DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatial Ecology of and Public Attitudes Toward Monk Parakeets Nesting on Electric Utility Structures in Dallas and Tarrant Counties, Texas, US

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatial Ecology of and Public Attitudes Toward Monk Parakeets Nesting on Electric Utility Structures in Dallas and Tarrant Counties, Texas, US SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF AND PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD MONK PARAKEETS NESTING ON ELECTRIC UTILITY STRUCTURES IN DALLAS AND TARRANT COUNTIES, TEXAS A Dissertation by JANET ELAINE REED Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Robert A. McCleery Co-Chair of Committee, Nova J. Silvy Committee Members, Fred E. Smeins Donald J. Brightsmith Wm. Alex McIntosh Head of Department, Michael P. Masser August 2014 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Copyright 2014 Janet Elaine Reed ABSTRACT Monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) were introduced to the United States (US) where they established naturalized populations. They often build their bulky twig nests on electric utility structures, causing economic damage. From May 2010–February 2013, we examined the spatial ecology of and public attitudes toward monk parakeets nesting on electric utility structures in Dallas and Tarrant counties, Texas, US. As nest sites, monk parakeets selected electric switchyards and substations constructed with multiple flat surfaces and acute-angles, within small fenced areas, with large canopy trees and taller anthropogenic structures within 100 m. Multi-scale analysis of urban land use-land cover (LULC) suggested the surrounding landscape had little impact on nest-site selection. Monk parakeets used canopy LULC more often than pavement, grass, buildings, or water. They traveled farthest from their nests during winter. Flock sizes were highly variable, yet largest during nonbreeding season. They foraged on a broad range of native vegetation and exhibited a diverse diet of flowers, fruits, acorns, grass blades, wild dry seeds, leaf buds, insect larvae, and commercial bird seed. We evaluated sociological variables as predictors of opposition to managing monk parakeets nesting on electric utility structures. Most survey participants were affluent, well-educated, older Caucasians who were unknowledgeable about, inexperienced with, and unsure about the impacts of monk parakeets. They indicated least opposition to nest removal and structural modification. When opposing, they ii would most likely do so socially and through petitions. Participants were influenced by their desire for monk parakeets to feed at their bird feeders or nest in their yard, people and groups important to them, and their perceived ease of opposing. Our results suggest LULC manipulation and food-based strategies are not reasonable for controlling urban monk parakeets. We recommend an outreach program explaining monk parakeet biology and the impacts of their nesting habits. We suggest targeting affluent areas adjacent to electric structures with nests and the predictors driving participants’ behaviors. To provoke least opposition, we advise nest removal and structural modification. We recommend electric companies conduct cost-benefit analyses exploring feasibility of modifying construction elements preferred by monk parakeets and redesigning new construction to reduce risk of future nesting on electric utility structures. iii DEDICATION Anyone can be a father, but it takes someone special to be a dad, and that’s why I call you dad, because you are so special to me. —Wade A. Boggs, American baseball player With much love and respect, I dedicate this work to Roger C. Stone (1935– 2013), the man whom I considered my Dad. When I was a young adult, Roger stepped in and filled the empty shoes of a strong male figure in my life. He was one of my greatest champions of my quest for knowledge. I am forever grateful for his unwavering support and encouragement for whatever I pursued. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my committee chair, Dr. Robert A. McCleery, co-chair, Dr. Nova J. Silvy, and committee members, Dr. Fred E. Smeins, Dr. Donald J. Brightsmith, and Dr. Wm. Alex McIntosh, for their guidance and support throughout the course of this project. I also thank the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences faculty and staff for making my time at Texas A&M University a first-class experience. I extend my gratitude to Luminant Environmental Research Program and Oncor Electric Delivery (hereinafter called Oncor) for funding this research. It was an honor to be a Luminant Environmental Research Program fellow. I appreciate the direction of Oncor Vice Presidents of Environment, Health, Safety, and Training, Deborah A. Boyle (former) and Ray Averitt (current). I also thank Oncor personnel for their logistical assistance at electric utility stations. I extend a special thank you to Dr. J. Jill Heatley for her veterinarian expertise and advice for handling wild monk parakeets. I thank volunteer field assistants Amelia Hudson, Laura Siffring, and Lorna Hanko for their hard work and dedication assisting with electric station surveys and trapping and marking monk parakeets. I thank the residents, businesses, and bird club members of Tarrant and Dallas counties for sharing information about monk parakeets and their nest locations. I also thank the volunteer reviewers and residents and businesses who graciously participated in the public attitudes survey. I extend a special thank you to Justin Chown for facilitating a portion of the statistical analyses. v I thank my friends and colleagues for their support and encouragement throughout the doctoral process. A special thank you goes to Alan B. Alley, my greatest advocate, for encouraging me when I doubted myself. Finally, I thank my charismatic pet monk parakeets, Monkey and Pistol, for entertaining me while I analyzed data and wrote this dissertation. Their mischievous antics brought much laughter to the experience. Dissertation chapters have several coauthors, which were determined using guidelines provided by Dickson and Conner (1978) and the CBE Style Manual Committee (1994). Authorships for chapters are as follows: Chapter II: Janet E. Reed, Robert A. McCleery, Nova J. Silvy, Fred E. Smeins, and Donald J. Brightsmith Chapter III: Janet E. Reed, Robert A. McCleery, Nova J. Silvy, Fred E. Smeins, and Donald J. Brightsmith Chapter IV: Janet E. Reed, Robert A. McCleery, Nova J. Silvy, Fred E. Smeins, and Donald J. Brightsmith Chapter V: Janet E. Reed, Wm. Alex McIntosh, Robert A. McCleery, Nova J. Silvy, Fred E. Smeins, and Donald J. Brightsmith vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................ii DEDICATION .................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xi LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER II UNDERSTANDING HABITAT USE AND BEHAVIORS OF NON- NATIVE MONK PARAKEETS IN DALLAS, TEXAS ................................................... 4 Synopsis ......................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5 Study Area ...................................................................................................................... 8 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 11 Trapping ................................................................................................................... 11 Telemetry .................................................................................................................. 13 Diurnal Activity Patterns .......................................................................................... 14 Urban LULC Selection ............................................................................................. 15 Movements ............................................................................................................... 16 Data Analyses ........................................................................................................... 17 Results .......................................................................................................................... 18 Diurnal Activity Patterns .......................................................................................... 21 Flock-size Variation and Flock Composition ........................................................... 24 Urban LULC Selection ............................................................................................. 27 Movements ............................................................................................................... 29 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 33 Diurnal Activity Patterns .......................................................................................... 33 Flock-size Variation and Flock Composition ..........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduced Population of Ring-Necked Parakeets Psittacula Krameri in Madeira Island, Portugal – Call for Early Action
    Management of Biological Invasions (2020) Volume 11, Issue 3: 576–587 CORRECTED PROOF Research Article Introduced population of ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri in Madeira Island, Portugal – Call for early action Ricardo Rocha1,2, Luís Reino1,2, Pedro Sepúlveda3 and Joana Ribeiro1,2,* 1Laboratório Associado, CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal 2Laboratório Associado, CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal 3DROTA - Direção Regional do Ordenamento do Território e Ambiente, Rua Dr. Pestana Júnior, 9064-506 Funchal, Portugal Author e-mails: [email protected] (RR), [email protected] (LR), [email protected] (PS), [email protected], [email protected] (JR) *Corresponding author Citation: Rocha R, Reino L, Sepúlveda P, Ribeiro J (2020) Introduced population of Abstract ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri in Madeira Island, Portugal – Call for early Alien invasive species are major drivers of ecological change worldwide, being action. Management of Biological especially detrimental in oceanic islands, where they constitute one of the greatest Invasions 11(3): 576–587, https://doi.org/10. threats to the survival of native species. Ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri 3391/mbi.2020.11.3.15 (Scopoli, 1769) are popular pets and individuals escaped from captivity have formed Received: 29 October 2019 multiple self-sustainable populations outside their native range. For over ten years, Accepted: 5 March 2020 free-ranging ring-necked parakeets have regularly been observed in Madeira Island Published: 28 May 2020 (Portugal) and strong evidence suggests that they have breed multiple times in Funchal, the capital of the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrelenting Spread of the Alien Monk Parakeet Myiopsitta Monachus In
    Research Article Received: 21 December 2015 Revised: 28 June 2016 Accepted article published: 1 July 2016 Published online in Wiley Online Library: 12 August 2016 (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI 10.1002/ps.4349 Unrelenting spread of the alien monk parakeet Myiopsitta monachus in Israel. Is it time to sound the alarm? Jose-Luis Postigo,a* Assaf Shwartz,b Diederik Strubbec,d and Antonio-Román Muñoza,e Abstract BACKGROUND: Monk parakeets, Myiopsitta monachus Boddaert, are native to South America but have established populations in North America, Europe, Africa and Asia. They are claimed to act as agricultural pests in their native range, and their communal stick nests may damage human infrastructure. Although several monk parakeet populations are present in the Mediterranean Basin and temperate Europe, little empirical data are available on their population size and growth, distribution and potential impact. We investigated the temporal and spatial dynamics of monk parakeets in Israel to assess their invasion success and potential impact on agriculture. RESULTS: Monk parakeet populations are growing exponentially at a higher rate than that reported elsewhere. The current Israeli population of monk parakeets comprises approximately 1500 individuals. The distribution of the species has increased and shifted from predominantly urban areas to agricultural landscapes. CONCLUSIONS: In Israel, monk parakeet populations are growing fast and have dispersed rapidly from cities to agricultural areas. At present, reports of agricultural damage are scarce. A complete assessment of possible management strategies is urgently needed before the population becomes too large and widespread to allow for cost-effective mitigation campaigns to be implemented. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry Supporting information may be found in the online version of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • TAG Operational Structure
    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Species
    NAME OF SPECIES: Myiopsitta monachus Synonyms: Psittacus monachus Common Name: Monk parrot, monk parakeet, Quaker parakeet, grey-breasted parakeet, grey- headed parakeet. A. CURRENT STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION I. In Wisconsin? 1. YES NO X 2. Abundance: 3. Geographic Range: Found just south of Wisconsin in greater Chicago, Illinois (2). 4. Habitat Invaded: Disturbed Areas Undisturbed Areas 5. Historical Status and Rate of Spread in Wisconsin: 6. Proportion of potential range occupied: 7. Survival and Reproduction: This species can survive and flourish in cold climates (2). II. Invasive in Similar Climate 1. YES X NO Zones Where (include trends): This species is found in some States scattered throughout the U.S.-the closet State to Wisconsin is Illinois (2). This species is increasing expontentially (2). III. Invasive in Similar Habitat 1. Upland Wetland Dune Prairie Aquatic Types Forest Grassland Bog Fen Swamp Marsh Lake Stream Other: This species is mainly found in urban and suburban areas (2, 5). IV. Habitat Affected 1. Where does this invasive resided: Edge species X Interior species 2. Conservation significance of threatened habitats: None V. Native Habitat 1. List countries and native habitat types: South America. They are found in open areas, oak savannas, scrub forests, and palm groves (4, 12). VI. Legal Classification 1. Listed by government entities? This species is listed as a non- game, unprotected species. 2. Illegal to sell? YES NO X Notes: In about 12 states monk parrots are illegal to own or sell because they are seen as agriculture pests (1). Where this species can be sold, they are sold for $50-160/bird (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Parrots in the London Area a London Bird Atlas Supplement
    Parrots in the London Area A London Bird Atlas Supplement Richard Arnold, Ian Woodward, Neil Smith 2 3 Abstract species have been recorded (EASIN http://alien.jrc. Senegal Parrot and Blue-fronted Amazon remain between 2006 and 2015 (LBR). There are several ec.europa.eu/SpeciesMapper ). The populations of more or less readily available to buy from breeders, potential factors which may combine to explain the Parrots are widely introduced outside their native these birds are very often associated with towns while the smaller species can easily be bought in a lack of correlation. These may include (i) varying range, with non-native populations of several and cities (Lever, 2005; Butler, 2005). In Britain, pet shop. inclination or ability (identification skills) to report species occurring in Europe, including the UK. As there is just one parrot species, the Ring-necked (or Although deliberate release and further import of particular species by both communities; (ii) varying well as the well-established population of Ring- Rose-ringed) parakeet Psittacula krameri, which wild birds are both illegal, the captive populations lengths of time that different species survive after necked Parakeet (Psittacula krameri), five or six is listed by the British Ornithologists’ Union (BOU) remain a potential source for feral populations. escaping/being released; (iii) the ease of re-capture; other species have bred in Britain and one of these, as a self-sustaining introduced species (Category Escapes or releases of several species are clearly a (iv) the low likelihood that deliberate releases will the Monk Parakeet, (Myiopsitta monachus) can form C). The other five or six¹ species which have bred regular event.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Assessment
    PEST RISK ASSESSMENT Quaker parrot Myiopsitta monachus Photo: Flickr 2008. Image from Wikimedia Commons licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. May 2011 This publication should be cited as: Latitude 42 (2011) Pest Risk Assessment: Quaker parrot (Myiopsitta monachus). Latitude 42 Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd. Hobart, Tasmania. About this Pest Risk Assessment This pest risk assessment is developed in accordance with the Policy and Procedures for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Vertebrate Wildlife in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2011). The policy and procedures set out conditions and restrictions for the importation of controlled animals pursuant to s32 of the Nature Conservation Act 2002. For more information about this Pest Risk Assessment, please contact: Wildlife Management Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Address: GPO Box 44, Hobart, TAS. 7001, Australia. Phone: 1300 386 550 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Disclaimer The information provided in this Pest Risk Assessment is provided in good faith. The Crown, its officers, employees and agents do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information in this Pest Risk Assessment and/or reliance on its availability at any time. Pest Risk Assessment: Quaker Parrot Myiopsitta monachus 2/18 1. Summary The Quaker parrot, Myiopsitta monachus, is a medium-sized bird, mostly green and grey with a blue- grey forehead. It is unique among psittaciformes in that it builds a stick nest rather than breeding in a cavity. These stick nests are often communal, with multiple pairs breeding in the same large stick structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Protection Rhetoric and Nonnative Species
    Society & Animals 21 (2013) 54-73 brill.com/soan “Support Your Local Invasive Species”: Animal Protection Rhetoric and Nonnative Species Mona Seymour Loyola Marymount University [email protected] Abstract This article explores protection efforts that have arisen in the New York City metropolitan area around the monk parakeet, a nonnative bird that has achieved a broad distribution outside its native habitat range. In some urban regions in which populations are established, controversy has developed around the parakeets’ use of utility infrastructure and potential impacts on native species and agricultural crops. This case provides an opportunity to explore animal protection rhetoric about nonnative species, an understudied topic, considering the great extent to which species have become established in ecosystems outside their natural ranges and the persistence of public affinity for nonnative plants and wildlife. This article identifies four major frames through which advocates have delivered the birds to public and legal audiences and considers how they have mobilized and handled notions of “nonnative-ness” in their advocacy work. Keywords advocacy, claims-making, exotic species, monk parakeet, wildlife management Introduction Native to the lowlands of South America, monk or Quaker parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) have established breeding populations around the globe (Butler, 2005). The international trade in exotic pet birds is implicated in their dispersal, with purposeful and accidental releases of individuals constituting the bases of colonies (Russello, Avery, & Wright, 2008; South & Pruett-Jones, 2000; Lever, 1987). Approximately 64,000 monk parakeets were imported to the United States between 1968 and 1972, and by 1973 there were an esti- mated 4,000 to 5,000 free-flying monk parakeets in the country (Neidermyer & Hickey, 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Nestsite Selection by Slenderbilled Parakeets in a Chilean
    Journal of Field Ornithology J. Field Ornithol. 84(1):13–22, 2013 DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12001 Nest-site selection by Slender-billed Parakeets in a Chilean agricultural-forest mosaic Ana Paula B. Carneiro,1 Jaime E. Jimenez,´ 2 Pablo M. Vergara,3 and Thomas H. White, Jr.4,5 1Laboratorio de Vida Silvestre, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile 2Sub-Antarctic Biocultural Conservation Program, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76207, USA, and Omora Etnobotanical Park, Universidad de Magallanes, Puerto Williams, Chile 3Departamento de Gestion´ Agraria, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile 4U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Puerto Rican Parrot Recovery Program, Box 1600, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico 00745, USA Received 26 December 2011; accepted 9 November 2012 ABSTRACT. Species in the family Psittacidae may be particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic habitat transformations that reduce availability of suitable breeding sites at different spatial scales. In southern Chile, loss of native forest cover due to agricultural conversion may impact populations of Slender-billed Parakeets (Enicognathus leptorhynchus), endemic secondary cavity-nesting psittacids. Our objective was to assess nest-site selection by Slender-billed Parakeets in an agricultural-forest mosaic of southern Chile at two spatial scales: nest trees and the habitat surrounding those trees. During the 2008–2009 breeding seasons, we identified nest sites (N = 31) by observing parakeet behavior and using information provided by local residents. Most (29/31) nests were in mature Nothofagus obliqua trees. By comparing trees used for nesting with randomly selected, unused trees, we found that the probability of a tree being selected as a nest site was positively related to the number of cavity entrances, less dead crown, and more basal injuries (e.g., fire scars).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Monk Parakeets As Nest-Site Facilitators in Their Native and Invaded Areas
    biology Article The Role of Monk Parakeets as Nest-Site Facilitators in Their Native and Invaded Areas Dailos Hernández-Brito 1,* , Martina Carrete 2 , Guillermo Blanco 3, Pedro Romero-Vidal 2 , Juan Carlos Senar 4 , Emiliano Mori 5 , Thomas H. White, Jr. 6, Álvaro Luna 1,7 and José L. Tella 1 1 Department of Conservation Biology, Doñana Biological Station (CSIC), Calle Américo Vespucio 26, 41092 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] (Á.L.); [email protected] (J.L.T.) 2 Department of Physical, Chemical and Natural Systems, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Carretera de Utrera, km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (P.R.-V.) 3 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 4 Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, Castell dels Tres Dragons, Parc Ciutadella, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 5 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri, Via Madonna del Piano 10, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019 Florence, Italy; [email protected] 6 Puerto Rican Parrot Recovery Program, US Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1600, Rio Grande, PR 00745, USA; [email protected] 7 Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Invasive species can be harmful to native species, although this fact could be more complex when some natives eventually benefit from invaders. Faced with this paradox, we show Citation: Hernández-Brito, D.; how the invasive monk parakeet, the only parrot species that builds its nests with sticks, can host Carrete, M.; Blanco, G.; Romero-Vidal, other species as tenants, increasing nest-site availability for native but also exotic species.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Chewing Lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) From
    Zootaxa 2117: 37–42 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) from parrots and parakeets of the genera Cyanoliseus and Enicognathus in Chile and Argentina, with descriptions of a new species ARMANDO CICCHINO1 & DANIEL GONZÁLEZ-ACUÑA2,3 1Laboratorio de Artrópodos, Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3300,7600 Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Research Career of the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONlCET) 2Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 537, Chillán, Chile. E-mail: [email protected] 23Corresponding author Abstract The following three species of parrots: Enicognathus leptorhynchus (King) (Choroy = Slender-billed Parakeet), E. ferrugineus (-Müller) (Cachaña = Austral Parakeet) and Cyanoliseus patagonus (Vieillot) (Tricahue or Barranquero Parrot = Burrowing Parrot) from Southern Chile and Argentina were examined for chewing lice. Four louse species were found: Psittacobrossus patagoni Price and Beer and Heteromenopon macrurum (Eichler) ex the Austral Parakeet, Paragoniocotes meridionalis Guimarães, H. macrurum and P. patagoni ex the Burrowing Parrot, and H. macrurum and a new species of Paragoniocotes Cummings ex the Slender-billed Parakeet and the Austral Parakeet. P. meriodionalis is a new record for Chilean fauna, and E. leptorhynchus is a new host for H. macrurum. Paragoniocotes enicognathidis n. sp. is described and illustrated, discussing the morphological affinities with its close relatives. Key words: Insecta, new species, taxonomy, South America, louse Introduction There are not records of chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) on birds of the Psittacidae (Aves: Psittiformes) in Chile. In Argentina, Mey et al.
    [Show full text]
  • WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING in BRAZIL Sandra Charity and Juliana Machado Ferreira
    July 2020 WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN BRAZIL Sandra Charity and Juliana Machado Ferreira TRAFFIC: Wildlife Trade in Brazil WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN BRAZIL TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, is a leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. © Jaime Rojo / WWF-US Reproduction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TRAFFIC David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1223 277427 Email: [email protected] Suggested citation: Charity, S., Ferreira, J.M. (2020). Wildlife Trafficking in Brazil. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. © WWF-Brazil / Zig Koch © TRAFFIC 2020. Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. ISBN: 978-1-911646-23-5 UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Design by: Hallie Sacks Cover photo: © Staffan Widstrand / WWF This report was made possible with support from the American people delivered through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
    [Show full text]
  • Are Quaker Parrots Legal in My State?
    ARE QUAKER PARROTS LEGAL IN MY STATE? All of the following information is from the Quaker Parakeet Society website. QPS HOME | THE SENTINEL | QPSRAPP | ERC | FUNDRAISING | WILD QUAKERS | QPLIST ADMINISTRATION Legal, Ilegal & Restricted States Listing • • Alabama -Legal with no restrictions • Alaska - Legal with no restrictions • Arizona -Legal with no restrictions • Arkansas -Legal with no restrictions • California - Illegal to own or sell; no exceptions • Colorado -Colorado Wildlife ARTICLE VIII regarding POSSESSION,Prohibited Species, reads: >>The following terrestrial wildlife species or viable gametes (eggs and sperm) are hereby determined to be detrimental to existing wildlife and their habitat in Colorado, and except as authorized in writing by the Division of Wildlife in accordance with criteria in Commission Regulation #1102A.4. and consideration of the potential for and adverse impacts of hybridization with native wildlife, their possession is prohibited. Persons who have proof of possession of those species listed in subsections 1 through 8 of this section prior to September 1, 1990, may possess the following species for the life of the animal(s). These live animals may not be transported, imported, sold, bartered or traded within Colorado. They may be transported out of state according to state and federal regulations. All animals held under the grandfather clause must be tagged, recorded, and reported as per regulations #1106, #1109, and #1110 in Chapter 11. 1. All species and hybrids of wild species in the subfamily Caprinae not native to North America. 03/14/02 12. Monk parakeet - (Myiopsitta monachus) • • Connecticut - It appears that this state has made it illegal to own, breed, sell, transport Quaker Parrots in the state and that efforts are being made to remove Quaker Parakeets from their dangerous species listing.
    [Show full text]