DOCSLIB.ORG

6May200802345548

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6May200802345548 2009-10K-wrap2.indd 1 4/14/10 10:41 AM 6MAY200802345548 Dear Valued Shareholder: We were a highly profitable company in 2009—generating over $50 million in earnings. Yet we’re not satisfied with our results. EnergySolutions did not meet its initial expectations of performance, due to the length and depth of the global recession and its impact on the spending plans of our customer base. Our results were also significantly impacted by foreign currency exchange rates that reduced profitability, in US dollar terms, of our international operations. Despite these headwinds, we executed well in other areas of our business. We were profitable in every segment, in every quarter. The strong cash flow we generated enabled us to pay down $48 million of long-term debt and significantly improve our balance sheet. We submitted bids on a number of upcoming major federal contract awards that could generate substantial revenues in future years. And, when the work was available from our federal and commercial customers, we continued to maintain or grow our market share in the key services that we provide to the nuclear industry. This is evidence of our strong customer relationships, our valuable and experienced workforce, and our unique facility- based services. The leadership position we have built in the industry was recognized by Engineering News Record, which for the second year in a row named EnergySolutions as the #1 All-Environmental Firm, as well as the #1 Nuclear Waste Clean-up Firm and the #1 Environmental Firm Working Abroad. We also continued to operate with the highest standards of safety in the nuclear industry. In 2009, our U.K. subsidiary, Magnox Electrix Ltd. was honored with numerous safety awards from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. The Magnox North Wylfa Power Station received the British Safety Council’s Sword of Honour, the most prestigious international health and safety accolade that a company can receive. In the U.S., we continued to receive various safety awards. We have worked hard to build a corporate culture deeply grounded in safety, and we appreciate the efforts of everyone in the organization to achieve the high standards we have set. Now, we turn our attention to 2010. While the current economic environment has brought many near-term challenges, we continue to be optimistic about the growth opportunities for EnergySolutions as the long-term outlook for the nuclear industry has never been stronger. Nuclear projects are underway or being planned in dozens of countries around the world, and the industry appears to be taking a step forward in the United States after many years of stagnation. With the unique assets we possess, we believe we are well positioned to be a beneficiary of the global nuclear renaissance over the long term. However, in the near term, we believe that weak economic conditions will continue to have an impact on overall spending in our markets, particularly among our commercial customers. The recent recovery of the trust fund balances related to the Zion License Stewardship opportunity with Exelon is encouraging. We continue to aggressively pursue this opportunity. However, the timing of the commencement of this project remains largely dependent on factors beyond our control—namely a sustained economic recovery that will lead to generation of adequate trust fund balances to support the work effort. With respect to our government segment, we continue to pursue increased market share in Department of Energy (DOE) work. During 2010, we expect a number of awards to be made on significant DOE projects that should provide greater long-term visibility into this segment. We have submitted proposals on these projects and expect to be successful in receiving one or more of these awards. Additionally, we expect the continuing benefit from stimulus funds during 2010 and 2011 for a number of projects where we are engaged, including the Atlas mill tailings cleanup at Moab, UT, and on the Hanford Tank Operating contract at Hanford, WA. Internationally, our goal is to continue performing well on our Magnox contracts while we pursue additional opportunities in Europe and Asia. We are excited by our recent contract award in China pertaining to liquid waste system design for two new reactors under construction, which represents our first project in that country. We believe this project could lead to other meaningful work in China in the future. We have made some significant changes to our organizational structure for 2010 that are designed to facilitate our goal of better integrating our unique technologies, assets and expertise to serve our customers. We have reorganized the Company into three customer-focused groups: the international customer group, the government customer group, and the commercial customer group. The heads of these groups will report directly to the CEO, which will provide greater opportunities for integrating and leveraging the unique skill sets within each customer group. We believe this new structure will create a more customer-focused approach that enables us to better understand client needs in order to improve our ability to solve their problems, lower their costs, reduce their liabilities and increase their efficiencies. In this, our first letter to EnergySolutions shareholders, we want to express our appreciation for the interest and trust you have placed in the EnergySolutions team. We recognize that trust must be earned and comes with great responsibility. We are committed as a board and a management team to work hard to merit your continued trust. While 2009 was challenging, it has not affected our enthusiasm or our optimism about our long-term growth opportunities. There continues to be a fundamental need for the unique solutions we provide. We are committed to executing well on each of the opportunities available to us and to creating shareholder value. Sincerely, 9MAY200816260082 9APR201023161589 Val J. Christensen Steven R. Rogel President & CEO Chairman of the Board EnergySolutions EnergySolutions UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ፤ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 or អ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-33830 EnergySolutions, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 51-0653027 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number) 423 West 300 South, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (801) 649-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Class Name of Exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share The New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes អ No ፤ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes អ No ፤ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ፤ No អ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes អ No អ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. អ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer,’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ፤ Accelerated filer អ Non-accelerated filer អ Smaller reporting company អ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes អ No ፤ The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2009, was approximately $802 million based upon the closing price reported for such date on the New York Stock Exchange. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of common stock held by persons who hold more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock and shares held by executive officers and directors of the registrant have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of executive officer or affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. As of February 26, 2010, 88,499,706 shares of registrant’s common stock were outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Sections of Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than April 30, 2010, namely: ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis,’’ ‘‘Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,’’ ‘‘Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence’’ and ‘‘Principal Accounting Fees and Services,’’ are incorporated in this Form 10-K by reference under Part III.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. State of UTAH
    Page 1264 Page 1261 Denise Chancellor, Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Shurtleff, Utah Attorney General, and Fred G. 625 F.3d 1261 (10th Cir. 2010) Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, with her on the briefs), Office of the Utah Attorney General, Salt Lake ENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant State of Utah. v. Barbara J.B. Green, Sullivan Green Seavy, LLC, Boulder, CO (James S. Lowrie, Lewis M. Francis, and State of UTAH, Defendant-Appellant, Ryan M. Harris, Jones Waldo Holbrook & McDonough PC, Salt Lake City, UT, and Richard L. Masters, Masters, Rocky Mountain Low-Level Radioactive Waste Mullins & Arrington, Louisville, KY, with her on the Compact, Defendant-Intervenor. briefs), for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant Rocky EnergySolutions, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, Mountain Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact. v. Kristen K. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General (Robert M. McKenna, Attorney General, and Alice M. Rocky Mountain Low-Level Radioactive Waste Blado, Assistant Attorney General, with her on the Compact, Defendant-Appellant. briefs), Office of the Washington Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for Defendants-Appellants Northwest EnergySolutions, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, Interstate Compact on Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management and Michael Garner, solely as its Executive v. Director. Northwest Interstate Compact on Low-Level Michael S. Lee, Howrey LLP (Jared C. Fields, Radioactive Waste Management, and Michael Howrey LLP, and Robert S. Clark and Timothy B. Smith, Garner, solely in his official capacity as the Executive Parr Brown Gee & Loveless with him on the brief), Salt Director of the Northwest Interstate Compact on Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management, Defendants-Appellants, Gary K.
    [Show full text]
  • High Activity Filter Dispositioning
    High Activity Filter Dispositioning EnergySolutions and WMG have joined forces to create FilterSolutions™, a complete service combining industry-leading characterization expertise, packaging efficiency (FLTRSTOR™ System), e-Shipper™, cask transportation, high activity filter processing, and disposal capabilities. WMG’s FLTRSTOR™ System™ is made up The FilterSolutions™ processing facility at of filter racks and an integrated open-top EnergySolutions’ Bear Creek Operations container, optimizing the number of filters in Tennessee is able to perform remote, FLTRSTOR™ System that can be loaded in each shipment, while sophisticated, and ALARA sorting, segregation, reducing worker dose by limiting the number volume reduction, and/or encapsulation of of lifting evolutions required to load the filters. filters. In addition to the processing of filters EnergySolutions’ robust transportation and these services can be extended to soil, sludge, cask fleet further streamlines the process. and legacy “problem liners.” RADMAN™ data transfer authorization The final wasteform is sent to EnergySolutions’ provides a seamless transition for shipping, Clive facility in Utah for permanent disposal as processing, and/or disposal, allowing Class A waste. FilterSolutions to: (1) access legacy filter data, (2) re-characterize filters pre- and Call your EnergySolutions representative or post-processing, (3) assist in creating the visit our website for additional information on most efficient packaging plan, and (4) provide how this innovative, turnkey service can
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Medicine / PET Unit
    Australasian Health Facility Guidelines Part B - Health Facility Briefing and Planning 0500 - Nuclear Medicine / PET Unit Revision 6.0 23 May 2016 Australasian Health Facility Guidelines Index 01 INTRODUCTION 4 01.01 Preamble 4 01.02 Introduction 4 01.03 Policy Framework 4 01.04 Description 5 02 PLANNING 8 02.01 Operational Models 8 02.02 Operational Policies 8 02.03 Planning Models 13 02.04 Functional Areas 14 02.05 Functional Relationships 16 03 DESIGN 17 03.01 Access 17 03.02 Parking 17 03.03 Disaster Planning 17 03.04 Infection Prevention and Control 18 03.05 Environmental Considerations 18 03.06 Space Standards and Components 18 03.07 Safety and Security 20 03.08 Finishes 21 03.09 Fixtures, Fittings & Equipment 21 03.10 Building Service Requirements 22 04 COMPONENTS OF THE UNIT 25 04.01 Standard Components 25 04.02 Non-Standard Components 25 AX APPENDICES 33 AX.01 Schedule of Accommodation 33 AX.02 Functional Relationships / Diagrams 41 AX.03 Checklists 41 AX.04 References 42 AX.05 Iodine I-131 Bedroom 42 Part B - Health Facility Briefing and Planning Page 3 0500 - Nuclear Medicine / PET Unit, Revision 6.0, 23 May 2016 Australasian Health Facility Guidelines 01 INTRODUCTION 01.01 Preamble This Health Planning Unit (HPU) has been developed for use by the design team, project managers and end users to facilitate the process of planning and design. This revision combines HPUs: 480 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Unit and 500 Nuclear Medicine Unit which were previously provided as two separate documents. HPU 480 PET Unit will be discontinued.
    [Show full text]
  • Energysolutions, Inc. ( ES ) 423 WEST 300 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84101 801−649−2000
    EnergySolutions, Inc. ( ES ) 423 WEST 300 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84101 801−649−2000 www.energysolutions.com 10−K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filed on 3/28/2008 Filed Period 12/31/2007 Use these links to rapidly review the document ENERGY SOLUTIONS , INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10−K For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 Energy Solutions , Inc. Index to Consolidated Financial Statements Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10−K (Mark One) ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 001−33830 EnergySolutions, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 51−0653027 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 423 West 300 South, Suite 200 84101 Salt Lake City, Utah (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (801) 649−2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Class Name of Exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share The New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well−known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwmrc-03 Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control Radioactive Material License
    DWMRC-03 UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RADIATION CONTROL RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LICENSE Pursuant to the Utah Code Annotated (UCA), Title 19, Chapter 3 and R313 of the Utah Administrative Code and in reliance on statements and representations heretofore made by the Licensee designated below, a license is hereby issued authorizing such Licensee to transfer, receive, possess and use the radioactive material designated below; and to use such radioactive material for the purpose(s) and at the place(s) designated below. This Licensee is subject to all applicable rules, and orders now or hereafter in effect and to any conditions specified below. *********************************************************************************************** LICENSEE ) 3. License Number: UT 2300478 ) Amendment #0 1. Name EnergySolutions, LLC ) *********************************************** ) 4. Expiration Date 2. Address 299 S. Main St., Suite 1700 ) November 13, 2027 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 ) *********************************************** ) 5. License Category 2-c ********************************************************************************************** 6. Radioactive material 7. Chemical and/or 8. Maximum quantity (element and mass physical form Licensee may possess at number) any one time 11e.(2) Byproduct Packaged or Bulk 5,048,965 Cubic Yards Material Radioactive Waste ********************************************************************************************** SECTION 9.0. ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONS 9.1 All notices to the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control required under this license shall be addressed to the Director of the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (Director), Department of Environmental Quality, 195 North 1950 West, P.O. Box 144880, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880. 9.2 Authorized place for use shall be the Licensee’s facility located in Section 32 of Township 1 S, Range 11 W, Tooele County, Utah, near Clive.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-30-20 Transcript Bulletin
    TOOELETRANSCRIPT S T C BULLETIN S THURSDAY July 30, 2020 www.TooeleOnline.com Vol. 127 No. 18 $1.00 Nuclear power plant component reaches Clive 670-ton cylindrical steel vessel will stay at EnergySolutions’ Clive facility TIM GILLIE/TTB PHOTO Brett Peterson, director Division of Juvenile Justice Services; Donovan Bergstrom, program director Office of Youth Services, and Trina Dickinson, assistant program director for Salt Lake Valley Youth Centers (including Tooele and Summit counties) in the recreation room of the Tooele County Youth Center on July 29, 2020. Under an agreement with Tooele County, DJSS will provide staff and funding for the youth center’s operations. County, schools, state partnership COURTESY NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The cylinder in the background holds the reactor pressure vessel from opens new Youth Services Center Unit 1 of the San Onofre nuclear power plant. The RPV arrived at Clive on July 22. Center to be a TIM GILLIE Onofre Nuclear Generating EDITOR Station) decommission- A part from a decommis- ing project,” stated Ken ‘hub’ for youth and sioned nuclear power plant in Robuck, president and CEO of San Onofre, San Diego County, EnergySolutions. “We appreci- family services California will rest permanent- ate the thousands of hours over ly in an engineered disposal the course of a three year peri- cell at the EnergySolutions od that our EnergySolutions TIM GILLIE Clive Disposal Facility about 50 employees dedicated to safely EDITOR miles west of Lake Point. transport and dispose of the A collaboration between EnergySolutions announced RPV. We also would like to Tooele County, the state that the reactor pressure vessel thank Emmert International Division of Juvenile Justice from the previously decom- and their crew for their sup- service, and the Tooele School missioned Unit 1 of the San port in the safe execution of District will soon bring a new Onofre Nuclear Generating this project.” service for youth and families Station arrived at their Clive The RPV shipping con- to Tooele City’s Main Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulk Waste Disposal and Treatment Facilities Waste Acceptance Criteria Revision 10
    EnergySolutions Clive, Utah Bulk Waste Disposal and Treatment Facilities Waste Acceptance Criteria Revision 10 (Includes Class A LLRW, Mixed Waste, and 11e.(2) Disposal Embankments) EnergySolutions Clive Facility October 2015 Bulk Waste Disposal and Treatment Facilities Revision 10 Waste Acceptance Criteria TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 SCOPE ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 2 SITE AND FACILITY DESCRIPTION 2.1 SELECTION OF THE CLIVE DISPOSAL SITE LOCATION ................................................... 3 2.2 LICENSES, PERMITS, AND AUTHORIZATIONS................................................................... 3 2.3 SITE LOCATION AND ACCESS .............................................................................................. 4 2.4 DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT FACILITIES .......................................................................... 4 2.5 ALARA CRITERIA FOR THE BULK WASTE AND TREATMENT FACILITIES................... 7 SECTION 3 WASTE CRITERIA 3.1 ACCEPTABLE RADIOACTIVE WASTES ............................................................................. 10 3.1.1 Class A Low-Level Radioactive Waste ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 15.0 Salt Lake City, Utah, Disposal Site 15.1 Compliance Summary
    15.0 Salt Lake City, Utah, Disposal Site 15.1 Compliance Summary The Salt Lake City, Utah, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I Disposal Site was inspected on April 2, 2008. The disposal cell and all associated surface water diversion and drainage structures were in excellent condition and functioning as designed. No change was observed in the three slight depressions found on the disposal cell top; monitoring for settlement will continue. The area that flooded with potentially contaminated non-contact storm water in June 2007—from a breach in the containment berm for the adjacent EnergySolutions Incorporated (EnergySolutions) low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) container pad—was in good condition; no contamination from the release was reported, and the berm had been repaired. No waste debris or indication of windblown or spillover contamination from EnergySolutions adjacent radioactive waste disposal operations was noted. Disposal operations by EnergySolutions adjacent to the Disposal site resulted in damage to the site perimeter fence and the covering of a boundary monument. EnergySolutions subsequently remedied both conditions. No other maintenance needs or cause for a follow-up or contingency inspection were identified. 15.2 Compliance Requirements Requirements for the long-term surveillance and maintenance of the Salt Lake City Disposal Site are specified in the Long-Term Surveillance Plan [LTSP] for the South Clive Disposal Site, Clive, Utah (DOE/AL/62350−228, Rev. 2, U.S. Department of Energy [DOE], Albuquerque Operations Office, September 1997) and in procedures established by DOE to comply with requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 40.27 (10 CFR 40.27).
    [Show full text]
  • IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Applications of Research Reactors No
    IAEA Nuclear Energy Series IAEA Nuclear No. NP-T-5.3 No. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Applications of Research Reactors No. NP-T-5.3 Basic Applications of Principles Research Reactors Objectives Guides Technical Reports INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA ISBN 978–92–0–145010–4 ISSN 1995–7807 13-49091_PUB1627_cover_A4.indd 1,3 2014-02-27 08:47:02 IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES PUBLICATIONS STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES Under the terms of Articles III.A and VIII.C of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on the peaceful uses of atomic energy. The publications in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series provide information in the areas of nuclear power, nuclear fuel cycle, radioactive waste management and decommissioning, and on general issues that are relevant to all of the above mentioned areas. The structure of the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises three levels: 1 — Basic Principles and Objectives; 2 — Guides; and 3 — Technical Reports. The Nuclear Energy Basic Principles publication describes the rationale and vision for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Objectives publications explain the expectations to be met in various areas at different stages of implementation. Nuclear Energy Series Guides provide high level guidance on how to achieve the objectives related to the various topics and areas involving the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Technical Reports provide additional, more detailed information on activities related to the various areas dealt with in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications are coded as follows: NG — general; NP — nuclear power; NF — nuclear fuel; NW — radioactive waste management and decommissioning.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGYSOLUTIONS St1vti-2021-00Q0e1
    Div of Waste Management and Radiation Control JUN 1 7 2021 ENERGYSOLUTIONS St1vti-2021-00q0E1 June 16, 2021 CD-2021-072 Mr. Doug Hansen Director Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880 Subject: EPA ID Number UTD982598898 — Request for a Site-Specific Treatment Variance for Ash with Dioxin/Furan Contamination Dear Mr. Hansen, EnergySolutions hereby requests a variance from Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R315-268- 40(a)(3) for an incinerator ash waste that meets all treatment standards except those for dioxins and furans as Underlying Hazardous Constituents (UHCs). This request is submitted in accordance with the requirements of UAC R315-260-19. The regulatory requirement authorizing this request is found in UAC R315-268-44 which allows a site-specific variance from an applicable treatment standard provided that the following condition is met: UAC R315-268-44268.44(h)(2) It is inappropriate to require the waste to be treated to the level specified in the treatment standard or by the method specified as the treatment standard, even though such treatment is technically possible. EnergySolutions requests approval to receive ash from incinerator and metal recycling processes that contains dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran UHCs above their respective treatment standards denoted with the Universal Treatment Standards (UTS) in R315-268-48. All other required treatment standards associated with the waste will be met prior to disposal. Requiring the waste to meet the dioxin and furan treatment standards is inappropriate based on the processes that generate the waste. Because of the waste generation processes, all of the ash waste contains dioxins and furans; however, in accordance with regulations, only a portion of the waste needs to be treated for those contaminants.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Practice of PET/CT
    EANMEANM® Eu ne rope edici an Association of Nuclear M Publications · Brochures Principles and Practice of PET/CT Part 1 A Technologist‘s Guide Produced with the kind Support of Editors Peter Hogg Giorgio Testanera Head of Diagnostic Imaging Research Istituto Clinico Humanitas University of Salford Department of Nuclear Medicine Salford, UK Rozzano, Italy Contributors Suzanne Dennan Ann Heathcote Department of Diagnostic Imaging Regional Manger St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Alliance Medical Limited Warwick, UK Thomas Kane Consultant in Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Amy Wareing Victoria Hospital, Blackpool Senior PET CT Technologist and Lancashire PETCT Centre, Preston, UK Preston PET CT Centre Royal Preston Hospital Jean-Marc Vrigneaud Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, UK Medical Physicist Nuclear Medicine Department Peter Julyan Centre Georges-François Leclerc Clinical Scientist Dijon, France North Western Medical Physics The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK Sylvianne Prevot Radiation Safety O#cer Katy Szczepura Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc Medical Physics Lecturer Dijon, France Department of Diagnostic Radiography University of Salford Angela Meadows Greater Manchester, UK Unit Manager Preston PET/CT Centre Simona Cola Alliance Medical Technologist of the Department of Nuclear Royal Preston Hospital Medicine Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK S. Maria Nuova Hospital Reggio Emilia, Italy Ronald Boellaard Associate Professor and Head of Physics Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Research VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Contents Foreword Suzanne Dennan . ......................................4 Preface and Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations Peter Hogg and Giorgio Testanera . ..........................5 Chapter 1: The value and limitations of PET-CT in routine clinical practice: a UK radiologist’s perspective Thomas Kane and Peter Hogg .
    [Show full text]
  • 2008/02/25-Comment
    DOCKET NO. 11005711 February 25, 2008 DOCKETED USNRC March 4, 2008 (8:37am) OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Dear Ms or Mr. Secretary, When I read the enclosed material, I felt outrage and despair. Making it possible for Italy or any other country to send its nuclear waste to Utah or any other state in the Union, is preposterous. It's as preposterous as putting EnergySolutions' name on the Delta Center in Salt Lake City. We might as well let Italy also send along its human waste and sewage leaving that country pristine. Let's volunteer Northern Utah to become a black hole. Those well organized and well funded terrorist groups that threaten us can stay home in the Middle East... we'll take care of our own death and destruction, thank you very much. Please, I beg you, put a stop to this nonsense. Now - while you still have the authority to do so. Yours, very sincerely, A Citizen of the United States and Northern Utah -7e mrI0-re, = 60- OLI 3 _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ f~ b . ( 1 v ' fiL S (4 rre VbU Y U i ~l 4 ~44QO'' The proposal by EiergySo- tail•igs were used as building extent of the toxicity was not tions Inc. to accept nuclear ma'erial, incorporated into fully understood. Obviously ~aste froem Italy has become, thE cement poured in founda- we are paying .now for that pardon the pun, a "hot" topic ti•ns.
    [Show full text]