GILL COVER (Operculum) CAUDAL LATRAL PEDUNCLE CHIN BARBELS LINE PECTORAL CAUDAL FIN ANAL FINS FIN PELVIC FINS GILL RAKERS GILL ARCH UNDERSIDE OF GILL COVER GILL RAKER GILL FILAMENTS GILL FILAMENTS DEFINITIONS Anal Fin – The fin on the bottom of fish located between GILL ARCHES 1st the anal vent (hole) and the tail. 2nd 3rd Barbels – Slender strands extending from the chins of 4th some fish (often appearing similar to whiskers) which per- form a sensory function. Caudal Fin – The tail fin of fish. Nuchal Band – A dark band extending from behind or Caudal Peduncle – The narrow portion of a fish’s body near the eye of a fish across the back of the neck toward immediately in front of the tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) Based on Phenotypic Data
    Murilo Nogueira de Lima Pastana Phylogeny of Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) based on phenotypic data Relações filogenéticas de Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) com base em dados fenotípicos São Paulo 2019 Murilo Nogueira de Lima Pastana Phylogeny of Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) based on phenotypic data Relações filogenéticas de Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) com base em dados fenotípicos Versão Original Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação do Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências (Sistemática, Taxonomia Animal e Biodiversidade). Orientador: Prof. Dr. Aléssio Datovo São Paulo 2019 Não autorizo a reprodução e divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. Serviço de Biblioteca e Documentação Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo Catalogação na Publicação Pastana, Murilo Nogueira de Lima Phylogeny of Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) based on phenotypic data = Relações filogenéticas de Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) com base em dados fenotípicos/ Murilo Nogueira de Lima Pastana; orientador Aléssio Datovo. São Paulo 2019. 309p. Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemática, Taxonomia e Biodiversidade, Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, 2019. Versão original 1. Teleostei- filogenia. 2. Morfologia – Stromateiformes. I. Datovo, Alessio, orient. II. Título. CDU 597.5 PASTANA, Murilo Nogueira de Lima Phylogeny of Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) based on phenotypic data Relações filogenéticas de Stromateiformes (Teleostei; Percomorphacea) com base em dados fenotípicos Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação do Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências (Sistemática, Taxonomia Animal e Biodiversidade).
    [Show full text]
  • TPWD Fish Identification
    Fish Identification References • Hubbs, C., R.J. Edwards, and G.P. Garrett. 2008. An annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Texas, with keys to identification of species. Texas Academy of Science. Available from: http://www.texasacademyofscience.org/ • Page, L.M. and B.M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes, second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Trade and Reference Publishers. • Pflieger, W.L. 1997. The Fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation. • Thomas, C., T.H. Bonner, and B.G. Whiteside. 2007. Freshwater Fishes of Texas. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas. • Robison, H.W. and T.M. Buchanan. 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. The University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Gars • Ganoid scales • Beaklike snout Alligator Gar: Teeth on upper jaw in two rows Gars Spotted Gar: One row of teeth on upper jaw, Snout short Longnose Gar: One row of teeth on upper jaw, Snout long and narrow Herrings • Lateral line absent • Keel along belly Gizzard Shad: Subterminal mouth, blunt snout, large spot Threadfin Shad: Terminal mouth, pointed snout, small spot Minnows Campostoma • Cartilaginous ridge on lower jaw • Intestine long, wound around air bladder Chad Thomas Cyprinella • Typically deep-bodied minnows • Dorsal fin with pigment between rays Red Shiner: Dark shoulder patch, chin bar Blacktail Shiner: Distinct caudal spot Cyprinella Notemigonus Golden Shiner: Lateral line greatly decurved Macrhybopsis Chad Thomas Chubs: Maxillary barbels present, most with speckling Differentiate by location
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Morphology of the Pharyngeal Jaw Apparatus in Moray Eels
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 269:604–619 (2008) Functional Morphology of the Pharyngeal Jaw Apparatus in Moray Eels Rita S. Mehta* and Peter C. Wainwright Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 ABSTRACT Moray eels (Muraenidae) are a relatively eels comprise roughly 95% of the taxonomic diver- large group of anguilliform fishes that are notable for sity and species richness within the Elopomorpha. their crevice-dwelling lifestyle and renowned for their Muraenids, otherwise known as moray eels, are a ability to consume large prey. Morays apprehend their clade within the anguilliforms. They include prey by biting and then transport prey by extreme pro- roughly 200 species and represent one of the larg- traction and retraction of their pharyngeal jaw appara- tus. Here, we present a detailed interpretation of the est clades within the anguilliforms. Within the mechanisms of pharyngeal jaw transport based on work muraenids, two monophyletic subgroups are recog- with Muraena retifera. We also review what is known of nized: Uropterygiinae and Muraeninae. These sub- the moray pharyngeal jaw apparatus from the literature groups are based on morphological characters of and provide comparative data on the pharyngeal jaw ele- the gill arch region and the development of the ments and kinematics for other moray species to deter- median fin (Bo¨hlke et al., 1989). Uropterygiines mine whether interspecific differences in morphology contain the genera Anarchias, Channomuraena, and behavior are present. Rather than comprising broad Scuticaria, and Urotperygius, while roughly twelve upper and lower processing tooth plates, the pharyngeal genera are thought to comprise the muraenines jaws of muraenine and uropterygiine morays, are long (see McCosker and Randall, 2007 for new genus, and thin and possess large, recurved teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Histological Data on the Structure of the Lingual Toothplate of Arapaima Gigas (Osteoglossidae; Teleostei)
    Morphological and histological data on the structure of the lingual toothplate of Arapaima gigas (Osteoglossidae; Teleostei) by François J. MEUNIER* (1), Paolo M. BRITO (2) & Maria-Eduarda C. LEAL (2) Abstract. – The pirarucu, Arapaima gigas (Osteoglossidae) has a basibranchial toothplate that supports a great density of teeth and helps the food transfer from the oral cavity towards the oesophagus. The lingual teeth appear early during ontogeny of the hyoid and branchial skeleton. On the basibranchial toothplate the teeth are closely set but without any connection, contrary to the “coalesced teeth”. The lingual teeth are 4 mm long and 1.0 to 1.5 mm wide; they are constituted of a cone of orthodentine with a distal cap of enameloid. Dentine is divided into two layers: an inner layer of circumpulpal dentine and an external one of pallial dentine. A peculiar specifi- city of the lingual teeth is the presence of plicidentine in their basal part. So in Actinopterygii, plicidentine is not limited to lepisosteids only. Owing to (i) the different aspect of plicidentine in the two taxa and (ii) their relative phylogenetic distance, we can interprete plicidentine in Actinopterygii as a morphofunctional adaptation to a predation diet. © SFI Received: 6 May 2013 Accepted: 21 Nov. 2013 Résumé. – Quelques données morphologiques et histologiques sur la structure de la plaque dentaire linguale Editor: J.Y. Sire d’Arapaima gigas (Osteoglossidae; Teleostei). Le pirarucu, Arapaima gigas (Osteoglossidae) possède une plaque dentaire linguale très développée avec une grande densité de dents. Cette plaque facilite le transit des proies de la cavité buccale vers l’œsophage.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Feeding in the Mudskipper Periophthalmus (Pisces: Teleostei): a Cineradiographic Analysis
    Reprinted fromJ. Zool., Lond. (1981) 193, 517-530 Terrestrial feeding in the Mudskipper Periophthalmus (pisces: Teleostei): A cineradiographic analysis . DEBRA L. SPONDER AND GEORGE V. LAUDER * The Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. (Accepted 13 May 1980) (With 2 plates and 4 figures in the text) Mudskipping gobies (periophthalmihae) are among the most terrestrial of amphibious fishes. Specializations· associated with terrestrial prey capture and deglutition have been studied in Periophthalmus koelreuteri by light and X-ray cinematography which permits direct visualization ofpharyngeal jaw movement during deglutition. Anatomicalspecializaw tions of the pharyngeal jaws are described and include depressible teeth, a large ventral process on ceratobranchial five-, and muscular modifications. ~ Multiple terrestrial feedings oCCur by Periophthalmus without a return to the water, and cineradiography reveals that the buccal cavity is often filled .with air during terrestrial excursions in contrast to some previous hypotheses. Transport of the prey into the oesopha­ gus occurs primarily by anteroposterior movement of the upper pharyngeal jaw. The lower pharyngeal jaw plays a limited role in food transport and may serve primarily to hold and position prey. The bite between upper and lower pharyngeal"jaws occurs between the anterior teeth, and both jaws are protracted together during raking of food into· the oesophagus. Functional specializations correlated with terrestrial feeding include obligatory use~fpharyngealjawsfor swallowing even small preyitems and positioningofthe preyin the pharynx by pharyngeal jaw and hyoid movements alone. This analysis ofterrestrial feeding allows hypotheses ofdesign constraints imposed bythe aquatic medium on fishes to be raised and tested. Contents Page Introduction .. 517 Materials and methods 518 Results.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum: Chordata
    Phylum: Chordata All animals in the phylum Chordata possess four anatomical features at some point in their lifecycle. Those features include: • Notochord • Muscle attachment • Hollow dorsal nerve cord • Nerve signal transmission • Pharyngeal slits • Various functions • Post-anal tail • Movement Three Chordata subphyla: • Urochordata • Cephalochordata • Vertebrata 1 Subphylum: Urochordata The tunicates or sea squirts contain only the pharyngeal slits as an adult. They are usually sessile and use the pharynx for filter feeding. They are considered to be the closest relative to vertebrates. 2 Subphylum: Cephalochordata The lancelets contain all four chordate characteristics as an adult. They are usually found buried in the sand off our coast. 3 Subphylum: Vertebrata The vertebrates are animals with backbones and internal skeletons of made of cartilage or bone. They contain all four chordate characteristics as an adult with some modifications. They are free-living animals that diverged from other chordates approximately 500 mya (Cambrian). 4 What is a Fish? “Fish” are aquatic chordates with appendages developed as fins (when present), whose chief respiratory organ are gills and whose body is usually covered in scales. More than 27,900 fish species have been described, which is more than the number of birds, reptiles and mammals combined. There are the four major living groups of fish: Jawless fish Cartilaginous Fish Lobe-finned Fish Ray-finned Fish 5 Fish Scales Anterior Placoid Although most fishes have scales, the major groups of fish very in the types of scales the possess. Jawless fish lack scales, Ganoid cartilaginous fish have placoid scales, lobe-finned fish have ganoid scales and ray-finned fish have ctenoid and cycloid Ctenoid scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighead Carp (Hypopthalmichthys Nobilis) Katelin P. Cross Figure 1.1 Abstract: the Bighead Carp, Hypopthalmichthys Nobilis, Is A
    Katelin Cross Bighead Carp ( Hypopthalmichthys nobilis) Katelin P. Cross Figure 1.1 Image of non-native Bighead Carp ( Hypopthalmichthys nobilis ) taken from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife website, http://www.fws.gov/. Abstract: The Bighead Carp, Hypopthalmichthys nobilis , is a large cyprinid fish native to China. It has been introduced to areas of Europe and North America as a food fish for human consumption and to control eutrophication processes. It filters the water with its gill rakers removing large algae and zooplankton from the water column. Consumption of zooplankton causes a negative effect on native species that compete for the same resource, and reduction of zooplankton causes an increase of algal blooms that fish farmers want to control. Taxonomy: Phylum Chordata, Subphylum Vertebrata, Superclass Gnathostomata, Grade Pisces, Subgrade Teleostomi, Class Osteichthyes, Subclass Actinopterygii, Infraclass Neopterygii, Division Halecostomi, Subdivision Teleostei, Superorder Ostariophysi, Series Otophysi, Order Katelin Cross Cypriniformes, Suborder Cyprinoidei, Subfamily Hypophthalmichthyinae (Jennings 1988), and the Genus and Species Hypopthalmichthys nobilis . Order: Cypriniformes is the largest order of fish. There are more than 3200 species listed in this order. Cyprinids are found in abundance in Southeast Asia, Europe, Africa and North America. Cyprinids have pharyngeal dentition, which are tooth-bearing pharyngeal arches located in the throat region, and a highly protrusible upper jaw (Helfman 2009). Family: Cyprinidae is one of the largest vertebrate families with 1700 species. The majority of the Cyprinids are quite small and tend to be prey for piscivorous fishes. Minnows are either insectivorous or herbivores. Minnows produce an alarm substance in their skin that is only released when the skin is broken.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilapia Dageti ERSS
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tilapia dageti Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, June 2015 Photo not available. 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2015): “Africa: Upper Senegal, upper and middle Niger system, upper Comoe, Volta, Mono, Bénoué and Lake Chad [Teugels and Thys van den Audenaerde 2003].” Status in the United States This species has not been reported in the U.S. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported in the U.S. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2015): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Osteichthyes Class Actinopterygii Subclass Neopterygii Infraclass Teleostei Superorder Acanthopterygii Order Perciformes Suborder Labroidei Family Cichlidae Genus Tilapia Species Tilapia dageti Thys van den Audenaerde, 1971” “Taxonomic Status: valid” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2015): “Max length : 40.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Teugels and Thys van den Audenaerde 1991]; max. published weight: 1.0 kg [Ita 1984]” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2015): “Freshwater; demersal; potamodromous [Riede 2004].” Climate/Range From Froese and Pauly (2015): “Tropical; 24°C - 28°C [Baensch and Riehl 1995]; 15°N - 4°N” Distribution Outside the United States Native From Awaïss and Lalèyè (2015): “Burkina Faso; Cameroon; Chad; Côte d'Ivoire; Ghana; Guinea; Kenya; Mali; Niger; Nigeria; Togo” Introduced No introductions of this species have been reported. Means of Introduction Outside the United States No introductions of this species have been reported.
    [Show full text]