DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuclear Ship Savannah Decommissioning Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Nuclear Ship Savannah Decommissioning Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Photo Credit: MARAD. 1962. Report No. STS-106 March 2008 Prepared for: U.S. DOT Maritime Administration Prepared by: Environmental Engineering Division Volpe National Transportation Systems Center U.S. DOT Research and Innovative Technology Administration REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DA TES COVE RED February 2008 October 2005 – January 2008 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Nuclear Ship Savannah Decommissioning – Final Environmental Assessment 6. AUTHOR(S): MA20 CV616 2 1 2 1 2 Nicole Grewell , Carolyn Junemann , Adam Klauber , Erhard Koehler , Deirdre Morrissey , John Osborne1, Paul Valihura2, Dan Yuska1, Arthur Paynter1 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) REPORT NUMBER US Department of Transportation DOT _VNTSC_MARAD_06-01 Research and Special Programs Administration John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) AGENCY REPORT NUMBER U.S. Department of Transportation STS-106 Maritime Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 1United States Maritime Administration, 2John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) The Maritime Administration owns and maintains the Nuclear Ship Savannah (NSS), the world’s first nuclear powered merchant ship. The NSS was powered by a pressurized water reactor (PWR) that was originally operated from 1962 to 1970, after which it was deactivated, defueled and partially decontaminated in accordance with the best practices of the day. In 2002, the Agency decided to re-evaluate its circa 1975 long-range decommissioning plan. Therefore, a planning process was initiated to determine the preferred end use of the vessel as well as consideration given for the decontamination and disposal of the remaining low-level radioactive material. The Agency has proposed to prepare the NSS for decommissioning, i.e. final nuclear decontamination, and is using the NEPA process to evaluate potential impacts of the alternatives. At this stage of the planning process, MARAD will be conducting an analysis of the proposed decommissioning of the NSS. Therefore, MARAD has decided to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA), in accordance with the requirements of the NEPA, as amended (P.L. 91-190). 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES National Environmental Policy Act, Environmental Assessment, environmental impacts, nuclear 99 ship, decommissioning, nuclear waste 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified Unlimited Pages 2 through 5 Intentionally Blank Pages 2 through 5 Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose and Need for Action ...........................................................................................................10 1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................10 1.2. Background................................................................................................................................10 1.3. Purpose and Need.....................................................................................................................12 1.4. Updates to the Final Environmental Assessment......................................................................12 2.0 Alternatives.......................................................................................................................................13 2.1. DECON Decommissioning Alternative ......................................................................................13 2.1.1 Waste Removal .....................................................................................................................13 2.1.2 Waste Transport....................................................................................................................14 2.1.3 Waste Disposal......................................................................................................................14 2.2. SAFSTOR Decommissioning Alternative ..................................................................................16 2.3. No Action Alternative .................................................................................................................18 2.4. Alternative Initially Considered but Dropped from Further Analysis: ENTOMB Decommissioning Alternative ..................................................................................................................18 2.5. Comparison of the Alternatives .................................................................................................19 3.0 Affected Environment.......................................................................................................................20 3.1. No Action Project Area Description ...........................................................................................20 3.2. Proposed Action Project Area Description ................................................................................20 3.3. Physical and Human Environment ............................................................................................20 3.3.1 Air Quality..............................................................................................................................20 3.3.2 Water Quality.........................................................................................................................21 3.3.3 Vessel Traffic and Navigation Channels ...............................................................................23 3.3.4 Hazardous Materials and Waste Management.....................................................................23 3.3.5 Public Health and Safety .......................................................................................................25 3.3.6 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice.........................................................................25 3.4. Natural and Biological Environment ..........................................................................................26 3.4.1 Coastal Resources ................................................................................................................26 3.4.2 Wildlife and Vegetation..........................................................................................................28 3.5. Other Resources........................................................................................................................30 4.0 EnVironmental Consequences.........................................................................................................31 4.1. Physical and Human Environment ............................................................................................31 4.1.1 Air Quality..............................................................................................................................31 4.1.1.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................31 4.1.1.2 DECON Alternative.......................................................................................................31 4.1.1.3 SAFSTOR Alternative...................................................................................................32 4.1.2 Water Quality.........................................................................................................................32 4.1.2.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................32 4.1.2.2 DECON Alternative.......................................................................................................32 4.1.2.3 SAFSTOR Alternative...................................................................................................33 4.1.3 Vessel Traffic and Navigation Channels ...............................................................................34 4.1.3.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................34 4.1.3.2 DECON Alternative.......................................................................................................34 4.1.3.3 SAFSTOR Alternative...................................................................................................35
Recommended publications
  • ENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. State of UTAH

    ENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. State of UTAH

    Page 1264 Page 1261 Denise Chancellor, Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Shurtleff, Utah Attorney General, and Fred G. 625 F.3d 1261 (10th Cir. 2010) Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, with her on the briefs), Office of the Utah Attorney General, Salt Lake ENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant State of Utah. v. Barbara J.B. Green, Sullivan Green Seavy, LLC, Boulder, CO (James S. Lowrie, Lewis M. Francis, and State of UTAH, Defendant-Appellant, Ryan M. Harris, Jones Waldo Holbrook & McDonough PC, Salt Lake City, UT, and Richard L. Masters, Masters, Rocky Mountain Low-Level Radioactive Waste Mullins & Arrington, Louisville, KY, with her on the Compact, Defendant-Intervenor. briefs), for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant Rocky EnergySolutions, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, Mountain Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact. v. Kristen K. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General (Robert M. McKenna, Attorney General, and Alice M. Rocky Mountain Low-Level Radioactive Waste Blado, Assistant Attorney General, with her on the Compact, Defendant-Appellant. briefs), Office of the Washington Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for Defendants-Appellants Northwest EnergySolutions, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, Interstate Compact on Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management and Michael Garner, solely as its Executive v. Director. Northwest Interstate Compact on Low-Level Michael S. Lee, Howrey LLP (Jared C. Fields, Radioactive Waste Management, and Michael Howrey LLP, and Robert S. Clark and Timothy B. Smith, Garner, solely in his official capacity as the Executive Parr Brown Gee & Loveless with him on the brief), Salt Director of the Northwest Interstate Compact on Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management, Defendants-Appellants, Gary K.
  • High Activity Filter Dispositioning

    High Activity Filter Dispositioning

    High Activity Filter Dispositioning EnergySolutions and WMG have joined forces to create FilterSolutions™, a complete service combining industry-leading characterization expertise, packaging efficiency (FLTRSTOR™ System), e-Shipper™, cask transportation, high activity filter processing, and disposal capabilities. WMG’s FLTRSTOR™ System™ is made up The FilterSolutions™ processing facility at of filter racks and an integrated open-top EnergySolutions’ Bear Creek Operations container, optimizing the number of filters in Tennessee is able to perform remote, FLTRSTOR™ System that can be loaded in each shipment, while sophisticated, and ALARA sorting, segregation, reducing worker dose by limiting the number volume reduction, and/or encapsulation of of lifting evolutions required to load the filters. filters. In addition to the processing of filters EnergySolutions’ robust transportation and these services can be extended to soil, sludge, cask fleet further streamlines the process. and legacy “problem liners.” RADMAN™ data transfer authorization The final wasteform is sent to EnergySolutions’ provides a seamless transition for shipping, Clive facility in Utah for permanent disposal as processing, and/or disposal, allowing Class A waste. FilterSolutions to: (1) access legacy filter data, (2) re-characterize filters pre- and Call your EnergySolutions representative or post-processing, (3) assist in creating the visit our website for additional information on most efficient packaging plan, and (4) provide how this innovative, turnkey service can
  • Days Numbered for Clamagore Sub at Patriots Point

    Days Numbered for Clamagore Sub at Patriots Point

    Days numbered for Clamagore sub at Patriots Point Ashley Heffernan Jan 31, 2017 The USS Clamagore submarine was decommissioned in 1975 after 30 years of service. (Photo/Ashley Heffernan) The only Guppy III submarine in the United States open for museum tours may become an artificial reef off the Florida coast. For now, the USS Clamagore, a more-than-320-foot submarine that was decommissioned in 1975 after 30 years of service during the Cold War, is rusting in Charleston Harbor at Patriots Point. The price of admission at Patriots Point includes a tour of the submarine, but Executive Director Mac Burdette estimates that only 25% of visitors do so. Instead, most visitors go to the sub’s much larger neighbors, the USS Yorktown aircraft carrier and USS Laffey destroyer. Patriots Point doesn’t have the estimated $6 million it would take to renovate and restore the Clamagore, and, if it did, the return would likely not be worth the investment, Burdette said. ―If we had $6 million sitting in an account somewhere that wasn’t obligated, I can tell you right now, I would be recommending to the board that we spend that money on the Yorktown because that’s what sells the tickets here,‖ he said. The Patriots Point Development Authority board voted last year to give Artificial Reefs International – USS Clamagore, a subsidiary of Miami-based CRB Geological and Environmental Services Inc., exclusive rights to convert the Clamagore into an artificial reef. On Jan. 10, the company secured 25% of the $4 million needed to make that happen.
  • Fort Sumter National Monument Visitor Study

    Fort Sumter National Monument Visitor Study

    Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Fort Sumter National Monument Visitor Study 2 Fort Sumter National Monument Visitor Study OMB Approval: #1024-0224 (NPS #05-029) Expiration Date: 01/31/2006 United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Fort Sumter National Monument 1214 Middle Street Sullivan's Island, SC 29482 IN REPLY REFER TO: July 2005 Dear Visitor: Thank you for participating in this important study. Our goal is to learn about the expectations, opinions, and interests of visitors to Fort Sumter National Monument. This information will assist us in managing this site and serving you, our visitor. This questionnaire is only being given to a select number of visitors, so your participation is very important! It should only take about 20 minutes after your visit to complete. When your visit is over, please complete the questionnaire. Seal it with the stickers provided on the last page and drop it in any U.S. mailbox. If you have any questions, please contact Margaret Littlejohn, NPS VSP Coordinator, Park Studies Unit, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, P.O. Box 441139, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1139, phone 208-885-7863, email: [email protected]. We appreciate your help. Sincerely, John Tucker Superintendent Fort Sumter National Monument Visitor Study 3 DIRECTIONS One person, at least 16 years of age, in your personal group should complete the questionnaire. It should take about 20 minutes. When you have completed the questionnaire, please seal it with the stickers provided and drop it in any U.S.
  • Laffey News the Uss Laffey Dd-724 – the Ship That Would Not Die

    Laffey News the Uss Laffey Dd-724 – the Ship That Would Not Die

    2014 REUNION REGISTRATION – SEE DETAILS INSIDE – Y’ALL ATTEND! LAFFEY NEWS THE USS LAFFEY DD-724 – THE SHIP THAT WOULD NOT DIE “I’LL NEVER ABANDON SHIP AS LONG AS A GUN WILL FIRE”: CO F. JULIAN BECTON Dedicated to those who served in Battle…and those that Preserved in Peace _________________________________________________________________________________________ July-August-September www.laffey.org___________________________ _2014 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE lunch at the new restaurant next to Patriots Point. We had around 20 attendees from the Association. FALL - 2014 The whole luncheon was donated by Pat Waters who happens to be the grandson of General I want everyone to know that Ari Phoutrides is now George S. Patton. We want to extend many thanks the hero of D-Day 1945. The D-Day celebration to Pat for the delicious meal. We hope to see Pat was held on June 6, 2014 at Patriots Point. Ari and and his wife Marsha at the reunion dinner. Lee Hunt were there to represent some of the survivors of the invasion of Normandy, France. Patriots Point treated us to dinner aboard the Yorktown after the seminar. Thanks to Mac for the Lee was there during the day and had a great time. treat. Our friend Jeff Jacobs of the Patriots Point However, this wore him out and he went home Foundation brought the new plaque to the luncheon early and could not attend the seminar in the for a sneak preview. It’s really beautiful and it will evening. Ari was there to represent the USS Laffey be a real tribute to the 32 men killed at Okinawa.
  • Patriots Point Development Authority

    Patriots Point Development Authority

    PATRIOTS POINT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013 State of South Carolina Office of the State Auditor 1401 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1200 COLUMBIA, S.C. 29201 RICHARD H. GILBERT, JR., CPA (803) 253-4160 DEPUTY STATE AUDITOR FAX (803) 343-0723 September 24, 2014 The Honorable Nikki R. Haley, Governor and Members of the Authority Patriots Point Development Authority Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina This report on the audit of the financial statements of the Patriots Point Development Authority for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, was issued by Greene, Finney & Horton, LLP, Certified Public Accountants, under contract with the South Carolina Office of the State Auditor. If you have any questions regarding this report, please let us know. Respectfully submitted, Richard H. Gilbert, Jr., CPA Deputy State Auditor RHGjr/cwc PATRIOTS POINT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA TABLE OF CONTENTS YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis 3 Basic Financial Statements: Statements of Net Position - Enterprise Fund 9 Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position - Enterprise Fund 10 Statements of Cash Flows - Enterprise Fund 11 Notes to the Financial Statements 12 COMPLIANCE SECTION Independent Auditor's Report - Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with
  • N.S. Savannah Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    N.S. Savannah Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    MARITIME HERITAGE OF THE UNITED STATES NHL THEME STUDY—LARGE VESSELS NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 N.s. savannah Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: N.S. Savannah Other Name/Site Number: Savannah 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 40 Patriot's Point Road Not for publication: N/A City/Town: Mt. Pleasant Vicinity:___ State: SC County: Charleston Code: 19 Zip Code: 29464 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private:__ Building(s):__ Public-local:__ District:__ Public-State:__ Site:__ Public-Federal: X Structure: X Obj ect:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing ____ buildings ____ sites 0 structures ____ objects 0 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of related multiple property listing: NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 N.S. Savannah Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
  • USS CLAMAGORE (SS-343) Was on a Training Cruise Off Panama

    USS CLAMAGORE (SS-343) Was on a Training Cruise Off Panama

    Shipyard Specification Package __________________________________________________ U.S.S. CLAMAGORE (SS-343) Joseph Lombardi Ocean Technical Services, LLC. Marine Surveyor & Consultant 10 Washington Street Manchester, Massachusetts 01944 Member SAMS, ABYC, HNSA & SNAME Hull Survey __________________________________________________ U.S.S. CLAMAGORE (SS-343) Joseph Lombardi Ocean Technical Services, LLC. Marine Surveyor & Consultant 10 Washington Street Manchester, Massachusetts 01944 Member SAMS, ABYC, HNSA & SNAME TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Vessel History 5 II. The Basic Structure of Naval Submarines 10 III. Preamble 17 IV. Vessel Data 18 V. Hull – Exterior 26 VI. Hull – Interior 41 VII. Electronics, Ventilation, Firefighting, Maintenance Plan 63 VIII. Supplemental Recommendations 64 IX. Summary 67 Member SAMS, ABYC, HNSA & SNAME JOSEPH W. LOMBARDI Marine Surveyor & Consultant OCEAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC. ________________________________________________________________________ P.O. Box 1576, Manchester, Massachusetts 01944 Office (978)-526-1894 Fax (978)-526-8390 Vessel Survey Report No. 2344 Vessel surveyed at: Berth Site, Patriot’s Point Museum, Mt. Pleasant, SC Dates of survey: 19 - 28 April 2008 Vessel surveyed: U.S.S. CLAMAGORE (SS - 343) Survey commissioned by: Mr. Bob Howard Patriots Point Naval & Maritime Museum 40 Patriots Point Road Office 843-881-5978 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Fax 843-881-5979 Purpose of survey: Structural Survey ________________________________________________________________________ DISCUSSION The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), American Boat & Yacht Council (ABYC), International Marine Organization (IMO), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME) are utilized in compiling this report; individual reference to subchapters of the above is not made within the body of this report. Other sources include the 'U.S. Navy Towing Manual', Naval Sea Systems Command, 'Manual on Ship Construction’, George C.
  • Energysolutions, Inc. ( ES ) 423 WEST 300 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84101 801−649−2000

    Energysolutions, Inc. ( ES ) 423 WEST 300 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84101 801−649−2000

    EnergySolutions, Inc. ( ES ) 423 WEST 300 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84101 801−649−2000 www.energysolutions.com 10−K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filed on 3/28/2008 Filed Period 12/31/2007 Use these links to rapidly review the document ENERGY SOLUTIONS , INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10−K For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 Energy Solutions , Inc. Index to Consolidated Financial Statements Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10−K (Mark One) ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 001−33830 EnergySolutions, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 51−0653027 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 423 West 300 South, Suite 200 84101 Salt Lake City, Utah (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (801) 649−2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Class Name of Exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share The New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well−known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
  • Dwmrc-03 Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control Radioactive Material License

    Dwmrc-03 Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control Radioactive Material License

    DWMRC-03 UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RADIATION CONTROL RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LICENSE Pursuant to the Utah Code Annotated (UCA), Title 19, Chapter 3 and R313 of the Utah Administrative Code and in reliance on statements and representations heretofore made by the Licensee designated below, a license is hereby issued authorizing such Licensee to transfer, receive, possess and use the radioactive material designated below; and to use such radioactive material for the purpose(s) and at the place(s) designated below. This Licensee is subject to all applicable rules, and orders now or hereafter in effect and to any conditions specified below. *********************************************************************************************** LICENSEE ) 3. License Number: UT 2300478 ) Amendment #0 1. Name EnergySolutions, LLC ) *********************************************** ) 4. Expiration Date 2. Address 299 S. Main St., Suite 1700 ) November 13, 2027 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 ) *********************************************** ) 5. License Category 2-c ********************************************************************************************** 6. Radioactive material 7. Chemical and/or 8. Maximum quantity (element and mass physical form Licensee may possess at number) any one time 11e.(2) Byproduct Packaged or Bulk 5,048,965 Cubic Yards Material Radioactive Waste ********************************************************************************************** SECTION 9.0. ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONS 9.1 All notices to the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control required under this license shall be addressed to the Director of the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (Director), Department of Environmental Quality, 195 North 1950 West, P.O. Box 144880, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880. 9.2 Authorized place for use shall be the Licensee’s facility located in Section 32 of Township 1 S, Range 11 W, Tooele County, Utah, near Clive.

  • 7-30-20 Transcript Bulletin

    TOOELETRANSCRIPT S T C BULLETIN S THURSDAY July 30, 2020 www.TooeleOnline.com Vol. 127 No. 18 $1.00 Nuclear power plant component reaches Clive 670-ton cylindrical steel vessel will stay at EnergySolutions’ Clive facility TIM GILLIE/TTB PHOTO Brett Peterson, director Division of Juvenile Justice Services; Donovan Bergstrom, program director Office of Youth Services, and Trina Dickinson, assistant program director for Salt Lake Valley Youth Centers (including Tooele and Summit counties) in the recreation room of the Tooele County Youth Center on July 29, 2020. Under an agreement with Tooele County, DJSS will provide staff and funding for the youth center’s operations. County, schools, state partnership COURTESY NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The cylinder in the background holds the reactor pressure vessel from opens new Youth Services Center Unit 1 of the San Onofre nuclear power plant. The RPV arrived at Clive on July 22. Center to be a TIM GILLIE Onofre Nuclear Generating EDITOR Station) decommission- A part from a decommis- ing project,” stated Ken ‘hub’ for youth and sioned nuclear power plant in Robuck, president and CEO of San Onofre, San Diego County, EnergySolutions. “We appreci- family services California will rest permanent- ate the thousands of hours over ly in an engineered disposal the course of a three year peri- cell at the EnergySolutions od that our EnergySolutions TIM GILLIE Clive Disposal Facility about 50 employees dedicated to safely EDITOR miles west of Lake Point. transport and dispose of the A collaboration between EnergySolutions announced RPV. We also would like to Tooele County, the state that the reactor pressure vessel thank Emmert International Division of Juvenile Justice from the previously decom- and their crew for their sup- service, and the Tooele School missioned Unit 1 of the San port in the safe execution of District will soon bring a new Onofre Nuclear Generating this project.” service for youth and families Station arrived at their Clive The RPV shipping con- to Tooele City’s Main Street.
  • Bulk Waste Disposal and Treatment Facilities Waste Acceptance Criteria Revision 10

    Bulk Waste Disposal and Treatment Facilities Waste Acceptance Criteria Revision 10

    EnergySolutions Clive, Utah Bulk Waste Disposal and Treatment Facilities Waste Acceptance Criteria Revision 10 (Includes Class A LLRW, Mixed Waste, and 11e.(2) Disposal Embankments) EnergySolutions Clive Facility October 2015 Bulk Waste Disposal and Treatment Facilities Revision 10 Waste Acceptance Criteria TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 SCOPE ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 2 SITE AND FACILITY DESCRIPTION 2.1 SELECTION OF THE CLIVE DISPOSAL SITE LOCATION ................................................... 3 2.2 LICENSES, PERMITS, AND AUTHORIZATIONS................................................................... 3 2.3 SITE LOCATION AND ACCESS .............................................................................................. 4 2.4 DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT FACILITIES .......................................................................... 4 2.5 ALARA CRITERIA FOR THE BULK WASTE AND TREATMENT FACILITIES................... 7 SECTION 3 WASTE CRITERIA 3.1 ACCEPTABLE RADIOACTIVE WASTES ............................................................................. 10 3.1.1 Class A Low-Level Radioactive Waste ........................................................................