Family Names Among the Xhosa of South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Family Names Among the Xhosa of South Africa Family Names among the Xhosa of South Africa Bertie NEETHLING Introduction The population in South Africa is extremely diverse and many cultural or ethnic groups can be distinguished. The Xhosa people (or amaX- hosa) constitute one of these and form a significant group in terms of numbers: it is estimated that there are about 10 million Xhosa-speak- ing people in South Africa, making them the second biggest ethnic grouping with Zulu the biggest. The total population of South Africa is around 47 million. The Xhosa people speak Xhosa (or isiXhosa as the language is known in the Xhosa language). It forms part of the Nguni language family which is a sub-grouping of the huge Bantu language family, probably the most important Sub-Saharan language grouping in Africa. Although evidence is scant on the history of the amaXhosa, it is generally accepted that they originally moved down from Central Africa around the Great Lakes into Southern Africa and settled on the south-eastern coastline of present-day South Africa. Significant pock- ets of Xhosa-speakers are nowadays found all over the country. Xhosa speakers, like most other people all over the world, carry surnames nowadays but that was not always the case. The fact of the matter is that family names (also called surnames or last names1) have been introduced to African societies probably not that long ago. In other societies it goes back further, but one may assume that var- ious cultures and peoples went without surnames for generations. If one studies the history of old civilizations like those of the Egyptians and the Greeks, the history of the Roman Empire, and even the Bible, it becomes abundantly clear that a single name system was firmly in place originally. There were enough names for the popula- tion at the time to go around and a more complicated system was not necessary. 1 Family names and surnames will be used interchangeably in this contribution. 994566_ONOMA_44_07_Neethling_2.indd4566_ONOMA_44_07_Neethling_2.indd 110707 221/12/111/12/11 113:183:18 108 BERTIE NEETHLING The introduction of surnames The Romans were probably the first to introduce a system of more than one name for an individual (see Krige 1936, 8; Pine 1965, 11; De Stadler 1987,75). Three names were distinguished: – a praenomen or first name; – a nomen which indicated lineage or clan; – a cognomen, functioning more or less like family names today An example of such tria nomina would be Gaius Julius Ceasar. This system was implemented to counteract the inadequacy of the existing system. As the population increased, it became necessary to introduce secondary (additional) names to distinguish between the many indi- viduals that carried the same first (personal) name. Cottle, on English surnames (1967) remarks that some first names were gaining a tire- some popularity, especially Thomas after 1170 (inspired by Thomas Beckett). It was, however, only during the Middle Ages that a surname system was introduced by the Teutons when surnames became fash- ionable but also necessary because of the population growth. The cus- tom gradually spread across the Western world. According to Dorward (1995, v) scholars recognise in every culture a ‘surname period’ i.e. a stage when society becomes too complex to make it possible to iden- tify individuals by given name alone. Whether such a period could be recognised in an African context, is dubious. The first surnames appeared in Italy and France in the 10th cen- tury, but it was only from the 14th century that the system became commonplace in certain areas. In ‘peripheral’ areas like Wales many only received surnames in the 18th century. On 18 August 1811 Napo- leon decreed that all persons should be registered under a fixed sur- name. This was done in order to establish the manpower available for military purposes. In the Netherlands the House of Orange realised the value of the Napoleonic decree and followed suit with a similar decree on 25 November 1825 (see Nienaber 1955, 7-8). It was therefore only in the 19th century that some permanency arose particularly regarding spelling as well as the hereditary factor. In some areas this develop- ment came sooner. In England surnames had been compulsory in church registers since 1522 and from about 1730 onwards the system was well established, in spite of comments like the following one from Sir Joseph Jekyll: 994566_ONOMA_44_07_Neethling_2.indd4566_ONOMA_44_07_Neethling_2.indd 110808 221/12/111/12/11 113:183:18 FAMILY NAMES AMONG THE XHOSA OF SOUTH AFRICA 109 I am satisfied the usage of passing acts of Parliament for the taking upon one a surname is but modern, and that anyone may take upon him what surname, and as many surnames, as he pleases, without an Act of Parliament. (Nienaber 1975, 153) These secondary names were at first little more than nicknames, apply- ing only to the individuals concerned. As time went by, however, they slowly began to be passed down from one generation to the next. According to Weekley, people in the Middle Ages had a very carefree and even flippant attitude towards naming, particularly when com- pared with German: When we consider the beauty of the oldest of these [=Germanic] names, their picturesque connection with gods and heroes, war and wilds, and with the great elementary abstract concepts we no longer understand, and compare them with the name creations of the Romans, and still more of the Middle Ages, commonplace, prosaic, spiteful or obscene, we feel thankful that there was once an age of poetic bandits and imaginative pirates. (1916, 26) The French term surnom (‘nickname’) was adapted to ‘surname’ to describe the new hereditary family name. The ‘sur’ in ‘surname’ orig- inally comes from the Latin super which means ‘in addition/above’. A surname is essentially then an additional name (see Dunkling 1977, 58). Kaleta (1997, 51) also refers to the Latin term nomen gentile as ‘a name belonging to the same kin, family’. The rationale for bestowing a specific surname on an individual may differ; hence there is no fixed or formal rule when it comes to surname formation. Matthews remarks that it ‘…. is seldom an official affair’ (1967, 8). The creation of surnames appears to have been spon- taneous, and any distinction between individuals that carried the same first (personal) name, could serve the purpose of forming the basis for a surname. Strictly speaking then, all surnames are nicknames. One could therefore argue that family names could also be considered as additional names, which accommodated nicknames, but clearly, sur- names are fulfilling different functions at present, which justify their separate treatment. 994566_ONOMA_44_07_Neethling_2.indd4566_ONOMA_44_07_Neethling_2.indd 110909 221/12/111/12/11 113:183:18 110 BERTIE NEETHLING Surnames in Africa and among the Xhosa It is obviously extremely difficult to date the introduction of surnames into African society. The compelling factors, such as population growth with the resulting great number of individuals carrying the same first name, also applied to African communities. It is nonetheless interesting to note Madubuike’s observation that ‘from time immemo- rial Africans have always had a way of distinguishing people with the same names’ (1994, 7). Herbert’s observation (1996, 1223) in this regard, is also interesting. According to him the many references by ethnographers to surnames in Africa give no indication whether sur- names had always been part of an indigenous naming system, or whether it was imposed upon African societies through the efforts of the colonial administrators. Available sources on surnames usually cover the situation in the Western world, and more particularly, Britain and Europe. What is striking about these sources is that they all agree on the etymological types one can distinguish in surnames. Cottle (1967), Smith (1973), De Stadler (1987), Dorward (1995) and many others all cite the fol- lowing typology that establishes a pattern underlying the formation of surnames: a) Surnames derived from the name of the father/male forbear (occa- sionally the mother/female forebear); b) Surnames derived from the holder’s/forebear’s past or present place of residence; c) Surnames derived from an occupation; and d) Surnames derived from a characteristic of the holder, i.e. a descrip- tive (nick)name, or from prevailing circumstances at a given time. The obvious question now arises: what is the situation in African, and particularly Xhosa society? Not forgetting Madubuike’s earlier com- ment that Africans always had ways of distinguishing between people who carried the same first name, it is nevertheless interesting to note that he quotes the same typology ‘for the purposes of classification’, depending on how surnames were formed or derived. His book is called A Handbook of African Names, suggesting that this typology might be useful in describing the surname phenomenon in many other African societies. He makes the following provocative and certainly debatable statement: ‘An individual usually had all four such names 994566_ONOMA_44_07_Neethling_2.indd4566_ONOMA_44_07_Neethling_2.indd 111010 221/12/111/12/11 113:183:18 FAMILY NAMES AMONG THE XHOSA OF SOUTH AFRICA 111 [= types of surnames], although it is not necessary each time to iden- tify him by all of them’ (1994, 18). He may ostensibly have been guided by the situation in Nigeria, being a Nigerian himself. Koopman, in his recent book on Zulu names (2002), prefers the term ‘clan name’ to ‘surname’ when it comes to Zulu society. It is clear that Zulu clan names function as surnames. This may also cause confusion, because a Zulu individual may have more than one clan name, and hence more than one surname. In such cases where sur- names might be used interchangeably for one individual, the predict- able result can only be administrative chaos. Koopman also comes to the conclusion that ‘On the balance of evidence, it is fair to say that the origins of Euro Western surnames and the origins of Zulu clan names belong to decidedly different cultural patterns.
Recommended publications
  • Ing Items Have Been Registered
    ACCEPTANCES Page 1 of 20 October 2020 LoAR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN REGISTERED: ÆTHELMEARC Ælfra Long. Badge. Argent goutty de larmes, a winged domestic cat segreant purpure. Govindi of Dera Ghazi Khan. Badge. Argent, on a fess cotised azure three mullets Or. Nice badge! Morgaine de Clermont. Device. Per chevron throughout azure and argent, two fleurs-de-lys Or and a fox rampant guardant sable maintaining a four-leaf clover slipped vert. Artist’s note: Please include the details of the fox’s face and tail to improve identifiability. Rhiannon Elandris of Glyndyfrdwy. Badge. Vert, a gryphon passant queue-fourchy argent maintaining a sword proper, a bordure argent. Artist’s note: A sword proper would also have its quillons tinctured Or. We view the lack in this case a simple oversight. Rummy John. Name and device. Lozengy argent and sable, a cross of Santiago and a bordure gules. This name was submitted as Rummey John but changed at Kingdom to Rummy John to match the submitter’s preferred spelling. Commenters questioned the documentation presented from FamilySearch, but Memorantia Albion was able to find an example of Rummey in Journals of the House of Lords, Volume 10 (1647) found on Google Books at https://books.google.fi/books?id=5iQzAQAAMAAJ. There is a pattern in 16th century English names ending in ey also being written as simply ending in y; from Dictionary of Medieval Names from European Sources we find Audry/Audrey, Jeffry/Jeffrey, and Humphry/Humphrey. Given the precedent of 16th and early 17th century English surnames being used as given names, we are happy to register this given name with the submitter’s preferred spelling of Rummy.
    [Show full text]
  • Slaves in Lusitania: Identity, Demography and Social Relations Autor(Es): Curchin, Leonard A
    Slaves in Lusitania: identity, demography and social relations Autor(es): Curchin, Leonard A. Publicado por: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra URL persistente: URI:http://hdl.handle.net/10316.2/43447 DOI: DOI:https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8657_56_3 Accessed : 2-Oct-2021 05:49:58 A navegação consulta e descarregamento dos títulos inseridos nas Bibliotecas Digitais UC Digitalis, UC Pombalina e UC Impactum, pressupõem a aceitação plena e sem reservas dos Termos e Condições de Uso destas Bibliotecas Digitais, disponíveis em https://digitalis.uc.pt/pt-pt/termos. Conforme exposto nos referidos Termos e Condições de Uso, o descarregamento de títulos de acesso restrito requer uma licença válida de autorização devendo o utilizador aceder ao(s) documento(s) a partir de um endereço de IP da instituição detentora da supramencionada licença. Ao utilizador é apenas permitido o descarregamento para uso pessoal, pelo que o emprego do(s) título(s) descarregado(s) para outro fim, designadamente comercial, carece de autorização do respetivo autor ou editor da obra. Na medida em que todas as obras da UC Digitalis se encontram protegidas pelo Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos e demais legislação aplicável, toda a cópia, parcial ou total, deste documento, nos casos em que é legalmente admitida, deverá conter ou fazer-se acompanhar por este aviso. impactum.uc.pt digitalis.uc.pt Leonard A. Curchin Classical Studies. University of Waterloo (Canada) [email protected] SLAVES IN LUSITANIA: IDENTITY, DEMOGRAPHY AND SOCIAL RELATIONS “Conimbriga” LVI (2017) p. 75-108 https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8657_56_3 Summary: An analysis is made of inscriptions from Lusitania naming slaves, which is necessarily limited to persons explicitly identified as servi or the like.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study in Lexical Material Relating to Nicknames and Surnames
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN LEXICAL MATERIAL RELATING TO NICKNAMES AND SURNAMES By J. AQUILINA WE read in verse 19 of Chapter IT of Genesis that 'The Lord God having formed out of the ground all the beasts of the earth and all the fowls of the earth brought them to Adam to see what he would call them; For what­ soever Adam called any living creatures the same is its name'. This is the first historical record of man as a name-giver. As a name places a living, or non-living, creature, a thing or an idea, or any intellectual abstraction, within a context of recognizable reality of human experience in a way that it can be distinguished from others existing within the same, or different or kindred, category, we can say that names indi viduat­ ing realities or sUbjective reactions are indicative labels. In a sense the name is the thing or the person itself. Indeed, amongst savages the name is considered as an integral part of the person that bears it. As a rule, therefore, the savage prefers to be known rather by his substituted name than by his real name, the reason being that while one cannot harm him through the substituted name one can reach him and do him harm through his own name, which is his real personal identity. Hence the Maltese saying skond laqmek ghamlek 'A.s you are so is your surname'. Latin nomina omina 'names are omens', and a Kirundi saying [zina niryo muntu 'Le nom c'est l'homme' given by F .M.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bernard, Seth G., "Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C." (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 492. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Abstract MEN AT WORK: PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, LABOR, AND SOCIETY AT MID-REPUBLICAN ROME, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard C. Brian Rose, Supervisor of Dissertation This dissertation investigates how Rome organized and paid for the considerable amount of labor that went into the physical transformation of the Middle Republican city. In particular, it considers the role played by the cost of public construction in the socioeconomic history of the period, here defined as 390 to 168 B.C. During the Middle Republic period, Rome expanded its dominion first over Italy and then over the Mediterranean. As it developed into the political and economic capital of its world, the city itself went through transformative change, recognizable in a great deal of new public infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout Name Yourself Like a Roman (CLAS 160)
    NAME YOURSELF LIKE A ROMAN Choose Your Gender 0 Roman naming conventions differed for men and women, and the Romans didn’t conceive of other options or categories (at least for naming purposes!). For viri (men): Choose Your Praenomen (“first name”) 1 This is your personal name, just like modern American first names: Michael, Jonathan, Jason, etc. The Romans used a very limited number of first names and tended to be very conservative about them, reusing the same small number of names within families. In the Roman Republic, your major options are: Some of these names (Quintus, Sextus, • Appius • Manius • Servius Septimus, etc.) clearly originally referred • Aulus • Marcus • Sextus to birth order: Fifth, Sixth, Seventh. Others are related to important aspects of • Decimus • Numerius • Spurius Roman culture: the name Marcus probably • Gaius • Postumus • Statius comes from the god Mars and Tiberius from the river Tiber. Other are mysterious. • Gnaeus • Publius • Tiberius But over time, these names lost their • Lucius • Quintus • Titus original significance and became hereditary, with sons named after their • Mamercus • Septimus • Vibius father or another male relative. Choose Your Nomen (“family name”) 2 Your second name identifies you by gens: family or clan, much like our modern American last name. While praenomina vary between members of the same family, the nomen is consistent. Some famous nomina include Claudius, Cornelius, Fabius, Flavius, Julius, Junius, and Valerius. Side note: if an enslaved person was freed or a foreigner was granted citizenship, they were technically adopted into the family of their “patron,” and so received his nomen as well. De Boer 2020 OPTIONAL: Choose Your Cognomen (“nickname”) Many Romans had just a praenomen and a nomen, and it was customary and polite to address a 3 person by this combo (as in “hello, Marcus Tullius, how are you today?” “I am well, Gaius Julius, and you?”).
    [Show full text]
  • A Remark on the Name of the Emperor Lucius Aurelius Verus in Egypt 448 ADAM ŁUKASZEWICZ
    INSTITUT DES CULTURES MÉDITERRANÉENNES ET ORIENTALES DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XXVI 2013 ADAM ŁUKASZEWICZ A Remark on the Name of the Emperor Lucius Aurelius Verus in Egypt 448 ADAM ŁUKASZEWICZ In documents from Roman Egypt the emperor Lucius Aurelius Verus (AD 161–169)1 appears obviously as co-regent of Marcus Aurelius and is mentioned only together with Marcus Aurelius. In Greek papyri a frequent formula reads: Αὐτοκράτωρ Καῖσαρ Μάρκος Αὐρήλιος ʼΑντωνῖνος Σεβαστὸς καὶ Αὐτοκράτωρ Καῖσαρ Λούκιος Αὐρήλιος Οὐῆρος Σεβαστός.2 The occurrence of Lucius Verus is rare in Egyptian texts. As far as the Egyptian hieroglyphic inscriptions are considered, J. von Beckerath quotes only the examples from R. Lepsius’ Denkmäler.3 The name of Lucius Verus occurs as: Rwky Awrry wr-aA anx-Dt. The names printed in the Denkmäler were copied from three cartouches which are situ- ated on the southern wall in a small western temple of Marcus Aurelius at Philae, in a row together with the cartouches of Marcus Aurelius, with two preserved cartouches containing the titles Αὐτοκράτωρ Καῖσαρ: Awtkrtr Ksrs. Above these cartouches of Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus there is a fragment of a Greek inscription with a date (Pharmouthi 30 of an unknown year) referring to the joint rulers: ] κυρίων Αὐτοκρατόρων Φαρμοῦθι λ ἐπ΄ ἀγαθῷ. New instances of the name of Lucius Verus are available now in the publication by J. Hallof.4 They came from Kom Ombo and Philae. The inscriptions can be found in the main temple of Kom Ombo and in the gate of Hadrian at Philae.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roman in Name Only’, Eras Edition 13, Issue 2, June 2012
    Dustin Cranford, ‘A Roman in Name Only’, Eras Edition 13, Issue 2, June 2012 A Roman in Name Only: An Onomastic Study of Cultural Assimilation and Integration in Roman Spain Dustin Cranford (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA) Abstract: This paper studies the evolution of naming practices in Roman Spain as way to measure the limits of Romanization and determine the persistence of the indigenous culture. Onomastic evidence suggests that the indigenous population actively integrated itself into the Roman culture on its own terms, taking and leaving aspects of the Roman nomenclature at will in order to display romanitas, or Romanness. Upon close inspection, the names of many Hispano-Romans reveal a population that exhibited volition and agency in the process of Romanization. Variations in Roman naming components (e.g. voting tribes, filiations, tria nomina, etc.) show a selective adoption of the Roman nomenclature, while indigenous stems point to the persistence of many aspects of the indigenous culture. While there are many definitions and theories to Romanization, this study adopts what Leonard Curchin has described as the Integration Model, where the exchange between the Roman and indigenous culture produces a third, hybrid culture, or a provincial culture. Naming customs in Roman Spain point to the emergence of this provincial culture, one that adopted many features of Roman society, but equally preserved aspects of native Iberian customs. This study will explore various aspects of this topic, including the history of Roman Spain, the various parts of Roman nomenclature, and the actual onomastic evidence found in the Spanish provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family in Ancient China and Rome
    www.chinaandrome.org/english/essays The family in ancient China and Rome Sunny Y. Auyang The family, not the individual, was the basic unit of society in both ancient Rome and ancient China. In sociopolitical contexts, “family” took on a broad spectrum of meanings, many of which referred to entities much more extensive than the nuclear family of parents and siblings. Most broadly, it referred to a clan, a patrilineal group descend from a common ancestor whose members were identified by the same family name. In Rome, a clan was called a gens and its branch a familia.1 In Chinese, xing 姓 stood for both a clan and its family name. A branch of a clan was called a zong 宗 or zu 族.2 A related concept was the house, Roman domus and Chinese shi 室, which included not only biological relatives but also social dependents and physical properties. The relative importance of families in various societies is suggested by the naming systems. In many ancient cultures, a person had only one name with perhaps a patronymic, such as Jesus, son of Joseph, which conveyed very little information about family relationship. In contrast, a Roman or a Chinese had, besides a given name (praenomen or ming 名), a family name (nomen or xing 姓) and, if he was a aristocrat, a surname (cognomen or shi 氏) that kept track of clan branches. A Roman example: Julius was the nomen for the gens that claimed Trojan descend. A familia in the Julian clan adopted the cognomen Caesar. The most famous member of the Julius Caesar family had the praenomen Gaius.
    [Show full text]
  • Nameauth — Name Authority Mechanism for Consistency in Text and Index∗
    nameauth — Name authority mechanism for consistency in text and index∗ Charles P. Schaum† Released 2021/02/27 Abstract The nameauth package automates the correct formatting and indexing of names for professional writing. This aids the use of a name authority and the editing process without needing to retype name references. Contents 1 Quick Start2 2.7.2 Advanced Features.. 54 1.1 Introduction..........2 2.8 Name Decisions........ 57 1.2 How to Use the Manual...3 2.8.1 Making Decisions... 58 1.3 Task Dashboard.......4 2.8.2 Testing Decisions... 61 1.4 Basic Name Concepts....5 2.9 Alternate Name Macros... 64 1.5 Basic Interface........6 2.10 Longer Examples....... 67 1.6 Quick Interface........9 2.10.1 Hooks: Intro..... 67 1.7 Macro Overview....... 12 2.10.2 Hooks: Life Dates.. 68 1.8 Various Hints......... 13 2.10.3 Hooks: Advanced... 69 2.10.4 Customization.... 77 2 Detailed Usage 17 2.11 Technical Notes........ 79 2.1 Package Options....... 17 2.11.1 General........ 79 2.2 Naming Macros........ 21 2.11.2 Package Warnings.. 80 2.2.1 \Name and \Name* .. 21 2.11.3 Debugging/Errors.. 81 2.2.2 Forenames: \FName .. 22 2.11.4 Obsolete Syntax... 84 2.2.3 Variant Names.... 23 2.11.5 Name Patterns.... 85 2.3 Language Topics....... 25 2.11.6 Active Unicode.... 86 2.3.1 Affixes......... 25 2.11.7 LATEX Engines.... 88 2.3.2 Listing by Surname. 26 2.3.3 Eastern Names.... 26 3 Implementation 91 2.3.4 Particles.......
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Name Policy: from Theory to Practice
    Dysertacje Wydziału Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu 4 Justyna B. Walkowiak Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu Poznań 2016 Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Dysertacje Wydziału Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu 4 Justyna B. Walkowiak Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu Poznań 2016 Projekt okładki: Justyna B. Walkowiak Fotografia na okładce: © http://www.epaveldas.lt Recenzja: dr hab. Witold Maciejewski, prof. Uniwersytetu Humanistycznospołecznego SWPS Copyright by: Justyna B. Walkowiak Wydanie I, Poznań 2016 ISBN 978-83-946017-2-0 *DOI: 10.14746/9788394601720* Wydanie: Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań e-mail: [email protected] www.wn.amu.edu.pl Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................ 9 0. Introduction .............................................................................................. 13 0.1. What this book is about ..................................................................... 13 0.1.1. Policies do not equal law ............................................................ 14 0.1.2. Policies are conscious ................................................................. 16 0.1.3. Policies and society ..................................................................... 17 0.2. Language policy vs. name policy ...................................................... 19 0.2.1. Status planning ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Traditions: Studies in Archaeology, Comparative Linguistics and Narrative
    STUDIA CELTO-SLAVICA 6 Transforming Traditions: Studies in Archaeology, Comparative Linguistics and Narrative Maxim Fomin, Václav Blažek and Piotr Stalmaszczyk (editors) Proceedings of the Fifth International Colloquium of Societas Celto-Slavica held at Příbram, 26-29 July 2010 ABSTRACT Fomin, M., Blažek, V. & Stalmaszczyk, P., eds., 2006. Transforming Traditions: Studies in Archaeology, Comparative Linguistics and Narrative. Proceedings of the Fifth International Colloquium of Societas Celto-Slavica held at Přibram, 26-29 July 2010. Studia Celto-Slavica 6. 212 pp. Łódź. ISBN 978- 83-7525-726-7. This volume contains thirteen articles, ten of which were presented at the Fifth International Colloquium of Societas Celto-Slavica held at Příbram, 26-29 July 2010. The contributions include papers on a range of subjects relating to Celtic and Slavic early and modern linguistic data, their cultural and narrative traditions. In addition to papers on lexical and grammatical parallels between Celtic and Slavic languages, other subjects covered are mythological aspects of Irish narrative tradition, modern Welsh literature and language, and aspects of Breton grammar. The second part of the volume includes invited papers on Russian and Scottish Gaelic paremiology, early Irish pseudo-history and archaeological evidence relating to Celtic presence on the territory of the present day Ukraine. Maxim Fomin, Research Institute for Irish and Celtic Studies, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland Václav Blažek, Department of Linguistics and Baltic Languages,
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Names from the Roman Catacombs Eleazar Ha-Levi Eleazar [email protected] 2007 KWHSS
    Page 1 of 7 Jewish Names from the Roman Catacombs Eleazar ha-Levi [email protected] 2007 KWHSS The Jewish community of Rome is the oldest in Europe. The earliest Jews known to be in Rome were Jason ben Alexander and Eupolemus ben Johanan, sent there as envoys by Judah Macabbee1 in 161 B.C.E.2 Large numbers emigrated after Palestine was taken by Pompey, and Judea became a client kingdom in 63 B.C.E. By 59 B.C.E., the Jewish community was large enough that Cicero claimed that the number of Jews crowding the courtroom area during the trial of Flaccus, the proconsul of Asia, was enough to intimidate the jury.3 Judea became a Roman province in 6 C.E. The rebellion of 66-70 C.E., which resulted in the destruction of the Temple, and the Bar Kochba war of 132-136 C.E. swelled the community with refugees, prisoners, and slaves. A number of the oldest, extant Roman Jewish families: De’ Rossi, De’ Vecchi, De’ Pomi(s), Pintelli, and Anau, claim decent from prisoners or slaves brought to Rome at this time.4 Both Julius and Augustus Caesar granted rights to the Jews. Besides being allowed to send money to support the Temple in Jerusalem, they could become Roman citizens, and have lawsuits between Jews settled by Jewish, rather than Roman law. If the Roman’s monthly distribution of grain to the poor fell on the Sabbath, the portion allotted for the Jews was reserved until the next day.5 At the same time, Jews were regarded as a strange and barbarous people.
    [Show full text]