Ideas in Progress, Episode 32, Academic Non-Academia with Nick Gillespie

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ideas in Progress, Episode 32, Academic Non-Academia with Nick Gillespie Ideas in Progress, Episode 32, Academic Non-Academia with Nick Gillespie Anthony Comegna (00:22): Oh my. Is this an exciting thing to say. This week on Ideas in Progress, Reason Magazine's, Nick Gillespie joins us. That's right. Do not adjust your sets. The Duke of Leather Jackets, the King of Weird Cultural References. And did you know this? A Ph.D. in English literature. Dr. Gillespie doesn't make a big deal about his degree, but I'm dying to know more about his time in academia. So here we are this week and next, it's Nick Gillespie on Ideas in Progress. All right, so Nick Gillespie, let's just start out with your how- I-became-an-academic story, because I listened to all the different Reason podcasts and a lot of other media with you in it and I'm not sure that I've ever actually heard you tell that story. Nick Gillespie (01:10): Are you joking? Because I feel like I talk about it all of the time, like to a point of embarrassment. Anthony Comegna (01:18): Well maybe I feel like I just haven't gotten a full enough explanation then. Nick Gillespie (01:22): Yeah, okay. Let's dial the clock back to 1985 which is when I graduated from Rutgers University, Rutgers College or Rutgers University with a B.A. in English and psychology. I worked as a journalist. I started out writing for some newspapers, stringing, freelancing and whatnot in New Jersey and in New York. I ended up lucking in through New York Times ads, when this was a thing, classified ads. I ended up getting jobs at a company that published teen magazines, movie magazines and music magazines. And I became a teen magazine editor and writer and a music journalist. I had always been into music and I was doing that for about three years. I would work, save money, go travel, come back, work, that type of thing. And there came a point in, I guess around 1988, where I was talking to a 10 year old teen star, who was going on about his latest project. And he said something along the lines of, "but what I really want to do is direct." Nick Gillespie (02:34): And I was like, okay, I got to get out of this world. This is killing me here. And I had also as an undergrad, but also as a young guy roaming around New York City mostly, I had written fiction, and I applied for graduate programs in creative writing, master's programs in creative writing. And I was accepted. Ultimately I took firm offers from, Oh God, I'm blanking on the name, it's the school in Boston that has a very good creative writing program and Jay Leno went to it, help me out here Anthony. Anthony Comegna (03:13): I have no idea. Nick Gillespie (03:16): Emerson, Emerson College. This is very good. You know, it's relatively early in the morning, but, so I was accepted at Emerson college and at Temple University in Philadelphia. And I had to push back my acceptance one year for a variety of reasons. And I ended up going to Temple University for an M.A. in English with a concentration in creative writing. Nick Gillespie (03:36): Institute for Humane Studios ©2020 Page 1 of 9 Ideas in Progress, Episode 32, Academic Non-Academia with Nick Gillespie And I will tell you, having worked for three years and I was reading voraciously, I had always been a big reader, but I loved reading, I loved commercial culture and I wanted to be creative. And when I got to Temple, which is generally considered a ... the Creative Writing Program was very highly regarded, the general school, not so much. But I had a two year experience there that absolutely lit my brain on fire. I worked with a series of academics in the literature program. I ended up taking all of the creative writing courses, but I took enough credits basically to have a Master's in literature as well. And they were people who were at the cutting edge of things like postmodernism. This was 1988, as well as a guy named Robert Storey who was one of the first academics to seriously apply evolutionary psychology and sociobiology as it was known then, to literary and cultural studies. Nick Gillespie (04:39): And it was the most exhilarating intellectual experience of my life up to that point and since that point, if I'm being fully honest. I met my future wife, who is also my future ex-wife, Catherine Gillespie, who now teaches at Chapman university. She's a full professor working in Vernon Smith's Economic Center out there, the Adam Smith Institute. We met at Temple and we ended up jointly deciding to go on for PhDs and we went to the State University of New York at Buffalo where I was particularly interested in working with Leslie Fiedler, Mark Schechner and a couple of other people who were American scholars, scholars of American literature. So I went to Buffalo and I went through my coursework there, which was also exhilarating and deep. Buffalo had a program at the time, and it's still known for this, but as a kind of mavericky English department. Nick Gillespie (05:39): Leslie Fiedler is a guy who died years ago, but who along with Harold Bloom is one of the very biggest names or biggest influences in American literary and cultural studies. And Fiedler was a wild man. He loved going out onto the margins of society and finding interesting writing, interesting people, interesting things going on and reporting back. He's the ... and I don't know how deep in the weeds this is for your listeners, Howard Bloom is very much of a canon builder. He's a guy who, he was based at Yale and he was very establishment. He both worked through the establishment and then tried to create his own establishment. This is great literature. This is the creation of the West. This is why Shakespeare is perfect. Fiedler was much more kind of scrounging around the margins and [inaudible 00:06:28] great writer, a great thinker. He's the guy that I wanted to work with more than anyone at Buffalo, and I got a chance to do that. Nick Gillespie (06:34): While I was working on my dissertation, I had about half of it done, I came to the realization, and now we're talking about 1993, and this was a period in which the concept and the reality of political correctness really came into the forefront. And I don't want to trivialize this or simplify it, but what political correctness really stood for in my understanding was a kind of politicization of the academy that I believe started with the election of George H W Bush in 1988. Academics lost their minds because they were convinced that Reagan was an anomaly and that the country would go back to some kind of vaguely civilized reasoning after this brief interregnum. And when Bush got elected, they just lost it and they became much more desperate to kind of proselytize to students at all levels that we are, we need to be more serious about kind of being left wing and progressive and we need to take our country back. You heard that all the time. Nick Gillespie (07:43): Institute for Humane Studios ©2020 Page 2 of 9 Ideas in Progress, Episode 32, Academic Non-Academia with Nick Gillespie So in any case with that as a backdrop, I realized I probably was not cut out for academia given my ideological leanings and my political and cultural leanings, which were very libertarian, very anti- conservative as well as anti left-wing. And I had always been reading Reason Magazine since I was in high school. My brother who also went to Rutgers, which is where Milton Friedman did his undergrad of all places, my brother discovered Reason in college and started mailing it back to me, and I read it and I subscribed to it from the time I was in high school through, till now I guess. And they advertised for an assistant editor job in their back pages. And I applied for that and got it. Nick Gillespie (08:33): And we moved. At the time I was married, my wife was pregnant with our first child, and we moved to LA for me to work at Reason while she finished her dissertation and had our child. And that's when I exited academia strictly. I'll come back to my intersections with it since then, which been profound. And my wife became a full-fledged tenure track academic and we can talk a little bit about where that took us. And then I finished my dissertation in 1996 on American literature in the 19th and 20th centuries. Anthony Comegna (09:12): Did you ever teach while you were in graduate school? Nick Gillespie (09:14): Yes, this is one of the things that I would say, and to be honest, I'm not sure how much it has changed, but I was told by everybody, and I come from a nonacademic background. I grew up lower middle class. My father didn't even graduate high school, much less college. My mother went to a business high school and was a bookkeeper who had trouble with long division.
Recommended publications
  • Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and the Literary Left
    Draft of September 7, 2016 Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and the Literary Left Deirdre Nansen McCloskey An interview by W. Stockton and D. Gilson, eds., "Neoliberalism in Literary and Cultural Studies." Forthcoming as a special issue of either Public Cultures or Cultural Critique D.N.Mc: I am always glad to respond to queries from my friends on the left. I was myself once a Joan-Baez socialist, so I know how it feels, and honor the impulse. I’ve noticed that the right tends to think of folks on the left as merely misled, and therefore improvable by instruction—if they will but listen. The left, on the other hand, thinks of folks on the right as non-folk, as evil, as “pro-business,” as against the poor. Therefore the left is not ready to listen to the instruction so helpfully proffered by the right. Why listen to Hitler? For instance, no one among students of literature who considers herself deeply interested in the economy, and left-leaning since she was 16, bothers to read with the serious and open-minded attention she gives to a Harvey or Wallerstein or Jameson anything by Friedman or Mill or Smith. (Foucault, incidentally, was an interesting exception.) Please, dears. I’ve also noticed that the left assumes that it is dead easy to refute the so-called neoliberals. Yet the left does not actually understand most of the arguments the neoliberals make. I don’t mean it disagrees with the arguments. I mean it doesn’t understand them. Not at all. It’s easy to show.
    [Show full text]
  • A Response to the Libertarian Critics of Open-Borders Libertarianism
    LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW __________________________________ VOLUME 4 FALL 2016 ISSUE 1 ____________________________________ A RESPONSE TO THE LIBERTARIAN CRITICS OF OPEN-BORDERS LIBERTARIANISM Walter E. Block, Ph.D. Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair and Professor of Economics Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business I. INTRODUCTION Libertarians may be unique in many regards, but their views on immigration do not qualify. They are as divided as is the rest of the population on this issue. Some favor open borders, and others oppose such a legal milieu. The present paper may be placed in the former category. It will outline both sides of this debate in sections II and III. Section IV is devoted to some additional arrows in the quiver of the closed border libertarians, and to a refutation of them. We conclude in section V. A RESPONSE TO THE LIBERTARIAN CRITICS OF OPEN-BORDERS LIBERTARIANISM 143 II. ANTI OPEN BORDERS The libertarian opposition to free immigration is straightforward and even elegant.1 It notes, first, a curious bifurcation in international economic relations. In the case of both trade and investment, there must necessarily be two2 parties who agree to the commercial interaction. In the former case, there must be an importer and an exporter; both are necessary. Without the consent of both parties, the transaction cannot take place. A similar situation arises concerning foreign investment. The entrepreneur who wishes to set up shop abroad must obtain the willing acquiescence of the domestic partner for the purchase of land and raw materials. And the same occurs with financial transactions that take place across 1 Peter Brimelow, ALIEN NATION: COMMON SENSE ABOUT AMERICA’S IMMIGRATION DISASTER (1995); Jesús Huerta De Soto, A Libertarian Theory of Free Immigration, 13 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Academic Capitalism: Innovation and Entrepreneurship As Institutional Ethos at a Public Research University
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: BEYOND ACADEMIC CAPITALISM: INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS INSTITUTIONAL ETHOS AT A PUBLIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY Kevin R. McClure, Doctor of Philosophy, 2014 Dissertation Directed by: Professor Nelly Stromquist International Education Policy Program Department of Counseling, Higher Education, and Special Education The theory of academic capitalism provides a cogent explanation of the actors, organizations, and networks that initiated a shift in U.S. higher education from a “public good knowledge/learning regime” to an emerging “academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime.” In the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime, the claims of entrepreneurs, administrators, and corporations—amidst amplified market forces—have come to supersede the claims of the public. Research thus far has not analyzed the process by which the multiple levels of higher education institutions adopt values and norms of the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime. Using case study methodology, this dissertation empirically examines the development and dissemination of an institutional ethos that, consistent with the theory of academic capitalism, has attributed great importance to innovation and entrepreneurship at a public doctoral/research-intensive university in the United States between 1998 and 2013. Specifically, I am interested in explaining why this ethos was initiated and supported by university leaders and how it has been translated into incentives for faculty members and academic opportunities for undergraduate students. Therefore, this dissertation traces academic capitalism as a multi-level process at one higher education institution. The findings demonstrate that meanings ascribed to innovation and entrepreneurship vary across the campus. However, there is a preponderance of language and examples derived from the for-profit sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketplace of Ideas: but First, the Bill a Personal Commentary on American and European Cultural Funding by William Osborne As
    Marketplace of Ideas: But First, The Bill A Personal Commentary On American and European Cultural Funding By William Osborne As an American who has lived in Europe for the last 24 years, I see on a daily basis how different the American and European economic systems are, and how deeply this affects the ways they produce, market and perceive art. America advocates supply-side economics, small government and free trade – all reflecting a belief that societies should minimize government expenditure and maximize deregulated, privatized global capitalism. Corporate freedom is considered a direct and analogous extension of personal freedom. Europeans, by contrast, hold to mixed economies with large social and cultural programs. Governmental spending often equals about half the GNP. Europeans argue that an unmitigated capitalism creates an isomorphic, corporate-dominated society with reduced individual and social options. Americans insist that privatization and the marketplace provide greater efficiency than governments. These two economic systems have created something of a cultural divide between Europeans and Americans. Germany’s public arts funding, for example, allows the country to have 23 times more full-time symphony orchestras per capita than the United States, and approximately 28 times more full-time opera houses. [1] In Europe, publicly funded cultural institutions are used to educate young people and this helps to maintain a high level of interest in the arts. In America, arts education faces constant cutbacks, which helps reduce interest. The Rise of Neo-Liberalism As a Cultural Paradigm The divisions between American and European arts-funding models are best understood if one briefly considers the changes that have evolved in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideas in Progress, Episode 33, Postmodernist Libertarianism, with Nick Gillespie
    Ideas in Progress, Episode 33, Postmodernist Libertarianism, with Nick Gillespie Anthony Comegna (00:24): Nick Gillespie is back with us this week, and, of course, you all know him as editor at large of Reason Magazine, host of The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie, and a regular analyst, I guess, at the Reason Roundtable Show. He's also, though, one of the precious few postmodernist libertarians out there. Believe it or not, some folks think that this is a contradiction in terms and that libertarians can only properly exist within the Lockean natural law framework. Anthony Comegna (00:54): But as I hope you'll all agree here, Nick Gillespie's libertarian credit is beyond doubt. In any case, though, I hope you all enjoy hearing him talk about this particular component of his ideas and perspective. Perhaps concluding, as I have, that postmodernism can offer us a much richer and deeper classical liberalism than the ones we're otherwise so used to. Let's get to it then, part two with Reason Magazine's Dr. Nick Gillespie. Anthony Comegna (01:25): All right, so we left off last time with some advice for graduate students, especially during the current COVID-19 crisis, and I actually want to talk with you about that a little bit because you cover it so much on your podcast, The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie. And I think it was on the Reason Roundtable last week, you were saying that you recently watched Team America and that it was like it was from a completely different world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rape Law Revisited
    Rape Law Revisited Aya Gruber Sexual Assault is everywhere. Have you heard this statement recently? Perhaps it was part of a federal government public awareness campaign urging that because of the ubiquity of sexual assault, its on us to stop it.1 Maybe the statement (or its equivalent) appeared during a news report on the military2 or was part of a freshman orientation inspired by Title IXthe federal antidiscrimination-in-education law that was once associated with womens sports programs but now is synonymous with student sexual harassment3where students were led to chant an enthusiastic yes.4 Certainly, the sentiment underlies in part the effort to modernize the Model Penal Codes sexual assault provisions.5 Indeed, the claim that rape is a widespread and worsening problem that affects all women and reflects deep gender inequality is no longer just a feminist mantra, but an increasingly accepted, uncontroversial, and even undebatable claim. But this is not what I mean by saying that sexual assault is everywhere. There is a distinct lack of evidence that rape or campus rape has become more frequent in the last decades.6 It is also exceedingly difficult to pinpoint just how widespread Professor of Law, University of Colorado Law School. Heartfelt thanks to Joshua Dressler for asking me to organize and guest-edit this symposium. I also express my deepest gratitude to the authors in the symposium for their excellent work. See Tonya Somanader, President Obama Launches the Its On Us Campaign to End Sexual Assault on Campus, WHITE HOUSE (Sept. 19, 2014), https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/09/19/president-obama-launches-its-us-campaign-end- sexual-assault-campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Reason.Tv Has a Dedicated Studio with Production Facilities That Give Us Both Greater Flexibility and Improved Quality
    Raising the Torch of Liberty REASON FOUNDATION BUILDING CAMPAIGN REASON’S NEW HEADQUARTERS: CHANGING THE CULTURE Reason Foundation’s new headquarters puts us at the nexus of technical innovation and creativity, giving us the opportunity to use these two powerful levers to change the culture to one in favor of free minds and free markets. Reason’s new headquarters is in the center of the world we want to influence. Surrounded by dozens of media and production companies such as Sony Pictures Entertainment, Facebook, and YouTube, Reason’s new head- quarters is situated in Los Angeles’ hotbed of media and information technology. Reason’s new home sits on the eastern edge of the former Howard Hughes Airport and a few blocks from where a young actor named Ronald Reagan shot wartime training films. Movie classics such as The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind were filmed nearby on RKO’s famed Forty Acres lot, which is best remembered as the fic- tional town of Mayberry on the beloved television series The Andy Griffith Show. Today, media companies from all over the world are relocating to this prime location, and Hollywood insiders know the area as a hub for state-of-the-art motion picture facilities. This is where Reason needs to be. Reason Foundation Headquarters 5737 Mesmer Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90230 2 Click here to make an online donation to the Raising the Torch of Liberty Campaign! MESSAGE FROM REASON’S PRESIDENT OVER FORTY YEARS AGO, Reason co-founders Bob Poole, Manny Klausner, and Tibor Machan stood in Bob’s living room in Santa Barbara, surrounded by piles of the latest issue of Reason magazine, and wondered if the next issue of Reason would be the last.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Cardone Alfred 0435525
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Occupying the Tea Party The Rise of Contemporary Libertarian Culture in the United States Cardone, Alfred Christopher Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 Occupying the Tea Party: The Rise of Contemporary Libertarian Culture in the United States Volume I Alfred Christopher Cardone PhD in American Studies Research Acknowledgments I, firstly would like to thank King’s College, London for providing me with the opportunity to conduct these four years a truly impelling and fascinating research project.
    [Show full text]
  • IMMIGRANTS in AMERICA & Them Immigrants in America Essays by Peter Skerry, G
    WQSum06.Final 6/20/06 2:09 PM Page 1 The Are Video India’s Path Getting a The “Bigger, Games Evil? to Greatness Grip on Better” WILSON By Chris By Martin Ourselves Nightmare Suellentrop Walker By Daniel Akst By James Morris The WILSON QUARTERLY SURVEYING THE WORLD OF IDEAS QUARTERLY Us IMMIGRANTS IN AMERICA & Them Immigrants in America Essays by Peter Skerry, G. Pascal Zachary, Blair A. Ruble, Stephen G. Bloom Summer 2006, Vol. 30. No.3 Summer 2006, Vol. SUMMER 2006 $6.95 ($9.95 CAN) The WILSON QUARTERLY SUMMER 2006 volume xxx, number 3 The Wilson Quarterly Published by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars www.wilsonquarterly.com FEATURES 14 Playing With Our Minds | By Chris Suellentrop Video games aren’t for adolescent geeks anymore—if they ever were. Now they’re powerful teaching tools, for better and for worse. DEPARTMENTS 22 India’s Path to Greatness | By Martin Walker 2 EDITOR’S COMMENT After decades as a backwater, India is jumping into the first rank of nations. Where it lands will shape Asia’s future—and America’s. 4 LETTERS 31 Who’s in Charge Here? | By Daniel Akst 11 FINDINGS Self-control is the new Holy Grail of virtues as the crimes of 75 Years Tall Dante’s Inferno become mere lifestyle choices. Damned Depressed The Smoke Hoods in the ’Hood 38 What’s New | By James Morris Puttin’ Off the Blitz The Next Big Thing could be bathtubs with diving boards. Notes on the great American quest for novelty. 69 In ESSENCE The Attack of the Killer Unknown 43 US & THEM: IMMIGRANTS IN AMERICA Race and Real Estate Today’s immigrants are not just more numerous than those of Does the Death Penalty Deter? the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Criminal Justice
    Reforming Criminal Justice Volume 1: Introduction and Criminalization Erik Luna Editor and Project Director Reforming Criminal Justice Volume 1: Introduction and Criminalization Erik Luna Editor and Project Director a report by The Academy for Justice with the support of Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved This report and its contents may be used for non-profit educational and training purposes and for legal reform (legislative, judicial, and executive) without written permission but with a citation to the report. The Academy for Justice www.academyforjustice.org Erik Luna, Project Director A project of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Arizona State University Mail Code 9520 111 E. Taylor St. Phoenix, AZ 85004-4467 (480) 965-6181 https://law.asu.edu/ Suggested Citation Bluebook: 1 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE: INTRODUCTION AND CRIMINALIZATION (Erik Luna ed., 2017). APA: Luna, E. (Ed.). (2017). Reforming Criminal Justice: Introduction and Criminalization (Vol. 1). Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University. CMS: Luna, Erik, ed. Reforming Criminal Justice. Vol. 1, Introduction and Criminalization. Phoenix: Arizona State University, 2017. Printed in the United States of America Summary of Report Contents Volume 1: Introduction and Criminalization Preface—Erik Luna Criminal Justice Reform: An Introduction—Clint Bolick The Changing Politics of Crime and the Future of Mass Incarceration— David Cole Overcriminalization—Douglas Husak Overfederalization—Stephen F. Smith Misdemeanors—Alexandra Natapoff Drug Prohibition and Violence—Jeffrey A. Miron Marijuana Legalization—Alex Kreit Sexual Offenses—Robert Weisberg Firearms and Violence—Franklin E. Zimring Gangs—Scott H. Decker Criminalizing Immigration—Jennifer M. Chacón Extraterritorial Jurisdiction—Julie Rose O’Sullivan Mental Disorder and Criminal Justice—Stephen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript (PDF)
    www.fff.org The Future of Libertarianism by Justin Raimondo The following is a transcript of a speech given at The Future of Freedom Foundation’s June 2008 conference, “Restoring the Republic: Foreign Policy & Civil Liberties” held in Reston, Virginia. Jacob Hornberger: Justin Raimondo, our next speaker, is editorial director of Antiwar.com, which is the premier anti-war website on the Internet. It’s the website that we go to every single morning. There is no better website and hasn’t been for many years. It has as much information, commentary, insights, blogs, everything-- it’s just fantastic. Justin himself writes one of the most informative and entertaining columns on politics, foreign policy,, and civil liberties. It’s one of those columns where you don’t quite know what you’re going to get, which makes it very exciting and stimulating. The column’s entitled “Behind the Headlines.” I think he writes three times a week, a lengthy commentary on what’s going on. He is the author of An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard and Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement, which is an intellectual history of the pre- World War II conservative anti-imperialist tradition. The title of Justin’s talk is “The Future of Libertarianism.” Justin Raimondo. Justin Raimondo: My topic today, “The Future of Libertarianism,” cannot be broached without reference to Libertarianism’s long and storied past, and so I hope you’ll forgive this extensive prelude before I get to the main topic. Now, from the very beginning, the laissez-faire movement was beset by a thrilling but utterly mistaken idea that progress toward liberty is inevitable, a long, slow, steady process that coincides with the march of modernity.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Magazine June 2007.Pdf Mime Type
    Sparta 300 June 2007 $4.00 Persia 0 ~vorse than death. II - Andrew Hamilton June 2007 Inside Liberty Volume 21, Number 6 4 Letters Our readers fight the power. 7 Reflections We stroll through Baghdad, score at the World Bank, corner the chicken market, breed less sheepish sheep, wrestle a bloodthirsty lion, diagnose an old malady, smuggle light bulbs, break a leg, and add a venerable American species to the endangered list. Features 21 A Freewheeling Debate Bookstores across the nation are featuring Brian Doherty's history of the libertarian movement. Bruce Ramsey and Lanny Ebenstein study the phenomenon; Doherty provides his own account. 29 Borking Up the Wrong Tree When it comes to legal principles, modern conservatives can be as dangerous as modern liberals. Timothy Sandefur shows what's under the sheep's clothing. 35 The Founding of the Party John Hospers, one of the select group of Americans who have ever received a vote in the Electoral College, tells how it's done. 38 A Generation of Slackers Michael Christian surveys the age of porcelain and skateboards. Reviews 41 Lies Your Teachers Are Telling You Gary Jason runs down the myths that keep public school budgets high and test scores really low. 46 Sparta 300, Persia 0 The story told in 1/300" is a great one, Liam Vavasour admits. But the story told by history is even better. 47 Fondly Remembering Karl Hess Richard Kostelanetz savors the heyday of American anarchism. 48 Pax Reagana Reagan may have muffed his lines about domestic matters. But, as Martin Morse Wooster finds, he played his part on the international stage almost to perfection.
    [Show full text]