DOCSLIB.ORG

Minnehaha Creek Watershed Lakes Draft TMDL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minnehaha Creek Watershed Lakes Draft TMDL Prepared by: Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. For the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District MCWD Lakes TMDL – Lake Nokomis, Parley Lake, Lake Virginia, Wassermann Lake February 2011 water ecology community Cover Images Left Image: Yellow and white water lily bed on Lake Virginia Right Image: Yellow water lily MCWD Lakes TMDL – February 2011 Minnehaha Creek Watershed Lakes TMDL: Lake Nokomis, Parley Lake, Lake Virginia, and Wassermann Lake February 2011 Primary Authors and Contributors Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chris Zadak Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Nat Kale Mike Wyatt Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. Andrea Plevan Jennifer Olson wq-iw11-09e MCWD Lakes TMDL – February 2011 TMDL Summary Table EPA/MPCA Required TMDL Summary Elements Page # Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in the Upper Location Mississippi Basin, Hennepin County and Carver County, MN 4 (HUC 07010206). Describe the water body as it is identified on the State/Tribe’s 303(d) list: • Nokomis 27-0019, Parley 10-0042, Virginia 10-0015, 303(d) Listing Wassermann 10-0048 Information 4 • Impaired Beneficial Use(s) - Aquatic recreation • Indicator: Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators • Target start/completion date: 2003/2008 • Original listing year: 2002, 2004 Class 2B waters, MN Eutrophication Standards, MN Rule 7050.0222 Subp. 4 Eutro- Eutro- Proposed phication phication Site- Parameter Standard, Standard, Specific General Shallow Std Applicable Water TP (µg/l) TP < 40 TP < 60 TP < 50 Quality Standards/ 34 Chlorophyll- Numeric Targets chl < 14 chl < 20 chl < 20 a (µg/l) Secchi SD > 1.4 SD > 1.0 SD > 1.4 depth (m) Lakes the Nokomis, standards Virginia, Parley Nokomis apply to Wassermann Nokomis: 1.34 lbs TP/day (for requested site-specific standard: 2.03 lbs TP/day) 57, 70, 82, Parley: 3.5 lbs TP/day 91 Loading Capacity Virginia: 0.84 lbs TP/day (expressed as daily Wassermann: 0.78 lbs TP/day load) Critical condition: in summer when TP concentrations Critical peak and clarity is typically at its worst condition: 93 Wasteload Allocation Source Permit # TMDL Lakes Parley, Carver County MS400070 70, 91 Wassermann Chanhassen City MS400079 Virginia 82 Hennepin County MS400138 Nokomis 57 Parley, Laketown Township MS400142 70, 91 Wassermann Metropolitan Airports MN0002101 Nokomis 57 Commission Minneapolis City MN0061018 Nokomis 57 Minnehaha Creek MS400182 Parley 70 Watershed District Minnetrista City MS400106 Parley, 70 Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. i MCWD Lakes TMDL – February 2011 Nokomis, Parley, Mn/DOT Metro District MS400170 57, 70, 82 Virginia Richfield City MS400045 Nokomis 57 Shorewood City MS400122 Virginia 82 Parley, Virginia, Victoria City MS400126 70, 82, 91 Wassermann Waconia City MS400232 Parley 70 Construction and 57, 70, 82, Various all industrial stormwater 91 Reserve Capacity (and related discussion in NA 44 report) Source LA Non-regulated stormwater various Load Allocation 57, 70, 82, Internal load various 91 Atmospheric deposition various Margin of Safety Implicit MOS: Conservative modeling assumptions 40 Seasonal variation: Critical conditions in these lakes occur in the summer, when TP concentrations peak and clarity is at its worst. The water quality standards are based on Seasonal Variation growing season averages. The load reductions are designed 93 so that the lakes will meet the water quality standards over the course of the growing season (June through September). Summarize Reasonable Assurance MCWD Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan Reasonable Assurance 94 NPDES Phase I and Phase II MS4 permits and SWPPPs Local surface water management plans Monitoring Monitoring Plan included? yes 102 1. Implementation Strategy included? yes Implementation 97 2. Cost estimate included? yes • Public Comment period (dates) • Comments received? Public Participation 95 • Summary of other key elements of public participation process Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. ii MCWD Lakes TMDL – February 2011 Table of Contents Executive Summary....................................................................................................................1 1. Background .........................................................................................................................4 A. 303(d) Listings......................................................................................................................................4 B. Lake and Watershed Descriptions .......................................................................................................4 Lower Minnehaha Creek Watershed: Lake Nokomis...........................................................................6 Six Mile Creek Lakes: Parley and Wassermann ................................................................................11 Lake Virginia.......................................................................................................................................18 C. Pollutant Sources...............................................................................................................................24 Role of Phosphorus in Lakes .............................................................................................................24 Phosphorus and Shallow Lake Ecology.............................................................................................25 Phosphorus Sources ..........................................................................................................................27 2. Water Quality Standards ..................................................................................................34 Designated Uses ....................................................................................................................................34 Water Quality Standards.........................................................................................................................34 TMDL Endpoints .....................................................................................................................................34 3. TMDL Derivation Approach..............................................................................................36 A. Pollutant Sources ...............................................................................................................................36 B. Calculation of TMDL Components .....................................................................................................39 Loading Capacity................................................................................................................................39 Margin of Safety .................................................................................................................................40 Wasteload Allocations ........................................................................................................................41 Load Allocations .................................................................................................................................44 Trading or Transfer of Allocations ......................................................................................................44 Reserve Capacity ...............................................................................................................................44 4. Lake Assessments and TMDL Calculations ...................................................................46 A. Lake Nokomis.....................................................................................................................................46 Water Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................48 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................51 TMDL Determination ..........................................................................................................................52 B. Parley Lake ........................................................................................................................................59 Water Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................60 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................64 TMDL Determination ..........................................................................................................................64 C. Lake Virginia ......................................................................................................................................73 Water Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................73 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................77 TMDL Determination ..........................................................................................................................78 D. Wassermann Lake .............................................................................................................................83 Water Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................83 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................86
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Varve-Related Publications in Alphabetical Order (Version 15 March 2015) Please Report Additional References, Updates, Errors Etc
    Varve-Related Publications in Alphabetical Order (version 15 March 2015) Please report additional references, updates, errors etc. to Arndt Schimmelmann ([email protected]) Abril JM, Brunskill GJ (2014) Evidence that excess 210Pb flux varies with sediment accumulation rate and implications for dating recent sediments. Journal of Paleolimnology 52, 121-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10933-014-9782-6; statistical analysis of radiometric dating of 10 annually laminated sediment cores from aquatic systems, constant rate of supply (CRS) model. Abu-Jaber NS, Al-Bataina BA, Jawad Ali A (1997) Radiochemistry of sediments from the southern Dead Sea, Jordan. Environmental Geology 32 (4), 281-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002540050218; Dimona, Jordan, gamma spectroscopy, lead-210, no anthropogenic contamination, calculated sedimentation rate agrees with varve record. Addison JA, Finney BP, Jaeger JM, Stoner JS, Norris RN, Hangsterfer A (2012) Examining Gulf of Alaska marine paleoclimate at seasonal to decadal timescales. In: (Besonen MR, ed.) Second Workshop of the PAGES Varves Working Group, Program and Abstracts, 17-19 March 2011, Corpus Christi, Texas, USA, 15-21. http://www.pages.unibe.ch/download/docs/working_groups/vwg/2011_2nd_VWG_workshop_programs_and_abstracts.pdf; ca. 60 cm marine sediment core from Deep Inlet in southeast Alaska, CT scan, XRF scanning, suspected varves, 1972 earthquake and tsunami caused turbidite with scouring and erosion. Addison JA, Finney BP, Jaeger JM, Stoner JS, Norris RD, Hangsterfer A (2013) Integrating satellite observations and modern climate measurements with the recent sedimentary record: An example from Southeast Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118 (7), 3444-3461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20243; Gulf of Alaska, paleoproductivity, scanning XRF, Pacific Decadal Oscillation PDO, fjord, 137Cs, 210Pb, geochronometry, three-dimensional computed tomography, discontinuous event-based marine varve chronology spans AD ∼1940–1981, Br/Cl ratios reflect changes in marine organic matter accumulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Cedar Lake Park
    Cedar Lake Park and Cedar Park Steward Program Kenwood School and Kenilworth Regional Trail More than 30 years of Cedar Meadows Lake Regional Trail organized by the Cedar neighborhood corridor management Cedar Lake Park stormwater management established 1991 Lake Park Associa�on conserva�on programs Associa�on supervised and wildlife enhancement volunteer ac�vi�es Th Laurel eod ore s W a ir n n e P th Cedar Lake Park m o P 1991 CLPA, Minneapolis Audubon, h Morgan aHedberg Family Founda�on, LCMR, MPRB T r1991 Commi�ee on the Urban k Parkview Parkview Environmentw award 2010 CLPA Park Steward MPRB Adopt a a Parky Program Blue Bird Trail 1992 Minneapolis Audubon Prairie Wildflower Plan�ng Upton Mountview Russell 1995 Prairie Restora�on, Inc, CLPA, MPRB 1998 CLPA 3 9 4 1999 CLPA, Boy Scouts Wa y z a t a 2002 CLPA, Data Recogni�on Corp 2003 CLPA, Data Recogni�on Corp 2005 MPRB Spring Burn 2005 CLPA Transect Survey Vincent Brenner 2011 CLPA, Data Recogni�on Corp Brownie Lake Area Plan 2016 Prairie Restora�on Inc. s 2017 MPRB e Madeira Wayfinding Trail Access x Brownie r 1995 CLPA Cedar Lake e Antoinette X Confluence Kaltern Regional Trail w Washburn Cedar View SW LRT Design Charre�e Mount Curve 1993 CLPA, FHWA, iMnDOT,e LCMR, MPRB Cedar Lake Parkway v Confluence/Penn Sta�on Brownie e 2010 CLPA, UofM Bridge Replacement Pump k Lake a 2005 MPW, BNSF, MPRB, CLPA 2001 CLPA, MPRB L HCRRA Remnant Lands Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis, CLPA, Interpre�ve Panels Hedberg Bench MPRB, Kenwood NeighborhoodKenwood Organiza�on, 1999 CLPA 1996 CLPA, MPRB Lowry Hill Neighborhood Associa�onDoug las 2001 CLPA Trail Access, Benches Memorial Cedar Grove CLPA, MPRB, Bryn Mawr 1996-1998 CLPA Neighborhood Associa�on 2004 Bench Mound Medicine Wheel/World Mandala 2016-2018 CLPA Restora�on Cedar Lake Regional Trail n a g o L Plan, Boy Scouts, Dayton Family, North 2017 CLPA Western Extension Data Recogni�on, Inc., Prairie Cattail Restora�on, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • State Register
    State of Minnesota State Register Rules, Executive Orders, Appointments, Commissioners’ Orders, Revenue Notices, Official Notices, Grants, State Contracts & Loans, Non-State Bids, Contracts &Grants Published every Monday (Tuesday when Monday is a holiday) Monday 30 April 2007 Volume 31, Number 44 Pages 1469 - 1536 State Register Judicial Notice Shall Be Taken of Material Published in the State Register The State Register is the official publication of the State of Minnesota, published weekly to fulfill the legislative mandate set forth in Minnesota Statutes § 14.46. The State Register contains: • proposed, adopted, exempt, expedited emergency and withdrawn rules • executive orders of the governor • appointments • proclamations and commendations • commissioners’ orders • revenue notices • official notices • state grants and loans • contracts for professional, technical and consulting services • non-state public bids, contracts and grants • certificates of assumed name, registration of insignia and marks PUBLISHING NOTICES: Submit ONE COPY of your notice, typed double-spaced. State agency submissions must include a “State Register Printing Order” form, and a “Certification/Internal Contract Negotiation” form with contracts for professional, technical and consulting services. Non-State Agencies should submit ONE COPY, with a letter on your letterhead stationery requesting publication and date to be published. E-MAIL submissions to: [email protected], or FAX to: (651) 297-8260. Please follow FAX by sending originals and applicable forms or letters. The charge is $14.40 per tenth of a page (columns are seven inches wide). One typwritten, double-spaced page is about 4/10s of a page in the State Register, or $57.60. About 2-1/2 pages typed, double-spaced, on 8-1/2"x11" paper equal one typeset page in the State Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical Characterization of Two Ferruginous Meromictic Lakes in the Upper Midwest, USA Nicholas Lambrecht Iowa State University, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Repository @ Iowa State University Geological and Atmospheric Sciences Publications Geological and Atmospheric Sciences 10-1-2018 Geochemical Characterization of Two Ferruginous Meromictic Lakes in the Upper Midwest, USA Nicholas Lambrecht Iowa State University, [email protected] Chad Wittkop Minnesota State University, Mankato Sergei Katsev University of Minnesota - Duluth Mojtaba Fakhraee University of Minnesota - Duluth Elizabeth D. Swanner Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ge_at_pubs Part of the Atmospheric Sciences Commons, Biogeochemistry Commons, Geochemistry Commons, and the Oceanography Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ ge_at_pubs/261. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geological and Atmospheric Sciences at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geological and Atmospheric Sciences Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Geochemical Characterization of Two Ferruginous Meromictic Lakes in the Upper Midwest, USA Abstract To elucidate the role of (bio)geochemical processes that fueled iron and carbon cycling in early Earth oceans, modern environments with similar geochemical conditions are needed. As the range of chemical, physical, and biological attributes of the Precambrian oceans must have varied in time and space, lakes of different compositions are useful to ask and answer different questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Report
    MMINNEAPOLISINNEAPOLIS PPARKARK && RRECREATIONECREATION BBOARDOARD 20122012 WWATERATER RRESOURCESESOURCES RREPORTEPORT Environmental Stewardship Water Resources Management www.minneapolisparks.org January 2015 2012 WATER RESOURCES REPORT Prepared by: Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Environmental Stewardship 3800 Bryant Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55409-1029 612.230.6400 www.minneapolisparks.org January 2015 Funding provided by: Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board City of Minneapolis Public Works Copyright © 2015 by the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Material may be quoted with attribution. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... iv 1. Monitoring Program Overview .............................................................................................. 1-1 2. Birch Pond .............................................................................................................................. 2-1 3. Brownie Lake ......................................................................................................................... 3-1 4. Lake Calhoun ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 5. Cedar Lake ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minneapolis Public Works Department Minneapolis Park & Recreation
    NPDES MS4 Phase I Permit No. MN0061018 Annual Report for 2014 Activities City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Co-Permittees Prepared by: Minneapolis Public Works Department in conjunction with Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board July 31, 2015 NPDES MS4 PHASE I PERMIT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2014 ACTIVITIES Acknowledgements Public Works-Surface Water & Sewers Paul Chellsen Lane Christianson Kevin Danen Lois Eberhart Paul Hudalla Kelly Moriarity Matt Stonich Jeremy Strehlo John Studtmann Dick Thornbloom Karl Westermeyer Public Works - Transportation Maintenance & Repair Steve Collin Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Rachael Crabb Michael Perniel Debra Pilger MaryLynn Pulscher Health Department - Environmental Services Tom Frame Patrick Hanlon Regulatory Services Steve Kennedy Source: Minneapolis Public Works – Surface Water and Sewers ii Table of Contents Cover Page ...................................................................................................................................................... Signature Page ............................................................................................................................................... Certification and Resolution 2015R-303…………………………………………………………………... Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Management Plan Water Resources | City of St
    Surface Water Management Plan Water Resources | City of St. Louis Park Proposals are due 4:00 p.m. April 24, 2017 Executive Summary City of St. Louis Park Surface Water Management Plan Executive Summary Located in Hennepin County just west of Minneapolis, the 10.7-square-mile City of St. Louis Park is a fully developed suburban community. The population of St. Louis Park is approximately 48,000 residents, making it the 20th largest city in Minnesota. St. Louis Park contains a variety of physical and water resources including several wetlands and small lakes, wooded areas, parks, and recreational lands, as well as the Minnehaha Creek corridor. Two watershed management organizations (WMOs) cover St. Louis Park, each with its own governing body: the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). This local Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) was prepared in accordance with Minnesota Statute 103B.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410 and is intended to replace the 2009 plan. The purpose of this SWMP includes objectives outlined in Minnesota Statute 103B.201 for metropolitan water management programs. According to the statute, the purposes of these water management programs are to: • protect, preserve, and properly use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; • minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; • identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; • establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; • prevent the erosion of soil into surface water systems; • promote effective groundwater recharge; • protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitats and water recreational facilities; and • secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on Limnology, Second Edition
    BIOLOGICAL PHYSICAL lake zones formation food webs variability primary producers light chlorophyll density stratification algal succession watersheds consumers and decomposers CHEMICAL general lake chemistry trophic status eutrophication dissolved oxygen nutrients ecoregions biological differences The following overview is taken from LAKE ECOLOGY OVERVIEW (Chapter 1, Horne, A.J. and C.R. Goldman. 1994. Limnology. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill Co., New York, New York, USA.) Limnology is the study of fresh or saline waters contained within continental boundaries. Limnology and the closely related science of oceanography together cover all aquatic ecosystems. Although many limnologists are freshwater ecologists, physical, chemical, and engineering limnologists all participate in this branch of science. Limnology covers lakes, ponds, reservoirs, streams, rivers, wetlands, and estuaries, while oceanography covers the open sea. Limnology evolved into a distinct science only in the past two centuries, when improvements in microscopes, the invention of the silk plankton net, and improvements in the thermometer combined to show that lakes are complex ecological systems with distinct structures. Today, limnology plays a major role in water use and distribution as well as in wildlife habitat protection. Limnologists work on lake and reservoir management, water pollution control, and stream and river protection, artificial wetland construction, and fish and wildlife enhancement. An important goal of education in limnology is to increase the number of people who, although not full-time limnologists, can understand and apply its general concepts to a broad range of related disciplines. A primary goal of Water on the Web is to use these beautiful aquatic ecosystems to assist in the teaching of core physical, chemical, biological, and mathematical principles, as well as modern computer technology, while also improving our students' general understanding of water - the most fundamental substance necessary for sustaining life on our planet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Cloud Man a Dakota Leader Faces His Changing World
    RAMSEY COUNTY All Under $11,000— The Growing Pains of Two ‘Queen Amies’ A Publication o f the Ramsey County Historical Society Page 25 Spring, 2001 Volume 36, Number 1 The Life and Times of Cloud Man A Dakota Leader Faces His Changing World George Catlin’s painting, titled “Sioux Village, Lake Calhoun, near Fort Snelling.” This is Cloud Man’s village in what is now south Minneapolis as it looked to the artist when he visited Lake Calhoun in the summer of 1836. Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison, Jr. See article beginning on page 4. RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORY Executive Director Priscilla Farnham Editor Virginia Brainard Kunz RAMSEY COUNTY Volume 36, Number 1 Spring, 2001 HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Howard M. Guthmann CONTENTS Chair James Russell 3 Letters President Marlene Marschall 4 A ‘Good Man’ in a Changing World First Vice President Cloud Man, the Dakota Leader, and His Life and Times Ronald J. Zweber Second Vice President Mark Dietrich Richard A. Wilhoit Secretary 25 Growing Up in St. Paul Peter K. Butler All for Under $11,000: ‘Add-ons,’ ‘Deductions’ Treasurer The Growing Pains of Two ‘Queen Annes’ W. Andrew Boss, Peter K. Butler, Norbert Conze- Bob Garland mius, Anne Cowie, Charlotte H. Drake, Joanne A. Englund, Robert F. Garland, John M. Harens, Rod Hill, Judith Frost Lewis, John M. Lindley, George A. Mairs, Marlene Marschall, Richard T. Publication of Ramsey County History is supported in part by a gift from Murphy, Sr., Richard Nicholson, Linda Owen, Clara M. Claussen and Frieda H. Claussen in memory of Henry H.
    [Show full text]
  • Six FLOURING MILLS on MINNEHAHA CREEK
    -f**^ ^^^^1 THESE RUINS of the old Godfrey water wheel have long since disappeared from the banks of Minnehaha Creek. The wheel is typ­ ical of the ones that powered the old- fashioned gristmills. 162 Minnesota History The Six FLOURING MILLS on MINNEHAHA CREEK Foster W. Dunwiddie MUCH HAS BEEN written about the flour-milhng in­ enjoy for fifty years — from 1880 to 1930. But in the dustry of Minneapolis and the history of St. Anthony pioneer days of Minnesota Territory, hauling grain to Falls. With development of the immense water power Minneapolis and St. Anthony was an arduous task, espe­ available at the falls, Minneapolis grew to become the cially during certain seasons of the year. Roads were flour-milling capital of the world, a position it was to poor and often impassable. This led quite naturally to the demand for small local flouring mills that were more readily accessible to the farmers, and a great many flour­ ^Lucde M. Kane, The Waterfad That Built a City, 99, 17,3 ing mills were erected throughout the territory.^ (St. Paul, 1966). The term "flour" is taken from the French In the nineteenth century, Minnehaha Creek, which term "fleur de farine, " which literally means "the flower, or still flows from Gray's Bay in Lake Minnetonka almost finest, of the meal." The word "flouring" or "flowering" was applied to miUs in this country as early as 1797. The suffix, directly eastward to the Mississippi River, was a stream "ing," was added to form a verbal noun, used in this case as an having sufficient flow of water to develop the necessary adjective to describe the type of mill.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did Edina Become Edina?
    Edina Mill: A Fast Creek Generates Did you know that Minnehaha Creek Industry…and a Community was home to several milling operations? In fact, this area’s history was defined by mills built on this once wild and rushing creek. you are here How Did Edina St. Anthony Falls Mississippi River Gov’t Mill Grays Bay Dam St. Alban’s Mill Alban’s St. MINNEAPOLIS Become Edina? Lake Minnetonka Mill Minnetonka Minnehaha Creek Globe Mill Edina Mill Richfield Mill Nine Mile Creek he Waterville Mill was built at this Purgatory Creek Fort Snelling spot in 1857 by four partners looking Mill Godfrey to make use of fast-running waters T Eden in Minnehaha Creek. Land was purchased Prairie Mill Bloomington Mill and a dam installed at a natural cascade Minnesota River � in the creek. A millrace diverted current over a waterwheel to power the grinding Edina Mill Site and Browndale Bridge are locally of wheat, oats and barley. designated as Edina Heritage Landmarks A Scots emigre named Andrew Craik bought the mill in 1869 and re-christened it “Edina Mills” after his native Edinburgh. A nearby community would flourish and in time take its name from the mill— eventually becoming the Edina of today! Hennepin History Museum The Edina Mill saw its greatest use as the primary provider of flour to the Fort Snelling Reserve during the Civil War, operating 24 hours a day to supply the Union Army. The mill passed through many owners over the years and was converted by its last owner to turbine power in 1879, employing three turbines to drive the millstones—advanced technology for the time.
    [Show full text]
  • SECRETS of the BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED
    The Bassett Creek watershed begins in Cover Photo by Dan Johnson Dan by Photo Cover WHO WE ARE western Plymouth where ponds, wetlands, and AND WHAT WE DO swales or ditches drain to Plymouth Creek, The Bassett Creek Watershed which flows southeasterly before emptying into Management Commission the western side of Medicine Lake. (BCWMC) works to protect and Bassett Creek emerges from the southern Numerous pollutants are carried in the storm- improve the condition of lakes, edge of Medicine Lake and flows south and LIGHTEN YOUR STEP BE PART OF THE SOLUTION 7. TURN THE FLOW AROUND Trumpeter Swans: Photo by Dan Johnson water runoff, including: Lawn fertilizers, nutrients Direct a downspout back into your yard away from driveways Did you know the average home uses 100,000 streams, wetlands, and ponds then east, picking up water from the Sweeney from decaying grass clippings and leaves, pesticides, Twelve easy things you can do at home! and sidewalks where it can run off your property. Make a within its borders. The BCWMC Lake Branch and the North Branch of Bassett gallons of water per year? That’s 274 gallons a day. shallow depression away from your foundation where But that’s just the start. Each of us is a consumer of 1. BE A STORM DRAIN GOALIE downspout water can accumulate and soak in the ground. is a cooperative organization among the nine Rain water gets away from us too quickly sometimes (that must Creek before entering a tunnel and traveling 2.4 Better yet, save that water in a rain barrel and use the reservoir water on a far grander scale.
    [Show full text]