Mojave National Preserve Science Newsletter April 2009, Number 1 This Science Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mojave National Preserve Science Newsletter April 2009, Number 1 This Science Newsletter Mojave National Preserve National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Science Newsletter Responses of Mule Deer to Experimental Manipulation of Water Sources: Preliminary Results from the First Year Providing water sources for wildlife in arid regions is a method of habitat improvement that has been utilized by managers for many years. At least 122 artificial water sources, known as guzzlers, were in existence when Mojave National Preserve was created in 1994. These are basically tanks that collect runoff and store it underground. A significant population of desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) is supported in the Old Dad and Kelso Peaks area by artificial tanks – otherwise ideal sheep habitat that lacks natural water sources. The Mojave Desert has a long history of cattle grazing going back to the late Two mule deer does, one with collar and ear tags, photographed by a motion-triggered nineteenth century. Numerous wells, camera at Deer Spring in the Cima Dome area. troughs, and pipelines were developed to support and distribute cattle on the was utilized by constructing shallow In response, Mojave National Preserve, landscape. Near surface groundwater horizontal tunnels for gravity flow and by the University of Nevada – Reno, and pumping. From 1998 through 2002, California Department of Fish and Game grazing allotments in Mojave National initiated research with support from Safari In this Issue: Preserve were purchased, retired, and Club International to investigate the effect • Page 1. Responses of Mule Deer to donated to the National Park Service. that water provision has on mule deer Experimental Manipulation of Water Approximately 12,000 cattle were (Odocoileus hemionus) fecundity, Sources: Preliminary Results from the First Year, N. Darby, J. Dungan, K. removed from 1,260,980 formerly grazed physical condition, and survival. The Stewart, V. Bleich, D. Hughson. acres along with about 4000 feral burros study area is the northern half of the (Equis asinus). Troughs, pipelines, and Preserve from Cima Dome to Barnwell, • Page 4. Mohave Tui Chub Recovery: pumps were removed with the cattle and divided into a control area with Hybridization and Invasion, D. Hughson, N. Darby, S. Parmenter, S. many wells were abandoned. Loss of permanent natural water sources, a Henkanaththegedara, J. Seigel. these developments generated treatment area where water is added, controversy among hunting and and a dry area. Water was provided at • Page 7. Tortoise on Roads in Mojave Preserve, D. Hughson, N. Darby. environmental organizations regarding Government Holes, Petit Well, Gold King the relationship between livestock Well, Eagle Well, and Hogaboom Well in • Page 10. Effects of small mammals on watering troughs and viable populations late August to early September of 2008. post-fire vegetation recovery in the Mojave Desert, P. Stapp. of wildlife species. The experimental design calls for six Mojave National Preserve Science Newsletter April 2009, Number 1 This Science Newsletter: The Mojave Desert is internationally known as a place to conduct scientific research on desert ecosystems. In fact Mojave National Preserve was designated in part to "retain and enhance opportunities for scientific research in undisturbed ecosystems" as stated in the California Desert Protection Act of 1994. Significant research is done through the Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert Research Center, part of the University of California Natural Reserve System, and the Desert Studies Center, operated by the California Desert Studies Consortium of California State Universities, both of which are located in the Preserve. The purpose of this newsletter is Mule deer and water distribution on Cima Dome in Mojave National Preserve. A yearlong 95% three-fold. First, we would like to range utilization estimate was 14,268 acres for five deer combined on Cima Dome. This range highlight some of the research being included two of five known water sources. done by university scientists in the more wells to be added at the five year vegetation at water sources in Mojave Preserve and distribute this information to park staff and midpoint of the study. Radio collared National Preserve. management. Second, this periodical mule deer will be located throughout the will allow us to inform the public and year and photographed by remote Mule deer were captured by net gun from research community about science cameras. Survival probabilities will be a helicopter in January of 2008 and 2009. being done by Preserve staff or estimated using known fate analyses Physical condition of the captured deer funded through the National Park Service. And most importantly, we implemented in Program Mark (White and was measured by ultrasound along with would like to build collaboration Burnham 1999). Information theoretic standard lengths and weight. Blood, hair, between scientists and resource model selection approaches (Burnham dental, and fecal samples were collected. managers so that scientists are made and Anderson 2002) will be used to The animals were equipped with ear tags aware of the needs of managers and assess variation in survival. and radio and Global Positioning Satellite top quality science is brought to bear (GPS) collars. The results from this first on the problems facing resource managers. Vegetation and local precipitation will be year of this study, although preliminary monitored in both the treatment and and inconclusive, have already Our intention is to publish this twice control areas. Shrub cover will be significantly increased our understanding, per year, once in the spring and again estimated within 200 m of springs and as little is known about this population. in the fall, in print at our Visitor wells in both the treatment and control Centers and electronically on the web. Articles will range from non- areas by establishing ten 50 m transects Five mule deer were tracked in the Cima technical news stories to highly within 200 m of each well and spring site. Dome control area and appeared to technical research reports. All Shrub cover will be estimated annually range along the northwest side of the material in this newsletter has been within each transect using the line dome. There are five permanent water peer-reviewed by subject matter intercept method (Bonham 1989). Cover sources on Cima Dome: Kessler Spring, experts. In each issue we will discuss and biomass of herbaceous plants by Cut Spring, White Rock Spring, Deer a resource management issue or research need along with possible forage category (Bonham 1989) will be Spring, and Valley View Ranch. The means of obtaining funding. The estimated each season by clipping range of the deer encompassed Deer resource management concern vegetation inside and outside of Spring and Valley View. Visitation to Deer highlighted in this issue is invasive moveable exclosures using a one square Spring by the five collared deer was plant species, particularly Sahara meter plot frame. These vegetation sporadic and inconsistent. Only one mustard. studies will provide basic information on collared deer visited throughout the year Debra Hughson, Science Advisor the spatial and temporal dynamics of but disappeared for periods of up to 34 2 Mojave National Preserve Science Newsletter 2009, Number 1 days. The remaining four deer visited for one to three week intervals two or three times during the year. Telemetry location information indicated that at least two deer used the water source at Valley View, which did not have a camera station installed at the time, and that all deer wandered away from Deer Spring for varying lengths of time throughout the year. When deer were consistently around Deer Spring, defined as periods with visitation gaps less than 20 days, all five deer visited on average once every 5.23 days. The highest visitation rates occurred in August with visits once every two days. Deer visited the spring primarily during night-time hours. Marked deer were only photographed at Deer Spring on Cima Dome despite having cameras A Mojave National Preserve Wildlife Biologist releases a mule deer doe freshly equipped with a GPS collar, VHF radio collar, and ear tags near Kessler Spring. deployed at springs in the areas where mule deer were collared. Photographs season, only 14 does (50%) were collecting and analyzing photographs from cameras at three other springs carrying twins. We suspect that because from the motion-activated cameras. confirmed telemetry results in that no the fall of 2008 was much drier than 2007 collared deer visited those sites. the availability of forage was lower and This study of mule deer and water the does were not as able to carry twins. sources, planned for ten years in two five- We used photographs of collared deer These data are preliminary, but the year phases, will provide Mojave National taken with the infrared-triggered cameras correlation between late summer and fall Preserve’s management with much to estimate the number of mule deer weather events and the corresponding useful information on resource utilization utilizing Deer Spring. Separate Lincoln- response of vegetation likely influences by mule deer, mule deer reproduction, Peterson Index estimates were made pregnancy and twinning rates in these visitation at springs by mule deer and during 2 week periods from February 1, mule deer. As we collect more data other animal species photographed by 2008 through January 15, 2009 with 95% during this study we will be able to the cameras, and vegetation dynamics confidence intervals (CI). We estimated examine the effects of weather variation correlated with local precipitation that 26 deer (95% CI 18-44) were using as well as provision of water on physical variability and herbivory as it effects mule Deer Spring. condition and reproduction mule deer deer reproduction. Although this study is inhabiting this portion of the Mojave just beginning, experimental manipulation In January, 2008 we captured 18 mule Desert. of water in October of 2008 did result in a deer including 15 does, 2 bucks, and 1 detectable response when a mule deer yearling female.
Recommended publications
  • Care and Spawning of the Endangered Mohave Tui Chub in Captivity Thomas P
    9 American Currents Vol. 35, No. 2 Care and Spawning of the Endangered Mohave Tui Chub in Captivity Thomas P. Archdeacon and Scott A. Bonar (TA, SB) School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona, 104 Biological Science East, Tucson, AZ 85721 (TA, current address) New Mexico Fishery Resources Office, 3800 Commons Blvd, Albuquerque, NM 87109, [email protected] aptive spawning of endangered species can be an lect and study these fishes in captivity. Here, we examine the important part in the recovery of a species. Mohave tui chub in captivity (Fig. 1), and examine some Working in a controlled setting allows accurate methods that resulted in natural spawning in captivity. C observations of early life-history traits, and cap- Mohave tui chub are the only native fish in the Mojave tive-produced offspring can reduce collection of wild fish for River basin, and are probably not closely related to other Gila experimental studies and translocations (Buyanak and Mohr, chubs, often placed in their own genus, Siphateles. There are 1981; Rakes et al., 1999). Many endangered fishes, including no less than 13 described subspecies of tui chub in the United endangered cyprinids such as Colorado pikeminnow, bony- States, ranging from Oregon, to the southernmost population tail, humpback chub, and roundtail chub, have been spawned in the Mojave basin. Populations of Mohave tui chub declined in the laboratory (Hamman, 1982a, 1982b). Species in the in the Mojave River after the 1930s, when competition genus Gila seem to be particularly easy to spawn in captivity, occurred with arroyo chubs G. orcutti (Hubbs and Miller, three additional species have been spawned in captivity at the 1943), which were believed to have been introduced into the University of Arizona, including Gila chub (Gila intermedia), headwaters by anglers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Complexity of Non-Native Species Impacts In
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY OF NON-NATIVE SPECIES IMPACTS IN DESERT AQUATIC SYSTEMS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Sujan Maduranga Henkanaththegedara In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Program: Environmental and Conservation Sciences March 2012 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY OF NON-NATIVE SPECIES IMPACTS IN DESERT AQUATIC SYSTEMS By Sujan Maduranga Henkanaththegedara The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Craig Stockwell Chair Dr. Mark Clark Dr. Malcolm Butler Dr. Bernhardt Saini-Eidukat Approved by Department Chair: 03.02.12 Craig Stockwell Date Signature ABSTRACT Without an adequate understanding of complex interactions between native and non- native species, management of invasive species can result in unforeseen detrimental impacts. I used both field and laboratory experiments to study reciprocal species interactions between the endangered Mohave tui chub (Siphateles bicolor mohavensis) and invasive western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). I also examined the impacts of both fish species on the aquatic invertebrate communities in desert springs. I demonstrate a case of intraguild predation (IGP) as a mechanism facilitating co- persistence of the endangered Mohave tui chub with invasive mosquitofish using field mesocosm experiments. In this case of IGP, adult tui chub prey on adult and juvenile mosquitofish, while adult mosquitofish prey on tui chub eggs and/or larvae. I conducted laboratory predation trials to assess if IGP was size-structured due to predator gape-limitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Lake Valley Tui Chub Listing Petition
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE FISH LAKE VALLEY TUI CHUB (SIPHATELES BICOLOR SSP. 4) AS A THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Tui Chub, Siphateles bicolor (Avise, 2016, p. 49) March 9, 2021 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 1 March 9, 2021 NOTICE OF PETITION David Bernhardt, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Martha Williams Principal Deputy Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Amy Lueders, Regional Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 1306 Albuquerque, NM 87103-1306 [email protected] Marc Jackson, Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno Fish and Wildlife Office 1340 Financial Blvd., Suite 234 Reno, Nevada 89502 [email protected] Dear Secretary Bernhardt, Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b); section 553(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 553(e); and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity, Krista Kemppinen, and Patrick Donnelly hereby petition the Secretary of the Interior, through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS” or “Service”), to protect the Fish Lake Valley tui chub (Siphateles bicolor ssp. 4) as a threatened or endangered species. The Fish Lake Valley tui chub is a recognized, but undescribed, subspecies of tui chub. Should the service not accept the tui chub as valid subspecies we request that it be considered as a distinct population as it is both discrete and significant.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3kp0q16j Author Murray, Max DeLonais Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Biology by Max DeLonais Murray 2019 © Copyrite by Max DeLonais Murray 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage by Max DeLonais Murray Master of Science in Biology University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor Donald G. Buth, Chair Several species of fishes have been introduced into the Santa Clara River system in southern California, including Catostomus santaanae (Santa Ana sucker), Catostomus fumeiventris (Owens sucker), Gila orcutti (arroyo chub), and Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow). These species are known to inhabit similar ecological niches but little is known about their associated parasite fauna. Two C. fumeiventris, 35 C. santaanae, 63 hybrid catostomids, 214 G. orcutti, and 18 P. promelas were collected and necropsied in the summers of 2017 and 2018. Nine macroparasite taxa were harvested including seven native, and two nonnative parasites Schyzocotyle acheilognathi (Asian fish tapeworm) and Lernaea cyprinacea (anchor worm). Prevalence and intensity of parasites were not related to the genetic history of these catostomids. This is the first host-association record for G. orcutti with Gyrodactylus sp., S. acheilognathi, ii diplostomid metacercariae, Rhabdochona sp, Contracaecum sp., and larval acuariid cysts and for P.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Trough to Trough
    Trough to trough The Colorado River and the Salton Sea Robert E. Reynolds, editor The Salton Sea, 1906 Trough to trough—the field trip guide Robert E. Reynolds, George T. Jefferson, and David K. Lynch Proceedings of the 2008 Desert Symposium Robert E. Reynolds, compiler California State University, Desert Studies Consortium and LSA Associates, Inc. April 2008 Front cover: Cibola Wash. R.E. Reynolds photograph. Back cover: the Bouse Guys on the hunt for ancient lakes. From left: Keith Howard, USGS emeritus; Robert Reynolds, LSA Associates; Phil Pearthree, Arizona Geological Survey; and Daniel Malmon, USGS. Photo courtesy Keith Howard. 2 2008 Desert Symposium Table of Contents Trough to trough: the 2009 Desert Symposium Field Trip ....................................................................................5 Robert E. Reynolds The vegetation of the Mojave and Colorado deserts .....................................................................................................................31 Leah Gardner Southern California vanadate occurrences and vanadium minerals .....................................................................................39 Paul M. Adams The Iron Hat (Ironclad) ore deposits, Marble Mountains, San Bernardino County, California ..................................44 Bruce W. Bridenbecker Possible Bouse Formation in the Bristol Lake basin, California ................................................................................................48 Robert E. Reynolds, David M. Miller, and Jordon Bright Review
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Exposures
    Searching for the Pliocene: Southern Exposures Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center The 2012 Desert Research Symposium April 2012 Table of contents Searching for the Pliocene: Field trip guide to the southern exposures Field trip day 1 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Robert E. Reynolds, editor Field trip day 2 �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19 George T. Jefferson, David Lynch, L. K. Murray, and R. E. Reynolds Basin thickness variations at the junction of the Eastern California Shear Zone and the San Bernardino Mountains, California: how thick could the Pliocene section be? ��������������������������������������������������������������� 31 Victoria Langenheim, Tammy L. Surko, Phillip A. Armstrong, Jonathan C. Matti The morphology and anatomy of a Miocene long-runout landslide, Old Dad Mountain, California: implications for rock avalanche mechanics �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38 Kim M. Bishop The discovery of the California Blue Mine ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 44 Rick Kennedy Geomorphic evolution of the Morongo Valley, California ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45 Frank Jordan, Jr. New records
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Chub Survey Report 2010
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Arroyo chub (Gila orcutti) Survey Report 2010 23 March 2011 Arroyo Chub Survey Report 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES...............................................................................................................2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................2 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ..........................................................................................................2 STUDY SITE SELECTION .................................................................................................................3 ESTABLISHING SAMPLING UNITS ..................................................................................................5 SURVEY METHODS .......................................................................................................................5 RESULTS..........................................................................................................................................................6 DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Point Mugu INRMP EA
    Final Environmental Assessment for the Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) Point Mugu, California Prepared For DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Mr. Thomas Keeney, Natural Resources Manager NBVC Point Mugu, Environmental Division Point Mugu, California Prepared By: TETRA TECH EM INC. February 2002 Final Environmental Assessment for the Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) Point Mugu, California RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Proposed Action: Implementation of the 2002 INRMP for NBVC Point Mugu, Ventura County, California Point of Contact: Mr. Thomas Keeney Naval Air Station Point Mugu Environmental Division Code 833210E Point Mugu, CA 93042-5001 (805) 989-3808 Abstract: Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) Point Mugu proposes to implement an Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) consistent with the military use of the property and the goals and objectives of the Sikes Act Improvement Act (SAIA) (16 U.S. C. 670a et seq) of 1997. The intent of the INRMP is to implement an ecosystem-based conservation program that provides for conservation and enhancement of natural resources in a manner that is consistent with the military mission, that integrates and coordinates all natural resources management activities, that provides for sustainable multipurpose uses of natural resources, and that provides public access for the use of natural resources subject to safety and military security considerations. The EA considers two management alternatives: the Proposed Action and No Action Alternative. Because the No Action Alternative does not fulfill statutory requirements under the SAIA for ecosystem-based, long-term natural resource planning, the No Action Alternative was rejected.
    [Show full text]
  • MTC Asian Tapeworm Final Report To
    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE FISH AND WILDLIFE RESEARCH UNIT FEBRUARY 2008 Effects of the Asian Tapeworm on the Endangered Mohave Tui Chub Thomas P. Archdeacon, Scott A. Bonar, S. Jason Kline, Alison Iles, and Debra Hughson Fisheries Research Report 02 -08 Funding Provided by: 2 Effects of Asian Tapeworm on the Endangered Mohave Tui Chub by Thomas P. Archdeacon, Scott A. Bonar, Jason Kline and Alison Iles USGS Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Arizona And Debra Hughson Mohave National Preserve National Park Service Fisheries Research Report 02-08 Funding Provided by: USGS National Park Service University of Arizona 3 Acknowledgements We thank the US Geologic Survey, Natural Resource Preservation Program (NRPP), the National Park Service and the University of Arizona for funding this project. We thank Anindo Choudhury (St. Norbert College), Steve Parmenter of California Fish and Game, and Judy Hohman and Doug Threloff from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for assistance obtaining permits, parasitological advice and study design; Robert Fulton of the University of California Fullerton Desert Research Center for field assistance, hospitality, and access to water and weather data at Lake Tuendae; and Jessica Koehle (University of Minnesota) and Scott Campbell (Kansas Biological Survey) for supplying us with a source of viable tapeworm eggs. For assistance in sampling design and manuscript review, we thank David Ward (Arizona Game and Fish Department), William Matter and Peter Reinthal (University of Arizona). Jorge Rey (University of Florida) provided information on copepod culture techniques. Finally, we thank Andrea Francis, Shannon Grubbs, Erica Sontz, and Sean Tackley (University of Arizona), Sujan Henkanaththegedara (North Dakota State University), and Susan Williams (China Lake Naval Weapons Center) for laboratory and field assistance, and study advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Zzyzx Mineral Springs— Cultural Treasure and Endangered Species Aquarium
    Cultural and Natural Resources: Conflicts and Opportunities for Cooperation Zzyzx Mineral Springs— Cultural Treasure and Endangered Species Aquarium Danette Woo, Mojave National Preserve, 222 East Main Street, Suite 202, Barstow, California 92311; [email protected] Debra Hughson, Mojave National Preserve, 222 East Main Street, Suite 202, Barstow, California 92311; [email protected] A Brief History of Zzyzx Human use has been documented at Soda Dry Lake back to the early predecessors of the Mohave and Chemehuevi native peoples, who occupied the land when the Spanish explorers first explored the area early in the 19th century. Soda Springs lies in the traditional range of the Chemehuevi, who likely used and modified the area in pursuit of their hunter–gatherer econo- my.Trade routes existed between the coast and inland to the Colorado River and beyond for almost as long as humans have occupied this continent. These routes depended on reliable springs, spaced no more than a few days’ walk apart, and Soda Springs has long been a reliable oasis in a dehydrated expanse. The first written record of Soda Springs Soda Springs, dubbed “Hancock’s Redoubt” comes from the journals of Jedediah Strong for Winfield Scott Hancock, the Army Smith, written in 1827 when he crossed Soda Quartermaster in Los Angeles at the time. The Lake on his way to Mission San Gabriel. Army’s presence provided a buffer between Smith was the first American citizen to enter the emigrants from the East and dispossessed California by land. He crisscrossed the west- natives. California miners also traveled the ern half of the North American continent by Mojave Road on their way to the Colorado foot and pack animal from 1822 until he was River in 1861.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Freshwater, Anadromous, and Euryhaline Fishes of California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 86(4):244-258 2000 A LIST OF FRESHWATER, ANADROMOUS, AND EURYHALINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA PETER B. MOYLE Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology University of California, Davis 1 Shields Avenue Davis, California 95616 e-mail: pbmoyle @ ucdavis.edu LIAM H. DAVIS California Department of Fish and Game 7329 Silverado Trail Yountville, California 94558 The freshwater fishes of California include 67 native resident or anadromous species, 53 non-native species, and 5 marine species that occur in fresh water, for a total of 125 species. Within these species, 100 taxa at lower levels (subspecies, Evolutionary Significant Units, runs of anadromous fish) are recognized. The number of freshwater fish species in California is increasing due to invasions of non-native fishes, which are becoming established at a rate of about 1 species every 3 years. Of the native fishes, 5 full species are extinct in California. Thus, the actual number of species maintaining populations in the state is 120. Of extant native species, 15 (22%) are threatened with extinction in the near future. Only 27 native species (40%) can be regarded as having secure populations. INTRODUCTION The fishes of California’s inland waters are a mixture of resident, anadromous, and euryhaline species, both native and non-native. The first attempt to compile a comprehensive list of these species was Evermann and Clark (1931), who listed 78 native species and 32 introduced species. Native species included an anomalous Pacific hagfish, Epatretus stouti, from the Eel River, 14 forms all now considered to be rainbow trout, and 18 other forms that are either no longer recognized as species or were mistakenly considered to be part of the California fish fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • 112Th Annual Meeting May 3, 2019
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES TH 112 ANNUAL MEETING MAY 3, 2019 California State University Northridge 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES About the Academy The objectives of the Academy are to promote fellowship among scientists and those interested in science; to contribute to scientific literature through publication of pertinent manuscripts; to encourage and promote scholarship among young scientists; and to provide information to the membership, to the public, and to the public agencies on such matters as may be of joint interest to the sciences and society. ARTICLE II – OBJECTIVES in the By-Laws of the Southern California Academy of Sciences The Academy utilizes dues and contributions to promote student research, from high school students through the college graduate level with the following activities: • Research Training Program: High school students conduct research with professional mentors and present their results at the Annual Meeting. Top presenters also attend the national conference of the American Junior Academy of Science held in conjunction with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. • Research support: Undergraduate and graduate students receive grants to help cover their research costs. • Cash awards: Undergraduate and graduate students receive awards for best presentation and best poster at the Annual Meeting. The Academy is working toward expanding its student programs by increasing the number of student participants, as well as increasing the amount of research support and cash awards. Contributions are vital in helping the Academy achieving this goal. The Southern California Academy of Sciences is a Federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit organization Please join us for future meetings! May 8, 2020 May 2021 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES President’s Message Friends and colleagues, Welcome to the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Southern California Academy of Sciences at California State University Northridge.
    [Show full text]