Sustainable Prosperity in the New Economy?: Business Organization and High-Tech Employment in the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainable Prosperity in the New Economy?: Business Organization and High-Tech Employment in the United States Upjohn Press Upjohn Research home page 9-30-2009 Sustainable Prosperity in the New Economy?: Business Organization and High-Tech Employment in the United States William Lazonick University of Massachusetts, Lowell Follow this and additional works at: https://research.upjohn.org/up_press Part of the Labor Economics Commons Citation Lazonick, William. 2009. Sustainable Prosperity in the New Economy?: Business Organization and High- Tech Employment in the United States. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/9781441639851 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. This title is brought to you by the Upjohn Institute. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sustainable Prosperity in the New Economy? Lazonick.indb 1 7/31/2009 8:42:03 AM Lazonick.indb 2 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM Sustainable Prosperity in the New Economy? Business Organization and High-Tech Employment in the United States William Lazonick 2009 W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Kalamazoo, Michigan Lazonick.indb 3 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lazonick, William Sustainable prosperity in the new economy : business organization and high-tech employment in the United States / William Lazonick. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-88099-350-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-88099-350-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-88099-351-7 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-88099-351-0 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Information technology—Economic aspects—United States. 2. High-technology industries—United States. 3. Labor market—United States. 4. Economic development—United States. I. Title. HC110.I55L39 2009 330.973—dc22 2009023117 © 2009 W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research 300 S. Westnedge Avenue Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007-4686 The facts presented in this study and the observations and viewpoints expressed are the sole responsibility of the author. They do not necessarily represent positions of the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. Cover design by Ace Creative Index prepared by Printed in the United States of America. Printed on recycled paper. Lazonick.indb 4 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM To the memory of my parents, Louis and Pearl Lazonick. Lazonick.indb 5 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM Lazonick.indb 6 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM Contents Preface xiii 1 What is New, and Permanent, about the “New Economy”? 1 The End of “The Organization Man” 1 Innovation and Growth in the U.S. Economy 7 ICT Industries 16 The Top 20 Old Economy and New Economy Companies 26 NEBM as a Force for Unstable and Inequitable Economic Growth 33 2 The Rise of the New Economy Business Model 39 Origins of the Microelectronics Revolution 39 Evolution of the NEBM 42 3 The Demise of the Old Economy Business Model 81 Old Economy Employment Relations in the 1980s 81 The Destruction of “Lifelong” Employment at IBM 83 The End of “The HP Way” 89 Lucent’s Failed Transition to NEBM 98 Success and Failure in the Transition to NEBM 110 4 Pensions and Unions in the New Economy 115 Security through Seniority 115 The Transformation of Pensions in ICT 117 IBM 121 Unions 128 The Absence of Unions in NEBM 144 5 Globalization of the High-Tech Labor Force 149 Offshoring 149 Education and Growth in Asia 151 Brain Drain 156 The Historical Role of U.S. FDI in Stemming the Asian 162 Brain Drain South Korea’s Reversal of the Brain Drain 166 Malaysia’s FDI-Driven Development 176 Evolution of IT Services in India 178 Indigenous Innovation in China 182 Global Labor Flows and National Economic Development 190 vii Lazonick.indb 7 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM 6 The Quest for Shareholder Value 197 NEBM and the Stock Market 197 Maximizing Shareholder Value 200 A Critique of the Shareholder-Value Perspective 203 The Five Functions of the Stock Market and Innovative Enterprise 215 Why Do Companies Repurchase Their Own Stock? 241 7 Prospects for Sustainable Prosperity 249 “Market Forces” Are Not Natural Phenomena 249 The Limited Role of the Stock Market in the Old Economy 252 The Stock Market in NEBM: From Innovation to Speculation 255 to Manipulation The Rise of Economic Insecurity 258 The Problem of Minority Education and Employment 269 Corporate Governance for Sustainable Prosperity 273 References 277 The Author 325 Index ? About the Institute ? viii Lazonick.indb 8 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM Figures 1.1 U.S. Unemployment Rates, Percent of the Relevant Labor Force, 11 1947–2007 1.2 Gini Coeffi cient for All U.S. Families, 1947–2007 14 1.3 Changes in the Relative Incomes of Selected Income Percentiles 15 in the U.S. Distribution of Income, 1967–2007 1.4 Shares of the Top Income Earners of the Total U.S. Income, 16 1913–2002 1.5 Employment in Four ICT Industrial Classifi cations, 1994–2006 19 1.6 Real Wages (in 2000 dollars) in Four ICT Industrial Classifi cations, 20 1994–2006 2.1 Three Waves of Silicon Valley Semiconductor Start-Ups, 43 1955–1985 2.2 Objectives of Ongoing Stock-Option Programs, ICT Companies 53 Operating in the United States, 1996–2003 2.3 Full-Time Employees in the Semiconductor Industry, Silicon 57 Valley, Route 128, Dallas, and Oregon, 1994–2006 2.4 Full-Time Employees in Software Publishing, Silicon Valley, 58 Route 128, Dallas, and Washington State, 1994–2006 2.5 Real Wages (in 2000 dollars) in the Semiconductor Industry, 59 United States, Silicon Valley, Route 128, Dallas, and Oregon, 1994–2006 2.6 Real Wages (in 2000 dollars) in Software Publishing, United 60 States, Silicon Valley, Route 128, Dallas, and Washington State, 1994–2006 2.7 Coevolution of Venture Capital Entrants and Semiconductor 70 Start-Ups in Silicon Valley, 1957–1983 6.1 Net Corporate Equity Issues (billions of 2007 dollars) in the 206 United States by Nonfi nancial Corporate Business and by Selected Financial Sectors, 1980–2007 6.2 Ratios of Cash Dividends and Stock Repurchases to Net Income 232 and Mean Dividend Payments and Stock Repurchases among the S&P 500, 1997–2007 7.1 DJIA, S&P 500, and NASDAQ Composite Indices, July 1986– 257 October 2008 (monthly data) ix Lazonick.indb 9 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM 7.2 Stock-Price Movements for (Panel A) Cisco Systems (March 259 1990–October 2008) and Intel and Microsoft (July 1986–October 2008) and for (Panel B) Intel and Microsoft (July 1986–October 2008) Tables 1.1 Real GDP per Capita in Selected Nations Compared with the 8 United States, 1950–2006 1.2 Average Annual U.S. Corporate Stock and Bond Yields (%), 13 1960–2007 1.3 Old Economy Business Model (OEBM) and New Economy 17 Business Model (NEBM) in ICT Industries 1.4 U.S. Exports and Imports of ICT Products, Relative to All 21 Advanced Technology Products (ATP), 2002–2007 1.5 U.S. ICT Companies among the Global Top 100 R&D Spenders, 22 2004 and 2005 1.6 Employment, 1996 and 2000–2005, at the Top 20 Old Economy 28 Companies by 2005 Sales 1.7 Employment, 1996 and 2000–2005, at the Top 20 New Economy 30 Companies by 2005 Sales 2.1 Stock Options Outstanding as a Percent of Common Stock 55 Outstanding, Selected U.S. ICT Companies, 2000–2007 2.2 Average Gains (thousand U.S. dollars) per Top 5 Executive from 62 the Exercise of Stock Options, Selected U.S. ICT Companies, 1995–2007 2.3 Average Gains (in U.S. dollars) per Employee (excluding the top 5) 64 from the Exercise of Stock Options, Selected U.S. ICT Companies, 1995–2007 2.4 Ratios of Average Top 5 Gains from the Exercise of Stock Options 65 to Average Gains of Other Employees, Selected U.S. ICT Companies, 1995–2007 4.1 U.S. Pension Plans in 2005 of the Top 20 New Economy 118 Companies by Sales 4.2 Retirement Plans in 1985 and 2005–2006 of the Top 20 Old 122 Economy ICT Companies by Sales in 2005 4.3 Union Membership in the Top 20 Old Economy ICT Companies, 129 2005 x Lazonick.indb 10 7/31/2009 8:42:35 AM 5.1 Doctoral Degrees Awarded per 100,000 Population, Aged 25–34, 155 Most Recent Available Year, for Selected Asian Countries and the United States 5.2 Highest Levels of Educational Attainment, Percentage of the 183 Population 25 Years Old and Over, China and India, 1980 and 2000 6.1 Top 50 Repurchasers of Stock, 2000–2007, among Corporations 234 in the S&P 500 Index in January 2008 6.2 Payout Ratios and R&D Intensity Compared with Repurchases 237 Intensity for the Top 50 Repurchasers of Stock, 2000–2007, among Corporations in the S&P 500 Index in January 2008 xi Lazonick.indb 11 7/31/2009 8:42:36 AM Lazonick.indb 12 7/31/2009 8:42:36 AM Preface As I write this preface in March 2009, the United States is in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. The Obama administra- tion has established a massive stimulus package to get the economy back on track. As I show in this book, however, there are fundamental problems with the U.S. economy that predate the current crisis. Even in recovery, the U.S. economy will not generate stable and equitable growth—or what I call “sus- tainable prosperity”—unless these problems are fi xed. For the past three decades the distribution of income in the United States has become more unequal, with a hugely, and some might say grotesquely, disproportionate share of total national income now going to the very richest households.
Recommended publications
  • The Struggle to Redevelop a Jim Crow State, 1960–2000
    Educating for a New Economy: The Struggle to Redevelop a Jim Crow State, 1960–2000 by William D. Goldsmith Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Nancy MacLean, Supervisor ___________________________ Edward J. Balleisen ___________________________ Adriane Lentz-Smith ___________________________ Gary Gereffi ___________________________ Helen Ladd Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in The Graduate School of Duke University 2018 ABSTRACT Educating for a New Economy: The Struggle to Redevelop a Jim Crow State, 1960–2000 by William D. Goldsmith Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Nancy MacLean, Supervisor ___________________________ Edward J. Balleisen ___________________________ Adriane Lentz-Smith ___________________________ Gary Gereffi ___________________________ Helen Ladd An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 Copyright by William D. Goldsmith 2018 Abstract This dissertation shows how an array of policymakers, invested in uprooting an unequal political economy descended from the plantation system and Jim Crow, gravitated to education as a centerpiece of development strategy, and why so many are still disappointed in its outcomes. By looking at state-wide policymaking in North Carolina and policy effects in the state’s black belt counties, this study shows why the civil rights movement was vital for shifting state policy in former Jim Crow states towards greater investment in human resources. By breaking down employment barriers to African Americans and opening up the South to new people and ideas, the civil rights movement fostered a new climate for economic policymaking, and a new ecosystem of organizations flourished to promote equitable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Talent, Immigration, and U.S. Economic Competitiveness
    Talent, Immigration, and U.S. Economic Competitiveness GORDON H. HANSON & MATTHEW J. SLAUGHTER | MAY 2013 Table of Contents About The Authors 1 Executive Summary 2 SECTION 1 The Contribution of Talent to American Innovation and Overall Competitiveness 4 SECTION 2 Immigration’s Contribution to U S Talent: Strong Past and Growing Importance Today 13 SECTION 3 Supply and Demand of STEM Talent in America: Immigrants Continue to Help Meet Growing Demand 23 SECTION 4 Conclusions 36 References 37 About the Authors Gordon H. Hanson is the Pacific Economic Cooperation Chair in International Economic Relations at UC San Diego (UCSD), where he is director of the Center on Emerging and Pacific Economies and founding co-director of the Policy Design and Evaluation Lab. At UCSD, he has faculty positions in the School of International Relations and Pacific Studies and the Depart- ment of Economics. Professor Hanson is also a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Matthew J. Slaughter is Associate Dean for Faculty and Signal Companies’ Professor of Management at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. He is also a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, an adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, and a member of the Congressional Budget Office’s Panel of Economic Advisers. From 2005 to 2007, he served as a Member of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers. This report was sponsored and published by Compete America Coalition. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors. © 2013 Gordon H. Hanson and Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • NAME: LOUIS A. FERLEGER Address: Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Road Boston, MA 02215 (617) 353-8305 Emai
    NAME: LOUIS A. FERLEGER Address: Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Road Boston, MA 02215 (617) 353-8305 Email: [email protected] Education: Temple University (B.B.A., 1971) Temple University (MA, Economics, 1973) Temple University (Ph.D., Economics, 1978) Teaching and Professional Employment: Professor, Department of History, Boston University, 1999-present. Executive Director, The Historical Society, 1999-2008. Associate Director, Honors Program, University of Massachusetts Boston, 1997-99. Adjunct Professor, Department of History, Boston College, Spring 1997. Associate Director, Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research, 1994-97. Chair, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 1992-93. Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 1991-1999. Associate Dean of Academic Affairs, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 1989-1991. Associate Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 1984-1991. Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 1978-84. Academic Honors: Honored for Excellence in Teaching, University of Massachusetts Boston, March 1988. Outstanding Achievement Award, University of Massachusetts Boston, 1984-85. Grants and Fellowships: National Endowment for the Humanities Chairman’s Grant, 2008 Earhart Foundation Fellowship, 2005-06 1 Research Grant, Twentieth Century Fund, jointly with Jay Mandle, Spring, 1992 Charles Warren Fellowship, Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History, Department of History, Harvard University, Spring 1992. Arthur H. Cole Grant-in-Aid, Economic History Association, Summer 1988. National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship, 1988. Research Grant, Joseph P. Healey Endowment Grant, University of Massachusetts Boston, Spring, 1986. Research Grant, American Association for State and Local History, 1985. Faculty Development Research and Travel Grants, University of Massachusetts Boston: 1979, 1981, 1982-1984, 1996-98.
    [Show full text]
  • JOI Volume 5 Issue 2 Cover and Front Matter
    17441374_5-2.qxd 6/25/09 4:00 PM Page 1 Journal of ISSN 1744-1374 Economics Institutional of Journal Institutional Journal of Economics vol 5 • no 2 • AUGUST 2009 Institutional Economics Contents 137 Knowledge and the theory of institutional change vol 5 • no 2 • AUGUST 2009 Thráinn Eggertsson 151 Comparing theories of institutional change Chris Kingston and Gonzalo Caballero 181 Institutions and US regional development: a study of Massachusetts and Virginia Sukkoo Kim 207 Does institutional quality affect capital mobility? Evidence from developing countries Javed Younas 225 Comparative urban institutions and intertemporal externality: a revisit of the 5 • no 2 AUGUSTvol 2009 Coase conjecture Feng Deng Fragment 251 Self-deceit and self-serving bias: Adam Smith on ‘General Rules’ Elias L. Khalil Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: journals.cambridge.org/joi Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.76, on 28 Sep 2021 at 20:26:04, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137409001258 17441374_5-2.qxd 6/25/09 4:00 PM Page 2 Journal of Institutional Economics Journal of Institutional Economics editors statement of aims submission of articles subscriptions copying issn Institutions are the stuff of social and institutions and organizations. The Journal of Institutional Economics ( Geoffrey M. Hodgson (Editor-in-Chief) Submission should be made electronically to This journal is registered with the Copyright economic life. The importance of The Journal of Institutional Economics is an 1744-1374) is published three times a year, The Business School the Editor-in-Chief, Geoffrey Hodgson, via Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, understanding the role of institutions in interdisciplinary journal that will be of interest April, August and December.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diamond of Psi Upsilon June 1928
    W^^www^ @ �l^lt] [*) l^^^iW^W^W^ DIAMOND f^ . of . ^ Psi Upsilcsn �a? June 1928 Volume XIV Number Four i Ti?'zi?'ii?'^^^^l [f] IT] [T] ? BIjEII^ |Ny%^^ii<>'-tifW THE DIAMOND OF PSI UPSILON Official Publication of Psi Upsilon Fraternity Published in November, January, March and June, by The Diamond of Psi Upsilon, a corporation not for pecuniary profit, organized under the laws of Illinois An Open Forum for the Free Discussion of Fraternity Matters Volume XIV JUNE, 1928 Numbee 4 BOARD OP EDITORS Mask Bowman ....... Delta Delta '20 R. BouRKE Corcoran Omega '15 Ralph C. Guenther Tau'26 Kenneth Laied Omega '25 George W. Ross, Jb Phi '26 ALUMNI ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE DIAMOND Henet Johnson Fisher Beta '96 Herbert S. Houston Omega '88 Edward Hungeefoed Pi '99 Julian S. Mason . .... Beta '98 EXECUTIVE COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON THE DIAMOND Walter T. Collins Iota '03 R. BouRKE Corcoran Omega '15 Herbert S. Houston Omega '88 LIFE SUBSCRIPTION TEN DOLLARS ONE DOLLAR THE YEAR BY SUBSCRIPTION SINGLE COPIES FIFTY CENTS MdresB all communications to the Board of Editors, Room 500, 30 N. Dearborn St., TABLE of CONTENTS The 1928 Convention 209 Notes of the Convention 211 The Alumni Conference 212 The Convention Banquet 216 A Scholarship Prize of $500 230 Delta Chapter Life Subsceibers 232 Chapter Scholaeship Recoeds 233 Omiceon Alumni of Unknown Address 238 Expulsion Notice 238 In Memoeiam 239 Edwaed a. Bradford, Beta '73 Jay Feank Chappell, Omega '20 Eael W. DeMoe, Rho '92 Chauncey M. Depew, Beta '56 Rev. Edw. C. Feillowes> Beta '88 Colonel Moses M.
    [Show full text]
  • State Failure in Developing Countries and Strategies of Institutional Reform
    State Failure in Developing Countries and Strategies of Institutional Reform Mushtaq H. Khan Department of Economics, SOAS, University of London. Abstract: The analysis of state failure and the policy debate have been driven by two very different underlying views of what the state does. The first, which we call the “service- delivery” view says the role of the state is to provide law and order, stable property rights, key public goods and welfarist redistributions. In failing to provide these, state failure contributes to economic under-performance and poverty. State failure of this type is in turn related to an inter-dependent constellation of governance failures including corruption and rent-seeking, distortions in markets and the absence of democracy. All of these need to be addressed to focus the state on its core service-delivery tasks. The second locates the developing country state in the context of “social transformation”: the dramatic transition these countries are going through as traditional production systems collapse and a capitalist economy begins to emerge. Dynamic transformation states have heavily intervened in property rights and devised rent-management systems to accelerate the capitalist transition and the acquisition of new technologies. State failure according to this view has been driven by the lack of institutional capacities in these respects, and more importantly, the incompatibility of institutional capacities with pre-existing distributions of power. An examination of the econometric data and historical evidence raises serious doubts as to whether the governance reforms suggested by the first view can improve growth, while the need for reforms identified by the second view are much better supported.
    [Show full text]
  • November 06, 2020 BSE Limited Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers Dalal
    November 06, 2020 BSE Limited National Stock Exchange of India Limited Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers The Exchange Plaza Dalal Street Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra Mumbai 400001 (East) Mumbai 400051 Scrip code: 541770 Scrip code: CREDITACC Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Press Release –Q2 FY21 Results Pursuant to Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 and with reference to the above subject, we hereby submit the enclosed press release for your kind information and records. Thanking you, Yours sincerely, For CreditAccess Grameen Limited M J Mahadev Prakash Head - Compliance, Legal & Company Secretary Membership No: A16350 CreditAccess Grameen Limited – Second Quarter FY20-21 Results Gross Loan Portfolio up 41.5% YoY to INR 11,183 crore Borrower Base up 47.0% YoY to 38.8 lakh borrowers PPOP up 26.9% YoY to INR 197 crore Consolidated PAT of INR 80 crore Bengaluru, 6th November 2020: CreditAccess Grameen Limited (NSE: CREDITACC, BSE: 541770, ‘CAGL’), country’s leading microfinance institution, today announced its unaudited and limited reviewed financial performance for the second quarter and first half of financial year ending March 31,2021. Consolidated Highlights Q2 FY21: • Gross loan portfolio grew by 41.5% YoY from INR 7,905 crore to INR 11,183 crore • Borrowers grew by 47.0% YoY from 26.4 lakh to 38.8 lakh • NII grew by 31.6% YoY from INR 251.4 crore to INR 330.9 crore • PPOP grew by 26.9% YoY from INR 155.1 crore to INR 196.9 crore • Total ECL provisions were INR 561.9 crore (5.17% of loan portfolio).
    [Show full text]
  • Wxw Holds Keynote on Wxw NOW Streaming
    wXw holds keynote on wXw NOW streaming service, announces details on Germany's first wrestling network wXw just announced the first in-depth details on our new "wXw NOW" streaming network, which will launch one month from now on 8/13 at www.wxwnow.de. It will not just be a collection of shows like a lot of companies offer for a monthly fee via Pivotshare but also offer original content and a lot of archived shows, some dating back as far as 2006. We will also have our uniquely designed interface/UI, while hosting and infrastructure will be managed by Vimeo, our long-time streaming partner, dating back to 2013. Wrestling journalist Markus Gronemann (DarkMat.eu, Wrestling Observer) considers this to be the biggest launch of an over-the-top pro wrestling channel by a single promotion since New Japan World. wXw Managing Director Christian Jakobi held a keynote presentation tonight at 8 pm CEST at the wXw Wrestling Academy training school, which was streamed live on Facebook (the video is available, albeit only in German, here) and talked about what future and past events and what kind of original content would be available. We had up to 750 viewers simultaneously on Facebook and also had some students and a trainer (Toby Blunt) in attendance to provide some crowd noise and cheering at key points during the announcement. Marquee Events are wXw's version of pay-per-view caliber shows, where feuds start and end and international talent often appears. There currently are 10 marquee events on the calendar, with some of them being multi-day shows:
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge to Permanent Immigration Or Temporary Labor? the H-1B Visa Program Is a Source of Both Ron Hira, Howard University
    Bridge to Permanent Immigration or Temporary Labor? The H-1B Visa Program Is A Source of Both Ron Hira, Howard University Introduction Many members of the popular press, pundits, business and university leaders, and policy makers conflate and often confuse guest worker visas, such as the H-1B, with permanent immigration.11 Carly Fiorina, an advisor to John McCain’s presidential campaign in 2008 and former CEO of Hewlett-Packard, responded to a question about H-1Bs during the campaign this way, “It is in our economic interest to have really smart people wanting to come here. And so what's wrong with the H-1B visa system today, among other things, is that we curtail that program so tightly that the limits that Congress allows for H-1B visa entrance are usually filled within one week. So we have to find a more practical system for allowing smart, hard-working people to come into this country and it should be our goal to get them to stay here forever” (Bomey 2008). Reading the quote, one might expect that expanding the H-1B program is the critical change to immigration policy that is needed in order to keep skilled workers here permanently. While permanent residence allows foreign nationals to live and work in the United States permanently, guest worker visas like an H-1B allow them to live and work in the United States only temporarily (not “forever”) and under circumstances that restrict their ability to stay in the country if they don’t keep their position. These circumstances sometimes put guest workers in a precarious position that invites their exploitation, creates insecurity for them, and undermines the integrity of the labor market.
    [Show full text]
  • H-1B Visa Season Is Here the U.S
    Business Week Top News March 31, 2009, 12:01AM EST H-1B Visa Season Is Here The U.S. government begins accepting applications on Apr. 1, and all 85,000 H-1B visas available are expected to be used By Moira Herbst On Apr. 1, the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service (USCIS) will begin accepting applications for H-1B visas for skilled workers. The number of applications will reveal U.S. employers' current appetite for overseas workers. Because of the recession, the overall volume of applications is expected to be down from the previous two years, in which the offices were instantly flooded with applications from tech companies, outsourcing firms, school districts, and a variety of other employers. Still, it's widely believed that the 85,000 visas available under the cap will be used before the fiscal year begins on Oct. 1. That's because there is some pent-up demand from 2008 applicants who didn't receive visas, and because employers say there are positions they can't fill with U.S. labor, even as unemployment rises. "It's fair to say that American companies are likely to file for fewer visas [in 2009]," Robert Hoffman, a vice-president at Oracle (ORCL) and spokesman for Compete America, a lobbying group advocating for more avenues for skilled immigration, said in a Mar. 31 conference call. "Still, all the [85,000] visas will be needed. If we're going to get out of the recession, we're going to have to innovate our way out…Continued use of the H-1B visa program is critically important." U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Readingsample
    Springer Series in Materials Science 106 Into The Nano Era Moore's Law Beyond Planar Silicon CMOS Bearbeitet von Howard Huff 1. Auflage 2008. Buch. xxviii, 348 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 540 74558 7 Format (B x L): 15,5 x 23,5 cm Gewicht: 725 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Technik > Elektronik > Mikroprozessoren Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. 2 The Economic Implications of Moore’s Law G.D. Hutcheson 2.1 Introduction One hundred nanometers is a fundamental technology landmark. It is the demarca- tion point between microtechnology and nanotechnology. The semiconductor indus- try crossed it just after the second millennium had finished. In less than 50 years, it had come from transistors made in mils (one-thousandth of an inch or 25.4 mi- crons); to integrated circuits which were popularized as microchips; and then as the third millennium dawned, nanochips. At this writing, nanochips are the largest single sector of nanotechnology. This, in spite of many a nanotechnology expert’s predic- tion that semiconductors would be dispatched to the dustbin of science – where tubes and core memory lie long dead. Classical nanotechnologists should not feel any dis- grace, as pundits making bad predictions about the end of technology progression go back to the 1960s. Indeed, even Gordon Moore wondered as he wrote his clas- sic paper in 1965 if his observation would hold into the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • The HP Garage—The Birthplace of Silicon Valley 367 Addison Avenue, Palo Alto, California
    Brochure A home for innovation The HP Garage—the Birthplace of Silicon Valley 367 Addison Avenue, Palo Alto, California HP Corporate Archives Brochure A home for innovation Tucked away on a quiet, tree-lined residential street near Stanford University, the HP Garage stands today as the enduring symbol of innovation and the entrepreneurial spirit. It was in this humble 12x18-foot building that college friends Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard first pursued the dream of a company of their own. Guided by an unwavering desire to develop innovative and useful products, the two men went on to blaze a trail at the forefront of the electronics revolution. The history of the HP Garage The HP Garage in 1939 (top) and The garage stands behind a two-story Shingle restored in 2005 (bottom). Style home built for Dr. John C. Spencer about 1905. The exact construction date of the garage is unknown, but while there is no evidence of its presence on insurance maps dated 1908, by 1924 it is clearly denoted on updated documents as a private garage. In 1938, Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard decided to “make a run for it” in business. Dave left his job at General Electric in Schenectady, New York, and returned to Palo Alto while Bill scouted rentals. The garage was dedicated as the Birthplace of Silicon Valley in 1989, and HP acquired the He found one perfect for their needs on Addison property in 2000. HP is proud to have worked Avenue. Chosen specifically because of a garage closely with the City of Palo Alto to return the he and Dave could use as their workshop, the house, garage, and shed to conditions much property also offered a three-room, ground- as they were in 1939.
    [Show full text]