Distribution, Habitat Use, and Behaviour of Cetaceans in the Greater Dyer Island Area, Western Cape, South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distribution, Habitat Use, and Behaviour of Cetaceans in the Greater Dyer Island Area, Western Cape, South Africa Distribution, habitat use, and behaviour of cetaceans in the Greater Dyer Island Area, Western Cape, South Africa BY KATJA VINDING PETERSEN Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Zoolog) In the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria © University of Pretoria © University of Pretoria June 2016 Supervisor Doctor Simon Elwen Co-supervisor Professor Marthán Bester I, Katja Vinding Petersen declare that the thesis/dissertation, which I hereby submit for the degree Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Pretoria, is my own work and has not previously been submitted by me for a degree at this or any other tertiary institution. 21. June 2016 © University of Pretoria Table of contents SUMMARY 7 3 CETACEAN DATA COLLECTION FROM COMMERCIAL FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 11 WHALE WATCHING VEssELS: CONSISTENCY, VALIDITY, LIST OF FUNDING SOURCES 16 AND VALUE IN LOCAL HABITAT MONITORING 83 ABBREVIATIONS 17 3.1 Abstract 83 3.2 Key words 83 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 19 3.3 Introduction 84 1.1 Cetaceans 19 3.4 Materials and methods 85 1.2 Aim and motivation of the study 20 3.4.1 Study area 85 1.3 Research area 21 3.4.2 Data 86 1.3.1 Greater Dyer Island Area 21 3.4.3 Data analysis 86 1.3.2 Potential human impacts 23 3.5 Results 92 1.3.3 Protection status 25 3.5.1 Consistency 92 1.4 Research design and methods 28 3.5.2 Validity 94 1.4.1 Platforms of opportunity (Whale watching) 28 3.6 Discussion 97 1.4.2 Land-based observations (Theodolite tracking) 28 3.6.2 Effort 100 1.4.3 Passive Acoustic Monitoring 31 3.6.3 Observer skills and training 100 1.5 Coastal cetacean species 34 3.6.4 Platform of opportunity or random 1.5.1 Right whales 34 pointless observations? 101 1.5.2 Humpback whales 37 3.6.5 World-wide guidelines 102 1.5.3 Bryde’s whales 38 3.7 Conclusion 103 1.5.4 Indian Ocean humpback dolphins 38 3.8 Literature 104 1.5.5 Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins 40 1.6 Organisation of the report 40 4 SHORE-BASED OBSERVATIONS OF FIVE CETACEAN 1.7 Literature 42 SPECIES IN THE GREATER DYER ISLAND AREA, SOUTH AFRICA: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, 2 THE USE OF DATA FROM A PLATFORM OF OPPORTUNITY SEASONALITY, AND GROUP COMPOSITION 107 (WHALE WATCHING) TO STUDY COASTAL CETACEANS 4.1 Abstract 107 ON THE SOUTH WEST COAST OF SOUTH AFRICA 53 4.2 Key words 108 2.1 Abstract 53 4.3 Introduction 108 2.2 Key words 53 4.4 Methods 109 2.3 Introduction 53 4.4.1 Study site 109 2.4 The study 55 4.4.2 Shore-based stations 110 2.4.1 Study area 55 4.5 Data collection 112 2.4.2 Data collection and validation 56 4.5.1 Shore-based stations 112 2.4.3 Data analysis 58 4.5.2 Data collection protocols 113 2.5 Results 59 4.5.3 Environmental data and sighting conditions 114 2.5.1 Search effort 59 4.5.4 Distribution scan 114 2.5.2 Cetacean occurrence and seasonal distribution 60 4.5.5 Focal follows or search mode 114 2.5.3 Temporal patterns 62 4.5.6 Surface behaviour in whales 117 2.5.4 Spatial patterns 66 4.5.7 Surface behaviour in dolphins 117 2.5.5 Observed on rare occasions 70 4.6 Analysis 117 2.6 Discussion 71 4.6.1 Effort 117 2.6.1 Seasonality and distribution of cetacean species 71 4.6.2 Data preparation and filtering 117 2.6.2 Caveats and recommendations 72 4.6.3 Comparison between WWV-data 2.7 Conclusion 75 and theodolite observations 121 2.8 Acknowledgements 75 4.7 Results 121 2.9 Literature 78 4.7.1 Effort 121 4.7.2 Temporal distribution patterns of cetacean species 125 4.7.3 Spatial distribution 125 4 © University of Pretoria 4.7.4 Behaviour 132 6 CONCLUDING REMARKS 183 4.7.5 Focal follows 137 6.1 Distribution, habitat use, and behaviour 183 4.7.6 Comparison between WWV-data 6.2 PAM 183 and theodolite sightings 140 6.3 Platforms of opportunity 185 4.8 Discussion 141 6.4 Conservation and management 186 4.8.1 Seasonality and distribution of cetacean species 141 6.5 Literature 187 4.8.2 Southern right whales 141 4.8.3 Humpback whales 142 7 APPENDIX 1 191 4.8.4 Bryde’s whales 143 7.1 The use of data from a platform of opportunity 4.8.5 Inshore dolphin species 143 (whale watching) to study coastal cetaceans on 4.8.6 Bias 144 the south west coast of South Africa 191 4.8.7 Inherent inaccuracy 144 4.8.8 Comparison between WWV-data 8 APPENDIX 2 214 and theodolite sightings 146 8.1 Data collection from commercial whale 4.9 Conclusions 146 watching vessel: the need for international 4.10 Acknowledgement 146 guidelines and systematic quality control 214 4.11 Literature 148 9 APPENDIX 3 221 5 PAssIVE ACOUSTIC MONITORING OF 9.1 Occurrence of vagrant leopard seals, SOUTHERN RIGHT WHALES 153 Hydrurga leptonyx, along the South African coast 221 5.1 Abstract 153 5.2 Key words 154 10 APPENDIX 4 225 5.3 Introduction 154 10.1 Possible non-offspring nursing in the 5.4 Methods 155 southern right whale, Eubalaena australis 225 5.4.1 Study site 155 5.4.2 Study setup 156 11 APPENDIX 5 238 5.4.3 Passive acoustic monitoring 157 11.1 Poster presentations 238 5.4.4 Land-based theodolite tracking 160 5.5 Data analysis 161 5.5.1 Passive acoustic monitoring 161 5.5.2 Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) 164 5.5.3 Humpback whale vocalisations 164 5.5.4 Linking Acoustic and Visual data 165 5.6 Results 165 5.6.1 Passive acoustic monitoring 165 5.6.2 Southern right whale call analysis 168 5.6.3 Humpback whale call analysis 168 5.6.4 Land-based theodolite tracking 169 5.6.5 Passive acoustic monitoring & land-based theodolite tracking 174 5.7 Discussion 174 5.7.1 Passive acoustic monitoring 174 5.7.2 Bias and considerations 177 5.8 Conclusion 177 5.9 Acknowledgement 177 5.10 Literature 179 5 © University of Pretoria Southern right whale in question. PHOTO CREDIT KATJA VINDING PETERSEN 6 © University of Pretoria Summary This thesis is a study of the occurrence, behaviour, spatial distribution, and temporal distri- bution of cetaceans in the Greater Dyer Island area, Western Cape, South Africa. Three main methods were used in the study: Analysis of data from a local whale-watching vessel (WWV) (2000 – 2012), visual land-based theodolite tracking (during four southern right whale seasons (August – December) from 2011 – 2014 and one summer/autumn season in 2013), and passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) using a single bottom moored hydrophone (DSG-Ocean Loggerhead) in the months of January/February, September, and October, 2014). Methods were chosen, due to suitability, cost efficiency, and because they complement each other. Data from the WWV covered more than a ten-year period and provided indications of temporal and spatial distribution trends, but data were limited with respect to survey effort and behavioural data. Shore-based observations provided spatial, temporal, and behaviour patterns of the cetacean species in the area, but the method is labour intensive, requires daylight and is restricted by weather conditions. PAM could be conducted 24 hours a day and in poor weather conditions and enabled a temporal extension of the monitoring of cetaceans in the area, but individual hydrophones, are expensive and can break down or be lost. Simultaneous visual observations and PAM were used to investigate the vocalisation patterns of southern right whales and the possibility of using PAM to monitor presence of southern right whales. An analysis of the consistency and validity of the opportunistic data from the WWV was con- ducted before the data was used in a spatial and temporal analysis. The Consistency Index (CI) was defined as the proportion of times a data field was recorded per total number of trips during all years. The validity of the data were assessed to determine accuracy of the data. The validity and consistency analysis of the sighting records revealed that the dataset was useful but data fields varied considerably in their consistency of collection. The trip duration and route was recorded in less than 5% of cases, making analysis of temporal and spatial patterns difficult. The validity of species identification was excellent with 100% agreement between observer records and photographic documentation in 152 encounters of seven cetacean species. Behavioural data were described in overly subjective terms, thus not allowing for any analysis of patterns. The analysis also resulted in a list of suggestions for the design of future observa- tion sheets, and data collection methods and the development and implementation of world- wide standards are encouraged (guidelines and protocols), which should address different levels and scenarios of data collection from WWV. This work has made a novel contribution to the global research field by submission of a paper and direct communication with the whale watch- ing subcommittee at the International Whaling Commission (IWC) concerning content in the International guidelines for “platform of opportunity guiding principles on data collection”. An analysis of opportunistic cetacean sightings from the local WWV consisted of more than 5500 cetacean encounters during more than 2500 trips from 2003 to 2012.
Recommended publications
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans Robert W. BOESSENECKER Department of Geology, University of Otago, 360 Leith Walk, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054 (New Zealand) and Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University 200 Traphagen Hall, Bozeman, MT, 59715 (USA) and University of California Museum of Paleontology 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA, 94720 (USA) [email protected] Boessenecker R. W. 2013. — A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans. Geodiversitas 35 (4): 815-940. http://dx.doi.org/g2013n4a5 ABSTRACT e newly discovered Upper Miocene to Upper Pliocene San Gregorio assem- blage of the Purisima Formation in Central California has yielded a diverse collection of 34 marine vertebrate taxa, including eight sharks, two bony fish, three marine birds (described in a previous study), and 21 marine mammals. Pinnipeds include the walrus Dusignathus sp., cf. D. seftoni, the fur seal Cal- lorhinus sp., cf. C. gilmorei, and indeterminate otariid bones. Baleen whales include dwarf mysticetes (Herpetocetus bramblei Whitmore & Barnes, 2008, Herpetocetus sp.), two right whales (cf. Eubalaena sp. 1, cf. Eubalaena sp. 2), at least three balaenopterids (“Balaenoptera” cortesi “var.” portisi Sacco, 1890, cf. Balaenoptera, Balaenopteridae gen. et sp. indet.) and a new species of rorqual (Balaenoptera bertae n. sp.) that exhibits a number of derived features that place it within the genus Balaenoptera. is new species of Balaenoptera is relatively small (estimated 61 cm bizygomatic width) and exhibits a comparatively nar- row vertex, an obliquely (but precipitously) sloping frontal adjacent to vertex, anteriorly directed and short zygomatic processes, and squamosal creases.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammal Conservation from Local to Global
    MARINE MAMMAL CONSERVATION FROM LOCAL TO GLOBAL 29TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CETACEAN SOCIETY 23rd to 25th March, 2015 Intercontinental Hotel, St Julian’s Bay, MALTA USEFUL INFORMATION VENUE – INTERCONTIMENTAL MALTA HOTEL, ST JULIANS Conference Hall, Cettina De Cesare (CDC), is in hotel. Paranga Beach Club is on the water edge in St George’s Bay. 29th ECS Conference, Malta i USEFUL INFORMATION CONTACT NUMBERS Direct Dialling Code for Malta: +356 International Code (to make an overseas call): 00 Emergency number: 112 Police: 21 22 40 01 … 21 22 40 07 Mater-Dei Hospital (Malta): 25 45 00 00 Malta International Airport (General Inquiries): 21 24 96 00 Malta International Airport (Flight Information): 52 30 20 00 (each call: € 1.00) Passport Office: 21 22 22 86 WEBSITES Malta International Airport (note one ‘a’ between Malta and Airport!) Malta’s weather www.maltairport.com/weather Arrivals www.maltairport.com/arrivals Departures www.maltairport.com/departures Activities in Malta www.visitmalta.com 29th ECS Conference, Malta ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS HOSTED BY The Biological Conservation Research Foundation (BICREF) The NGO BICREF was set-up in 1998 to promote conservation research and awareness in Malta. For this purpose it welcomes Internships in Malta; the next call starts immediately after the ECS conference 2015 and to last till the end of summer 2015. Options for taking up courses or training in marine conservation biology, cetacean and fisheries research are also possible. Dr. Adriana Vella, Ph.D (Cantab.), founder of BICREF, is a conservation biologist with experience in mammal and marine conservation research at local and regional level.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the United Nations Conference To
    A/CONF.230/14 Report of the United Nations Conference to Support the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development United Nations Headquarters 5-9 June 2017 United Nations New York, 2017 Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. [15 June 2017] Contents Chapter Page I. Resolutions adopted by the Conference ............................................. 5 II. Organization of work and other organizational matters ................................ 11 A. Date and venue of the Conference ............................................. 11 B. Attendance ................................................................ 11 C. Opening of the Conference................................................... 12 D. Election of the two Presidents and other officers of the Conference ................. 13 E. Adoption of the rules of procedure ............................................ 13 F. Adoption of the agenda of the Conference ...................................... 13 G. Organization of work, including the establishment of subsidiary bodies, and other organizational matters ....................................................... 14 H. Credentials of representatives to the Conference ................................. 14 I. Documentation ............................................................ 14 III. General debate ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Extrapolating Cetacean Densities Beyond Surveyed Regions: Habitat
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2015) 42, 1267–1280 ORIGINAL Extrapolating cetacean densities beyond ARTICLE surveyed regions: habitat-based predictions in the circumtropical belt Laura Mannocci1*, Pascal Monestiez1,2,Jerome^ Spitz3,4 and Vincent Ridoux1,3 1Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chize et La ABSTRACT Rochelle, UMR 7372 Universite de La Aim Our knowledge of cetacean distributions is impeded by large data-gaps Rochelle-CNRS, La Rochelle F-17000, France, 2 worldwide, particularly at tropical latitudes. This study aims to (1) find generic INRA, UR0546, Unite Biostatistiques et Processus Spatiaux, Domaine Saint-Paul relationships between cetaceans and their habitats in a range of tropical waters, 84914, Avignon, France, 3Observatoire and (2) extrapolate cetacean densities in a circumtropical belt extending far PELAGIS, UMS 3462 Universite de La beyond surveyed regions. Rochelle-CNRS, Systemes d’Observation pour Location Pelagic, circumtropical. la Conservation des Mammiferes et des Oiseaux Marins, La Rochelle 17000, France, Methods Aerial surveys were conducted over three regions in the tropical 2 2 2 4Marine Mammal Research Unit, Fisheries Atlantic (132,000 km ), Indian (1.4 million km ) and Pacific (1.4 million km ) Center, University of British Columbia, oceans. Three cetacean guilds were studied (Delphininae, Globicephalinae and Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, sperm and beaked whales). For each guild, a generalized additive model was Canada fitted using sightings recorded in all three regions and 14 candidate environ- mental predictors. Cetacean densities were tentatively extrapolated over a cir- cumtropical belt, excluding waters where environmental characteristics departed from those encountered in the surveyed regions. Results Each cetacean guild exhibited a relationship with the primary produc- tion and depth of the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Ocean Commission- Media Coverage (15 Oct.-15 Nov.)
    Global Ocean Commission- media coverage (15 Oct.-15 Nov.) Articles by, or mentioning, Global Ocean Commissioners: The high cost of ocean decline – Andrés Velasco in Business World Online (and others) via Project Syndicate, 15 Oct (Page 3) 海洋退化的沉重代价 (as above in Chinese) – Caijing.com, 18 Oct – NB this article was also published in other major languages La urgencia de proteger el Océano, una creciente demanda social. Cristina Narbona in El Huffington Post, 22 Oct. The Urgency of Protecting the Ocean: A Social Demand. Cristina Narbona in The Huffington Post Green, 22 Oct. (Page 3) Survey Reveals Support for Single Global Governance of Oceans. The Fish Site, 22 Oct. (Page 6) G20 must deal with climate change says former Canadian PM. Paul Martin in ABC, 29 Oct. (Page 8) Environmental concerns discussed with Global Ocean Commission – Foua Toloa in Samoa News, 05 Nov (Page 10) [論点]海の恵みを次世代に 公海ガバナンス強化を…川口順子氏 – Yoriko Kawaguchi in Yomiuri Shimbun, 08 Nov IMPAC3 stories: Comienza el III Congreso sobre Areas Marinas Protegidas. ABC Natural, 21 Oct. Bold Plan for 50 Ocean Hope Spots Announced at IMPAC 3, National Geographic, 22 Oct. (Page 12) Aires marines : la gestion de la haute mer en question au congrès international Impac 3 à Marseille. Le Marin, 23 Oct. Marine Protected Areas: Pitcairn’s Bounty. The Chicago Tribune, 24 Oct. (Page 14) A Ajaccio, une vingtaine de pays appellent à préserver d'urgence la biodiversité marine. Le Monde, 27 Oct. Andaman & Nicobar, Lakshadweep declared new ‘hope spot’ The Economic Times (India Times), 28 Oct. (Page 15) Other articles mentioning the Global Ocean Commission, or related to its work: Des chercheurs appellent à la fin des subventions sur les chalutiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Systematics of South American Dolphins Sotalia: Sister
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46 (2008) 252–268 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular systematics of South American dolphins Sotalia: Sister taxa determination and phylogenetic relationships, with insights into a multi-locus phylogeny of the Delphinidae Susana Caballero a,*, Jennifer Jackson a,g, Antonio A. Mignucci-Giannoni b, He´ctor Barrios-Garrido c, Sandra Beltra´n-Pedreros d, Marı´a G. Montiel-Villalobos e, Kelly M. Robertson f, C. Scott Baker a,g a Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand b Red Cariben˜a de Varamientos, Caribbean Stranding Network, PO Box 361715, San Juan 00936-1715, Puerto Rico c Laboratorio de Ecologı´a General, Facultad Experimental de Ciencias. Universidad del Zulia, Av. Universidad con prolongacio´n Av. 5 de Julio. Sector Grano de Oro, Maracaibo, Venezuela d Laboratorio de Zoologia, Colecao Zoologica Paulo Burheim, Centro Universitario Luterano de Manaus, Manaus, Brazil e Laboratorio de Ecologı´a y Gene´tica de Poblaciones, Centro de Ecologı´a, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas (IVIC), San Antonio de los Altos, Carretera Panamericana km 11, Altos de Pipe, Estado Miranda, Venezuela f Tissue and DNA Archive, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037-1508, USA g Marine Mammal Institute and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, 2030 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365, USA Received 2 May 2007; revised 19 September 2007; accepted 17 October 2007 Available online 25 October 2007 Abstract The evolutionary relationships among members of the cetacean family Delphinidae, the dolphins, pilot whales and killer whales, are still not well understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Photo-Identification of Melon-Headed Whales (Peponocephala Electra) in the Marquesas Islands: Creation of the First Photo-Identification Catalog and Estimation of Group Size and Minimum
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF John Ralph McClung II for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife Science presented on March 9, 2017. Title: Photo-identification of Melon-headed Whales (Peponocephala electra) in the Marquesas Islands: Creation of the First Photo-identification Catalog and Estimation of Group Size and Minimum Abundance in a Remote Archipelago Abstract approved: ________________________________________________________ C. Scott Baker For many species of oceanic dolphins, photo-identification and genetic data indicate that these island-associated populations are demographically isolated from pelagic populations and that island-associated populations exhibit very different patterns of movement and habitat use. Melon-headed whales (Peponocephala electra) are generally considered a pelagic dolphin, but have been documented around oceanic islands where deep water occurs close to shore. In the main Hawaiian Islands, for example, analysis of ten years of photo-identification data shows that melon-headed whales form a relatively small and apparently isolated population. Melon-headed whales have also been documented around several islands in the Marquesas archipelago of French Polynesia, but no information on their population structure in the islands exists. To better understand this population of melon-headed whale, I analyzed over 6,000 photographs collected during Expedition Marquesas, a series of small-boat sampling surveys conducted around six islands – Hiva Oa, Tahuata, Mohotani, Ua Huka, Ua Pou and Nuku Hiva – in March and April of 2012. Photographs and biopsy samples were collected during 14 encounters with melon-headed whales at four of the islands; Mohotani, Ua Huka, Ua Pou, and Nuku Hiva. In this thesis, I compiled the first photo-identification catalog for melon-headed whales in the islands by analyzing photographs to identify individual dolphins based on distinctive markings to their dorsal fins (referred to as distinctively marked individuals or DMIs).
    [Show full text]
  • Download 15 March 2014)
    References of Scientific Descriptions Abel/Owen References of Scientific Descriptions Abel (1905).Abdr.Jahrb. geol. Reich.sans/. 55(2): 388 [Plwcoena jJhocoena relicta]. chus]. 43 [Steno]. 44 [Stenella allenuala allenuata]. 46 [Pontoporia]. 48 [CajJerea marginata]. pl. 34 [Cepha[{)­ Allen (1902). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 16: 485 [Phoca vilulina stejnegen]. rhynchus eutrojJia]. Anderson (1879). Anal. Znol.&s., Yunnan, 551 [BalaenojJlera edeni]. Gray (1850).Cat. Spec. Mamm.Coll. Brit. Mus. Part I. Cetacea, II5 [Stenella clymene]. Andrews (1908). Bull. Am.Mus. Nat. Hist. 24: 203 [MesojJ/odon bowdoini]. Gray (1859). Proc. Znol.Soc. London 1859: 359 [Callorhinus]. Andrews (19II). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 30: 31 [Phocoenoides].32 [Phocoenoides dalli truei]. Gray (1864). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 3"1Ser. 14: 350 [Eschrichlius]. Baker, Smith & Pichler (2002). J !Wy.Soc. New ilal. 32: 725 [Cephalorhynchus hectori maui]. Gray (1864). Proc. Znol.Soc. London 1864: 28 [Phoca vilulina richardii], 201 [Eubalaena]. 202 [Caperea]. Barabash-Nikiforov (I 935).Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscou, Seel.Biol. 44: 246 [DeljJhinus delphis jJonticus]. Gray (1865). Proc. Znol.Soc. London 1865: 357 [MesojJlodonlayardii]. Barabash-Nikiforov (1940). Voronezhlwgo Gosudarstvennogo Univ.,,86 [TursiojJs truncatus j1onticus]. Gray (1866). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 3"'Ser. 18: 231 [Neophoca]. Beasley, Robertson & Arnold (2005). Mar. Mamm. Sci. 21: 378 ['brcaella heinsohni]. Gray (1866). Cat.Seals WhalesBrit. Mus., 285 [Orcaella].401 [Sotalia]. van Bree (1971). Mammalia 35: 345 [DeljJhinus cajJensis lrojJicalis]. Gray (1866). Proc. Znol.Soc. London 1866: 213 [Sousa, Stenella]. de Blainville (1817).Nouv. Diet. Hist.Nat. 9: 151 [Inia geo]Jrensis]. 178 [Mesoplodon densiroslris]. Gray (1870).Proc. Znol.Soc. London 1870: 77 [Feresa). deBlainville (1820).J Phys.
    [Show full text]
  • Humpback Whales Interfering When Mammal-Eating Killer Whales Attack Other Species: Mobbing Behavior and Interspecific Altruism?
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 33(1): 7–58 (January 2017) Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. DOI: 10.1111/mms.12343 Humpback whales interfering when mammal-eating killer whales attack other species: Mobbing behavior and interspecific altruism? ROBERT L. PITMAN,1 Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 8901 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, California 92037, U.S.A.; VOLKER B. DEECKE, Centre for Wildlife Conservation, University of Cumbria, Rydal Road, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 9BB, United Kingdom; CHRISTINE M. GABRIELE, Humpback Whale Monitoring Pro- gram, Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, PO Box 140, Gustavus, Alaska 99826, U.S.A.; MRIDULA SRINIVASAN, Office of Science and Technology, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A.; NANCY BLACK, Califor- nia Killer Whale Project, PO Box 52001, Pacific Grove, California 93950, U.S.A.; JUDITH DENKINGER, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, College of Biology and Environmental Science, Diego de Robles e Interoceanica, Quito, Ecuador; JOHN W. DURBAN, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 8901 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, California 92037, U.S.A.; ELIZABETH A. MATHEWS, 1350B Yulupa Avenue, Santa Rosa, California 95405, U.S.A.; DENA R. MATKIN, North Gulf Oceanic Society, PO Box 22, Gustavus, Alaska 99826, U.S.A.; JANET L.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Fidelity, Associations and Long-Term Bonds of Short-Finned Pilot Whales Off the Sli and of Hawai`I
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PDXScholar Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-2012 Site Fidelity, Associations and Long-Term Bonds of Short-Finned Pilot Whales off the slI and of Hawai`i Sabre D. Mahaffy Portland State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Recommended Citation Mahaffy, Sabre D., "Site Fidelity, Associations and Long-Term Bonds of Short-Finned Pilot Whales off the slI and of Hawai`i" (2012). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 320. 10.15760/etd.320 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Site Fidelity, Associations and Long-Term Bonds of Short-Finned Pilot Whales off the Island of Hawai„i by Sabre D. Mahaffy A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology Thesis Committee: Deborah Duffield, Chair Robin W. Baird Bradley A. Buckley Portland State University 2012 Abstract Short-finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus) are the most frequently sighted odontocete in a long-term study in Hawai„i (representing 23.8% of all odontocete sightings from directed research efforts), yet little has been published on this species in Hawaiian waters. Studies elsewhere have suggested that short-finned pilot whales travel in stable mixed-sex groups composed of strongly associated individuals; however temporal analyses of social structure are lacking.
    [Show full text]
  • Dive Distribution and Group Size Parameters for Marine Species Occurring in the U.S
    MITT Species Dive Distribution and Group Size Parameters Technical Report 29 March 2018 NUWC-NPT Technical Report 12,273 29 March 2018 Dive Distribution and Group Size Parameters for Marine Species Occurring in the U.S. Navy’s Mariana Islands Training and Testing Study Area Stephanie L. Watwood Jocelyn R. Borcuk NUWC Division Newport Erin M. Oliveira Emily R. Robinson McLaughlin Research Corporation Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport, Rhode Island Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and U. S. DoD contractors only; Administrative or Operational Use; 29 March 2018. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport, RI 02841-1708. MITT Species Dive Distribution and Group Size Parameters Technical Report 29 March 2018 PREFACE An important element of the Navy’s comprehensive environmental planning is the acoustic effects analysis executed with the Navy Acoustic Effects Model (NAEMO) software. NAEMO was developed to estimate the possible impacts of anthropogenic sound on marine animals, combining established acoustic propagation modeling with data regarding the distribution and abundance of marine species. This report recommends species-typical static depth distributions and group size information for all marine mammal and sea turtle species that occur in the Mariana Islands Training and Testing (MITT) Study Areas that will be modeled using NAEMO. Technical reviewers for this report were Chip Johnson (Command Pacific Fleet), Laura Busch (United States Fleet Forces), Andrew DiMatteo (McLaughlin Research Corporation), Dawn Grebner (Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Keyport), Jennifer Paulk (Naval Air Systems Command), and Tara Moll (Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport).
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Classification of Dolphin Echolocation Click Types from the Gulf of Mexico
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Automated classification of dolphin echolocation click types from the Gulf of Mexico Kaitlin E. Frasier1*, Marie A. Roch2, Melissa S. Soldevilla3, Sean M. Wiggins1, Lance P. Garrison3, John A. Hildebrand1 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California, United States of America, 2 San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America, 3 NOAA NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Protected Resources and Biodiversity Division, Miami, Florida, United States of America a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Delphinids produce large numbers of short duration, broadband echolocation clicks which may be useful for species classification in passive acoustic monitoring efforts. A challenge OPEN ACCESS in echolocation click classification is to overcome the many sources of variability to recog- Citation: Frasier KE, Roch MA, Soldevilla MS, nize underlying patterns across many detections. An automated unsupervised network- Wiggins SM, Garrison LP, Hildebrand JA (2017) based classification method was developed to simulate the approach a human analyst uses Automated classification of dolphin echolocation when categorizing click types: Clusters of similar clicks were identified by incorporating mul- click types from the Gulf of Mexico. PLoS Comput tiple click characteristics (spectral shape and inter-click interval distributions) to distinguish Biol 13(12): e1005823. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1005823 within-type from between-type variation, and identify distinct, persistent click types. Once click types were established, an algorithm for classifying novel detections using existing Editor: Herve Glotin, CNRS -LSIS USTV, FRANCE clusters was tested. The automated classification method was applied to a dataset of 52 mil- Received: April 10, 2017 lion clicks detected across five monitoring sites over two years in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM).
    [Show full text]