ALBEMARLE COUNTY ROAD ORDERS 1744-1748 by Nathaniel
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Albemarle County in Virginia
^^m ITD ^ ^/-^7^ Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.arGhive.org/details/albemarlecountyiOOwood ALBEMARLE COUNTY IN VIIIGIMIA Giving some account of wHat it -was by nature, of \srHat it was made by man, and of some of tbe men wHo made it. By Rev. Edgar Woods " It is a solemn and to\acKing reflection, perpetually recurring. oy tHe -weaKness and insignificance of man, tHat -wKile His generations pass a-way into oblivion, -with all tKeir toils and ambitions, nature Holds on Her unvarying course, and pours out Her streams and rene-ws Her forests -witH undecaying activity, regardless of tHe fate of Her proud and perisHable Sovereign.**—^e/frey. E.NEW YORK .Lie LIBRARY rs526390 Copyright 1901 by Edgar Woods. • -• THE MicHiE Company, Printers, Charlottesville, Va. 1901. PREFACE. An examination of the records of the county for some in- formation, awakened curiosity in regard to its early settle- ment, and gradually led to a more extensive search. The fruits of this labor, it was thought, might be worthy of notice, and productive of pleasure, on a wider scale. There is a strong desire in most men to know who were their forefathers, whence they came, where they lived, and how they were occupied during their earthly sojourn. This desire is natural, apart from the requirements of business, or the promptings of vanity. The same inquisitiveness is felt in regard to places. Who first entered the farms that checker the surrounding landscape, cut down the forests that once covered it, and built the habitations scattered over its bosom? With the young, who are absorbed in the engagements of the present and the hopes of the future, this feeling may not act with much energy ; but as they advance in life, their thoughts turn back with growing persistency to the past, and they begin to start questions which perhaps there is no means of answering. -
Fort Necessity
FORT NECESSITY Washington NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD SITE PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF French and English Rivalry Virginians under Colonel Joshua Fry proceeded Virginians and Indians started for the camp of THE INTERIOR: Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary westward from Virginia toward Monongahela. Jumonville, the French commander, which was National Park Service, Arthur E. Demaray, Director Rival claims between the French and English Washington, then a lieutenant colonel, was sec situated about 2 miles to the northward. to the trans-Allegheny territory approached a ond in command. While Fry remained at Wills Jumonville was taken by surprise. Ten of his men were killed; one wounded. Jumonville was among those killed. Twenty-one survivors were made prisoners, one man escaping to carry the news to the French at Fort Duquesne. In Wash ington's command only one man was killed and Fort two wounded. The man who was killed was buried on the spot. Surrender of Fort Necessity Mount Washington Tavern, located a few Old tollgate house built in 1814 on Old National Pike, a hundred feet from the site of Fort Necessity few miles east of Fort Necessity After the Jumonville fight, Washington Necessity undertook to fortify his position at Great The month of June was spent in opening a fort and began the attack. The fighting, which Meadows. He built a palisade fort during the road from Fort Necessity to a clearing in the began about 11 o'clock in the morning, con last 2 days of May and the first day of June. forest, known as Gist's Plantation, in the direc tinued sporadically until about 8 o'clock at National Battlefield Site In his journal entry for June 25, Washington tion of the forks of the Ohio. -
Elim Plantation the Fry Family Built Their Home in What Was Then Orange, Or Perhaps Culpeper County Virginia
Elim Plantation The Fry family built their home in what was then Orange, or perhaps Culpeper county Virginia. The Biblical Elim was an oasis in the desert, a place where God showed his compassion to the thirsty refugees traveling out of Egypt, toward the Promised Land. Today Elim operates as an upscale Virginia Wine Country Bed and Breakfast - The Inn at Meander Plantation. Two plantations are attributed to Joshua Fry in the beautiful countryside surrounding the city of Charlottesville Virginia. Elim, located near the community of Locust Dale is about thirty-five miles north and east of Charlottesville. Viewmont is ten miles south of Charlottesville. Viewmont was probably built and occupied by the Joshua Fry family about 1744, when they moved west from Essex county Virginia to Albemarle County Virginia. Elim was constructed sometime between 1745 and 1766. Opinions differ on whether it was the home of Joshua Fry, or his son Henry Fry (my 5x great-grandfather). Henry Fry was married to Susan “Sukey” Walker in 1764, and Elim was the home where they raised their large family. The home remained in the hands of descendants (the Lightfoot family) into the early 1900s. The plantation was patented in 1726 by Col. Joshua Fry, a member of the House of Burgesses and professor at William and Mary. Col. Fry and his partner Peter Jefferson, father of Thomas Jefferson, surveyed and drew the first official map of the area known as Virginia. Fry commanded the Virginia Militia at the start of the French and Indian War, with George Washington as his second in command. -
Historical Documentation of the Site of Venture Richmond's Proposed
"Richmond, from the hill above the waterworks"; engraved by W.J. Bennett from a painting by G. Cooke; Published by Lewis P. Clover (New York) c. 1843 Historical Documentation of the Site of Venture Richmond’s Proposed Amphitheater By, Charles Pool For the Oregon Hill Home Improvement Council, Inc. Date: September 2013 1 Table of Contents: Introduction ………………………………..………………………………………………………………Page 3 The historic site …………………………………………………………………………………………..Page 6 Venture Richmond’s amphitheater proposal ………….…………………………………Page 10 Canal tow path historically 30 feet wide at this site ………..…………………………Page 13 Canal water elevation at 83 feet from 1840 ……………………………..……………….Page 19 Tow path at least two feet above water level in canal ……………..……………….Page 24 Canal 60 feet wide from 1838 ……………..……………………………………………………Page 27 Canal is a carefully engineered, impermeable structure …………………….……..Page 32 Sacrifice of slaves and immigrants ……………………………..……………………………..Page 36 Archaeological resources on the proposed amphitheater site ………………..…Page 38 Railroad tracks connecting Tredegar with Belle Isle ……………….………………….Page 44 Tredegar wall (anticipatory demolition?) ……………….………………………………..Page 49 Oregon Hill associations with the canal ………….………………………………………..Page 51 Zoning considerations ……………………………………………………………………………….Page 55 Plans for re-watering the James River and Kanawha Canal ……………………….Page 57 Alternative site for Venture Richmond’s largest stage ……………………………….Page 59 Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………..Page 60 2 (Figure 1.) View of Richmond from Hollywood Cemetery, (detail) 1854 (Source: Library of Virginia) The James River and Kanawha Canal provided vital transportation and water power for the development of Richmond. Introduction: It has been said that Richmond possesses such an embarrassment of historical riches that they are not fully appreciated. This is the case with the James River and Kanawha Canal, which is of profound importance nationally as one of the first canals in the nation with locks. -
Joshua Fry in Excerpts from the Rose
Joshua Fry in excepts from the Rose Diary 1746-1751 compiled and edited by Aubin Clarkson Hutchison, 1999 updated by Pamela Hutchison Garrett, February 2015 The Diary of Robert Rose, 1746-1751, was edited by the Rev. Ralph E. Fall of Port Royal, VA, who worked on the volume for twelve years. It adds considerable color to our story of Col. Joshua Fry. Rev. Fall served at historic Vaughter’s Church in Essex County, St. Asaph’s in Bowling Green, and St. Peter’s in Port Royal, VA. His wife, Elizabeth Stambaugh Fall, a Rose descendant, designed the dust jacket for the book. Murray Fontaine Rose of Falls Church, VA, a seventh-generation descendant of Parson Robert Rose, produced the map which accompanies the volume. It is unique in that authentic records for several hundred plantations, towns, and other sites were used to plot locations on present-day topography by the U.S. Geological Survey. The Rev. Robert Rose was born in Wester Alves, Scotland on 12 Feb 1704. He was minister of St. Anne's Parish, Essex County, Va., 1727-1748, and of St. Anne's Parish, Albemarle County, Va., 1748-1751. He was in Essex Co, VA when Vaughter’s Church was erected in 1731, where services still continue to this day. This is the Church where the body of our ancestor Dr. Paul Micou was reburied in 1966. Probably it was in Essex County that young parson Rose and Joshua Fry first became fast friends. A synopsis of the Diary, given at the Colonial Williamsburg website, highlights, “The diary reveals Rose as a planter, businessman, surveyor, doctor, and lawyer, as well as a minister and a frequent traveler between Albemarle and Essex counties. -
HISTORICAL NOTES from the RECORDS of AUGUSTA COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Part II (Concluded) by Charles E
HISTORICAL NOTES FROM THE RECORDS OF AUGUSTA COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Part II (Concluded) By Charles E. Kemper, Staunton, Va. Read by Charles I. Landis On February 3, 17138-39, William Hartgrove executed his note to Hugh McKown. The note contains this endorsement: "Lives at ye Forks of Octar- aro." William Anderson, a witness. Note was signed to John Trimble, April 3, 1742 William Hartgrove and John Trimble moved to Augusta County, Virginia, prior to 1750. Court papers 385. John and William Handly, weavers by trade, on March 14, 1746-7, execu- ted their bond to "Charles Tennett of Mill Creek Hundred and County of New Castle, Minister of the Gospel," for L. 26, 18 s. Bond witnessed by Thomas Cochran, Margaret Cochran and William McCue or McCord. In January 1748 Mr. Tenant assigned the note to Thos. Boggs when he was still living at Mill Creek Hundred, and Thomas Boggs in turn assigned the note to Thomas Thompson of Augusta County, Virginia. Thomas Thompson and certainly one of the Handlys moved to Augusta County prior to 1755. See Thompson vs. Handly. Court Papers, 401. Rev. Charles Tennett mentioned above was a brother to Rev. Gilbert Tennett, who was prominent among the early Presbyterian Ministers in Lancaster and Chester Counties, and in adjacent territory prior to 1750. This note shows that in the period 1745-50, Rev. Charles Tennett lived at Mill Creek Hundred in the present State of Delaware and probably purchased at that point. Peter Coughran (Cochran) was a resident of Lancaster County and prior to 1750 removed to Augusta County, Virginia. -
Jumonville Glen
obscure place." Did Jumonville hope to spy on Washington and report back to Contrecouer about the JUMONVILLE GLEN On May 28, 1754, a small group of Virginians, under the English strength and then make contact, or possibly command of 22-year-old George Washington, attacked even attack as Washington had feared? On the other a French patrol at what is now known as Jumonville hand, if Jumonville was on a military patrol rather than a Glen. Although only a few men became casualties, this diplomatic mission, why did he, an experienced officer, 15-minute skirmish deep in the North American wilder allow himself to be completely surprised at breakfast? ness was the first in a series of major events that even Washington's actions have also been questioned by tually plunged most of the western world into warfare. historians. If the French had in fact been merely Horace Walpole, a contemporary British statesman, diplomats, he was guilty of shooting down men who described the brief fight by saying, "A volley fired by a were only doing what Washington himself had done the young Virginian in the backwoods of America set the previous year at Fort LeBouef. This skirmish was the world on fire." first in Washington's career and he could not possibly help but be eager for success. He was also tired, having had little sleep in the previous 48 hours. Under these cir cumstances, his decision-making capability may have been hampered. It is possible only to speculate on the true answer. Nonetheless, dire consequences of both Jumonville's and Washington's actions at Jumonville Glen, as it is known today, soon followed. -
Extracts from the Journal of the United States Senate in All Cases Of
THE TRIAL OF SAMUEL CHASE, ONE OF THE ASSOCIATE JUS TICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, ON A CHARGE EXHIBITED BY THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES, FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. Friday, November 30, 1804. The Senate took into consideration the motion made yesterday, that a committee be appointed to prepare and report rules of proceed ings to be observed in cases of impeachment, and agreed thereto; and Ordered, That Messrs. Giles, Baldwin, Breckinridge, Stone, and Smith of Vermont be the committee. Friday, December 7, 1804. The committee last mentioned made report. Ordered, That it lie for consideration. Friday, December 14, 1804. High Court of Impeachments—The United States v. Samuel Chase. On motion, Resolved, That the Senate will, at 1 o'clock on this day, be ready to receive articles of impeachment against Samuel Chase, one of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, to be presented by the managers appointed by the House of Representa tives. Ordered, That the Secretary notify the House of Representatives accordingly. On motion, Resolved, That when the managers of the impeachment shall be introduced to the bar of the Senate, and shall have signified that they are ready to exhibit articles of impeachment against Samuel Chase, the President of the Senate shall direct the Sergeant at Arms to make proclamation, who shall, after making proclamation, repeat the following words: "All persons are commanded to keep silence, on pain of imprisonment, while the grand inquest of the Nation is exhibiting to the Senate of the United States articles of impeach ment against Samuel Chase, one of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States." After which the articles shall be exhibited ; and then the President of the Senate shall inform 35 56 CASES OF IMPEACHMENTS. -
States Become a Nation (1760-1800)
Virginia Becomes a State; States Become a Nation (1760-1800) Virginia History Series #7-07 © 2007 People of Virginia The number of people residing in the Virginia Colony increased by over 2 ½ times from 1760-1800. 53 Counties had formed in Virginia by 1760 1760 VA Counties were mostly on the coast (i.e., Tidewater) and inland along rivers like the James, Roanoke, York, Potomac, and Rappahannock (i.e., Piedmont) The “Fall Line” Separates Tidewater & Piedmont Regions in Virginia Tidewater Piedmont Fall Line Virginia Great Falls of the Potomac on the Virginia “Fall Line” Virginia’s Early Land Claims included present- day Kentucky, West Virginia and much of the “Northwest Territories”also claimed by other Colonies/States Virginia ceded its claims on Northwest Territories to the United States in 1783 Land Speculation In the 1760s, Virginian’s gentry-owned companies hoped to make money from land speculation on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers. The Ohio Company Ohio (which started work in 1754 and was River managed by George Mason) and the Land Mississippi Land Company (organized Speculation by Thomas Ludwell Lee, Francis Lightfoot Area Lee, Richard Henry Lee, William Lee, William and Henry Fitzhugh, Thomas Mississippi King Bullitt, and George Washington in 1763) River George’s sought title to millions of acres of Proclamation Western land through grants from King Line of 1763 George III. Instead of supporting land ventures by Virginia’s gentry, King George III hoped to set these lands aside for the Crown or English gentry and made a proclamation forbidding further settlement and speculation in British lands West of the Appalachians by colonial residents. -
Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] Carte De La Virginie Et Du Maryland Dressee sur la grande carte Angloise de Mrs. Josue Fry et Pierre Jefferson . 1755 Stock#: 40186 Map Maker: de Vaugondy Date: 1780 circa Place: Paris Color: Outline Color Condition: VG+ Size: 25.5 x 19 inches Price: SOLD Description: Nice example of the single sheet version of the seminal Fry-Jefferson map of Virginia and Maryland, engraved by Elisabeth Haussard and published in Paris by Robert De Vaugondy for the Atlas Universel. A well executed reduction of Joshua Fry and Peter Jefferson's landmark, which was originally issued separately and later appeared in Jefferys' American Atlas. The result is a beautiful single folio sheet example of the most sought after and recognizable 18th Century map of Virginia and Maryland. While the title is in French, virtually all of the place names and annotations are in English. The map provides a fabulously detailed look into pre-revolutionary war Virginia and Maryland, extending west to the Alleghany Mountains, and including Delaware and a portion of New Jersey, as well as the region around Philadelphia. Originally prepared by Joshua Fry of William & Mary and Peter Jefferson (father of President Thomas Jefferson) at the request of Lord Halifax in 1748, the Fry-Jefferson was a monumental leap forward in the mapping of the region. It is the first map to accurately depict the Blue Ridge Mountains and the first to lay down the colonial road system of Virginia. -
An Historical Account of the Old State House of Pennsylvania Now
Independence Hall, 1876. FRONT VIEW. AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT UK THE OLD STATE HOUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA NOW KNOWN AS THE HALL OF INDEPENDENCE « BY / FRANK M ETTING WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS BOSTON JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY 1876 Copyright, 1874, By FRANK M ETTING KIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE: •EREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY. PREFACE In the work that I had " found for my hand to do," it became necessary to examine carefully into the details of the building of the State House of Pennsylvania ; much that surprised me came to light not only in the circumstances of its erection but in its subsequent C history. Instead of Dr. Kearsley, to whom the credit had been as- cribed, I discovered that its Architect and actual Builder was one of the greatest men ever fostered by Pennsylvania ; and that every important movement, from the very inception of the efforts of the colonists to assert their constitutional liberty, first assumed shape either within this building or under the shadow of its walls. A friendly suggestion thrown out induced me to extend still further my investigations, with a view of preserving the information in print in some accessible form. This desire was enhanced by the hope that the general public would ultimately share in the interest which every brick of this old build- ing possesses for me, and thus be inclined to lend each his individual aid towards its preservation, and to insure its proper custodianship for all time. The desultory way in which, from causes unnecessary to be detailed, my memoranda have been thrown together, must leave its impress, and I cannot expect to be exempt from inaccuracies ; but having done my best without fee or reward, present or prospective, I have no apologies to make to the public for claiming their notice. -
Northwest Ordinance 1797- Above the Ohio River: OH, IN, IL, MI, WI
F304 Building America: The Pursuit of Land from 1607-1893 Class Notes 3 for: F304 Building America Northwest Territory- Northwest Ordinance 1797- Above the Ohio River: OH, IN, IL, MI, WI. Slavery was prohibited. It was considered to be one of the most important legislative acts of the Confederation Congress, it established the precedent by which the Federal government would be sovereign and expand westward with the admission of new states, rather than with the expansion of existing states and their established sovereignty under the Articles of Confederation. It was also precedent setting legislation with regard to American public domain lands. The U.S. Supreme Court recognized the authority of the Northwest Ordinance of 1789 within the applicable Northwest Territory as constitutional in Strader v. Graham, 51 U.S. 82, 96, 97 (1851), but did not extend the Ordinance to cover the respective states once they were admitted to the Union. The 1784 ordinance was criticized by George Washington in 1785 and James Monroe in 1786. Monroe convinced Congress to reconsider the proposed state boundaries; a review committee recommended repealing that part of the ordinance. Other politicians questioned the 1784 ordinance's plan for organizing governments in new states, and worried that the new states' relatively small sizes would undermine the original states' power in Congress. Other events such as the reluctance of states south of the Ohio River to cede their western claims resulted in a narrowed geographic focus. Territory: Kentucky- ceded from Virginia. Kentucky 1774-1810: Before 1775, the territory of Kentucky (and OH, IL, IN, MI, and WI) were all part of the colony of Virginia.