Nottingham Conservatives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nottingham Conservatives Local Government Boundary Review for the Nottingham City Council Local Authority Submission for Stage One (Public Consultation on new ward boundaries) on behalf of: Nottingham Conservatives September 2017 1 Contents Introduction 3 Background 4 Rationale and Methodology 5 Clifton and south of the River Trent 7 Wollaton; Lenton and University 12 City Centre and the Inner City 16 North Nottingham 24 Nottingham East and the Gedling Fringe 32 Appendix 1 40 Appendix 2 41 2 Introduction This is a submission of proposals for Stage One (Public Consultation on new ward boundaries) for the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s (the LGBCE) current Review of the Nottingham City Council Local Authority area. This submission is on behalf of the members of Nottingham Conservatives and the Conservative Group of Councillors on Nottingham City Council. The following pages contain a detailed proposed warding pattern for the entire Authority area along with justifications and arguments as to why Nottingham City Council should be restructured with this arrangement. These proposals have been assembled following consultation with members of Nottingham Conservatives from across the City and the Conservative Group of Councillors on Nottingham City Council. The Review was initiated following the identification of a number of wards in the Authority area that have evolved to have a variance of electors greater than the statutory +/-10% tolerance for electoral equality. These wards are: Bilborough: 12% Bridge: 25% Dunkirk & Lenton: -27% Wollaton East & Lenton Abbey: -34%. 3 Background The current warding arrangements for Nottingham City Council have existed since the 2000 Local Government Elections and many parts of the city area have changed substantially over the past seventeen years. As with any major metropolitan city, new developments and investment covering the commercial; residential; education and transport sectors have had a significant impact in the way in which different communities within the city have evolved. Some of these communities have changed very little or not at all; whilst others have changed significantly. In Nottingham, perhaps the most visible change to the city since the last electoral boundary review has been the reintroduction of trams to Nottingham’s streets in the form of Nottingham Express Transit. This first carried passengers from the north of the city to the City Centre in spring 2004; and then on to Clifton and the south of the city in August 2015. This has had a major impact on the way people travel across the city and has been a catalyst for change along the corridor which it serves. Overall, this submission proposes a new pattern of wards which hopes to reflect that evolving scene in Nottingham and has not been designed to just cover the minimal of amendments to the existing boundaries that would be required to rebalance the wards which no longer have an equality of electors. 4 Rationale and Methodology In April 2017 Nottingham Conservatives submitted a proposal for the City Council to continue to comprise 55 councillors. This was also the proposal submitted by Nottingham City Council and the LGBCE have announced that they will be seeking to assemble a warding pattern based around this number of councillors. Nottingham Conservatives received from the City Council the projected figures for the electorate for the entire Local Authority area. This forecasts that the Authority will represent 211,255 electors by 2023. With a Local Authority consisting of 55 councillors this equates to 3841 electors per councillor if every councillor is representing an equal number of constituents across the city. In order to allow for the structural +/-10% tolerance that is permitted with this target for electoral equality the proposals in this submission ensure that no councillor will be representing a number of electors greater than 4225 or less than 3457. Warding Strategy Following the changes outlined in the Background above, the overall strategy for constructing the wards in this Submission has been to move away from the existing three-member arrangement to a mostly two-member warding arrangement. This is due to the strong belief of Nottingham Conservatives that the current wards are too large geographically and swamp many of the diverse minority communities within them. This has the negative consequence of providing generally ineffective representation to the often complex issues that are prevalent in some of these communities. This is very evident in some of the existing wards such as Bridge; Mapperley; Clifton North and Radford & Park – all of which are examples of wards that combine communities with little or even no social cohesion; transport connectivity or any other tangible community ties. Even if a three-member warding approach was still adopted following the Review then whilst many of the existing wards would still satisfy the requirement of electoral equality (Radford & Park for instance) many would continue to breach the LGBCE’s other criteria of reflecting the interests and identities of local communities and promoting effective local government. Additionally, the Nottingham City Council Local Authority is unusual among its neighbouring core cities in that the entire Council is elected in one election (which normally takes place every four years) rather than “by thirds” (where one councillor per ward is normally elected on an annual basis.) This further reduces the case for continuing with the arrangements of three-member wards as a “by thirds” electoral cycle has never been adopted for Nottingham City Council and it is highly unlikely that such an electoral framework will be adopted in the future. 5 Methodology and Submission Structure Nottingham Conservatives proposal for the future electoral arrangements for Nottingham City Council can be summarised as follows: Continuation of 55 councillors to all be elected in one cycle every four years. (As per statutory requirements.) Assembly of 31 new wards in the following pattern: 1 three-member 22 two-member 8 single-member Approximately 3841 electors per councillor (with not more than 4225 or less than 3457 per councillor.) The numbers used to generate these proposals and help ensure electoral equality were provided by Nottingham City Council and these comprise the projected electorate for the Authority area in 2023, five years following the completion of the Review. Where possible, existing polling districts have been used to construct proposed wards. However where it has been necessary to split polling districts then a Street List (also provided by Nottingham City Council) has been used to calculate the total projected electorate. The submission is broken down into five broad sections that separately cover the main geographic components of the city. Within each section a list of the proposed wards is given along with their projected number of electors; proposed number of councillors and a justification as to why each is an acceptable ward. The justification is produced to suit the following criteria as outlined by the LGBCE: Delivering electoral equality for local voters. Reflecting the interests and identities of local communities. Promoting effective and convenient local government and reflecting electoral cycles. To support the argument for each ward (and provide clarification regarding where those wards should be) maps have been provided showing some of the identifiable communities within the city; as well as the proposed boundaries for the suggested wards. As stated in the Introduction, these proposals were assembled following consultation with the Conservative Group of councillors on Nottingham City Council and the members of Nottingham Conservatives who represent different parts of the city and interact closely with many of the local residents groups in their respective communities. 6 Clifton and south of the River Trent The areas of the City covered by the current Clifton North and Clifton South wards are perhaps the most geographically distinctive part of the Authority area due to it being the only area to lie south of the River Trent. This, coupled with the extensive Queens Drive/Lenton Industrial and Retail areas; as well as the large green space around the river near Clifton Bridge creates a natural boundary between this block and the rest of the City. The closest point in residential areas either side of the River Trent is on the north of the Wilford peninsular; however access between the two communities is still pedestrian-only (via Wilford Toll Bridge) or via tram which uses the same bridge. Reliable access between the communities south of the River Trent and the rest of the city is restricted almost to road transport only via Clifton Bridge on the A52 and A453 and this is not expected to change in the future. For these reasons, these proposals follow the rationale that the River Trent remains the boundary between wards south of the River Trent and wards in the rest of the city. The only significant change in connectivity here is the opening of the Nottingham Express Transit extension from Nottingham Railway Station south to Clifton in August 2015. Whilst this has had a positive impact on connectivity between Wilford; Clifton and the City Centre, and will continue to do so in the future, there is no evidence to assume that this impact will be substantial enough to consider proposing a ward which incorporates communities on both sides of the River Trent. (For example, The Meadows and Wilford.) Within the area to the south of the River Trent the following areas can be identified as distinct communities; either by natural boundary, or by demographic and community ties: 1. Wilford (including Wilford Village and the residential areas alongside Ruddington Lane.) 2. Silverdale. 3. Clifton Estate. 4. Clifton Grove (Fabis Drive Estate) 5. Nottingham Trent University Halls of Residence. (Clifton Campus). 6. Clifton Village. 7. Hartness Road Estate. 7 Figure 1A – General identifiable communities south of the River Trent. Under the current arrangements Wilford; Silverdale and the northern half of the Clifton Estate (including Clifton Grove) have been tied together in the Clifton North ward which is represented by three Councillors.
Recommended publications
  • Reason for Closure
    This branch is closing – but we're still here to help Our Mapperley Nottingham branch is closing on Friday 9 July 2021 Reasons for closure, and alternative ways to bank. This branch is closing – but your bank is always open This first booklet will help you understand why we’ve made the decision to close this branch. It also sets out the banking services and support that will be available to you after this branch has closed. In a second booklet, which will be available from the branch prior to it closing or online at home.barclays/ukbranchclosures, we'll share concerns and feedback from the local community. We'll also detail how we are helping people transition from using the branch with alternative ways to carry out their banking requirements. Here are the main reasons why the Mapperley Nottingham branch is closing: • The number of counter transactions has gone down in the previous 24 months, and additionally 89% of our branch customers also use other ways to do their banking such as online and by telephone • Customers using other ways to do their banking has increased by 14% since 2015 • In the past 12 months, 43% of this branch's customers have been using nearby branches • We’ve identified that only 125 customers use this branch exclusively for their banking Proposals to close any branch are made by the Barclays local leadership teams and verified at a national level ahead of any closure announcement. If you have any questions and concerns about these changes then please feel free to get in touch over the phone on 0345 7 345 345², with Adrian Davies, your Market Director for Local West.
    [Show full text]
  • Sneinton Walk/Photos Taken 1St – 8Th December 2020
    Walk No 17: Sneinton Walk/Photos taken 1st – 8th December 2020 This walk, of about 10km, goes over Trent Bridge and along Meadow Lane to Sneinton. It then goes up to Green’s Windmill – as I have taken long-distance photos of the windmill on a number of my walks I thought I ought to make it a Walk ‘destination’. Return via Lady Bay Bridge and WB town centre. Further Information on Sites along the Walk is in document 17.1 Go down Musters Road and over Trent Bridge (right side). Looking east, our destination is just about visible in the centre of this photo… …but better with a longer lens After crossing over Trent Bridge, land to the right is part of Sneinton Parish – see Further Info 1. Sneinton Parish So, we are just about to enter Sneinton. Go along London Road past the Turneys Court building. As noted in Walk 6, this was part of a leather works founded by brothers Edward and John Turney in 1881; however, this, the only remaining building, was built later (it does not appear on this map of 1899 so probably early 1900s). Indeed, there was an Inn where the building now stands. John Turney (later ‘Sir John’) lived at Adbolton Hall and was Sheriff and twice Mayor of Nottingham. Also of interest on the map is the presence of a branch from the canal serving a wharf within the leather works. A photo of the leather works, taken from the top of the Town Arms in 1898 (from ‘Turning Back the Pages in Old West Bridgford’, Dick Venner, Notts CC) Continue along London Road, crossing Meadow Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey, Item No: Wollaton West
    WARDS: WOLLATON EAST AND LENTON ABBEY, ITEM NO: WOLLATON WEST WOLLATON AND LENTON ABBEY AREA COMMITTEE 9 MARCH 2006 REPORT OF CHIEF RISK OFFICER NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL RESIDENTS SURVEY 2005 - IMPLICATIONS FOR WOLLATON AND LENTON ABBEY AREA COMMITTEE 1.0 SUMMARY 1.1 The report highlights the key Area 7 results of the 2 nd Market and Opinion Research International (MORI) Nottingham Resident Survey undertaken in October/November 2005. It provides robust data that reflects the perceptions of Area 7 residents on key quality of life, anti social behaviour and corporate satisfaction indicators/figures 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Committee: − Note the Area 7 findings − Note that Council Departments will analyse the data presented by Mori and integrate them into their service planning processes for 2006/2007 − Note that information from the survey is to be used to develop the Community Plan. 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3.1 In October/November 2005 MORI undertook Nottingham’s 2 nd Residents survey. The Council worked in partnership with One Nottingham who wished to engage city residents as part of the safer and stronger communities’ strand of Neighbourhood Renewal, focussing on local communities’ quality of life. In total 2,033 City residents took part of these 207 are Area 7 residents. 3.2 It is worth noting that the survey dealt with residents’ perceptions at the time the survey was conducted rather than facts . Residents’ perceptions, therefore, may not accurately represent the level and quality of services that are currently provided in Area 7 and Nottingham as a whole. One of the challenges will be to link these perceptions with other data that is available, for example, performance indicators or other measurements of service quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Broxtowe Matters Summercommunity 2019 in This Issue Clean-Up
    Broxtowe matters SummerCommunity 2019 In this issue Clean-up Live life to the full in Independent Living LEAN&GREEN C Broxtowe Borough Council CLEAN&GREEN Page 18 Broxtowe Borough Council Election Special Page 12 £25,000 for mental health projects Page 10 Teaching the next generation CLEAN&GREEN Broxtowe Borough Council As part of our Clean and Green Campaign, our Recycling Team have been out and about recently visiting local schoolchildren to help them learn about recycling and protecting the environment for the future. Read more on Page 14. www.broxtowe.gov.uk www.broxtowe.gov.uk Local care from a local company Call us on: 0115 9226116 www.homeinstead.co.uk/Nottingham Home Instead Senior Care, is an award-winning local company specialising in providing care to people in their own homes. The company opened its office in Nottingham over 8 years ago and provides a full range of services to help people of all ages remain independent. Recommended highly by the Care Quality Commission for their level of quality service and positive client testimonials. Home Instead delivers care to clients across Nottingham with a wide range of needs. Caregivers have practical experience in supporting clients with conditions such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Diabetes. The Home Instead Senior Care service allows people to remain at home and lead an independent life. From a few hours a day, up to 24 hours 7 days a week Mrs Catherine B and CAREGiver Joy, winners of the we provide a full care service to match the needs of the individual.
    [Show full text]
  • 276A Sneinton Dale Nottingham NG3 7DN 193 Sq M (2,078 Sq Ft) on 0.08 Acres
    FOR SALE Freehold Development Opportunity S.T.P. 276a Sneinton Dale Nottingham NG3 7DN 193 sq m (2,078 sq ft) on 0.08 acres • Rare freehold opportunity • Ample parking PICTURE • Self-contained secure site • Recently refurbished NG Chartered Surveyors Unit 8 | Wheatcroft Business Park | Landmere Lane | Edwalton | Nottingham | NG12 4DG 276a Sneinton Dale Nottingham NG3 7DN LOCATION SERVICES The property is located in Sneinton, a suburb of Nottingham, two All mains services are evident within the property, but we can miles east of Nottingham City Centre. The property is set back off provide no warranty with regard to the capacity or connectivity. Sneinton Dale and accessed via a shared access road overlooking allotments. EPC The property has an EPC rating of 76 falling within band ‘D’. DESCRIPTION The property is of two-storey solid brick construction and is OVERAGE PROVISION currently being used as an Education Centre. Internally, the The Title includes an overage provision in the event of residential property comprises a series of cellular and open plan redevelopment. Please contact the marketing agents for further accommodation, with lighting provided by fluorescent strip tubes details. and heating via a traditional wet system. BUSINESS RATES Access to the property is via a shared access road which leads to Charging Authority: Nottingham City Council ample parking to accommodate up to 5 vehicles, alongside a Description: Offices and premises garage for additional storage. Rateable Value: £10,750 Period: 2020/21 ACCOMMODATION The property has the following approximate net internal floor PRICE area, measured in accordance with the RICS Code of Measuring Offers in excess of £250,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Summer Events Broadmarsh Update And
    Paper Height 628.0mm Height Paper Y M C Y M C BB Y M C Y M C B YY M C B 20 B 40 B 80 B Y 13.0mm 13.0mm M −− 29 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 30 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 31 32 C B M Y M C B Y Y 20 Y 40 Y 80 M C 148.0 x 210.0mm x 148.0 210.0mm x 148.0 210.0mm x 148.0 B 210.0mm x 148.0 C Y M C B 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm M 20 M 40 M 80 Y M C B Y M C B 6.0mm 6.0mm C 20 C 40 C 80 Y M C B Y M C B Y M C Y M C Y M −−−− 22 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 23 24 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 25 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 26 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 27 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 28 −−−−−−−−−−−−− Y M C BB Y M 148.0 x 210.0mm x 148.0 210.0mm x 148.0 210.0mm x 148.0 210.0mm x 148.0 C B 20 B 40 B 80 B Y M C 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm B Lin+ Process YY M C B Y 80 12.0mm 12.0mm Paper Width 890.0mm 0/100% 1% 2% 3% 5% 10% 20% 25% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 75% 80% 90% 95% 97% 98% 99% Prinect CS−4i Format 102/105 Dipco 16.0d (pdf) © 2013 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG 0.5P 1P Times 2P Times 4P Times Times M 20 Times 4 P Times 2 P Times 1 P Times 0.5 P Y M −−−− 15 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 16 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 17 18 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 19 20 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 21 −−−−−−−−−−− C B C Y M C B 1/15 C 20 C 40 C 80 Y 148.0 x 210.0mm 148.0 x 210.0mm M 148.0 x 210.0mm 148.0 x 210.0mm C BB Y M 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm C B Y M C Y M C V15.0i (pdf) Fujifilm Suprasetter Y Brillia LH−PJE C Plate Control Strip © Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG 2013 Y M C B YY 6.0mm 6.0mm M C Summer 2019 DPI Acrobat Distiller 9.0.0 B 20 B 40 B 80 B Nottingham /mynottingham @mynottingham Y M C User: Heidelberg Druckmaschinen AG Liz.: 6EU240708 B Y Copyright Fogra 2008 Res.: 2400 M C B Y Y 20 Y 40 Y 80 −−−−−−−− 8 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−
    [Show full text]
  • Councillor Annual Report 2015-16
    Councillor Annual Report 2015-16 Name: Cllr Sam Webster I was first elected in April 2013 to represent the Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey Ward and re-elected in May 2015. The ward includes University Park and Jubilee Campus. I have a work background in the apprenticeships and skills sector. As well as representing my ward I have additional responsibilities as Portfolio Holder for Education, Employment and Skills. I am a Nottingham City Council appointed Director of: Futures Advice, Skills and Employment Scape Group Blueprint Regeneration I am also a Director of Nottingham Credit Union elected by members. I am joint Chair of the Nottingham City Children’s Partnership Board I also sit on the following committees, boards and governing bodies: Executive Board Corporate Parenting Board, Appointments and Conditions of Service Committee Wollaton and Lenton Abbey Area Committee N2 Employment and Skills Board Nottingham Education Trust Nottingham High School Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities (SIGOMA) Standing Committee for Religious Education (SACRE) Learning Disabilities Partnership Board School Admissions Forum 4. Ward Work and Achievements I and my fellow ward councillor, Sally Longford, hold regular surgeries to allow residents to meet with us and raise issues, concerns and cases. Surgeries take place on the 2nd Tuesday of every month at Sheila Roper Community Centre in Lenton Abbey (6pm – 7pm) and 4th Saturday of every month at Wollaton Park Community Centre on Harrow Road (11am-12pm). We have also held surgeries at University Park and we both sit on the Student Issues group along with representatives of the Student Unions. We try to be as accessible as possible and use social media to engage and interact with residents as well as more traditional communication by telephone, email and post.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire Pharmacy Opening Times August Bank Holiday 2020
    Nottinghamshire Pharmacy Opening Times August Bank Holiday 2020 Friday 25 December Monday 28 Friday 1 January Telephone Pharmacy Name Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Postcode 2020 December 2020 2021 Number Christmas Day Boxing Day New Year’s Day Long Eaton, Asda Pharmacy Midland Street NG10 1NY 0115 9836110 Closed 09:00-18:00 10:00-17:00 Nottinghamshire Sutton in Ashfield, Asda Pharmacy Priestsic Road NG17 2AH 01623 523010 Closed 09:00-18:00 10:00-17:00 Nottinghamshire Old Mill Lane, Forest Mansfield, Asda Pharmacy NG19 8QT 01623 676710 Closed 09:00-18:00 10:00-17:00 Town Nottinghamshire 184 Loughborough Asda Pharmacy West Bridgford Nottingham NG2 7JA 0115 969 4210 Closed 09:00-18:00 10:00-17:00 Road Newark, 01636 662410 Asda Pharmacy Lombard Street NG24 1XG Closed 09:00-18:00 10:00-17:00 Nottinghamshire ext 319 Asda Pharmacy 111-127 Front Street Arnold Nottingham NG5 7ED 0115 964 9110 Closed 09:00-18:00 10:00-17:00 Asda Pharmacy Radford Road Hyson Green Nottingham NG7 5DU 0115 900 2510 Closed 09:00-18:00 10:00-17:00 Bingham, Bingham Pharmacy 23 Eaton Place NG13 8BD 01949 839978 12:00-14:00 Closed Closed Nottinghamshire 11-19 Lower Boots Pharmacy INTU Victoria Centre Nottingham NG1 3QS 0115 941 0199 Closed 07:00-18:00 Closed Parliament Street 2 Broadmarsh Boots Pharmacy 40 Lister Gate Nottingham NG1 7LB 0115 950 7381 Closed 10:00-16:00 Closed Centre Giltbrook Retail Park, Giltbrook, Boots Pharmacy Giltbrook NG16 2RP 0115 938 6050 Closed 08:00-18:00 11:00-17:00 Ikea Way Nottinghamshire Unit 1, St Peters Retail Mansfield, Boots Pharmacy NG18
    [Show full text]
  • 17 MAY - 12 JUNE 2016 @Neatfestival #Neat16 Neat16 Media Partners Cover Image: the James Plays (See P42)
    17 MAY - 12 JUNE 2016 www.neatfestival.com @neatfestival #neat16 neat16 Media Partners Cover image: The James Plays (see p42) neat16 Brochure Sponsors neat16 Collaborators and Venues WELCOME ... to neat16 – a festival for everyone celebrating the extraordinary cultural life of Nottingham – from our amazing spaces and events to our status as a UNESCO City of Literature. neat16 promises to be fascinating, entertaining, sometimes challenging and always uplifting. It will showcase the best of every art-form and offer you a remarkable choice – new writing or re-imagined classics, grand opera or contemporary art, new talent or old masters, hip-hop or household names. We can't wait to give you that tantalising choice in a city that brings culture alive, and inspires great creativity. VENUE KEY BG - Backlit Gallery NLA - Nottingham Lakeside Arts BC - Broadway Cinema NP - Nottingham Playhouse BHL - Bromley House Library NVA - The National Videogame Arcade BS - Venues on & around Broad St in Hockley N_SPACE - Nonsuch Theatre’s space DCAT - Djanogly City Academy Theatre TRCH - Theatre Royal + Royal Concert Hall GOJ - Galleries of Justice Museum P - Primary NAE - New Art Exchange RT - Rough Trade, Nottingham NC - Nottingham Contemporary V - Various locations, Nottingham City centre NCM - Nottingham Castle Museum WWW.NEATFESTIVAL.COM | @NEATFESTIVAL | #NEAT16 03 FESTIVAL DIARY MAY DATE EVENT TIME VENUE PAGE Tue 17 Altitude Sickness 2pm & 8pm NLA 8 Breakin’ Convention 7.30pm TRCH 7 Wed 18 Breakin’ Convention 7.30pm TRCH 7 The Arild Andersen Trio 8pm
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham City Council Response to the Local Government Boundary
    Nottingham City Council Response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England draft recommendations on new electoral arrangements for the City of Nottingham 1 Contents Page Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Draft Recommendations of the LGBCE 4 3. Considerations informing our revised Warding Proposal 6 4. Summary of Counter Proposals to LGBCE Draft Electoral Arrangements 9 5. Detailed Counter Proposals: 5.1 Castle Ward and Radford Ward 13 5.2 Clifton East and Clifton West Wards 18 5.3 Hyson Green & Arboretum Ward 22 5.4 Meadows Ward 26 6. Conclusion 30 Appendices: Appendix 1: Nottingham City Council – Current Warding Arrangement 31 Appendix 2: Summary of LGBCE Proposals and NCC response 32 Appendix 3: Potential Cost to Nottingham City Council of LGBCE Draft 33 Recommendations Appendix 4: Equality Impact Assessment on LGBCE proposals Appendix 5: Equality Impact Assessment on Nottingham City Council proposals 2 Executive Summary i) This proposal is a response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (“LGBCE”) Draft Recommendations for Nottingham City, published on 31st October 2017. ii) Like the LGBCE, the Council supports the proposal for 55 Councillors, but across 20 three and two member wards rather than the 23 wards proposed by the LGBCE. iii) The City Council is proposing a warding pattern of 15 wards represented by three- members and 5 wards represented by two-members. Our counter proposal accepts 15 of the ward boundaries proposed by the LGBCE and seeks to bring together the remaining boundaries suggested by the LGBCE to maintain the important principle of multi member wards. iv) Our proposed warding pattern meets the commission’s statutory criteria in respect of improving electoral equality, representing community identities and interests and providing for convenient and effective local government.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuffield Health Fitness & Wellbeing Centre, Nottingham
    Nuffield Health Fitness & Wellbeing Centre, Nottingham Address Turn left on to the A6514 Nuffield Health Fitness & (Western Boulevard - ring Wellbeing centre is 500 yards Nuffield Health road) signposted towards on the left. Fitness & Wellbeing Centre Mansfield. Plains Road From the A1 North Mapperley Follow this road for 2.5 miles Nottingham and turn left on to A60 Leave at the Clumber NG3 5RH signposted Mansfield - ensure roundabout, following the that you are in the right hand A614 through Ollerton to the Telephone: 01158 220 306 side lane when turning left at roundabout with the A60. www.nuffieldhealth.com this junction. Then follow the A60 through Parking, including disabled After 100 yards, turn right Arnold and Daybrook past the parking, is available at the at traffic lights on to A6211 Home Breweries. Thackeray’s Lane. facility. Turn left after Vale Public Directions by car *At island, take the third exit House traffic lights on to to continue on A6211 (now A6211 Thackeray’s Lane. From the M1 junction 26 becoming Arno Vale Road). See the previous directions * At the roundabout take Follow this road for approx the A610 signposted to 1 mile until you reach the From the A1 South Nottingham. Follow the A610 crossroads with Plains road. Leave at Grantham following (over 2 roundabouts) towards Turn right at this junction. the A52 to Bingham. Nottingham. Turn right on the A5097 through Lowdham to Oxton, To Mansfield A60 turning left on the B6386 to join the A614 just before the A6011 roundabout with the A60. Arnold Ln A6514 B684 A60 Then follow the A60 To Newark-on-Trent southbound through Arnold A611 Plains Rd Nuffield Health and Daybrook past the Home Fitness & Wellbeing A6011 A6012 Breweries.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One: Introduction 1
    Feminism, citizenship and social activity: The role and importance of local women’s organisations, Nottingham 1918-1969 Samantha Clements, B.A., M.A. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2008 ABSTRACT This local study of single-sex organisations in Nottingham and Nottinghamshire is an attempt to redress some of the imbalanced coverage given to this area of history thus far. A chronological study, it examines the role, importance and, to some extent, impact of a wide range of women’s organisations in the local context. Some were local branches of national organisations, others were specifically concerned with local issues. The local focus allows a challenge to be made to much current thought as to the strength of a “women’s movement” in the years between the suffrage movement and the emergence of a more radical form of feminism in the 1970s. The strength of feminist issues and campaigning is studied in three periods – the inter-war period, the Second World War and its immediate aftermath, and the 1950s and 1960s. The first two periods have previously been studied on a national level but, until recently, the post-Second World war era has been written off as overwhelmingly domestic and therefore unconstructive to the achievement of any feminist aims. This study suggests that, at a local level, this is not the case and that other conclusions reached about twentieth century feminism at a national level are not always applicable to the local context. The study also goes further than attempting to track interest in equality feminism in the mid years of the century by discussing the importance of citizenship campaigns and the social dimension of membership of women’s organisations.
    [Show full text]