DOCSLIB.ORG

High Court of Punjab and Haryana Chandigarh ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Court of Punjab and Haryana Chandigarh ANNUAL REPORT 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 2012 High Court of Punjab and Haryana Chandigarh Annual Report 2012 1 Acknowledgement This compilation would not have been possible without the valuable inputs given by the Registry. Sh. Surinder Gupta, Registrar General and Sh. Shekhar Kumar Dhawan, Registrar (Vigilance) showed keen Editorial Board: interest to make available the relevant data. Sh. Harnam Singh, Registrar (Admn.), Sh. K.K. Kareer, Registrar (Recruitment), Sh. Justice K. Kannan Surya Partap Singh, Principal Secretary to the Chief Justice-cum- Justice Rajiv Narain Raina Registrar, Sh. Karunesh Kumar, Registrar (Rules), Sh. Sunil Kumar Justice S.P. Bangarh Chaudhary, Registrar (Judicial), Sh. Ravi Kumar, OSD (Vigilance) Haryana, Sh. M.P.S. Pahwa, OSD (Vigilance) Punjab and Sh. Puneet Mohan Sharma , OSD (Recruitment) also assisted the committee substantially in our work. The inputs furnished by Director (Admn.) Chandigarh Judicial Academy, Member Secretaries, State Legal Services Authorities helped immensely in giving shape to the report. Strenuous efforts of Ms. Jaishree Thakur, Advocate, Editor, ILR also require special mention which helped in compiling the chapter „March of Law‟. We extend our gratitude to all the officials of this Court especially Sh. Mukesh Sharma, Superintendent, who whole heartedly devoted themselves in helping us with all information to make this report comprehensive. Having acknowledged the valuable contributions in preparation of this Annual Report, we deem it our duty to own responsibility for any Designed & Compiled by: mistakes, errors or omissions. Sh. Tarsem Mangla, Registrar (Computerization) Editorial Board Sh. Ravdeep Singh Hundal, OSD Sh. Rajwant Singh, Court Manager Annual Report 2012 2 Annual Report 2012 3 C Part A Page Introduction 2 From the Desk of the Chief Justice 4 Judges 7 The Bar 31 March of Law 2012 35 Statistics 53 Part B Legal Services Authorities:Punjab, Haryana & U.T. Chandigarh 63 Mediation & Conciliation 82 Lok Adalat 94 Judicial Academy 97 Part C Registry 103 I.T. Initiatives 106 Recruitment 120 Library 127 Infrastructure Development 130 Budget 138 Miscellaneous Initiatives 139 Annual Report 2012 4 Part A Annual Report 2012 5 Introduction A High Court website that functions such as receiving case papers, features full text of judgments, cause- listing dates for hearing; from a sizeable list of cases posted daily, various events number of lawyers, who advocate for and notifications for recruitment of staff, the causes of litigants to the dignified already provides much of the class of Judges that adjudicate on every information of what the legal community issue that is brought to a Court, the could be looking for. If one must, judicial machinery is mammoth. All its therefore, look for justification for functioning is geared towards its making a report of the Court's ultimate product, dispensation of justice. functioning in all its diverse jurisdictions, Every case that finds its utterance both judicial and administrative, then it through a Judge's disposition is the should be seen only in a new paradigm result of a coordinated effort by a of the information age of declaring the countless number of persons. However, court‟s performance without demand the institution is under constant stress and bringing to a reader more than and its performance is not at all times a what the Right to Information Act favoured topic of adulation but subject makes necessary. of vitriolic criticism. One does not need The judiciary is the bulwark of to be cynical but the fact is that the vibrant democracy in action and judiciary is always judged by how there occupies a pivotal role in the are still crores of cases that are waiting constitutional scheme of bringing to to be cleared. One hardly ever discusses fruition what, we the people of India the prodigious output that is churned have solemnly resolved to secure for out by constant judicial lucubration. An ourselves. From the magnificent objective assessment of the functioning constructions and infrastructure to the of the judiciary is never fully redeemed. large population of staff minding various Here then is the attempt to present Annual Report 2012 2 every bit of information that is normally public interest is kindled by what the cocooned from public domain. press feeds the public on. One may not The report of the year 2012 is an miss certain amount of sensationalism in endeavour to bring a performance audit all such journalistic news but they do of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in little justice to giving an idea of how the all its facets. The effort is not unique in Court actually performs. Some Courts any sense, for in several foreign have released sporadic reports but jurisdictions, there are legal mandates perhaps, what is needed is a for such disclosures. If there are law commitment to release them year after journals reporting judgments, they are year without fail. We believe that this accessed only by persons trained in law will be a harbinger to a new beginning: such as lawyers, academicians and a practice that must find approval from students, apart from litigants many more Courts. This report features themselves, who get to read the everything that you might like to know. particular judgments that the Courts Try us to ask what this report does not have decided in their own disputes. The yet give! Annual Report 2012 3 From the Desk of the Chief Justice It gives me immense pleasure in presenting this Annual Report for the year 2012 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. This Court was inaugurated by the First Prime Minister of India Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru on 19th March, 1955. During the last 58 years this Court has achieved many states will probably be the milestones. It has produced many stalwarts in legal first in the country, who profession and umpteen numbers of Judges of High Court of are able to fulfill this high calibre, many of whom have adorned the highest court dream of the Hon‟ble Chief of this country and brought laurels to this august institution. Justice of India. Strength Many commendable achievements of this Court, however, of the Judicial Officers has have gone un-noticed in the absence of proper also been increased documentation thereof. It is for this reason that this humble considerably and the beginning is made with an idea to prepare Annual Report, Courts which were over- every year now onwards, depicting comprehensive Report burdened in the past, have Card of this Court. been made efficient by The compilation of Annual Report highlights the proper distribution of work working & functioning of this Court on the judicial & in such a manner that now administrative aspects of administration of justice. The the work is being handled purpose of this Annual Report is to bring to the notice of all by the Presiding Officers, the stake holders, including general masses, the activities with quiet ease & being undertaken by this Court. convenience. This Court is taking steps for delivery of speedy In addition to the justice to the litigants by minimizing delay in decision of above, efforts have also cases. In the preceding years, number of steps were taken to been made to minimize curtail delay in disposal of cases and it has yielded fruitful problems being faced by results. The achievement in this direction is phenomenal. the litigants. Apart from The district courts in the states of Punjab & Haryana as well streamlining the working as Union Territory, Chandigarh have set a goal for of the subordinate themselves to wipe out the pendency of more than five years Judiciary as well as the old cases by the end of March-2014. If successful, these High Court, which is a Annual Report 2012 4 continuous process, steps have also been taken to bring Registry of this Court as justice at the door steps of the rural people by establishing well as Judicial Officers regular Courts at Sub Divisions and opening Gram Nyayalays and staff of District Courts, at other remote places. Now a litigant need not travel more all of whom are making than 15-20 Kms. to knock at the door of a court. Legal significant contribution to Services Authorities of the two States & Union Territory are streamline the working of doing exemplary work. Likewise, to resolve disputes amicably the Courts. at pre-litigative stage as well as during pendency, Mediation My appreciations are also movement is given desired momentum. due to the Editorial Board As we know that in India large population is as well as the team of the not aware of its rights and, if aware, is unable to approach officers who have the Courts for protection of their rights because of poverty. designed and compiled the Therefore, communications received from individuals or present report in a record NGOs seeking protection for the down troddens or raising time. other issues concerning interests of the society at large are being entertained as Public Interest Litigations for providing justice to the under privileged. On this occasion I would like to forward my best wishes to the Hon‟ble Judges, Officers and officials of the (A.K. Sikri) Annual Report 2012 5 Annual Report 2012 6 Judges Punjab and Haryana High Court is a common High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana and Union territory of Chandigarh. It is situated at Chandigarh, the capital of the States of Punjab and Haryana. During the year 2012 the total working strength of the Judges in the High Court was 43 against the sanctioned strength of 68. Judges of High Court of Punjab and Haryana Name Term of Office* The Chief Justice 1. Justice A.K. Sikri 06.03.2016 The Judges 2. Justice Jasbir Singh 31.07.2014 3. Justice S.K.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Late Colonial India: 1942-1944
    Rohit De ([email protected]) LEGS Seminar, March 2009 Draft. Please do not cite, quote, or circulate without permission. EMASCULATING THE EXECUTIVE: THE FEDERAL COURT AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN LATE COLONIAL INDIA: 1942-1944 Rohit De1 On the 7th of September, 1944 the Chief Secretary of Bengal wrote an agitated letter to Leo Amery, the Secretary of State for India, complaining that recent decisions of the Federal Court were bringing the governance of the province to a standstill. “In war condition, such emasculation of the executive is intolerable”, he thundered2. It is the nature and the reasons for this “emasculation” that the paper hopes to uncover. This paper focuses on a series of confrontations between the colonial state and the colonial judiciary during the years 1942 to 1944 when the newly established Federal Court struck down a number of emergency wartime legislations. The courts decisions were unexpected and took both the colonial officials and the Indian public by surprise, particularly because the courts in Britain had upheld the legality of identical legislation during the same period. I hope use this episode to revisit the discussion on the rule of law in colonial India as well as literature on judicial behavior. Despite the prominence of this confrontation in the public consciousness of the 1940’s, its role has been downplayed in both historical and legal accounts. As I hope to show this is a result of a disciplinary divide in the historical engagement with law and legal institutions. Legal scholarship has defined the field of legal history as largely an account of constitutional and administrative developments paralleling political developments3.
    [Show full text]
  • CHENNAI IAS ACADEMY –Vellore / 9043211 311/411
    www.Padasalai.Net www.TrbTnpsc.com CHENNAI IAS ACADEMY –Vellore / 9043211 311/411 CHENNAI IAS ACADEMY Vellore TNPSC www.Padasalai.NetGROUP – I, I,II,IIA,IV Prelims & Mains POLITY 5 YEARS PREVIOUS QUESTIONS with key answers # 5, old by-Pass Road, National Theatre ( Near- opp - Benzz Park ) Vellore- 4 Website : WWW.Chennaiiasacademy.com Facebook : chennaiiasacademy vellore : www.Chennaiiasacademy.com / : chennaiiasacademyvellore http://www.trbtnpsc.com/2013/09/tnpsc-group-2-group-4-vao-exam-study.html www.Padasalai.Net www.TrbTnpsc.com CHENNAI IAS ACADEMY –Vellore / 9043211 311/411 TNPSC - GROUP - I PRELIMS – 2011 PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTIONS POLITY 1. Which Article of the constitution of India gives provision to set up Panchayat? A) Article 15 B) Article 25 C) Article 243 D) Article 42. 2. Grants-in-aid to the states by the centre are provided with the objective of. A) Augmenting financial resources of the states. B) Maintaining smooth centre-State relation. C) Ensuring stable government at the centre. D) All of these 3. In which year seats were reserved for women in local bodies in Tamil Nadu? 1991 B) 1951 C) 1994 D) 2010 4. The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act was passed during the period of. A) Rajiv Gandhi B) A.B. Vajpayee C) V.P. Singh D) Narasimha Rao 5. Which guarantees rights to freedom of religion to all persons in all its aspects? A) Articles 25 to 28 B) Article 29 C) Article 30 D) Article 34 6. As per the division of powers of India, in the concurrent list there are. A) 47 items B) 66 items C) 97 items D) 77 items 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 06-03-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) 42.1 Connected SLP(C) No. 18834/2019 III KUMHO PETROCHEMICALS CO. LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[CAVEAT] IA No. 106384/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 112648/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES 42.2 Connected SLP(C) No. 2470/2020 III DESIGNATED AUTHORITY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF TRADE REMEDY AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR Versus NOCIL LTD PRAVEENA GAUTAM[CAVEAT] FOR FOR impleading party ON IA 24730/2020 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 24730/2020 IA No. 180548/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 24730/2020 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT COURT NO. : 6 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN (TIME : 10:30 AM) 51 SLP(Crl) No. 10750/2019 II UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus SADDAM KHAN YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-1] 51.1 Connected SLP(Crl) No. 10751/2019 II UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus UNNAS KHAN YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-1] COURT NO. : 7 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 9 Diary No.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Newsletter for the Month of March,2021
    MAY 2016 MARCH 2021 CJA CJA e - N EWSLE TTER Monthly Newsletter of Chandigarh Judicial Academy of Punjab & Haryana High Court For circulation among the stakeholders in Judicial Education FROM THE DESK OF CHIEF EDITOR VOLUME : 06 The Madhya Pradesh State Judicial Academy organized: ―All India State ISSUE : 03 Judicial Academies Director‘s Retreat‖ on 6-7 March, 2021 at Jabalpur. The objective of the Retreat was to provide a platform to all the state judicial academies (SJAs) across the country. This was to deliberate upon diverse themes of judicial education and training. The purpose was In this Issue: to share the best practices prevalent amongst SJAs. The goal was, how From the Desk of Chief Editor to achieve judicial excellence. The Retreat was inaugurated by Hon‘ble Latest Cases: Civil the President of India Sh.Ram Nath Kovind. The Hon‘ble Chief Justice of Latest Cases: Criminal Latest Cases: Family Law India, Justice S.A.Bobde also addressed. Hon‘ble Justices, Justice Events & Forthcoming N.V.Ramana, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice Hemant Gupta and Event Notification Justice S.Ravindra Bhat of the Supreme Court attended and participated in the Retreat. Hon‘ble Chief Justices of High Courts of Madhya Pradesh, Patna, Karnataka, Meghalaya, Bombay and Jammu & Kashmir also participated. The Chairmen/ Presidents/Judges In-charge and Directors of SJAs were part of the Retreat. Chandigarh Judicial Academy was represented by Hon‘ble Mr.Justice T.S.Dhindsa, President, BOG, CJA, Director (Academics), Dr.Balram K Gupta and Editorial Board Director (Administration), Ms.Shalini Singh Nagpal. HMJ Tejinder Singh Dhindsa Editor–in-Chief The entire programme was structured in five plenary sessions besides Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversation with 1St National Moot Court Competition Winners
    Conversation with 1st National Moot Court Competition winners 1st National Moot Court Competition organized by Institute of law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra was held on 12th - 13th March, 2016 was based on The Juvenile Law. 38 teams from different law colleges perusing 5 year integrated law course or 3 year law across India participated in the competition. The National Moot Court Event was inaugurated by- Hon’ble justice R.K Jain, and the judges in the final round were- Justice Surya Kant Justice Raj Narain The valedictory session was presided by Honourable Justice K. G. Balakrishanan. The pre-rounds, quarter finals, semi-final rounds were judged by Senior Advocates of various High Courts, esteemed faculty members of different law colleges and NLUs, CJMs, etc. The finale round of the 1st National Moot Court Competition organized by Institute of law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra held on 13th March, 2016 was won by the team of Delhi Metropolitan Education, GGSIPU, New Delhi. The winning team comprising:- Damini Bisht Azka Sheikh Kalia Harshit Dave The Best Mooter was awarded to Raavi Shukla of Chanakya National Law University, Patna The Best Researcher was awarded to Kamesh Vedula of Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi. The Best Memorial was awarded to UILS, Punjab University, Chandigarh. The team comprised of- Divya Anshul Singhal Priya Gupta The following is an interview of the Delhi Metropolitan Education, GGSIPU, New Delhi team which won the 1st National Moot Court Competition organized by Institute of law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra held on 12th - 13th March, 2016. Page 1 The winning team comprising:- Damini Bisht Azka Sheikh Kalia Harshit Dave IN SESSION: Hello Guys, first of all Congratulations on your splendid victory! Winning a moot is esteemed moment..
    [Show full text]
  • Keesing's Contemporary Archives
    KEESING'S CONTEMPORARY ARCHIVES WEEKLY DIARY OF IMPORTANT WORLD EVENTS WITH INDEX CONTINUALLY KEPT UP-TO-DATE ESTABLISHED IN 1931 Reports, Statistics and Data selected, condensed, translated, summarised, and indexed from news­ papers, periodicals, and official publications of Great Britain, the British Empire, and Foreign Countries; as well as from information supplied by the recognised international news agencies VOLUME No. VI 1946-1948 KEESING'S PUBLICATIONS LIMITED (of London) 65 Bristol Road • Keynsham • Bristol 8930 KEESING'S CONTEMPORARY ARCHIVES November 8—15, 1947. A. INDIA - PAKISTAN. — The Kashmir Situation. - be supported " ; declared that the Kashmiri authorities had ignored Kashmiri and Pakistani Allegations and Counter- Pakistani suggestions, made much earlier, that representatives of Allegations of Frontier Violations. - Invasion of Kashmir both Governments should meet to seek a solution of outstanding by Moslem Tribesmen. - Kashmir's Accession to India. - difficulties ; and added that the Kashmiri Government's " unfounded allegations and accusations" were merely a " smoke-screen" Non-Acceptance by Pakistan. - Statements by Mr. intended to cover the real purposes of that Government's policy. Jinnah, Mr. Liaquat Ali Khan, and Pandit Nehru. - Mr. Jinnah went on to accuse the Kashmiri Government of differ­ Indian Troops sent to Kashmir. - Invaders driven from ential treatment of Moslems and non-Moslems, saying that on the Srinagar Approaches. - Kashmir Plebiscite on Accession one hand the Sheikh Mohamed Abdullah, who had been
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra
    Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of technology Kurukshetra No/MED/2016/ Dated: 05.01.2016 NOTICE Date & Time of Written Test Jan 24, 2016 (Sunday) 11:00 AM Reporting Time for Attendance Jan 24, 2016 (Sunday) 10:00 AM Venue Mechanical Engineering Department Utmost care has been taken by the screening committee while checking the eligibility of the candidates based on the information supplied by them in their application forms and the criteria mentioned in the PhD prospectus of the institute for the admission in Mechanical Engineering Department for the session beginning from January 2016. The eligible candidates as per the attached list are allowed to appear in the written test. All the candidates who have not submitted Guide Consent/NOC they may submit Guide Consent/NOC at Mechanical Dept. Office on or before 18.01.2016, failure which they will be considered ineligible and not allowed to appear in the written test. Head of Department Mechanical Engineering Prof In charge (CCN) is requested to upload this notice along with the list of applicants finalized by the committee. Enclosed; PDF file of this letter and the list of eligible applicants. Prof In-charge (CCN) Updated List of PhD Applicants Sl. Name of Candidate Father/Husband PhD Marks/University Experience NOC Guide Remarks No. Name Program B.Tech University M.Tech University Consent 1 PRAVEEN T R Ramachandraian B FULL 61.42 VTU 80.13 Bangalore NA NA NO Not Eligible University Guide Consent 2 MOHAMMAD UMAIR Mohammad FULL 69.80 UPTU 69.80 UPTU NA NA YES Eligible
    [Show full text]
  • List of Cases for Lok Adalat for Ncc 21-12-2011
    LIST OF CASES FOR LOK ADALAT FOR 21.12.2011 SR CASE CASE ADVOCATE PARTY NAME NO. TYPE NO/YEAR NAME NARINDER 1 FAO 5094/2002 SUMAN VERMA & ORS VS KARAN PURI & ORS SINGH BAWA BALDEV RAJ 2 FAO 4027/2002 SURESH GUPTA VS RISIHI AGGARWAL & ORS MOHAN SHABHA RANI & OTHERS VS GURPREET SINGH & 3 FAO 4515/2002 ASHOK JINDAL ORS SMT CHANDER LUTHRA VS RAGHUNATH SINGH SANDEEP 4 FAO 3402/2006 AND OTHERS CHHABRA 5 FAO 2875/2005 JEET RAM VS NARESH KUMAR ETC B.S. TEWATIA LIPIKA MAJUMDAR @LIPIKA BHAUMIK ETC VS RAM 6 FAO 3073/2005 JAI VIR YADAV SMAJ JAISAWARA AND OTHERS SMT MEWAWATI AND OTHERS VS ALAUDIN AND BHUPENDER 7 FAO 2261/2005 OTHERS SINGH 8 FAO 2561/2005 MANOHAR LAL VS USHA CHAWLA AND OTHERS K.K. GARG DHARMBIR AND OTHERS VS ISHWAR SINGH AND 9 FAO 4644/2002 ASHIT MALIK OTHERS JASBIR SINGH @ JASVIR SINGH VS SMT SURJIT SINGH 10 FAO 4238/2002 BALWINDER KAUR & ORS SWAICH KM PRIYANKA MALIK & ORS VS NARENDER 11 FAO 4249/2007 R.K.MALIK KUMAR & ORS 12 FAO 2130/2005 INDRA BEDI VS USHA AND OTHERS ASHIT MALIK 13 FAO 4781/2002 NANHA RAM VS PARTAP SINGH & OTHERS OPS TANWAR 14 FAO 4524/2002 KULBIR SINGH VS PANKAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS ASHIT MALIK 15 FAO 5223/2003 SMT LACHMI DEVI VS KULWINDER RAM & ORS G.S. SAWHNEY MAJOR SINGH AND ANOTHER VS GURPREET BRIJESHWAR 16 FAO 4364/2008 SINGH AND ANOTHER SINGH HARDYAL SINGH KAHLON AND OTHERS VS VINOD 17 FAO 4146/2003 ASHIT MALIK KUMAR AND OTHERS 18 FAO 5194/2003 JAGDISH VS RAJINDER KUMAR &OTHERS RAJIV GODARA 19 FAO 4462/2003 DEEP CHAND VS SATBIR AND ANOTHER ASHIT MALIK 20 FAO 4512/2003 KHAZAN SINGH VS RAJIV KUMAR AND OTHERS Y.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak Alumni
    MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY ROHTAK ALUMNI DIRECTORY missing your old friends.. meet them here... MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY ALUMNI OFFICE M. D. UNIVERSITY, Rohtak - 124001 (Haryana) www.mdurohtak.ac.in MDU ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OFFICE BEARERS President (Ex-officio) Prof. R.P. Hooda, Vice – Chancellor, M.D. University, Rohtak Vice President Secretary Joint Secrtary-cum-Treasurer Director, MDU Alumni (Ex-officio) Prof. S.P.S. Dahiya, Prof. K.P.S. Mahalwar, Prof. (Mrs.) Asha Kadiyan, Prof. Nasib Singh Gill, Head, Dept. of English & Foreign Languages, Dept. of Law, Dept. of Eng. & Foreign Languages, Dept. of Comp. Sci. & Applications, M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak M.D. University, Rohtak EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Prof. Narender Kumar Garg Dr. H.J. Ghosh Roy Dr. M.S. Chaudhary Dr. (Mrs.) Sanju Nanda Dr.(Mrs.) Shalini Singh Head, Dept. of Commerce, Professor, IMSAR, Ex-Director, Maharaja Associate Professor, Associate Professor, M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak Suraj Mal Institute Dept. of Pharmaceutical Science, Dept. of Psychology, M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak Dr. Surinder Sharma Mr. Jagbir Singh Rathee Dr. Dinesh Gabba Mr. Atul Jain Associate Professor in History, Director, Youth Welfare, Associate Prof. in Commerce, Director, Malabar Vaish College, Rohtak M.D.University, Rohtak Govt. College, Bhiwani Healthcare Centre, Rohtak MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY 2 l HARYANA RAJ BHAVAN, CHANDIGARH. MESSAGE I am happy to know that Maharshi Dyanand University, Rohtak is organizing its 2nd Alumni Meet on February 12, 2012 and a Alumni Directory is being published on the occasion. The Educational Institutions are the temples of knowledge which make a nation healthy, wealthy and wise.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Jan to Dec 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT I, Shalini Singh Nagpal, have the honour of presenting the Annual Report (January–December, 2018) of Chandigarh Judicial Academy before this August body. It is a matter of pride for all of us that this Academy is considered as a hallmark of standard and quality. The Academy is always marching on the course of achieving its goal of “Proficiency-Performance- Productivity”. During the year, the Academy has made new strides. Chandigarh Judicial Academy extends heartfelt gratitude to Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari, Patron-in-Chief, Chandigarh Judicial Academy, Chief Justice of High Court of Punjab & Haryana, our torch bearer and inspiration. The Academy is fortunate to have this opportunity to perform and grow under the expertise of His Lordship. Chandigarh Judicial Academy is highly grateful to Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan, President, Board of Governors, Chandigarh Judicial Academy, Judge, High Court of Punjab & Haryana, our guiding force, committed towards the strategic planning and management of academic programmes of the Academy. Besides this, we acknowledge with gratitude the contribution of Hon’be Mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jaswant Singh as Presidents of Board of Governors, Chandigarh Judicial Academy during the year 2018, whose practical and target oriented approach in imparting judicial education has brought dynamic changes in the training methodology. Chandigarh Judicial Academy is extremely thankful to Hon’ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih, Hon’ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Palli and Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Lisa Gill, Members, Board of Governors, Chandigarh Judicial Academy, Judges, High Court of Punjab & Haryana.
    [Show full text]
  • Page1final.Qxd (Page 2)
    daily Follow us: Daily Excelsior JAMMU, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2020 REGD. NO. JK-71/18-20 Vol No. 56 14 Pages ` 5.00 ExcelsiorRNI No. 28547/65 No. 347 HC stays Justice Bindal transferred to Calcutta High Court PM makes 4 couples, 5 docs test +ve Govt order strong pitch Excelsior Correspondent Justice Pankaj Mithal likely to for Agri laws 2 women among 6 die of SRINAGAR, Dec 15: The DHORDO (Guj), Dec 15: High Court today stayed the Government order by virtue of Prime Minister Narendra Corona in Jammu, 4 in Valley which all the Secretaries and Modi today said a conspiracy is take over as CJ J&K HC Udhampur, presently putting up at Bishnah and RS Pura and two Head of the Departments were afoot to confuse farmers over the Sanjeev Pargal/ Gangyal Jammu who was seriously each from Akhnoor, Dansal, Kot directed to take review of all new agri laws and accused the Neeraj Rohmetra Fayaz Bukhari injured in a road accident and had Bhalwal and Pallanwalla and administrative actions and proce- opposition of using farmers' tested positive for the virus, suc- one in Sohanjana. Five doctors dures held up on account of six shoulders to fire their guns. JAMMU, Dec 15: Supreme JAMMU/SRINAGAR, Dec cumbed in the GMC Jammu. tested positive across the region. month old interim court orders by As the protest by farmers out- Court collegium has approved 15: Ten persons died of Six casualties have taken Two hundred persons tested treating them expired and proceed side Delhi entered the 20th day, the proposal for appointment of Coronavirus in Jammu and Jammu region's Corona toll to 656 positive for COVID-19 in Jammu accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Justice of India
    CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA The Chief Justice of India (CJI) is the head of the judiciary of India and the Supreme Court of India. The CJI also heads their administrative functions. In accordance with Article 145 of the Constitution of India and the Supreme Court Rules of Procedure of 1966, the Chief Justice allocates all work to the other judges who are bound to refer the matter back to him or her (for re-allocation) in any case where they require it to be looked into by a larger bench of more judges. The present CJI is Justice Dipak Misra and is the 45th CJI since January 1950, the year the Constitution came into effect and the Supreme Court came into being. He succeeded Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar on 28 August 2017 and will remain in office till 2 October 2018, the day he retires on turning 65 years in age. S.No Name Period 1 H. J. Kania 1950-1951 2 M. Patanjali Sastri 1951-1954 3 Mehr Chand Mahajan 1954 4 Bijan Kumar Mukherjea 1954-1956 5 Sudhi Ranjan Das 1956-1959 6 Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha 1959-1964 7 P. B. Gajendragadkar 1964-1966 8 Amal Kumar Sarkar 1966 9 Koka Subba Rao 1966-1967 10 Kailas Nath Wanchoo 1967-1968 11 Mohammad Hidayatullah[10] 1968-1970 12 Jayantilal Chhotalal Shah 1970-1971 13 Sarv Mittra Sikri 1971-1973 14 Ajit Nath Ray 1973-1977 15 Mirza Hameedullah Beg 1977-1978 16 Yeshwant Vishnu Chandrachud 1978-1985 17 Prafullachandra Natwarlal Bhagwati 1985-1986 18 Raghunandan Swarup Pathak 1986-1989 19 Engalaguppe Seetharamiah Venkataramiah 1989 20 Sabyasachi Mukharji 1989-1990 21 Ranganath Misra 1990-1991 22 Kamal Narain Singh 1991 23 Madhukar Hiralal Kania 1991-1992 24 Lalit Mohan Sharma 1992-1993 25 Manepalli Narayana Rao Venkatachaliah 1993-1994 26 Aziz Mushabber Ahmadi 1994-1997 27 Jagdish Sharan Verma 1997-1998 Page 1 CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA 28 Madan Mohan Punchhi 1998 29 Adarsh Sein Anand 1998-2001 30 Sam Piroj Bharucha 2001-2002 31 Bhupinder Nath Kirpal 2002 32 Gopal Ballav Pattanaik 2002 33 V.
    [Show full text]