DOCSLIB.ORG

Danish Reactions to German Occupation Brings a Full Overview of the Occupation to an English-Speaking Audience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Danish Reactions to German Occupation Brings a Full Overview of the Occupation to an English-Speaking Audience DANISH DANISH OR FIVE YEARS DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR, Denmark was TO REACTIONS F occupied by Germany. While the Danish reaction to this period of its history has been extensively discussed in Danish-language publications, it has not until now received a thorough treatment in English. Set in the context of modern Danish foreign relations, and tracing the country’s responses to successive crises and wars in the region, Danish Reactions to German Occupation brings a full overview of the occupation to an English-speaking audience. Holbraad carefully dissects the motivations and ideologies driving conduct during the occupation, and his authoritative coverage of the preceding century provides a crucial link to understanding the forces behind Danish GE foreign policy divisions. Analysing the conduct of a traumatized and strategically exposed R small state bordering on an aggressive great power, the book traces a MAN development from reluctant cooperation to active resistance. Holbraad CARSTEN CARSTEN goes on to survey and examine the subsequent, and not yet quite HOLBRAAD HOLBRAAD finished, debate among historians about this contested period. That O debate is between those still siding with the resistance and a majority CCUPATION more inclined to justify limited cooperation with the occupiers – and DANISH sometimes even condone various acts of collaboration. CARSTEN HOLBRAAD studied at the LSE with a Leverhulme undergraduate scholarship, and gained a DPhil at the University of Sussex in the field of European history of ideas. He has held REACTIONS research and teaching positions at the Institute of Advanced Studies of the ANU in Canberra, Carleton University and Queen’s University in Canada, El Collegio de Mexico and at LSE and UCL. HOLBRAAD CARSTEN His previous books include Internationalism and Nationalism TO GERMAN in European Political Thought (2003) and Danish Neutrality (1991). OCCUPATION COVER DESIGN: Rawshock design £35.00 i Danish Reactions to German Occupation ii iii Danish Reactions to German Occupation History and Historiography Carsten Holbraad iv First published in 2017 by UCL Press University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT Available to download free: www.ucl.ac.uk/ ucl- press Text © Carsten Holbraad, 2017 A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. This book is published under a Creative Common 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Carsten Holbraad, Danish Reactions to German Occupation. London, UCL Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14324/111. 9781911307495 Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/ Front cover image: Headquarters of the Schalburg Corps, a Danish SS unit, after 1943. The occupied building is the lodge of the Danish Order of Freemasons located on Blegdamsvej, Copenhagen. Courtesy of Nationalmuseet, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. ISBN: 978– 1– 911307– 51– 8 (Hbk.) ISBN: 978– 1– 911307– 50– 1 (Pbk.) ISBN: 978– 1– 911307– 49– 5 (PDF) ISBN: 978– 1– 911307– 52– 5 (epub) ISBN: 978– 1– 911307– 53– 2 (mobi) ISBN: 978– 1– 911307– 54– 9 (html) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/ 111.9781911307495 v To the memory of Jørgen Hæstrup – who started it all. vi Preface In Danish Neutrality: A Study in the Foreign Policy of a Small State (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1991), I identified and analysed certain ideas and attitudes behind Danish foreign policy in modern and contemporary history. Focusing on situations of crisis or war in the region, I detected two opposing tendencies in Danish reactions, namely towards engage- ment in and withdrawal from international conflict. At one stage, I considered the idea of following up with a briefer work which would explore a similar duality of attitudes to foreign affairs to be found in some modern Danish fictional literature. Instead, I decided to narrow the historical focus, and examine Danish reactions to the country’s most traumatic experience in recent history: the five years of German occupation during the Second World War. There were two reasons for this choice. In a conversation with my son and his friend Morten A. Pedersen – both members of the small and exclusive group of Danish anthropol- ogists with a PhD from King’s College, now known as the Cambridge Danes – Morten pointed out that there was a need for someone to get on top of the ongoing debate among historians and others about Danish conduct during the German occupation. On a more personal level, a topic focusing on that relatively brief period had the attraction of taking me back to the subject matter of my initial introduction to historical research. As a high- school student at Sct. Knuds Gymnasium in Odense who had mastered the skills of ste- nography and typing, I spent most of my spare time in 1947– 48 working as a secretary to Jørgen Hæstrup, a young and dynamic history mas- ter who recently had started collecting material about the resistance movement for the Danish Public Record Office. Destined to become the leading historian of Danish resistance and its links with Britain, he was in the process of locating secret archives and securing written verbal reports from key resistance figures. vi vii Taking down reports and typing out archival material, I met quite a few members of the resistance and gained some knowledge of its activ- ities. I also formed a good working relationship with Hæstrup. Though I was unable to accept repeated invitations in later decades to join his group of young occupation historians, my friendship with him lasted till his death in 1998. Thus, it is appropriate to dedicate this work to the memory of Jørgen Hæstrup. It offers a spectral analysis of Danish reactions to the German occupation and presents a critical overview of subsequent and recent historiographical debate about a crucial national experience not yet fully digested. The first part of the book presents Danish conduct in the Second World War in a historical context by sketching out the foreign relations of the country in modern times and tracing its reactions to successive crises and wars in the region. For its earlier sections, I draw on my first book about the history of Danish foreign policy, mentioned above. The second part lays out the historically attested and widely known reactions to German occupation from the invasion on 9 April 1940 to the liberation on 5 May 1945. However, for analytical reasons, the order of presentation is logical rather than chronological, ranging from willing cooperation at one end to armed resistance at the other. Yet, that order happens to correspond fairly well with the actual chronological develop- ment over the five years. The third part of the book deals with the historiography about the occupation period, from the first post- war decades till well into the pres- ent century. Three waves of writings have been distinguished. The post- war works, mostly written by historians and other writers who identified with the resistance movement, tended to present a picture of growing resistance backed by increasing public support. Subsequently a revision- ist wave of scholarship took a more critical view of resistance, perhaps at the same time adopting a more sympathetic attitude to cooperation. More recently, a second wave of revisionism, less interested in the his- tory of resistance, took up the cases of various groups of individuals who had engaged in some form of collaboration with the occupiers. That part closes with a tentative overview of recent trends in scholarly debate and a brief presentation of recurrent public discourse about Danish reactions to the occupation. Though Norway occasionally has been brought into the picture, no attempt has been made in this book to make comparisons and draw par- allels with other countries under German occupation. Each such coun- try was in a geopolitical situation of its own in relation to the European PREFACE vii viii conflict, and had its own history of interacting with rivalling great pow- ers and its own tradition of dealing with a preponderant and threaten- ing power. Moreover, the policy and conduct of the occupying power varied from country to country. Thus, as for both its situation and its conduct during the Second World War, Denmark was a special case, which should be examined separately rather than fitted into some quasi- comparative framework. Much of the book was researched and written while I was Honorary Research Associate in the Department of Scandinavian Studies at UCL. As such, I much enjoyed the use of the UCL Library’s excellent collection of books about the history, politics and culture of Denmark and other Nordic countries. I am grateful to Knud J.V. Jespersen, professor emeritus at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense, for generous and useful comments on an early draft. The constructive criticism and good advice of the anonymous reviewers are also much appreciated. In particular, I am indebted to the expert on Danish occupation historiography for help- ing me find a way through recent literature. London C. H. viii PREFACE ix newgenprepdf Contents Introduction 1 1 Traumas and trends 4 1.1 1814 6 1.2 1864 12 1.3 1914 17 1.4 1940 21 2 1940– 45: From cooperation to resistance 42 2.1 Support 42 2.2 Cooperation 51 2.3 Opposition 75 3 Since 1945: From resistance to collaboration 131 3.1 Concord 132 3.2 Conflict 156 3.3 Discord 173 3.4 Debate 189 3.5 Discourse 207 Conclusion 214 Notes 221 Works cited 226 Index 229 ix x 1 Introduction For Denmark, the most momentous experience of the twentieth century was the five years of German occupation during the Second World War.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Forces' Wear of Non-Standard Uniforms*
    Special Forces’ Wear of Non-Standard Uniforms* W. Hays Parks** In February 2002, newspapers in the United States and United Kingdom published complaints by some nongovernmental organizations (“NGOs”) about US and other Coalition special operations forces operating in Afghanistan in “civilian clothing.”1 The reports sparked debate within the NGO community and among military judge advocates about the legality of such actions.2 At the US Special Operations Command (“USSOCOM”) annual Legal Conference, May 13–17, 2002, the judge advocate debate became intense. While some attendees raised questions of “illegality” and the right or obligation of special operations forces to refuse an “illegal order” to wear “civilian clothing,” others urged caution.3 The discussion was unclassified, and many in the room were not * Copyright © 2003 W. Hays Parks. ** Law of War Chair, Office of General Counsel, Department of Defense; Special Assistant for Law of War Matters to The Judge Advocate General of the Army, 1979–2003; Stockton Chair of International Law, Naval War College, 1984–1985; Colonel, US Marine Corps Reserve (Retired); Adjunct Professor of International Law, Washington College of Law, American University, Washington, DC. The views expressed herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the Department of Defense or any other agency of the United States government. The author is indebted to Professor Jack L. Goldsmith for his advice and assistance during the research and writing of this article. 1 See, for example, Michelle Kelly and Morten Rostrup, Identify Yourselves: Coalition Soldiers in Afghanistan Are Endangering Aid Workers, Guardian (London) 19 (Feb 1, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Regulator\ Reform in Denmark
    5HJXODWRU\ 5HIRUP LQ 'HQPDUN (QKDQFLQJ 0DUNHW 2SHQQHVV WKURXJK 5HJXODWRU\ 5HIRUP ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). Publié en français sous le titre : AMÉLIORER L’OUVERTURE DES MARCHÉS GRACE A LA RÉFORME DE LA RÉGLEMENTATION © OECD 2000. Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, tel.
    [Show full text]
  • British Clandestine Activities in Romania During the Second World
    British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War This page intentionally left blank British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War Dennis Deletant Visiting ‘Ion Ra¸tiu’ Professor of Romanian Studies, Georgetown University, USA © Dennis Deletant 2016 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2016 978–1–137–57451–0 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2016 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hal Koch, Grundtvig and the Rescue of the Danish Jews: a Case Study in the Democratic Mobilisation for Non-Violent Resistance
    Hal Koch, Grundtvig and the rescue of the Danish Jews: A case study in the democratic mobilisation for non-violent resistance By Steven Borish The Danish people’s successful cultural mobilisation for resistance against the Nazi Occupation (1940-1945) culminated in the rescue operation that took place in the autumn of 1943 when 7220 of the approximately 7800 Jews then in Denmark were successfully transported to safety in neutral Sweden. In events set in motion from the invasion of 9 April 1940, through the summer of that year and the following year, a key role was played by a living charis­ matic leader, Hal Koch, and, through him, by his memorable nineteenth-cen­ tury predecessor, N. F. S. Grundtvig. These remarkable events are properly to be contextualized not only in Danish history but also in the annals of non­ violent action as a path to the accomplishment of national goals. I. Grundtvig as the background figure who makes everything come together Statement of the problem On 9 April 1940 the Nazi German invasion of Denmark precipitated one of the deepest crises in the many centuries of Danish history. The late spring, summer and early autumn of 1940, saw the establishment of a Nazi Occupation following the short but overwhelming invasion. During these tense and difficult months many Danes from all walks of life began to meet, discuss and plan for cultural resistance.1 Yet the contributions of two men, one living and one dead, are of special importance in understanding the events of this critical period; together they lit a spark which successfully catalysed the first phase of a broad and popular mobilisation for cultural resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Many Ways to Be Right: the Unbundling of European Mass Attitudes and Partisan Asymmetries Across the Ideological Divide
    Many Ways to Be Right: The Unbundling of European Mass Attitudes and Partisan Asymmetries Across the Ideological Divide The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Gidron, Noam. 2016. Many Ways to Be Right: The Unbundling of European Mass Attitudes and Partisan Asymmetries Across the Ideological Divide. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493265 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Many Ways to be Right: The Unbundling of European Mass Attitudes and Partisan Asymmetries across the Ideological Divide A dissertation presented by Noam Gidron to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2016 ©2016 — Noam Gidron All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Peter A. Hall Noam Gidron Many Ways to be Right: The Unbundling of European Mass Attitudes and Partisan Asymmetries across the Ideological Divide Abstract How do individuals with conflicting attitudes on different issues – those with conservative attitudes on some issues but progressive attitudes on other issues – form their partisan allegiances? In examining this question, my dissertation advances an argument about the asymmetry in European mass attitudes across the left-right divide. I argue that when individuals connect their political attitudes to left-right ideological labels they have many ways to be right – yet mostly one way to be left.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 Places of Refuge for Ships: the Danish Approach
    Chapter 17 Places of Refuge for Ships: The Danish Approach John Liljedahl INTRODUCTION Every year, about 60,000 ships pass through Danish waters, and this figure does not include domestic ferry traffic. The majority of the ships will, during a con- siderable part of their passage, be less than five nautical miles from the coast- line and will pass through a strait1 into the Danish territorial sea2 or pass in a 1 Passage by merchant vessels through the Danish Straits (the Little Belt, the Great Belt and the Sound) is regulated by a treaty between Denmark and most of the European States signed at Copenhagen on 14 March 1857, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Montego Bay, 10 December 1982, UN/Doc. A/CONF.62/122, 7 October 1982 (hereafter LOS Convention), and customary international law. Denmark became a party to the LOS Convention in 2004. Upon ratification, the Denmark made the follow- ing declaration: 'It is the position of the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark that the exception from the transit passage regime provided for in article 35 (c) of the Convention applies to the specific regime in the Danish straits (the Great Belt, the Little Belt and the Danish part of the Sound), which has developed on the basis of the 455 Aldo Chircop and Olof Linden (Eds.), Places of Refuge for Ships: Emerging Environmental Concerns of a Maritime Custom. 455–469. © 2006 Koninklijke Brill N.V. Printed in the Netherlands. 456 Chapter 17 corridor along the territorial sea of Denmark, Sweden or Germany (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Historisk Samling Fra Besættelsestiden
    Historisk Samling fra Besættelsestiden Arkivregistrant Denne registrant er en vejviser til arkivet på Historisk Samling fra Besættelsestiden. Arkivet indeholder et bredt materiale fra og om modstandsbevægelsen – fra illegale blade over Frihedsrådets proklamationer til beretninger fra modstandsfolk landet over. Desuden omfatter arkivet fx britisk propagandamateriale, rapporter og skrivelser fra danske myndigheder, materiale fra de politiske partier, tysk og dansk-nazistisk propaganda, kopier af sager fra retsopgøret samt forsknings- og personarkiver. Dele af materialet er kun groft registreret, og den store samling af illegalt materiale venter stadig på en gennembearbejdning og er kun nævnt i hovedtræk i denne arkivregistrant. En stor del af arkivalierne er indsamlet af tidligere modstandsmand og seminarierektor Palle Schmidt. Men indsamlingen er fortsat efter hans død i 1991, og HSB modtager hvert år – og med glæde – fra hele landet nyt materiale fra og om besættelsestiden. Således vil registranten løbende blive opdateret. Opbygning Arkivregistranten er bygget op om hovedgrupperne 01-60 med tilhørende undergrupper. Opdelingen i hovedgrupper er kronologisk/tematisk, suppleret af forsknings- og personarkiverne (Grupperne 50 og 60). Gruppeinddelingen kan ses umiddelbart nedenfor denne indledning. Med visse ændringer og tilføjelser følger opbygningen registranten for dokumentsamlingen på Frihedsmuseet i København – helt fra HSB’s grundlæggelse under Palle Schmidt har denne registrant udgjort et vigtigt ordningsinstrument på HSB. Søgning Det er en god ide at begynde med at gennemse gruppeinddelingen nedenfor. På den måde kan man orientere sig om arkivets opbygning. Derefter kan man gå direkte til de hoved- og undergrupper i selve arkivregistranten, man interesserer sig for. Vær opmærksom på, at der er overlap i mellem en del arkivgrupper.
    [Show full text]
  • Danish Victoria Cross Recipients
    DANISH VICTORIA CROSS RECIPIENTS ED EMERING During World War I and World War II four Danes were occasions in the face of intense fire and managed awarded the Victoria Cross (Figure 1). Their names and to rescue six of the wounded. For his bravery and a brief biography of each is given below. leadership, he was the first Dane to receive the Victoria Cross. He continued serving during World War I and World War II and was eventually promoted to Brigadier. His Victoria Cross, along with his other medals, is on display at the Imperial War Museum in London. He is buried at the Garrison Cemetery in Copenhagen. Figure 1: The Victoria Cross. Brigadier Percy Hansen, VC, DSO and Bar, MC, (1890- 1951) (Figure 2) was born in Durban, South Africa. At age 24, he found himself serving as a Captain in the 6th Battalion of the Lincolnshire Regiment at Gallipoli, Turkey. On August 9, 1915, his Battalion was forced to retreat in the face of a deliberately set bush fire, leaving Figure 3: Corporal Jorgen Christian Jensen, VC. several wounded members on the field and in danger of being burned to death. Captain Hansen, along with Corporal Jorgen Christian Jensen, VC, (1891-1922) some volunteers re-entered the battlefield on several (Figure 4), who was born in Logstor, Denmark and who later became a British subject, received his Victoria Cross for actions at Noreuil, France during April 1917. On April 2nd, along with five comrades, he attacked a German barricade and machine gun position, resulting in the death of one German and the surrender of 45 others.
    [Show full text]
  • Danish Cold War Historiography
    SURVEY ARTICLE Danish Cold War Historiography ✣ Rasmus Mariager This article reviews the scholarly debate that has developed since the 1970s on Denmark and the Cold War. Over the past three decades, Danish Cold War historiography has reached a volume and standard that merits international attention. Until the 1970s, almost no archive-based research had been con- ducted on Denmark and the Cold War. Beginning in the late 1970s, however, historians and political scientists began to assess Danish Cold War history. By the time an encyclopedia on Denmark and the Cold War was published in 2011, it included some 400 entries written by 70 researchers, the majority of them established scholars.1 The expanding body of literature has shown that Danish Cold War pol- icy possessed characteristics that were generally applicable, particularly with regard to alliance policy. As a small frontline state that shared naval borders with East Germany and Poland, Denmark found itself in a difficult situation in relation to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as well as the Soviet Union. With regard to NATO, Danish policymakers balanced policies of integration and screening. The Danish government had to assure the Soviet Union of Denmark’s and NATO’s peaceful intentions even as Denmark and NATO concurrently rearmed. The balancing act was not easily managed. A review of Danish Cold War historiography also has relevance for con- temporary developments within Danish politics and research. Over the past quarter century, Danish Cold War history has been remarkably politicized.2 The end of the Cold War has seen the successive publication of reports and white books on Danish Cold War history commissioned by the Dan- ish government.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • 555 the Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits Alex G. Oude
    The Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits Alex G. Oude Elferink* Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea, Utrecht University, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The Danish Straits are the main connection between the Baltic Sea and the world oceans. The regime of passage through these straits has been the subject of extensiveregulation, raising the question how different applicable instruments interact. Apart from applicable bilateral and multilateral treaties, it is necessaryto take into account the practice of Denmark and Swedenand other interested states, and regulatory activities within the framework of the IMO. The Case ConcerningPassage Through the Great Belt before the ICJ provides insights into the views of Denmark and Finland. The article concludesthat an 1857treaty excludesthe applicabilityof Part III of the LOS Convention to the straits, and that there are a number of difficultiesin assessingthe contents of the regimeof the straits. At the same time, these uncertaintiesdo not seem to have been a complicatingfactor for the adoption of measuresto regulate shipping traffic. Introduction The Danish Straits are the main connection between the Baltic Sea and the world oceans. The straits are of vital importance for the maritime communication of the Baltic states and squarely fall within the legal category of straits used for international navigation For a number of these states the Baltic Sea is the only outlet to the oceans (Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland). Although * An earlier version of this article was presented at the international conference, The Passage of Ships Through Straits, sponsored by the Defense Analyses Institute, Athens, 23 October 1999. The author wishes to thank the speakers and participants at that conference for the stimulating discussions, which assisted in preparing the final version of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Licenced Troubleshooter” James Bond As Assassin
    “A Licenced Troubleshooter” James Bond as Assassin ROGER PAULY If a pollster were to ask the average person on the street “What does James Bond do?” the response would almost certainly be that he is a spy. his is the most ba! sic defnition of the dashing British literary and "lm hero. But is it accurate? #o Bond$s activities represent spying or something else? %ecent studies have borne fruit by looking at the character of Bond outside of the basic parameters of the “spy” persona. &or example, )atharina *agen +,-./0 analysed Bond as a pirate; while #avid 2egram +,-./0 viewed him through the lens of an extreme athlete. 3f particular interest to this essay is Mathew edesco$s observation5 “6t7here$s no getting around it 8 James Bond is an assassin” +,--9( .,-0. edesco does not e'! plore this point in depth however( since his study is primarily devoted to the moral ethics of killing and torture. &urthermore, his characterisation of James Bond as an assassin is a decided anomaly in Bond scholarship and the spy classi! "cation remains predominant. &or example, Liisa &unnell and )laus #odds refer to Bond as a “British super spy” in a recent work +,-.;( ,.<0. his article will de! velop more fully edesco$s brief identi"cation by directly exploring the historical roots of Bond as an assassin. argeting key individuals for murder is an ancient and well-established el! ement of political and military history( and the Second World War was no e'cep! tion. In his capacity as an intelligence ofcer( Ian &leming had knowledge of ?l! Roger Pauly is /n Asso0i/*e Pro1essor o1 2is*or3 /* *he Uni5ersi*3 o1 ,en*r/l Ar6/ns/s% 2e is mos*ly 6nown 1or his 7or6 on *he his*or3 o1 1ire/rms bu* 4/s /lso wri**en on su('ec*s /s di5erse /s 8/r0us G/r5e39 8/u 8/u9 /n+ Mi- ami Vice% Volume 4 · Issue 1 · Spring 2021 ISSN 2514 21!" DOI$ 10%24"!!&'bs%)" Dis*ribu*ed under ,, -Y 4%0 U.
    [Show full text]