DOCSLIB.ORG

A History of the "New Math" Movement in the United States Robert W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A History of the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1981 A history of the "new math" movement in the United States Robert W. Hayden Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Hayden, Robert W., "A history of the "new math" movement in the United States " (1981). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 7427. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/7427 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print, in all cases we have filmed the best available copy. Universi^ Micidnlms intematkxial 300 N /fct H RD , ANN AHBOH, Ml 48106 8209127 Hayden, Robert W. A HISTORY OF THE "NEW MATH" MOVEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES Iowa State University PH.D. 1981 University Microfilms Intern&tionâl 300N.ZMbRœd.AmDA**.MI4M06 Copyright 1981 by Hayden, RolDert W. All Rights Reserved A history of the "new math" movement In the United States by Robert W. Hayden A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Departments: Mathematics Professional Studies Co-majors: Mathematics Education Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Signature was redacted for privacy. he Major Departments Signature was redacted for privacy. For the Gr Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 1981 Copyright Robert W. Hayden, 1981. All rights reserved. il TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PREFACE 1 II. THE MATHEMATICAL BACKGROUND OF THE "NEW MATH" 5 A. Introduction S B. The Foundations of Geometry and the Reformation of Analysis 7 C. The Development of Set Theory 17 D. Non-Euclidean Geometry 20 E. Modem Abstract Algebra 24 F. The Spread of Modern Mathematics 27 G. The Impact ' Modern Mathematics 36 H. Conclusion 45 III. EDUCATIONAL REFORM PRIOR TO THE "NEW MATH" 47 IV. THE SECOND WORLD WAR AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION 72 A. The Importance of Mathematics to Society 72 B. New Uses for Mathematics 74 C. The Impact of the War on Applied Mathematics 76 D. The Impact of the War on Society's Support of Mathematics 80 E. The Impact of the War on School Mathematics 83 F. The Impact of the War on College Mathematics 87 V. SECONDARY SCHOOL "NEW MATH" 100 A. The University of Illinois Committee on School Mathematics (UlCSM) 100 B. The University of Maryland Mathematics Project (UMMaP) 107 C. The Commission on Mathematics of the College Entrance Examination Board (CEEB) 109 D. Sputnik 116 E. The School Mathematics Study Group (SMSG) 120 F. Other Programs 139 G. Dissemination 143 H. Reaction 157 VI. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL "NEW MATH" 173 A. The Problem of Teacher Training 173 B. The Early Elementary School "New Math" Programs 176 C. Training Teachers to Teach the "New Math" 190 Hi D. Dissemination 202 E. The Conflict Between Elementary School "New Math" and the Progressive Tradition in Education 207 F. The Neo-progressives 222 VII. CONCLUSION 235 VIII. REFERENCES 246 IX. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 270 iv LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1, Topics covered in "new oath" college textbooks 95 Table 2. Comparison of two eleventh grade "new math" texts 138 Table 3. Elementary school "new math" textbook series 187 Table 4. NSF summer institutes for elementary school personnel (as announced in The American Mathe­ matical Monthly (1959-1960) and The Arithmetic Teacher (1961-1965)) 191 Table 5. Articles on geometry in The Arithmetic Teacher during selected five year periods 192 Table 6. Semester hours of mathematics required of future elementary school teachers in 1962 and 1966 194 Table 7. Popular magazine articles on elementary school "new math" 203 V LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Diagonal of a square 10 Figure 2. Euclid's fifth postulate 23 Figure 3. Growth In NCTM memberships during "new math" era 147 Figure 4. NSF expenditures on developing course content 149 1 I. PREFACE The 19508 and 19608 8aw a major upheaval In the content and viewpoint of school mathematics. The changes that took place during those years were part of a coherent movement to reform mathematics education. The various reforms advocated by the leaders of this movement became known collectively as the "new math." The present work is a history of the "new math" movement in the United States. This movement brought about change in the school mathematics curriculum on a scale and at a rate unknown before—or since. The 1970s and 1980s have seen a drift in the opposite direction. For example, there have been demands to go "back to the basics." While it is not always clear what is basic, such demands clearly challenge recent reforms and call for a return to a more traditional curriculum. Unfortunately, such reaction against the "new math" has often caused us to lose sight of its entirely valid criticisms of "old math." What is needed is not to go back, but to go forward more wisely. Part of that wisdom can come from examining the history of the "new math." The "new math" did more than simply criticize the old. It also provided answers to some of the problems of mathematics education. It did not answer every question, nor was every question that it answered answered correctly, but it did give some answers. These answers can be relevant to the educational problems of today. 2 For example, while writing this history, the author was teaching a remedial college mathematics course in beginning algebra. The chosen text was written as if the "new math" had never existed. A successful effort was made to have the text changed the next time the course was offered. The new text had as one of its coauthors a leader in the "new math" movement. The new text was not a "new math" book, but its authors had learned from the "new math," and what they learned made theirs a much better text. One of the purposes of this history is to prevent the lessons learned in the "new math" experience from being lost. Another purpose is to keep alive an awareness of basic issues in mathematics education that were raised by the "new math." There have been no previous attempts to write a history of the "new math." It is true that many articles, pamphlets, and books explaining "new math" appeared during the 1960s. These often contained a sketch of the historical background of the movement. However, none of these sketches pretended to be serious scholarly studies. They represented instead the Impressions of those involved in the movement in the nature of its roots. The one serious scholarly work that treats the "new math" is the Thirty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, A History of Mathematics Education in the United States and Canada (1970). Although this work is well-documented, it naturally only gives a part of its attention to the "new math." In addition, it puts too much emphasis on what was said about mathematics 3 education, by various experts and commissions, and too little emphasis on what was done. A final earlier work relevant to the present study is a history of the largest "new math" group written by one of its members (Wooton, 1965). While invaluable in its own area, the book is far too narrow to give an adequate appreciation of the entire movement and its origins. In writing the present work, an attempt has been made to make it as useful as possible. This attempt has influenced the final work in two main ways.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Primer on America's Schools
    chapter 9 Standards and Accountability Williamson M. Evers The idea seems simple enough. Set standards for what students should be learning, and then hold them and their teachers account- able for seeing that the learning actually takes place. So why, then, after years of various benchmarks and commissions and legislative agendas, are the standards and accountability programs in this country all too often mediocre and ineffective? Because they are the product of politics. Standards and accountability, like most of the contentious issues concerning public schools today, are caught between powerful and conflicting political forces—forces that hold sway even in the face of a clear and widespread desire to improve the public education that 89 percent of this nation’s children re- ceive. In the specific case of standards and accountability, two forces in particular are at play: resistance from the teachers’ unions and the rest of the education establishment (which includes school boards, The author wishes to thank Mychele Brickner, Beth Ann Bryan, Paul Clopton, Ralph Cohen, Maureen DiMarco, Michelle Easton, Eric Hanushek, David Klein, Bill Lucia, Doug McRae, Stan Metzenberg, James Milgram, Terry Moe, Janet Nicholas, Sandra Stotsky, Abigail Thernstrom, Kate Walsh, Darv Winick, and Ze’ev Wurman for reading earlier drafts of this paper, in whole or in part, and offering valuable suggestions. He also wishes to thank Kate Feinstein for her help with research and editing and Peggy Dooley for extensive help with editing and revising. 205 .......................... 8774$$ $CH9 09-10-01 10:08:06 PS 206 Williamson M. Evers superintendents, and principals) who often want to avoid being evaluated when it comes to whether their students are learning; and struggles between the progressive and traditionalist schools of thought as to what educational standards should look like, and, indeed, whether there should be any standards at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2: Arithmetic
    E-320: Teaching Math with a Historical Perspective Oliver Knill, 2010-2017 Lecture 2: Arithmetic The oldest mathematical discipline is arithmetic. It is the theory of the construction and manip- ulation of numbers. The earliest steps were done by Babylonian, Egyptian, Chinese, Indian and Greek thinkers. Building up the number system starts with the natural numbers 1; 2; 3; 4::: which can be added and multiplied. Addition is natural: join 3 sticks to 5 sticks to get 8 sticks. Multiplication ∗ is more subtle: 3 ∗ 4 means to take 3 copies of 4 and get 4 + 4 + 4 = 12 while 4 ∗ 3 means to take 4 copies of 3 to get 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12. The first factor counts the number of operations while the second factor counts the objects. To motivate 3 ∗ 4 = 4 ∗ 3, spacial insight motivates to arrange the 12 objects in a rectangle. This commutativity axiom will be carried over to larger number systems. Realizing an addition and multiplicative structure on the natural numbers requires to define 0 and 1. It leads naturally to more general numbers. There are two major motivations to to build new numbers: we want to 1. invert operations and still get results. 2. solve equations. To find an additive inverse of 3 means solving x + 3 = 0. The answer is a negative number. To solve x ∗ 3 = 1, we get to a rational number x = 1=3. To solve x2 = 2 one need to escape to real numbers. To solve x2 = −2 requires complex numbers. Numbers Operation to complete Examples of equations to solve Natural numbers addition and multiplication 5 + x = 9 Positive fractions addition and
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Theorems in Mathematics
    SOME FUNDAMENTAL THEOREMS IN MATHEMATICS OLIVER KNILL Abstract. An expository hitchhikers guide to some theorems in mathematics. Criteria for the current list of 243 theorems are whether the result can be formulated elegantly, whether it is beautiful or useful and whether it could serve as a guide [6] without leading to panic. The order is not a ranking but ordered along a time-line when things were writ- ten down. Since [556] stated “a mathematical theorem only becomes beautiful if presented as a crown jewel within a context" we try sometimes to give some context. Of course, any such list of theorems is a matter of personal preferences, taste and limitations. The num- ber of theorems is arbitrary, the initial obvious goal was 42 but that number got eventually surpassed as it is hard to stop, once started. As a compensation, there are 42 “tweetable" theorems with included proofs. More comments on the choice of the theorems is included in an epilogue. For literature on general mathematics, see [193, 189, 29, 235, 254, 619, 412, 138], for history [217, 625, 376, 73, 46, 208, 379, 365, 690, 113, 618, 79, 259, 341], for popular, beautiful or elegant things [12, 529, 201, 182, 17, 672, 673, 44, 204, 190, 245, 446, 616, 303, 201, 2, 127, 146, 128, 502, 261, 172]. For comprehensive overviews in large parts of math- ematics, [74, 165, 166, 51, 593] or predictions on developments [47]. For reflections about mathematics in general [145, 455, 45, 306, 439, 99, 561]. Encyclopedic source examples are [188, 705, 670, 102, 192, 152, 221, 191, 111, 635].
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT POWELL, ETHEL ANNE. Ghosts of Chances for Redemption
    ABSTRACT POWELL, ETHEL ANNE. Ghosts of Chances for Redemption via Abjection in Wilson Harris’s Palace of the Peacock and Others. (Under the direction of Deborah Wyrick.) This thesis explores, in three works of literature, possibilities for redemption via abjection. Julia Kristeva’s semanalysis is the primary theoretical tool with which Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko (1688) is examined as a nascent work in Caribbean literature. Next, and central to this thesis, the Guyanese Wilson Harris’s The Palace of the Peacock (1960) is discussed within Kristevan context and within Caribbeanist literary critical context. Mariella, a central and fluid character in Palace, acts as a semiotic agent of destruction and of abjectly sublime redemption for Donne and his crew of river boatmen in pursuit of Other ethnically mixed peoples in Guyana’s interior. Donne’s moment of epiphany, wherein he comes to understand how inhumanely he has treated Others, is followed by his “second” death and rebirth in a celestial palace (along with the rest of the crew), marking his and their transformation from abject slavers to abjectly sublime and redeemed beings. The semiotic linguistic characteristics of Palace are investigated: while written in the style of Magical Realism, Palace contains lexical and dialectal features stemming from African and Amerindian influences. Flannery O’Connor’s “Revelation” (1965) is the final work examined. Via legacies of plantation slavery and ensuing discrimination against freed African-Americans, many works of Southern U.S. literature contain qualities of postcolonial literatures, particularly the element of abject Otherness. In “Revelation” Mrs. Ruby Turpin’s ideas about abject Others are transformed, as she is transformed from an abject avatar of white Southern racism and classism, into an abjectly sublime person who receives a “revelation” of her wrongs righted in a celestial march of all human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Greek Mathematics
    Cambridge Library Co ll e C t i o n Books of enduring scholarly value Classics From the Renaissance to the nineteenth century, Latin and Greek were compulsory subjects in almost all European universities, and most early modern scholars published their research and conducted international correspondence in Latin. Latin had continued in use in Western Europe long after the fall of the Roman empire as the lingua franca of the educated classes and of law, diplomacy, religion and university teaching. The flight of Greek scholars to the West after the fall of Constantinople in 1453 gave impetus to the study of ancient Greek literature and the Greek New Testament. Eventually, just as nineteenth-century reforms of university curricula were beginning to erode this ascendancy, developments in textual criticism and linguistic analysis, and new ways of studying ancient societies, especially archaeology, led to renewed enthusiasm for the Classics. This collection offers works of criticism, interpretation and synthesis by the outstanding scholars of the nineteenth century. A Short History of Greek Mathematics James Gow’s Short History of Greek Mathematics (1884) provided the first full account of the subject available in English, and it today remains a clear and thorough guide to early arithmetic and geometry. Beginning with the origins of the numerical system and proceeding through the theorems of Pythagoras, Euclid, Archimedes and many others, the Short History offers in-depth analysis and useful translations of individual texts as well as a broad historical overview of the development of mathematics. Parts I and II concern Greek arithmetic, including the origin of alphabetic numerals and the nomenclature for operations; Part III constitutes a complete history of Greek geometry, from its earliest precursors in Egypt and Babylon through to the innovations of the Ionic, Sophistic, and Academic schools and their followers.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry Terms That Start with K
    Geometry Terms That Start With K Dorian remains pokier after Stavros chafe hiddenly or bewitches any cudweed. Completive and microcosmical Georges still trade-in his somebodies enough. Austin reflect ingratiatingly? Maximize time to share with geometry and more lines, research has one that by a surface polygons that have predictable similarities and Record all that start with k on interactive whiteboards or whole number ideas about our extensive math terms that can extend any time or. Geometry Pdf. Table K-1 highlights the content emphases at the cluster level watching the. Theses items are very inexpensive and necessities for Geometry Homework so elect will. Numbers objects words or mathematical language acting out the situation making your chart. Geometry National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Drawing standardsindd The University of Memphis. The term or sometimes restricted to grain the socket of algebraic geometry and commutative algebra in statistics. The cross products. Begincases operatorname lVoverlineu1ldots overlineukoverlinev1ldots. Pre-K2 Expectations In pre-K through grade 2 each award every student should. Start to identify shapes they develop a beginning understanding of geometry. This where is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy first and literate of time apply Geometry Geeks. In words Ab Kmil's book begins with plain brief explanation of the standard. Mathcom Glossary. In Euclidean geometric terms one of the below would be the best. K Cool math com Online Math Dictionary. Top 5 Things to an About Teaching Geometry in 3rd Grade. Start studying Math nation geometry section 1 vocab math nation geometry. Your web page jump to terms come across any geometry term.
    [Show full text]
  • Math Wars: the Politics of Curriculum
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Presidential Scholars Theses (1990 – 2006) Honors Program 1999 Math wars: The politics of curriculum Raymond Johnson University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1999 Raymond Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pst Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Raymond, "Math wars: The politics of curriculum" (1999). Presidential Scholars Theses (1990 – 2006). 89. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pst/89 This Open Access Presidential Scholars Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presidential Scholars Theses (1990 – 2006) by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MATH WARS The Politics of Curriculum Presidential Scholars Senior Thesis by Raymond Johnson Under the advisement of Dr. Edward Rathmell December 9, 1999 Johnson 2 Introduction There is an ongoing battle in mathematics education, a battle sometimes so fierce that some people call it the "math wars". Americans have seen many changes and proposed changes in their educational system in the last fifty years, but few have stirred such debate, publicity, and criticism as have the changes in mathematics education. We will first look at the history of the math wars and take time to examine previous attempts to change mathematics education in America. Second, we will assess the more recent efforts in mathematics education reform . Lastly, we will make some predictions for the future of the math wars and the new directions mathematics education may take.
    [Show full text]
  • Victims of the Mccarthy Era, in Support of Humanitarian Law Project, Et Al
    Nos. 08-1498 and 09-89 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Petitioners, v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, ET AL., Respondents. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, ET AL., Cross-Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Respondents. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE VICTIMS OF THE MCCARTHY ERA, IN SUPPORT OF HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, ET AL. Stephen F. Rohde John A. Freedman Rohde & Victoroff (Counsel of Record) 1880 Century Park East Jonathan S. Martel Suite 411 Jeremy C. Karpatkin Los Angeles, CA 90067 Bassel C. Korkor (310) 277-1482 Sara K. Pildis ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 555 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 942-5000 Attorneys for Amici Curiae - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 4 I. Americans Paid a Heavy Price For McCarthy Era Penalties on Speech and Association ............................................................ 4 II. The Supreme Court in the 1950s and 1960s Rejected McCarthy Era ‗Guilt by Association‘ Statutes as Impermissible ............... 9 A. AEDPA Penalizes the Relationship Between an Individual and a Designated Organization, in Violation of the Freedom of Association ................................................... 10 1. Congress Cannot Impose a ―Blanket Prohibition‖ on Association With Groups Having Legal and Illegal Aims .......................... 10 2. The Government Must Prove that Individuals Intend to Further the Illegal Aims of an Organization.......................................... 12 - ii - B. Like McCarthy Era Statutes, AEDPA Makes Constitutionally Protected Speech a Crime and is Unconstitutionally Vague, Chilling Free Speech .................................................. 14 1. AEDPA Unconstitutionally Penalizes Protected Speech in the Same Manner as McCarthy Era Laws ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Spirals and Fibonacci Numbers: a Mathematical Gold Mine Irving
    Plant Spirals and Fibonacci Numbers: A Mathematical Gold Mine Irving Adler* North Bennington, Vt. 05257 Counting the spirals on a pineapple, pine cone, or sunflower opens the door to the fascinating Fibonacci numbers and a host of mathematical concepts, with some suitable for every grade level. Dedicated to the Memory of ELLEN SPARER BINDMAN 1939 -- 1975 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics New York City Meeting December 30, 1975 * Dr Irving Adler (born 1913) is a well known American educator and author. He received his Ph.D. from Columbia University and has taught in New York City high schools, Columbia University and Bennington College, Vermont. He became a free lance author in 1954 and has received awards for his science books for children. He has also contributed to mathematical biology with his papers on models of phyllotaxis and of pre-biotic chemical evolution. 29 I. Plant Spirals and the Fibonacci Sequence On a sunflower, pineapple, pine cone, artichoke, and, in general, on the growing tip of a stem, there are conspicuous spirals, some going up to the right, sorne.going up to the left. Count them. Here are some usual counts: Tamarack 3, 5 Large Pineapple 13, 21 Pine Cone 5,8 Sunflower 21,34 Pineapple 8, 13 Giant Sunflower 34,55 These numbers, in order of magnitude, are consecutive terms of the Fibonacci sequence, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, ... If the n'th term is designated Fn, the sequence is generated by these conditions: initial values: F 1 = 1, F2 = 1. + , recurrence relation: Fn 1 = Fn + Fn- 1 n ~ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Algebra in S Hool
    Algebra d Igebraic Thinkin in S hool Math m ti s Seventi h Yearbook Carole E. Greelles Seventieth Yearbook Editor Arizona State University Mesa, Arizona Rheta Rubenstein General Yearbook E'ditor University o.f ]I/fichigan-Dearborn Dearborn, Michigan NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS 1 istory of Algebra in th Scho I urriculum Jeremy Kilpatrick Andrew Izsak flthere is a heaven/or school subjects, algebra H)ill never go there. It is the one subject in the curricuhul1 that has kept children .Ironz finishing high school, /j~onl developing their special interests' and /;~07n enjoying rnuch of their h0711e study work. It has caused 1110re jCllnily ro"Vvs, ,nore tears, 7110re heartaches, and nzore sleeples5' nights than any other school sul~ject. -Anonynlous editorial writer [ca. 1936J N THE United States and Canada before 1700, algebra was absent not only fronl I the school curriculu1l1 but also fro111 the CUITicululll of the early colleges and sCIllinaries. That situation changed during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as colleges and universities across North Anlerica began to offer courses in alge­ bra. In January 1751, when Benjanlin Franklin's acade111Y was established, the new master Theophilus Grew offered "Writing, Arithnletic, Merchants Accounts, Alge­ bra, AstTon0111Y, Navigation, and all other branches of Mathenlatics" (Overn 193 p. 373), and "algebra to quadratics" continued to be pali of the freshnlan curricululll after the acaden1Y becanle the University of Pennsylvania in 1779. Algebrcl is first nlentioned as being in the Harvard curriculunl in 1786 but was probably taught 111LlCh earlier, perhaps as early as 1 (Cajori 1890, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of New Math on Today's Curricula
    The Legacy of New Math on Today’s Curricula Melissa Scranton, Ph.D. Purdue University Global New Math of the 1950s and 60s • CEEB Commission on Mathematics 1959 report • Soviet Launch of Sputnik in 1957 • National Defense Education Act of 1958 • Paradigm Shift in Mathematics Education • New Math focus on Conceptual Understanding of Mathematics rather than Rote Memorization • Discover, Deduction, and Limited Drill What Did New Math Look Like? Bases other than Different Number Sets 10 Representations Reasoning Discovering New Language Solution Before Hidden Patterns Rule Diagrams Properties of Boxes Matrices Arithmetic Frames 1951 1957 & 1958 Max Beberman Edward Begle University of Illinois School Committee on Mathematics School Mathematics Study Group (UICSM) (SMSG) Beberman and Begle promoted a complete conceptual overhaul of math instruction. “Mathematics should be taught as a language, he said. And like language, it should be considered a liberal art, a key to clear thinking, and a logic for solving social as well as scientific problems” (Miller, 1990). “Modern Math” Language Discovery New math quickly won wide acceptance. 50% of all high schools were using New Math as their curriculum by 1965 (Miller, 1990). At its peak, 85% of all elementary and secondary schools had adopted New Math (Miller, 1990). PUBLIC SENTIMENT Image copyright Charles Schulz. Frustration • Ridiculed and deemed a failure by the general public. • Tom Lehrer spoofed with song New Math. • Parents didn’t understand children’s homework. • Teachers not trained on how to implement and instruct the new method. • Implementation inconsistent. What happened to New Math? Where did it go? 40 years later… Enter Common Core 1 National Learning Objectives 2 Adopted by 45 states within a few months.
    [Show full text]
  • New Math” for the 21 Century
    ”New math” for the 21st century Gunnar Gjone: Some time ago I was listenening to a presentation on the use of internet in education. Concentrating on the internet as a source of information, the presenter stated that it would be important if students could combine search criteria, by the laws of logic, to perform more efficient searches. Perhaps the proponents of the ”new math” had been too early in time for mathematics education? Over the years I had realized that many uses of computers build strongly on logic – forms of programming are obvious examples. Many uses of application programs such as word processors and spreadsheets would also be more efficient by the use of logic. Computers are ”logic machines”, so why not logic in basic mathematics education? The ”new math” revisited The ”new math” movement lasted in most countries from the late 1950s to the early 1970s. In many countries this reform was replaced with stressing the basic skills, i.e.arithmetic/ computation. Also in many countries these changes resulted in strong discussions and heated debates among mathematics educators. The ”new math” movement, however, was not one single reform. It had many different forms, but there was common elements. We can use concepts such as ”structure” and ”logic” to talk about these common elements, but the ”new math” movement was much more. Also it should be noted that many other reforms e.g. individualized math instruction used new math to gain momentum. Some characteristics of the ”new math” movement We will concentrate on two of the characteristics of the movement: the mathematical and the pedagogical.
    [Show full text]