USA Volleyball Indoor Casebook – February 2021 (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Disability Classification System
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso. -
The Use of Next Generation Sequencing to Study the Environmental Mycobiome and Its Potential Health Effects
The use of next generation sequencing to study the environmental mycobiome and its potential health effects Emma Marczylo Bioaerosols – June 2017 Overview • Brief Background: • Why are CRCE interested in fungal bioaerosols? • Mycobiome analysis: • Why use next generation sequencing? • Ongoing work • What is the current focus of CRCE’s bioaerosol research? 2 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Why bioaerosols? • Respiratory health/toxicology a big focus within our department & bioaerosols represent a current respiratory health concern 3 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Why bioaerosols? • Common sources relevant to public health 4 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Why bioaerosols? • Public concern over health effects of living near composting and intensive farming sites • Systematic reviews on exposures and health outcomes related to bioaerosol emissions from composting facilities (published 2015*) or intensive farming (ongoing) in collaboration with SAHSU • Evidence on both exposure assessment and health effects are limited • A big unknown is the microbial composition of such bioaerosols *Pearson et al, 2015, J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev,18:43-69 5 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Why fungi? Normally die rapidly due to water evaporation, although increased humidity and clumping can prolong survival • Can remain viable for much longer periods, even at low humidity & high/low temperatures • Much less known about the fungal composition of bioaerosols (and other samples) • Fungi linked with development and exacerbation of asthma symptoms 6 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Mycobiome -
Framework for In-Field Analyses of Performance and Sub-Technique Selection in Standing Para Cross-Country Skiers
sensors Article Framework for In-Field Analyses of Performance and Sub-Technique Selection in Standing Para Cross-Country Skiers Camilla H. Carlsen 1,*, Julia Kathrin Baumgart 1, Jan Kocbach 1,2, Pål Haugnes 1 , Evy M. B. Paulussen 1,3 and Øyvind Sandbakk 1 1 Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] (J.K.B.); [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (E.M.B.P.); [email protected] (Ø.S.) 2 NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, 5008 Bergen, Norway 3 Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-452-40-788 Abstract: Our aims were to evaluate the feasibility of a framework based on micro-sensor technology for in-field analyses of performance and sub-technique selection in Para cross-country (XC) skiing by using it to compare these parameters between elite standing Para (two men; one woman) and able- bodied (AB) (three men; four women) XC skiers during a classical skiing race. The data from a global navigation satellite system and inertial measurement unit were integrated to compare time loss and selected sub-techniques as a function of speed. Compared to male/female AB skiers, male/female Para skiers displayed 19/14% slower average speed with the largest time loss (65 ± 36/35 ± 6 s/lap) Citation: Carlsen, C.H.; Kathrin found in uphill terrain. -
Field Indicators of Hydric Soils
United States Department of Field Indicators of Agriculture Natural Resources Hydric Soils in the Conservation Service United States In cooperation with A Guide for Identifying and Delineating the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Hydric Soils, Version 8.2, 2018 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils Version 8.2, 2018 (Including revisions to versions 8.0 and 8.1) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Edited by L.M. Vasilas, Soil Scientist, NRCS, Washington, DC; G.W. Hurt, Soil Scientist, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and J.F. Berkowitz, Soil Scientist, USACE, Vicksburg, MS ii In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. -
Table S1. Cryo-EM Data Acquisition and Image Processing
Table S1. Cryo-EM data acquisition and image processing. Data Collection Electron Microscope Titan Krios Camera Falcon 4 Voltage (kV) 300 Nominal Magnification 75,000 Calibrated physical pixel size (Å) 1.03 Total exposure (e/Å2) 42 Exposure rate (e/pixel/s) 4.6 Number of frames 29 Defocus range (μm) 0.9 to 2 Image Processing Motion correction software MotionCor2 CTF estimation software cryoSPARC v2 Particle selection software cryoSPARC v2 Micrographs used in inhibitor free dataset 3,953 Micrographs used in Inz-5 bound dataset 4,396 Particle images selected in inhibitor free 1,151,426 dataset Particle images selected in Inz-5 bound dataset 1,129,413 3D map classification and refinement software cryoSPARC v2 Table S2. CryoEM map and atomic model statistics. Dataset Inhibitor Inz-5 free bound Associated PDB ID Modelling and Coot, Coot, refinement phenix, phenix, software ISOLDE ISOLDE Protein residues 1906 1909 Ligand HEM:3, HEM:3, FES:1, FES:1, UQ:2 INZ:1 RMSD bond length 0.004 0.003 (Å) RMSD bond angle 0.677 0.691 (°) Ramachandran 0 0 outliers (%) Ramachandran 96.13 97.25 favoured (%) Rotamer outliers 0 0 (%) Clash score 8.92 8.97 MolProbability 1.74 1.62 score EMringer score 4.25 4.04 Fig. S1. CryoEM map calculations for inhibitor free dataset. (A) UV-visible spectra of purified CIII2. (B) Representative micrograph and 2D class average images for CIII2. Scale bar, 500 Å. (C) Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curve after correction for solvent masking. (D) Viewing direction distribution for particle images. (E) Local resolution estimate for CIII2 map from non-uniform refinement with C2 symmetry. -
GUIDE to ADAPTED SWIMMING CLASSIFICATIONS Swimming Is
GUIDE TO ADAPTED SWIMMING CLASSIFICATIONS Swimming is the only sport that combines the conditions of limb loss, cerebral palsy (coordination and movement restrictions), spinal cord injury (weakness or paralysis involving any combination of the limbs) and other disabilities (such as Dwarfism (little people); major joint restriction conditions) across classes. Classes 1-10 – are allocated to swimmers with a physical disability Classes 11-13 – are allocated to swimmers with a visual disability Class 14 – is allocated to swimmers with an intellectual disability The Prefix S to the Class denotes the class for Freestyle, Backstroke and Butterfly The Prefix SB to the class denotes the class for Breaststroke The Prefix SM to the class denotes the class for Individual Medley. The range is from the swimmers with severe disability (S1, SB1, SM1) to those with the minimal disability (S10, SB9, SM10) In any one class some swimmers may start with a dive or in the water depending on their condition. This is factored in when classifying the athlete. The examples are only a guide – some conditions not mentioned may also fit the following classes. Locomotor Impaired (S1-S10): S1: Generally persons with complete spinal cord injuries below C4-C5 or cerebral palsy characterized by severe quadriplegia. Unable to catch the water. Severely limited propulsion from the arms due to muscle weakness, restricted range of motion or uncoordinated movements. No trunk control. No functional leg movements and significant leg drag. Assisted water start. Ordinarily uses the backstroke because of an inability to turn the head to breathe when swimming freestyle. S2: Generally persons with complete spinal cord injuries below C6-C7 or similar musculoskeletal impairment or cerebral palsy characterized by severe quadriplegia. -
National Classification? 13
NATIONAL CL ASSIFICATION INFORMATION FOR MULTI CLASS SWIMMERS Version 1.2 2019 PRINCIPAL PARTNER MAJOR PARTNERS CLASSIFICATION PARTNERS Version 1.2 2019 National Swimming Classification Information for Multi Class Swimmers 1 CONTENTS TERMINOLOGY 3 WHAT IS CLASSIFICATION? 4 WHAT IS THE CLASSIFICATION PATHWAY? 4 WHAT ARE THE ELIGIBLE IMPAIRMENTS? 5 CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS 6 CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM PARTNERS 6 WHAT IS A SPORT CLASS? 7 HOW IS A SPORT CLASS ALLOCATED TO AN ATHLETE? 7 WHAT ARE THE SPORT CLASSES IN MULTI CLASS SWIMMING? 8 SPORT CLASS STATUS 11 CODES OF EXCEPTION 12 HOW DO I CHECK MY NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION? 13 HOW DO I GET A NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION? 13 MORE INFORMATION 14 CONTACT INFORMATION 16 Version 1.2 2019 National Swimming Classification Information for Multi Class Swimmers 2 TERMINOLOGY Assessment Specific clinical procedure conducted during athlete evaluation processes ATG Australian Transplant Games SIA Sport Inclusion Australia BME Benchmark Event CISD The International Committee of Sports for the Deaf Classification Refers to the system of grouping athletes based on impact of impairment Classification Organisations with a responsibility for administering the swimming classification systems in System Partners Australia Deaflympian Representative at Deaflympic Games DPE Daily Performance Environment DSA Deaf Sports Australia Eligibility Criteria Requirements under which athletes are evaluated for a Sport Class Evaluation Process of determining if an athlete meets eligibility criteria for a Sport Class HI Hearing Impairment ICDS International Committee of Sports for the Deaf II Intellectual Impairment Inas International Federation for Sport for Para-athletes with an Intellectual Disability General term that refers to strategic initiatives that address engagement of targeted population Inclusion groups that typically face disadvantage, including people with disability. -
United States Olympic Committee and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
SELECTION STANDARDS United States Olympic Committee and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance Program The U.S. Olympic Committee supports Paralympic-eligible military veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games and other international sport competitions. Veterans who demonstrate exceptional sport skills and the commitment necessary to pursue elite-level competition are given guidance on securing the training, support, and coaching needed to qualify for Team USA and achieve their Paralympic dreams. Through a partnership between the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and the USOC, the VA National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events Office provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans of the Armed Forces training in a Paralympic sport, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. § 322(d) and section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program the VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum VA Monthly Assistance Allowance (VMAA) Standard in his/her respective sport and sport class at a recognized competition. Athletes must have established training and competition plans and are responsible for turning in monthly and/or quarterly forms and reports in order to continue receiving the monthly assistance allowance. Additionally, an athlete must be U.S. citizen OR permanent resident to be eligible. Lastly, in order to be eligible for the VMAA athletes must undergo either national or international classification evaluation (and be found Paralympic sport eligible) within six months of being placed on the allowance pay list. -
Early Childhood Special Education/Early Intervention Revalidated 2017
Initial Specialty Set: Early Childhood Special Education/Early Intervention Revalidated 2017 Initial Preparation Standard 1: Learner Development and Individual Learning Differences Knowledge ECSE.K1.1 Theories of typical and atypical early childhood development ECSE.K1.2 Biological and environmental factors that affect pre-, peri-, and postnatal development and learning ECSE.K1.3 Specific disabilities, including the etiology, characteristics, and classification of common disabilities in infants and young children, and specific implications for development and learning in the first years of life ECSE.K1.4 Impact of medical conditions and related care on development and learning ECSE.K1.5 Impact of medical conditions on family concerns, resources, and priorities ECSE.K1.6 Factors that affect the mental health and social-emotional development of infants and young children ECSE.K1.7 Infants and young children develop and learn at varying rates ECSE.K1.8 Impact of child’s abilities, needs, and characteristics on development and learning ECSE.K1.9 Impact of language delays on cognitive, social-emotional, adaptive, play, temperament and motor development ECSE.K1.10 Impact of language delays on behavior Skills ECSE.S1.1 Develop, implement, and evaluate learning experiences and strategies that respect the diversity of infants and young children, and their families ECSE.S1.2 Develop and match learning experiences and strategies to characteristics of infants and young children ECSE.S1.3 Support and facilitate family and child interactions as primary -
Carbonaceous Aerosol Microphysics
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 4543–4592, 2010 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/10/4543/2010/ Chemistry ACPD © Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under and Physics 10, 4543–4592, 2010 the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Discussions This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry Carbonaceous and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP if available. aerosol microphysics S. E. Bauer et al. A global modeling study on Title Page carbonaceous aerosol microphysical Abstract Introduction Conclusions References characteristics and radiative forcing Tables Figures S. E. Bauer1,2, S. Menon3, D. Koch1,2, T. C. Bond4, and K. Tsigaridis1 J I 1NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA J I 2The Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA 3Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA Back Close 4University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Full Screen / Esc Received: 20 January 2010 – Accepted: 8 February 2010 – Published: 15 February 2010 Correspondence to: S. E. Bauer ([email protected]) Printer-friendly Version Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Interactive Discussion 4543 Abstract ACPD Recently, attention has been drawn towards black carbon aerosols as a short-term cli- mate warming mitigation candidate. However the global and regional impacts of the 10, 4543–4592, 2010 direct, cloud-indirect and semi-direct forcing effects are highly uncertain, due to the 5 complex nature of aerosol evolution and the way that mixed, aged aerosols interact Carbonaceous with clouds and radiation. A detailed aerosol microphysical scheme, MATRIX, em- aerosol microphysics bedded within the GISS climate model is used in this study to present a quantitative assessment of the impact of microphysical processes involving black carbon, such as S. -
2021 Florida Elite Football Official Rulebook
2021 FLORIDA ELITE FOOTBALL OFFICIAL RULEBOOK 2021 FL ELITE RULEBOOK 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I-THE FLORIDA ELITE PROGRAM HEADQUARTERS CONFERENCE REMARKS ADMINISTRATIVE BYLAWS MANUAL MISSION STATEMENT GOALS AND PHILOSOPHY OF THE FLORIA ELITE PROGRAM PART II-FLORIDA ELITE STRUCTURE DEFINITIONS S1-LEAGUE S2-ASSOCIATION S3-ADMINISTRATORS S4-TEAM S5-DIVISION INTRODUCTION TO THE RULES PART III - FLORIDA ELITE REGULATIONS ARTICLE 1: POWERS/AUTHORITY OF LEAGUE ARTICLE 2: BOUNDARIES ARTICLE 3: COACHES REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE 4: REGISTRATION S1-PARENTAL CONSENT S2-MEDICAL EXAMINATION S3-PROOF OF AGE S4-SCHOLASTIC FITNESS S5-INFECTIOUS DISEASE WAIVER ARTICLE 5: FORMATION OF TEAMS AND SQUADS ARTICLE 6: MANDATORY CUTS ARTICLE 7: VOLUNTARY CUTS ARTICLE 8: CERTIFICATION ARTICLE 9: DROPS AND ADDS ARTICLE 10: NO ALL-STARS ARTICLE 11: AWARDS ARTICLE 12: PRACTICE ARTICLE 13: CAMPS ARTICLE 14: IMPORTANT POINT – MEDICAL & CONCUSSIONS S1-CONCUSSIONS ARTICLE 15: CHARGING ADMISSION ARTICLE 16: PROTESTS ARTICLE 17: PATCH REQUIREMENT ARTICLE 18: MANDATORY BACKGROUND CHECKS PART IV - ENFORCEMENT POLICY POLICE POWERS/HEARINGS & APPEALS MINIMUM MANDATED PENALTIES S1-ADULT OFFENSES S2-JUVENILE OFFENSES S3-TEAM AND ASSOCIATION OFFENSES 2021 FL ELITE RULEBOOK 2 PART V-GENERAL FOOTBALL RULES RULE 1: AGE REQUIREMENTS RULE 2: LENGTH OF PERIODS RULE 3: DIGITAL BOOK CHECK PROCEDURES RULE 4: PLAYING FIELDS RULE 5: INJURED PLAYERS PART VI- ROOKIE - SENIORS FOOTBALL RULES RULE 1: AGES RULE 2: CERTIFICATION OF PLAYERS RULE 3: ROSTER SIZE S1-MAXIMUM ROSTER SIZE: S2-MINIMUM ROSTER -
List Biathlon Middle Distance
BIATHLON MIDDLE DISTANCE START LIST As of 27 JAN 2018 NPC Sport Start IPCNS WC Bib Name Code Class % Time S1 S2 S3 S4 T Points Points Time Women Middle,Visually Impaired 1 REMIZOVA Elena NPA B3 100 09:30:30 111.04 320 Guide: TOKAREV Andrei 2 GALITSYNA Marina NPA B1 88 09:31:00 106.81 223 Guide: PIROGOV Maksim 3 HOSCH Vivian GER B1 88 09:31:30 91.68 280 Guide: SCHILLINGER F 4 RUBANOVSKA Natalia UKR B2 99 09:32:00 70.17 85 Guide: NESTERENKO Lada 5 KLUG Clara GER B1 88 09:32:30 13.64 280 Guide: HARTL Martin 6 SHYSHKOVA Oksana UKR B2 99 09:33:00 0.00 90 Guide: KAZAKOV Vitaliy 7 LYSOVA Mikhalina (WL) NPA B2 99 09:33:30 0.00 500 Guide: IVANOV Alexey Men Middle,Visually Impaired 11 KANAFIN Kairat KAZ B2 99 09:40:30 204.91 Guide: ZHDANOVICH Anton 12 DUBOIS Thomas FRA B1 88 09:41:00 168.61 126 Guide: SAUVAGE Bastien 13 CHOI Bogue KOR B3 100 09:41:30 162.70 65 Guide: KIM Hyunwoo 14 UDALTSOV Vladimir NPA B3 100 09:42:00 150.03 137 Guide: BOGACHEV Ruslan 15 POVAROV Nikita NPA B3 100 09:42:30 149.93 206 Guide: ELISEEV Pavel 16 PONOMAREV Oleg NPA B2 99 09:43:00 137.80 32 Guide: ROMANOV Andrei 17 GARBOWSKI Piotr POL B3 100 09:43:30 135.49 69 Guide: TWARDOWSKI J 18 ARTEMOV Aleksandr NPA B1 88 09:44:00 125.38 209 Guide: CHEREPANOV Ilia 19 MAKHOTKIN Oleksandr UKR B3 100 09:44:30 124.74 16 Guide: NIKULIN Denys 20 HOLUB Yury BLR B3 100 09:45:00 82.45 45 Guide: BUDZILOVICH D 21 POLUKHIN Nikolai NPA B2 99 09:45:30 73.45 345 Guide: BEREZIN Eduard 22 CHALENCON Anthony FRA B1 88 09:46:00 22.36 133 Guide: VALVERDE Simon 23 LUK'YANENKO Vitaliy UKR B3 100 09:46:30