DOCSLIB.ORG

Magyar Filozófiai Szemle 64. Évf. 4. Sz. (2020.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Magyar Filozófiai Szemle 64. Évf. 4. Sz. (2020.) HUNGARIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW VOL. 64. (2020/4) The Journal of the Philosophical Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Credo ut intelligam or Credo quia absurdum? Reason and Beyond Reason in Religious Faith Edited by Gábor Borbély and Gyula Klima Contents Improper, but Not Illegitimate: Mindreading through the Ages. Introduction (Gábor Borbély – Gyula Klima) 5 GYÖRGY HEIDL: Faith, Reason and Touch 9 GYULA KLIMA: Words and What Is Beyond Words 31 JOSHUA P. HOCHSCHILD: Thomas Aquinas, Magister Ludi: The Relation of Medieval Logic and Theology 43 GÁBOR BORBÉLY: The Triumph of Renouncement. Religious Signals, the Secrets of the Heart, Error, Deception and Happiness in Thomas Aquinas’s Summa contra Gentiles 63 NICOLAS FAUCHER: Croyance volontaire et devoir moral chez Pierre de Jean Olivi 133 MAGALI ROQUES: William of Ockham on the Ontology of Social Objects (in His Academic Writings) 154 GYÖRGY GERÉBY: The Changeability of the Past: Medieval and Modern. A Common Theme between Peter Damian and Hans Jonas 179 DÁNIEL SCHMAL: Tradition and Novelty in Early Modern Scholasticism: The Case of Nicolás Martínez and Leonard Lessius 197 Contributors 215 Summaries 217 Improper, but Not Illegitimate: Mindreading through the Ages (Introduction) “Credo ut intelligam or Credo quia absurdum? – Reason and Beyond Reason in Religious Faith”: this title might suggest that the present volume is just an- other contribution that discusses the relationship between religious faith and knowledge in a traditional manner. This is not precisely the case. In a somewhat unusual way, we have turned our focus to those borderline areas of medieval philosophical and religious thought that are marked by improper, but not illegit- imate uses of philosophical language, devised to convey ideas that are impossi- ble to grasp in terms of ordinary, proper language usage. Thus, we are exploring areas of philosophical and theological language which are designed, adopting a metaphor by Descartes he used to characterize our difficulties in talking about God, to (mentally) touch the bark of a huge oak tree that we cannot embrace. The metaphor of touch, although applied in a different context, plays a central role in György Heidl’s paper. Heidl discusses the Biblical and philosophical con- cepts of faith that might have influenced early Christian spirituality and draws a strong connection between “faith” and the metaphor of “touch,” which – in turn – leads to fundamental questions about Christian and Platonic mysticism. Gyula Klima’s paper, “Words and what is beyond words,” directly addresses the extraordinary hermeneutical scenario generated by the improper, but not illegitimate uses of language required to talk about what is beyond the grasp of the ordinary meanings of our ordinary words. To provide a sufficiently gen- eral theoretical framework for the discussion of this hermeneutical scenario, he distinguishes three typical interpretational practices, and argues for what he re- gards as the “the golden mean” between two bad extremes. Joshua Hochschild describes medieval logic using the metaphor of “game” (with reference to Hermann Hesse’s The Glass Bead Game) and the traditional metaphor of “tool”. In spite of being a leisurely activity, something done for its own sake, a game can also serve a purpose outside of itself. Similarly, a tool is not merely instrumental, insofar as it can have its own intrinsic goods and can shape and be shaped by that which it serves. After reviewing some distinctive ways in which theology shaped developments of medieval logic, Joshua Hochschild’s 6 IMPROPER, BUT NOT ILLEGITIMATE: MINDREADING THROUGH THE AGES paper summarizes key examples from the work of Thomas Aquinas where me- dieval logic shaped the articulation and is therefore crucial to a proper under- standing of theological claims and arguments. The purpose of Gábor Borbély’s paper is to explore some of the basic as- sumptions that, he believes, Aquinas’s ambitious work, the Summa contra Gen- tiles greatly depends on. These assumptions appear to form the bedrock of Aqui- nas’s deep personal convictions, and as such they may have been the driving force behind his attempt to manifest the truth and eliminate all human error in this work. By casting light upon these assumptions, Borbély aims to clarify some aspects of his „odd project” that has stubbornly resisted attempts at contextu- alization. Nicolas Faucher’s paper explores the concept of voluntary belief in Peter John Olivi’s work. Voluntary belief is being produced to fulfill the individuals’ moral duties and to promote common human activities. Its concept, however, seems to be at odds with doxastic normativity that we tend to attribute to our or- dinary beliefs. Furthermore, its use seems to lead to an infinite regress. Nicolas Faucher’s paper deals with these issues in the context of the Olivian doctrine of faith. Magali Roques’s paper focuses on one class of social realities in William of Ockham’s academic writings, the class of “voluntary signs,” which includes not only linguistic signs, but also monetary price, property right, and the sacraments. Roques argues that for Ockham these signs have a social function because a mental act is part of their definition, namely, the decision to endow a material object with a social function for the first time or to follow an established social practice. She further argues that the model of the covenant that grounds social reality (economic and other kinds of social exchanges, including linguistic ex- changes) is to be conceived analogously to the model of the covenant between God and human beings (concerning what is required for salvation, and therefore especially the sacraments). György Geréby delves into a common theme shared by Peter Damian and Hans Jonas, namely, the issue of the changeability of the past. Contrary to the common view, Hans Jonas in the twentieth century and Petrus Damiani in the eleventh, independently from each other, argued for the possibility of a retroac- tively changeable past. In the case of Jonas, the changeability is implicit, based on two considerations: the first is the result of his analysis of the conditions of truth in historical statements, while the second is the consequence of his reflections on the theological implications of the shoah. In Damiani’s case, the changeability is explicit, an original idea against the views of Aristotle, Jerome and Augustine, based on his understanding of divine omnipotence, supported by ingenious logical analysis. While Jonas and Damiani reached their conclu- sions independently, both were based on theological considerations, albeit on widely different ones. IMPROPER, BUT NOT ILLEGITIMATE: MINDREADING THROUGH THE AGES 7 Dániel Schmal analyses some literary and argumentative techniques em- ployed by late scholastic writers to integrate new elements into traditional wis- dom. The authors chosen for this study, Nicolás Martínez and Leonard Lessius, illustrate how late scholastic writers treat the Patristic and medieval heritage when they use authoritative texts for innovative purposes. Although ecclesias- tical authority continues to serve as the basis for theological argumentation in their texts, the case studies highlight how making distinctions among meanings allegedly present in the tradition, along with other “techniques of alignment,” are employed to integrate new ideas and fulfil the need for conformity at the same time. Gábor Borbély – Gyula Klima GYÖRGY HEIDL Faith, Reason and Touch The following is a brief overview of the Biblical meanings of “faith,” including a discussion of the philosophical concepts of faith that may have influenced early Christian spirituality. Then, I further characterize the distinctive Christian understanding of “faith” from several points of view. Finally, I draw a strong connection between “faith” and the metaphor of “touch,” which will lead to fundamental questions about Christian and Platonic mysticism.1 I. FAITH AND THE BIBLE The Greek noun pistis, together with the verb pisteuein in its various forms, ap- pears in the Bible in the sense of faithfulness, faith, trust, vow, oath, approval, and truth. Pistis is one of the most important concepts in the New Testament, because it conveys the central message of revelation: Abraham trusted in God, believed in the promises and remained loyal to the one who made the promises, and this trust, faithfulness and faith, in other word pistis, is completed as faith in Christ and faithfulness and trust in Christ (see, Rm 4:3ff; Gal 3:6ff). This means that in the New Testament the concept of pistis undergoes a kind of natural transformation: initially it expresses the trust and faithfulness that serve as the basis of the covenant first made with Abraham, then with Moses, and subse- quently confirmed repeatedly, until at last designating faith in the resurrection of Christ. It is clear from the Old Testament that God is loyal (pistos) to the one he elected and to all the covenants he made (see e.g. Deut. 7:9). Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are faithful servants of God (e.g., 2 Macc. 1:2), and their faithfulness 1 This paper is largely based on the first chapter of my book, Érintés: Szó és kép a korai keresztény misztikában (Touch: Word and Image in the early Christian Mysticism). Kairosz, Buda- pest, 2011. I am greatly indebted to Gyöngyi Pisák and David Baer for the English translation, and to the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office for supporting my research (NKFI K-128321). 10 GYÖRGY HEIDL are an example to follow for everyone. But human beings are often unfaithful and lose sight of the covenant (e.g., Deut. 32:20; Jer. 7:28, Ps. 76 (77):8). Proph- ets often describe unfaithfulness through the example of infidelity and adultery. God’s faithfulness toward human beings is constant and everlasting, while the faithfulness of the sons of man toward God is unsteady and inconstant. They tend to forget about the covenant and yield to their momentary desires and in- terests.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Defence of Nonsense: Fideism in Tertullian, Kierkegaard, And
    Philsoc Student Essay Prize, Hilary term, 2021 Highly Commended In Defence of Nonsense: Fideism in Tertullian, Kierkegaard, and Wittgenstein By Tom Mosher Do some religious beliefs require no justification? Amongst contemporary sources, philosopher Alvin Plantinga’s responses are often among the first that are cited. Plantinga (2017, p. 306) has aimed to demonstrate analytically that Christian belief is justified, rational and warranted, even without appeal to extrinsic evidence. Indeed, Plantinga’s approach is a compelling one for those who seek a reasonable basis on which to sustain belief. But should we be permitted to believe in God even if it were – or maybe even because it is – contrary to reason? At least one scholar has dismissed this argument as either confused, absurd or ironical (Mawson, 2010, p. 99). Yet, it may be argued that nonsense – defined here as any proposition or belief that not only has no basis in reason or sense perception, but even may be intrinsically incompatible with the exercise of such faculties – may not be as indefensible as it at first seems. In fact, throughout the course of Western civilization, minds as luminous as those of Tertullian, Kierkegaard, and Wittgenstein, among many others, have all defended the subjective, unscientific or inarticulable as the very source of ultimate truth, perhaps even deserving supremacy over philosophy itself. This paper will briefly explore the claims of each of these three sources, in anticipation of concluding that indeed, lucid and coherent assertions can be made in defence of nonsense. Tertullian Misquoted Fideism is the doctrine or theory that certain truths can be grasped only by foregoing rational inquiry and relying solely on faith (Amesbury, 2017, §1).
    [Show full text]
  • Fellowship of Catholic Scholars Quarterly
    Fellowship of Catholic Scholars Quarterly ARTICLES President’s Letter......................................... Dr..Bernard.Dobranski The Origin of Atheism according to Milton, 30 Dryden, and Swift............................................... Anne.Gardiner Number 1 Hermeneutics Revisited.................................... Leo.J..Elders,.S.V.D. Spring 2007 Rationality and Will as the Path to God: The Lecture of Benedict XVI at the University of Regensburg ...................... Fr..Joseph.M..De.Torre Leo Tolstoy and the Catholic Church.....................James.Likoudis Not Everybody Loves Raymond.........................Edmund.J..Mazza BOOK REVIEWS The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief by.Francis.S..Collins.......................................... Robert.E..Hurley,.M.D.. Behind the Scenes at Galileo’s Trial.. by.Richard.J..Blackwell............................................ Jude.P..Dougherty The Future of Europe: Reform or Decline.. by.Alberto.Alesina.and.Francesco.Giavazzi................ Jude.P..Dougherty La Constitución de los Estados Unidos y su Dinámica Actual by.Robert.S..Barker.....................................................D..Q..McInerny Aristotle and the Rediscovery of Citizenship by.Susan.D..Collins..................................................Leo.J..Elders,.S.V.D. James Madison and the Struggle for the Bill of Rights.. by.R..Labunski .......................................... Rev..Michael.P..Orsi Salvation is from the Jews: The Role of Judaism in Salvation History from Abraham to the Second
    [Show full text]
  • How the New Atheists Are Reminding the Humanities of Their Place and Purpose in Society
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 The emperor's new clothes: how the new atheists are reminding the humanities of their place and purpose in society. David Ira Buckner University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Buckner, David Ira, "The emperor's new clothes: how the new atheists are reminding the humanities of their place and purpose in society." (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3112. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3112 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES: HOW THE NEW ATHEISTS ARE REMINDING THE HUMANITIES OF THEIR PLACE AND PURPOSE IN SOCIETY By David Ira Buckner B.S., East Tennessee State University, 2006 M.A., East Tennessee State University, 2008 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ontology in the Just War Tradition
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M University “THAT TRUTH THAT LIVES UNCHANGEABLY”: THE ROLE OF ONTOLOGY IN THE JUST WAR TRADITION A Dissertation by PHILLIP WESLEY GRAY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2006 Major Subject: Political Science © 2006 PHILLIP WESLEY GRAY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED “THAT TRUTH THAT LIVES UNCHANGEABLY”: THE ROLE OF ONTOLOGY IN THE JUST WAR TRADITION A Dissertation by PHILLIP WESLEY GRAY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Cary J. Nederman Committee Members, Elisabeth Ellis Nehemia Geva J. R. G. Wollock Head of Department, Patricia Hurley December 2006 Major Subject: Political Science iii ABSTRACT “That Truth that Lives Unchangeably”: The Role of Ontology in the Just War Tradition. (December 2006) Phillip Wesley Gray, B.A., University of Dayton Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Cary J. Nederman The just war tradition as we know it has its origins with Christian theology. In this dissertation, I examine the theological, in particular ontological, presuppositions of St. Augustine of Hippo in his elucidation of just war. By doing so, I show how certain metaphysical ideas of St. Augustine (especially those on existence, love, and the sovereignty of God) shaped the just war tradition. Following this, I examine the slow evacuation of his metaphysics from the just war tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Side of Religion
    The Dark Side of Religion Morris (Raphael) Cohen (1880-1947) This essay appeared first in the symposium volume, Religion Today, a Challenging Enigma, edited by Arthur L. Swift, Jr. (1933). The version presented here is the revised version from Cohen's, The Faith of a Liberal (1946). Transcribed into hypertext by Andrew Chrucky, Aug. 18, 1998. The advocatus diaboli, as you know, is not a lawyer employed by the Prince of Darkness. He is a faithful member of the Church whose duty it is, when it is proposed to canonize a saint, to search out all the opposing considerations and to state them as cogently as possible. This wise institution compels the advocates of canonization to exert themselves to develop arguments vigorous enough to overcome all objections. In this symposium on religion, I am asked to serve as advocatus diaboli: to state the Dark Side so that those who follow may have definite positions to attack and may thus more fully develop the strength of their case. While there have not been wanting atheists and other free thinkers who have attacked religion root and branch, these assailants have often shared the indiscriminate or fanatical intensity which has characterized so many upholders of religion. It has therefore been possible to pass over the argument of men like Voltaire, Bradlaugh, or Ingersoll, as inaccurate, superficial, and too one-sided. The truth, however, is that religion is something about which men generally are passionate; and it is as difficult to be patient with those who paint its defects as it is to listen attentively to those who point out our most intimate failings or the shortcoming of those we love most dearly, of our family or of our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventeenth Century Thinkers
    Seventeenth Century Thinkers The European background Desiderius Erasmus (1466 - 1536) was intensely aware of a need for change and renewal in Church and University, religion and thought. His demand for a "return to the sources" was an expression of dissatisfaction with what he saw around him. In particular, he had inherited from the Italian Humanists an impatience with what was perceived as the closed dogmatism of medieval Scholasticism. His satire of Folly suggested the need for change, stimulating the thinkers of his time to explore new directions. When Christopher Columbus (1451 - 1506) sailed westwards in 1492, it was at least partly because he refused to accept the conventional reasons given for not doing so. He had no idea of the presence of a vast double continent between Europe and Asia, but he saw no reason for not trying to make a journey of exploration in a new direction. His exploit was preceded by Vasco da Gama's journey round the Cape of Good Hope into the Indian Ocean and it was followed by the better publicized journeys of Amerigo Vespucci westward. Soon Magellan would set out on a journey to circum-navigate the world; he died in the Philippines in 1521 but his ship reached home. The complex events known as the Reformation (and the Counter-Reformation), provoked mainly by Martin Luther followed by Jean Calvin, brought about huge changes in European attitudes. The new stress laid on the Bible, and the rejection of Tradition as a basis for believing the Church's teachings, left each individual more or less free to search for new formulations of their faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: a History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Samuel A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Dayton University of Dayton eCommons Honors Theses University Honors Program 4-2016 Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: A History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Samuel A. Mullins University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses Part of the Biblical Studies Commons eCommons Citation Mullins, Samuel A., "Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: A History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14" (2016). Honors Theses. 146. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses/146 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: A History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Honors Thesis Samuel Mullins Department: Religious Studies Advisor: Meghan Henning, Ph.D. April 2016 Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: A History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Honors Thesis Samuel Mullins Department: Religious Studies Advisor: Meghan Henning, Ph.D. April 2016 Abstract The texts of the Bible have been used and interpreted in various ways across different time periods and different cultures, and there is much to be gained by studying these changes. Changing attitudes about and uses of Scripture tell us something about other changes taking place in society. They reflect new ideas about religion, knowledge, and authority. Most of all, they demonstrate the techniques used by pastors, theologians, and other authors to make texts written long ago relevant to contemporary problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith, Learning and Christian Higher Education
    Faith, Learning and Christian Higher Education Author Millis, Brian David Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (Professional Doctorate) School School of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1192 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366985 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au FAITH, LEARNING AND CHRISTIAN HIGHER EDUCATION by Brian David Millis B.A.(Qld), BEd (CHC), MEdAdmin (UNE) School of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning Faculty of Education Griffith University Queensland, Australia Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Education October 2004 ii Statement of originality This work has not previously been submitted for a degree or diploma in any university. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the thesis itself. Brian David Millis 4 October 2004 iii Faith, Learning and Christian Higher Education Abstract Responding to the absence of readily available models in Australia for thinking about Christian higher education, this thesis investigates what might constitute its foundational principles and distinctive character. The thesis considers the Western Christian tradition, the history of the university, and the contemporary experience of Christian higher education in the United States to identify models for thinking about Christian higher education. It is argued that a central issue to be addressed in developing a distinctively Christian approach to scholarship is the relationship of faith and reason, an issue to which the Christian tradition offers a range of approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Reason in the Grasp of Basic Models
    Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za AUTHOR: Religion and Reason in the Grasp of Jacob Klapwijk* AFFILIATION: Basic Models Modern and Systematic Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam SUMMARY CORRESPONDENCE TO: How do religious faith and human understanding relate to each other? On this question there is Jacob Klapwijk no consensus, nor has there ever been in the past. The history of Western philosophy confronts E-MAIL ADDRESS: us with a complex diversity of views that grew into more or less indisputable standard positions. [email protected] These positions are not the strict result of theoretical reflection. Their acceptance is largely DATES: based on pre-theoretical considerations, the self-evidence of a spiritual intuition or religious Published: 10 Jul 2018 motivation. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: The different views of the relationship of religion and reason can be grouped into a limited klapwijk, J., 2018. Religion and Reason in the Grasp of Basic Models. KOERS number of basic models or motifs. This essay will discuss seven of them as they arose in — Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, the Christian tradition. I will name them as follows: identification, conflict, subordination, 83(1). Available at: https://doi. complementarity, foundation, authenticity and transformation. org/10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2288 COPYRIGHT: KEY CONCEPTS: religion & reason, paradigmatic models, ground motive, transformational © 2018. The Author(s). philosophy Published under the Creative Commons Attribution License. For the sake of brevity the text focuses on the origins and first manifestations of these models. But we will add again and again fragments of further developments to make clear how resilient these models are.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Philosophical Review
    HUNGARIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW VOL. 64. (2020/4) The Journal of the Philosophical Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Credo ut intelligam or Credo quia absurdum? Reason and Beyond Reason in Religious Faith Edited by Gábor Borbély and Gyula Klima Contents Improper, but Not Illegitimate: Mindreading through the Ages. Introduction (Gábor Borbély – Gyula Klima) 5 GYÖRGY HEIDL: Faith, Reason and Touch 9 GYULA KLIMA: Words and What Is Beyond Words 31 JOSHUA P. HOCHSCHILD: Thomas Aquinas, Magister Ludi: The Relation of Medieval Logic and Theology 43 GÁBOR BORBÉLY: The Triumph of Renouncement. Religious Signals, the Secrets of the Heart, Error, Deception and Happiness in Thomas Aquinas’s Summa contra Gentiles 63 NICOLAS FAUCHER: Croyance volontaire et devoir moral chez Pierre de Jean Olivi 133 MAGALI ROQUES: William of Ockham on the Ontology of Social Objects (in His Academic Writings) 154 GYÖRGY GERÉBY: The Changeability of the Past: Medieval and Modern. A Common Theme between Peter Damian and Hans Jonas 179 DÁNIEL SCHMAL: Tradition and Novelty in Early Modern Scholasticism: The Case of Nicolás Martínez and Leonard Lessius 197 Contributors 215 Summaries 217 Improper, but Not Illegitimate: Mindreading through the Ages (Introduction) “Credo ut intelligam or Credo quia absurdum? – Reason and Beyond Reason in Religious Faith”: this title might suggest that the present volume is just an- other contribution that discusses the relationship between religious faith and knowledge in a traditional manner. This is not precisely the case. In a somewhat unusual way, we have turned our focus to those borderline areas of medieval philosophical and religious thought that are marked by improper, but not illegit- imate uses of philosophical language, devised to convey ideas that are impossi- ble to grasp in terms of ordinary, proper language usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Existentialism: Remarks Ox Jean-Paul Sartre's L'btre Et Le Neant*
    PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH A Quarterly Journal VOLUME VIII, No.3 MARCH 1948 EXISTENTIALISM: REMARKS OX JEAN-PAUL SARTRE'S L'BTRE ET LE NEANT* INTRODUCTION "The following pages deal with the sentiment of absurdity which pre­ vails in our world." This opening sentence of Albert Camus' Le Myihe de Sisyphe conveys the climate in which Existentialism orginates. Camus does not belong to the existentialist school, but the basic experience which permeates his thought is also at the root of Existentialism. The time is that of the totalitarian terror: the Nazi regime is at the height of its power; France is occupied by the German armies. The values and standards of western cidlization are coordinated and superseded by the reality of the fascist system. Once again, thought is thrown back upon itself by a reality which contradicts all promises and ideas, which refutes rationalism as well as religion, idealism as well as materialism. Once again, thought finds itself in the Cartesian situation and asks for the one certain and evident truth which may make it still possible to live. The question does not aim at any abstract idea but at the individual's concrete existence: what is the certain and evident experience which can provide the founda­ tion for his life here and now, in this world? Like Descartes, this philosophy finds the foundation in the self certainty of the Cogito, in the consciousness of the Ego. But whereas for Descartes the self-certainty of the Cogito revealed a rational universe, governed by meaningful laws and mechanisms, the Cogito now is thrown into an "absurd" world in which the brute fact of death and the irretrievable process of Time deny all meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Postprint Draft! Please Do Not Cite. SUBLATING RATIONALITY
    This is a Postprint Draft! Please do not Cite. WHEN CITING ALWAYS REFER TO THE FINAL VERSION PUBLISHED IN EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION, Vol. 12, No. 3 WITH DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V0I0.3212 SUBLATING RATIONALITY: THE EUCHARIST AS AN EXISTENTIAL TRIAL Liran Shia Gordon1 The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute The Eucharist, as a pillar of Christian life and faith, stands at the center of the Mass. It bears multi-dimen- sional meanings and functions, each of which addresses a different aspect of Christian life and mindset. This study resonates dialectically between the Eucharist as a unique religious affirmation of faith and philosophical strategies that are developed to meet its challenges, particularly the rational frameworks DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V0I0.3212 by which the believer affirms that the consecrated bread and wine are Christ’s body and blood. On the one hand, the philosophical examination offers new perspectives to understand the Eucharist and its influence on the faithful; on the other hand, the Eucharist and the unique challenges it poses allow us to examine man’s relation to reality within the colors of faith. It will be argued that Edward Schillebeeckx’s discussion of the Eucharist, particularly his attempt to bridge between reality and the symbolic sphere, accords with Heidegger’s reevaluation of the question of Being. The present reading limits itself to the en- . Citable Version has Version . Citable counter between the mind and the phenomenon and does not proceed to the meaning of the Eucharist as part of the Mass and the crucifixion of Christ. However, the focus of the article is not on the phenomenon but rather on the existential position of the subject and his orientation toward reality.
    [Show full text]