Spite and Prejudice: Diplomarbeit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Spite and Prejudice: Race and Racism in Shakespeare’s Othello and its Post-Colonial Adaptations Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Magisters der Philosophie an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz vorgelegt von Michael MÜNZER am Institut für Anglistik Begutachterin: Ao. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr.phil. Maria Löschnigg Graz, 2020 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne fremde Hilfe verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen nicht benutzt und Stellen, die den Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommen wurden, als solche kenntlich gemacht habe. Ich habe diese Diplomarbeit weder im In- oder Ausland in irgendeiner Form als Prüfungsarbeit vorgelegt. Die elektronische Version der Arbeit stimmt textlich mit der gedruckten Version überein. Graz, August 2020, Michael Münzer Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Maria Löschnigg. All throughout my studies, you have been an academic role model. You (re)kindled my love for literature and provided me with the necessary ‘tools’ to pursue this diploma thesis. Since the moment I started writing my thesis, you have had a sympathetic ear for my questions and concerns. I could not have asked for a better advisor. Thank you! I would also like to thank my family. Mom and Dad, thank you so much for your continued moral, financial, and emotional support – not only in the process of writing my thesis, but all throughout my studies. This accomplishment would have not been possible without you! Opa und Oma, vielen Dank für eure andauernde Unterstützung. Ich hoffe, ihr seid stolz auf mich. Münzer Opa und Münzer Oma, ihr hattet einen großen Anteil daran, dass ich studieren und Lehrer werden wollte. Leider ist es uns nicht vergönnt, den Abschluss meines Studiums gemeinsam zu feiern. Ich weiß, ihr hättet euch sehr für mich gefreut! Marlene, thank you for always believing in me. Your unconditional love and support mean so much to me. I love you! Last, but certainly not least, I would like to thank Christina, Jakob, and my other ‘partners in crime’. You have made my time at university an absolute treat and I truly appreciate our friendship. I will always cherish those memories. Table of Contents Introduction 1 1 The Making of Othello: Historical and Intertextual Influences 6 1.1 Elizabethan ‘Zeitgeist’ in a Venetian Society – The Play in its Historical Context 11 1.2 Foreign Lands, Foreign Peoples: Stereotypes, Preoccupations, and Encounters with the African Continent 13 1.2.1 The Term ‘Moor’ as a Highly Ambiguous Denomination for People of Colour 15 2 Experiencing Othello: Stage Tradition and Receptive History 18 2.1 ‘Black’, ‘White’, ‘Tawny’? ‘Moorishness’ and the Casting of Othello throughout the Play’s Performance History 22 2.2. “What you know, you know”. How Racial Anxiety and Perceptions of ‘the Moor’ Shape(d) the Reception of Othello 28 2.2.1. Othello’s Critical Afterlife from the 19th Century Onwards: (Re)Defining the ‘Moor’ 33 3 What is Said, What is Meant: The Analysis of Racist Discourse in Othello 39 3.1 ‘Let’s agree to disagree’: Interpretations of Race and Racism in Othello 42 3.2. Who is Racist and Why? A Contemporary Reading of Racist Discourse in Othello 45 3.2.1 Black vs. White – ‘Foul’ vs. ‘Fair’: Colour as a Vehicle to Communicate (Racial) Difference 54 4 Post-Colonial Engagements: (Re)Considering Shakespeare’s Othello 56 4.1. Repetition, Resistance, Reinterpretation: A New Othello? 59 4.2. Performative Counter Discourse and Othello on Stage and Screen 65 4.3. Shakespeare and Othello in the ‘Land of the Free’ 72 4.4 “I must write to save my own life” – Exploring the Effects of Race and Sex on African Americans in Harlem Duet 77 4.4.1 ‘The Nightmare and the Dream’ Narrated in Harlem Duet 79 Conclusion 93 Works Cited 96 Introduction According to Andreas Mahler, Shakespeare’s plays have always tested the limits of early- modern consciousness. Debating societal, gender-specific, and global norms, they rarely provided answers, but rather contraposed ideological attitudes. Towards the end of the 16th century, English drama has become an agency of candour and ambivalence and one could very well make the argument that at least the aspect of ambivalence has carried over to the receptive history of Shakespeare’s plays (cf. Mahler 2018: 318f). Perhaps, it is the equivocation of Shakespeare’s works which has allowed his creative legacy to stand the test of time. Especially his tragedies seem to have frequently ‘struck a nerve’ as they have often responded to contemporary concerns and developments. Mahler explains Shakespeare’s continuing power to impress readers, audiences and critics alike as follows: Shakespeare ist Theatermann, nicht Ideologe […]. Gerade hierin liegt die Wirkmacht seine Werkes: Nicht in der Überzeugungskraft der Antworten, sondern im steten Angebot erneuter Durchspielbarkeit der Fragen – der Fragen nach Sozialordnung, Geschlechterverhältnis, der Begegnung mit dem Anderen, der Leistung von Fiktion. (2018: 319) For generations of post-Romantic intellectuals, the “existential prison of Hamlet was the place [which represented] the angst ridden- image of [their] own alienation” (Neill 2006: 1). In the aftermath of World War II, “it was the wasteland of King Lear that provided a mirror for humanity living under the shadow of holocaust and nuclear devastation” (Neill 2006: 1). As the Age of Imperialism seemed to expire and the Empire’s façade, amidst human rights movements and nationalist ambitions, slowly but surely began to crumble, it was Othello which caught the contemporary ‘zeitgeist’. Towards the end of the 20th century and fuelled by progressive and anti-imperial criticism, Neill points out that “critics and directors alike began to trace in the cultural, religious and ethnic animosities of [Othello’s] Mediterranean setting, the genealogy of the racial conflicts that fractured their own societies” (2006: 1). In the words of Edward Pechter, “Othello has become the Shakespearean tragedy of choice for the present generation. [It is] the tragedy that speaks most directly and powerfully to current interests.” (1999: 2) Unsurprisingly, what Ingrid Hotz-Davis refers to as the “sorgfältig gezeichnete psychologisch ausformulierte Bestandsaufnahme des Entstehens einer Eifersucht und des Zerfalls einer Beziehung” (2018: 470) has inspired the long tradition of reading Othello primarily as a ‘domestic tragedy’. By the 1980s, however, the social and political implications of the play have gained considerable scholarly attention. Ever since, researchers and critics of Othello have 1 been focusing on four main subjects of Shakespeare’s tragedy: global political issues of the late 16th and early 17th century, such as the conflict between Christianity and Islam, the disintegration of feudalism and its norms of behaviour, gender-relations in a patriarchal society, and early-modern-age racism (cf. Schülting 2018: 539). Against the backdrop of the long tradition of (scholarly) engagement with the play, particularly the history of the examination of aspects of race and racism in Othello has been one of surprising briefness. Even though issues of race and racism have resurfaced from time to time throughout Othello’s theatrical and critical afterlife, a noticeable and sustainable treatment of the play’s ‘race theme’ has only come to the fore in contemporary, and especially in post-colonial criticism. Thus, the long-standing absence of scholarly interest in issues of race and racism throughout Othello’s stage, receptive, and scholarly history has to be considered one of the most striking aspects in the engagement with Shakespeare’s Othello – especially in consideration of the play’s highly racist performative and receptive tradition. Given that Othello undoubtedly responds to issues of race and racism in one way or the other, a possible starting question to an investigation of this aspect in the play could perhaps read as follows: Is Othello racist? This is no question I even dare to attempt answering in this diploma thesis, however, as I personally believe that there is no definite answer to be found. Othello simply does not allow for easy binaries. Virginia Vaughan might have already found the fitting response to an unanswerable question: “I think this play is racist and I think it’s not […]” (1996: 69f). Another important question might be whether it even bears any sense to talk about race in Othello? As Neill points out, “to talk about race in Othello is to fall into anachronism; yet not to talk about it is to ignore something fundamental about a play that has rightly come to be identified as a foundational text in the emergence of modern European racial consciousness […]” (1998: 361). Hence, one finds him/herself in a precarious situation as Othello clearly deals with issues of race and furthermore features characters and speech acts that, by ‘modern standards’, would most definitely be categorized as highly racist. Othello, however, was written and plays in a time when modern categories of race did not exist, and racist or highly prejudiced behaviour against ‘racial Others’ was not (yet) considered problematic. In Shakespeare’s time, Germans were a race, Florentines were a race, and so were ‘Moors’, and each of them possessed certain traits that distinguished them from the English. As the title indicates, this diploma thesis investigates race and racism in Othello. My goal is to not only deal with the text itself, but also take into account crucial stages in the staging and reception of Shakespeare’s play. My thesis will be founded on three crucial realisations. First, 2 Othello is a product of its time and as such remains firmly located in a certain historical context. Shakespeare lived and wrote at a time when European colonialism was in its relatively early stages, English mercantile and colonial projects were only starting to emerge, and a European racial consciousness began to develop.
Recommended publications
  • Othello and Its Rewritings, from Nineteenth-Century Burlesque to Post- Colonial Tragedy

    Othello and Its Rewritings, from Nineteenth-Century Burlesque to Post- Colonial Tragedy

    Black Rams and Extravagant Strangers: Shakespeare’s Othello and its Rewritings, from Nineteenth-Century Burlesque to Post- Colonial Tragedy Catherine Ann Rosario Goldsmiths, University of London PhD thesis 1 Declaration I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. 2 Acknowledgements Firstly, I want to thank my supervisor John London for his immense generosity, as it is through countless discussions with him that I have been able to crystallise and evolve my ideas. I should also like to thank my family who, as ever, have been so supportive, and my parents, in particular, for engaging with my research, and Ebi for being Ebi. Talking things over with my friends, and getting feedback, has also been very helpful. My particular thanks go to Lucy Jenks, Jay Luxembourg, Carrie Byrne, Corin Depper, Andrew Bryant, Emma Pask, Tony Crowley and Gareth Krisman, and to Rob Lapsley whose brilliant Theory evening classes first inspired me to return to academia. Lastly, I should like to thank all the assistance that I have had from Goldsmiths Library, the British Library, Senate House Library, the Birmingham Shakespeare Collection at Birmingham Central Library, Shakespeare’s Birthplace Trust and the Shakespeare Centre Library and Archive. 3 Abstract The labyrinthine levels through which Othello moves, as Shakespeare draws on myriad theatrical forms in adapting a bald little tale, gives his characters a scintillating energy, a refusal to be domesticated in language. They remain as Derridian monsters, evading any enclosures, with the tragedy teetering perilously close to farce. Because of this fragility of identity, and Shakespeare’s radical decision to have a black tragic protagonist, Othello has attracted subsequent dramatists caught in their own identity struggles.
  • Djanet Sears's Appropriations of Shakespeare in Harlem Duet

    Djanet Sears's Appropriations of Shakespeare in Harlem Duet

    The Dramaturgy of Appropriation: How Canadian Playwrights Use and Abuse Shakespeare and Chekhov by James Stuart McKinnon A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Centre for the Study of Drama University of Toronto © Copyright by James McKinnon 2010 The Dramaturgy of Appropriation: How Canadian Playwrights Use and Abuse Shakespeare and Chekhov James Stuart McKinnon Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Centre for the Study of Drama University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Both theatre and drama were imported to Canada from European colonizing nations, and as such the canonical master-texts of European drama, particularly the works of Shakespeare, have always occupied a prominent place in Canadian theatre. This presents a challenge for living Canadian playwrights, whose most revered role model is also their most dangerous competition, and whose desire to represent the spectrum of contemporary Canadian experience on stage is often at odds with the preferences of many producers and spectators for the ―classics.‖ Since the 1990s, a number of Canadian playwrights have attempted to challenge the role of canonical plays and the values they represent by appropriating and critiquing them in plays of their own, creating a body of work which disturbs conventional distinctions between ―adaptations‖ and ―originals.‖ This study describes and analyzes the adaptive dramaturgies used by recent Canadian playwrights to appropriate canonical plays, question the privileged place they occupy in Canadian culture, expose the exclusionary hierarchies they legitimate, and claim centre stage for Canadian perspectives which have hitherto been waiting in the wings. It examines how playwrights challenge, usurp, or exploit the cultural capital of the canon by ―re-citing‖ old plays ii in new works, how they or their producers attempt to frame the reception of their plays in order to address cultural biases against adaptation, and how audiences respond.
  • Canadian Revisionist Drama: Performing Race, Sexuality, and the Cultural Imaginary

    Canadian Revisionist Drama: Performing Race, Sexuality, and the Cultural Imaginary

    CANADIAN REVISIONIST DRAMA: PERFORMING RACE, SEXUALITY, AND THE CULTURAL IMAGINARY by Kailin Wright A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Kailin Wright, 2012 Canadian Revisionist Drama: Performing Race, Sexuality, and the Cultural Imaginary Kailin Wright Doctor of Philosophy Department of English, University of Toronto, 2012 Abstract My dissertation examines how Canadian revisionist plays adapt popular narratives—national histories, Greek myths, Shakespearean plays, and colonial legends—by changing the identities of marginalized characters and cultural groups. While Linda Hutcheon defines adaptation as repetition with difference, I define revisionist drama as repetition with politicized difference. It is this politicized difference that transforms the identifications of the original marginalized characters, and, as a result, changes their roles in the cultural imaginary. Canadian revisionist plays critique cultural figures such as Philomela, Othello, and Pocahontas as reductive emblems of necessarily complex, layered racial, sexual, and gendered identities. Though this dissertation concentrates on Canadian literature, it also considers European sources (Ovid, Homer, Shakespeare) as well as theories of historiography (Filewod, Salter), speech acts (Austin, Butler), audience reception (Bennett), and publics (Habermas, Warner). My project ultimately outlines a set of twelve literary and dramatic strategies that are repeatedly used to challenge popular conceptions of what it means to be Black, Aboriginal, Canadian, queer, and female. ii Revisionist adaptation is a leading form of political protest in contemporary Canadian theatre. With attention to eight playwrights—Margaret Atwood, Margaret Clarke, Marc Lescarbot, Monique Mojica, Daniel David Moses, Djanet Sears, Erin Shields, and the collective group Optative Theatrical Laboratories (OTL)—this study examines the shared methodologies of late twentieth-century revisionist dramas.
  • Orisa-Shakespeare: a Study of Shakespeare Adaptations Inspired by the Yoruba Tradition

    Orisa-Shakespeare: a Study of Shakespeare Adaptations Inspired by the Yoruba Tradition

    Orisa-Shakespeare: A study of Shakespeare Adaptations Inspired by the Yoruba Tradition By Olalekan Is’haq Balogun (PhD with creative component) A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theatre Victoria University of Wellington (2017) Abstract This thesis combines creative practice with critical analysis to intervene in the field of post-colonial Shakespeare where, for over a generation, the process of adaptation has been presented as one of the main strategies by which Shakespeare’s ambiguous legacy in successor cultures can be both confronted and manipulated. Scholars often use the term “writing back” to designate a set of adaptations which challenge the cultural capital that Shakespeare privileges. By linking Yoruba spirituality in its political and cultural terms to the wider field of the relation between Africa, African writers and theatre makers and Shakespeare, the thesis proposes a new sub-field or genre of adaptations, “Orisa-Shakespeare,” rooted in Yoruba traditions. The thesis argues that, written in Nigeria and the Yoruba global diaspora, this set of adaptations are not necessarily challenging the Shakespeare canon but addressing their own societies, thus “writing forward.” The thesis examines the cultural and political significance of this bourgeoning body of adaptations of Shakespeare through the lens of Yoruba epistemology and its aesthetic principles. The thesis is broadly divided into two parts: an exegesis of selected adaptations of Shakespeare as case studies of post-colonial works that reflect and integrate Yoruba creative and performative idioms and translate them into dramaturgy; and an original play, Emi Caesar! in which core elements of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar are transplanted into the complex, violent world of Yoruba politics of the mid-19th century, as a parable for contemporary Nigeria politics where factionalism (specifically tribal/ethnic bigotry) works against the integrity and security of the society.
  • Othello's Testicles, Sybil's Womb: the Interracial Child in Harlem Duet and Its Progenitor

    Othello's Testicles, Sybil's Womb: the Interracial Child in Harlem Duet and Its Progenitor

    Othello’s Testicles, Sybil’s Womb: The Interracial Child in Harlem Duet and its Progenitor David Huebert University of Western Ontario hat is a penis without testicles? It is something severed, detached, Wincomplete—a hand without a thumb. It is unmistakably queer. I mean the word “queer” both in the quotidian sense offered by the oed—“strange, odd, peculiar, eccentric” (def. 1a)—and in the way Lee Edelman defines it: “queers—by which I mean all so stigmatized for failing to comply with heteronormative mandates—are not themselves also psychically invested in preserving the familiar familial narrativity of reproductive futurism” (No Future 17). The queer subject, in this line of thinking, is that which does not conform to the heterocentric injunction to procreate. The penis, thought without the testicles, likewise stands apart from the symbolic landscape of reproduction. Like Edelman’s “future-negating queer,” the unhinged penis exists outside the order of “pro-procreative ideology” (No Future 26, 12). The testicles themselves, unlike their isolated counterpart, are the primordial locus of futurity. The testicles in this sense have more in common with womb than penis. This article will examine testicles and wombs and, more specifically, the forms of futurity lurking within them, in Djanet Sears’s 1997 play Harlem Duet and its primary progenitor, Wil- liam Shakespeare’s Othello. While Edelman is concerned with a “figural Child” who “affirms the absolute logic of reproduction itself” and “seems ESC 41.4 (December 2015): 23–50 to shimmer with the iridescent promise of Noah’s rainbow” (No Future 11, 18), I want to consider the representative of a different kind of future: the interracial child.
  • Jerry Wasserman

    Jerry Wasserman

    Jerry Wasserman Whose Blues? AfriCanadian Theatre and the Blues Aesthetic This essay explores some of the ways by which blues and a Canadian blues aesthetic are manifested in four African-Canadian plays. I’m particularly interested in the ways black Canadian play - wrights appropriate, translate, and reconstruct African-American blues materials to create what George Elliott Clarke calls“an intra- racial post-coloniality.” I argue that Clarke’s Whylah Falls: The Play , George Boyd’s Gideon’s Blues , Djanet Sears’s Harlem Duet , and Andrew Moodie’s The Lady Smith theatrically conjure a dias - poric AfriCanadian poly-consciousness that acknowledges its inextricable American connections at the same time as the plays use blues music and sensibility to chart and construct a distinc - tively Canadian experience. Signifying on African-American musical, theatrical, historical, and literary intertexts, African- Canadian theatre artists create, in ahdri zhina mandiela’s words,“a homegrown africanadian aesthetics.” Cette contribution examine comment le blues et une esthétique canadienne du blues se manifestent dans quatre pièces afro-cana - diennes. Wasserman s’intéresse tout particulièrement à la façon dont les dramaturges canadiens de race noire s’approprient, traduisent et reconstruisent le matériel tiré du blues afro-américain pour créer ce que George Elliott Clark a appelé « la post-colonialité intra-raciale ». Wasserman fait valoir que les pièces Whylah Falls: The Play de Clarke, Gideon’s Blues de George Boyd, Harlem Duet de Djanet Sears et The Lady Smith d’Andrew Moodie évoquent, sur scène, une conscience afro-canadienne à plusieurs facettes qui reconnaît ses liens inextricables à l’Amérique tout en utilisant le blues et les sensi - bilités qui y sont liées pour tracer et construire une expérience qui est clairement canadienne.
  • The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 3/4/20, 4(56 PM

    The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 3/4/20, 4(56 PM

    Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 3/4/20, 4(56 PM ISSN 1554-6985 VOLUME VIII · (/current) NUMBER 1 SPRING/SUMMER 2013 (/previous) EDITED BY (/about) Christy Desmet and Sujata (/archive) Iyengar CONTENTS "'Late' has no meaning here": Imagining a Second Chance in Peter Toni Morrison's Desdemona (/710/show) (pdf) (/710/pdf) Erickson This Tempest's Hers: Metropolitan Opera's The Enchanted Amy Island and the Feminism of Bel Canto Shakespeare Adaptation Scott- (/703/show) (pdf) (/703/pdf) Douglass Representations of Shakespeare's Humanity and Iconicity: Sarah Incidental Appropriations in Four British Television Broadcasts Olive (/783384/show) (pdf) (/783384/pdf) A CTRESSES, ARTISTS, AUTHORS: WOMEN S HAKESPEAREANS IN THE NINETEENTH C ENTURY E DITED BY CHRISTY DESMET AND SUJATA I YENGAR Christy Introduction (/709/show) (pdf) (/709/pdf) Desmet http://borrowers.uga.edu/25/toc Page 1 of 2 Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 3/4/20, 4(56 PM Sarah Bernhardt's Ophelia (/662/show) (pdf) (/662/pdf) Alan Young "Playing the Men": Ellen Tree, Fanny Kemble, and Theatrical Anne Constructions of Gender (/712/show) (pdf) (/712/pdf) Russell Judith Joanna Baillie and the Anxiety of Shakespeare's Influence Bailey (/690/show) (pdf) (/690/pdf) Slagle Shakespeare, King of What? Gender, Nineteenth-Century Tricia Patriotism, and the Case of Poet-lore (/707/show) (pdf) Lootens (/707/pdf) B OOK REVIEW Bettymania and the Birth of Celebrity Culture, by Jeffrey Celestine Kahan (/635/show) (pdf) (/635/pdf)
  • Duets, Duologues, and Black Diasporic Theatre: Djanet Sears

    Duets, Duologues, and Black Diasporic Theatre: Djanet Sears

    Djanet Sears's Harlem Duet and Black Diasporic Theatre 189 Duets, Duologues, and Black Diasporic discursively, in much postcolonial drama, to "unfix [the] colonial authority" (16) signified by Shakespeare, 2 in this paper I want to examine how Sears's Theatre : DJanet Sears, William equally metatheatrical Harlem Duet simultaneously displaces - or exorcises - Shakespeare's Othello and re-places that text with/in a chorus of other(ed) Shakespeare, and Others' literary voices. I undertake this examination in two stages : first, after outlining the complex plot and dramatic structure of the play, I sketch very briefly some PETER DICKINSON specific North American comparative frameworks and cultural contexts in which Harlem Duet might be productively situated ; next, I explore more closely the play's dialogues with both the theatre and the theory of a broader Black diaspora . Here, my remarks centre on what I see - as Sears's explicit engagement with two previous postcolonial revisions of Shakespeare - Aime Cesaire's Une tempete (1969) and Murray Carlin's Not Now, Sweet Desde- mona (1969) - especially as each of those plays, in turn, engages with the work of Frantz Fanon and other theorists of the colonial condition . I am par- ticularly interested in showing how Harlem Duet further revises the discus- In "Notes of a Coloured Girl," the Foreword to her Governor-General's- sions of racial identity in all of these texts, by documenting its cultural and Award-winning, 1997 play, Harlem Duet, African-Canadian playwright historical imbricatedness with gender identity . In this regard, it is important to Djanet Sears traces a literary and cultural genealogy of her apprenticeship take note of the extent to which Sears, as an anticolonial feminist playwright, in the theatre : as reader, writer, actor, director, and audience member .
  • Othello Ongoing: Feminist and Postcolonial Adaptations

    Othello Ongoing: Feminist and Postcolonial Adaptations

    ISSN 1923-1555[Print] Studies in Literature and Language ISSN 1923-1563[Online] Vol. 13, No. 6, 2016, pp. 42-47 www.cscanada.net DOI:10.3968/9094 www.cscanada.org Othello Ongoing: Feminist and Postcolonial Adaptations Shireen Hikmat Alkurdi[a],*; Hanan Al-Jezawi[b] [a]Instructor, Humanities Department, Al-Balqa’ Applied University, Amman, Jordan. INTRODUCTION [b]Instructor, English Department, Al-Balqa’ Applied University, Amman, Shakespeare was one of the most influential adapters Jordan. who used to adapt existing works and make them new. *Corresponding author. Though Shakespeare himself was a borrower, copying Received 5 December 2016; accepted 15 December 2016 plots, characters and images, borrowing was a common Published online 26 December 2016 practice among dramatists in the Renaissance; it was not an illegal act. He was a master in imitating classical works Abstract and re-visioning them. In fact, Shakespeare’s works have As long as Shakespeare’s great plays are there, there have been developed to suit the new cultures and to express been varied and ongoing adaptations of his works. This different viewpoints. His original works have been long history of appropriation of the Bard’s works reflects adapted; his language has been changed and replaced; and different cultures and movements throughout time. This sometimes the adaptation is very close to his language. research aims to study two adaptations of Shakespeare’s Each new form expresses a new point of view to represent Othello in the twentieth century, trying to illustrate a feminist, materialist, postcolonial, or even a queer how Shakespeare’s Othello has been adapted to suit the perspective.
  • Djanet Sears

    Djanet Sears

    Djanet Sears I grew up in a society where I was considered a minority, minor, inferior, and somewhere along the line, I developed a type of internal- ized oppression. Although the ways in which each of us experiences internalized oppres- sion are unique, no black person in this soci- ety has been spared. ‘Internalized racism’ has “been the primary means by which we have been forced to perpetuate and ‘agree’ to our own oppression. — from the Afterward in Afrika Solo Quick Facts * Born in 1959 Biography * Caribbean- Canadian play- Djanet Sears was born Janet Sears in London, England to parents” of wright, director, Caribbean descent - her mother is Jamaican, and her father is Guyanese. and editor She lived in England until 1974, when her family moved from Lon- * Author of don to Saskatoon, Saskatchewan in Canada. Her family then moved to Afrika Solo Oakville, Ontario in 1975, and Djanet remained there until 1977. She then moved to Toronto, Ontario to attend York University and there re- (1990) ceived an Honours Bachelor of Fine Arts in Theatre. She has also studied at the Canadian Film Centre and New York University in New York. As an adult, she traveled to West Africa, where she came across a plateau area called Djanet. It was this that inspired her to change her name to Djanet and embrace her African ancestry. She is currently working as an adjunct professor at the University of Toronto, and has recently been This page was researched and involved as a Writer-in-Residence at the University of Guelph. submitted by Annie Swerkstrom, Joelle Nelson, and Shelley Prieditis on 12/16/04.