Impact and Sustainability of Low-Head Drip Irrigation Kits, in the Semi-Arid Gwanda and Beitbridge Districts, Mzingwane Catchment, Limpopo Basin, Zimbabwe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 31 (2006) 885–892 www.elsevier.com/locate/pce Impact and sustainability of low-head drip irrigation kits, in the semi-arid Gwanda and Beitbridge Districts, Mzingwane Catchment, Limpopo Basin, Zimbabwe Richard Moyo a,*, David Love b,c, Marloes Mul a,d, Walter Mupangwa c, Steve Twomlow c a Department of Civil Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe b WaterNet, P.O. Box MP600, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe c ICRISAT Bulawayo, Matopos Research Station, P.O. Box 776 Bulawayo, Zimbabwe d UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, P.O. Box 3015, 2601 DA, Delft, The Netherlands Abstract Resource-poor smallholder farmers in the semi-arid Gwanda and Beitbridge districts face food insecurity on an annual basis due to a combination of poor and erratic rainfall (average 500 mm/a and 345 mm/a, respectively, for the period 1970–2003) and technologies inappropriate to their resource status. This impacts on both household livelihoods and food security. In an attempt to improve food security in the catchment a number of drip kit distribution programmes have been initiated since 2003 as part of an on-going global initiative aimed at 2 million poor households per year. A number of recent studies have assessed the technical performance of the drip kits in-lab and in-field. In early 2005 a study was undertaken to assess the impacts and sustainability of the drip kit programme. Representatives of the NGOs, local government, traditional leadership and agricultural extension officers were interviewed. Focus group discussions with ben- eficiaries and other villagers were held at village level. A survey of 114 households was then conducted in two districts, using a question- naire developed from the output of the interviews and focus group discussions. The results from the study showed that the NGOs did not specifically target the distribution of the drip kits to poor members of the community (defined for the purpose of the study as those not owning cattle). Poor households made up 54% of the beneficiaries. This poor targeting of vulnerable households could have been a result of conditions set by some implementing NGOs that beneficiaries must have an assured water source. On the other hand, only 2% of the beneficiaries had used the kit to produce the expected 5 harvests over the 2 years, owing to problems related to water shortage, access to water and also pests and diseases. About 51% of the respondents had produced at least 3 harvests and 86% produced at least 2 harvests. Due to water shortages during the dry season 61% of production with the drip kit occurred during the wet season. This suggests that most households use the drip kits as supplementary irrigation. Conflicts between beneficiaries and water point committees or other water users developed in some areas especially during the dry season. The main finding from this study was that low cost drip kit programs can only be a sustainable intervention if implemented as an integral part of a long-term development program, not short-term relief programs and the programme should involve a broad range of stakeholders. A first step in any such program, especially in water scarce areas such as Gwanda and Beitbridge, is a detailed analysis of the existing water resources to assess availability and potential conflicts, prior to distribution of drip kits. Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Access to water; Drip kits; Intervention targeting; Sustainable intervention; Water availability * Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Land and Water Resources Management, Midlands State University, P. Bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe. Tel.: +263 11 719515; fax: +263 54 26233. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (R. Moyo), [email protected], [email protected] (D. Love), mul@ eng.uz.ac.zw, [email protected] (M. Mul), [email protected] (W. Mupangwa), [email protected] (S. Twomlow). 1474-7065/$ - see front matter Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2006.08.020 886 R. Moyo et al. / Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 31 (2006) 885–892 1. Introduction efficient utilization of drip kits. The enabling conditions include availability of spares, technical and agronomic sup- Small-scale farmers are the largest population group in port, and continuing availability of a minimum water the agriculture sector of most developing countries and requirement. Access to and adequacy of good water quality are now perceived as key players in increasing global food surface and ground water was also deemed important for production and achieving food security (Frausto, 2000). sustainable use of the kits. It also recommended that the In the past, it was thought that large-scale irrigation water source for the drip kit should be within 15–30 m of schemes could help overcome production shortfalls in these the garden. These conditions are important in light of the regions. Unfortunately, few of the large-scale schemes have fact that kits are supposed to be used through out the year. met the ambitious targets identified at their conception (e.g. For efficient utilization, recipient households are supposed Samakande et al., 2004; Senzanje et al., 2003). The cost of to grow up to three cycles of crops per year, including at least continued maintenance are often not met, and a large num- one cycle of vegetable crops, for Zimbabwe this is in the win- ber of schemes throughout Zimbabwe, and for that matter ter dry season and early maize or bean crop at the start of the much of sub-Saharan Africa, have been identified by the wet season, which can be harvested in December. Ministry of Water Resources and Infrastructure Develop- Since 2003 the LEAD program in Zimbabwe has distrib- ment as requiring rehabilitation to allow for better utiliza- uted over 20,000 low-head drip irrigation kits to food-inse- tion of existing irrigation potential (Mutezo, 2005). cure families for developing household nutrition gardens. Furthermore, many dams developed for irrigation purposes More than 1000 such kits have been distributed to rural are heavily under-utilized (Love et al., 2005; Mutezo, 2005). households in Gwanda and Beitbridge Districts. This has A global initiative on drip kit distribution has been devel- the potential to impact both on household livelihoods oped for smallholder irrigation by the USAID Linkages for and on national food security. The LEAD program worked the Economic Advancement of the Disadvantaged (LEAD) with more than six Non-Government Organizations project. This initiative is expected to benefit 30 million poor (NGOs) in the distribution of the drip kits in the two dis- households around the globe (2 million per year) by 2015 tricts. Each NGO developed its own targeting criteria for and should bring 1 million hectares under irrigated cultiva- beneficiaries in their respective communities and their tion over the next 15 years (Hussain et al., 2002). The focus own training/support programs. on upgrading smallholder agriculture is essential, since Several lab and on-farm studies have been carried out in smallholder farmers make up around half of the food inse- Zimbabwe on the technical evaluations of the drip kit perfor- cure population of the World (FAO, 2004). mance including how it affects crop yield and water produc- The low-head drip kit can irrigate around 100 m2 as tivity (Chigerwe et al., 2004; Maisiri et al., 2005; Nkala, 2003; shown in Fig. 1. The capacity of the drum (tank) is normally Senzanje, 1997, 1998; Senzanje et al., 2003, 2004). From 100–200 l, and it must be filled once or twice a day. The these studies it was found that low cost drip systems had a drum must be placed at a height of 1–2 m above ground, potential to be beneficially adopted by smallholder farmers. to provide the required pressure. Water then flows from To complement the existing work on the technical the drum into 10–30 m long drip-lines, in which emitters performance of drip kits, this study was carried out to assess are regularly spaced to release water (Chigerwe et al., 2004). the impacts and sustainability of the drip kit program imple- A number of studies have been undertaken in Asia (e.g. mented by a range of NGOs in the Mzingwane Catchment, Behr and Naik, 1999; Westarp et al., 2004) to assess the Zimbabwe, in relation to water availability, access to water, requirements for effective distribution and sustainable and utilization of the kits and the targeting of beneficiaries. The Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a drip kit (Keller, 2004). R. Moyo et al. / Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 31 (2006) 885–892 887 study also explored the conflicts arising due to the use of most active in the distribution of drip kits. In Gwanda water from existing water sources for drip kits. the study was done in Wards 14, 17 and 18 while in Beit- bridge the study was done in Wards 4, 5, 6 and 7. These wards had received the highest number of drip kits distrib- 2. Materials and methods uted by the NGOs namely Intermediate Technology Devel- opment Group (ITDG), Hlekweni, Lutheran Development 2.1. Study area Services (LDS), Dabane, Compassion Ministries, Mvura- manzi and World Vision. The selected wards were also in The study area is a semi-arid area of southern Zimba- the drier parts of the districts, where the impact of such bwe, with a mean annual rainfall of between 500 mm/a at technology would be expected to be higher. West Nicholson near Gwanda in the northern area, to The districts of Gwanda and Beitbridge have a combined 345 mm/a at Beitbridge in the southern area (derived from population of over 220,000 and had an average growth rate rainfall records from 1970 to 2003).