Temples in Antis in the Bronze and Iron Ages of the Levant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Temples in Antis in the Bronze and Iron Ages of the Levant TEMPLES IN ANTIS IN THE BRONZE AND IRON AGES OF THE LEVANT: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CASE STUDY OF RITUAL AND RELIGION IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Rebecca Louise Trow April 2015 2 ABSTRACT Temples in antis first appear in the Early Bronze Age in modern day Syria and gradually spread southwards through the rest of the Levant from the Middle Bronze Age onwards. In Syria, some temples in antis are still found in the Iron Age but they seem to be declining in popularity in this period. This research aims to provide a new definition of temples in antis across the Levant based not only on the architecture as in previous research, but also on the finds within the temples. Looking at the finds as well as the architecture allows a consideration of the nature of activities associated with these buildings, and a comparison between these temples and other types of temples will show whether they represent a new style of cult or simply a new style of architecture to house existing cults. Before considering the temples in antis specifically, this research first presents a summary of research into religion and ritual in archaeology, an area that has been sadly neglected in the past, allowing a definition of what we may be encountering in the case of these temples. It is hoped that this research will add to the recent wave of research on religion in archaeology, acting as a case study that shows how the archaeological remains of religion should be considered as an important piece of evidence allowing us to better understand ancient societies, rather than simply being ignored or treated as something of a joke. In the main part of this research, the entire corpus of temples in antis is collected, and then all the available data on finds from these temples are brought together for analysis. Because of the lack of data for many sites, four case study sites (Ebla, Tel Haror, Tell el-Hayyat and Hazor) were chosen which act as a base to which other, more poorly published sites may be compared. Conclusions based on this research are threefold considering: firstly, what can be determined about religion and ritual in the temple in antis; secondly, how these temples compare to other types of temples; and finally, how these temples, whatever they represent, may have spread. iii iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks must of course be given to my supervisor, Dr Bruce Routledge for his guidance and support not only during this research, but also throughout my university career. He has offered invaluable advice and all important perspective whenever I became swamped by information and lost sight of my objectives, and above all he has been patient and willing to read very rough drafts of this research and listen to my ramblings about various aspects of it without complaint. Special thanks must also go to my examiners, Dr Rachael Sparks and Dr Magnus Widell for taking the time to read the first submission of this thesis and for offering useful and productive feedback that has made it into the work it is today. I would also like to thank Bruce and my other site directors: Benjamin W. Porter, Katherine Adelsberger, Danielle S. Fatkin, and Stephanie H. Brown; at both the Dhiban Exploration and Development Project and the Busayra Cultural Heritage Project, for letting me spend my summers playing in the Jordanian dirt, reminding me each year why I love archaeology and the Near East so much. Finally, I am absolutely indebted to my parents for providing emotional support, a roof over my head, and for putting up with the many hours that I spent being antisocial, sitting in front of the computer, surrounded by books. Thank you for always being there and understanding (and for the many, many cups of tea that kept me sane over the past few years). v vi CONTENTS List of Figures ix List of Tables xi List of Graphs xiii 1. Introduction 1 2. The Archaeology of Religion 17 Previous Perspectives on Religion and Ritual 18 Sociological and Anthropological Approaches 19 Archaeological Approaches 24 Sacred Space 31 Summary-Identifying Ritual in the Archaeological Record 32 The spread of religion and ritual 32 Summary 39 3. Temple Architecture 41 Previous Research 41 Temple Building in Texts 50 Jerusalem (Solomon’s Temple) 51 Characteristics of the temple in antis 53 Terminology 54 Summary 56 4. Gazetteer of Temples in Antis 61 5. Case Studies 125 Ebla 125 Tel Haror 131 Tell el-Hayyat 143 Hazor 158 Summary 177 6. Comparative Temples 185 Tell el-Dab’a 185 Hazor C 187 Hazor F 189 Lachish 191 Nahariyah 194 Summary 195 7. Analysis of the Finds from all Temples 199 Ceramics 199 Small Finds 213 Faunal Material 219 Botanical Remains 223 8. Conclusions 227 Ritual activities in temples in antis 227 Comparison to other types of temples 230 The spread of the temples in antis 235 Summary 236 Abbreviations 237 Bibliography 239 vii viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1- Map of the Levant and Northern Egypt .................................................................... 3 Figure 2- Reconstruction of Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem ................................................. 52 Figure 3-Schematic plan of a typical temple in antis ............................................................... 56 Figure 4- Map of the northern Levant showing sites mentioned in the text ............................ 58 Figure 5- Map of the southern Levant showing sites mentioned in text .................................. 59 Figure 6- Tell Afis, Temple G ................................................................................................. 62 Figure 7- Tell Afis, Temple AI ................................................................................................ 63 Figure 8- The Acropolis Building at Ai ................................................................................... 64 Figure 9- The 'Ain Dara Temple, Final Phase ......................................................................... 66 Figure 10- Alalakh Temples .................................................................................................... 68 Figure 11- Aleppo "Temple of the Storm God" ....................................................................... 72 Figure 12- Tell Al-Rawda, Religious Complex ....................................................................... 73 Figure 13- Tell al-Rawda, unexcavated temples seen from geophysics results ...................... 74 Figure 14- Tall Bi'a Temple ..................................................................................................... 76 Figure 15- Byblos, Temple en L and Chapelle Orientale (right) ............................................. 78 Figure 16- Carchemish, "Temple of the Storm God" .............................................................. 80 Figure 17- Tell Chuera, Plan of the site showing location of temples .................................... 81 Figure 18- Tell Chuera, Aussenbau Nord, Tempel Nord, Kleiner, & Steinbau VI ................. 82 Figure 19- Tell Chuera, plan of the Steinbau Complex, Steinbau I-III ................................... 83 Figure 20- Plan of Ebla showing location of temples .............................................................. 84 Figure 21- Ebla, left to right: Temple B1, Temple N, and Sanctuary G3 ................................ 85 Figure 22- Ebla, three phases of the Area D temple ................................................................ 86 Figure 23- Ebla, Area P ........................................................................................................... 87 Figure 24- Ebla Area HH Temples .......................................................................................... 88 Figure 25- Emar, Twin Temples of Area E ............................................................................. 90 Figure 26- Emar, Second Temple (Left) and Temple of the Diviner (Right) .......................... 91 Figure 27- Halawa B, Building II (left) and Building I (right) ................................................ 93 Figure 28-Halawa A, Building I .............................................................................................. 94 Figure 29- Tel Haror Temple Area, left to right: Stratum V, Stratum IVb, Stratum IVa ........ 95 Figure 30- Tell el-Hayyat Temples, Phases 5-2 ....................................................................... 96 Figure 31- Plan of Hazor showing excavation areas with temples .......................................... 98 Figure 32- Hazor Area H Temple, Strata 3-1a ......................................................................... 99 Figure 33- Hazor Area A ....................................................................................................... 101 Figure 34- Tell Kabir Temple ................................................................................................ 104 Figure 35- The Tell Kittan Temples, Stratum V, Stratum IV, Stratum III ............................ 105 Figure 36- Mari, The Lion Temple ........................................................................................ 107 Figure 37- Megiddo, Early Bronze III-Middle Bronze I Sacred Area (Strata XVII-XIVa) .. 109 Figure 38- Megiddo, Middle Bronze II-Iron Age I Sacred Area Strata X-VIIa) ................... 111 Figure 39- Tall Munbāqa, Steinbau 1-3 ................................................................................. 112 Figure 40- The Pella Temples, Phases 1-6............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Tayinat's Building XVI: the Religious Dimensions and Significance of A
    Tayinat’s Building XVI: The Religious Dimensions and Significance of a Tripartite Temple at Neo-Assyrian Kunulua by Douglas Neal Petrovich A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto © Copyright by Douglas Neal Petrovich, 2016 Building XVI at Tell Tayinat: The Religious Dimensions and Significance of a Tripartite Temple at Neo-Assyrian Kunulua Douglas N. Petrovich Doctor of Philosophy Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto 2016 Abstract After the collapse of the Hittite Empire and most of the power structures in the Levant at the end of the Late Bronze Age, new kingdoms and powerful city-states arose to fill the vacuum over the course of the Iron Age. One new player that surfaced on the regional scene was the Kingdom of Palistin, which was centered at Kunulua, the ancient capital that has been identified positively with the site of Tell Tayinat in the Amuq Valley. The archaeological and epigraphical evidence that has surfaced in recent years has revealed that Palistin was a formidable kingdom, with numerous cities and territories having been enveloped within its orb. Kunulua and its kingdom eventually fell prey to the Neo-Assyrian Empire, which decimated the capital in 738 BC under Tiglath-pileser III. After Kunulua was rebuilt under Neo- Assyrian control, the city served as a provincial capital under Neo-Assyrian administration. Excavations of the 1930s uncovered a palatial district atop the tell, including a temple (Building II) that was adjacent to the main bit hilani palace of the king (Building I).
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating Power in the Bīt-Ḫilāni Palace
    Communicating Power in the Bīt-Ḫilāni Palace James F. Osborne Department of Near Eastern Studies Johns Hopkins University Gilman Hall 117 3400 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218 [email protected] Little is known about how the Syro-Anatolian kingdoms of the Mediterranean and Near Eastern Iron Age (ca. 1200–720 B.C.E.) operated politically. This paper examines the nature and extent of royal political authority in one such kingdom, the city-state known as Patina, and its capital city of Kunulua. Political power in Patina is studied through space syntax analysis of Kunulua’s bīt­ḫilāni palace, and through interpretation of the iconography that was used to portray palace furniture. Historical inscriptions and works of art made in the neighboring Assyrian Empire, with whom the Syro-Anatolian city-states had a great deal of cultural and political interaction, provide the bulk of our information regarding the visual makeup of the accoutrements within the bīt­ḫilāni. The architectural form of Kunulua’s palace, and the furniture and objects that populated it, are shown to have been conceived together as a coherent and totalizing message empha- sizing the legitimacy and power of the king. introduction the Tigris River to the east, whose capital cities of Nimrud, Khorsabad, and Nineveh provide us with uring the first centuries of the first millennium vivid textual and visual evidence for the interaction B.C.E., the northeast corner of the Mediter­ of the two cultures (fig. 1). Despite the large amount D ranean Sea was surrounded by a collection of historical information, as well as over a century of of small kingdoms that stretched from southern Cap­ archaeological excavation in the area, the political padocia to the northern Levant, and from Cilicia to processes that characterized Syro­Anatolian mechan­ the Jazira.
    [Show full text]
  • To What Extent Did Foreign Aspects Influence the Religion of the Judahites? Sanctuaries, Altars and Terracotta Figurines
    Stať / Article Acta Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni / To What Extent Did Foreign West Bohemian Review of Social Sciences & Humanities 2021, Vol. 13 (1), 1–18 Aspects Influence the Religion of DOI: https://doi.org/10.24132/actaff.2021.13.1.2 https://actaff.zcu.cz/ the Judahites? Sanctuaries, Altars ISSN 2336-6346 and Terracotta Figurines David Rafael Moulis* Charles University, Czech Republic Abstract The aim of this article is to understand the foreign influence on Iron Age Judahite sacred architecture, offering and incense altars and clay figurines in the context of the latest archaeological finds from Israel. The important discoveries from the recent years are the Judahite temple at Tel Moz.a, the two-horned Philistine altar from Gath and a “horse and rider” figurine from Moz.a. Searching and analyzing parallels to the archaeological evidence from other sites is key to interpreting them from a different perspective. The architecture of the sanctuary at Moz.a reflects in antis (North Syrian) style that is also known from the Biblical description of the Solomonic temple. Nonetheless, the Arad sanctuary is a mixture of Early Bronze and Iron Age elements. The horned altars from Beer-sheba and Dan or Megiddo in northern Israel are related to the Philistine type which originated in the Aegean region and in Egypt. The motive of horns can be observed across these cultures, but their interpretation could be different for each culture. Relatively small objects, the Judean Pillar figurines, replace older nude terracotta plaques from the Late Bronze Age known from Egypt, Mesopotamia and a variety of places in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualising the Vision a Study of the Plan of Ezekiel’S Temple
    Visualising the Vision A study of the plan of Ezekiel’s temple Konstantin Stijkel Cover page: Ashlars of the Western Wall of the temple mount. In the upper right corner an image of the floor plan of Ezekiel’s temple. © Copyright RCTM reclamebureau 2021 Vormgeving en druk: RCTM reclamebureau Richard Steunenberg Visualising the Vision A study of the plan of Ezekiel’s temple De visualisering van het visioen Een studie naar het plan van Ezechiëls tempel (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Protestantse Theologische Universiteit te Amsterdam - Groningen, op gezag van de rector, prof. dr. M.M. Jansen, ingevolge het besluit van het college van promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen te Groningen op vrijdag 18 juni 2021 om 12.30 uur door Konstantin Stijkel geboren op 5 februari 1945 te Berlijn Promotor: prof. dr. K. Spronk Tweede promotor: prof. dr. E. van Staalduine-Sulman Visualising the Vision A study of the plan of Ezekiel’s temple “Describe the temple to the house of Israel” (Ezek. 43:10) Table of contents Preface 14 Chapter 1. Introduction 16 1.1. Scope of the study 16 1.1.1. Reading and imaging Ezekiel’s temple vision 16 1.1.2. Envisaging the visionary character of the book Ezekiel 16 1.1.3. Architectural perspective of the study 17 1.2. State of the art 17 1.3. Thesis and research questions 19 1.4. Outline of the study 19 Chapter 1. Introduction 19 Chapter 2. The vision report 20 Chapter 3. On imagination 20 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Temple of Ain Da¯Ra in the Context of Imperial and Neo-Hittite Architecture and Art *
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Jens Kamlah (Hrsg.), Temple Building and Temple Cult. Architecture and Cultic Paraphernalia of Temples in the Levant (2.– 1. Mill. B.C.E.). Proceedings of a Conference on the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the Institute of Biblical Archaeology at the University of Tübingen, 28–30 May 2010 (Abhandlungen des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 41), Wiesbanden 2012, S. 41-54 The Temple of Ain Da¯ra in the Context of Imperial and Neo-Hittite Architecture and Art * Mirko Nova´k Ain Da¯ra is one of the largest pre-classical archaeological sites in the Afrı¯n valley in North- western Syria (Fig. 1). Situated close to the Turkish border at the bank of an important tributary of the Orontes River, it is famous for an impressive temple with its fine sculptural decoration on the outer fac¸ade and inner walls. The depictions of gods and animals carved in a Hittite style made it a unique feature in Syrian archaeology until the more recent discovery of the Storm-God temple in Aleppo. The archaeological site had been recognized in 1954 when the first sculptures were dis- covered. Excavations were conducted by the General Department of Antiquities and Museums in Damascus in 1956, 1962, 1964 under the responsibility of F. Seirafi and, after a longer interruption, 1976, 1978 and 1980 – 86 under the direction of A. ABU¯ ASSA¯F 1. Additionally, a lower town survey was undertaken in 1982 – 84 by an American team led by E. STONE and P. ZIMANSKY 2. The fast publication of a first volume made the architecture and decoration available to the public 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blackwell Companion to the Hebrew Bible Blackwell Companions to Religion
    The Blackwell Companion to the Hebrew Bible Blackwell Companions to Religion The Blackwell Companions to Religion series presents a collection of the most recent scholarship and knowledge about world religions. Each volume draws together newly commissioned essays by distinguished authors in the field, and is presented in a style which is accessible to undergraduate students, as well as scholars and the interested general reader. These volumes approach the subject in a creative and forward-thinking style, providing a forum in which leading scholars in the field can make their views and research available to a wider audience. Published 1. The Blackwell Companion to Judaism Edited by Jacob Neusner and Alan J. Avery-Peck 2. The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion Edited by Richard K. Fenn 3. The Blackwell Companion to the Hebrew Bible Edited by Leo G. Perdue Forthcoming The Blackwell Companion to Political Theology Edited by William T. Cavanaugh and Peter Scott The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism Edited by Gavin Flood The Blackwell Companion to Religious Ethics Edited by Charles Hallisey and William Schweiker The Blackwell Companion to Postmodern Theology Edited by Graham Ward The Blackwell Companion to Theology Edited by Gareth Jones The Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion Edited by Robert A. Segal The Blackwell Companion to the Hebrew Bible Edited by Leo G. Perdue Brite Divinity School Texas Christian University Copyright © Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001 Editorial matter and arrangement copyright © Leo G. Perdue 2001 The moral right of Leo G. Perdue to be identified as author of the Editorial Material has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Climb-The-Wall-Of-Uruk.Pdf
    Climb the Wall of Uruk... Essays in Honor of Petr Charvát from his Friends, Colleagues and Students Edited by Kateřina Šašková 2020 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Plzeň ISBN 978-80-261-0954-9 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni 2020 Foreword When I was asked ten years ago to make a contribution to the previous anthology in honor of Petr Charvát, it surprised me that my dear teacher and colleague – always full of energy and excited about new research goals – was already cele- brating his 60th birthday. Ten years have passed and Petr, having lost none of his enthusiasm, just celebrated his 70th birthday on January 12th, 2019. Petr’s scholarly interests are extremely wide-ranging. He studied Archaeology and History (1967–1968) and Assyriology and Archaeology (1969–1973) at the Faculty of Arts of Charles University in Prague. Two years later (1975), he re- ceived the title of PhDr. in Egyptian Archaeology at the Czechoslovak Institute of Egyptology at the same university, and in 1980 was awarded a Ph.D. in Medi- eval Archaeology. In these multiple disciplines, he has published several mono- graphs and a large number of studies recognized not only in his homeland but also in foreign scholarly circles. In 1995 he received his habilitation in Slavic Archaeology, and in the same year was awarded the title of DrSc. In 2011, he was appointed Professor of Czech and Czechoslovak history. From 1975 to 1990, he worked at the Archaeological Institute of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sci- ences (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic since 1992) in Prague, and later, from 1990 to 2005, at the Oriental Institute of the same institution.
    [Show full text]