DOCSLIB.ORG

Between Change and Continuity: Making Sense of America's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Between Change and Continuity: Making Sense of America's MARCH 2018 54 BETWEEN CHANGE AND CONTINUITY MAKING SENSE OF AMERICA’S EVOLVING GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT Mika Aaltola, Charly Salonius-Pasternak, Juha Käpylä and Ville Sinkkonen (eds.) MARCH 2018 54 BETWEEN CHANGE AND CONTINUITY MAKING SENSE OF AMERICA’S EVOLVING GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT Mika Aaltola, Charly Salonius-Pasternak, Juha Käpylä and Ville Sinkkonen (eds.) MARCH 2018 54 This publication is the final report of a research project conducted by The Finnish Institute of International Affairs entitled ‘America’s changing global role and its impacts on transatlantic relations’. The project is part of the implementation of the Government Plan for Analysis, Assessment and Research for 2017. The report has been previously published in the publication series of the Government’s analysis, assessment and research activities (3/2018) on 31 January 2018. Reports can be ordered from the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. +358 9 432 7707 [email protected] All FIIA reports and other publications are also available on our website at www.fiia.fi Graphics: Inka Reijonen Language editing: Joan Nordlund Graphic design: Mainostoimisto SST Oy Layout: Kaarina Tammisto Printed by Grano Oy, 2018 ISBN (print) 978-951-769-557-2 ISBN (web) 978-951-769-558-9 ISSN 2323-5454 The Finnish Institute of International Affairs is an independent research institute that produces high-level research to support political decisionmaking and public debate both nationally and in- ternationally. All manuscripts are reviewed by at least two other experts in the field to ensure the high quality of the publications. In addition, publications undergo professional language checking and editing. The responsibility for the views expressed ultimately rests with the authors. CONTENTS List of abbreviations 9 Preface 13 Introduction 15 PART I DOMESTIC DRIVERS OF CHANGE AND CONTINUITY 29 1. The political culture: competing visions for 21st-century America 33 Mika Aaltola & Ville Sinkkonen 2. Institutional and party-political dynamics in the United States 55 Anna Kronlund PART II FOREIGN AND DEFENCE POLICY 73 3. US foreign policy: the “Trump doctrine” 77 Ville Sinkkonen 4. Crosscurrents in US defence policy 93 Leo Michel PART III MULTILATERAL GOVERNANCE 113 5. The uncertain future of the liberal international order 117 Ville Sinkkonen 6. Global economic co-operation in the Trump era 133 Johanna Jacobsson PART IV NEW GREAT POWER POLITICS 151 7. The US-Russia relationship 155 Mark N. Katz 8. The United States and the transforming security environment in Asia 171 Bart Gaens 9. Trends in the transatlantic security relationship 189 Charly Salonius-Pasternak & Mika Aaltola 10. US engagement in the Arctic 205 Juha Käpylä & Harri Mikkola 11. The US and the security of the Baltic Sea region 225 Charly Salonius-Pasternak & Mika Aaltola Conclusion: the emergent waiting game 239 References 255 About the contributors 277 Previously published in the series 280 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS A2AD Anti-Access and Area Denial AB Appellate Body (of the World Trade Organization) AC Arctic Council ABM Anti-Ballistic Missile AIIB Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank ANWR Arctic National Wildlife Refuge APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation BRI Belt and Road Initiative BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (bloc of countries) CBO Congressional Budget Office CETA EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement CPTPP Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership CSDP Common Security and Defense Policy CUSPP Center on US Politics and Power DACA Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals DCA Dual Capable Aircraft EDC European Defence Community EDI European Deterrence Initiative EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EMU Economic and Monetary Union (EU) EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERI European Reassurance Initiative ESDP European Security and Defense Policy FISE Finland – Sweden Defense Cooperation FY Fiscal Year FTA Free Trade Agreement GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GDP Gross Domestic Product GIUK Gap Greenland, Iceland, United Kingdom Gap GLACIER Conference on Global Leadership in the Arctic MARCH 2018 9 GOP “Grand Old Party” (the Republican Party) IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ICC International Criminal Court ICS Investment Court System IMF International Monetary Fund INF Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces ISAF International Security Assistance Force ISDS Investor-State Dispute Settlement ISIS Islamic State of Iraq and Syria ISR Intelligence-Surveillance-Reconnaissance JCPOA Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action KORUS US – Korea Free Trade Agreement MDR Missile Defense Review MENA Middle East and North Africa region NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement NDS National Defense Strategy New START New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty NORAD North American Aerospace Defense Command NORDEFCO Nordic Defence Cooperation NPR Nuclear Posture Review NSC National Security Council NSS National Security Strategy OCO Overseas Contingency Operations OIR Operation Inherent Resolve OMB Office of Management and Budget PLAN People’s Liberation Army Navy PSI Proliferation Security Initiative QDR Quadrennial Defense Review R2P Responsibility to Protect RCEP Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership RNC Republican National Committee ROK Republic of Korea SDF Self-Defence Forces (Japan) TAC Treaty of Amity and Cooperation THAAD Terminal High Altitude Area Defense TPP Trans-Pacific Partnership TTIP Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership UNCLOS United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNSC United Nations Security Council 10 MARCH 2018 USAID United States Agency for International Development USTR United States Trade Representative WMD Weapon of Mass Destruction WTO World Trade Organization MARCH 2018 11 PREFACE This report focuses on key internal and external tendencies that influence how the United States understands its role in the world. It also investigates the development of US policies in the international arena, and highlights the potential implications of America’s current and future foreign engage- ment for Europe in general and the Nordic-Baltic region more specifically. The report details the work of a research project that was carried out at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs in 2017. It was previously published in the publication series of the Government of Finland’s analysis, assessment and research activities (3/2018) on January 31, 2018. The research project was carried out and funded within the framework of the Government’s analysis, assessment and research activities, which aims to generate information that supports decision-making, working practices and management by knowledge. The report has been edited by Mika Aaltola, Charly Salonius-Pasternak, Juha Käpylä and Ville Sinkkonen, all from the Finnish Institute of Inter- national Affairs, with the support of an international team of lead authors. The editorial team would like to thank all the contributors for their hard work and insightful efforts. The team is also grateful for the helpful comments provided by the project’s steering group, and the instrumen- tal role played by the coordinating staff and the publications team at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. MARCH 2018 13 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND This report investigates the evolution of America’s global engagement after the election of Donald J. Trump as the 45th president of the United States. In particular, the study maps out key internal and external tendencies that influence – even beyond one election cycle or single administra- tion – how the US understands its role in the world. It also investigates the development of US policies in the international arena, and highlights the potential implications of America’s current and future foreign engagement for Europe in general and the Nordic-Baltic region more specifically. In conclusion, a number of rules of thumb are suggested, which Finland as a small but internationally networked and export-oriented state could follow as it (re)formulates its approach to the United States now and in the future. As the results of the 2016 congressional and presidential elections illustrate, the American politico-cultural climate is experiencing pro- found polarisation. Conflictual cultural dynamics with long historical roots have accentuated the inability of the US political system to govern effectively through pragmatic compromise. The demographic makeup of the United States is also undergoing a historical transformation, as the proportion of ethnic minorities in the population keeps increasing. At the same time, perceptions of structural injustice have fuelled a protest mentality among certain sections of society, most notably in the African American community. This belief in the inherent unfairness of the sys- tem is also increasingly apparent among Americans of European descent, MARCH 2018 15 manifest most recently in the activation of Donald Trump’s voter base in the 2016 elections. Coincidentally, new modes of election campaigning and political mobilisation based on fake news and social-media bubbles, along with suspicions of foreign collusion and influence, are topics of everyday discussion in the US. Although the American economy recovered relatively quickly from the 2007/8 financial crisis, the perception prevails that globalisation has not created equal opportunities throughout the country. Income inequalities are increasingly viewed as an ever-strengthening barrier against social mobility – the realisation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AN ANALYSIS of POST-COLD WAR CONCEPTS in AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: CONTINUITY OR CHANGE? by Ana Maria Venegas a Thesis Submitted
    AN ANALYSIS OF POST-COLD WAR CONCEPTS IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: CONTINUITY OR CHANGE? by Ana Maria Venegas A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Global Security Studies Baltimore, Maryland December 2014 © 2014 Ana Maria Venegas All Rights Reserved Abstract This thesis investigates post-Cold War concepts in US foreign policy. At the end of the Cold War, prominent political scientists and commentators argued, for various reasons, that the strategic environment was so dramatically different that the United States would no longer be able to engage the world as it had in the past. In an attempt to understand the ramifications of the evolution of the strategic environment, this thesis asked the question: Have the three post-Cold War presidents, William J. Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack H. Obama, continued to engage the world in ways consistent with previous administrations or have the broken from traditional concepts in American foreign policy? To answer this question, declaratory foreign policy as articulated in national security strategy documents and key foreign policy engagements were analyzed and compared to nine traditional concepts in American foreign policy identified by prominent historians and political scientists. The post-Cold War administrations continued to develop foreign policy consistent with the concepts identified by historians and political scientists suggesting a measure of consistency in the way the United States engages the world. Additionally, each president developed foreign policy that exhibited unique characteristics inconsistent with the traditional concepts. These policies were characterized by the importance placed on multilateral consensus; an emphasis on multilateral agreements and alliances to foster a stable international order; and the reliance on international organizations to address regional and global issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brookings Institution
    1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION Brookings Briefing PUBLIC PHILOSOPHY: WHY MORALITY MATTERS IN POLITICS Tuesday, January 24, 2006 MICHAEL SANDEL WILLIAM GALSTON CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER E.J. DIONNE, JR., Moderator [TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED FROM A TAPE RECORDING] MILLER REPORTING CO., INC. 735 8th STREET, S.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20003-2802 (202) 546-6666 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. DIONNE: [In progress] —become important to their time not by seeking in a contrived and silly way something called relevance, they become important to their time by thinking clearly systematically and insightfully about public issues and public problems. And by that measure, Mike Sandel is truly one of our moment's most important political and public philosophers. So I loved it when Mike finally put out this collection called "Public Philosophy," of which we in general and, I personally believe, liberals in particular are very much in search of. I just want to read one brief passage from the beginning of Mike's book, which gives you a sense of how relevant his discussion is to our moment. He notes that the Democrats have been struggling for awhile over what some call the "moral values thing." "When Democrats in recent times have reached for moral and religious resonance," he writes, "their efforts have taken two forms, neither wholly convincing. Some, following the example of George W. Bush, have sprinkled their speeches with religious rhetoric and biblical references. So intense was the competition for divine favor in the 2000 and 2004 campaigns that a Web site, beliefnet.com, established a God-o- meter to track the candidates' references to God.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Annual Report
    The New Conservative Flagship ANNUAL REPORT 2020A About American Compass Table of Contents Our Mission To restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity: 1 Founder’s Letter 4 REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions. SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self- sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next 2 Year in Review 10 generation for the same. Conservative Flagship 12 HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. Changing the Debate 14 Our Activities Creating Community 16 AFFILIATION. Providing opportunities for people who share its mission to The Commons 18 build relationships, collaborate, and communicate their views to the broader political community. Our Growing Influence 20 DELIBERATION. Supporting research and discussion that advances understanding of economic and social conditions and tradeoffs through study of history, analysis of data, elaboration of theory, and development of policy 3 Our Work 21 proposals. ENGAGEMENT. Initiating and facilitating public debate to challenge existing Rebooting the American System 22 orthodoxy, confront the best arguments of its defenders, and force scrutiny of unexamined assumptions and unconsidered consequences. Coin-Flip Capitalism 26 Our Principles Moving the Chains 30 AMERICAN COMPASS strives to embody the principles and practices of a healthy democratic polity, combining intellectual combat with personal civility. Corporate Actual Responsibility 34 We welcome converts to our vision and value disagreement amongst A Seat at the Table 38 our members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unipolar Moment Author(S): Charles Krauthammer Source: Foreign Affairs, Vol
    The Unipolar Moment Author(s): Charles Krauthammer Source: Foreign Affairs, Vol. 70, No. 1, America and the World 1990/91 (1990/1991), pp. 23-33 Published by: Council on Foreign Relations Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20044692 Accessed: 18/01/2009 12:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=cfr. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Council on Foreign Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Foreign Affairs. http://www.jstor.org Charles Krauthammer THE UNIPOLARMOMENT m -* E ver since it became clear that an exhausted Soviet Union was calling off the Cold War, the quest has been on for a new American role in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegemonic Masculinity and Humor in the 2016 Presidential Election
    SRDXXX10.1177/2378023117749380SociusSmirnova 749380research-article2017 Special Issue: Gender & Politics Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World Volume X: 1 –16 © The Author(s) 2017 Small Hands, Nasty Women, and Bad Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Hombres: Hegemonic Masculinity and DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117749380 10.1177/2378023117749380 Humor in the 2016 Presidential Election srd.sagepub.com Michelle Smirnova1 Abstract Given that the president is thought to be the national representative, presidential campaigns often reflect the efforts to define a national identity and collective values. Political humor provides a unique lens through which to explore how identity figures into national politics given that the critique of an intended target is often made through popular cultural scripts that often inadvertently reify the very power structures they seek to subvert. In conducting an analysis of 240 tweets, memes, and political cartoons from the 2016 U.S. presidential election targeting the two frontrunners, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, we see how popular political humor often reaffirmed heteronormative assumptions of gender, sexuality, and race and equated scripts of hegemonic masculinity with presidential ability. In doing so, these discourses reified a patriarchal power structure. Keywords gender, hegemonic masculinity, memes, humor, politics Introduction by which patriarchal power subjugates or excludes women, the LGTBQ community, people of color, and other marginal- On November 8, 2016, Republican candidate Donald Trump ized populations. Hegemonic masculinity is directly linked was elected president of the United States over Democratic to patriarchy in that it exists as the form of masculinity that candidate Hillary Clinton. Gender was a particularly salient is “culturally exalted” in a particular historical and geograph- feature of the 2016 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystery Money
    MYSTERY MONEY How a loophole could allow foreign money to flow into super PACs through secretive shell companies ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was written by Research Director Michael Beckel and Research Associate Amisa Ratliff. Design by Communications Associate Sydney Richards. Cover image credit: bioraven/Shutterstock.com ABOUT ISSUE ONE Issue One is the leading crosspartisan political reform group in Washington. We unite Republicans, Democrats, and independents in the movement to increase transparency, strengthen ethics and accountability, and reduce the influence of big money in politics. Issue One’s ReFormers Caucus of more than 200 former members of Congress, governors, and Cabinet officials is the largest bipartisan coalition of its kind ever assembled to advocate for solutions to fix our broken political system. Issue One 1401 K Street NW, Ste. 350 Washington, D.C. 20005 © 2020 Issue One MEDIA CONTACT Michael Beckel [email protected] | 202-888-6770 issueone.org | facebook.com/issueonereform | @issueonereform [ 2 — Mystery Money ] Issue One MYSTERY MONEY BY MICHAEL BECKEL & AMISA RATLIFF INTRODUCTION oney laundering schemes to illegally funnel foreign money into super PACs M through shell companies threaten the integrity of our political system. Since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010 paved the way for the super PAC era, there has been a proliferation of corporate super PAC donors — including scores of opaque and obscure companies that allow the people behind them to remain hidden. Such secretive entities provide especially ideal cover for foreigners wishing to evade the existing prohibition on their involvement in U.S. elections. A new Issue One analysis shows why this loophole needs to be closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump Shoots the Match1 Sharon Mazer
    Donald Trump Shoots the Match1 Sharon Mazer The day I realized it can be smart to be shallow was, for me, a deep experience. —Donald J. Trump (2004; in Remnick 2017:19) I don’t care if it’s real or not. Kill him! Kill him! 2 He’s currently President of the USA, but a scant 10 years ago, Donald Trump stepped into the squared circle, facing off against WWE owner and quintessential heel Mr. McMahon3 in the “Battle of the Billionaires” (WrestleMania XXIII). The stakes were high. The loser would have his head shaved by the winner. (Spoiler alert: Trump won.) Both Trump and McMahon kept their suits on—oversized, with exceptionally long ties—in a way that made their heads appear to hover, disproportionately small, over their bulky (Trump) and bulked up (McMahon) bodies. As avatars of capitalist, patriarchal power, they left the heavy lifting to the gleamingly exposed, hypermasculinist bodies of their pro-wrestler surrogates. McMahon performed an expert heel turn: a craven villain, egging the audience to taunt him as a clueless, elitist frontman as he did the job of casting Trump as an (unlikely) babyface, the crowd’s champion. For his part, Trump seemed more mark than smart. Where McMahon and the other wrestlers were working around him, like ham actors in an outsized play, Trump was shooting the match: that is, not so much acting naturally as neglecting to act at all. He soaked up the cheers, stalked the ring, took a fall, threw a sucker punch, and claimed victory as if he (and he alone) had fought the good fight (WWE 2013b).
    [Show full text]
  • The Great White Hoax
    THE GREAT WHITE HOAX Featuring Tim Wise [Transcript] INTRODUCTION Text on screen Charlottesville, Virginia August 11, 2017 Protesters [chanting] You will not replace us! News reporter A major American college campus transformed into a battlefield. Hundreds of white nationalists storming the University of Virginia. Protesters [chanting] Whose streets? Our streets! News reporter White nationalists protesting the removal of a Confederate statue. The setting a powder keg ready to blow. Protesters [chanting] White lives matter! Counter-protesters [chanting] Black lives matter! Protesters [chanting] White lives matter! News reporter The march spiraling out of control. So-called Alt-Right demonstrators clashing with counter- protesters some swinging torches. Text on screen August 12, 2017 News reporter (continued) The overnight violence spilling into this morning when march-goers and counter-protesters clash again. © 2017 Media Education Foundation | mediaed.org 1 David Duke This represents a turning point for the people of this country. We are determined to take our country back. We're going to fulfill the promises of Donald Trump. That's what we believed in. That's why we voted for Donald Trump. Because he said he's going to take our country back. And that's what we gotta do. News reporter A horrifying scene in Charlottesville, as this car plowed into a crowd of people. The driver then backing up and, witnesses say, dragging at least one person. Donald Trump We're closely following the terrible events unfolding in Charlottesville, Virginia. We condemn, in the strongest possible terms, this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence on many sides. On many sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Capuzza and Daily Capitalized on the Energy Created by the March to Achieve Their Ends (Cochrane, 2017)
    Women & Language We March On: Voices from the Women’s March on Washington Jamie C. Capuzza University of Mount Union Tamara Daily University of Mount Union Abstract: Protest marches are an important means of political expression. We investigated protesters’ motives for participating in the original Women’s March on Washington. Two research questions guided this study. First, to what degree did concerns about gender injustices motivate marchers to participate? Second, to what degree did marchers’ motives align with the goals established by march organizers? Seven-hundred eighty-seven participants responded to three open-ended questions: (1) Why did you choose to participate in the march, (2) What did you hope to accomplish, and (3) What events during the 2016 presidential election caused you the greatest concern? Responses were coded thematically. Findings indicated that gender injustices were not the sole source of motivation. Most respondents were motivated to march for a variety of reasons, hoped the march would function as a show of solidarity and resistance, and indicated that the misogynistic rhetoric of the 2016 presidential campaign was a deep concern. Finally, the comparison of respondents’ motives and organizers’ stated goals indicated a shared sense of purpose for the march. Keywords:feminism, Women’s March, political communication, motive, intersectionality ON JANUARY 21, 2017, AN ESTIMATED seven million people joined together across all seven continents in one of the largest political protests the world has witnessed. The Women’s March on Washington, including its over 650 sister marches, is considered the largest of its kind in U.S. history (Chenoweth & Pressman, 2017; Wallace & Parlapiano, 2017), and it is one of the most significant political and rhetorical events of the contemporary women’s movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evil Savage Other As Enemy in Modern U.S. Presidential Discourse
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy The Evil Savage Other as Enemy in Modern U.S. Presidential Discourse Jérôme Viala-Gaudefroy Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/498 DOI: 10.4000/angles.498 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Jérôme Viala-Gaudefroy, « The Evil Savage Other as Enemy in Modern U.S. Presidential Discourse », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/angles/498 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/angles.498 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The Evil Savage Other as Enemy in Modern U.S. Presidential Discourse 1 The Evil Savage Other as Enemy in Modern U.S. Presidential Discourse Jérôme Viala-Gaudefroy 1 Most scholars in international relations hold the view that our knowledge of the world is a human and social construction rather than the mere reflection of reality (Wendt 1994; Finnemore 1996). This perspective, rooted in constructivist epistemology, implies that nations are not unquestionable ancient natural quasi-objective entities, as primordialist nationalists claim, but rather cognitive constructions shaped by stories their members imagine and relate.1 This was famously illustrated by Benedict Anderson’s study of nationalism that reached the compelling conclusion that any community “larger than that primordial village of face-to-face contact” can only be imagined (Anderson 1983: 6). The identity of a nation is undoubtedly dependent on stories its members imagine and relate.
    [Show full text]
  • Will “America First” Leave America Alone? – the Trump Administration’S Trade Policy in the Indo-Pacific Region Author Darah Phillip by Darah Phillip
    Special Article 2 Will “America First” Leave America Alone? – The Trump Administration’s Trade Policy in the Indo-Pacific Region Author Darah Phillip By Darah Phillip President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the Trans- ties with the US. Pacific Partnership (TPP) in one of his first acts in office on Jan. 24, For the US and Japan, the TPP created an opportunity for the two 2017. The withdrawal was an early demonstration of his nationalistic, countries to pursue an economic relationship to match and “America First” trade philosophy. Trump’s initial argument behind complement their longstanding bilateral security alliance. Under the leaving the TPP was that the US, and American workers in particular, guise of tying Japan’s economy with that of the US, the TPP enabled would be worse off in the trading bloc. He also insisted that he was a Japanese negotiators to counter domestic resistance to trade in areas tougher negotiator than former President Barack Obama and that he such as agriculture by leaning on the strategic imperative of using the could negotiate a better deal for Americans. Three and a half years agreement to mitigate Japan’s growing economic dependence on after leaving the TPP, however, the Trump administration has not China. produced a trade framework in the Indo-Pacific region to surpass, let The TPP was also expected to encourage growth in US trade with alone rival, the TPP. Instead, the US may be more isolated from its Vietnam and Malaysia, two countries with high trade barriers and yet economic partners in the region today than it was in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Fbi Testimony Trump Using Fake Russian Stories
    Fbi Testimony Trump Using Fake Russian Stories Old-fogeyish and unavowed Selig never graced stately when Noland officiating his converting. Unlit and eristic Lowell mulcts her newsletter kitting while Beck cogitate some boneshakers good-humouredly. Enfeebling Bertrand blear illiterately or superimposing slovenly when Chaim is nonbiological. Trump Top campaign officials Paul Manafort Jared Kushner and Donald Trump Jr did she reject this offer of election assistance from being hostile foreign. Barnett came several years ago because it had relieved great respect, to you plan; and infiltrate conservative politics or coordinated attempt to raise serious crimes. But using russian story is stories that us a business and uses information used in the middle of the process, the state and. Charles Lane Ben Domenech and Trey Gowdy react to rip three of Senate impeachment trial in 'Special Report'. Mueller's report by no i that somehow Trump campaign for the 2016 US presidential election conspired with free Russian government's. Former fbi using social issues relating to use their findings by trump administration sought to steele dossier generated entirely abroad in a fake clinton to provide more. Russian propaganda over Crimea and the Ukraine: how exact it work? Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the ignorant of PBS viewers and party the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. You can inflate a trek of supported browsers in here Help Center. PM Emin Agalarov calls Trump Jr. FBI's Comey testifies before an Intelligence Committee on. Flynn lied about what nature was his calls with Kislyak. Jake Tapper jaketapper Twitter. But match found no prospect of a conspiracy.
    [Show full text]