VPI Immingham OCGT Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

VPI Immingham OCGT Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Environmental Impact Assessment: Scoping Report VPI Immingham OCGT Proposed 299MW Open Cycle Gas Turbine (‘OCGT’) Power Station Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report June 2018 June 2018 Environmental Impact Assessment: Scoping Report DOCUMENT HISTORY Document Ref ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SCOPING REPORT Revision 0 Author Malcolm Sangster Signed MS Date 4.6.18 Approved By Richard Lowe Signed RL Date 4.6.18 Document Owner AECOM GLOSSARY Abbreviation Description ADMS Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty APFP Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedures AQMA Air Quality Management Area AQS Air Quality Strategy BIS Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (now closed) BS British Standard CAA Civil Aviation Authority CCR Carbon Capture Readiness CCS Carbon Capture and Storage CCGT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine CDM Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan CHP Combined Heat and Power CIEEM Chartered Institute for Ecology and Environmental Management CIfA Chartered Institute for Archaeologists CMS Construction Method Statement COPA Control of Pollution Act 1974 CRTN Calculation of Road Traffic Noise DCLG Department of Communities and Local Government DCO Development Consent Order DECC Department of Energy and Climate Change DMRB Design Manual for Roads and Bridges DTM Digital Terrain Model EH English Heritage EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMR Electricity Market Reform EPUK Environmental Protection UK ES Environmental Statement ESA Environmental Site Assessment FGD Flue Gas Desulphurisation FRA Flood Risk Assessment GCN Great Crested Newts HA Highways Agency HCA Homes and Communities Agency HE Historic England June 2018 Environmental Impact Assessment: Scoping Report Abbreviation Description HER Historic Environment Record HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle HHRA Human Health Risk Assessment IAQM Institute of Air Quality Management IDB Internal Drainage Board IED Industrial Emissions Directive IEEM Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management IEMA Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee LCA Landscape Character Assessment LLFA Lead Local Flood Authority LOR Lindsey Oil Refinery LSE Likely Significant Effects LVIA Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment LWS Local Wildlife Site MW Megawatts NAQS National Air Quality Strategy NCA National Landscape Character Area NG National Grid NLC North Lincolnshire Council NPPF National Planning Policy Framework NPS National Policy Statement NSIP Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project NTS Non-Technical Summary OCGT Open Cycle Gas Turbine OMH Open Mosaic Habitats on Previously Developed Land ONS Office for National Statistics PEI Preliminary Environmental Information PINS Planning Inspectorate PRoW Public Rights of Way RCA Regional Character Area RSPB Royal Society for the Protection of Birds SAC Special Area of Conservation SM Scheduled Monument SNCI Site of Nature Conservation Importance SPA Special Protection Area SPZ Source Protection Zone SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest SUDS Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems TA Transport Assessment TCPA Town and Country Planning Act WFD Water Framework Directive WHO World Health Organisation ZTV Zone of Theoretical Visibility June 2018 Environmental Impact Assessment: Scoping Report CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consenting Regime .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Objectives of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ............................................................. 4 2.1 The Proposed Development Site ......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 The Surrounding Area .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Residential Receptors .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Traffic and Transport ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Designated Nature Conservation Sites ................................................................................................ 6 2.6 Cultural Heritage .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.7 Surface Water ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.8 Geology & Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................... 10 2.9 Landscape .......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Construction ...................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Operation ........................................................................................................................................... 14 3.4 Decommissioning ............................................................................................................................... 14 4.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................. 16 4.1 Alternatives to the Proposed Development ...................................................................................... 16 4.2 Alternative Sites ................................................................................................................................. 16 4.3 Alternative Technologies ................................................................................................................... 16 5.0 PLANNING POLICY .......................................................................................................... 18 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 18 5.2 National Policy Statements ................................................................................................................ 18 5.3 Other matters that may be ‘Important and Relevant’ ....................................................................... 19 5.4 Local planning policy .......................................................................................................................... 20 5.5 The need for the Proposed Development ......................................................................................... 22 6.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES .................................................. 25 6.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 25 6.2 Air Quality .......................................................................................................................................... 25 6.3 Traffic and Transport ......................................................................................................................... 27 6.4 Noise and Vibration ........................................................................................................................... 28 6.5 Ecology and Nature Conservation ..................................................................................................... 31 6.6 Landscape and Visual Amenity .......................................................................................................... 34 6.7 Ground Conditions and Hydrogeology .............................................................................................. 35 6.8 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Drainage ............................................................................................ 37 6.9 Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................................ 38 6.10 Socio-Economics ................................................................................................................................ 43 6.11 Sustainability and Climate Change ..................................................................................................... 44 6.12 Cumulative and In-combination Effects ............................................................................................. 45 6.13 Combined Head and Power (CHP) Assessment ................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • VPI Immingham OCGT Project Combined Heat and Power
    VPI Immingham OCGT Project Document Ref: 5.9 PINS Ref: EN010097 The Immingham Open Cycle Gas Turbine Order Land to the north of and in the vicinity of the VPI Immingham Power Station, Rosper Road, South Killingholme, Lincolnshire, DN40 3DZ Combined Heat and Power Readiness Assessment The Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 - Regulation 5(2)(q) Applicant: VPI Immingham B Ltd Date: April 2019 Document Ref: 5.9 Combined Heat and Power Readiness Assessment DOCUMENT HISTORY Document Ref 5.9 Revision 0 Author Ross Taylor Signed RT Date April 2019 Approved By Richard Lowe Signed RL Date April 2019 Document Owner AECOM GLOSSARY Abbreviation Description BAT Best Available Techniques CBA Cost-benefit analysis CCGT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine CHP Combined Heat and Power CHPQA Combined Heat and Power CHP Quality Assurance CHP-R Combined Heat and Power -ready – DCO Development Consent Order DECC Department of Energy and Climate Change EA Environment Agency GT Gas Turbine HCA Homes and Communities Agency LEP Local Enterprise Partnerships MW megawatts MWth megawatts thermal NLC North Lincolnshire Council NSIP Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project OCGT Open Cycle Gas Turbine. PES Primary energy saving SoS The Secretary of State – April 2019 1 CONTENTS 1.0 COMBINED HEAT AND POWER ASSESSMENT ............................................ 3 2.0 POLICY CONTEXT AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................ 7 3.0 CHP ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster
    Delivering Cost Effective CCS in the 2020s – a Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster A CHATHAM HOUSE RULE MEETING REPORT July 2016 A CHATHAM HOUSE RULE MEETING REPORT Delivering Cost Effective CCS in the 2020s – Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster A group consisting of private sector companies, public sector bodies, and leading UK academics has been brought together by the UKCCSRC to identify and address actions that need to be taken in order to deliver a CCS based decarbonisation option for the UK in line with recommendations made by the Committee on Climate Change (i.e. 4-7GW of power CCS plus ~3MtCO2/yr of industry CCS by 2030). At an initial meeting (see https://ukccsrc.ac.uk/about/delivering-cost-effective-ccs-2020s-new-start) it was agreed that a series of regionally focussed meetings should take place, and Yorkshire Humber (which also naturally extended to possible links with Teesside) was the first such region to be addressed. Conclusions Reached No. Conclusion Conclusion 1.1 The existence within Yorkshire Humber of a number of brownfield locations with existing infrastructure and planning consents means that the region remains a likely UK CCS cluster region. Conclusion 1.2 Demise of coal fired power plants in the Aire Valley will see the loss of coal handling infrastructure and new handling facilities would need to be developed for biomass-based projects Conclusion 2.1 For Yorkshire Humber it is the choice of storage location that determines whether any pipeline infrastructure would route primarily north or south of the Humber. Conclusion 2.2 For Yorkshire Humber (and Teesside) there exist only 3 beach crossing points and two viable shipping locations for export of CO2 offshore (or for import, for transfer to storage).
    [Show full text]
  • VPI Immingham OCGT Project Explanatory Memorandum
    VPI Immingham OCGT Project Document Ref: 2.2 PINS Ref: EN010097 The Immingham Open Cycle Gas Turbine Order Land to the north of and in the vicinity of the VPI Immingham Power Station, Rosper Road, South Killingholme, Lincolnshire, DN40 3DZ Explanatory Memorandum The Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 - Regulation 5(2)(c) GX Applicant: VPI Immingham B Ltd Date: April 2019 Document Ref: 2.2 Explanatory Memorandum DOCUMENT HISTORY Document Ref 2.2 Revision 1 Author Abigail Sweeting Signed AS Date April 2019 Approved By Nick McDonald Signed NM Date April 2019 Document Owner Pinsent Masons LLP GLOSSARY Abbreviation Description PA 2008 The Planning Act 2008 which is the legislation in relation to applications for NSIPs, including pre-application consultation and publicity, the examination of applications and decision making by the Secretary of State. Access Work No. 2 – access works comprising access to the OCGT Power Station Site and access to Work Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 AGI Above Ground Installation – installations used to support the safe and efficient operation of the pipeline; above ground installations are needed at the start and end of a gas pipeline and at intervals along the route. APFP Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009. Sets out detailed procedures that must be followed for submitting and publicising applications for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects. Applicant VPI Immingham B Ltd or VPIB Application The Application for a Development Consent Order made to the Secretary of State under Section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 in respect of the Proposed Development, required pursuant to Section 31 of the Planning Act 2008 because the Proposed Development is a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project under Section 14(1)(a) and Section 15 of the Planning Act 2008 by virtue of being an onshore generating station in England of more than 50 Megawatts electrical capacity of more.
    [Show full text]
  • VPI Immingham OCGT Project Statement of Common Ground With
    VPI Immingham OCGT Project Document Ref: 8.7 PINS Ref: EN010097 The Immingham Open Cycle Gas Turbine Order Land to the north of and in the vicinity of the VPI Immingham Power Station, Rosper Road, South Killingholme, Lincolnshire, DN40 3DZ Statement of Common Ground with Historic England The Planning Act 2008 GX Applicant: VPI Immingham B Ltd Date: July 2019 Document Ref: 8.7 Statement of Common Ground with Historic England DOCUMENT HISTORY Document Ref 8.5 Revision 1.0 Author Malcolm Sangster (MS) Signed MS Date July 2019 Approved By Richard Lowe (RL) Signed RL Date July 2019 Document Owner AECOM GLOSSARY Abbreviation Description Access Work No. 2 – access works comprising access to the OCGT Power Station Site and access to Work Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6; Access Site The land required for Work No.2. AGI Above Ground Installation Applicant VPI Immingham B Ltd Application The Application for a Development Consent Order made to the Secretary of State under Section 37 of the Planning Act 2008. CHP Combined Heat and Power DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment Electrical Work No. 5 – an electrical connection of up to 400 kilovolts and Connection controls systems. Electrical The land required for Work No.5. Connection Site ES Environmental Statement Existing AGI The exiting AGI within the Existing VPI CHP Site. Existing AGI Site The land comprising the exiting AGI within the Existing VPI CHP Site. Existing Gas The land comprising the Existing Gas Pipeline and a stand-off either Pipeline Site side of it. Existing VPI CHP The existing VPI Immingham Power Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Load Grid Routes
    HEAVY LOAD GRID ROUTES Route Category Name 1 C Staffordshire (A500/A34) to Salford (A5063/Ponoma Docks) 2 C Rudheath (A50/B5082) to Birkenhead (Docks) 2A C Lostock Gralam (A556/Manchester Rd R2/2) to M53(12) (Hoole Village R2/6) 3 B Liverpool (M57/A580) to Liverpool (Docks) 6 F Newcastle upon Tyne (A1, Tyne Bridge) to M1 (M1(J19)/M6) 6A C A1/B6267 (Ainderby Quernhow R6/7) to A1/A61 (Baldersby St James R6/7) 8A B Chingford (A110/B160 R8/31) to A406/B179 (Waltham Forest R8/36) 10A D Avonmouth (Docks(St Andrews Gates)) to Gloucester (A40/A417) 10B D Avonmouth (Docks(West Gate)) to Avonmouth (M49) 10 E Stafford (A34/Riverway) to Gloucester (A449/A38) 13 B A1 (A63/A1) to Monk Fryston (A63/Fryston Common La) 14 B Ferrybridge (A162/A1) to Ferrybridge (Power Station) 16 D A1 (A1/B1220) to Thorpe in Balne (Thorpe Bank/Thorpe La) 17 B A1 (A1/A614) to M180 (J1) 18 F A1(M) (A1(M)/M18) to Eggborough (Power Station) 19 B A1/A57 (Markham Moor) to Cottam (Power Station) 20 F A1 (B1164/A1) to High Marham (Power Station) 22 A Folkestone (Folkestone Harbour) to Dungeness (Nuclear Power Station) 24A B Aldershot (A323/A331 R24/3) to Farnham (A31/A287) 24B B Ripley (A3/B2039) to Upper Hale (A325/A3016) 27A F Mangotsfield (A432/A4174 R27/6) to Pennsylvania (A420/A46 R27/8) 29 C Backford (A5117/A41) to Ince (Substation) 30 E Backford (A5117/A41) to Ellesmere Port (Queen Elizabeth Docks) 32I D Darlington (A167/Whessoe Rd) to Middlesborough (Docks) 32C D Middlesbrough (A172/A1085 R32B/13) to Redcar and Cleveland (Lackenby Docks) 32B D Darlington (A167/Whessoe
    [Show full text]
  • VPI Immingham OCGT Project Statement of Common Ground with National Grid
    VPI Immingham OCGT Project Document Ref: 8.5 PINS Ref: EN010097 The Immingham Open Cycle Gas Turbine Order Land to the north of and in the vicinity of the VPI Immingham Power Station, Rosper Road, South Killingholme, Lincolnshire, DN40 3DZ Statement of Common Ground with National Grid The Planning Act 2008 GX Applicant: VPI Immingham B Ltd Date: September 2019 Document Ref: 8.5 Statement of Common Ground with National Grid DOCUMENT HISTORY Document Ref 8.5 Revision 1.0 Author Nick McDonald Signed Date Approved By Nick McDonald Signed Date Document Owner Pinsent Masons LLP GLOSSARY Abbreviation Description Access Work No. 2 – access works comprising access to the OCGT Power Station Site and access to Work Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6; Access Site The land required for Work No.2. AGI Above Ground Installation – installations used to support the safe and efficient operation of the pipeline; above ground installations are needed at the start and end of a gas pipeline and at intervals along the route. AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty APFP The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Regulations Procedures) Regulations 2009 Applicant VPI Immingham B Ltd Application The Application for a Development Consent Order made to the Secretary of State under Section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 in respect of the Proposed Development, required pursuant to Section 31 of the Planning Act 2008 because the Proposed Development is a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project under Section 14(1)(a) and Section 15 of the Planning Act 2008 by virtue of being an onshore generating station in England of more than 50 Megawatts electrical capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatfield & Stainforth Disruption
    Hatfield & Stainforth Disruption Map Bradford Interchange LEEDS SELBY Wressle Eastrington Broomfleet Ferriby HULL Howden Gilberdyke Brough Hessle SELBY POTTER GROUP FERRYBRIDGE EGGBOROUGH POWER STATION New Holland POWER STATION DRAX POWER STATION BARTON-ON-HUMBER GOOLE Barrow New Holland Docks Outwood Knottingley Hensall Snaith Haven Goxhill KILLINGHOLME Wakefield Westgate IMMINGHAM DOCKS (APB) Whitley Rawcliffe Pontefract Bridge Sandall & Agbrigg Baghill Thornton Abbey GRIMSBY DOCKS Fitzwilliam COLLIERY Ulceby LANDSLIP Roxby Landfill site AREA Thorne Moorthorpe North Thorne South Crowle SCUNTHORPE Barnetby Healing Habrough HATFIELD COLLIERY Althorpe Great Coates Thurnscoe Grimsby Town New Clee TATA Stallingborough Grimsby Docks HATFIELD & STAINFORTH SCUNTHORPE Kirk Sandall LNE North route Goldthorpe CLEETHORPES DONCASTER Brigg Bolton- upon-Dearne Conisbrough Kirton Lindsey Swinton Mexborough Market Rasen Gainsborough Central Trent Jcns ROTHERHAM WEST CENTRAL Harworth BURTON Gainsborough branch POWER Lea Road Stocksbridge branch STATION COTTAM POWER RETFORD Maltby STATION Saxilby Meadowhall OTOKUMPU TINSLEY Kiveton Darnall Bridge LINCOLN CENTRAL Woodburn Jcn Worksop High Woodhouse Kiveton Shireoaks Marnham Edale Hope Park SHEFFIELD To Manchester Whitwell Hykeham Metheringham EARLES Thorpe SIDINGS Dore & Totley Wainfleet Creswell Swinderby Culvert Havenhouse Bamford Wellbeck Colliery Collingham SKEGNESS Hathersage Langwith Thoresby Grindleford Ruskington Hall Lane Whaley Thorns Oxcroft Newark Newark North Gate Dronfield Bolsover Mansfield
    [Show full text]
  • North Doncaster Chord Repository Version.Pdf
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch The impacts on freight train operational performance of new rail infrastructure to segregate passenger and freight traffic Woodburn, A.G. NOTICE: this is the authors’ version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Transport Geography. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 176-185, 2017. The final definitive version in Journal of Transport Geography is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.006 © 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] The impacts on freight train operational performance of new rail infrastructure to segregate passenger and freight traffic Allan Woodburn Planning & Transport Department, University of Westminster, 35 Marylebone Road, London, NW1 5LS, United Kingdom Abstract Rail freight has an important role to play in improving the resource efficiency and sustainability of freight transport within the supply chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal by Rail: Historic Trends and Transhipment Modelling Preliminaries
    Coal by Rail: Historic Trends and Transhipment Modelling Preliminaries MRes in Railway Systems Integration College of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering University of Birmingham Coal by Rail: Historic Trends and Transhipment Modelling Author - Carl Brewer Supervisor – Dr Andrew Tobias Carl Brewer i University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Coal by Rail: Historic Trends and Transhipment Modelling Preliminaries Executive Summary This paper presents a detailed account of the historic trends of coal transportation by rail in Great Britain over the last 50 years. The Re-shaping Britain’s Railways report by the British Railways Board in 1963 highlighted increasing inefficiencies of freight transportation by rail, and consequently established the Merry-Go-Round (MGR) system at both coal terminals and coal pits, to improve speed and performance so rail would be able to effectively compete with road haulage for the transportation for freight (Jones, 2012). Most recently, coal is increasingly imported to the UK to coastal ports from Europe and the rest of the World. As a consequence the movement of trains on the network combined with new coal locations have changed the distances and destinations of coal trains compared with before the report in 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Installations.Docx
    UK Installations: for submission into the main EU ETS System Installation ID Operator Name Installation Name DTI0200 Centrica Storage Limited Rough 47/3B DTI0300 EnQuest Heather Limited Kittiwake Alpha DTI0400 Apache North Sea Limited Forties Alpha DTI0600 Apache North Sea Limited Forties Charlie DTI0700 Apache North Sea Limited Forties Delta DTI1000 ConocoPhillips (UK) Britannia Limited Britannia DTI1001 Chrysaor Limited Lomond DTI1002 Chrysaor Limited Everest North DTI1004 Total E&P North Sea UK Limited Ailsa FSO DTI1005 Total E&P North Sea UK Limited Culzean DTI1006 Hurricane Energy PLC Aoka Mizu DTI1007 ONE-DYAS UK Limited Sean DTI1008 Serica Energy (UK) Limited Bruce DTI1009 EnQuest Heather Limited Magnus DTI1010 Spirit Energy North Sea Oil Limited Sevan Hummingbird FPSO DTI1011 Perenco UK Limited Trent Compression Facilities DTI1013 EnQuest Heather Limited Northern Producer Floating Production Facility DTI1014 Neptune E&P UK Limited Cygnus Alpha Platform DTI1015 Premier Oil E&P UK Limited Voyager Spirit FPSO DTI1200 Spirit Energy Production UK Limited Morecambe Central Processing Complex DTI1300 Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited Triton FPSO DTI1600 Apache Beryl I Limited Beryl Alpha DTI1700 Apache Beryl I Limited Beryl Bravo DTI1900 Perenco UK Limited Indefatigable 23A DTI2000 Perenco UK Limited Leman 27A DTI2100 Chevron North Sea Limited Captain FPSO DTI2200 Chevron North Sea Limited Alba Northern Platform (ANP) DTI2300 Chevron North Sea Limited Alba FSU DTI2600 Eni Hewett Limited Hewett 48/29A DTI2700 Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Limited
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    Moving Forward Together Annual Report and Accounts 2012 Hargreaves Services plc Hargreaves Annual Report and Accounts 2012 Review of the Year An Overview of the Group Established in 1994, Hargreaves Services plc provides unrivalled performance in sourcing, producing, processing, handling and transporting carbon-based and other bulk materials throughout the UK and within Europe. The Group has four complementary divisions: Production Energy & Commodities Produces coal and coke and also recycles Provides coal, coke, minerals, smokeless tyres for customers throughout the UK fuel and biomass products to a range of and Europe. industrial, wholesale and public sector energy consumers. Revenue Underlying Operating Profit Revenue Underlying Operating Profit £134.9m £15.2m £446.2m £30.4m +22.5% +20.3% +34.9% +17.3% The Production Division results for the year ended 31 May 2012 The Energy & Commodities Division had another very strong year. encompassed the operations at Maltby Colliery, Monckton Coke Works, Gross revenues increased by £115.4m to £446.2m, reflecting increases in MRT, Rocpower and our share of the Tower Regeneration Joint Venture. sales of coal to power station customers. An increase in the proportion Gross revenues for the Division increased by £24.8m from £110.1m to of lower margin power station coal relative to the higher margin speciality £134.9m and underlying operating profit by £2.5m from £12.7m to £15.2m. product saw overall operating profit margin reduce from 7.8% to 6.8%. As anticipated, the Division delivered a very strong second half performance However, underlying operating profit increased from £25.9m to £30.4m aided by the steady production rates and thicker coal on the T15 panel at driven largely by the strong power station volumes and margins in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • VPI Immingham OCGT Project the Applicant's Response to the Local
    VPI Immingham OCGT Project Document Ref: 7.7 PINS Ref: EN010097 The Immingham Open Cycle Gas Turbine Order Land at and in the vicinity of the existing VPI Immingham Power Station, South Killingholme, North Lincolnshire, DN40 3DZ The Applicant’s Response to the Local Impact Reports Examination Deadline 3 GX Applicant: VPI Immingham B Ltd Date: October 2019 Document Ref: 7.7 Applicant’s Comments on the Local Impact Reports DOCUMENT HISTORY Document Ref 7.7 Revision 1.0 Author Clara Rands (CR) Signed CR Date 10.10.19 Approved By Jake Barnes-Gott (JBG) Signed JBG Date 10.10.19 Document Owner DWD GLOSSARY Abbreviation Description Abbreviation Description Access Work No. 2 – access works comprising access to the OCGT Power Station Site and access to Work Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6; Access Site The land required for Work No.2. AGI Above Ground Installation – installations used to support the safe and efficient operation of the pipeline; above ground installations are needed at the start and end of a gas pipeline and at intervals along the route. Applicant VPI Immingham B Ltd Application The Application for a Development Consent Order made to the Secretary of State under Section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 in respect of the Proposed Development, required pursuant to Section 31 of the Planning Act 2008 because the Proposed Development is a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project under Section 14(1)(a) and Section 15 of the Planning Act 2008 by virtue of being an onshore generating station in England of more than 50 Megawatts electrical capacity.
    [Show full text]