DOCSLIB.ORG

Answer Key 1. Why Is It Important to Know the History Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Answer Key 1. Why Is It Important to Know the History Of 4 Chapter 2 History Chapter Review Questions: Answer Key 1. Why is it important to know the history of your science? a. It is important to know the major players and events that formed your sub-discipline. b. Knowing where we came from gives us a better understanding of where we are now as scientists, and also where we are going in the future 2. Which civilization was the first to recognize the individualizing power of fingerprints? a. China 3. How did the invention of the microscope benefit the advancement of the science of fingerprint analysis? a. Observed the microscopic features and structures of fingerprints 4. How did Sir William Herschel contribute to the field of fingerprint analysis? a. H was the first British man to acknowledge the individualizing power of fingerprints 5. Which historical figure first published the concept that fingerprints are unique and may be useful for solving crimes? a. Dr. Henry Faulds 5 6. Who wrote the first book on fingerprints in eighteen ninety-two? a. Sir Francis Galton 7. What is fingerprint classification? a. A method of organizing criminal records so they may be found again in order to compare them with new arrests 8. Why was Bertillonage an inferior method of criminal identification to fingerprinting? a. Not individualizing 9. Who is responsible for developing the fingerprint classification system used primarily in English-speaking countries? a. Sir Edward Henry 10. What contributions did Juan Vucetich make to the science of fingerprint analysis? a. Realized the superiority of fingerprint identification to Bertillonage b. Developed a classification system in Argentina c. Trained the detective who solved the first crime using fingerprint evidence 11. What is AFIS? a. The Automated Fingerprint Identification System 6 Chapter 3 Physiology and Embryology Chapter Review Questions: Answer Key 1. How do we know that no two fingerprints are alike? a. Nature never repeats itself b. Natural variation 2. What is cell differentiation? a. A cell is given a biochemical signal that controls what type of cell it will become. 3. What is epigenetics, and what does it have to do with fingerprint development? a. Epigenetics is responsible for fingerprint unqiueness b. It is the study of things that control gene expression outside the genetic code itself c. Epigenetic factors influencing friction ridge growth may include the mother’s nutrition, disease, environmental factors, or the position and environment of the fetus in the uterus 4. Which layer of the skin is responsible for friction ridge generation? a. Basal layer 5. How are friction ridge cells formed? a. Mitosis in the basal layer splits one cell into two individual cells. b. The cells are pushed up to the surface Fundamentals of Fingerprint Analysis Chapter 2 History Created by Hillary Moses Daluz Why Study History? • Understanding of the past, present and future of the science • Certification tests • Courtroom testimony Ancient History • Designs in Paleolithic rocks may have been inspired by fingerprint patterns Ancient History • It is unknown when fingerprints were first used for identification purposes • Used in China as early as 206 BCE – Army rosters – IOUs – Engagements and divorces – Deeds for land and homes – Records of indenture – Evidence in criminal and civil disputes Fingerprint Science: 17th – 19th Centuries • Nehemiah Grew – First scientific analysis of friction ridges with a microscope (1684) Fingerprint Science: 17th – 19th Centuries • Sir William Herschel – Administrator for the East India Company in Bengal – Collected fingerprints and handprints on contracts – Recognized the uniqueness of fingerprints – Experimented with fingerprint permanence by fingerprinting himself over a period of 50 years Fingerprint Science: 17th – 19th Centuries • Dr. Henry Faulds – Medical missionary to India and Japan – First European to determine that fingerprints could be used to solve crimes Fingerprint Science: 17th – 19th Centuries • Sir Francis Galton – Wrote the first book on fingerprints – Described fingerprints as • Unique • Permanent – Also described minutiae (often called “Galton details”) Criminal Records and Classification • Classification – a method of organizing criminal records so they may be relocated in order to compare them with new arrests Criminal Records and Classification • Anthropometry – the measurement of biological characteristics Criminal Records and Classification • Bertillonage – a method of classification based on anatomical measurements of arrestees – Devised by Alphonse Bertillon – Measurements recorded on a Bertillonage card Criminal Records and Classification • Flaws with Bertillonage – Needed specialized measuring tools and cumbersome equipment – Does not take into consideration the proportions between height and limb length – Criminals would not remain still long enough to take the battery of measurements – NOT as individualizing as fingerprints Criminal Records and Classification • Bertillonage Criminal Records and Classification • Juan Vucetich – Identification Bureau in Buenos Aires, Argentina – Helped solve one of the first murders using bloody fingerprint evidence from a crime scene – Developed the first classification system – Still used today in mostly Spanish- speaking countries Criminal Records and Classification • Henry Classification (Chapter 4) – Developed by Sir Edward Henry, Rai Bahadur Hem Chandra Bose and Khan Bahadur Azizul Haque – Used throughout the English-speaking world Criminal Records and Classification • Henry Classification (Chapter 4) – Primary Henry Classification - represented in fraction form • Fingers with whorl patterns are given a numerical value • The sum of the even-numbered fingers is located in the numerator • The sum of the odd-numbered fingers is located in the denominator • The number one is added to the numerator and denominator Criminal Records and Classification • Henry Classification (Chapter 4) The 20th Century • 1901 - Scotland Yard established the first fingerprint bureau The 20th Century • 1903 – The New York State Prison System began routinely fingerprinting inmates The 20th Century • 1915 – The International Association for Criminal Identification, the first professional fingerprint organization, was founded in Oakland, CA – Later renamed the International Association for Identification The 20th Century • 1924 – J. Edgar Hoover established the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Identification Division, followed by the FBI Laboratory in 1932 The 20th Century • 1980s - Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) – Made possible by computer technology developed in the 1970s – Fingerprints were digitized, coded and stored – New method for storing, sorting and searching overwhelming numbers of criminal fingerprint records.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advances in Fingerprint Technology.Pdf
    Advances in Fingerprint Technology SECONDSECOND EDITIONEDITION CRC SERIES IN FORENSIC AND POLICE SCIENCE BARRY A. J. FISHER, Series Editor L.A. County Sheriff’s Department TECHNIQUES OF CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION Sixth Edition Barry A. J. Fisher SCIENTIFIC EXAMINATION OF QUESTIONED DOCUMENTS Revised Edition Ordway Hilton ADVANCES IN FINGERPRINT TECHNOLOGY Second Edition Henry C. Lee R. E. Gaensslen INSTRUMENTAL DATA FOR DRUG ANALYSIS Second Edition, Volumes 1–4 Terry Mills, III J. Conrad Roberson INSTRUMENTAL DATA FOR DRUG ANALYSIS Second Edition, Volume 5 Terry Mills, III J. Conrad Roberson H. Horton McCurdy William H. Wall INSTRUMENTAL DATA FOR DRUG ANALYSIS Second Edition, Volumes 6-7 Terry Mills, III J. Conrad Roberson William H. Wall Kevin L. Lothridge William D. McDougall Michael W. Gilbert Advances in Fingerprint Technology SECONDSECOND EDITIONEDITION EDITED BY Henry C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen CRC Press Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. 0923 FmFrame Page iv Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:10 PM Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Advances in fingerprint technology / edited by Henry C. Lee, R.E. Gaensslen.--2nd ed. p. cm -- (CRC series in forensic and police science) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8493-0923-9 (alk. paper) 1. Fingerprints. 2. Fingerprints--Data processing. I. Lee, Henry C. II. Gaensslen, R. E. (Robert E.) III. Series. HV6074 .A43 2001 363.25'8--dc21 2001025816 This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curragh Incident, March, 1914, Causes and Effects
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 8-1-1974 The Curragh Incident, March, 1914, causes and effects Edward R. Cummins University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Cummins, Edward R., "The Curragh Incident, March, 1914, causes and effects" (1974). Student Work. 398. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/398 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CURRAGH INCIDENT MARCH, 1914 CAUSES AND EFFECTS A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Edward R. Cummins August, 1974 UMI Number: EP73036 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73036 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Accepted for the faculty of the Graduate College of the University of Nebraska at Omaha, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Journal of Interdisciplinary Science Topics Predicting the First Recorded Set of Identical Fingerprints David Evans & Siobhan Parish The Centre for Interdisciplinary Science, University of Leicester 24/03/2015 Abstract Fingerprints have been used to identify criminals in the UK since the beginning of the 20th century, with 1901 marking the initial development of Scotland Yard’s fingerprint database. Since this time the UK database has continued to grow and now has approximately 7 million sets of fingerprints on record. Sir Francis Galton’s 1982 calculations stated that there is a 1 in 64 billion chance that two fingerprint sets are identical. Using these match probability calculations and the average yearly growth of the database, this paper shows that it will be at least 1,042,277 years before the British database will contain two sets of identical fingerprints. Introduction mathematical evidence that fingerprints were A fingerprint is an impression left by a special type unique to an individual. In his 1982 publication of skin found on the tips of a person’s fingers. This “Finger Prints” Galton’s calculations showed that skin, known as friction ridge skin, forms in the womb there was a 1 in 64 billion chance of two fingerprints during pregnancy and leaves a distinctive ridge sets being identical [1]. His work gave mathematical pattern that is unique to an individual. Due to this proof that fingerprints were unique to individuals individuality and the fact that they remain constant and lead Sir Edward Henry establishing the Henry throughout a person’s life [1] - providing the Classification system in 1901.
    [Show full text]
  • TRINITY COLLEGE MCMXIV-MCMXVIII Iuxta Fidem
    TRINITY COLLEGE MCMXIV-MCMXVIII Iuxta fidem defuncti sunt omnes isti non acceptis repromissionibus sed a longe [eas] aspicientes et salutantes et confitentes quia peregrini et hospites sunt super terram. (The Vulgate has ‘supra terram’, and includes the ‘eas’ which is missing from the inscription.) These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. (Hebrews 11: 13) Any further details of those commemorated would be gratefully received: please contact [email protected]. Details of those who appear not to have lost their lives in the First World War, e.g. Philip Gold, are given in italics. Adamson, William Allen, Melville Richard Howell Armstrong, Michael Richard Leader Born Nov. 23, 1884 at Sunderland, Agnew Born Nov. 27, 1889, at Armagh, Ireland. Northumberland. Son of William Adamson, Son of Henry Bruce Armstrong, of Deans Born Aug. 8, 1891, in Barnes, London. Son of Langham Tower, Sunderland., Sherborne Hill, Armagh. School, Cheltenham College. of Richard William Allen. Harrow School. School. Admitted as pensioner at Trinity, Admitted as pensioner at Trinity, June 25, Admitted as pensioner at Trinity, Oct. 1, June 25, 1904. BA 1907, MA 1911. 1908 (Mechanical Science Tripos). BA 1910. Aviator’s Certificate, Dec. 22, 1914. Captain, 6th Loyal North Lancs. Regiment, 1911. 2nd Lieutenant, Royal Field Artillery Lieutenant (Aeroplane Officer), Royal 6th Battalion. Killed in action in Iraq, April and Royal Engineers (150th Field Flying Corps. Killed in flying accident, 24, 1916. Commemorated at Basra Company).
    [Show full text]
  • The Fingerprint Detection (R)Evolution
    THINK.CHANGE.DO THE FINGERPRINT DETECTION (R)EVOLUTION Dr Xanthe Spindler Why fingerprints? • Rapid throughput • Maximise chances of identification • Potential for intelligence gathering http://www.moronail.net/img/2018_csi_keep_zooming_in_and_enhancing UTS: Centre for Forensic Science Why fingerprints? Complementary http://www.moronail.net/img/2018_csi_keep_zooming_in_and_enhancing UTS: Centre for Forensic Science Why fingerprints? • Unique • Immutable • Unchanging • Universal (almost!) • Easy to classify • Imprinted on everything we touch! UTS: Centre for Forensic Science The birth of fingerprinting • The incumbent: anthropometry • Challengers: – Sir William Herschel (India) – Dr Henry Fauld (Japan) – Sir Francis Galton (England) – Sir Edward Henry (England) – Dr Juan Vucetich (Argentina) UTS: Centre for Forensic Science The birth of fingerprinting 18911892 1894 19021903 1904 1912 1928 1957 1968 Will West William West UTS: Centre for Forensic Science So who stole the wine? UTS: Centre for Forensic Science So who stole the wine? Liana Claire UTS: Centre for Forensic Science Finding fingerprints UTS: Centre for Forensic Science The Challenge: To detect a miniscule amount of sample in situ without destroying or degrading the pattern UTS: Centre for Forensic Science Don’t believe everything you see... Bones (Season 6, Episode 5); Fox Network UTS: Centre for Forensic Science The real VMD N. Jones, Metal deposition techniques for the detection and enhancement of latent fingerprints on semi-porous surfaces, University of Technology, Sydney 2008 T. Merten, Alternative vacuum metal deposition methods for the detection of latent fingermarks, University of Technology, Sydney 2011 UTS: Centre for Forensic Science The nanoscale world MJ Choi et al., Forensic Science International, v. 173 pp 154-160 MJ Choi et al., Journal of Materials Science, v.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Henry and the South African Engine of Incarceration
    Work in progress – please do not cite 1 Edward Henry and the South African Engine of Incarceration Keith Breckenridge Colonial government, as English administrators sometimes acknowledged, had advantages of simplicity over Home Rule. One of these areas of advantage in India, at least before 1849, was in the handling of the problem of the “habitual criminal.” Before that date, the most serious criminals had their sentences tattooed onto their foreheads: life prisoners bore their names, sentences and the date of conviction, those convicted of belonging to the cult of assassins were marked by the word Thug, and, before 1817, forgers were imprinted with the Persian word for “liar” or “cheat.” But after 1850, under the weight of the humanitarian concerns of an emerging English public and the scientific expectations of government, administrators in India came to rely on registration processes similar to those of their metropolitan colleagues.1 The process of registration in India culminated in the publication of the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871. Under the terms of this law, entire nomadic and pastoralist communities were defined as criminals by descent. The law bound these people to particular places by entering their names into registers maintained by the district magistrates. The law required individuals who wanted to move away from their recorded place of residence to apply for a pass that specified an itinerary and duration of travel, listing the specific police stations that the bearer was required to visit during this period away from the district. In the villages falling under the act government appointed headmen were required to conduct inspections every evening to ensure that individuals had not absconded without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Dactyloscopy Over the Centuries
    https://doi.org/10.34836/pk.2019.303.2 FORENSIC PRACTICE Tomasz Szczepański, Ph.D. Forensic Laboratory, Internal Security Agency Dactyloscopy over the centuries Summary Dactyloscopy as a method of human identification has, at the end of the second decade of the 21st century, an established, strong position, demonstrating itself in the whole range of tools available to law enforcement authorities to support investigations. Thanks to the development and popularization of modern biometric technologies, dactyloscopy is increasingly entering the sphere of non-police applications, used by millions of people every day, e.g. logging into electronic banking or unlocking access to smartphones with a finger. In many cultures, the interest in finger and hand skin ridges goes back thousands of years. Initially, it concerned an intentional creative process in the form of rock drawings, but with time, features were noticed in fingerprints that allow to distinguish and identify people. This process began in China more than two thousand years ago, while Europeans did not pay attention to fingerprints until the 17th century. However, it was not until the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries that a real revolution has begun, which changed the ability to verify human identity. Key words: dactyloscopy, identification, history, fingerprints https://doi.org/10.34836/pk.2019.303.2 On the inside of the hands and feet of each person the investigation of a burglary scene described in there are visible features of the skin that are unique and the document from the Qin Dynasty – 221–206 B.C. different from any other in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Passing of the Bertillon System of Identification Raymond B
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 6 | Issue 3 Article 4 1915 Passing of the Bertillon System of Identification Raymond B. Fosdick Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Raymond B. Fosdick, Passing of the Bertillon System of Identification, 6 J. Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 363 (May 1915 to March 1916) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE PASSING OF THE BERTILLON SYSTEM OF IDENTIFICATION. RAymoND B. FOSDICK.' In the death of Alphonse Bertillon, in February, 1914, the an- thropometric method of identification probably suffered its final blow. For a decade his prestige and personality were the only supports of a system that in Europe, at least, had been fast losing ground. Persistently, even stubbornly, he endeavored to save the method which was the product of his genius and which bore his name, but he lived to see it discarded in nearly every country in Europe except his own. And even in France, now that the weight of his influence and his really compelling personality are gone, it is doubtful whether his system of identification will be continued. To realize the significance of this fact, it is necessary first to under- stand the importance of a system of identification in the problem -of crime detection.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Lab #2 History: Historical Figures and Anthropometry
    1 Lab #2 History: Historical Figures and Anthropometry Instructor’s Guide This laboratory has an optional Part II and Part III during which students have the opportunity to research specific historical figures and the requirements for fingerprint certification tests. These exercises could be used as take-home assignments or as laboratory exercises. Objectives • To learn about the contributions of historical figures to the science of fingerprint identification • To research fingerprint certification tests • To understand the importance of knowing the history behind the science of fingerprint identification • To explore anthropometric methods of identification Background Many historical figures have contributed to the science of fingerprint identification. It is important to be able to identify key historical figures and their 2 contributions to fingerprint analysis. A fingerprint analyst may be asked about the history of the science in a court of law or in professional certification and proficiency tests. Modern forensic scientists have the option of taking certification exams to certify their knowledge of not only their science, but also the development of the science. Historical figures and scientific achievements played a key role in the development of fingerprint analysis and criminal identification. One of the first methods of criminal identification was anthropometry: the identification of an individual using biological measurements. Bertillonage – named for Alphonse Bertillon – was the name given to the anthropometric method of identification and classification of arrestees. Measurements of body features such as the head, ears, arms and legs were compiled on a card known as a Bertillonage card. This card featured a photograph (what we now call a “mug shot”) surrounded by anthropometric measurements (Figure 2.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Police Work from Within
    Presented to the UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY by the ONTARIO LEGISLATIVE LIBRARY 1980 ^ POLICE WORK FROM WITHIN .u^^"". POLICE WORK FRdM WITHIN WITH SOME REFLECTIONS UPON WOMEN, THE LAW AND LAWYERS tC^v^^ BY HARGRAVE L. ADAM f' AUTHOR OF "WOMAN AND CRIME," "THE STORY OF CRIME," "THE POLICE ENCYCLOPEDIA," *'ORIENTAL CRIME," "THE INDIAN CRIMINAL," ETC. ETC. LONDON HOLDEN AND HARDINGHAM YORK BUILDINGS, ADELPHI, W.C_. _ FOREWORD I WISH to tender my sincere thanks to the various persons mentioned in the ensuing pages, where otherwise not acknowledged, for the valuable assis- tance they have so kindty rendered in the compila- tion of the present volume. To Mr. David Dewar, Procurator-Fiscal of Dundee, as will be seen, I am indebted for a very interesting preface. For the illustrations of the Photographic Department, Scot- land Yard, the Black Museum, the " Exhibit " in the Docks Murder case, the finger-print form, and that in connection with a finger-print incident, I am indebted to the courtesy of the pohce ; for that showing the pohce dogs of Paris I have to thank M. Lepine, formerly Chief of Pohce in Paris, and recently retired ; for that of Dr. Scott I am in- debted to that gentleman himself, and for the in- teresting addition to the Canham Read case to Ex- Inspector Reid, who had charge of the case at the time. The photographs of Sir Charles Darhng were taken at his town house, with his lordship's kindly consent and assistance. The photograph of Mus- well Lodge was taken soon after the murder; the building has since been demoUshed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook of Who Lived Where in Hampton Court Palace 1750 to 1950 Grace & Favour a Handbook of Who Lived Where in Hampton Court Palace 1750 to 1950
    Grace & Favour A handbook of who lived where in Hampton Court Palace 1750 to 1950 Grace & Favour A handbook of who lived where in Hampton Court Palace 1750 to 1950 Sarah E Parker Grace & Favour 1 Published by Historic Royal Palaces Hampton Court Palace Surrey KT8 9AU © Historic Royal Palaces, 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISBN 1 873993 50 1 Edited by Clare Murphy Copyedited by Anne Marriott Printed by City Digital Limited Front cover image © The National Library, Vienna Historic Royal Palaces is a registered charity (no. 1068852). www.hrp.org.uk 2 Grace & Favour Contents Acknowledgements 4 Preface 5 Abbreviations 7 Location of apartments 9 Introduction 14 A list of who lived where in Hampton Court Palace, 1750–1950 16 Appendix I: Possible residents whose apartments are unidentified 159 Appendix II: Senior office-holders employed at Hampton Court 163 Further reading 168 Index 170 Grace & Favour 3 Acknowledgements During the course of my research the trail was varied but never dull. I travelled across the country meeting many different people, none of whom had ever met me before, yet who invariably fetched me from the local station, drove me many miles, welcomed me into their homes and were extremely hospitable. I have encountered many people who generously gave up their valuable time and allowed, indeed, encouraged me to ask endless grace-and-favour-related questions.
    [Show full text]
  • SCAFO 27Th Annual Training Conference 2 3 OFFICERS 2018 PRESIDENT MESSAGE from Cindee Lozano Fullerton Police Dept
    WINTER 2019 theThe Official Publication of thePRINT Southern California Association of Fingerprint Officers An Association for Scientific Investigation and Identification Since 1937 SCAFO 27th Annual Training Conference 2 3 OFFICERS 2018 PRESIDENT MESSAGE FROM Cindee Lozano Fullerton Police Dept. (714) 738-3170 [email protected] CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Josie Mejia THE Los Angeles Sheriff’s Dept. (562) 345-4461 [email protected] FIRST VICE PRESIDENT Erika Jacobs Resources PRESIDENT Riverside County Sheriff’s Dept. (951) 329-9326 “Every man owes a part of his time and money to the business or industry in [email protected] which he is engaged. No man has a moral right to withohld his support from an SECOND VICE PRESIDENT organization that is striving to improve conditions within his sphere.” Jessica Callinan San Diego County Sheriff’s Dept. - President Theodore Rossevelt, 1908 (760) 806-4188 [email protected] For subscription or membership information, or address corections contact: SECRETARY Dear SCAFO Members and Readers of the PRINT, Amy Rodriguez Riverside District Attorney’s Office SCAFO SCAFO Secretary - Amy Rodriguez As 2018 is coming to a close, there are so many things to The Executive Board completed the updates and revisions (951) 955-5533 be grateful for. I am excited to announce that thirty new members of the By-Laws and will start updating the Policy & Procedures in [email protected] 3960 Orange Street joined SCAFO throughout the year of 2018. I would like to 2019. TREASURER Riverside, CA 92501 encourage each and every member to consider getting involved by Sheri Orellana Pomona Police Dept.
    [Show full text]