Fortescue Metals Group Annu Al Report 2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rutila Resources Ltd ASX
Rutila Resources Ltd ASX : RTA For personal use only Investor Presentation 27 November 2013 Rutila Resources Ltd – Disclaimer This Presentation has been prepared by Rutila Resources Ltd (ABN 139 886 187) (Rutila or the Company). This Presentation contains summary information about Rutila and its subsidiaries (Rutila Group) and their activities current as at the date of this Presentation. The information in this Presentation is of general background and does not purport to be complete or to comprise all the information that a shareholder or potential investor in Rutila may require in order to determine whether to deal in Rutila shares. It should be read in conjunction with Rutila Group’s other periodic and continuous disclosure announcements lodged with the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), which are available at www.asx.com.au. This document is not a prospectus or a product disclosure statement under the Corporations Act (Cth) 2001 (Corporations Act) and has not been lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Not investment or financial product advice This Presentation is for information purposes only and is not financial product or investment advice or a recommendation to acquire Rutila shares and has been prepared without taking into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of individuals. Before making an investment decision, prospective investors should consider the appropriateness of the information having regard to their own objectives, financial situation and needs and seek financial, legal and taxation advice appropriate to their jurisdiction. Rutila is not licensed to provide financial product advice in respect of Rutila shares. Cooling off rights do not apply to the acquisition of Rutila shares. -
Australian Government Takeovers Panel Index of Reasons By
Australian Government Takeovers Panel Index of Reasons By Legislation 2000 – 30 June 2019 Takeovers Panel Index of published reasons - By legislation - 2000 to 30 June 2019 The information in this index is current as at 30 June 2019. This index is provided by the Panel for the general assistance of parties and the public. It makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information contained in the index. The Panel will update the index from time to time. If you have any suggestions in terms of improving the index, please email [email protected] Corporations Act s9 'Panel Proceedings' GoldLink IncomePlus Limited 04R [2009] ATP 3, [11] s9 'Relevant Agreement' Isis Communications Limited [2002] ATP 10 Winepros Limited [2002] ATP 18, [26] World Oil Resources Limited [2013] ATP 1, [52] Touch Holdings Limited [2013] ATP 3 Merlin Diamonds Limited [2016] ATP 18, [34] Molopo Energy Limited 01 & 02 [2017] ATP 10, [49 Molopo Energy Limited 03R, 04R & 05R [2017] ATP 12, [53] s9 'Voting Share' The President's Club Limited [2012] ATP 10, [77] Condor Blanco Mines Limited [2016] ATP 8, [34] s9 'Remedial Order' Molopo Energy Limited 03R, 04R & 05R [2017] ATP 12, [280], footnote 80 s11 Molopo Energy Limited 01 & 02 [2017] ATP 10, [53(a)] s12 Taipan Resources NL 03 [2000] ATP 17, [72]-[79] (Corp Law 12) Winepros Limited [2002] ATP 18 Anzoil NL 01 [2002] ATP 19, [52]-[60] Aztec Resources Limited [2006] ATP 28, [37]-[41] BigAir Group Limited [2008] ATP 12 Mesa Minerals Limited [2010] ATP 4, [41] CMI Limited [2011] ATP 4 CMI Limited -
Atlas Iron Limited 67
David Flanagan Atlas Iron Limited 67 ASX Small to Mid Caps Conference Hong Kong 2008 Disclaimer This presentation has been prepared by Atlas Iron Limited (“Atlas” or the “Company”). It should not be considered as an offer or invitation to subscribe for or purchase any securities in the Company or as an inducement to make an offer or invitation with respect to those securities. No agreement to subscribe for securities in the Company will be entered into on the basis of this presentation. This presentation contains forecasts and forward looking information. Such forecasts, projections and information are not a guarantee of future performance, involve unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results and developments will almost certainly differ materially from those expressed or implied. There are a number of risks, both specific to Atlas and of a general nature which may affect the future operating and financial performance of Atlas and the value of an investment in Atlas including and not limited to economic conditions, stock market fluctuations, iron ore demand and price movements, timing of access to infrastructure, timing of environmental approvals, regulatory risks, operational risks, reliance on key personnel, reserve and resource estimations, native title and title risks, foreign currency fluctuations, and mining development, construction and commissioning risk. You should not act or refrain from acting in reliance on this presentation material. This overview of Atlas does not purport to be all inclusive or to contain all information which its recipients may require in order to make an informed assessment of the Company’s prospects. You should conduct your own investigation and perform your own analysis in order to satisfy yourself as to the accuracy and completeness of the information, statements and opinions contained in this presentation before making any investment decision. -
Australian Mining League Table –
Australian Mining League table – Q1 2014 Australian Mining League table – Q1 2014 Position Market Capitalisation Differe Differenc Q1 2014 Q4 2013 nce e Moving into the Company Q1 Q4 Moveme ($A ($A ($A 2014 2013 nt million) million) (%) million) top 25: BHP Billiton Limited (ASX:BHP) 1 1 194,149.9 202,204.3 -4.0% (8,054.4) • Western Areas in at 22 up from 32 Rio Tinto Ltd. (ASX:RIO) 2 2 117,516.2 126,029.9 -6.8% (8,513.7) Fortescue Metals Group Limited 3 3 16,347.4 18,122.3 -9.8% (1,774.9) • OceanaGold in at (ASX:FMG) 25 up from 30 Alcoa Inc. (NYSE:AA) 4 4 14,963.6 12,713.2 17.7% 2,250.4 Newcrest Mining Limited (ASX:NCM) 5 5 7,575.6 5,971.7 26.9% 1,603.9 AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. (JSE:ANG) 6 6 7,547.4 5,270.4 43.2% 2,277.0 Iluka Resources Ltd. (ASX:ILU) 7 7 4,140.0 3,599.3 15.0% 540.7 Washington H. Soul Pattinson and 8 8 3,717.8 3,497.6 6.3% 220.2 Company Limited (ASX:SOL) Alumina Ltd. (ASX:AWC) 9 9 3,353.4 3,128.9 7.2% 224.5 New Hope Corporation Limited 10 10 2,484.5 2,766.5 -10.2% (282.0) (ASX:NHC) Arrium Limited (ASX:ARI) 11 11 1,831.3 2,371.6 -22.8% (540.3) Whitehaven Coal Limited 12 12 1,697.5 1,959.1 -13.4% (261.6) (ASX:WHC) Regis Resources Limited (ASX:RRL) 13 13 1,134.4 1,454.1 -22.0% (319.7) Moving out of the OZ Minerals Limited (ASX:OZL) 14 18 1,080.3 954.7 13.2% 125.6 top 25: Mount Gibson Iron Limited 15 14 992.4 1,106.9 -10.3% (114.5) (ASX:MGX) • Yancoal at 36 Aquila Resources Limited 16 19 963.0 947.1 1.7% 15.9 down from 24 (ASX:AQA) PanAust Limited (ASX:PNA) 17 15 961.7 1,075.7 -10.6% (114.0) • BC Iron in at 30 down from 25 Independence Group NL (ASX:IGO) 18 22 912.3 725.6 25.7% 186.7 Sandfire Resources NL (ASX:SFR) 19 17 908.9 1,005.4 -9.6% (96.5) Atlas Iron Limited (ASX:AGO) 20 16 892.6 1,052.8 -15.2% (160.2) Alacer Gold Corp. -
20130627 D107351
Ref: O10_0347 Submission to the Economic Regulation Authority – Floor and ceiling costs proposed by The Pilbara Infrastructure (TPI) 11 June 2013 FLOOR AND CEILING COSTS PROPOSED BY THE PILBARA INFRASTRUCTURE (TPI) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 2 2. CONTEXT AND PURPOSE ................................................................................................................... 2 1. Context .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Purpose........................................................................................................................................... 3 3. REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE ........................................................................................................... 4 4. COMMENTS ON COSTS PROPOSED BY TPI ....................................................................................... 5 1. TPI failure to provide costs for proposed access ................................................................... 5 2. TPI failure to provide Costing Model or supporting information ......................................... 5 3. Factors to be considered in an assessment of costs ............................................................. 6 5. BROCKMAN’S ASSESSMENT OF COSTS FOR THE ROUTE .................................................................. 7 6. COMPARISON -
Atlas Iron Limited June 2010
JUNE 2010 QUARTERLY REPORT 28 JULY 2010 HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE JUNE 2010 QUARTER Mining commences at Wodgina. Atlas is on track to more than quadruple Pilbara iron ore exports to a 6Mtpa rate by December 2010. 173,557 WMT shipped. 322,686 ore tonnes processed. 283,114 ore tonnes mined. Improved costs at Pardoo as production ramps up. Hercules prospect discovered at Wodgina. Maiden Inferred resource on the Wishbone deposit at the Warrawanda Project, south east Pilbara. $63.5 million fund raising completed in May 2010 to fast track ramp up of DSO production to benefit from strong market demand. $155.2 million of cash on hand at 30 June 2010. Subsequent to the end of the quarter: commissioning of the Wodgina crushing and screening facility was completed, with ore production expected to commence in mid- August. JUNE 2010 QUARTERLY REPORT Page 1 of 9 QUARTERLY REPORT ATLAS IRON LIMITED JUNE 2010 OPERATIONS PRODUCTION Table 1: Mine Production 12 June March Variance Variance Months to Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter June 30 10 (t) 10 (t) (t) (%) (t) Ore Tonnes Mined 283,114 389,703 -106,589 -27% 1,239,813 Ore Tonnes Processed 322,686 335,155 -12,469 -4% 1,258,683 Ore Tonnes Shipped (Dry) 164,706 326,521 -161,815 -50% 1,109,159 Table 2: Inventory June March Variance Variance Quarter 10 (t) Quarter 10 (t) Quarter (t) Quarter (%) Run of Mine Ore Stocks 42,647 71,936 -29,289 -41% Final Product Stocks - Site 34,691 63,782 -29,091 -46% Final Product Stocks - Port 242,152 101,766 140,386 138% Mining during the quarter at Pardoo focussed on pit development and waste mining at the South Limb and Alice East as the site prepares for expanded production leading up to the end of the calendar year. -
The Mineral Industry of Australia in 2008
2008 Minerals Yearbook AUSTRALIA U.S. Department of the Interior August 2010 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUS T RY OF AUS T RALIA By Pui-Kwan Tse Australia was one of the world’s leading mineral producing and the Brockman iron project in the Pilbara region of Western countries and ranked among the top 10 countries in the world Australia (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource in the production of bauxite, coal, cobalt, copper, gem and Economics, 2009a). near-gem diamond, gold, iron ore, lithium, manganese ore, tantalum, and uranium. Since mid-2008, the global financial Minerals in the National Economy crisis had sharply weakened world economic activities, and the slowdown had been particularly pronounced in the developed Australia’s mining sector contributed more than $105 billion countries in the West. Emerging Asian economies were also to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), or 7.7% of the adversely affected by the sharply weaker demand for exports GDP during fiscal year 2007-08. In 2008, the mining sector and tighter credit conditions. After a period of strong expansion, employed 173,900 people who worked directly in mining and an Australia’s economic growth decreased by 0.5% in the final additional 200,000 who were involved in supporting the mining quarter of 2008. Overall, Australia’s economy grew at a rate activities. Expectations of sustained levels of global demand for of 2.4% during 2008. During the past several years, owing to minerals led to increased production of minerals and metals in anticipated higher prices of mineral commodities in the world Australia, and the mineral industry was expected to continue markets, Australia’s mineral commodity output capacities to be a major contributor to the Australian economy in the next expanded rapidly. -
The Mineral Industry of Australia in 2007
2007 Minerals Yearbook AUSTRALIA U.S. Department of the Interior December 2009 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUS T RY OF AUS T RALIA By Pui-Kwan Tse Australia was one of the world’s leading mineral producing Constitution belong to the States and Territories. All powers that countries and ranked among the top 10 countries in the world in relate to mineral resources and their production belong to the the production of bauxite, coal, cobalt, copper, gem and near- States and Territories. Except for the Australian Capital Territory gem diamond, gold, iron ore, lithium, manganese ore, tantalum, (that is, the capital city Canberra and its environs), all Australian and uranium. Reflecting an increase in world demand for States and Territories have identified mineral resources and mineral commodities, the Australian economy grew at a rate of established mineral industries. 3.9% during 2007. Owing to anticipated higher prices of mineral The Mineral Council of Australia (MCA) urged the Federal commodities in the world markets, the Australian economy Government to establish a nationwide project approval process continued expanding and, as a result, surplus productive that would be consistent across all jurisdictions to reduce capacity was expected in the future. Owing to an increase in regulatory burdens that were affecting the mineral sector. In domestic demand and a tightening in the labor market, the addition, 10 principal statutes govern occupational health and consumer price index increased by 4.2% in 2007. safety in Australia, and, according to the MCA, this multilayer Australia’s total mineral exploration spending, excluding regulatory regime imposes a significant administrative burden petroleum, was $1,751.9 million (A$2,061.1 million) in 2007. -
Feature Feature Major Wa Mining Projects
FEATURE FEATURE MINING OUTLOOK Construction workers needed for major Major WA mining projects MINING OUTLOOK 27,000 WA resources projects 2014-15 Source: Pitcrew Port Hedland Pardoo Rio Tinto rail MAJOR WA MINING PROJECTS Dampier Cape Lambert Iron Bridge Mt Dove Rio Tinto mine Completed in past year Balla Balla Abydos (Forge Resources) BHP rail Karara Mining Karara project $2.6bn Mid West Production ramp-up proceeding Sino Iron Wodgina Rio Tinto Hope Downs 4 mine $2.1bn Pilbara First production in H1 2013, ramping up to 15mtpa BHP mine Rio Tinto Marandoo mine expansion $1.1bn Pilbara Production will be sustained at 15mtpa for 16 further years Mt Webber McPhee Creek FMG rail Fortescue Metals Christmas Creek 2 expansion $US1.0bn Pilbara Completed in June 2013 quarter Fortescue Metals Port Hedland port expansion $US2.4bn Pilbara Fourth berth and support infrastructure opened in Aug 2013 Pannawonica FMG mine Atlas Iron Mt Dove mine development n/a Pilbara Production commenced in Dec 2012 Hancock proposed rail Atlas Iron Abydos mine development n/a Pilbara First haulage in Aug 2013, ramping up to 2-3mtpa Solomon Atlas Iron Utah Point 2 stockyard n/a Pilbara Largely complete and now ready to receive ore Hancock mine Hub Christmas Creek Rio Tinto Argyle Diamonds underground mine $US2.2bn Kimberley Production commenced in H1 2013 and is ramping up Buckland (Iron Ore Holdings) Cloudbreak Mineral Resources Sandfire Resources DeGrussa copper mine $US384m Mid West Ramp-up to nameplate production nearing completion Koodaideri Roy Hill Atlas Iron Construction -
Integrated Rail Network Closure Plan
Report Integrated Rail Network Closure Plan Long Term Mine Planning 7 June 2018 R-PL-EN-0041 Rev 0 CLOSURE GUIDELINE CHECKLIST Report This closure plan addresses the progressive rehabilitation and closure of rail infrastructure projects associated with the Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2004. In the absence of regulatory guidelines for inland infrastructure projects, this closure plan follows the report structure described within the Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans May 2015 published by the Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum (now the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety) and Environmental Protection Authority. The closure of mining operations, including quarries, is not within the scope of this closure plan. Closure Plan (CP) checklist Y/N Page Comments 1 Has the Checklist been endorsed by a senior Y 2 Report has been endorsed using representative within the tenement holder/operating standard Fortescue processes. company? Public Availability 2 Are you aware that from 2015 all CPs will be made N/A This report is not subject to mine closure publicly available? conditions under the Mining Act. 3 Is there any information in the CP that should not be N publicly available? 4 If “Yes” to Q3, has confidential information been N/A submitted in a separate document/section? Cover Page, Table of Contents 5 Does the CP cover page include: Y 1 This report is provided for information • Project Title only. • Company Name • Contact Details (including telephone numbers and email addresses) • Document ID and version number • Date of submission (needs to match the date of this checklist) Scope and Purpose 6 State why the CP is submitted Y 11 This plan has been provided to support the Eliwana Rail Project Public Environmental Review. -
Ecohydrological Conceptualisation of the Fortescue Marsh Region
REPORT Ecohydrological Conceptualisation of the Fortescue Marsh Region Prepared for BHP Billiton Iron Ore September 2015 This report has been prepared solely for the purposes of informing environmental impact assessment pursuant to the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) and Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) and is not intended for use for any other purpose. No representation or warranty is given that project development associated with any or all of the disturbance indicated in this report will actually proceed. As project development is dependent upon future events , the outcome of which is uncertain and cannot be assured, actual development may vary materially from this report. Ecohydrological Conceptualisation of the Fortescue Marsh Region This document has been prepared for the benefit of BHP Billiton Iron Ore. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement. QUALITY STATEMENT PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT TECHNICAL LEAD Tracy Schwinkowski Milo Simonic PREPARED BY Milo Simonic ………………………………............... 02/09/2015… CHECKED BY Johan van Rensburg ………………………………............... 02/09/2015… REVIEWED BY Gary Clark ………………………………............... 02/09/2015… APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY Milo Simonic ………………………………............... 02/09/2015… PERTH 41 Bishop Street, -
Mammoet World Getting to the Mine
GETTING TO THE MINE ON TIME Three draglines, two continents, one objective Issue 13 | 2014 MAMMOET WORLD 67 ine sites are often situated at remote locations. Getting a dragline there involves dealing with a variety of circumstances, such as negotiating M gravel or sand roads, having to remove power lines or reinforcing the road after heavy rainfall in the desert. The greatest challenge is timing; the dragline needs to be operational as soon as possible. State-of-the-art equipment, coupled with knowledge and experience, ensures the heavy equipment reaches its destination safely and on time. Slashing travel time for through the desert, reducing travel excavation site of native American El Segundo Mine, USA time with 60%, from over 30 to 12 artifacts. Because of these width Peabody Energy needed to move days. The better restrictions the SPMT train was their 3500-ton dragline over a longer than preferable, and a distance of 22 miles (32 km) The dragline was the first machine option was special support structure was through the New Mexican desert of that weight to be transported designed to complete the job; we to their El Segundo Mine. over such a long distance. This job to load the added a steel structure made of required the removal of the bucket beams, each 3 ft tall, on top of The dragline, the size of a ship on and walking shoes in order to load dragline each trailer to function as load dry land, is designed to ‘walk’ by the dragline onto trailers for more spreader to ensure the load was using shoes that lift and advance feasible transport.