The 95 Theses Or] Disputation for Clarifying the Power of Indulgences 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
[The 95 Theses or] Disputation for Clarifying the Power of Indulgences 1 1517 TIMOTHY J. WENGERT Introduction The 95 Theses of Martin Luther may constitute one of the best known and yet least understood of his writings. Given the terseness of individual theses, the technical nature of many of the arguments, and the debates over the �history of 1. This title (Latin: Disputatio . the document, this is hardly surprising. For a twenty-first- pro declaratione virtutis indulgentiarum) century reader to understand them more fully, one must is taken from the 1517 reprint of Luther’s theses, which in all other consider certain theological, historical, and literary aspects printings bore no title at all. of the document. Theological Background Already St. Jerome (c. 347–420) had argued that after the shipwreck of sin, Christians had at their disposal two planks: first, baptism, which forgave the guilt and punish- ment for all sin; and then, for mortal sins committed after baptism, penance. Medieval theology defined a mortal sin as 2. Venial sins, which involved a grave act of commission or omission involving willful dis- minor infractions, ignorance of the 2 regard for God’s clear commands. Such a sin put a person in consequences, or lack of intention, a state of mortal sin (that is, dead to God and liable to pun- were forgiven anytime one prayed the ishment in hell) and included two consequences: guilt and Fifth Petition of the Lord’s Prayer. 13 14 THE ROOTS OF REFORM punishment (Latin: culpa et poena).a According to Peter Lom- bard (c. 1096–1164), the early Scholastic theologian from Paris whose Sentences (collected statements of the church fathers interspersed with his brief comments) became the basic theological textbook at universities for the next four hundred years, penance was one of the seven sacraments of 3. The others being baptism, the the church.3 The sacrament of penance consisted of three Lord’s Supper, confirmation, parts: contrition, confession, and satisfaction. While bap- ordination, marriage, and last rites tism contained stronger grace and remitted the guilt and (extreme unction). In The Babylonian punishment for all sin, it could only be performed once. As Captivity of the Church (1520; LW 36:3–126), Luther reduced the number a result, the sacrament of penance, to which one had contin- to three (baptism, Lord’s Supper, and, ual access because it was repeatable, became in the Middle as a daily use of baptism, confession Ages the crucial means of moving the sinner from a state and absolution [= penance]). of sin into a state of grace. While repeatable, the grace of this sacrament differed in that, although it fully removed the guilt of sin, it only reduced the penalty or punishment (Latin: poena) from an eternal punishment to a temporal one. 4. This contrasted with attrition, Contrition, or sorrow for sin out of love of God,4 was defined as a sorrow for sin out of fear the first part of the process. By the late Middle Ages, some of punishment. teachers, including Gabriel Biel (c. 1420–1495) a professor in Tübingen and author of several textbooks that Luther used while in Erfurt, insisted that with such sorrow for sin a person already moved from a state of sin to a state of grace. Most other theologians, such as Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), argued that the transfer took place during the second part of the sacrament, when one went to confes- sion and, upon a thorough confession of all sins committed since the previous confession, heard the priest’s absolution. (By contrast, for Biel the person went to the priest for con- fession for the same reason cleansed lepers in the Old Tes- tament went to the Levitical priests—to guarantee that the contrition was genuine and, thus, that the leprosy of sin was gone.)b Whenever it took place, the move from a state of sin to a state of grace was brought about by an infusion into the soul of a disposition of love (Latin: habitus charitatis), that is, a Luther uses this distinction in theses 5 and 6, for example. b See below, Sermon on Penance, p. 197 n. 29. The 95 Theses 15 the grace that makes one acceptable to God (Latin: gratia gratum faciens). The guilt of sin was completely removed, and the punishment reduced from eternal to temporal. The third part, satisfaction, took place after private con- fession, when the forgiven Christian, now in a state of grace, did good works to satisfy the temporal punishment remain- ing for his or her sin. In addition to the traditional good works of prayer, fasting, and almsgiving, other things like participating in a crusade for religious reasons, founding a monastery, contributing to the construction of churches, going on pilgrimages, and the like were also included. For each mortal sin, penitential books used by the priests speci- fied certain penalties. Because most persons committed so many mortal sins over their lifetimes as to accumulate more works of satisfaction than could be done while alive, and because the Bible insisted that only the pure in heart would “see God” (that is, participate in the heavenly, beatific vision), God mercifully established a place of purgation (Latin: pur- gatorium) where the remaining temporal punishments could be satisfied under the overarching assumption that, for the sake of divine righteousness, punishment had to be exacted for every sin. There was some debate over whether the soul in purgatory could then make progress or whether the suffer- ing there was experienced only passively. While the suffering in purgatory was far worse than human suffering on earth, there was only one exit, so to speak, namely, heaven (see the- ses 16–19). When the power of indulgences came to include purgatory, a few theologians also raised questions over the mode of papal authority over such souls, since the souls had passed from this life (see theses 25–26). Indulgences came into play precisely in this third part of the sacrament of penance, in that the church could be “indulgent” and reduce or eliminate the temporal penalty demanded for particular mortal sins far beyond the value of an individual work. Certain actions, including donations of money, insofar as they were connected to honoring Christ, Mary, or other saints, could result in obtaining such an indulgence. There were basically two kinds of indulgences, both under the ultimate authority of the pope as Peter’s 16 THE ROOTS OF REFORM successor (based on Matt. 16:19), who granted to local bishops author- ity over the first kind. This kind was a partial indulgence, wherein the church lessened by a fixed amount the temporal penalty for sin for anyone who performed a certain act of piety. The viewing of relics (such as those assembled by Luther’s prince, Elector Frederick III of Saxony [1463–1525] and displayed twice a year in the Castle Church in Wittenberg), mak- ing a pilgrimage to a saint’s shrine, being in attendance at the annual celebration of a church’s dedication, and many other activities had indul- gences attached to them. The other kind of indulgence was a full, or plenary indulgence, attached especially to the apostles and their holy sites, and offering the remission of all one’s temporal punishment for all sins committed up until the time the indulgence was received. It was Portrait by Raphael (1483–1520) of Pope Leo X and his cousins, under the exclusive aegis of the pope. cardinals Giulio de’ Medici and Luigi de’ Rossi. Pope Urban II (c. 1042–1099) offered the first such indulgence in 1095 for those who participated in the Cru- sades for religious reasons (namely, to wrest the holy sites in Jerusalem from the control of the “infidel”). In 1300 Pope Boniface VIII (c. 1235–1303) offered a “Jubilee Indulgence” for those who made a pilgrimage to the shrines of the apos- tles in Rome. Although these were originally to be offered every century, this indulgence soon became available every twenty-five years. In time, other such plenary indulgences came to be offered not just for religious acts but also for the financial support of such acts. In 1476 Pope Sixtus IV (1414–1484) first allowed indulgences to be applied to souls in purgatory. The 95 Theses 17 Indeed, the practice often outran the theological argu- ments, so that the source of such churchly indulgence— given the widespread belief that for the sake of divine justice satisfaction for every sin must be made—finally came to rest in a “treasury of merits” accumulated by Christ and saints. The pope, by virtue of having been given the keys to heaven by Christ (Matt. 16:19), could open this “treasury” to the faithful purchaser of an indulgence. Pope Clement VI (1291– 1352) formally attached this treasury to indulgences.c The History of the 95 Theses By the late Middle Ages, indulgences had become a central part of piety for many people in the Western church. It was also a useful means of financial support for a cash-strapped papacy, so that indulgence preaching was labeled a sacrum Jacob Fugger, head of the negotium (holy business). When Leo X (1475–1521) pro- Augsburg banking family. claimed a plenary “Peter’s Indulgence” in 1515, the stated reason was to raise money to rebuild the Basilica of Sts. Peter and Paul in Rome—the Renaissance result of which may still be seen today. It is true that half of the money raised was to go to the Augsburg banking family, the Fuggers, in order to pay a debt owed by the archbishop of Mainz, Albrecht von Brandenburg (1490–1545), who had used the loan to pay Rome for the right to hold multiple sees (including arch- bishop of Magdeburg and administrator of the diocese of Halberstadt) upon his accession to the see in Mainz.5 But 5.