Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria Eugene Monroe, MD GOAL To understand chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) to better manage patients with the condition OBJECTIVES Upon completion of this activity, dermatologists and general practitioners should be able to: 1. Describe the effect of CIU on patient quality of life. 2. Discuss antihistamine use in the treatment of CIU. 3. Explain the anti-inflammatory properties of antihistamines. CME Test on page 104. This article has been peer reviewed and is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing approved by Michael Fisher, MD, Professor of medical education for physicians. Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Albert Einstein College of Medicine designates Review date: July 2005. this educational activity for a maximum of 1 This activity has been planned and implemented category 1 credit toward the AMA Physician’s in accordance with the Essential Areas and Policies Recognition Award. Each physician should of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical claim only that credit that he/she actually spent Education through the joint sponsorship of Albert in the activity. Einstein College of Medicine and Quadrant This activity has been planned and produced in HealthCom, Inc. Albert Einstein College of Medicine accordance with ACCME Essentials. Dr. Monroe is in the speakers program and has been a clinical investigator for Sanofi-Aventis and Schering- Plough Corporation. The author discusses off-label use for antihistamines, antileukotrienes, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, doxepin, and tricyclic antidepressants. Dr. Fisher reports no conflict of interest. Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) can have a to the individual. Oral H1 antihistamines are the profound effect on patient quality of life (QOL). mainstay of therapy for CIU, but agents within Ideally, any therapy used to treat CIU should be this class diverge in their individual therapeutic effective across a wide range of doses without indices. The literature was reviewed to compare causing unwanted side effects; a wide therapeu- the currently available oral H1 antihistamines tic window allows the physician to tailor treatment regarding their efficacy and safety at a wide range of doses. If sedation and cognitive impair- ment are considered relevant to treatment selec- Accepted for publication April 12, 2005. tion due to their effect on QOL and safety, then Dr. Monroe is President, Department of Dermatology, Advanced newer-generation agents should be selected Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. over older-generation antihistamines. There are Reprints: Eugene Monroe, MD, Department of Dermatology, Advanced Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI 53209-4590 few well-controlled clinical studies in which (e-mail: [email protected]). newer-generation agents have been directly 118 CUTIS® Antihistamines for CIU compared. Moreover, there are no evidence- the effect of a disease or its treatment. This based data demonstrating statistical superiority parameter is particularly pertinent to CIU, as of one newer-generation agent over another in evidenced by O’Donnell et al9 whose analysis of a the treatment of CIU. However, of the newer disease-specific, purpose-designed questionnaire agents, those that are labelled nonsedating at and the Nottingham Health Profile demonstrated recommended doses (fexofenadine, loratadine, that patients with chronic urticaria experienced and desloratadine) should be selected over considerable disability, handicap, and reduced cetirizine. In cases where the physician judges QOL. Part 1 of the health profile showed that that a higher-than-recommended dose should be patients were restricted in areas of mobility, prescribed, or when the patient is likely to take a sleep, and energy and experienced pain, social higher dose, the relative safety profile of these isolation, and altered emotional reactions. Part 2 agents demands detailed consideration. showed that patients experienced problems in Cutis. 2005;76:118–126. relation to work, home management, social life, relationships, sex life, hobbies, and holidays. Interestingly, patients in this survey had almost ow idiopathic is chronic idiopathic urticaria identical scores for part 1 of the health profile as (CIU)? With the fast pace of scientific and did patients with coronary artery disease; both H medical discovery, it is anomalous that dis- groups experienced lack of energy, feelings of eases with no known cause remain. However, social isolation, and emotional upset.9 despite the fact that CIU is less well understood Perhaps because skin diseases are so visible and than many other diseases, recent findings have thus potentially stigmatizing, dermatology patients partially illuminated this condition’s etiology. can be impacted significantly in terms of QOL; At least 2 subgroups of patients with CIU exist. however, the effect of CIU appears to be particu- One group is composed of 30% to 50% of patients larly acute. Using the validated Dermatology Life with CIU with autoimmune chronic urticaria Quality Index (DLQI), a survey of 170 consecutive caused by autoantibodies against either the high- patients had results that showed that patients with affinity immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptor Fc⑀RI or, CIU experienced greater QOL impairment than less commonly, IgE.1,2 Patients in this subgroup outpatients with either psoriasis, acne, or vitiligo have an increased likelihood of thyroid autoimmu- and experienced a comparable level of impairment nity; thyroid autoantibodies, Hashimoto thyroidi- to patients with severe atopic dermatitis.10 Because tis, and Graves disease are recognized as being of CIU’s devastating effect on health-related QOL associated with CIU.3 Indeed, 27% of patients and the discomfort of CIU, appropriate treatment with CIU have high-titre antithyroglobulin, selection is crucial. The ideal treatment for CIU antithyroid peroxidase autoantibodies, or both, would not only rid the patient of the wheals, and 19% have abnormal thyroid function.3 How- edema, and pruritus that characterize the condition ever, the remaining 50% to 70% of patients with but also improve QOL. This review outlines the CIU are truly idiopathic, because there is no treatment options available, focusing on oral H1 known cause for the disease.1 antihistamines, and offers a means of differentiating In keeping with the illusive nature of CIU, the this class of agent. prevalence of the disease has not been firmly estab- lished.4 Most recent estimates suggest that 15% to Antihistamines in the Treatment of CIU 20% of the US population experience at least one It is well established that elevated tissue levels of episode of urticaria in their lifetime, and up to 3% histamine are found in the skin of patients with of the population are diagnosed with CIU.5,6 Inter- different forms of chronic urticaria.11-13 Although estingly, middle-aged women are more likely to more subclasses of histamine receptors have been 7 experience the condition than other groups ; also, identified, those initially isolated—H1 and H2— women are approximately 3 times more likely than are involved in the cutaneous responses seen in men to acquire any autoimmune disease during urticaria. Specifically, the binding of histamine to 8 their lifetime, supporting the notion that CIU is the H1 receptor causes erythema (by vasodilation), often an autoimmune disease. edema (by increasing vascular permeability), and itching. The same responses, with the exception of Quality of Life itching, are caused by histamine binding to the H2 The impact of a disease extends beyond physical signs receptor. In 30% to 50% of patients diagnosed with and symptoms; health-related quality of life (QOL) CIU, histamine release from mast cells leads to also should play a pivotal role in the evaluation of wheal formation because of an autoimmune process. VOLUME 76, AUGUST 2005 119 Antihistamines for CIU In contrast, patients with CIU without this auto- following overdose of older-generation antihista- immune response experience the same effects of mines because of the drug’s lack of selectivity.22-25 mast cell degranulation and subsequent release of Because older-generation antihistamines can histamine by a process yet to be elucidated. bind to H1 receptors in the brain and histamine in The sentinel involvement of histamine in CIU the brain plays a role in central nervous system is, therefore, unequivocal; irrespective of etiology, arousal and alertness, these agents also are associated the appropriate use of H1 antihistamines—which with sedation and cognitive impairment (eg, stabilize an active conformation of the H1 receptor impaired sensorimotor coordination and decreases in and thus prevent activation by histamine—remains attention span, memory function, ability to process the basis of treatment.14 However, for patients information, and psychomotor performance16,26,27). unresponsive to conventional H1-antihistamine The binding of first-generation antihistamines to monotherapy, adjunctive treatments often are pre- cerebral H1 receptors has been demonstrated in scribed including a combination of H1 antihistamines many studies employing objective psychometric tests (either 2 different newer-generation agents con- and also by the relatively new technique of positron currently or a newer-generation agent plus a first- emission tomographic imaging.28-30 generation agent at night), H2 antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants (principally doxepin), Newer-Generation Antihistamines antileukotriene therapy,