2 – Creek History, Background, and Evolution

Home , Lake Harriet (Minnesota), Minnehaha, Minnehaha Creek

Chapter 2 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION

This chapter will provide an overview of the history of Minnehaha Creek through the following lenses: » Cultural and Historical Context, including the history of pre-contact and post-European settlement, urban development and the development of structures surrounding the Creek, and the history of racial covenants in the area » Natural Resources Impact Over Time, including an overview of pre-settlement plant communities, the evolution of relationships connecting water resources, urbanization, estabishment of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and » Infrastructure as it relates to water resources, including current flood modeling and mitigation studies CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT This section provides an overview of park area history, including cultural resources that have been identified within the bounds of Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail, located in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Additional information about cultural resources within and adjacent to Minnehaha Creek and Minnehaha Parkway can be found in Chapter 7, including applicable legislative requirements regarding cultural resource preservation and an overview of previous cultural resources investigations in the vicinity. The cultural resources of the area and the stories they evoke informed the interpretive theme and subthemes (see Chapter 6: Interpretive Plan) as a way of Eastman Painting of a Dakota settlement (Source: Minneapolis Institute of Arts) engaging visitors and enhancing their experience along the Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail. OVERVIEW OF AREA HISTORY The lakes, rivers, and topography of Minneapolis are a result of the movement of glaciers during a series of ice ages thousands of years ago. The Mississippi River once flowed through present-day South Minneapolis. The river was diverted eastward to its present course because of a glacial advance (growth) at some time before 35,000 BCE, leaving behind what we now call the Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek. The Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail area has a long American Indian history, followed by industrial and recreational use tied to the development of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Present-day Minnehaha Parkway was planned around and along Minnehaha Creek as part of the City of Minneapolis’s comprehensive park system as early as 1889. Eastman Painting of Minnehaha Falls (Source: Minnesota Historical Society)

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-1 PRE-CONTACT AND CONTACT EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT Snelling via a wagon trail along Minnehaha Creek to reach the Lake District (present-day Chain of Lakes). Brown subsequently made the first land claim in HISTORY In 1822, 17-year-old Joseph Renshaw Brown journeyed from Minnehaha Falls, Hennepin County where Minnehaha Creek reaches the Mississippi River, and For thousands of years prior to the arrival of Europeans, ancestors of the located in present-day Minnehaha Regional Park, in search of its unknown built the first cabin along the creek. He also drafted the bill that created the Siouan people (including the Missouria, Otoe, Iowa, and Dakota) were western terminus; this was the first documented voyage along the entire Minnesota Territory, introduced in 1846. Subsequently, the creek was known living on the land that would later become known as Minnesota. They were Minnehaha Creek. Brown was a fifer and drummer boy with the U.S. Army at as Brown’s Creek, Brown’s River, Joe Brown’s Creek, Cascade Creek, Little River, comprised of mobile, compact bands of hunter-gatherers about 12,000 years Fort Snelling. He was accompanied by William J. Snelling, son of Colonel Josiah or Little Falls Creek. The name “Minnehaha” comes from the Dakota words mni ago, and denser settlements proficient in ceramic manufacturing and corn- Snelling, and two other soldiers from the Fort. Snelling turned back early, while (water) and gaga (falling or curling), and was used in reference to Minnehaha based horticulture by the 400s CE into the late 1700s. American Indians in Brown successfully reached the creek’s source at Gray’s Bay (present-day Lake Falls. The name was popularized in the 1855 poem by Henry Wadsworth what is now south-central Minnesota demonstrated resiliency and a complex Minnetonka). Following Brown’s initial journey, Euro-American settlers and Longfellow titled “Song of Hiawatha.” understanding of the ecological and social environments in which they lived. visitors alike were drawn to the Minnehaha Creek area. They traveled from Fort The earliest Euro-Americans in the land that was to become Minnesota were French missionaries and fur traders during the mid-to-late 1600s, followed by British, and later American, traders and explorers in the 1700s and 1800s. Within 200 years of arrival, Euro-Americans dramatically altered the environment and social landscape through the fur trade, warfare, settlement, and treaties. They also forced American Indians to find new ways to adapt to an Pope map. Pope military map - 1849 increasingly altered homeland. During the mid-1600s, the westward expansion of the fur trade and a growing European presence, as well as conflict between tribes resulted in the migration of the Ioway and Otoe south and west into Iowa and Nebraska. During this time, the Dakota more permanently settled in PROJECT AREA the area, due in part to the establishment of the Ojibwe in north and central Minnesota, and maintained a strong presence until treaties, war, disease, and forced removal diminished their numbers in the 1850s and 1860s.

Figure 2.1 The 1849 Pope Military Map labels Minnehaha Creek “Cascade Creek”

2-2 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 MILLING HISTORY By the mid-1800s, Minnehaha Creek supported a burgeoning flour-milling industry. Between 1855 and 1874, there were at least six flour mills in operation along the creek. At the east end, near Minnehaha Falls, Ard Godfrey built a sawmill in 1853 and a gristmill in 1857. The sawmill burned down in 1864 while the gristmill passed through several owners before being destroyed by fire in 1887. A second flour mill, known originally as the Richland Mill, colloquially as the Old Red Mill, and later as the Richfield Mills, was located to the southeast of Lake Harriet along Minnehaha Creek. The Richland Mill was likely demolished between 1886 and 1892. At least four more mills were located farther west along the creek. The Minnehaha Creek mills were typical 1800s flour mills, constructed of heavy timber and multi-storied to accommodate the vertical flow of the milling process. They made efficient use of their space and used wooden, overshot water wheels to harness water power from the creek. The flour mills contributed to the formation of centers of business and townships in the early years of the Minnesota Territory. For example, because the Richland Mill brought farmers together to process their wheat, the post office was established nearby. After Minnesota became a state in 1858, the government center for Richfield Township was established just south of the mill at present-day West 53rd Street and Lyndale Avenue. This area became the business, social, and political center of the township, which led to the construction of several stores, a school, and two churches as well. In 1897, Hennepin County built a wooden weir at the outlet of Lake Minnetonka and the headwaters of Minnehaha Creek, effectively bringing an end to the milling industry along the creek.

Godfrey Mills near Minnehaha Falls (Source: Minnesota Historical Society)

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-3 PARKWAY CREATION picturesque landscapes. Cleveland’s early maps of the park system depicted Loring stated, “In securing land to complete the Minnehaha Parkway, and in a continuous ribbon of recreational space. Minnehaha State Park (now called building the drive from Lyndale Avenue to Minnehaha Park, you have opened In 1883, shortly after the Minneapolis Board of Park Commissioners (MBPC; Minnehaha Regional Park), which is sited around Minnehaha Falls, was added for public use one of the most beautiful and useful parks in this or any other now the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board [MPRB]) was formed, it hired to the municipal park system in 1889. This action hastened public interest in city. Its area of nearly 200 acres, stretching from the lakes to the beautiful falls renowned landscape architect Horace William Shaler Cleveland to plan the connecting the park with Lake Harriet and Lake Calhoun (today Bde Maka of Minnehaha, contains the most picturesque and varied scenery of wooded city’s comprehensive park system. Cleveland’s plan was composed of a 20- Ska) to the west. Consequently, private citizens donated land along a curved hills, green meadows and running brook. It is a New England picture set in mile loop of parkways to provide access to lakes and parks. His plan became section of the creek between Lyndale Avenue on the east and 50th Street on a prairie frame …You have saved it to be a promoter of health, a source of known as the Grand Rounds. The park system was designed to highlight and the north to the MBPC so that a road could be built along each side of the pleasure and recreation, and an educator of the children who will live on its connect Minneapolis’ dramatic natural features, such as Minnehaha Falls, and creek. The roadway was initially called Minnehaha Boulevard, and later became borders, and enjoy the beautiful gifts of … these natural forests, meadows and Minnehaha Parkway. Cleveland retained and incorporated the existing mature streams to be within the limits of a great city.” oak, maple, ash, and basswood trees along the land acquired for the Grand Initially, the Grand Rounds allowed vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic. Rounds; he also introduced evergreen trees to enhance the winter landscape. By 1907, the MPBC converted the bicycle paths to bridle paths for horseback Establishment of the parkway as envisioned in 1889 continued through the riding. The bridle paths were removed by the mid-1900s. Bicycles regained end of the 1890s as the MBPC purchased land and accepted subsequent popularity in the 1960s, resulting in the construction of new bicycle paths donations from private property owners. In 1893, MBPC President Charles throughout the Grand Rounds in the 1970s.

1916 Map of Minneapolis Parks (Source: MPRB) 1912 Map of Improvements to Minnehaha Parkway, including straightening the Creek (Source: MPRB)

2-4 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 When Theodore Wirth became superintendent of the parks system in 1906, BRIDGES WALLS he embarked on an ambitious plan to add additional parkway land and There are several pedestrian and vehicular bridges that cross Minnehaha Throughout the Minnehaha Creek area, there are also stone and concrete walls significantly improve the existing parks and parkways. Horse-drawn traffic Creek that were constructed as part of the development of the Grand Rounds. where built to reinforce the creek’s banks. Additionally, there are granite and gave way to automobile traffic, which led to paving the parkways and required Since the parks system was established, some original timber bridges have limestone walls along the creek between Lyndale and Portland Avenues. In more road maintenance. From 1922 to 1925, after some financial delays, the been replaced with concrete and steel bridges. The vehicular bridges between 1936, “eight hundred feet of rip-rap was installed at various points along the MBPC widened and paved Minnehaha Parkway, which also became one of Godfrey Parkway and Zenith Avenue South were built between 1902 and 2011. creek,” in particular by 2nd, Stevens, and Luverne Avenues. Stone retaining the first parkways to be illuminated with new electric lights. Curbs, gutters, Some bridges feature stone facing and decorative details. Most of the vehicular walls were also built at 5th Avenue South in 1936-37; they were later modified and drainage systems were also added. Five concrete bridges were built along bridges carry cross-streets over the creek, except for one vehicular bridge that by concrete walls in 1959. In 1960, a reinforced concrete wall was built near with sidewalks and winding footpaths. In the early 1920s, the MBPC also carries the typically adjacent Minnehaha Parkway over the creek. The 1920s Pleasant Avenue. The walls built in the 1930s used stone quarried from a site in straightened a section of the creek between Lake Nokomis and Lake Hiawatha marked a significant period of bridge construction in which eight vehicular Minnehaha Park. The construction of many of the stone walls, as well as some to provide a more direct path, and in 1938, it straightened a sharp curve bridges were built around the same time as significant improvements were bridges, was funded through the Works Progress Administration. of Minnehaha Creek just west of Cedar Avenue to “improve water flow and made to the parkway. Several bridges were also built or rebuilt in the 1970s reduce soil erosion”. While these improvements may have produced desired and 1980s, along with other improvements along the Grand Rounds. Most Approximately 15% of the creek’s streambank is armored by concrete or results in the short-term at specific areas, soil erosion and increased flow of of the pedestrian bridges were rebuilt in 2002-2003, though two early steel masonry retaining walls, rip-rap, or other protection such as gabion baskets. water have continued to pose issues in areas where these changes have been footbridges built in the 1920s and 1930s remain (VERIFY FOR FINAL DRAFT). These are generally for the purpose of controlling erosion meandering to made. Wirth insisted that, despite these “corrections” to the course of the creek, prevent loss of property, stabilizing steep banks, or protecting structures such as bridges and storm sewer outfalls. great care was always taken to retain the natural landscape and “woodland DAMS atmosphere of the creek valley.” Following these changes, the 1930s and 1940s also saw significant residential development along Minnehaha Parkway, which During Wirth’s tenure as superintendent of the parks from 1906 and 1935, four continued into the 1950s (see the Urban Development Around the Creek dams were constructed along Minnehaha Creek. These four dams were located section that follows). near Lyndale Avenue, in the Washburn Park area, downstream of Lake Nokomis In the early 1970s, the MPRB made significant changes throughout the Grand (picture below) and downstream of Lake Hiawatha. There have been various Rounds, including narrowing roads, installing new walkways and bikeways, dam structures in place at the headwaters of Minnehaha Creek which are and updating benches, signs, and picnic tables. Along Minnehaha Parkway, discussed is the Lake Minnetonka Outlet Structures section that follows. trails were reoriented, several bridges were added and/or replaced, and More information on dams to be included in the final draft. roadways were modified. In particular, intersections were redesigned to maintain the continuity of the parkway system. Most of the signage along the parkway was added at this time. These changes were implemented to discourage commuter traffic, promote recreational driving, and create pathways that did not cross roadways. Today, the Grand Rounds remains one of the oldest, largest, and most intact linear park systems in the country. The Grand Rounds consists of 50 miles of parkways and nearly 6,000 acres of associated parkland, including the six- mile Minnehaha Parkway segment. Minnehaha Parkway affords the driver, cyclist, or pedestrian varied views of Minnehaha Creek. The parkway and creek also connect many neighborhoods in south Minneapolis. Locals and tourists continue to be enamored by the setting of the creek, resulting in numerous artistic depictions and descriptive narratives.

1880 Photograph of the Creek at Penn Ave (Source: MNHS) Boy fishing at the dam downstream of Lake Nokomis, circa 1940s (Source: Hennepin County Library)

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-5 URBAN DEVELOPMENT AROUND THE Natural Resources [DNR]) that proposed the creation of the Minnehaha Creek HISTORY OF RACIAL COVENANTS Watershed District (MCWD) in Hennepin and Carver counties. The purpose of CREEK the district was to improve water storage, drainage, and other public purposes In in the early 1900s, across the country and in Minneapolis, real estate Land in what is now south Minneapolis was first made available for claims along the creek; divert or change part of the course of the water; control or developers and public officials included racially restrictive language in in 1849, after Minnesota became a territory. Early claims were made around alleviate floodwater damage and soil erosion; prevent siltation; reclaim wet property deeds. These racial covenants prohibited mortgages or leases the lakes to take advantage of the waterfront. Bureau of Land Management and overflowed lands; provide and conserve water; and provide for sanitation to individuals of specific ethnic backgrounds, including African and Asian General Land Office (BLM GLO) plat maps from 1854 and 1888 show and public health. The watershed district was formally created under the ethnicities. The earliest identified restrictive deed in south Minneapolis dates Minnehaha Creek and the surrounding landscape with little development. In Minnesota Watershed District Act in 1967 and remains active today in guiding to 1910. In many cases, entire blocks were subject to these restrictions. those maps, land near lakes such as Harriet and Amelia (now Nokomis), as well the maintenance of the creek. Additionally, banks practiced redlining, which placed restrictions on loans in as along the creek itself, was shown parceled into large plots with no urban racially mixed neighborhoods, making it difficult for non-white individuals to development. By the late 1880s, south Minneapolis had been platted up to purchase property. Homeowners Loan Corporation Maps like the one shown 54th Street South, which included land around Minnehaha Creek. However, below, ranked predominantly white neighborhoods “Best,” which, along with very little had been constructed south of Franklin Avenue. discriminatory lending practices, helped to perpetuate segregation that is still The western end of the creek near Lake Harriet began to be developed in present in Minneapolis today. the late 1800s by several prominent local families. It continued to attract The greatest concentration of racial covenants was found in neighborhoods wealthy Minneapolitans as residents as the area developed. In the rest of south facing parkland, including those along Minnehaha Creek and Lake Nokomis. Minneapolis, development followed the streetcar corridors. After World War I Such covenants made it nearly impossible for individuals, especially African and with the rise of the automobile, development rapidly increased, especially Americans, to acquire stable and affordable housing, which in turn affected in areas not accessible by streetcar. Additionally, improvements to the park educational and job opportunities as well as health for future generations. and parkway system made neighborhoods around the lakes, Minnehaha Racial covenants were banned in Minnesota in 1953, five years after the Creek, and the river more desirable. In the 1920s, particularly between what Supreme Court declared them to be unenforceable. See Figure 2.3 for a map of is now I-35W and Lake Nokomis, neighborhoods were designed to emphasize racial covenants near Minnehaha Parkway. the landscape and picturesqueness of Minnehaha Creek. Developers aimed to preserve vegetation, hilly lots, and waterfront views. Starting in the 1930s, development ramped up to the south of Minnehaha Creek. By the 1950s, there were few empty lots left in the neighborhoods adjacent to the creek, based on Hennepin County parcel data. In south Minneapolis, it was most common to build single-family, owner-occupied houses. Housing around Minnehaha Creek and Lake Nokomis was typically above the city’s average in size, value, and design quality. East of Lake Nokomis, housing was more modest and vernacular. This housing boom in south Minneapolis meant wetlands were filled, Minnehaha Creek was straightened and ditched, greenspace was converted into rooftops, pavement and concrete. All of this development meant more runoff into Minnehaha Creek which lead to an increase in flooding and pollution. In the mid-1960s, flooding along Minnehaha Creek prompted residents in 1966 to petition Hennepin County for the formation of a district to conserve waters and natural resources across the watershed. The following year in 1967 the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was established. In 1966, a petition was delivered to the Director of the Division of Waters in the Minnesota Department of Conservation (now the Minnesota Department of

Figure 2.2 Segment of a Homeowners Loan Corporation (HOLC) Map along Minnehaha Parkway showing the area graded “Best” (green areas on map)

2-6 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 Figure 2.3 Map of Racial Covenants near Minnehaha Parkway (source: Mapping Prejudice, April 2020 )

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-7 Ç ¾55 Wirth 9¤£52A Lake M tt k i Basse Cr e e ssis sipp Ba i Ri Ç sse ve t t C reek r ¾55 Wirth 9¤£52A Lake M Bassett Cr ek Ç issi e ssip 394 ¾280 pi R ¨¦§ 3¨¦§94W Bass iv Crane e e t t ek r Lake C re Ç ¨¦§94 Ç ¾65 ¾ NATURAL RESOURCES §394 394W ¾280 Crane ¨¦ ¨¦§ Cedar Lake Lake Ç ¨¦§94 IMPACT OVER TIME ¾65 Cedar Lake PRE-SETTLEMENT VEGETATION/ Minnehaha Creek PLANT COMMUNITIES Parkway The land where Minneapolis was settled is part of the Eastern Broadleaf Bass Lake Calhoun Waterbodies Lake Minnehaha Creek Forest biome. Minnehaha Creek flows through an area that was originallyÇ oak Ç Streams/Rivers Parkway ¾7 ¾55 Wirth 9¤£52A openings and barrens. Frequent fires maintained tree cover between 10-30% Bass BdeLak Makae Calho Skaun Lake M Waterbodies tt k Lake i Ç Minnehaha Creek so that tall-grass prairie species grew in between stands of oaks. Birds perchedBasse Cr e e ssis sipp ¾55 Ba i Ri Watershed Ç sse ve Streams/Rivers t k r on sturdy branches spread seeds at the base of the trees, which resulted ¾7 t C ree in understory shrubs including raspberry and hazelnut. Along the Creek, Ç Presettlement Vegetation ¾100 Ç Ç Minnehaha Creek 394 ¾280 ¾55 floodplain forest species like cottonwood, silver maple,Cr anandÇe green ash shaded ¨¦§ 3¨¦§94W Prairie Watershed Lak¾e55 Wirth Lake Harriet 9¤£52A and cooled the water. ¤£169 Lake Ç ¨¦§35W M Ç 94 Presettlement Vegetation B sett C k iss ¨¦§ Wet Prairie as r e e is¾1s00 ¾ k ippi ¾65 a Cree Ba Ri ah sse ve h Prairie t t ek r nne Shady C re Cedar Mi Lake Harriet Oak Openings and Lake 35W Oak ¤£169 Lake ¨¦§ Barrens Lake Ç Wet Prairie N¾okomis Cree k ¨¦§394 394W ¾280 ha CraneÇ ¨¦§ ha Big Woods - Hardwoods inne Lake ¾55 Wirth Shady 9¤£52A M Oak Openings and Oak (Oak, Maple, Basswood, Lake M Ç ¨¦§94 Lake Barrens tt k i Basse Cr e e Lake ssis ¾65 Hickory) sipp Nokomis Minnehaha Creek Ba i Ri sse ve Big Woods - Hardwoods t t C reek Cedar r ConifePra Brkowgasy and Lake Ç (Oak, Maple, Basswood, Lake Calhoun Ç Swamps Ç Bass Ç ¾121¾ Waterbodies Hickory) ¨¦§394 394W Lake ¾62 ¾280 ¾55 CraneÇ Wirth 9¤£52A ¨¦§ River Bottom Forest Lake ¾55 Lake Wirth M 9¤£Ç52A N Streams/Rivers Conifer Bogs and B ett C k is in ass r e e siss ¾7 emi Ç 94 Ç Lake ipp M le Creek ¨¦§ Swamps B ett C k Ba i Ri is ¾65 Ç Lakes (open water) ass r e e sse ve siss ¾121 Minnehaha Creek t t C eek r ipp Ç Minnehaha Creek r Ba i Ri ¾62 sse ve ¾ River Bottom Forest Cedar r 5P5 arkway t t C reek Watershed Lake Ç Ni Ç Bryant nem ¤£212 ¾ Bass Lake Calhoun ile Cre ¾55 ¨¦§394 Wirth3¨¦§94W 9¤£52ALake 280 ÇÇ ek Waterbodies Presettlement Vegetation Lakes (open water) Crane Lake ¾¾ Ç Lake Lake ¨¦§394 3§94W M ¾102080 ett k Crane ¨¦ is Bass Cr e e siÇss ¾77 Lake Ç 94ipp Streams/Rivers Prairie Ba ¾¨¦§ i Ri sse ¾65 ¾7 ve Bryant Lake Harriet t t ek r Ç 94 ¤£212 C re £169¨¦§ Lake 35W ¾65 ¤ Ç¨¦§Minnehaha Creek Minnehaha Creek Wet Prairie Cedar er Ç Ç ¾55 a Cree k iv Lake Parkway ah WatershÇed R ¾77 Cedar h a 394 Sou F ¾280 nne ¾ t 394W th o i 5 o ± ¨¦§ § Lake r M Oak Openings and Crane ¨¦ Shady k s Bass NinLaemkeil Ce aClrheoun e Lake Oak e k Ç Waterbodies Presettlement Vegn etation Barrens Lake n LLaakkee ¾100 ¨¦§494 i 1 0.5 0 1 r Ç 94 e ¨¦§ Nokomis M v i Ç ¾65 Ç R Streams/Rivers Prairie Big Woods - Hardwaoods Sou F ¾ t Lake Harriteht o 5 o ± ¾ r 7 k Miles s Cedar £169 MinneNihneamhilae Crereek 35W (Oak, Maple, Basse wood, ¤ Long Meadow n e k ¨¦§ Lake Ç Minnehaha Creek Wet Prairie n Minnehaha Creek 494 Lake i Parkway ree k ¨¦§ Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\PreseHttleimcenkt_oVergyeta)tion.mxd 1 0.5 0 1 ¾55 ha C M Parkway ha Watershed Lake Calhoun inne Oak Openings and Bass Shady Legend Waterbodies M Conifer Bogs and Miles Lake OBakss Lake Calhoun Ç Waterbodies ÇLake Presettlement Vegetation Barrens Long Meadow Lake ¾100 SwampLsake Ç Lake Streams/Rivers Ç N¾1o21komis Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\Presettlement_Vegetation.mxd ¾7 Ç Minnehaha Creek ¾62 Prairie Big Woods - Hardwoods Lake Harriet MPRT Master Plan Streams/Rivers River Bottom Forest ¾7 N Minnehaha Creek (Oak, Maple, Basswood, ¤£169 Ç ine ¨¦§35WStudyParkw Areaay mi ¾55 le Creek Minnehaha Creek Wet Prairie Hickory) Ç Watershed ee k Lakes (open water) Bass Lake Calhoun ha Cr ¾55Waterbodies ha Lake nne Watershed Ç Shady PresettlemenMt iVegetation Oak Openings and Conifer Bogs and Ç ¾100 Oak Bryant Streams/Rivers Ç Barrens Ç ¤£212 Lake Presettlement Vegetation Swamps ¾7 Lake Lake Ç ¾121 ¾100 ¾ Prairie Nokomis Lake Harriet Ç 6M2 innehaha Creek Prairie Big Woods - HardwÇoods River Bottom Forest ¤£169 ¨¦§35W ¾77 Lake Harriet Ni ¾55 Wet Prairie (Oak, Maple, Basswood, nem Watershed ¤£169 Oak Openings and Barrens (Source: Susan Crispin, MSU)ree k i¨¦§l3e5WC Figure 2.4 Pre-settlement Vegetation ha C reek Wet Prairie Lakes (open water) ha Hickory) inne a Cree k Shady Ç M h PresettlemOaenk tO Vpeegneintagtsio annd er ha iv Oak ¾100 inne Ç R Shady Lake M Barrens Oak Openings and Conifer Bogs and a DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 2-8 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN Sou F ¾ t Bryant th o 5 o ± Lake r Prairie Oak £212 Nokomis k Ç s ¤ Barrens Swamps e Lake Harriet Lake Ninemile Cre Lake Lake Ç e k ¾121 n 35W Nokomis Big Woods - Hardwoods n ¤£169 ¨¦§ ¾62 ¨¦§494 Ç i 1 0.5 0 1

Wet Prairie M (Oak, Maple, Basswood, Big Woods - Hard¾7w7 oods River Bottom Forest a Cree k Ni h nem ha Hickory) (Oak, Maple, Basswood, ile Cre inne Oak Openings and Miles Shady ek M Hickory) Lakes (open water) Long Meadow Oak er Lake Lake BarCreonsifer Bogs and iv Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\Presettlement_Vegetation.mxd Lake Ç R Nokomis Ç Sou F Conifer Bogs and ¾ ta th o Swamps 5 o ± Bryant r Ç k Big Woods - Hardwoods s ¾121 e ¤£212 ¾ Ninemile Cre Ç Lake ¾62 e k Swamps n Ç n ¾121 ¨¦§494 (OaRki,v eMra Bpolett,o Bma sFÇsowreosotd, i 1 0.5 0 1 N ¾62 M ine Hickory) ¾77 River Bottom Forest mile C reek Nin Lakes (open water) Miles emi le Creek Conifer Bogs and Lakes (open water) Long Meadow er Lake Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\Presettlement_Vegetation.mxd Ç Swamps iv Bryant Ç ¾121 Ç R ¤£212 Sou F ¾5 ta th o o ± ¾62 r Lake Bryant k s 212 Ninemile Cre River Bottom Forest e £ n Lake ¤ e k Ç N n i 494 i nem ¾77 ¨¦§ 1 0.5 0 1 il Ç M e Creek Lakes (open water) ¾77 Miles er Long Meadow iv Bryant Ç R r Lake Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\Presettlement_Vegetation.mxd ¤£212 a e Lake Sou F ¾ t iv th o 5 o ± r Ç R k s Ninemile Cre F Ç e ¾ ta Sou n ¾ th o 5 o ± e k r s k n

494 ¾ i e Ninemile Cre ¨¦§ ¾77 1 0.5 0 1 n e k M n ¨¦§494 i 1 0.5 0 1 Miles M er Long Meadow iv Ç R Miles Lake a Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\Presettlement_Vegetation.mxd Sou F ¾ t Long Meadow th o 5 o ± r k s Lake e Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\Presettlement_Vegetation.mxd Ninemile Cre e k n n ¨¦§494 i 1 0.5 0 1

Miles Long Meadow Lake Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\Presettlement_Vegetation.mxd S

v e

e v

v E 49th St A

h S

o h

e S

t t

e 0

i 4

l WATER RESOURCES A

k A

v r

t o

a l

l l

k E

m PRE-SETTLEMENT WATER RESOURCES e

r Prior to settlement, Minnehaha Creek’s alignment moved around naturally 3

E Minnehaha Pkwy carving new flow paths (see Figure 2.5). As shown in Figure 2.6, much of e

S 50th St E St E 50th o wy e haha Pk g Minnehaha Creek’s alignment as mapped in the 1850s original land survey E Minne v

C a E

(denoted as the blue “Streams” line in Figure 2.6) was located approximately t M r ha i ha o n inne ne M P E kwy h P one to two city blocks further north than its present day location (purple y a S w h a k e P v P Figure 2.5 Alignments of Minnehaha Creek k

A w a t y dashed line denoted at “Current Minnehaha Creek Alignment in Figure 2.6). d S h

e v n a th 2 h A 0

5 e

ne E n Additionally as noted in Figure 2.6, Minnehaha Creek used to flow within an n

i r Sources:

W M W

5 5

E u 3 3 E 51st St

L E 51st St

approximately-sized 200-acre wetland complex located between present day v

H H

T S

S 1896 alignment is based on USGS Topo 1896 Edition

I I

Interstate 35W and Lake Hiawatha (denoted as the green “Wetlands”). This l

O S

A e A 1912 is based on the 1912 General Plan for Improvement of

former 200-acre wetland complex would have been around the same size v

k A

h Minnehaha Parkway

t o

t i

m l

A 0 l

as present day Lake Nokomis and would have naturally buffered Minnehaha

P l E

r o o A

o r

C v t

e l

m L a

Creek and provided additional water quantity capacity. y eet Current (Modern) alignment was digitized based on recent aerial u S nd v r

r A e ¯v r a

n T e photography e

Figure 2.6 1850’s Land Survey with Current Minnehaha Creek Alignment Source: MCWD

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-9 URBANIZATION AND FLOODING Minneapolis became urbanized over the 1930s and 1940s with peak population in the 1950s. The developed prior to any stormwater or wetland regulations. As a result, the 200-acre wetland complex shown in Figure 2.6 was filled, and Minnehaha Creek was ditched and straightened. The alignment was shifted and ultimately disconnected from the natural floodplain. These major landscape alterations (filling wetlands, straightening the creek) over the 1930- 1950s were implemented during a time when precipitation patterns were were generally much drier than today and flood risk seemed low. According to the DNR State Climatology Office, the average annual precipitation in the 1930s was 23.88 inches, in the 1940s was 25.72 inches, and in the 1950s was 24.97 inches. In comparison, the DNR State Climatology Office reported that the 2010s were the wettest decade since record keeping began in 1871, and that during this period the annual precipitation average at the Minneapolis airport was nearly 37 inches – more than six inches above average and nearly a foot more than experienced during the urbanization era of 1930s to 1950s.

Due to Minnehaha Creek’s altered hydrology (altered wetlands, channel straightening, and increased impervious surfaces), flooding along the creek in Minneapolis occurs often during large or extended rain events. Images of historic flooding are shown in the images below. May and June of 1944 reported above-normal precipitation and resulted in spring flooding along Minnehaha Creek. As Minneapolis was trending towards its peak population, with more greenspace being converted to residential and commercial uses, flooding became more common for residents living along Minnehaha Creek. Figure 2.7 Development in Minnehaha Creek Watershed’s lower subwatershed In older communities, such as Minneapolis, storm drainage was conveyed via pipe networks before the area draining to the systems were fully developed. As the land developed over time, these storm drains often could not manage the increased amount of runoff without backing up and flooding low areas, including parks and roadways. This type of flooding is called “urban flooding”, which is caused by excessive runoff due to lack of permeable area to absorb rainfall and by inadequacies of the storm drain system to handle runoff to an outfall.

In the second and third-ring suburbs, development largely occurred after stormwater regulations were in place, which means that the upper part of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has a greater capacity to manage flooding. Downstream, where Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail is located, the majority of the city relies on storm sewer networks to quickly move stormwater into pipes, and discharge into waterbodies via outfalls. This system High water along Minnehaha Creek, 1944. Source: MN Historical Society Flooding of Minnehaha Parkway at 13th Ave, 1944. Source: Minneapolis Tribune

2-10 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 of stormwater management creates large bounces (fluxuations) in the water sandbagging their yards against the rising water, and Minnehaha Parkway levels of lakes and streams because they are subject to a significant inundation from Chicago Avenue to Cedar Avenue also had to be closed for a almost a of runoff in a short amount of time. Additionally, increases in stream flow rates week. contributes to streambank erosion which negatively impacts water quality. A February 25, 1966 Minneapolis Star article detailed a public meeting which 1965 and 1966 brought back-to-back years of major flooding along Minnehaha involved officials from the city, county, state and federal agencies and was Creek. 1965 currently ranks as the fourth wettest year on record for the Twin sponsored by the Citizens for Minnehaha Creek Emergency Water Control. Cities and had a particularly wet spring, including nearly eight-inches of rain in This article described that during this meeting a resident who lived on the the month of May. The very next year in February 1966 another severe flooding 5100 block of Morgan Avenue South, who was a leader of the Citizens for event occurred along Minnehaha Creek due to ice jams. The February 20, 1966 Minnehaha Creek Emergency Water Control group and who helped sponsor Minneapolis Tribune included a full page of flood photos and the map below the meeting “asked for governmental action on three fronts. He suggested which details various landmarks and flood spots along the creek in February immediate steps be taken to control the creek waters, that safety precautions 1966. The text below this Minneapolis Tribune map noted that residents along around the ice-covered area be taken and that a watershed district be formed the 5100 block of Morgan Avenue South feared they would have to evacuate as a long-term solution to the creek problem.” their homes, residents between Portland Avenue and Penn Avenue were

Residents prepare for floodwaters along Minnehaha Creek in 1966 (Source: MCWD)

Feb 20, 1966 Article in the Minneapolis Tribune with Map of Flood Areas Feb 19, Citizens for Minnehaha Creek Emergency Water Control Meeting Source: Minneapolis Star

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-11 ESTABLISHMENT OF MCWD On April 12, 1966, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners petitioned the Minnesota Water Resources Board under authority of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 112 (now 103D) to establish the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). The cited purposes for the MCWD were to: » Conserve the watershed’s waters and natural resources » Improve lakes, marshes, and channels for water storage, drainage, recreation, and other public purposes » Reduce flooding » Keep silt from entering streams » Control land erosion » Reclaim wetlands » Control stormwater » Preserve water quality in lakes and streams

On March 9, 1967 the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) was established under the authority of the state legislature through the Minnesota Watershed District Act. The Minneapolis Star published an article the next day on March 10, 1967 which noted, “The district was proposed by the Hennepin County Board last April following resolutions urging a watershed district to relieve flood problems in South Minneapolis”. MCWD initiated a regulatory program during its founding year in 1967 to mitigate the impacts of new land development on water resources within the watershed, including stormwater management rules to manage peak runoff from new land development to minimize detrimental impacts from flooding. Since 1968, MCWD has been collecting annual hydrologic monitoring data from throughout the watershed. MCWD currently has one of the best long- term water quality and quantity databases in the Twin Cities metro. MCWD’s Figure 2.8 Map of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed (Source: MCWD) first water management plan was prepared in 1969 and focused on addressing three issues: flood control, low water levels during dry periods, and water pollution. Recommendations from this 1969 plan included reducing flooding along Minnehaha Creek by constructing an outlet control structure to regulate discharge from Lake Minnetonka and removing all sewage treatment plant effluent from Lake Minnetonka to improve water quality.

2-12 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 Mediiciine Lake

456723 456788 456781 456766 45676 102 61 4567 4567 156 1456727 4567156 Ç Ç 456 reek ¾¾47 456727 assetttt C ¾¾65 456752 456730 B 9¤£52A 45672 Ç M Medicine Lake ii ¾55 ss Ç ¾55 iis sii ¾2¾80 pp B ii R 34567788 40 Ba 81 456723 iiver 4567 4567 sse 4567 456766 45676 102 tttt k 456715 61 4567 Cre e 4567 1456756 Ç 1456727456732 Ç 1722 eek ¾47 456 456727 ¤£12 t C3r94 736 asset ¨¦§394 394W ¾65 456752 456 456730 Crane B ¨¦§ 9¤£52A Lake 72 456 34 ¨¦§94 4567 Ç M i 73 ¾ ss Ç 4567 ¾55 is 45675 Cedar si ¾280 Miinnehaha Watershed pp i R 37 40Lake Ba iver 4567 4567 sse Grays15 tt C k Miinnehaha Creek Parkway 4567 Lake off tthree e 456732 Bay IIslles 456733 456716 1456722 Land Cover Class ¤£12 394 456736 Crane ¨¦§ 3§94W 743 456725¨¦ 4567 73 Lake 4567 Non-Imperviious 34 45675 ¨¦§94 4567 ek rre Lake Miinnehaha C 456773 Bass Bde Maka 45675 Imperviious Cedar Callhoun 48 Minnehaha Watershed Lake Ska 4567 Lake Ç MPRTLake sMaster/Pond Plans Study Area Grays Ç Ç Minnehaha Creek Parkway ¾¾ ¾1¾00 Lake of the ¨¦§35W Bay 7 Isles 456733 Ç Riiver 456716 20 456735 ¾¾55 Land Cover Class 4567 456722 152 43 4567 456725 4567 3 4567 456742 Non-Impervious 45675 ¤£169 ek re Lake Lake M nehaha C 45673 Bass Impervious in CalhouHnarriiett 48 Lake 456746 4567 Ç Ç Lakes/Ponds ¾100 ¨¦§35W ¾7 456721 Ç River 20 456735 4567 456722 Lake ¾55 145675N2okomiis 456742 Gllen ¤£169 1456758 Lake Lake 456760 45673 456761 Harriet 456746 456717 Ç 62 4567 456721 ¾1¾21 Ç Lake N iine ¾¾62 Nokomis mii 456731 2705 lle Creek 456 53 7035 7053 Glen 4567 74567035 74567053 1456758 Lake 456760 Bryan45676tt 1 Lake 456717 Ç 62 45674 4567 ¾121 Ç Pu 456732 rrg 39 Ç ¾¾77 a 4567 N ttory C ine ¾ err rr m 62 31 ¤£212 i 4567 Ç 24567iiv05 ee le Ç Creek 752 RR e Soutth F 4567 ¾¾5 ¾ a k o rrk a 53 tt ¾¾5 N ile C 4567 74567035 74567053 N ile o em o iin rree k 494 ss Bryant ¨¦§ ee nn ±

nn Lake i i

MM 28 1 0..5 0 1 4567 45671 Long 45674 456734 Ç Pu 456732 Meadow rg 39 ¾77 a 4567 Lake Miilles tory C er r ¤£212 Ç v e i Ç 752 R Patth:: V::\\GIIS\\1614\\0003\\MXD\\IImperrvviiouss_Covverr_WS_Sccalle..mxxd e South F 456 ¾5 k o rk a Figure 2.9 ¾ Impervious5 Surface within Minnehaha Creek WatershedN ile C t em o in ree k 494 s ¨¦§ e n ±

n DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 i CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-13 M 28 1 0.5 0 1 4567 1 Long 456734 4567 Meadow Lake Miles

Path: V:\GIS\1614\0003\MXD\Impervious_Cover_WS_Scale.mxd LAKE MINNETONKA OUTLET STRUCTURES MCWD’s proposal identified an adjustable dam structure that would allow For over 120 years, discharges from Lake Minnetonka into Minnehaha Creek Lake Minnetonka to be used as a storage reservoir and reduce downstream have been influenced by various outlet structures. In 1897, Hennepin County flooding along Minnehaha Creek. The adjustable dam was also identified to constructed an approximately 700-ft long wooden weir with a wood planking reduce winter flooding along the creek by being able to control or stop winter spillway that was about 130 feet wide at the outlet of Lake Minnetonka to discharge. Ultimately the operating plan was reviewed by local communities maintain (as nearly as practicable) a lake elevation of 928.635 feet (NGVD, and approved by the Minnesota DNR. 1929 datum). In 1932 the wooden weir was repaired by a Hennepin County contractor. During this repair, wood sheet piling was used to create a wood weir notch approximately 200 feet long. In 1944, the wooden structure was repaired again by Hennepin County. During the 1944 repair, wood sheet piling was installed approximately two feet upstream of the 1932 wood weir structure, and when completed, the 1944 structure had timber sheet piling 213 feet long with a 194-ft timber spillway. This wooden sheet pile weir was in place for 82 years (1897-1979) and allowed water to flow into Minnehaha Creek anytime Lake Minnetonka was above 928.635 feet, including during the winter. Frequent discharges over the winter months would refreeze at downstream locations along Minnehaha Creek, forming layers of ice that resulted in ice-jams in culverts and under road bridges. In February 1966, when the severe flooding was occurring along Minnehaha Creek, Lake Minnetonka’s level was near 929.55 feet (NGVD, 1929), meaning almost one-foot of water was flowing unrestricted over the 194-foot long timber spillway structure into Minnehaha Creek. This unrestricted winter discharge caused significant ice issues along Minnehaha Creek and resulted in the severe flooding described in the previously. Two years after it was established, MCWD’s first water management plan was drafted in 1969 and recommended reducing flooding along Minnehaha Creek by constructing an outlet control structure at Lake Minnetonka to regulate the discharge into Minnehaha Creek. In 1973, the cities of Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, and Minnetonka, as well as the MPRB, formally petitioned MCWD to undertake a series of improvements along Minnehaha Creek, including a new headwaters control structure and repair of the existing weir at the outlet of Lake Minnetonka. For approximately a decade, MCWD monitored hydrology, carried out engineering studies, developed a computer model to simulate the Lake Minnetonka watershed and operation of a variable control structure, coordinated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota DNR on permit requirements, and held numerous public meetings to gain public input on the preliminary outlet control structure designs and operating plan.

Construction of weir on Lake Minnetonka, 1897. Source: Hennepin County Library

2-14 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 GRAYS BAY DAM In the fall of 1979, MCWD began construction on the new Headwaters Control The management goals of the operating plan are: Structure, also known as the Gray’s Bay Dam. This new structure consisted of 1. To reduce downstream flooding by controlling the discharge to Minnehaha three rectangular concrete bays, 10 feet wide, with an adjustable stainless- Creek to a rate not exceeding the maximum carrying capacity of the creek steel gate in each bay. In addition to the dam structure, an emergency spillway whenever the Lake Minnetonka water level is within the physical limits of was built at the location of the previous 1944 wood sheet pile weir. The new control. spillway consisted of a 202-foot long steel sheet-pile weir with a uniform crest 2. To reduce flooding on the lake by stabilizing lake levels between the elevation of 930 feet (NGVD 1929), which allows water to flow unrestricted out elevation of the low point on the previous fixed weir (928.6) and the of the lake if elevations are above 930 feet. ordinary high water level (OHW) elevation 929.4. MCWD operates this structure in accordance with the Headwaters Control 3. To reduce flooding, on the lake and downstream, by temporarily increasing Structure Management Policy and Operating Procedures, which was reviewed or decreasing discharge rates to accommodate predictable and large by local municipalities and approved by the Minnesota DNR. Operation of the volumes of runoff into Lake Minnetonka or downstream prior to the time dam is intended to emulate the historic discharge hydrograph of the natural such runoff occurs. outlet of Lake Minnetonka. The operating plan prescribes discharge zones 4. To provide discharges, during and/or following dry periods, comparable to based on the time of year, the existing lake level, capacity of Minnehaha Creek, discharges that occurred historically under similar lake level conditions such and forecast precipitation. The operating plan also requires that the lake be that the detrimental effects of creek flow stagnation are not aggravated as a drawn down every fall to an elevation of 928.60 feet to create storage for result of operating procedures. spring snowmelt, which allows the lake to be used as a storage basin. 5. To enhance recreation, wildlife and aquatic life survival, and aesthetics, when feasible and consistent with the Management Policy, by augmentation of creek flow beyond the time discharges from Lake Minnetonka have historically ceased. 6. To improve or maintain conditions on the lake and the creek, over those which existed prior to construction of the Headwaters Control Structure.

April 25, 1978 Article in the Minneapolis Star announcing approval of Grays Bay dam proposal

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-15 CLIMATE CHANGE AND 2014 FLOOD EVENT Climate change brings with it more uncertain weather, from frequent rain events with higher intensities than previously experienced, to longer periods of drought. The Minnesota DNR State Climatology Office reports that the 2010s were the wettest decade on record in the Twin Cities since record- keeping began in 1871. Eight of the decade’s 10 years were wetter than recent climatological averages, and no six-year period on record is even close to as wet as 2014 through 2019. 2014 brought the largest flood in recent history. 2016 was the second wettest year on record, and 2019 was the wettest year ever on record. During the last decade, the annual precipitation average at the Minneapolis airport was nearly 37 inches—more than six inc¬hes above average. The departure from historic precipitation patterns is shown in Figure 2.11. In 2014, the Twin Cities saw the wettest first half of the year on record, and the month of June was the wettest month ever on record with over 11 inches of rain. Coupled with a long winter and late snowmelt, this extreme precipitation led to a record flow of 889 cubic feet per second Minnehaha Creek and prolonged flooding throughout most of the spring and summer. This record precipitation across the Twin Cities resulted in a Federal Disaster Declaration for Hennepin County. In the fall of 2014, MCWD completed a flood damage assessment of Minnehaha Creek and coordinated the results of that assessment with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA awarded MCWD grant funds to repair the flood damage along Minnehaha Creek. MCWD implemented repairs at nine sites between 2018 and January 2020. After the 2014 flooding and in an effort to address the flood threats caused by our changing weather, MCWD has partnered with the National Weather Service (NWS), Hennepin County, and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to enhance how it operates the Gray’s Bay Dam. The NWS provides MCWD with seven-day precipitation forecasts and a prediction for how that precipitation will affect water levels. With this information, MCWD can proactively create storage for the forecasted precipitation. Dam discharge can then be reduced before rainstorms and that storage is used to prevent flooding in Minnehaha Creek. MCWD also uses real time weather data provided through weather stations installed on MCWD properties, which are part of the Hennepin West Mesonet. Additionally, the MCWD, Hennepin County and the USGS have real-time water level sensors located across MCWD which provides real- time data on water level changes on the upper streams that drain into Lake Figure 2.10 Twin Cities average annual precipitation and counts of days with heavy precipitation, defined as one inch or more falling in a calendar Minnetonka, Lake Minnetonka itself, and along the 23 miles of Minnehaha day. (credit: DNR State Climatology Office) Creek. Combined, these partnerships have greatly improved MCWD’s ability to effectively predict, manage, and monitor the effects of changing weather, to improve flood resilience along Minnehaha Creek.

2-16 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 S

d W e

i l C

W 40th St S l n E 40th St

S i v

S S

a e a

S E 40 th St v S

V m e S

e e

A S

e S S S S

S e

S S

v v

S S

FLOOD MODELING AND MITIGATION v

v L e

e e e e

A e n B u

A A v

e e

v e e

i A

v v v v

e v b l

e t

v v n y

v v

r h A A A A e A

n d n

A A

A A r n r P u u

a k

o y r

e h e h h h

a u

k d a

t h h

t t t t t

l l

s h h

o l

n Q t t s w

t t

1 s i 0 2 3 4

i 4 5 r

1 6 0

1 1 1 1

l a P

H y a

1 2 d i

C i n

R P

P B l y N l a e W 41st St s W Lake Har w E 41st St ri W S e B t e E 41st St

S P kw s S

y S l e o

e 35W v

e n

R S

v § ¨¦ S

S S S

d S D v

e v

A e l

e i

A e

e e e

A e g l

STUDIES

v i

s v v v n v h

e A

A g

A A A A t

a x

i A

t t d A

r W h h h 4 d

2 d n s v r

t t t

d s

S n v e t e n

4 5 6

1 e

a 2 2 2 3 2 S

S S

E 42nd St E 42nd St

e e

v S v

A e

v v

n n

r A

u t n

b p a

MINNEHAHA CREEK FLOODPLAIN e

U d c i

s r

a i e

W h

S W 43rd St E 43rd St S E 43rd St e v

e 43rd S e

t w v

A o

h Figure 2.12 compares the current FEMA 1% chance floodplain boundary h e

f 2

g 7

n t

o h

W 4 L 4th St E 44th St Ave S E 44th St S

e v

v for Minnehaha Creek in blue and the projected change to the 1% chance v A

t n

0 2

3 3 W 45th St

S E 45th St Harriet W 45th St E 45th St

S 8 e

1 v

e y floodplain boundary for 2050 in orange. Current floodplain projections for the e 7 A v

v w

t A

A H

t n

t Hiawatha s

o n

g a

m r

s n

e i

e y r a

S K

F H

w P

k e

P W 46th St E 46th St v

t A year 2050 illustrate that the future floodplain boundary will likely mimic the S E 46th St 5 CSAH 46

i e 1 4

S r S

r M

8 1 4

A a e

g i 2

v v 8 n

H v s n

A i 2 n A

n d e e

h 1

m k e h t

v Crosby Pl 6 3 A a o

8 a

L e o h v

1 1 1

l 6 E a e

S 8 8

B present day 0.2% change floodplain boundary, which would represent a five- 1

W 47th St A S 2 W 47th St E 47th St 8 v

1 e

S 3 8 Ç

e Pkwy S y

1 e v fr

e 8 d

¾ 3 ¾ v 55 lvd o k G

1 B r ha o h 8 a

t d fold increase. These 2050 projections utilized a 25% increase in current rainfall Y a 7 aw 1 E Minnehaha Pkwy N W 4 M-2120 81 8th St S 8 M-1121 t E 48th St 7 S W 48th S

8 845 9

v 1

e 2 2

A 0 v 0

8 8

l 0

2 1 8

e 8 0

s e 8

s v e a W Rusti e A 0 s c depths. Lo g v d 8 wy 2

m u Pk 1 A is m o 2 8 R ko h o h N t 2 W

T 5

2 W 49th St 845 845 1

49th St E 49th St E W 3 4 9 h St

2 t 8

S M

e -2

v 4 2 Busch Ter 5

2 5

8 8

8 o

2 i

l G 82 2 8 9 l

l 8 8 W 50th St E a W 50th St E 2 E 50th St d 50th St s 4 S t

S o

e n

e v e

A A Keewaydin Pl

A t

n e 8 S 5

d a 6 h

4 l 2 2 t

g 0 2 e 8 5 4 5

i A o t ve S

f e c 8 E L 8 r Prosp 8

8 t 51st St 3 st S E G 1 Longview Ter E 5 6 3 t 4 l 0 P e t S wood 2

m S S W l 1 s 4 S E v

S 1 S 5 B 8

e A 8 w e e e lm oo e l d 3 e E E P

845 845 m 2

v v 8 v l v e 4 v 4 4 o r

A A

A 8 3 o

We A enonah Pl A m n r y

t lmwood Pl t 6 W E h h a 2 8 8

h t t

n A

5 6 a v e

l e 3 3

r y v

t 845

r o A

l C

e W 52nd St 845 C

l n A r l W Luve E 52nd St e 52nd St W 52nd St E 52nd St

8 s

2 Nokomis

2 3 s 1

8 M

4 6 u 3

4 4 8

4 - 8

R 4 4 1 4

8 8 0 F 7 or 0 e 8 stdale Rd 8 Valley View Pl 3 8 39 7 4 1 8 8 y

7 k 833 W 53rd St 3 37 P E 53rd St E 53rd St 8

S S

S t e r S a

v 8 S

A S l tt 8 C ra S P 0

e e e h S

S D S

S 850 845 e 3 820 y s h

0 v v a s S

5 6 v a w

837 e e

e v

e u e v R k A

A h

v e t 5

A e v

v e

8 v

v 837 v

r P A

t e

A i v Brookwood Te s s r A

8 a A

A i A n y n i

d Mondamin St 8 h

well Dr t h u h om 8 A Cr 45 l 820 t m t

n t o 8 6 d

s h g w 3 h

n i P o m 5 3 l

o s r k t 0 t 8 s k

d 3 1 p n

o o o 8 M r P

i b 1 3

3 9 8 7 0 n a N p k

e 5

4 4 m 3 v h 3 5 0 M E 2 a W S e r m i a u o n

r a I n h k

8 e

8 u 1 5 5 e a 5 D N H

G E L

4 v H

8 8 W 54th St E 54th St E A E E 54th St

S d

r g y e a

S e S

v w d w

e k e e

a v P v t C Ro o bbins St A e s A Boardman St

i 8 g r

h h 5 a B m t t o 5 c

0 l 9

i d v k

S R S 1 2

ke h d o nd La d o

e m

C a N S Di

v R v e

A W 55th St k A E 55th St

S E 5 d 5th St

v v

35W a

C y h n

§ L e ¨¦

a e l

d r v

S S S l

u v r W

n o

e A d

b S e e e

A e v

o t

w d

s v v v l

b 8

l t e w e

s l B

l v A A A m i 2

i e

n l m A 0 i h a n

P e

h h h

l o v

t n t t

c w e c i o B

W t i 1 C r 2 3 la

R 1

n 1 1 o

N d i o h l o S W 56th St C W E 56th St 82 E 56th St

S 0

S S

v v

e e

A A

v v

A A h

A n C A

t A

L s e a

i h

h d 6 t

s d S i d E 57th St t d t s t

d 1

m 6 a

a 5

e 4

2 1

o 2

v e 2 e s 2 r 2 k a l 2 e

t v Diamond A i A o T

l A W N v n 57th St e e

S l e s

s h

o a o t S

d v

n 3

y r E t

A n D L e S

s r r

i 5 i 7 v h e

1 th Ct e c e s A d C S S mi 3 t oko v

N i d n

h A s e

v d a

S A 9 t

1 m

d S 0 o i n 2

h St e E 58th St th S W 58 a l v T E 58th St 1st St

e k e

M A

v a v k

A r A O

e a s e g

v r u v P 2nd St

A e b

b S h

d r c

e u

w n

D l i v

e d o

S A s

i H

S r C

e A E 59th St

n n er W 59th St y e v ake La E 5 T 9th St t v u L

e 59th St W Military Hw t S e d v R y

A i

D e

A k

n T

a A r V v

K 9 e

u L o P

e A h

s v

Q t v s Roslyn Pl m d

i A

e a

a o m a R

r t

2 i P W 59th 1 e

/2 e O S o t c r G rvi 5th St D

e a v

n S s s h

Chester St w A i o st r 35W s r o o r a

¨¦§ l

C G

l E

o F town H 6th St ss w p r

E 60th St S S W 60th S o y t e r C A

m e G

Ç S i

S r A

a n e

e r v

n d ¾ t v ¾

S 121 A

A 8

A A

e t 2 Legend

e v

v v e

w n v e i Mother

A r

a S e A

S r

k N g S v

a Taft

r s

r e H A o o v e E 61st St Y Grass A n M m ve a o x A d t o J t LegalBoundary R g M n n S e n o o r K g i g p e a Ç Colfax E t

a La S m u

v n n C D 6 L o A t 35W 2 o ro o ¾ S ¾ § n r ¨¦ F l 77 s d e n S B e e S v t Dr Base Flood Elevations x Minneapolis Ç r A Minneapolis W 61st St W 62nd St st e E 62nd St

1 T RD 19 S

X ¾ PV ¾ 62 PVT RD 24 3

Richfield e Fort Snelling 2

S 8 2 v

S n

1 2

A d

e D

v D

v n R Projected 1% Chance Floodplain A R

d o

T t

S l

e h

e g e V

2015 Aerial Photograph (Source: Hennepin County) V S

v t

e e

a v n

P e

P i

A v e

v S

A S A

S A

1 i

A S

n t m

n r

S n

e f s e

r A

n o i l

o n e

a v W 63 v E 63rd St a rd St

e e

e o s v

o Current 1% Chance Floodplain

d Fort Snelling l

A v h A

i t

m s

d n

r S

h B p

s h n

o h

c i

s d

U e E h

k i

r 5 V

h 4

e v T field R Rich 3 P 20 S t V RD

o T

W A

R S

Y Dr h eet ed Legion t ± r 5 Municipal Boundary d Path: L:\0185\0084\Minneapolis\MXD\Flood Resilience.mxd il 1 Date: 11/20/20T1im8 e: 3:02:00 PMUser: KacHD0606 M Milner Pond MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOVEMBER 2018 Figure 2.11 Current and Projected 100-year Flood Hazard Zones Flood Resilience Figure 1

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-17 FLOOD MODELING OTT SW Harriet OWEN

SC GLENDALE CH The City of Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota are engaged in flood MORNINGSIDE MOTOR 44TH Existing modeling in order to track and predict flood-prone areas throughout the City. ZENITH Flood Extents ETON

Previous to starting the detailed modeling in 2014, the City could only track THOMAS 44TH BEARD flood problems through eyewitness accounts. The modeling provides an FRANCE 45TH objective and more thorough understanding of the extents of the potential Legend LAKE HARRIET problems. To date, the City is tracking over 150 flood-prone areas. DREW Pump SUNNYSIDE VINCENT Lake Harriet Stations WASHBURN Figure 2.13 is an example of the output from the modeling and identifies the 46TH 46TH areas and structures that are predicted to be impacted during heavy rainfall 10 Year Event YORK

Potentially CHOWEN Impacted MEADOW

events. It is representative of the problems throughout the city. Using this EWING Structures data, the City has started feasibility studies to better understand the reasons 100 Year 47TH 47TH 47TH 47TH Event 47TH

for the flooding in the specific areas and to investigate flood reduction ABBOTT Potentially strategies. It should be noted that the cause of localized flooding is due to a Impacted Structures BEARD variety of site-specific conditions relating to impervious surfaces, topography, MINNEHAHA

48TH 48TH 48TH HUMBOLDT and soil conditions, combined with higher volumes of surface runoff from 10 Year Event 48TH 48TH

Flood Extents UPTON WASHBURN heavy rainfall events. PARK 100 Year IRVING Event Flood ZENITH MORGAN Extents DP03 SOUTHWEST HARRIET FLOOD STUDY 49TH 49TH 49TH 49TH 10 Year Event The land between Lake Harriet and Minnehaha Creek is one of the areas Flooded Channel

49 1/2 XERXES

determined to be atrisk for flooding due to the aging and undersized storm Streets (>6") KNOX GIRARD 100 Year MINNEHAHA sewer pipes and the clay soil that limits the amount of infiltration. During 10- 50TH DP01

Event THOMAS and 100-year flood events, hundreds of structures, dozens of streets, and some Flooded QUEEN Streets (>6")

local parks are inundated. YORK DP16 NEWTON

Study Area OLIVER

51ST VINCENT

In order to develop solutions to flooding in this area, the City of Minneapolis 51ST 51ST

CHOWEN RUSSELL

partnered with MPRB and MCWD to produce the Southwest Harriet Flood SHERIDAN

PENN

HALIFAX WASHBURN

Mitigation Feasibility Study and Stormwater Master Plan. Released in July of GORGAS

BEARD

DREW

ABBOTT LOGAN 52ND 52ND

2018, this study overlapped with the Minnehaha Creek FEMA flood repair 52ND KNOX efforts and the beginning of the Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail Master Plan EWING

RUSSELL

process, which allowed for information from the study to inform this master UPTON

¯ JAMES plan, particularly near Lynnhurst Park. 0 350 700 IRVING 53RD RED CEDAR

Feet 53RD

MORGAN HUMBOLDT RUSSELL Through the study, it was determined that although most of the flooding was 1 inch = 700 feet BROOKWOOD CROMWELL GIRARD due to deficiencies in the City’s storm sewer system, some of the flooding was ZENITH

Minnehaha Creek FOREST DALE OLIVER

54TH NEWTON due to poor drainage internal to private properties and unrelated to the City’s 54TH PLOT: 3:09:22 PM 7/18/2018 BY: cduntem cduntem \\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2017\171151\Design\GIS\MXD\ReportMXDs\ExistingFlooding.mxd 3:09:22 PM FILE: BY: 7/18/2018 PLOT:

infrastructure. The study identified several potential solutions for flooding HRG Figure 2.12 Southwest Harriet Flood Study Mapping related to the City’s infrastructure including larger pipes and providing safe locations for rainwater to pond.

2-18 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE HISTORY Minneapolis began building its sewer network in the 1870s. This initial combined system discharged all stormwater runoff and wastewater to nearby water bodies. In 1906, the City proposed a large combined trunk sewer along the Minnehaha Creek corridor. Completed between 1921-1926, the pipe’s outfall into the Mississippi River was 126” in diameter. As the negative health and water quality impacts of these combined sewer overflows (CSOs) became apparent, the City started working to eliminate CSOs from its system. Until recently, one CSO into Minnehaha Creek remained. The former Minnehaha Trunk Sewer now serves as a Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptor that conveys wastewater to the wastewater treatment plant. While Minneapolis now has separate storm sewer and sanitary sewer systems, their infrastructure is aging. 80% of sanitary sewer pipes are more than 80 years old, and 50% of storm sewer pipes are more than 50 years old. Damaged, leaky, or undersized pipes can exacerbate problems like flooding, especially as extreme rainfall events become more common. Repair and replacement of this infrastructure is disruptive, and often makes the most sense when it occurs simultaneously with other projects. The partnership between the City of Minneapolis Public Works Department, MCWD, and MPRB allows infrastructure projects to be considered along with Parkway reconstruction, 1930s Construction of a Storm Tunnel Source: City of Minneapolis park and trail improvements, and Creek restoration projects in order to maximize overlapping benefits, optimize funding, and minimize disruption to neighborhoods.

Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Map 1906 Source: City of Minneapolis Figure 2.13 Age of Minneapolis Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure Source: City of Minneapolis

DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020 CREEK HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EVOLUTION 2-19 2014 Minnehaha Creek Flooding

2-20 MINNEHAHA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT JUNE 3, 2020