Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. XSGRB_sample_arxiv c ESO 2018 2018-02-23 The X-shooter GRB afterglow legacy sample (XS-GRB)? J. Selsing1;??, D. Malesani1; 2; 3,y, P. Goldoni4,y, J. P. U. Fynbo1; 2,y, T. Krühler5,y, L. A. Antonelli6,y, M. Arabsalmani7; 8, J. Bolmer5; 9,y, Z. Cano10,y, L. Christensen1, S. Covino11,y, P. D’Avanzo11,y, V. D’Elia12,y, A. De Cia13, A. de Ugarte Postigo1; 10,y, H. Flores14,y, M. Friis15; 16, A. Gomboc17, J. Greiner5, P. Groot18, F. Hammer14, O.E. Hartoog19,y, K. E. Heintz1; 2; 20,y, J. Hjorth1,y, P. Jakobsson20,y, J. Japelj19,y, D. A. Kann10,y, L. Kaper19, C. Ledoux9, G. Leloudas1, A.J. Levan21,y, E. Maiorano22, A. Melandri11,y, B. Milvang-Jensen1; 2, E. Palazzi22, J. T. Palmerio23,y, D. A. Perley24,y, E. Pian22, S. Piranomonte6,y, G. Pugliese19,y, R. Sánchez-Ramírez25,y, S. Savaglio26, P. Schady5, S. Schulze27,y, J. Sollerman28, M. Sparre29,y, G. Tagliaferri11, N. R. Tanvir30,y, C. C. Thöne10, S.D. Vergani14,y, P. Vreeswijk18; 26,y, D. Watson1; 2,y, K. Wiersema21; 30,y, R. Wijers19, D. Xu31,y, and T. Zafar32 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received/ accepted ABSTRACT In this work we present spectra of all γ-ray burst (GRB) afterglows that have been promptly observed with the X-shooter spectrograph until 31=03=2017. In total, we obtained spectroscopic observations of 103 individual GRBs observed within 48 hours of the GRB trigger. Redshifts have been measured for 97 per cent of these, covering a redshift range from 0.059 to 7.84. Based on a set of observational selection criteria that minimize biases with regards to intrinsic properties of the GRBs, the follow-up effort has been focused on producing a homogeneous sample of 93 afterglow spectra for GRBs discovered by the Swift satellite. We here provide a public release of all the reduced spectra, including continuum estimates and telluric absorption corrections. For completeness, we also provide reductions for the 18 late-time observations of the underlying host galaxies. We provide an assessment of the degree of completeness with respect to the parent GRB population, in terms of the X-ray properties of the bursts in the sample and find that the sample presented here is representative of the full Swift sample. We constrain the fraction of dark bursts to be < 28 per cent and we confirm previous results that higher optical darkness is correlated with increased X-ray absorption. For the 42 bursts for which it is possible, we provide a measurement of the neutral hydrogen column density, increasing the total number of published HI column density measurements by ∼ 33 per cent. This dataset provides a unique resource to study the ISM across cosmic time, from the local progenitor surroundings to the intervening universe. Key words. Gamma-ray burst: general — Galaxies: high-redshift — ISM: general — Techniques: spectroscopic — Galaxies: star formation — catalogs 1. Introduction ati et al. 2008; Vergani et al. 2009; Prochaska et al. 2009; Hjorth & Bloom 2011; Rowlinson et al. 2017; Christensen et al. 2017). Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are bright glimpses of electromag- netic radiation that pierce through the universe, all the way from The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory (Swift) satellite (Gehrels the edges of the observable universe. They provide constraints et al. 2004, 2009), which was launched in 2004, has made it pos- on a very wide range of topics in astrophysics. Examples range sible to harvest much of the great potential in using GRBs as from small-scale phenomena relating to magnetars, properties probes of the intergalactic medium, which was already hinted of highly relativistic jets, hyper/supernova explosions, the inter- at by results from earlier missions (e.g., van Paradijs et al. stellar medium, dust extinction curves, starburst galaxies, chem- 2000; Ricker & Team 2004). With the three on-board instru- ical and molecular abundances, escape of ionizing radiation, the ments, the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT; Barthelmy et al. 2005), ionization state of the intergalactic medium, intervening absorp- the X-Ray Telescope (XRT; Burrows et al. 2005), and the Ul- arXiv:1802.07727v1 [astro-ph.HE] 21 Feb 2018 tion systems to standard candles in cosmology (e.g., Wijers et al. traViolet and Optical Telescope (UVOT; Roming et al. 2005), 1998; Savaglio 2006; Ghirlanda 2007; Molinari et al. 2007; Am- Swift is an ideal observatory for GRB hunting. A crucial as- pect of the success of the Swift mission has been the extensive ? ground-based follow-up observations of the afterglows and of Based on observations collected at the European Southern Obser- the host galaxies of the GRBs, involving a large community vatory, Paranal, Chile, Program IDs: 084.A-0260, 084.D-0265, 085.A- of researchers. This fruitful collaboration has been facilitated 0009, 086.A-0073, 087.A-0055, 088.A-0051, 089.A-0067, 090.A- 0088, 091.A-0877, 0091.C-0934, 092.A-0124, 092.D-0056, 092.D- by the open data access policy of the Swift mission. The close 0633, 093.A-0069, 094.A-0134, 095.A-0045, 095.B-0811, 096.A-0079, collaboration between detection facilities and electromagnetic 097.A-0036, 098.A-0136, and 098.A-0055. follow-up campaigns continue to be immensely rewarding, as ?? e-mail: [email protected] recently highlighted by the simultaneous detection of gravita- y On-call observer tional waves and light from the neutron star merger in the shape Article number, page 1 of 43 A&A proofs: manuscript no. XSGRB_sample_arxiv of GW170817/GRB170817A/AT2017gfo (Abbott et al. 2017; tribution. When investigating a specific distribution function, a LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al. 2017). high degree of completeness is desired (e.g., Perley et al. 2016b). In the beginning of the Swift era most of the follow-up af- In defining the selection criteria, we simultaneously aim to terglow spectroscopy was secured using low-resolution spectro- minimize any biases against intrinsic astrophysical conditions graphs (typically R = λ/∆λ<1000, e.g., Fynbo et al. 2009). while at the same time maximizing the likelihood of success- Spectroscopy is powerful as it allows us to secure information ful observations, hence allowing us to obtain a higher degree of even for very faint targets (Krühler et al. 2012). This allows completeness. By restricting the selection criteria to conditions the measurement of a number of important parameters such as local to the Milky Way and therefore independent of intrinsic redshifts, spectral slopes, and extinction. For a handful of very GRB properties, the aim is that the collected sample represents bright afterglows high-resolution (typically R>20000) spectra the underlying distribution of GRBs in a fair way. The selection have been secured, and for these events much more informa- criteria used here are based on previous, similar studies (Jakobs- tion about conditions inside the host galaxies were extracted son et al. 2006; Fynbo et al. 2009; Hjorth et al. 2012). We char- (e.g., Fiore et al. 2005; Thöne et al. 2007; Prochaska et al. 2007; acterize the sample completeness in Sect. 4.2. Vreeswijk et al. 2007; D’Elia et al. 2009; Castro-Tirado et al. The selection criteria that define a GRB as part of our initial 2010). statistical sample are: The X-shooter spectrograph (Vernet et al. 2011) was the first of the second generation instruments at the ESO Very Large 1. GRB trigger by BAT onboard the Swift satellite Telescope (VLT). It was designed very much with transient 2. XRT started observing within 10 minutes after the GRB; an follow-up in mind as the fading luminosities of such sources XRT position must be distributed within 12 hr. makes it urgent to secure as extensive wavelength coverage as 3. The target must be visible from Cerro Paranal for at least 60 minutes, 30 degrees above the horizon, with the Sun below possible in the shortest possible time. At the same time, the res- 1 olution was designed to be in the range 4000–9000 in order to −12 degrees . be able to get a large useful spectral range between the many 4. Galactic AV ≤ 0:5 mag according to the maps of Schlegel sky-background emission lines in the red and near-IR spectral et al.(1998). ranges. The near-IR spectral coverage allows for spectroscopic 5. No bright, nearby stars within 1:8 + 0:4 × exp[(20 − R)=2:05] observations of the highest redshift GRBs. arcsec, where R is the USNO magnitude of the star). In this paper, we present the results of a dedicated effort over Our ability to observe GRB afterglows is strongly depen- the years 2009 – 2017 to use the X-shooter spectrograph to se- dent on the timing and the precision of the target positions de- cure spectroscopic observations of afterglows and host galaxies livered by the triggering facilities. By selecting only bursts that of GRBs detected by Swift. We here make all the data result- have been triggered on board the Swift space telescope (Gehrels ing from the survey publicly available in reduced form (see Sect et al. 2004), based on the BAT, we start out with a sample where 3.7). burst characteristics are delivered immediately, allowing for an The paper is organized in the following way: In Sect.2 we informed follow-up strategy. However, the BAT sensitivity varies describe the sample including the sample selection criteria and across its field of view, so selection is not entirely homogeneous. the observational strategy. In Sect. 2.4, we describe the obser- Despite the complexity of the triggering mechanism on board vations and the instrumental setups, and in Sect.3 we detail the Swift (Band 2006; Coward et al.