DOCSLIB.ORG

Conversation with 1St National Moot Court Competition Winners

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conversation with 1St National Moot Court Competition Winners Conversation with 1st National Moot Court Competition winners 1st National Moot Court Competition organized by Institute of law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra was held on 12th - 13th March, 2016 was based on The Juvenile Law. 38 teams from different law colleges perusing 5 year integrated law course or 3 year law across India participated in the competition. The National Moot Court Event was inaugurated by- Hon’ble justice R.K Jain, and the judges in the final round were- Justice Surya Kant Justice Raj Narain The valedictory session was presided by Honourable Justice K. G. Balakrishanan. The pre-rounds, quarter finals, semi-final rounds were judged by Senior Advocates of various High Courts, esteemed faculty members of different law colleges and NLUs, CJMs, etc. The finale round of the 1st National Moot Court Competition organized by Institute of law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra held on 13th March, 2016 was won by the team of Delhi Metropolitan Education, GGSIPU, New Delhi. The winning team comprising:- Damini Bisht Azka Sheikh Kalia Harshit Dave The Best Mooter was awarded to Raavi Shukla of Chanakya National Law University, Patna The Best Researcher was awarded to Kamesh Vedula of Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi. The Best Memorial was awarded to UILS, Punjab University, Chandigarh. The team comprised of- Divya Anshul Singhal Priya Gupta The following is an interview of the Delhi Metropolitan Education, GGSIPU, New Delhi team which won the 1st National Moot Court Competition organized by Institute of law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra held on 12th - 13th March, 2016. Page 1 The winning team comprising:- Damini Bisht Azka Sheikh Kalia Harshit Dave IN SESSION: Hello Guys, first of all Congratulations on your splendid victory! Winning a moot is esteemed moment... To recapture it we want to conduct an interview, it will take only a few moments. 1. What made you choose this present moot in the first place? Damini Bisht: Hey! Thank You so much! The moot problem was based on the juvenile law, criminal law and International law. The criminal law and international law is my field of interest. I still remember after the amendment of the juvenile law three of us were arguing and debating in the canteen whether it is wrong or right. I think the idea behind doing this moot was to present those arguments in front of the people. Azka Sheikh Kalia: This moot had the preposition regarding the Juvenile Justice Act. The Juvenile Act was new to us, until now. If you don’t know a particular Act, then you must do moot on it. That’s what I did. Harshit Dave: We read the moot proposition and since it was based on a new statute we found it to be a very intriguing one. Also, there were other laws such as Criminal law and International Law and Constitutional Law which were involved in this proposition. This made the moot proposition a riveting one. We also had a keen interest in the Juvenile Law. Also, the Institute of Law, Kurukshetra University is a very prestigious institution and hence we chose this moot. 2) The moot proposition was based on new Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, what you felt about the moot proposition? Damini: The moot proposition was undoubtedly a very tricky one. It was based on the new Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and was an intriguing one. We read the proposition numerous times and every Page 2 time we came up with a new fact related to our arguments. We understood all the facts in depth and then framed our arguments. Azka Sheikh Kalia: The moot preposition was beautifully drafted. It hits on the sweet spot of the new amendment regarding lowering the age bar from 18 to 16 years in case of heinous offences. My area of expertise was criminal law and ossification test. Harshit Dave: The moot problem was beautifully drafted every single loophole of the law was pertinent to the case. The issues were overlapping and sometimes they were contradicting each other and we didn’t want to contradict ourselves or to sound repetitive. We spend a lot of time scrutinizing the moot problem but every time we read it a new fact would emerge. The moot proposition was one of the factor that attracted us to do this moot. 3) What was your strategy behind preparation? How did you kept the balance and managed both your college schedule & moot related research work in drafting of memorials and oral arguments? Damini: The strategy behind preparation was not killing each other before the whole moot gets over. Just kidding, the only thing that we had during the whole time in our minds was to win this moot. The moot problem released and we divided our work. We used to attend all the classes during the day ( as our college is very strict with attendance things) and after that we used to spend a lot of time in library, computer lab and even on staircase. It’s like for the one month the college premises became our first home. All the moot work that we did was during the 4:00 p.m to 4:00 a.m, thankfully all three of us has the same habit of working in the late nights. From the starting itself we divided our work and made it clear as to who has to work on which part. One week before submission of the memorials we had our exams, that was one hell of a week. We used to come early in the college study for like 2-3 hours together give our exam and then run towards the library to work on the memorials. For that one week I don’t know for which trip my sleep and food went for. We didn’t get much time to prepare for orals, during the time we were travelling from Delhi to Kurukshetra University in the bus we were preparing our orals and everyone in the bus was staring at us :-P , but we became so badass at that time that we didn’t even care about anything and our main focus was only on to make our orals strong we made a list of all the possible questions that can be Page 3 asked during the arguments, we made sure that our arguments finished at the right time so that we have time to answer the questions raised by the judges. Azka: There was only one strategy which was, to win. We always keep it simple, in college hours we do nothing except of college work. Late nights are made for doing work of such kind of work. It’s more of a habit you can say. Harshit: The strategy was simple. However, the preparation was a very hectic and a time consuming one. We really had to strike a balance between our academics and the preparation of this moot. We discussed the moot problem over and over again. Then, we worked on the arguments and counter-arguments. The research was very extensive because right from the start we believed that research is the backbone for every moot. We researched on every argument extensively. Also, we are very thankful to our teachers who really guided us at every step of the preparation. 4. Team work makes the dream work. How important you feel the essence of team effort during preparations? Were there any roadblocks? Damini: We call ourselves “The Dream Team”. I think I couldn’t have asked for the better team, three of us are from the same batch and we know each other very well, the best part is that we understand each other’s working pattern. You cannot win the moot court competition on your own it always has to be the team effort. I am the person who jokes around all the time, yell at everyone and works best under the pressure. My team used to make me sit quietly and treat me like a small kid. Obviously every team has conflicts and different opinions, when three minds meet together they will have contradicting views but that’s what the best because this made us understand each other more. The one perfect thing about our team is that we don’t fall apart. We fight but when we are fighting one of us take a step back and try to solve the issues. There were no as such roadblocks and even though we had some we removed them by our efforts and we did what we decided to do when we registered for this moot court and that is “Winning”. Azka: Ours is a “Dream Team”. The work gets divided like a piece of cake and everyone knows there part from the start. Hence, zero possibility of conflict. No roadblocks as such. No two fingers are same and no two opinions are either. There tends to be conflict between two opinions. However, Page 4 the best part about our team is we don’t fall apart. When two member shares conflict then, the third member becomes the mediator. Harshit: That statement is indeed true to the core. Team effort is one of the major factors in mooting. Each one of us knew what we had to do and there was no misunderstanding between us. We all were on the same page. The reason why we won this moot was because the unity, respect and faith we have for each other in our team. The only reason why we didn’t face any roadblocks as such was due to the level of understanding between us. 5. Well, 38 teams in the 1st National, what do you felt about the competition and which was the round you enjoyed the most? Damini: The competition was really tough and just like our team all the teams have prepared very well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra
    Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of technology Kurukshetra No/MED/2016/ Dated: 05.01.2016 NOTICE Date & Time of Written Test Jan 24, 2016 (Sunday) 11:00 AM Reporting Time for Attendance Jan 24, 2016 (Sunday) 10:00 AM Venue Mechanical Engineering Department Utmost care has been taken by the screening committee while checking the eligibility of the candidates based on the information supplied by them in their application forms and the criteria mentioned in the PhD prospectus of the institute for the admission in Mechanical Engineering Department for the session beginning from January 2016. The eligible candidates as per the attached list are allowed to appear in the written test. All the candidates who have not submitted Guide Consent/NOC they may submit Guide Consent/NOC at Mechanical Dept. Office on or before 18.01.2016, failure which they will be considered ineligible and not allowed to appear in the written test. Head of Department Mechanical Engineering Prof In charge (CCN) is requested to upload this notice along with the list of applicants finalized by the committee. Enclosed; PDF file of this letter and the list of eligible applicants. Prof In-charge (CCN) Updated List of PhD Applicants Sl. Name of Candidate Father/Husband PhD Marks/University Experience NOC Guide Remarks No. Name Program B.Tech University M.Tech University Consent 1 PRAVEEN T R Ramachandraian B FULL 61.42 VTU 80.13 Bangalore NA NA NO Not Eligible University Guide Consent 2 MOHAMMAD UMAIR Mohammad FULL 69.80 UPTU 69.80 UPTU NA NA YES Eligible
    [Show full text]
  • Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak Alumni
    MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY ROHTAK ALUMNI DIRECTORY missing your old friends.. meet them here... MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY ALUMNI OFFICE M. D. UNIVERSITY, Rohtak - 124001 (Haryana) www.mdurohtak.ac.in MDU ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OFFICE BEARERS President (Ex-officio) Prof. R.P. Hooda, Vice – Chancellor, M.D. University, Rohtak Vice President Secretary Joint Secrtary-cum-Treasurer Director, MDU Alumni (Ex-officio) Prof. S.P.S. Dahiya, Prof. K.P.S. Mahalwar, Prof. (Mrs.) Asha Kadiyan, Prof. Nasib Singh Gill, Head, Dept. of English & Foreign Languages, Dept. of Law, Dept. of Eng. & Foreign Languages, Dept. of Comp. Sci. & Applications, M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak M.D. University, Rohtak EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Prof. Narender Kumar Garg Dr. H.J. Ghosh Roy Dr. M.S. Chaudhary Dr. (Mrs.) Sanju Nanda Dr.(Mrs.) Shalini Singh Head, Dept. of Commerce, Professor, IMSAR, Ex-Director, Maharaja Associate Professor, Associate Professor, M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak Suraj Mal Institute Dept. of Pharmaceutical Science, Dept. of Psychology, M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak Dr. Surinder Sharma Mr. Jagbir Singh Rathee Dr. Dinesh Gabba Mr. Atul Jain Associate Professor in History, Director, Youth Welfare, Associate Prof. in Commerce, Director, Malabar Vaish College, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak Govt. College, Bhiwani Healthcare Centre, Rohtak MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY 2 l HARYANA RAJ BHAVAN, CHANDIGARH. MESSAGE I am happy to know that Maharshi Dyanand University, Rohtak is organizing its 2nd Alumni Meet on February 12, 2012 and a Alumni Directory is being published on the occasion. The Educational Institutions are the temples of knowledge which make a nation healthy, wealthy and wise.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Office(S) Telephone Directory of Public Health Engineering Deptt., Haryana As On: 01/09/2021
    Field Office(s) Telephone Directory of Public Health Engineering Deptt., Haryana as on: 30/09/2021 Office Name Person Name Mobile No. Desig. E-Mail Address Tel. No. (O) Tel. No. (R) Ambala Circle Sh. Ashok Sharma 9416553553 SE [email protected] 0171-2601273 01746-235123 Ambala City PHED Sh.Dinesh Gaba 8295707076 EE [email protected] 0171-2521121 Ambala PHED Sh. Anil Kumar 9728286963 EE [email protected] 0171-2601208 Naraingarh PHED Sh. Sameer Sharma 8901267711 EE [email protected] 01734-284095 01734-287681 Panchkula PHED Sh.Vikas Lathar 9416997066 EE [email protected] 01733-253157 Yamuna Nagar PHED No. 1 Sh. Parik Garg 9729265648 EE [email protected] 01732-266050 Yamuna Nagar PHED No. 2 Sh.Sumit Garg 8059530576 EE [email protected] 01732-237826 Ambala Mech. Circle Sh.Nishi Pal 9812998197 SE [email protected] 0171-2601727 Ambala Cantt. (M) PHED Sh.Rajesh Sharma 9466693637 EE [email protected] 0171-2631402 Rewari (GWI) PHED Sh.Rajesh Sharma 9466693637 EE [email protected] 01274-260344 Sonipat Mech. PHED Sh.B.S.Hooda (Add. Charge) 9468483200 EE [email protected] Bhiwani Circle Sh. Jaswant Singh 9466155801 SE [email protected] 01664-242021 Bhiwani PHED No. 1 Sh.Sunil Ranga 9416510884 EE [email protected] 01664-242004 Bhiwani PHED No. 2 Sh. Parmod Kumar 9306500986 EE [email protected] 01664-242002 01276242976 Charkhi Dadri PHED Sh. Dalbir Dalal (Addi. Charge) 9466603272 EE [email protected] 01250-220150 Siwani PHED Sh.Rahul Berwal 9050223303 EE [email protected] 01255-277066 Tosham PHED Sh.Dalbir Dalal 9466603272 EE [email protected] 01253-258774 01250-220846 Gurugram Circle Sh.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitration Matters - Slps Challenging Arbitration Matters
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 04-03-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE:- REQUEST FOR ‘ NOT TO DELETE A MATTER’, SHALL BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE MENTIONING OFFICER. ALL CIRCULATIONS ( IF THE MATTERS ARE NOT ON BOARD FOR THE DAY ) NEED NOT BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE BENCH AND THE SAME SHALL BE HANDED OVER TO THE CONCERNED COURT MASTERS IN ADVANCE BEFORE 10.30 A.M. THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 1.00 P.M. REGULAR HEARING Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters 101 C.A. No. 166/2017 BHAGWAN SINGH SUBHRO SANYAL XVI Versus M.D. CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORP . AND ANR. P. NARASIMHAN Appeal Against Orders Of Statutory Bodies - Appeals and other matters U/Ss 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 102 C.A. No. BIDHYADHAR RUCHI KOHLI 1122-1123/2013 XVII Versus UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4] Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters 103 C.A. No. 10118/2013 SECUR INDUSTRIES LTD. RUPESH KUMAR III-A Versus GODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. T. MAHIPAL Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking - Matters relating to Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Reinforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Punjab and Haryana Chandigarh ANNUAL REPORT 2012
    ANNUAL REPORT 2012 High Court of Punjab and Haryana Chandigarh Annual Report 2012 1 Acknowledgement This compilation would not have been possible without the valuable inputs given by the Registry. Sh. Surinder Gupta, Registrar General and Sh. Shekhar Kumar Dhawan, Registrar (Vigilance) showed keen Editorial Board: interest to make available the relevant data. Sh. Harnam Singh, Registrar (Admn.), Sh. K.K. Kareer, Registrar (Recruitment), Sh. Justice K. Kannan Surya Partap Singh, Principal Secretary to the Chief Justice-cum- Justice Rajiv Narain Raina Registrar, Sh. Karunesh Kumar, Registrar (Rules), Sh. Sunil Kumar Justice S.P. Bangarh Chaudhary, Registrar (Judicial), Sh. Ravi Kumar, OSD (Vigilance) Haryana, Sh. M.P.S. Pahwa, OSD (Vigilance) Punjab and Sh. Puneet Mohan Sharma , OSD (Recruitment) also assisted the committee substantially in our work. The inputs furnished by Director (Admn.) Chandigarh Judicial Academy, Member Secretaries, State Legal Services Authorities helped immensely in giving shape to the report. Strenuous efforts of Ms. Jaishree Thakur, Advocate, Editor, ILR also require special mention which helped in compiling the chapter „March of Law‟. We extend our gratitude to all the officials of this Court especially Sh. Mukesh Sharma, Superintendent, who whole heartedly devoted themselves in helping us with all information to make this report comprehensive. Having acknowledged the valuable contributions in preparation of this Annual Report, we deem it our duty to own responsibility for any Designed & Compiled by: mistakes, errors or omissions. Sh. Tarsem Mangla, Registrar (Computerization) Editorial Board Sh. Ravdeep Singh Hundal, OSD Sh. Rajwant Singh, Court Manager Annual Report 2012 2 Annual Report 2012 3 C Part A Page Introduction 2 From the Desk of the Chief Justice 4 Judges 7 The Bar 31 March of Law 2012 35 Statistics 53 Part B Legal Services Authorities:Punjab, Haryana & U.T.
    [Show full text]
  • For Judgement
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 08-12-2020 Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE:- BY : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA SUPPLEMENTARY LIST Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate FOR JUDGEMENT 1501 C.A. No. 5650/2010 DAULAT SINGH (D) THR. LRS. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH XV BHATI[P-1] Versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3] [ HEARD BY HON'BLE N.V. RAMANA, HON'BLE S. ABDUL NAZEER AND HON'BLE SURYA KANT,JJ. ] NEW DELHI 07-12-2020 17:03:16 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 08-12-2020 Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE:- BY : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT SUPPLEMENTARY LIST Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate FOR JUDGEMENT 1502 SLP(C) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Upload-361054.Pdf
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 154/2019 RAJEEV KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondent(s) Date : 24-05-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Suhaan Mukerji,Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Singh,Adv. Ms. Nupur Kumar,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Manchanda,Adv. Ms. Kajal Dalal,Adv. Mr. Prastut Dalvi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India cannot be said to be maintainable as the petitioner has also filed an application for extension of time before this Court. A bench of Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, on 17.05.2019, has passed an order, which is at page Nos.155-162 of this petition. In view of the aforesaid, a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India should not have been filed. Be that as it may, since it is open to the petitioner to approach the concerned Court, as the Courts in the State of West Bengal are functioning, appear in person and seek the remedy before the concerned Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India
    TO BE PUBLISHED IN PART III SECTION I OF THE GAZETTE OF INDIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA F.No.44/V. Judges/2019/SCA(Genl.) Dated the 24th May, 2019 NOTIFICATION In continuation of and in furtherance to the Notification of even number dated 9.5.2019 notifying the composition and sitting of the Division Benches during the Summer Vacation of the Supreme Court of India from Monday, 13th May, 2019 to Sunday, 30th June, 2019 (both days inclusive), it is hereby notified that following Division Benches, have been reconstituted/constituted by Hon©ble the Chief Justice of India, for the period indicated against each of them : THIRD BENCH OF FIRST PART OF VACATION (25.05.2019 TO 28.05.2019) Division Name of the Hon©ble Judges Bench 1. Hon©ble the Chief Justice And Hon©ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose 2. Hon©ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah And Hon©ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna FIRST BENCH OF SECOND PART OF VACATION (29.05.2019 TO 30.05.2019) Division Name of the Hon©ble Judges Bench 1. Hon©ble the Chief Justice And Hon©ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose 2. Hon©ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah And Hon©ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna Contd... -2- SECOND BENCH OF SECOND PART OF VACATION (31.05.2019 TO 02.06.2019) Division Name of the Hon©ble Judges Bench 3. Hon©ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah And Hon©ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna THIRD BENCH OF SECOND PART OF VACATION (03.06.2019 TO 05.06.2019) Division Name of the Hon©ble Judges Bench 4 Hon©ble Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Against Orders of Statutory Bodies - Appeals and Other Matters U/Ss 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 05-03-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE:- REQUEST FOR ‘ NOT TO DELETE A MATTER’, SHALL BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE MENTIONING OFFICER ALL CIRCULATIONS ( IF THE MATTERS ARE NOT ON BOARD FOR THE DAY ) NEED NOT BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE BENCH AND THE SAME SHALL BE HANDED OVER TO THE CONCERNED COURT MASTERS IN ADVANCE BEFORE 10.30 A.M. THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 1.00 P.M. REGULAR HEARING Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate Appeal Against Orders Of Statutory Bodies - Appeals and other matters U/Ss 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 101 C.A. No. BIDHYADHAR RUCHI KOHLI 1122-1123/2013 XVII Versus UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4] NEW DELHI 04-03-2020 17:13:39 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 05-03-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Return 2019-20
    FORM NO. MGT-7 Annual Return [Pursuant to sub-Section(1) of section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 and sub-rule (1) of rule 11of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014] Form language English Hindi Refer the instruction kit for filing the form. I. REGISTRATION AND OTHER DETAILS (i) * Corporate Identification Number (CIN) of the company Pre-fill Global Location Number (GLN) of the company * Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the company (ii) (a) Name of the company (b) Registered office address (c) *e-mail ID of the company (d) *Telephone number with STD code (e) Website (iii) Date of Incorporation (iv) Type of the Company Category of the Company Sub-category of the Company (v) Whether company is having share capital Yes No (vi) *Whether shares listed on recognized Stock Exchange(s) Yes No (b) CIN of the Registrar and Transfer Agent Pre-fill Name of the Registrar and Transfer Agent Page 1 of 15 Registered office address of the Registrar and Transfer Agents (vii) *Financial year From date 01/04/2019 (DD/MM/YYYY) To date 31/03/2020 (DD/MM/YYYY) (viii) *Whether Annual general meeting (AGM) held Yes No (a) If yes, date of AGM 30/09/2020 (b) Due date of AGM 30/09/2020 (c) Whether any extension for AGM granted Yes No II. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPANY *Number of business activities 1 S.No Main Description of Main Activity group Business Description of Business Activity % of turnover Activity Activity of the group code Code company G G2 III. PARTICULARS OF HOLDING, SUBSIDIARY AND ASSOCIATE COMPANIES (INCLUDING JOINT VENTURES) *No.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 | I
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 | I ANNUAL REPORT 2014 II | ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The compilation of this Report would not have been possible without valuable inputs and hard work of officers of the Registry who have designed and compiled it. Information contributed by Director (Admn.) Chandigarh Judicial Academy, Member Secretaries, State Legal Services Authorities has immensely helped in giving shape to the report. Officials from Exclusive and Computer Cells devoted themselves wholeheartedly while collecting data from various quarters and branches and typesetting the same. We also acknowledge the contribution made by Sh. Jaskiran Singh, Office Executive, Chandigarh Judicial Academy, who took photographs which are part of the present Report. The name of Sh. Vikas Suri, Reporter ILR needs special mention who made strenuous efforts for compiling important judgments of this Court which have been included in the chapter - March of Law. Having acknowledged the valuable contributions in preparation of this Annual Report, we deem it our duty to own responsibility for any mistake, error or omission. Editorial Board: Justice M. Jeyapaul Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu Justice Lisa Gill Justice Dr. Shekhar Dhawan Designed & Compiled by: Sh. Parmod Goyal, Registrar (Computerization) Sh. Shatin Goyal, OSD (Rules & Protocol) Sh. Ravdeep Singh Hundal, OSD (Gaz. II) ANNUAL REPORT 2014 | III PUBLISHED BY High Court of Punjab and Haryana IV | ANNUAL REPORT 2014 VISION & MISSION To uphold the rule of law and constitutional values. To establish an effective and efficient judicial system in the States of Punjab, Haryana & U.T. Chandigarh. To enhance public trust and confidence in judicial system. To provide expeditious and cost effective redressal of legal rights to the satisfaction of litigant.
    [Show full text]
  • Latestlaws.Com
    LatestLaws.com SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Re: Filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court. Against the sanctioned strength of 31 Judges, the Supreme Court of India is presently functioning with 27 Judges, leaving 04 clear vacancies. Two of these vacancies would be filled up in terms of the recommendation made by this Collegium on 12th April, 2019 for appointment of two Judges in the Supreme Court, which, however, having been referred back is pending consideration before this Collegium. The Collegium extensively deliberated and discussed names of Chief Justices and senior puisne High Court Judges eligible for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court. The Collegium considers that the following two persons are deserving and suitable in all respects for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India: 1. Mr. Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Judge, Bombay High Court, and 2. Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Chief Justice, Himachal Pradesh High Court (PHC: Punjab & Haryana). In terms of the Memorandum of Procedure, we have consulted our colleagues, whose opinion is considered to be significant in adjudging the suitability of the above-named recommendees for elevation to the Supreme Court. Copies of letters of opinion of our colleagues received in this regard are placed below. While recommending the names of Mr. Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai and Mr. Justice Surya Kant, the Collegium has LatestLaws.com taken into consideration combined seniority on all-India basis of Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts, apart from their competence, conduct and integrity. The Collegium has also kept in mind the desirability of giving due representation on the Bench of the Supreme Court, as far as possible, to all the High Courts as well as to all sections of the society including those belonging to SC/ST/OBC categories, women and minorities.
    [Show full text]