Growth and Morphogenesis of the Gastropod Shell
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Growth and morphogenesis of the gastropod shell Adam B. Johnsona, Nina S. Fogela,1, and J. David Lamberta,2 aDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 Edited by Günter P. Wagner, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved February 1, 2019 (received for review September 18, 2018) Gastropod shell morphologies are famously diverse but generally in mantle proliferation (17–21). In the bivalve Pinctada fucata,a share a common geometry, the logarithmic coil. Variations on this gradient of proliferation perpendicular to the mantle edge has morphology have been modeled mathematically and computa- been reported, with generally higher proliferation in interior parts tionally but the developmental biology of shell morphogenesis of the mantle and lower rates in zones near the outer edges (22). remains poorly understood. Here we characterize the organization While the developmental basis of shell morphogenesis remains and growth patterns of the shell-secreting epithelium of the larval obscure, the process has been studied extensively using mathe- shell of the basket whelk Tritia (also known as Ilyanassa). Despite matical modeling. Raup (23) approximated shell shape with three the larval shell’s relative simplicity, we find a surprisingly complex different parameters: distance from axis (d), which is the rate of organization of the shell margin in terms of rows and zones of increase in each whorl’s distance from the coiling axis; aperture cells. We examined cell division patterns with EdU incorporation expansion (w), which is the rate of aperture circumference in- assays and found two growth zones within the shell margin. In the crease; and translation (t), which is the rate of movement along more anterior aperture growth zone, we find that inferred divi- the coiling axis (summarized in Fig. 1B). These parameters make sion angles are biased to lie parallel to the shell edge, and these predictions about patterns of relative growth of the mantle that divisions occur more on the margin’s left side. In the more poste- would generate different types of shells. For example, the aperture rior mantle epithelium growth zone, inferred divisions are signif- of the shell must expand to generate the basic cone shape, and in a icantly biased to the right, relative to the anterior–posterior axis. simple Raup model of shell growth, the helical coil would be These growth zones, and the left–right asymmetries in cleavage generated by greater extension at the dorsal side of the mantle patterns they display, can explain the major modes of shell mor- aperture relative to the ventral, and greater aperture extension on phogenesis at the level of cellular behavior. In a gastropod with a the side near the apex relative to the abapical side. Such growth BIOLOGY different coiling geometry, Planorbella sp., we find similar shell differences have not yet been observed at the cellular level. DEVELOPMENTAL margin organization and growth zones as Tritia, but different left–right asymmetries than we observed in the helically coiled Results Tritia shell of . These results indicate that differential growth pat- Organization of the Larval Mantle. The general anatomy of the terns in the mantle edge epithelium contribute to shell shape in mantle edge in adult molluscs has been described (24–26) but gastropod shells and identify cellular mechanisms that may vary to the larval mantle epithelium has not been examined closely. The generate shell diversity in evolution. mantle edge epithelium of the larva is organized into regular rows and regions (Fig. 2 C–F). We named regions of the larval shell | mollusc | morphogenesis | gastropod mantle based on cellular morphology, patterns of proliferation, and gene expression (described below). The periostracal groove ollusc shells are a remarkable example of the diversity that (PG) is a dominant feature of the shell margin and is clearly Mcan arise as natural selection shapes animal morphology to equivalent between larval and adult shells; this invagination various ecological and functional demands. Their basic functions are structural support and protection, and shells have adapted for these Significance roles in various ways (1–3). Soft body parts are attached to internal shell surfaces to maintain the organization of the body, and external Mollusc shells are emblematic of the morphological diversity in structures can be withdrawn into shells for protection from predators nature. They are important models for understanding the evo- or desiccation. Shell shapes often have other functions, including pelagic – lution of form; they are all variations on the same basic geo- locomotion, burrowing, hunting, and thermal management (3 7). metrical groundplan, their shapes can be directly related to For these reasons, mollusc shells are important models for studying various adaptations, and they have an exquisite fossil record. – morphological evolution in extant and fossil populations (8 10). Despite these advantages, the developmental mechanisms that Gastropods generally have one helically coiled shell; within control shell development are unknown. We examined cell di- that groundplan there is immense variation in shape, size, or- vision patterns in the shell-secreting epithelium and found strik- namentation, coiling direction, and pigmentation (Fig. 1A). ing asymmetries in proliferation rate and division orientation that Having a single shell for the lifetime of the animal often means correlate with key aspects of shell morphogenesis in two gas- that the same basic morphology must function over several or- tropods with different shell shapes. This work provides a foun- ders of magnitude in size, from a planktonic larval stage to a dation for understanding the cellular and developmental large benthic animal. Gastropod shells grow by increasing their mechanisms that generate gastropod shell form and suggest how number of coils, or whorls, by exclusively growing at their ap- such mechanisms might evolve to generate new morphologies. erture. A consequence of this growth pattern is that previous whorls are retained, recording the ontogenetic pattern of growth. Author contributions: A.B.J. and J.D.L. designed research; A.B.J. and N.S.F. performed Despite this morphological diversity, and their utility for studies research; A.B.J., N.S.F., and J.D.L. analyzed data; and A.B.J. and J.D.L. wrote the paper. of morphological evolution, the mechanisms that underlie shell The authors declare no conflict of interest. morphogenesis are not known. The differential deposition of shell This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. material that ultimately creates shell morphology is likely driven, Published under the PNAS license. at least in part, by differential growth of the mantle epithelium. 1Present address: Department of Biology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103. However, the patterns of cell division and growth of the mantle 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. have received little attention. Some developmental regulatory This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. genes are expressed in the mantle epithelium that generates the 1073/pnas.1816089116/-/DCSupplemental. shell (11–16). The growth factor dpp/BMP2-4 has been implicated www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1816089116 PNAS Latest Articles | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on October 3, 2021 and functional units (Fig. 3). We found multiple genes that are specific to particular rows. We also observe varying periodicities in expression across the shell margin, ranging from every one to every five cells. Together, the expression patterns within and between rows likely contribute to the specific functions of particular rows. These results show that discrete morphological zones are present inthelarvalmantleedgeepithelium, including the periostracal groove. These correspond to regions that have been characterized in the mantle of adults (24), suggesting that the larval shell margin may be a useful model for understanding the development of the gastropod shell. Importantly, the larval shell has helicospiral growth that is geometrically similar to that of the adult (Fig. 1 C–E). Cell Proliferation in the Mantle Epithelium. To investigate the dif- ferential growth of the shell margin, we labeled proliferating cells with the thymidine analog EdU, revealing high levels of division in the cells of the AGZ and MEGZ compared with other mantle epithelium regions (Fig. 4A). A total of 20% of AGZ nuclei and Fig. 1. Shell diversity and the whelk Tritia obsoleta (also known as Ilyanassa) 33% of MEGZ nuclei were labeled. Periostracal groove cells as a model for studies of shell development. (A) Composite photo showing (rows +1, 0, and −1) showed much lower labeling rates (2%, 3%, examples of the morphological diversity of gastropod shells, listed clockwise and 4%, respectively). Squamous cells were also rarely labeled from Upper Left. All measurements refer to longest photographed axis. (4%). This experiment revealed high rates of division in the A keyhole limpet shell (25 mm; Diodora sp.) viewed from the left side with MEGZ and the AGZ, indicating that these regions function as the apex of the shell up and the aperture down, has no coiling and high growth zones in the mantle epithelium. rates of aperture expansion. A shell of Murex sp. (140 mm) from the aper- ture side, with the apex up; this shell has typical gastropod coiling, but ex- treme expansion of the aperture away from the apical side, producing