DOCSLIB.ORG

Minnehaha Creek Watershed Lakes TMDL (Wq-Iw11-09E)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minnehaha Creek Watershed Lakes TMDL (Wq-Iw11-09E) Prepared by: Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. For the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District MCWD Lakes TMDL – Lake Nokomis, Parley Lake, Lake Virginia, Wassermann Lake February 2011 water ecology community Cover Images Left Image: Yellow and white water lily bed on Lake Virginia Right Image: Yellow water lily MCWD Lakes TMDL – February 2011 Minnehaha Creek Watershed Lakes TMDL: Lake Nokomis, Parley Lake, Lake Virginia, and Wassermann Lake February 2011 Primary Authors and Contributors Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chris Zadak Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Nat Kale Mike Wyatt Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. Andrea Plevan Jennifer Olson wq-iw11-09e MCWD Lakes TMDL – February 2011 TMDL Summary Table EPA/MPCA Required TMDL Summary Elements Page # Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in the Upper Location Mississippi Basin, Hennepin County and Carver County, MN 4 (HUC 07010206). Describe the water body as it is identified on the State/Tribe’s 303(d) list: • Nokomis 27-0019, Parley 10-0042, Virginia 10-0015, 303(d) Listing Wassermann 10-0048 Information 4 • Impaired Beneficial Use(s) - Aquatic recreation • Indicator: Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators • Target start/completion date: 2003/2008 • Original listing year: 2002, 2004 Class 2B waters, MN Eutrophication Standards, MN Rule 7050.0222 Subp. 4 Eutro- Eutro- Proposed phication phication Site- Parameter Standard, Standard, Specific General Shallow Std Applicable Water TP (µg/l) TP < 40 TP < 60 TP < 50 Quality Standards/ 34 Chlorophyll- Numeric Targets chl < 14 chl < 20 chl < 20 a (µg/l) Secchi SD > 1.4 SD > 1.0 SD > 1.4 depth (m) Lakes the Nokomis, standards Virginia, Parley Nokomis apply to Wassermann Nokomis: 1.34 lbs TP/day (for requested site-specific standard: 2.03 lbs TP/day) 57, 70, 82, Parley: 3.5 lbs TP/day 91 Loading Capacity Virginia: 0.84 lbs TP/day (expressed as daily Wassermann: 0.78 lbs TP/day load) Critical condition: in summer when TP concentrations Critical peak and clarity is typically at its worst condition: 93 Wasteload Allocation Source Permit # TMDL Lakes Parley, Carver County MS400070 70, 91 Wassermann Chanhassen City MS400079 Virginia 82 Hennepin County MS400138 Nokomis 57 Parley, Laketown Township MS400142 70, 91 Wassermann Metropolitan Airports MN0002101 Nokomis 57 Commission Minneapolis City MN0061018 Nokomis 57 Minnehaha Creek MS400182 Parley 70 Watershed District Minnetrista City MS400106 Parley, 70 Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. i MCWD Lakes TMDL – February 2011 Nokomis, Parley, Mn/DOT Metro District MS400170 57, 70, 82 Virginia Richfield City MS400045 Nokomis 57 Shorewood City MS400122 Virginia 82 Parley, Virginia, Victoria City MS400126 70, 82, 91 Wassermann Waconia City MS400232 Parley 70 Construction and 57, 70, 82, Various all industrial stormwater 91 Reserve Capacity (and related discussion in NA 44 report) Source LA Non-regulated stormwater various Load Allocation 57, 70, 82, Internal load various 91 Atmospheric deposition various Margin of Safety Implicit MOS: Conservative modeling assumptions 40 Seasonal variation: Critical conditions in these lakes occur in the summer, when TP concentrations peak and clarity is at its worst. The water quality standards are based on Seasonal Variation growing season averages. The load reductions are designed 93 so that the lakes will meet the water quality standards over the course of the growing season (June through September). Summarize Reasonable Assurance MCWD Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan Reasonable Assurance 94 NPDES Phase I and Phase II MS4 permits and SWPPPs Local surface water management plans Monitoring Monitoring Plan included? yes 102 1. Implementation Strategy included? yes Implementation 97 2. Cost estimate included? yes • Public Comment period (dates) • Comments received? Public Participation 95 • Summary of other key elements of public participation process Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. ii MCWD Lakes TMDL – February 2011 Table of Contents Executive Summary....................................................................................................................1 1. Background .........................................................................................................................4 A. 303(d) Listings......................................................................................................................................4 B. Lake and Watershed Descriptions .......................................................................................................4 Lower Minnehaha Creek Watershed: Lake Nokomis...........................................................................6 Six Mile Creek Lakes: Parley and Wassermann ................................................................................11 Lake Virginia.......................................................................................................................................18 C. Pollutant Sources...............................................................................................................................24 Role of Phosphorus in Lakes .............................................................................................................24 Phosphorus and Shallow Lake Ecology.............................................................................................25 Phosphorus Sources ..........................................................................................................................27 2. Water Quality Standards ..................................................................................................34 Designated Uses ....................................................................................................................................34 Water Quality Standards.........................................................................................................................34 TMDL Endpoints .....................................................................................................................................34 3. TMDL Derivation Approach..............................................................................................36 A. Pollutant Sources ...............................................................................................................................36 B. Calculation of TMDL Components .....................................................................................................39 Loading Capacity................................................................................................................................39 Margin of Safety .................................................................................................................................40 Wasteload Allocations ........................................................................................................................41 Load Allocations .................................................................................................................................44 Trading or Transfer of Allocations ......................................................................................................44 Reserve Capacity ...............................................................................................................................44 4. Lake Assessments and TMDL Calculations ...................................................................46 A. Lake Nokomis.....................................................................................................................................46 Water Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................48 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................51 TMDL Determination ..........................................................................................................................52 B. Parley Lake ........................................................................................................................................59 Water Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................60 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................64 TMDL Determination ..........................................................................................................................64 C. Lake Virginia ......................................................................................................................................73 Water Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................73 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................77 TMDL Determination ..........................................................................................................................78 D. Wassermann Lake .............................................................................................................................83 Water Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................83 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................86
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Resources Report
    MMINNEAPOLISINNEAPOLIS PPARKARK && RRECREATIONECREATION BBOARDOARD 20122012 WWATERATER RRESOURCESESOURCES RREPORTEPORT Environmental Stewardship Water Resources Management www.minneapolisparks.org January 2015 2012 WATER RESOURCES REPORT Prepared by: Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Environmental Stewardship 3800 Bryant Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55409-1029 612.230.6400 www.minneapolisparks.org January 2015 Funding provided by: Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board City of Minneapolis Public Works Copyright © 2015 by the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Material may be quoted with attribution. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... iv 1. Monitoring Program Overview .............................................................................................. 1-1 2. Birch Pond .............................................................................................................................. 2-1 3. Brownie Lake ......................................................................................................................... 3-1 4. Lake Calhoun ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 5. Cedar Lake ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minneapolis Public Works Department Minneapolis Park & Recreation
    NPDES MS4 Phase I Permit No. MN0061018 Annual Report for 2014 Activities City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Co-Permittees Prepared by: Minneapolis Public Works Department in conjunction with Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board July 31, 2015 NPDES MS4 PHASE I PERMIT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2014 ACTIVITIES Acknowledgements Public Works-Surface Water & Sewers Paul Chellsen Lane Christianson Kevin Danen Lois Eberhart Paul Hudalla Kelly Moriarity Matt Stonich Jeremy Strehlo John Studtmann Dick Thornbloom Karl Westermeyer Public Works - Transportation Maintenance & Repair Steve Collin Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Rachael Crabb Michael Perniel Debra Pilger MaryLynn Pulscher Health Department - Environmental Services Tom Frame Patrick Hanlon Regulatory Services Steve Kennedy Source: Minneapolis Public Works – Surface Water and Sewers ii Table of Contents Cover Page ...................................................................................................................................................... Signature Page ............................................................................................................................................... Certification and Resolution 2015R-303…………………………………………………………………... Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Cloud Man a Dakota Leader Faces His Changing World
    RAMSEY COUNTY All Under $11,000— The Growing Pains of Two ‘Queen Amies’ A Publication o f the Ramsey County Historical Society Page 25 Spring, 2001 Volume 36, Number 1 The Life and Times of Cloud Man A Dakota Leader Faces His Changing World George Catlin’s painting, titled “Sioux Village, Lake Calhoun, near Fort Snelling.” This is Cloud Man’s village in what is now south Minneapolis as it looked to the artist when he visited Lake Calhoun in the summer of 1836. Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison, Jr. See article beginning on page 4. RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORY Executive Director Priscilla Farnham Editor Virginia Brainard Kunz RAMSEY COUNTY Volume 36, Number 1 Spring, 2001 HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Howard M. Guthmann CONTENTS Chair James Russell 3 Letters President Marlene Marschall 4 A ‘Good Man’ in a Changing World First Vice President Cloud Man, the Dakota Leader, and His Life and Times Ronald J. Zweber Second Vice President Mark Dietrich Richard A. Wilhoit Secretary 25 Growing Up in St. Paul Peter K. Butler All for Under $11,000: ‘Add-ons,’ ‘Deductions’ Treasurer The Growing Pains of Two ‘Queen Annes’ W. Andrew Boss, Peter K. Butler, Norbert Conze- Bob Garland mius, Anne Cowie, Charlotte H. Drake, Joanne A. Englund, Robert F. Garland, John M. Harens, Rod Hill, Judith Frost Lewis, John M. Lindley, George A. Mairs, Marlene Marschall, Richard T. Publication of Ramsey County History is supported in part by a gift from Murphy, Sr., Richard Nicholson, Linda Owen, Clara M. Claussen and Frieda H. Claussen in memory of Henry H.
    [Show full text]
  • Six FLOURING MILLS on MINNEHAHA CREEK
    -f**^ ^^^^1 THESE RUINS of the old Godfrey water wheel have long since disappeared from the banks of Minnehaha Creek. The wheel is typ­ ical of the ones that powered the old- fashioned gristmills. 162 Minnesota History The Six FLOURING MILLS on MINNEHAHA CREEK Foster W. Dunwiddie MUCH HAS BEEN written about the flour-milhng in­ enjoy for fifty years — from 1880 to 1930. But in the dustry of Minneapolis and the history of St. Anthony pioneer days of Minnesota Territory, hauling grain to Falls. With development of the immense water power Minneapolis and St. Anthony was an arduous task, espe­ available at the falls, Minneapolis grew to become the cially during certain seasons of the year. Roads were flour-milling capital of the world, a position it was to poor and often impassable. This led quite naturally to the demand for small local flouring mills that were more readily accessible to the farmers, and a great many flour­ ^Lucde M. Kane, The Waterfad That Built a City, 99, 17,3 ing mills were erected throughout the territory.^ (St. Paul, 1966). The term "flour" is taken from the French In the nineteenth century, Minnehaha Creek, which term "fleur de farine, " which literally means "the flower, or still flows from Gray's Bay in Lake Minnetonka almost finest, of the meal." The word "flouring" or "flowering" was applied to miUs in this country as early as 1797. The suffix, directly eastward to the Mississippi River, was a stream "ing," was added to form a verbal noun, used in this case as an having sufficient flow of water to develop the necessary adjective to describe the type of mill.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did Edina Become Edina?
    Edina Mill: A Fast Creek Generates Did you know that Minnehaha Creek Industry…and a Community was home to several milling operations? In fact, this area’s history was defined by mills built on this once wild and rushing creek. you are here How Did Edina St. Anthony Falls Mississippi River Gov’t Mill Grays Bay Dam St. Alban’s Mill Alban’s St. MINNEAPOLIS Become Edina? Lake Minnetonka Mill Minnetonka Minnehaha Creek Globe Mill Edina Mill Richfield Mill Nine Mile Creek he Waterville Mill was built at this Purgatory Creek Fort Snelling spot in 1857 by four partners looking Mill Godfrey to make use of fast-running waters T Eden in Minnehaha Creek. Land was purchased Prairie Mill Bloomington Mill and a dam installed at a natural cascade Minnesota River � in the creek. A millrace diverted current over a waterwheel to power the grinding Edina Mill Site and Browndale Bridge are locally of wheat, oats and barley. designated as Edina Heritage Landmarks A Scots emigre named Andrew Craik bought the mill in 1869 and re-christened it “Edina Mills” after his native Edinburgh. A nearby community would flourish and in time take its name from the mill— eventually becoming the Edina of today! Hennepin History Museum The Edina Mill saw its greatest use as the primary provider of flour to the Fort Snelling Reserve during the Civil War, operating 24 hours a day to supply the Union Army. The mill passed through many owners over the years and was converted by its last owner to turbine power in 1879, employing three turbines to drive the millstones—advanced technology for the time.
    [Show full text]
  • SECRETS of the BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED
    The Bassett Creek watershed begins in Cover Photo by Dan Johnson Dan by Photo Cover WHO WE ARE western Plymouth where ponds, wetlands, and AND WHAT WE DO swales or ditches drain to Plymouth Creek, The Bassett Creek Watershed which flows southeasterly before emptying into Management Commission the western side of Medicine Lake. (BCWMC) works to protect and Bassett Creek emerges from the southern Numerous pollutants are carried in the storm- improve the condition of lakes, edge of Medicine Lake and flows south and LIGHTEN YOUR STEP BE PART OF THE SOLUTION 7. TURN THE FLOW AROUND Trumpeter Swans: Photo by Dan Johnson water runoff, including: Lawn fertilizers, nutrients Direct a downspout back into your yard away from driveways Did you know the average home uses 100,000 streams, wetlands, and ponds then east, picking up water from the Sweeney from decaying grass clippings and leaves, pesticides, Twelve easy things you can do at home! and sidewalks where it can run off your property. Make a within its borders. The BCWMC Lake Branch and the North Branch of Bassett gallons of water per year? That’s 274 gallons a day. shallow depression away from your foundation where But that’s just the start. Each of us is a consumer of 1. BE A STORM DRAIN GOALIE downspout water can accumulate and soak in the ground. is a cooperative organization among the nine Rain water gets away from us too quickly sometimes (that must Creek before entering a tunnel and traveling 2.4 Better yet, save that water in a rain barrel and use the reservoir water on a far grander scale.
    [Show full text]
  • HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN Aligning Water Management and Use
    HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN Aligning Water Management and Use AMENDMENT TO THE NOKOMIS-HIAWATHA REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN FEBRUARY 17, 2021 HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nokomis-Hiawatha Regional Park is named for the lakes it surrounds, Lake Nokomis and Lake Hiawatha. The park is a treasured gathering space in the heart of South Minneapolis and is located along the Grand Rounds National Scenic Byway and the banks of Minnehaha Creek. It provides a wide range of recreational opportunities, including a beloved 18-hole golf course on the west shore of Lake Hiawatha. The site was once the location of Rice Lake and a connected wetland complex. The lake was dredged and the wetlands filled in the 1920s, and the golf course was designed and constructed in the early 1930s over the dredge materials. The course has a classic feel with its tree-lined fairways and pushup greens. It is easily playable, but still challenging. And it is a course that is steeped in history and a tradition of welcoming all people. In June of 2014, over 11 inches of rain fell over a large area of the Minnehaha Advisory Committee (CAC) requested that the design team look at an 18-hole Creek watershed, causing a severe flood and subsequent closure of the Hiawatha option. Given the increase in the anticipated water footprint within the area and Golf Course for a significant period. The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board the directive from the Board of Commissioners to achieve a flood-resilient design, (MPRB) began a process of assessing damages and working with the Federal the engineers, landscape architects, and golf course architect determined that an Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to get the course up and running again.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Plan – Phase 1
    Natural Areas Plan – Phase 1 Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Natural Areas Plan - Phase 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgments . i Executive Summary . iii 1 Background, Project Purpose and Goals . 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................1 1.2 Project Purpose .........................................................................................1 1.3 Project Goals ...........................................................................................1 2 Data and Methods . 3 2.1 Existing Data Review ....................................................................................3 2.2 Desktop Mapping Methods ..............................................................................3 2.3 Field Methods ..........................................................................................5 3 Plant Community Classification . 7 3.1 Developing a Vegetation Classification .....................................................................7 3.2 MPRB Vegetation Classification ...........................................................................7 3.3 MPRB Vegetation Overlays ..............................................................................25 4 Ecological Ranking System . 27 4.1 Ecological Quality ......................................................................................27 4.2 Ecological Rarity in Minnesota ...........................................................................27 4.3 Ecological Rarity in MPRB Natural Areas ...................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • 2 – Creek History, Background, and Evolution
    Chapter 2 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION This chapter will provide an overview of the history of Minnehaha Creek through the following lenses: » Cultural and Historical Context, including the history of pre-contact and post-European settlement, urban development and the development of structures surrounding the Creek, and the history of racial covenants in the area » Natural Resources Impact Over Time, including an overview of pre-settlement plant communities, the evolution of relationships connecting water resources, urbanization, estabishment of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and » Infrastructure as it relates to water resources, including current flood modeling and mitigation studies CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT This section provides an overview of park area history, including cultural resources that have been identified within the bounds of Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail, located in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Additional information about cultural resources within and adjacent to Minnehaha Creek and Minnehaha Parkway can be found in Chapter 7, including applicable legislative requirements regarding cultural resource preservation and an overview of previous cultural resources investigations in the vicinity. The cultural resources of the area and the stories they evoke informed the interpretive theme and subthemes (see Chapter 6: Interpretive Plan) as a way of Eastman Painting of a Dakota settlement (Source: Minneapolis Institute of Arts) engaging visitors and enhancing their experience along the Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail. OVERVIEW OF AREA HISTORY The lakes, rivers, and topography of Minneapolis are a result of the movement of glaciers during a series of ice ages thousands of years ago. The Mississippi River once flowed through present-day South Minneapolis.
    [Show full text]
  • HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN Aligning Water Management and Use
    HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN Aligning Water Management and Use AMENDMENT TO THE NOKOMIS-HIAWATHA REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN FEBRUARY 17, 2021 HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The MPRB would like to thank the following people and organizations for their dedicated participation in the master planning process, along with the general public who is passionate about this piece of land in the heart of South Minneapolis. This plan is a reflection of the input received from the Community Advisory Committee (CAC), the general public, collaborating agencies and other project stakeholders, and MPRB staff. Dakota Land Organizations involved with the Master Plan Amendment MPRB Project Staff Consultants The MPRB acknowledges the land subject to this master plan Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board amendment is Bdote, lands once richly inhabited by the Dakota and City of Minneapolis Michael Schroeder, PLA other Indigenous peoples. Under the hands of the MPRB, that land Assistant Superintendent of Planning Services changed dramatically and in ways that fail to resonate with the spirit Minnehaha Creek Watershed District of the Dakota and the honor they bring to the land. In crafting a Neighborhood Organizations Tyrize Cox master plan to guide the future of this land, we bring good intentions Assistant Superintendent of Recreation Bancroft Neighborhood Association of healing what we have so dramatically disturbed, and with good hearts hope to restore the vital functions of the land and the water Field Regina Northrup Neighborhood Group Tyler Pederson, PLA that passes through it. We are striving for a more holistic balance Hale Page Diamond Lake Community Association Design Project Manager than has existed here for the past century, one that can better sustain Nokomis East Neighborhood Association Standish-Ericsson Neighborhood Association Joe Green all peoples for the next centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Minneapolis and St. Paul District
    DESCRIPTION OF THE MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. PAUL DISTRICT. By Frederick W. Sardeson. INTRODUCTION. district described in this folio lies in the northwestern part and southern Wisconsin, in Illinois, and in Iowa, but not of the Upper Mississippi basin subprovince and embraces the in Minnesota. They are chiefly dolomitic limestones, which LOCATION AND RELATIONS OF THE DISTRICT. junction of the Mississippi and Minnesota valleys. (See fig. 2.) include many coral reefs. They were laid down in clear, shal­ The district here described is bounded by parallels 44° 45' low seas while this region was a low coastal plain between the and 45° 15' and by meridians 93° and 93° 30' and comprises OUTLINE OF THE GEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY OF THE UPPEE Laurentian highlands on the north and the sea on the south. the Anoka, White Bear, Minneapolis, and St. Paul quad­ MISSISSIPPI BASIN SUBPROVINCE. The Devonian system covers the Silurian and overlaps it on rangles, an area of 846 square miles. It is in southeastern Extent and general relations. The Upper Mississippi basin the north so that it rests on the Ordovician in southern Minnesota (see fig. 1) and includes nearly the whole of subprovince lies west of Lake Michigan, east of the Coteau Minnesota (see fig. 3), but elsewhere it has been more strongly Ramsey County, the greater part of Hennepin County, and des Prairies, north of the Carboniferous basin or coal fields of eroded away and is less extensive than the Silurian system. smaller parts of Anoka, Dakota, Scott, and Washington coun­ Illinois and Iowa, and south of The Ranges, a southward It consists of limestones and clay shales, which were laid down ties.
    [Show full text]
  • LAKE MINNETONKA Wake When 150 Feet from Shore
    BOAT SAFETY BASICS DANGER BUOYS Identifies potential hazards in the middle of a bay © Vern Whitten Photography Credit: Chris Murphy Prints available at lmcd.org CHANNEL BUOYS Stay between red and green channel buoys. Create minimum LAKE MINNETONKA wake when 150 feet from shore. M11 POINT BUOYS Identifies potential hazards between buoy and the closest shore. M3 M8 M13 M9 BIG ISLAND CRUISER’S COVE No anchoring between designated safety lanes and minimum wake in quiet waters. M7 M10 GRID LOCATIONPUBLIC ACCESS HEAD PUMPOUTPUBLIC PUBLIC TOILETS ACCESS – FEE PICNIC AREA GASOLINE PUBLIC ACCESS PARKING 1. Deephaven, City of | 952-474-4755 H15 • • • Parking by city permit only. Vehicles with trailer. Limited 30 Lake depths (in feet) cars-only parking. Quiet water areas 2. Grays Bay Public Access & Marina | 952-939-8390 E17 • • • • • Parking – vehicles with trailer. Parking – cars only. Public and private parks 3. Halstead Drive Access | 952-446-1660 I1 • • Parking – vehicles with trailer, limited space. Bike trail (regional) 4. Headwaters Canoe Access | 952-939-8390 E18 • • • Parking – no trailer. Access to Creek only. M1 Marina (commercial) M12 5. Hendrickson Access – North Arm | 612-348-4378 E8 • • • Parking – vehicles with trailer. Parking – cars only. M4 B1 Boat access (public) 6. Lake Minnetonka Regional Park | 763-694-7754 K4 • • • • Shore shing Parking – vehicles with trailer. Parking – cars only. 7. Maxwell Bay Access – DNR | 952-496-4141 E8 • • • Public restroom Parking – vehicles with trailer. Parking – cars only. 8. Mound, City of | 952-472-0600 G4 • • • • Picnic area Parking – restrictions on weekends. On-lake restaurants 9. Spring Park Access | 612-348-4378 G7 • • • Parking – vehicles with trailer.
    [Show full text]