Stream Type Assessment of the Mackay-Whitsundays Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stream Type Assessment of the Mackay-Whitsundays Region DRAFT REPORT: Stream type assessment of the Mackay-Whitsundays region March 2017 Document history Revision: Revision no. 01 Author/s Misko Ivezich Jacqui Reid Checked Ross Hardie/Steve Skull Approved Misko Ivezich Distribution: Revision no. 01 Issue date March 2017 Issued to Chris Dench (Reef Catchments) Description: Draft for comment Citation: Draft for comment - please do not cite. Acknowledgements: We would like to acknowledge and thank the following people for their input in this review: Chris Dench (Reef Catchments) Paul Grove from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) Ref: V:\Projects\Brisbane_Projects_2016\018_Mackay_Whitsunday_Stre am_Classification\1_Deliverables\P416018_R01_Mackay_Whitsunda ys_stream_type_assessment_draft_for_comment.docx Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Study objectives 2 1.3 Report structure 2 2 Study area 3 2.1 Landscape 3 2.2 Climate 5 2.3 Geology/soils 7 2.4 Land use 7 3 Approach 11 3.1 Overview 11 4 Stream type assessment 13 Edgecumbe Bay 15 Overview 15 Stream type assessment 15 Riparian vegetation condition 15 Stability 16 Physical form values 16 Sediment connectivity 16 4.1 Repulse Bay 19 Overview 19 Stream type assessment 19 Riparian vegetation condition 20 Stability 21 Physical form values 21 Sediment connectivity 21 4.2 Whitsunday Coast 25 Overview 25 Stream type assessment 25 Riparian vegetation condition 25 Stability 25 Physical form values 25 Sediment connectivity 25 4.3 Seaforth Coast 28 Overview 28 Stream type assessment 28 Riparian vegetation condition 29 Stability 29 Physical form values 29 Sediment connectivity 29 4.4 Sandringham Bay 32 Overview 32 Stream type assessment 32 Riparian vegetation condition 34 Stability 34 Physical form values 35 Sediment connectivity 35 Stream type assessment of the Mackay-Whitsundays region i 4.5 Sarina Inlet 38 Overview 38 Stream type assessment 38 Riparian vegetation condition 38 Stability 38 Physical form values 38 Sediment connectivity 39 4.6 Ince Bay 42 Overview 42 Stream type assessment 42 Riparian vegetation condition 43 Stability 43 Physical form values 43 Sediment connectivity 43 4.7 Carmila Coast 46 Overview 46 Stream type assessment 46 Riparian vegetation condition 46 Stability 47 Physical form values 47 Sediment connectivity 47 5 Summary 51 6 References 52 Attachment A Stream type assessment method 53 Stream type method 54 Primary channel assessment 54 Inset channel assessment 56 Overall channel stability 57 Sediment regime and connectivity 57 Instream habitat 58 Physical form condition 58 Figures Figure 1. Project Study area – major management basins outlined in red 1 Figure 2. Elevation throughout the Mackay-Whitsundays study area showing high relief associated with the Clark Conner Range 4 Figure 3. Rainfall data from Crediton (33172) and Mackay (33119) showing the variability in monthly rainfall. These stations are located near the centre of Mackay- Whitsundays region. 5 Figure 4. Rainfall variability within the study area demonstrated by mean annual rainfall isohyets between the years 1920 to 1969 6 Figure 5. Geology within the study area 8 Figure 6. Soil types within the study area 9 Figure 7. Land use within the Mackay-Whitsundays region 10 Figure 9. The eight receiving waters and their catchments across the Mackay Whitsundays region 14 Figure 10. Section of Emu Creek which is slightly confined by bedrock 15 Figure 11. Significant weed growth within the upper floodplain reach of Gregory River 16 Figure 12. Stream types within the Edgecumbe Bay receiving waters catchment 17 Figure 13. Riparian vegetation condition within the Edgecumbe Bay receiving waters catchment 18 Figure 14. Channel stability within the Edgecumbe Bay receiving waters catchment 18 Figure 15. Inset channel of the Proserpine River within a larger macrochannel 19 Figure 16. Riparian vegetation along the lower Proserpine River 20 Figure 17.Good riparian vegetation within the macrochannel of the Andromache River 21 Stream type assessment of the Mackay-Whitsundays region ii Figure 18. Stream types within the Repulse Bay receiving waters catchment 22 Figure 19. Riparian vegetation condition within the Repulse Bay receiving waters catchment 23 Figure 20. Channel stability within the Repulse Bay receiving waters catchment 24 Figure 21. Degraded riparian vegetation in Campbell Creek 25 Figure 22. Stream types within the Whitsundays Coast receiving waters catchment 26 Figure 23. Riparian vegetation condition within the Whitsundays Coast receiving waters catchment 27 Figure 24. Channel stability within the Whitsundays Coast receiving waters catchment 27 Figure 25. Blackrock Creek, significantly confined by terraces. There is good riparian vegetation within the macrochannel. 28 Figure 26. Poor riparian vegetation within St Helens Creek with exotic groundcovers dominating the riparian zone 29 Figure 27. Stream types within the Seaforth Coast receiving waters catchment 30 Figure 28. Riparian vegetation condition within the Seaforth Coast receiving waters catchment 31 Figure 29. Channel stability within the Seaforth Coast receiving waters catchment 31 Figure 30. Cattle Creek, upstream of the Pioneer River confluence, has a macro-channel morphology which is significantly confined by terraces 33 Figure 31. Lower Sandy Creek is significantly confined by the adjacent terraces 33 Figure 32. Excellent riparian vegetation within McGregor Creek which is significantly confined by terraces 34 Figure 33. Engineered Log Jams and revegetation have been used to limit bank erosion in Owen Creek 35 Figure 34. Stream types within the Sandringham Bay receiving waters catchment 36 Figure 35. Riparian vegetation condition within the Sandringham Bay receiving waters catchment 37 Figure 36. Channel stability within the Sandringham Bay receiving waters catchment 37 Figure 37. Lower Plane Creek which is slightly confined by terraces; through this section both banks abut inset floodplain units 38 Figure 38. A section of Plane Creek which has significant weed infestation 39 Figure 39. Stream types across the Sarina Inlet receiving waters catchment 40 Figure 40. Riparian vegetation condition within the Sarina Inlet receiving waters catchment 41 Figure 41. Channel stability within the within the Sarina Inlet receiving waters catchment 41 Figure 42. Bedrock intrusion in Rocky Dam Creek 42 Figure 43. Stock tracks impacting riparian vegetation condition within upper Cherry Tree Creek 43 Figure 44. Stream types within the Ince Bay recieving waters catchment 44 Figure 45. Riparian vegetation within the Ince Bay recieving waters catchment 45 Figure 46. Channel stability within the Ince Bay recieving waters catchment 45 Figure 47. Bedrock controls within Gillinbin Creek 46 Figure 48. Riparian vegetation condition is poor in Carmila Creek near the Bruce Highway 47 Figure 49. Stream types within the Carmila Coast receiving waters catchment 48 Figure 50. Riparian vegetation condition within the Carmila Coast receiving waters catchment 49 Figure 51. Channel stability within the Carmila Coast receiving waters catchment 50 Figure 52. Stages of channel incision 56 Tables Table 1. Mackay-Whitsundays catchment areas and lengths of stream 3 Table 2. Overview of the key elements assessed in this report 11 Stream type assessment of the Mackay-Whitsundays region iii 1 Introduction Alluvium Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (Alluvium) has been engaged by Reef Catchments to undertake a stream type assessment of waterways across the Mackay-Whitsundays region (Figure 1). The waterways within the Mackay-Whitsundays region typically drain the eastern slopes of the Clarke Connors Range before flowing east and discharging in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). Channel erosion and degraded riparian vegetation within these waterways are factors that contribute to significant sediment and nutrient loads to the GBRMP. An understanding of the fluvial geomorphology, stream physical form and riparian condition can help inform broader catchment management responses to protect the Great Barrier Reef and improve river health. Figure 1. Project Study area – major management basins outlined in red 1.1 Background Stream channels are the primary conduits for the delivery of catchment derived sediments and nutrients to the coast. Sediments can be derived from hillslopes, gullies and channel erosion. These sediments are periodically stored in a geomorphic units including floodplains, benches, bars and islands. These geomorphic units can exert significant control on waterway processes and impact on how sediments are transported and stored within the fluvial system. Adjustments to channel form occur as a result of relationships that exist between channel form, flow and sediment supply and transport. At the reach-scale, the type of adjustment that can take place is constrained by the valley setting, the nature of bed and bank materials, and riparian vegetation. This gives rise to a wide diversity of different channel forms (or stream types). Understanding the stream types across a region can greatly assist in understanding waterway condition and sediment transport and storage processes. Vegetation plays an important role in these processes. Erosion is a natural and essential process in alluvial systems; however human activities such as land clearing, removal of riparian vegetation or grazing pressure that limits reestablishment of vegetation can result in accelerated rates of channel erosion and sediment Stream type assessment of the Mackay-Whitsundays region 1 delivery. In addition, vegetation within channels
Recommended publications
  • Queensland Public Boat Ramps
    Queensland public boat ramps Ramp Location Ramp Location Atherton shire Brisbane city (cont.) Tinaroo (Church Street) Tinaroo Falls Dam Shorncliffe (Jetty Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Balonne shire Shorncliffe (Sinbad Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank St George (Bowen Street) Jack Taylor Weir Shorncliffe (Yundah Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Banana shire Wynnum (Glenora Street) Wynnum Creek—north bank Baralaba Weir Dawson River Broadsound shire Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (lower ramp) Carmilla Beach (Carmilla Creek Road) Carmilla Creek—south bank, mouth of creek Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (upper ramp) Clairview Beach (Colonial Drive) Clairview Beach Moura Dawson River—8 km west of Moura St Lawrence (Howards Road– Waverley Creek) Bund Creek—north bank Lake Victoria Callide Creek Bundaberg city Theodore Dawson River Bundaberg (Kirby’s Wall) Burnett River—south bank (5 km east of Bundaberg) Beaudesert shire Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (downstream) Logan River (Henderson Street– Henderson Reserve) Logan Reserve Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (upstream) Biggenden shire Burdekin shire Paradise Dam–Main Dam 500 m upstream from visitors centre Barramundi Creek (Morris Creek Road) via Hodel Road Boonah shire Cromarty Creek (Boat Ramp Road) via Giru (off the Haughton River) Groper Creek settlement Maroon Dam HG Slatter Park (Hinkson Esplanade) downstream from jetty Moogerah Dam AG Muller Park Groper Creek settlement Bowen shire (Hinkson
    [Show full text]
  • WQ1251 - Pioneer River and Plane Creek Basins Downs Mine Dam K ! R E Em E ! ! E T
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! %2 ! ! ! ! ! 148°30'E 148°40'E 148°50'E 149°E 149°10'E 149°20'E 149°30'E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ° k k 1 e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! re C 2 se C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! as y ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! M y k S ! C a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ° r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! r Mackay City estuarine 1 %2 Proserpine River Sunset 2 a u ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e M waters (outside port land) ! m ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bay O k Basin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! F C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n Bucasia ! Upper Cattle Creek c Dalr
    [Show full text]
  • Burnett Mary WQIP Ecologically Relevant Targets
    Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis 1 Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Prepared by Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone : (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ 2 Information should be cited as: Brodie J., Lewis S. (2014) Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef. TropWATER Report No. 14/32, Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville, 41 pp. For further information contact: Catchment to Reef Research Group/Jon Brodie and Steven Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University ATSIP Building Townsville, QLD 4811 [email protected] © James Cook University, 2014. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of the work may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of TropWATER. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The copyright owner shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information.
    [Show full text]
  • 189930408.Pdf
    © The University of Queensland and James Cook University, 2018 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ISSN: 2208-4134 Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2016-2017 is licensed for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logos of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, The University of Queensland and James Cook University, any other material protected by a trademark, content supplied by third parties and any photographs. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 This publication should be cited as: Grant, S., Thompson, K., Paxman, C., Elisei, G., Gallen C., Tracey, D., Kaserzon, S., Jiang, H., Samanipour, S. and Mueller, J. 2018, Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2016-2017. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, 128 pp. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the National Library of Australia Front cover image: Turbid river plume emerging from the Russell-Mulgrave river mouth following several days of heavy rainfall in February 2015 © Dieter Tracey, 2015 DISCLAIMER While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this document are factually correct, UQ and JCU do not make any representation or give any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose of the information or statements contained in this document. To the extent permitted by law UQ and JCU shall not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Evidence Report on Citiswich Development by Tony Loveday (Bremer Business Park Masterplan) Prepared For
    A part of BMT in Energy and Environment Response Report to Floods Commission – Review of Evidence Report on Citiswich Development by Tony Loveday (Bremer Business Park Masterplan) prepared for Ipswich City Council R.B18414.005.00.doc November 2011 Response Report to Floods Commission – Review of Evidence Report on Citiswich Development by Tony Loveday (Bremer Business Park Masterplan) prepared for Ipswich City Council November 2011 Offices Brisbane Denver Mackay Melbourne Prepared For: Ipswich City Council Newcastle Perth Sydney Prepared By: BMT WBM Pty Ltd (Member of the BMT group of companies) Vancouver G:\ADMIN\B18414.G.RGS\R.B18414.005.00.DOC CONTENTS I CONTENTS Contents i 1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1-1 2 HISTORY OF THE BREMER BUSINESS PARK AND CITISWICH FLOOD ASSESSMENTS 2-1 3 REVIEW OF FLOOD ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE PROJECT INCLUDING CUMULATIVE ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD STORAGE 3-1 4 COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANNING SCHEME 4-1 5 LIMITATIONS OF THE REVIEW AND ASSUMPTIONS MADE BY MR LOVEDAY 5-1 6 SPECIFIC REVIEW COMMENTS ON MR LOVEDAY’S REPORT 6-1 7 CONCLUSIONS 7-1 APPENDIX A: FLOOD AND STORMWATER REPORTS – CITISWICH ESTATE A-1 APPENDIX B: BCC FILLING AND EXCAVATION CODE B-1 G:\ADMIN\B18414.G.RGS\R.B18414.005.00.DOC PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1-1 1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT This Report has been prepared by Neil Collins to assist Ipswich City Council with expert advice in relation to flooding in its response to a Report prepared by Mr Loveday for the Queensland Floods Commission dated 7 November 2011, in relation to the Bremer Business Park (Citiswich) Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Specific Ecologically Relevant Water Quality Targets for the Great Barrier Reef
    Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier Reef Jon Brodie, Mark Baird, Jane Waterhouse, Mathieu Mongin, Jenny Skerratt, Cedric Robillot, Rachael Smith, Reinier Mann and Michael Warne TropWATER Report number 17/38 June 2017 Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier Reef Report prepared by Jon Brodie1, Mark Baird2, Jane Waterhouse1, Mathieu Mongin2, Jenny Skerratt2, Cedric Robillot3, Rachael Smith4, Reinier Mann4 and Michael Warne4,5 2017 1James Cook University, 2CSIRO, 3eReefs, 4Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, 5Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom EHP16055 – Update and add to the existing 2013 Scientific Consensus Statement to incorporate the most recent science and to support the 2017 update of the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Input and review of the development of the targets provided by John Bennett, Catherine Collier, Peter Doherty, Miles Furnas, Carol Honchin, Frederieke Kroon, Roger Shaw, Carl Mitchell and Nyssa Henry throughout the project. Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone: (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ Citation: Brodie, J., Baird, M., Waterhouse, J., Mongin, M., Skerratt, J., Robillot, C., Smith, R., Mann, R., Warne, M., 2017. Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings
    Fish Habitat Guideline FHG 001 FISH PASSAGE IN STREAMS Fisheries guidelines for design of stream crossings Elizabeth Cotterell August 1998 Fisheries Group DPI ISSN 1441-1652 Agdex 486/042 FHG 001 First published August 1998 Information contained in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. The Queensland Department of Primary Industries has taken all reasonable steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of publication. Readers should ensure that they make appropriate enquiries to determine whether new information is available on the particular subject matter. © The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries 1998 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Department of Primary Industries, Queensland. Enquiries should be addressed to: Manager Publishing Services Queensland Department of Primary Industries GPO Box 46 Brisbane QLD 4001 Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings BACKGROUND Introduction Fish move widely in rivers and creeks throughout Queensland and Australia. Fish movement is usually associated with reproduction, feeding, escaping predators or dispersing to new habitats. This occurs between marine and freshwater habitats, and wholly within freshwater. Obstacles to this movement, such as stream crossings, can severely deplete fish populations, including recreational and commercial species such as barramundi, mullet, Mary River cod, silver perch, golden perch, sooty grunter and Australian bass. Many Queensland streams are ephemeral (they may flow only during the wet season), and therefore crossings must be designed for both flood and drought conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Water Quality Guidelines 2009
    Queensland Water Quality Guidelines 2009 Prepared by: Environmental Policy and Planning, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection © State of Queensland, 2013. Re-published in July 2013 to reflect machinery-of-government changes, (departmental names, web addresses, accessing datasets), and updated reference sources. No changes have been made to water quality guidelines. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on the Impacts of Flooding
    Workshop on the Impacts of Flooding Proceed/rigs of a Workshop held in Rockhamptori, Australia, 27 Septeinber 1991. , Edited by G.T. Byron Queensland Department of. ti Environment tand Heritage ’ Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ‘, , ,’ @ Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ISSN 0156-5842 ISBN 0 624 12044 7 Published by GBRMPA April 1992 The opinions expressed in th.is document are not necessarily those of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority or the Queensland Department of Env/ionment an!d Heritage. Great Barrier Reef Environment and P.O. Box 155 P.O. Box1379 North Quay , Townsville Queens’land 4002 Queensland 48 TABLE OF CONTENTS : PREFACE iv 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V PART A: FORUM PAPERS Jim Pearce MLA Opening Address 1 Peter Baddiley Fitzroy River Basin 3 Rainfalls and The 1991 Flood Event Mike Keane Assessment of the 1991 16 Fitzroy River Flood How much water? J.P. O’Neill, G.T.Byron and Some Physical Characteristics 36 S.C.Wright and Movement of 1991 Fitzroy River flood plume PART B: WORKSHOP PAPERS GROUP A - WATER RELATED’ISSUES Jon E. Brodie and Nutrient Composition of 56 Alan Mitchell the January 1991 Fitzroy River Plume Myriam Preker The Effects of the 1991 75 Central Queensland Floodwaters around Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef i > d.T.Byron and J.P.O’Neill Flood Induced Coral Mortality 76 on Fringing Reefs in Keppel Bay J.S. Giazebrook and Effects of low salinity on 90 R. Van Woesik the tissues of hard corals Acropora spp., Pocillopora sp and Seriatopra sp from the Great Keppel region M.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunwater Dams Sunwater Makes a Significant Contribution to the Rural, Industrial, Energy, Mining and Urban Development of Queensland by Providing Water Solutions
    SunWater Dams SunWater makes a significant contribution to the rural, industrial, energy, mining and urban development of Queensland by providing water solutions. Over the past 80 years, SunWater has designed and managed the construction of 30 of Queensland’s dams, 82 weirs and barrages, 39 reservoirs and balancing storages and rural and bulk water infrastructure systems. Currently, SunWater owns and manages 19 dams in Queensland and each dam has been strategically built in existing river, stream or creek locations to serve the needs of the region. A dam is a critical component of a water supply scheme which can be made up of weirs and barrages, pumping stations, pipelines and channels, and drains. The overall scheme is designed to supply water for various purposes including town water supply, irrigation, electricity production, industrial i.e. power stations, mines, stock and groundwater supply. Water Supply Scheme Pipeline Industrial & Mining Dam Drain Pumping Station Channel Legend Balancing Storage SunWater Infrastructure Purpose of Water Supply Weir Irrigation Town Barrage Water Supply Dam Types The type of dam is defined by how the dam wall was constructed. Depending on the surrounding environment, SunWater dams can be described as one or more Scheme of the following: Pipeline Cania Dam Boondooma Dam Wuruma Dam Paradise Dam Julius Dam EMBANKMENT CONCRETE FACED MASS CONCRETE ROLLER COMPACTED MULTIPLE ARCH Industrial & Mining ROCKFILL GRAVITY CONCRETE GRAVITY CONCRETE Constructed as an Constructed as an BUTTRESS embankment of well Constructed using a Constructed in horizontal embankment of compacted Constructed as concrete compacted clay (earthfill) some large volume of layers of dryer than normal free-draining granular earth horizontal arches supported with rock on the faces (rockfill).
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-17 Volume 2 Proserpine River Water Supply Scheme
    Final Report SunWater Irrigation Price Review: 2012-17 Volume 2 Proserpine River Water Supply Scheme April 2012 Level 19, 12 Creek Street Brisbane Queensland 4000 GPO Box 2257 Brisbane Qld 4001 Telephone (07) 3222 0555 Facsimile (07) 3222 0599 [email protected] www.qca.org.au © Queensland Competition Authority 2012 The Queensland Competition Authority supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this document. The Queensland Competition Authority has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. Queensland Competition Authority Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE GLOSSARY III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IV 1. PROSERPINE RIVER WATER SUPPLY SCHEME 1 1.1 Scheme Description 1 1.2 Bulk Water Infrastructure 1 1.3 Network Service Plan 2 1.4 Consultation 3 2. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Draft Report 4 2.3 Submissions Received from Stakeholders on the Draft Report 6 2.4 Authority’s Response to Submissions Received on the Draft Report 6 3. PRICING FRAMEWORK 7 3.1 Tariff Structure 7 3.2 Water Use Forecasts 8 3.3 Tariff Groups 9 3.4 Kelsey Creek Water Board 10 3.5 Storage Rental Fees 10 4. RENEWALS ANNUITY 11 4.1 Background 11 4.2 SunWater’s Opening ARR Balance (1 July 2006) 12 4.3 Past Renewals Expenditure 13 4.4 Opening ARR Balance (at 1 July 2012) 16 4.5 Forecast Renewals Expenditure 17 4.6 SunWater’s Consultation with Customers 24 4.7 Allocation of Headworks Renewals Costs According to WAE Priority 25 4.8 Calculating the Renewals Annuity 29 5.
    [Show full text]
  • (Water) Policy 2009 Proserpine River, Whitsunday Island and O'connell River Basins
    Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009 Proserpine River, Whitsunday Island and O'Connell River Basins Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives Basins: 122, including all waters of the Proserpine River Basin and adjacent coastal waters 123, including all waters of the Whitsunday Island Basin and adjacent coastal waters 124, including all waters of the O'Connell River Basin and adjacent coastal waters Prepared by: Environmental Policy and Planning Division, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection © State of Queensland, 2013. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email [email protected]. August 2013 2 Main parts of this document
    [Show full text]