1 ±M^Jc1v1i\1N
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and the Literary Left
Draft of September 7, 2016 Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and the Literary Left Deirdre Nansen McCloskey An interview by W. Stockton and D. Gilson, eds., "Neoliberalism in Literary and Cultural Studies." Forthcoming as a special issue of either Public Cultures or Cultural Critique D.N.Mc: I am always glad to respond to queries from my friends on the left. I was myself once a Joan-Baez socialist, so I know how it feels, and honor the impulse. I’ve noticed that the right tends to think of folks on the left as merely misled, and therefore improvable by instruction—if they will but listen. The left, on the other hand, thinks of folks on the right as non-folk, as evil, as “pro-business,” as against the poor. Therefore the left is not ready to listen to the instruction so helpfully proffered by the right. Why listen to Hitler? For instance, no one among students of literature who considers herself deeply interested in the economy, and left-leaning since she was 16, bothers to read with the serious and open-minded attention she gives to a Harvey or Wallerstein or Jameson anything by Friedman or Mill or Smith. (Foucault, incidentally, was an interesting exception.) Please, dears. I’ve also noticed that the left assumes that it is dead easy to refute the so-called neoliberals. Yet the left does not actually understand most of the arguments the neoliberals make. I don’t mean it disagrees with the arguments. I mean it doesn’t understand them. Not at all. It’s easy to show. -
The Battle for Public Interest Law: Exploring the Orwellian Nature of the Freedom Based Public Interest Movement
The Battle for Public Interest Law: Exploring the Orwellian Nature of the Freedom Based Public Interest Movement † TIMOTHY L. FODEN I. INTRODUCTION Perform a brief Westlaw or Lexis search on the freedom-based public interest movement and you will come up with very little, if anything at all. Similarly, the typical survey class on public interest law offers no information on the more conservative and libertarian wing of the public interest movement. This lack of readily available information prompts a number of questions. Who are the people behind such organizations? Why is it difficult to find information on their work? What is the movement’s agenda? A brief look at a few of these organizations reveals a number of different goals. Freedom-based public interest groups advocate for traditionally conservative causes. Groups such as the Institute for Justice and the Pacific Legal Foundation have launched litigation campaigns against such institutions as the welfare system and the environmental regulatory regime. Other organizations such as the Alliance Defense Fund litigate for the insertion of religious symbols and practices in public spaces. Running the gamut of conservative causes, the freedom- based public interest legal movement has co-opted the once exclusively liberal term, public interest. The Orwellian name-game behind the self-asserted title “freedom-based public interest law movement”1 (“FBPILM”) is heavily responsible for the newly contested definition of public interest. The reason why there is a lack of ascertainable information on these groups is linked to their seemingly innocuous assumption of the term “public interest.” When thinking of public interest, the average lawyer or law † The author would like to thank Professor Richard Wilson for his encouragement of a peculiar topic that required a somewhat journalistic approach. -
A Response to the Libertarian Critics of Open-Borders Libertarianism
LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW __________________________________ VOLUME 4 FALL 2016 ISSUE 1 ____________________________________ A RESPONSE TO THE LIBERTARIAN CRITICS OF OPEN-BORDERS LIBERTARIANISM Walter E. Block, Ph.D. Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair and Professor of Economics Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business I. INTRODUCTION Libertarians may be unique in many regards, but their views on immigration do not qualify. They are as divided as is the rest of the population on this issue. Some favor open borders, and others oppose such a legal milieu. The present paper may be placed in the former category. It will outline both sides of this debate in sections II and III. Section IV is devoted to some additional arrows in the quiver of the closed border libertarians, and to a refutation of them. We conclude in section V. A RESPONSE TO THE LIBERTARIAN CRITICS OF OPEN-BORDERS LIBERTARIANISM 143 II. ANTI OPEN BORDERS The libertarian opposition to free immigration is straightforward and even elegant.1 It notes, first, a curious bifurcation in international economic relations. In the case of both trade and investment, there must necessarily be two2 parties who agree to the commercial interaction. In the former case, there must be an importer and an exporter; both are necessary. Without the consent of both parties, the transaction cannot take place. A similar situation arises concerning foreign investment. The entrepreneur who wishes to set up shop abroad must obtain the willing acquiescence of the domestic partner for the purchase of land and raw materials. And the same occurs with financial transactions that take place across 1 Peter Brimelow, ALIEN NATION: COMMON SENSE ABOUT AMERICA’S IMMIGRATION DISASTER (1995); Jesús Huerta De Soto, A Libertarian Theory of Free Immigration, 13 J. -
Beyond Academic Capitalism: Innovation and Entrepreneurship As Institutional Ethos at a Public Research University
ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: BEYOND ACADEMIC CAPITALISM: INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS INSTITUTIONAL ETHOS AT A PUBLIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY Kevin R. McClure, Doctor of Philosophy, 2014 Dissertation Directed by: Professor Nelly Stromquist International Education Policy Program Department of Counseling, Higher Education, and Special Education The theory of academic capitalism provides a cogent explanation of the actors, organizations, and networks that initiated a shift in U.S. higher education from a “public good knowledge/learning regime” to an emerging “academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime.” In the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime, the claims of entrepreneurs, administrators, and corporations—amidst amplified market forces—have come to supersede the claims of the public. Research thus far has not analyzed the process by which the multiple levels of higher education institutions adopt values and norms of the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime. Using case study methodology, this dissertation empirically examines the development and dissemination of an institutional ethos that, consistent with the theory of academic capitalism, has attributed great importance to innovation and entrepreneurship at a public doctoral/research-intensive university in the United States between 1998 and 2013. Specifically, I am interested in explaining why this ethos was initiated and supported by university leaders and how it has been translated into incentives for faculty members and academic opportunities for undergraduate students. Therefore, this dissertation traces academic capitalism as a multi-level process at one higher education institution. The findings demonstrate that meanings ascribed to innovation and entrepreneurship vary across the campus. However, there is a preponderance of language and examples derived from the for-profit sector. -
Marketplace of Ideas: but First, the Bill a Personal Commentary on American and European Cultural Funding by William Osborne As
Marketplace of Ideas: But First, The Bill A Personal Commentary On American and European Cultural Funding By William Osborne As an American who has lived in Europe for the last 24 years, I see on a daily basis how different the American and European economic systems are, and how deeply this affects the ways they produce, market and perceive art. America advocates supply-side economics, small government and free trade – all reflecting a belief that societies should minimize government expenditure and maximize deregulated, privatized global capitalism. Corporate freedom is considered a direct and analogous extension of personal freedom. Europeans, by contrast, hold to mixed economies with large social and cultural programs. Governmental spending often equals about half the GNP. Europeans argue that an unmitigated capitalism creates an isomorphic, corporate-dominated society with reduced individual and social options. Americans insist that privatization and the marketplace provide greater efficiency than governments. These two economic systems have created something of a cultural divide between Europeans and Americans. Germany’s public arts funding, for example, allows the country to have 23 times more full-time symphony orchestras per capita than the United States, and approximately 28 times more full-time opera houses. [1] In Europe, publicly funded cultural institutions are used to educate young people and this helps to maintain a high level of interest in the arts. In America, arts education faces constant cutbacks, which helps reduce interest. The Rise of Neo-Liberalism As a Cultural Paradigm The divisions between American and European arts-funding models are best understood if one briefly considers the changes that have evolved in U.S. -
Ideas in Progress, Episode 33, Postmodernist Libertarianism, with Nick Gillespie
Ideas in Progress, Episode 33, Postmodernist Libertarianism, with Nick Gillespie Anthony Comegna (00:24): Nick Gillespie is back with us this week, and, of course, you all know him as editor at large of Reason Magazine, host of The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie, and a regular analyst, I guess, at the Reason Roundtable Show. He's also, though, one of the precious few postmodernist libertarians out there. Believe it or not, some folks think that this is a contradiction in terms and that libertarians can only properly exist within the Lockean natural law framework. Anthony Comegna (00:54): But as I hope you'll all agree here, Nick Gillespie's libertarian credit is beyond doubt. In any case, though, I hope you all enjoy hearing him talk about this particular component of his ideas and perspective. Perhaps concluding, as I have, that postmodernism can offer us a much richer and deeper classical liberalism than the ones we're otherwise so used to. Let's get to it then, part two with Reason Magazine's Dr. Nick Gillespie. Anthony Comegna (01:25): All right, so we left off last time with some advice for graduate students, especially during the current COVID-19 crisis, and I actually want to talk with you about that a little bit because you cover it so much on your podcast, The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie. And I think it was on the Reason Roundtable last week, you were saying that you recently watched Team America and that it was like it was from a completely different world. -
Rape Law Revisited
Rape Law Revisited Aya Gruber Sexual Assault is everywhere. Have you heard this statement recently? Perhaps it was part of a federal government public awareness campaign urging that because of the ubiquity of sexual assault, its on us to stop it.1 Maybe the statement (or its equivalent) appeared during a news report on the military2 or was part of a freshman orientation inspired by Title IXthe federal antidiscrimination-in-education law that was once associated with womens sports programs but now is synonymous with student sexual harassment3where students were led to chant an enthusiastic yes.4 Certainly, the sentiment underlies in part the effort to modernize the Model Penal Codes sexual assault provisions.5 Indeed, the claim that rape is a widespread and worsening problem that affects all women and reflects deep gender inequality is no longer just a feminist mantra, but an increasingly accepted, uncontroversial, and even undebatable claim. But this is not what I mean by saying that sexual assault is everywhere. There is a distinct lack of evidence that rape or campus rape has become more frequent in the last decades.6 It is also exceedingly difficult to pinpoint just how widespread Professor of Law, University of Colorado Law School. Heartfelt thanks to Joshua Dressler for asking me to organize and guest-edit this symposium. I also express my deepest gratitude to the authors in the symposium for their excellent work. See Tonya Somanader, President Obama Launches the Its On Us Campaign to End Sexual Assault on Campus, WHITE HOUSE (Sept. 19, 2014), https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/09/19/president-obama-launches-its-us-campaign-end- sexual-assault-campus. -
Amanda Shanor, the New Lochner, 2016 Wisc. L. Rev
THE NEW LOCHNER AMANDA SHANOR* Commercial interests are increasingly laying claim, often successfully, to First Amendment protections. Once the mainstay of political liberty, the First Amendment has emerged as a powerful deregulatory engine—and one with great implications for modern governance. This Article identifies that development as a growing constitutional conflict between the First Amendment and the modern administrative state and analyzes its origins and implications. The Article traces two opposing trends that have led to that constitutional conflict. A business-led social movement has mobilized to embed libertarian-leaning understandings of the First Amendment in constitutional jurisprudence. At the same time, administrative regimes have moved away from command-and-control regulation towards lighter-touch forms of governance that appear more speech-regulating. The stakes of this conflict are high. Because nearly all human action operates through communication or expression, the First Amendment possesses near total deregulatory potential. For that reason, I argue that the First Amendment operates as the fullest boundary line of constitutional state action. I identify the unique features of this modern form of constitutional deregulation—which I call the new Lochner—by interrogating the parallel drawn by a growing number of scholars and judges between recent First Amendment jurisprudence and Lochner v. New York’s liberty of contract. The Article explores linkages between theories of the First Amendment and administrative law, and it analyzes the implications of the First Amendment’s deregulatory turn for understandings of democratic legitimacy, choice, and constitutional change. I argue that the new Lochner must be rejected because advocates of its deregulatory vision are forwarding a concept of liberty that has no limiting principle and, if taken to its analytical conclusion, would render self-government impossible. -
Reason.Tv Has a Dedicated Studio with Production Facilities That Give Us Both Greater Flexibility and Improved Quality
Raising the Torch of Liberty REASON FOUNDATION BUILDING CAMPAIGN REASON’S NEW HEADQUARTERS: CHANGING THE CULTURE Reason Foundation’s new headquarters puts us at the nexus of technical innovation and creativity, giving us the opportunity to use these two powerful levers to change the culture to one in favor of free minds and free markets. Reason’s new headquarters is in the center of the world we want to influence. Surrounded by dozens of media and production companies such as Sony Pictures Entertainment, Facebook, and YouTube, Reason’s new head- quarters is situated in Los Angeles’ hotbed of media and information technology. Reason’s new home sits on the eastern edge of the former Howard Hughes Airport and a few blocks from where a young actor named Ronald Reagan shot wartime training films. Movie classics such as The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind were filmed nearby on RKO’s famed Forty Acres lot, which is best remembered as the fic- tional town of Mayberry on the beloved television series The Andy Griffith Show. Today, media companies from all over the world are relocating to this prime location, and Hollywood insiders know the area as a hub for state-of-the-art motion picture facilities. This is where Reason needs to be. Reason Foundation Headquarters 5737 Mesmer Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90230 2 Click here to make an online donation to the Raising the Torch of Liberty Campaign! MESSAGE FROM REASON’S PRESIDENT OVER FORTY YEARS AGO, Reason co-founders Bob Poole, Manny Klausner, and Tibor Machan stood in Bob’s living room in Santa Barbara, surrounded by piles of the latest issue of Reason magazine, and wondered if the next issue of Reason would be the last. -
2016 Cardone Alfred 0435525
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Occupying the Tea Party The Rise of Contemporary Libertarian Culture in the United States Cardone, Alfred Christopher Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 Occupying the Tea Party: The Rise of Contemporary Libertarian Culture in the United States Volume I Alfred Christopher Cardone PhD in American Studies Research Acknowledgments I, firstly would like to thank King’s College, London for providing me with the opportunity to conduct these four years a truly impelling and fascinating research project. -
Ideas in Progress, Episode 32, Academic Non-Academia with Nick Gillespie
Ideas in Progress, Episode 32, Academic Non-Academia with Nick Gillespie Anthony Comegna (00:22): Oh my. Is this an exciting thing to say. This week on Ideas in Progress, Reason Magazine's, Nick Gillespie joins us. That's right. Do not adjust your sets. The Duke of Leather Jackets, the King of Weird Cultural References. And did you know this? A Ph.D. in English literature. Dr. Gillespie doesn't make a big deal about his degree, but I'm dying to know more about his time in academia. So here we are this week and next, it's Nick Gillespie on Ideas in Progress. All right, so Nick Gillespie, let's just start out with your how- I-became-an-academic story, because I listened to all the different Reason podcasts and a lot of other media with you in it and I'm not sure that I've ever actually heard you tell that story. Nick Gillespie (01:10): Are you joking? Because I feel like I talk about it all of the time, like to a point of embarrassment. Anthony Comegna (01:18): Well maybe I feel like I just haven't gotten a full enough explanation then. Nick Gillespie (01:22): Yeah, okay. Let's dial the clock back to 1985 which is when I graduated from Rutgers University, Rutgers College or Rutgers University with a B.A. in English and psychology. I worked as a journalist. I started out writing for some newspapers, stringing, freelancing and whatnot in New Jersey and in New York. -
IMMIGRANTS in AMERICA & Them Immigrants in America Essays by Peter Skerry, G
WQSum06.Final 6/20/06 2:09 PM Page 1 The Are Video India’s Path Getting a The “Bigger, Games Evil? to Greatness Grip on Better” WILSON By Chris By Martin Ourselves Nightmare Suellentrop Walker By Daniel Akst By James Morris The WILSON QUARTERLY SURVEYING THE WORLD OF IDEAS QUARTERLY Us IMMIGRANTS IN AMERICA & Them Immigrants in America Essays by Peter Skerry, G. Pascal Zachary, Blair A. Ruble, Stephen G. Bloom Summer 2006, Vol. 30. No.3 Summer 2006, Vol. SUMMER 2006 $6.95 ($9.95 CAN) The WILSON QUARTERLY SUMMER 2006 volume xxx, number 3 The Wilson Quarterly Published by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars www.wilsonquarterly.com FEATURES 14 Playing With Our Minds | By Chris Suellentrop Video games aren’t for adolescent geeks anymore—if they ever were. Now they’re powerful teaching tools, for better and for worse. DEPARTMENTS 22 India’s Path to Greatness | By Martin Walker 2 EDITOR’S COMMENT After decades as a backwater, India is jumping into the first rank of nations. Where it lands will shape Asia’s future—and America’s. 4 LETTERS 31 Who’s in Charge Here? | By Daniel Akst 11 FINDINGS Self-control is the new Holy Grail of virtues as the crimes of 75 Years Tall Dante’s Inferno become mere lifestyle choices. Damned Depressed The Smoke Hoods in the ’Hood 38 What’s New | By James Morris Puttin’ Off the Blitz The Next Big Thing could be bathtubs with diving boards. Notes on the great American quest for novelty. 69 In ESSENCE The Attack of the Killer Unknown 43 US & THEM: IMMIGRANTS IN AMERICA Race and Real Estate Today’s immigrants are not just more numerous than those of Does the Death Penalty Deter? the past.