Cultutral Xpression Oct 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultutral Xpression Oct 2019 P1 FREECULTURAL XPRESSION - OCT 2019 Culture CULTURAL XPRESSION - OCT 2019 P2 THE MAN BEHIND MULLET BAY & USM HUSHANG ANSARY HUSHANG AN- of Stewart & Steven- SARY (Per- son LLC until the com- pany was purchased ههههه :sian -born by Kirby Corp in Sep ,هههههه July 1926) is an Ira- tember 2018. nian-American former In recent years An- diplomat, business- sari and Parman have man, and philanthro- come under scrutiny pist. He served for of the Central Bank eighteen years in the of Curaçao and Sint Iranian government Maarten (CBCS) with prior to the Iranian regard to financial Revolution including misappropriations re- as Minister of Eco- garding an insurance nomic Affairs and company operating Finance and Iran’s in the Dutch Carib- Ambassador to the bean islands of Aru- United States from ba, Curaçao and Sint 1967-1969. He has to the United States marriage “came to a He was the director of Maarten. The CBCS been chairman or di- and then as Minister bitter end” according an unstable compa- has stated that under rector of companies of Economic Affairs to historian Abbas Mi- ny called Fakhre Iran, shareholder Parman both in Iran and in the and Finance. His ac- lani, has said that “not which he made prof- International B.V., United States. complishments during appointing Hushang itable and sold to the in which Ansary is a this time included as- was one of the shah’s government. Ansary majority shareholder, Political career sisting the Shah in two biggest mistakes, arrived in the U.S. a ENNIA Caribe Hold- Born in Ahvaz, lending millions of dol- leading to the revo- very wealthy man and ing and ENNIA Cari- in Iran’s Khuzestan lars in aid and grants lution.” In November became a U.S. cit- be Investments had Province, Ansary first to other countries 1977, Ansary became izen in 1986. After appropriated 1,5 bil- worked as a news- and the signing of an the director of the Na- settling in the United lion Antillean guilders paper and magazine agreement with U.S. tional Iranian Oil Com- States, Ansary start- (approximately $838 photographer in Ah- State Secretary Hen- pany, but resigned ed the Parman Group, million) from ENNIA vaz, Tehran, and En- ry Kissinger to build one year later and a holding company for insurance compa- gland before moving eight nuclear power moved to the United leisure industries, nies. These insurance to Japan in 1954. plants in Iran. States, citing health textiles, internation- companies operate on There he met Abbas By the 1970s, problems. al trade, and real es- the islands of Curaçao Aram, Iran’s ambas- the CIA considered tate, which included and Sint Maarten and sador to Japan, who Ansary to be one of Business and IRI International - a therefore fall under soon brought him to seventeen members philanthropy company that makes the supervision of the the attention of Shah of “the Shah’s Inner During his time in oilfield equipment. IRI CBCS. According to Mohammad Reza Circle” and he was the Iranian govern- International was sold Pahlavi. The Shah one of the Shah’s top ment, Ansary also to National Oilwell CONTINUED ON asked Ansary to re- two choices to suc- maintained a success- Varco in 2005. Ansa- PAGE 4 turn to Iran and ap- ceed Amir Abbas Hov- ful career in business. ry was the chairman pointed him to several eyda as Prime Min- government positions ister. Ultimately, this starting in 1961, in- appointment went cluding Undersecre- to Jamshid Amouze- tary of Commerce, gar, and Ansary be- ambassador to many came the leader of the African nations and to Constructionist wing Pakistan, and Minister of the Rastakhiz par- of Information. ty, which opposed In 1964, he mar- Amouzegar’s Progres- ried Maryam Panahi, a sive wing. Some of friend of ambassador Ansary’s supporters Aram who had many have seen Amouze- high-ranking acquain- gar’s appointment tances in the govern- as a poor decision in ments of the United hindsight. Even his States and Iran. He now ex-wife Maryam served as Ambassador Panahi, to whom his P3 CULTURAL XPRESSION - OCT 2019 Culture AFRO-CARIBBEAN PEOPLE MARY SEACOLE... PT 7 By Wiki giene decades before Seacole was to be military history and CONTROVERSIES Nightingale. Jennings removed from the a fundamental shift An article by suggested that race National Curriculum. away from social his- Lynn McDonald in plays a part in the Opposing this, Greg tory.” A lot of com- the Times Literary resistance to Seacole Jenner, historical mentators do not Supplement asked by some of Night- consultant to Hor- accept the disput- “How did Mary Se- ingale’s support- rible Histories, has ed Eurocentric view acole come to be ers. The American stated that while he that Seacole’s ac- viewed as a pioneer academic Gretchen thought her medical complishments were of modern nurs- Gerzina has implied achievements may exaggerated. Patrick ing?”, comparing that racism was a have been exagger- Vernon opines that a her unfavourably motivating factor ated, removing Se- lot of the claims that with Kofoworola behind a lot of criti- Mary Jane Seacole acole from the cur- Seacole’s achieve- Pratt who was the cism of Seacole from came known as obe- ed it as one of her riculum would be a ments were exag- first black nurse in members of the Brit- ah in Jamaica. Ac- key reforms in her mistake. While Peter gerated came from the NHS, and con- ish establishment cording to the writer book Notes on Nurs- Hitchens has argued an English elite that cluded “She de- and media. One crit- Helen Rappaport, in ing in 1859. It is that Seacole’s ac- was determined to serves much credit icism made by sup- the late eighteenth possible that Night- complishments have suppress and hide for rising to the oc- porters of Nightingale and early nineteenth ingale learned about been exaggerated the black contribu- casion, but her tea of Seacole is that she centuries, the West the value of hygiene because anybody tion in Britain. Helen and lemonade did was not trained at an African and Jamaican in nursing from the who put a contrary Seaton observes that not save lives, pio- established British creole “doctress”, practices of Seacole. view was afraid to Nightingale fitted the neer nursing or ad- hospital. However, such as Cornwallis Seacole’s name be accused of rac- English ideal of a Vic- vance health care”. that Eurocentric crit- and Sarah Adams, appears in an appen- ism, both Jenner and torian heroine more However, this icism ignores the fact who both died in the dix to the Key Stage Hugh Muir have as- than a dark-skinned criticism belittles that Jamaican nurs- late 1840s, often had 2 National Curricu- serted that this is Seacole, who bat- the achievements es such as Seacole greater success than lum, as an example not the case. Susan tled racial prejudice of Jamaican “doc- and Cubah Cornwal- the European-trained of a significant Victo- Sheridan has argued from English people tresses” such as lis, and even Nanny doctor who practised rian historical figure. that the leaked pro- who had little under- Seacole, who used of the Maroons, de- what was then tra- There is no require- posal to remove Se- standing about Ca- more than “tea and veloped their nurs- ditional medicine. ment that teachers acole from the Na- ribbean herbal rem- lemonade” to heal ing skills from West These doctresses of include Seacole in tional Curriculum is edies. the ill and wounded, African healing tradi- Jamaica practised their lessons. At the part of “a concentra- often using herbal tions, such as the use hygiene long before end of 2012 it was tion solely on large- remedies and hy- of herbs, which be- Nightingale adopt- reported that Mary scale political and MARCH 2018 - CULTURAL XPRESSION - PG 4 Agriculture CULTURAL XPRESSION - OCT 2019 P4 ECO SXM MAKE ITS PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENT was set for Nov 5, questions asked by Nov 2019 edition. In 2019 where I would our MP’S. Will share the mean time, let’s have to answer all the more on this topic on keep it growing… SPACELESS GARDENS AT SMILE OCT 2019 was a very Oct 2019 just in time Perhaps its just inspiring month as for the new upcoming politics to gain recog- I got to spread the elections. The meet- nition for giving Agri- awareness and impor- ing was called by MP culture the platform tance of agriculture to Rolando Brison based to voice its direction my fellow men, wom- on our request earlier to the general public, en and this time also this year to request but nevertheless , we including Parliament. for government to were able to make a Although this meeting subsidize the Agricul- strong presentation had to take place in tural Research and with hopes that this May 2019 earlier this Development Centers time around it may President of USM Dr Antonio Carmona reviews locally made artwork by year was still grate- efforts for country St not fall on deaf ears. artist Kenneth Samson at SHTA’s 2019 SMILE Event. ful it came around in Maarten. A follow up meeting ECO SXM \ USM: WASTE AS A RESOURCE USM Students at ECO St Maarten Agricultural Research and Develop- A master class for seed bombing and Agriculture by Ms Tes Verheij of ment Center Wasta Factory and Mr Wyatte of ECO SXM STUDENTS of USM stration on Waste as ganic waste material get hands on during a resource ! The fo- that may be used to the month of October cus was to get more compliment agricul- 2019 at ECO SXM with info on how to reduce, tural sustainability for a lecture and demon- reuse and recycle or- St.
Recommended publications
  • Nixon, Kissinger, and the Shah: the Origins of Iranian Primacy in the Persian Gulf
    Roham Alvandi Nixon, Kissinger, and the Shah: the origins of Iranian primacy in the Persian Gulf Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Alvandi, Roham (2012) Nixon, Kissinger, and the Shah: the origins of Iranian primacy in the Persian Gulf. Diplomatic history, 36 (2). pp. 337-372. ISSN 1467-7709 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7709.2011.01025.x © 2012 The Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (SHAFR) This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32743/ Available in LSE Research Online: March 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. roham alvandi Nixon, Kissinger, and the Shah: The Origins of Iranian Primacy in the Persian Gulf* On the morning of May 31, 1972, the shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, received U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Joint Commission (With Annexes)
    No. 15682 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and IRAN Agreed Minutes of the second session of the United States- Iran Joint Commission (with annexes). Signed at Wash ington on 4 March 1975 Authentic text: English. Registered by the United States of America on 19 May 1977. ETATS-UNIS D'AMÉRIQUE et IRAN Procès-verbal approuvé de la deuxième session de la Com mission mixte États-Unis/Iran (avec annexes). Signé à Washington le 4 mars 1975 Texte authentique : anglais. Enregistré par les États-Unis d'Amérique le 19 mai 1977. Vol. 1041, 1-15682 116 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1977 AGREED MINUTES1 OF THE SECOND SESSION OF THE UNITED STATES-IRAN JOINT COMMISSION The Second Session of the United States-Iran Joint Commission for Economie Cooperation was held in Washington on March 3 and 4, 1975. The Delegation of the United States was headed by Dr. Henry A. Kissinger, the Secretary of State, and the Iranian Delegation was led by Mr. Hushang Ansary, Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance. The Lists of the two Delega tions are given in Annexes 1 and 2. The Commission discussed the world monetary and economic situation and agreed on the need for effective measures to cope with the problems of inflation- cum-recession with which the international community is faced. In this connection the two sides agreed to work closely together in their mutual desire to introduce a new order in their relations in the light of the new realities of the world economic situation. The Commission reviewed the latest developments in United States-Iran economic relations, and concluded that the scope for cooperation between the two countries was almost unlimited.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtesy of Oral History Research Office Columbia University The
    Courtesy of Oral History Research Office Columbia University The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History roject WILLIAM W. LEHFELDT Interviewed by: William Burr Initial interview date: April 29, 1987 Copyright Columbia niversity TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in California U.S. Army - World War II (eorgetown University and Harvard University Entered the Foreign Service Early Assignments Diplomatic courier 1,5. AID program - Afghanistan 1,52-1,55 Bilbao0 Spain - Consul 1,55-1,51 State Department - Washington0 DC 1,51-1,21 Buenos Aires0 Argentina - etroleum Officer 1,21 Cordova0 Argentina - Consul 1,22-1,23 State Department - Washington0 DC - ersonnel 1,23-1,22 Naples0 Italy - rincipal Officer 1,22-1,21 Economic Counselor - Teheran0 Iran 1,2,-1,13 Iran lan Organi5ation Embassy ersonnel and Duties Ambassador Douglas 6acArthur III Ambassador Farland - 1,12 Ambassador Helms - 1,13 Contacts in Iranian (overnment The Shah Economic Conditions U.S. policy towards Iran Ni8on diplomacy CIA operations U.S. interests 1 U.S. petroleum operations O EC Teheran Agreement - 1,11 9ohn Irwin mission Oil company negotiations with Iran St. 6orit5 Agreement - 1,12 Arab boycott of U.S. - 1,13 :Recycling: of oil country revenues U.S.-Iran 9oint Economic Commission Ni8on 1,12 visit U.S. military supplies U.S. banking presence Bankers' Conference Iran's economic situation - 1,2,-1,1. E8-Im Bank financing U.S. arms sales U.S. Embassy assistance Commercial :pay-offs: Shah's anti-corruption policy U.S.-Iran Chamber of Commerce U.S. concerned over Iran's arms spending Communications facilities (rowing criticism of Shah - internal and e8ternal Teheran0 Iran - Vice resident0 (eneral Electric 1,13-1,18 6ilitary aircraft Nuclear energy industry Investments in consumer products Iran-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Augury of Revolution: the Iranian Student Movement and American Foreign Policy, 1960-1972
    AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT MOVEMENT AND AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY, 1960-1972 Matthew K. Shannon A Thesis Submitted to the University of North Carolina at Wilmington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of North Carolina at Wilmington 2009 Approved by Advisory Committee Lisa Pollard Michael Seidman W. Taylor Fain Chair Accepted by ____________________ Dean, Graduate School TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................................iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. v DEDICATION.............................................................................................................................vii ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................viii CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHY................................................... 1 CHAPTER II – THE POLITICIZATION OF IRANIAN STUDENTS ABROAD, 1960-1963 ........................................................................................................................ 28 CHAPTER III – THE JOHNSON ADMINISTRATION AND IRANIAN STUDENT PROTEST, 1964-1968 ........................................................................................................................ 50 CHAPTER IV – THE RADICALIZATION OF IRANIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Fateful Consequences: U.S.-Iran Relations During
    FATEFUL CONSEQUENCES: U.S.-IRAN RELATIONS DURING THE NIXON AND FORD ADMINISTRATIONS, 1969-77 BY ANDREW SCOTT COOPER A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (2012) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………... 3 Timeline of Events……………………………………………………………………….……5 Personalities………………………………………………………………………………….10 Introduction: WHEN THE SHAH FELL, OUR POLICY FELL WITH HIM ……………………13 Chapter One: I LIKE HIM, I LIKE HIM AND I LIKE HIS COUNTRY: U.S.-Iran Relations in Nixon’s First Term, 1969-72………………………………………………………………....45 Chapter Two: POPEYE IS RUNNING OUT OF CHEAP SPINACH : U.S.-Iran Relations and the 1973 Energy Crisis, October War and Arab Oil Boycott………………………………….....75 Chapter Three: WE ARE HEADED FOR DISASTER IN THE INDUSTRIAL WORLD : U.S.-Iran Relations and the 1973-74 Oil Shock………………………………………………….........101 Chapter Four: THE INFLUENCE OF THE WHALE OVER ITS CAPTORS : The Nixon and Ford Administrations Respond to the Oil Shock, 1974-75…………………………………….....118 Chapter Five: I NOT ONLY MAKE THE DECISIONS, I DO THE THINKING : Pahlavi Iran and the 1974-75 Oil Boom……………………………………………………………………....146 Chapter Six: WE HAVE GIVEN IN WHEN THE SHAH REALLY WANTED IT : Realities Collide Over Oil Policy, Arms Sales and Nuclear Cooperation, 1974-75………………….169 Chapter Seven: IRAN IS ON THE VERGE OF MOVING AWAY FROM US : Impasse and Confrontation, 1976………………………………………………………………...………194 Conclusion: FATEFUL
    [Show full text]
  • The National Iranian Oil Company in Iranian Politics
    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY THE NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY IN IRANIAN POLITICS BY DANIEL BRUMBERG GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ARIEL I. AHRAM GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ENERGY STUDY SPONSORED BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER RICE UNIVERSITY – MARCH 2007 THIS PAPER WAS WRITTEN BY A RESEARCHER (OR RESEARCHERS) WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE JOINT BAKER INSTITUTE/JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER POLICY REPORT, THE CHANGING ROLE OF NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES IN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY MARKETS. WHEREVER FEASIBLE, THIS PAPER HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY OUTSIDE EXPERTS BEFORE RELEASE. HOWEVER, THE RESEARCH AND THE VIEWS EXPRESSED WITHIN ARE THOSE OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHER(S) AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY NOR THOSE OF THE JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER. © 2007 BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY THIS MATERIAL MAY BE QUOTED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION, PROVIDED APPROPRIATE CREDIT IS GIVEN TO THE AUTHOR AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ABOUT THE POLICY REPORT THE CHANGING ROLE OF NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES IN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY MARKETS Of world proven oil reserves of 1,148 billion barrels, approximately 77% of these resources are under the control of national oil companies (NOCs) with no equity participation by foreign, international oil companies. The Western international oil companies now control less than 10% of the world’s oil and gas resource base. In terms of current world oil production, NOCs also dominate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for the Revolution's Soul
    IRAN: THE STRUGGLE FOR THE REVOLUTION’S SOUL 5 August 2002 ICG Middle East Report N°5 Amman/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. IRAN’S POLITICAL STRUCTURE: RELIGION, REVOLUTION AND REFORM ................................................................................................................................. 3 A. THE CONSTITUTIONAL CENTRES OF POWER ..........................................................................3 1. The Supreme Leader of the Revolution.....................................................................3 2. The President .............................................................................................................5 3. The Constitutional Assemblies..................................................................................5 B. SECURITY AND PARASTATAL FORCES ...................................................................................7 1. Revolutionary Foundations........................................................................................7 2. The Law Enforcement Forces....................................................................................8 3. The Basij Militia........................................................................................................8 4. The Revolutionary Guards.........................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • On Thin Ice: the Iran Nuclear Deal at Three
    On Thin Ice: The Iran Nuclear Deal at Three Middle East Report N°195 | 16 January 2019 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Implementation Record: A Mixed Bag ............................................................................. 3 A. Nuclear Commitments ............................................................................................... 3 B. Sanctions Relief Commitments ................................................................................. 6 III. A Race Against Time ......................................................................................................... 13 A. Washington: Maximum Pressure .............................................................................. 13 B. Tehran: Maximum Patience ...................................................................................... 16 C. Brussels: Maxed Out .................................................................................................. 22 IV. Die Another Day ............................................................................................................... 26 V. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Web: the Making and Unmaking of Iran Sanctions
    Spider Web: The Making and Unmaking of Iran Sanctions Middle East Report N°138 | 25 February 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Weaving the Net ............................................................................................................... 5 A. Unilateral U.S. Sanctions ........................................................................................... 5 B. Coordinated Multilateral Sanctions .......................................................................... 12 C. United Nations Sanctions .......................................................................................... 14 D. Shell Games: Enforcement and Evasion ................................................................... 15 III. The Impact of Sanctions ................................................................................................... 19 A. Impact on the Nuclear and Missile Programs ........................................................... 19 B. Impact on the Energy Sector ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Who Whispers in the King's Ear, for How Long, and to What Effect? the Primary Hypothesis Guiding This Study Is That E
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: TO WHISPER IN THE KING’S EAR: ECONOMISTS IN PAHLAVI AND ISLAMIC IRAN Ehsanee Ian Sadr, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Directed by: Professor Virginia Haufler Department of Government and Politics Who whispers in the King’s ear, for how long, and to what effect? The primary hypothesis guiding this study is that economists gain influence when the international resources they can deliver are valued and desired by the country’s political leadership; and economists lose influence when those resources are not valued or desired. Alternate hypotheses that consider the role of increasing complexity in international economic relations, epistemic communities, emulation, and economists’ political activity are also considered. These hypotheses are evaluated through a study of the experiences of economists in Iran under both the Pahlavi monarchy and the Islamic regime. Results indicate support for the primary hypothesis that economists are desired for their ability to signal competence and gain the trust of the international financial and donor communities. Surprisingly, especially in the Islamic Republic, epistemic communities of economists are also found to have been very successful in using moments of political or economic crisis to influence the worldview and economic policy preferences of political leaders. TO WHISPER IN THE KING’S EAR: ECONOMISTS IN PAHLAVI AND ISLAMIC IRAN By Ehsanee Ian Sadr Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Virginia Haufler, Chair Professor Shibley Telhami Professor Karol Soltan Professor Margaret Pearson Professor Ahmad Karimi-Hakkak © Copyright by Ehsanee Ian Sadr 2013 To Allison and Ali Sadr who believed in me from the first breath.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carter Administration and the Fall of Iran's Pahlavi Dynasty : US-Iran Relations on the Brink of the 1979 Revolution / Javier Gil Guerrero
    The Carter Administration and the Fall of Iran’s Pahlavi Dynasty This page intentionally left blank The Carter Administration and the Fall of Iran’s Pahlavi Dynasty US–Iran Relations on the Brink of the 1979 Revolution Javier Gil Guerrero Palgrave macmillan THE CARTER ADMINISTRATION AND THE FALL OF IRAN’S PAHLAVI DYNASTY Copyright © Javier Gil Guerrero 2016 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2016 978-1-137-59871-4 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission. In accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published 2016 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of Nature America, Inc., One New York Plaza, Suite 4500, New York, NY 10004-1562. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Loving and Hating America in Turkey and Iran: a Cold War Story of Alliance Politics and Authoritarian Modernization, 1945-1980
    Loving and Hating America in Turkey and Iran: A Cold War Story of Alliance Politics and Authoritarian Modernization, 1945-1980 Barın Kayaoğlu Ankara, Turkey B.A., Bilkent University, 2001 M.A., Bilkent University, 2002 M.A., Bilkent University, 2005 M.A., University of Virginia, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia December 2014 © Copyright by Barın Kayaoğlu All Rights Reserved December 2014 To Lara, Arda, Ayla, Hasan, Barkın, and Demet and Mel Leffler, the captain with the mighty heart Abstract This dissertation is a study of U.S. relations with Turkey and Iran during the Cold War and the rise of anti-Americanism in the two countries. The dissertation explores why pro-American sentiments in Turkey and Iran in the 1940s and 1950s turned into vicious anti-Americanism in the 1960s and reached a crescendo by the 1970s. The study argues that, rather than individual events such as the CIA-sponsored coup d’état against Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq in 1953 or the successive coups in Turkey, authoritarian modernization in the two countries and their turbulent alliances with the United States led to anti-Americanism. Although U.S. officials encouraged economic and social development in Turkey and Iran – building schools, hospitals, dams, factories, and roads – they remained mostly silent on the question of political change for the sake of stability. While authoritarianism undermined the political institutions that could have ameliorated economic and social ills in the two countries, Ankara and Tehran’s geopolitical interests began to diverge from Washington’s global and regional priorities by the 1960s.
    [Show full text]