DOCSLIB.ORG

Estimation of Biomass Potential in Odesa Oblast Report #3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estimation of Biomass Potential in Odesa Oblast Report #3 Estimation of biomass potential in Odesa oblast Report #3 Selection of biomass feedstock and technologies for energy production in conditions of Kylyysky and Shyryayvsky rayons. Recommendations for the implementation of the most effective types of bioenergy projects. February, 2017 1 Contractor: Biomass Carbon Zhelyabov str., 2A, of. 116 Kyiv, Ukraine Tel.: +380 44 332 91 40 «BIOMASS-CARBON» LTD Contact person: Tetiana Zheliezna [email protected] International expert and reviewer: IZES Altenkesseler Str. 17, Geb. A1 D-66115 Saarbrücken Tel.: +49 681 9762-840, -170 Contact person: Bernhard Wern [email protected] Contract giver: GIZ Contact person: Volodymyr Peregudov Tel.: +38 044 594 07 63 [email protected] 2 Content Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Description of Kylyysky and Shyryayvsky rayons of Odesa oblast ....................................................................... 6 1.1. General description of estimated rayons .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Current situation and principal trends in the energy sector ........................................................................... 8 Kylyysky rayon .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Shyryayvsky rayon .................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.3. Relevant stakeholders ........................................................................................................................................... 16 2. Biomass and effective ways of its use for energy production ................................................................................ 17 2.1. Methodology for the assessment of biomass potential ......................................................................................... 17 2.2. Energy potential of biomass in Odesa oblast and in Kylyysky and Shyryayvsky rayons .................................... 18 2.2.1. Evaluation of the biomass potential for energy use in the Odesa oblast ....................................................... 18 Primary agricultural residues ................................................................................................................................... 18 Residues of the processing industry ......................................................................................................................... 23 Wood biomass .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 Biogas from the manure ........................................................................................................................................... 26 Energy crops for solid biomass and biogas production ............................................................................................ 27 Reed.......................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Biogas from solid waste landfills .............................................................................................................................. 28 Total energy potential of biomass in Odesa oblast .................................................................................................. 29 2.2.2. Potential assessment of biomass for energy needs in Kylyysky rayon ........................................................... 30 2.2.3. Assessment of biomass potential for energy purposes in Shyryayvsky rayon ............................................... 36 2.3. Characteristics of biomass for energy use............................................................................................................ 42 2.3.1. Primary agricultural residues.......................................................................................................................... 43 2.3.2. Processing industry residues .......................................................................................................................... 46 2.3.3. Biomass of energy crops ................................................................................................................................. 49 2.3.4. Common reed ................................................................................................................................................. 51 2.3.5. Biomass for biogas production ....................................................................................................................... 52 2.4. Preferred technologies for energy production from biomass .............................................................................. 53 2.4.1. Prioritizing of biomass feedstock types .......................................................................................................... 53 2.4.2. Review of logistics and selection of effective biomass supply chains ............................................................ 54 2.4.3. The choice of biomass to energy technologies .............................................................................................. 64 Biomass combustion technologies .......................................................................................................................... 64 Biogas production technologies .............................................................................................................................. 68 Selection of priority technology .............................................................................................................................. 69 3. Preliminary recommendations for the implementation of several most effective types of bioenergy projects in Kylyysky and Shyryayvsky rayons of Odesa oblast .................................................................................................... 69 Suggested timetable for the implementation of the recommended bioenergy projects ........................................ 71 Typical ToR for carrying out techno-economic assessment of the recommended bioenergy projects ................... 73 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................................... 76 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................ 79 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................................................... 80 Annex А. Administrative and territorial structure of rayons ...................................................................................... 81 Table А.1. Administrative and territorial structure of Kylyysky rayon ...................................................................... 81 3 Table А.2. Administrative and territorial structure of Shyryayvsky rayon ................................................................ 83 Annex B. List of state-financed and private institutions for potential introduction of bioenergy projects ................. 87 Table B.1. Potential consumers of biofuels – institutions of social sphere with the heating area of >1000 м2 (Kylyysky rayon, Odesa oblast) .................................................................................................................................... 87 Table B.2. Potential consumers of biofuels – institutions of social sphere with the heating area of >1000 м2 (Shyryayvsky rayon, Odesa oblast)86 ........................................................................................................................... 89 Table B.3. Potential consumers of biofuels – private companies of Kylyysky and Shyryayvsky rayons ................... 91 Annex C. ROAD MAP for performing the project on the estimation of biomass potential in Odesa oblast ................ 92 Annex D. Methodology for the assessment of biomass potential in Kylyysky and Shyryayvsky rayons of Odesa oblast .................................................................................................................................................................................. 93 Annex E. Database of producers and suppliers of biomass for energy ..................................................................... 101 Table E.1. List of agricultural companies-producers and potential suppliers of biomass in Kylyysky rayon with the economic potential of biomass for energy of > 100 toe (data of 2016) .................................................................... 101 Table E.2. List of procurement and processing enterprises that are potential suppliers of biomass in Kylyysky rayon ........................................................................................................................................................................... 104 Table E.3. List of producers of solid biofuels in Kylyysky rayon ............................................................................. 105 Table E.4. List of agricultural enterprises
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case of Ukraine
    LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Northern Dimension Research Centre Publication 6 Tauno Tiusanen, Oksana Ivanova, Daria Podmetina EU’S NEW NEIGHBOURS: THE CASE OF UKRAINE Lappeenranta University of Technology Northern Dimension Research Centre P.O.Box 20, FIN-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland Telephone: +358-5-621 11 Telefax: +358-5-621 2644 URL: www.lut.fi/nordi Lappeenranta 2004 ISBN 951-764-896-0 (paperback) ISBN 951-764-897-9 (PDF) ISSN 1459-6679 EU’s New Neighbours: The Case of Ukraine Tauno Tiusanen Oksana Ivanova Daria Podmetina 1 Contents LIST OF TABLES 2 FOREWORD 4 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC TRENDS 2.1. Economic Growth and Stability in the Early Period of Transition 6 2.2. Investment and Productivity 9 2.3. Living Standard 11 2.4. Current Economic Trends 15 2.5. Distribution of Incomes and Household Expenditures 16 3. UKRAINE: HISTORY, GEOGRAPHY, ECONOMY AND POLITICS 3.1. Geographic Location, Climate and Natural Resources 20 3.2. Political System and Regions 22 3.3. History of Ukraine 24 3.4. Economic History and Reforms 26 4. INVESTMENT CLIMATE IN UKRAINE 4.1 Foreign Direct Investment in Ukraine 34 4.2. Motives and Obstacles for FDI in Ukraine 37 4.3. Ukraine in International Ratings 40 4.4. The Legal Framework for FDIs 43 4.5. Special Economic Zones 45 5. THE INVESTMENT RATING OF UKRAINIAN REGIONS 5.1. FDIs by Regions 49 5.2. The Investment Rating of Ukrainian Regions 50 5.3. Description of Ukrainian Regions 52 6. FDI SCENE IN UKRAINE: BUSINESS EXAMPLES 6.1. FDI Strategies 72 6.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease in the Southern Ukraine
    — !!!cifra_MNJ_№5_(tom16)_2020 01.07. Белоусова 07.07.Евдокимова ОРИГІНАЛЬНІ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ /ORIGINAL RESEARCHES/ UDC 616.858-036.22 DOI: 10.22141/2224-0713.16.5.2020.209248 I.V. Hubetova Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital, Odesa, Ukraine Odessa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease in the Southern Ukraine Abstract. Background. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a slowly progressing neurodegenerative disease with accumulation of alpha-synuclein and the formation of Lewy bodies inside nerve cells. The prevalence of PD ranges from 100 to 200 cases per 100,000 population. However, in the Ukrainian reality, many cases of the disease remain undiagnosed, which affects the statistical indicators of incidence and prevalence. The purpose of the study is to compare PD epidemiological indices in the Southern Ukraine with all-Ukrainian rates. Material and methods. Statistical data of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, public health departments of Odesa, Mykolaiv and Kherson regions for 2015–2017 were analyzed. There were used the methods of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. Results. Average prevalence of PD in Ukraine is 67.5 per 100,000 population — it is close to the Eastern European rate. The highest prevalence was registered in Lviv (142.5 per 100,000), Vinnytsia (135.9 per 100,000), Cherkasy (108.6 per 100,000) and Kyiv (107.1 per 100,000) regions. The lowest rates were in Luhansk (37.9 per 100,000), Kyrovohrad (42.5 per 100,000), Chernivtsi (49.0 per 100,000) and Ternopil (49.6 per 100,000) regions. In the Southern Ukraine, the highest prevalence of PD was found in Mykolaiv region.
    [Show full text]
  • Odessa Intercultural Profile
    City of Odessa Intercultural Profile This report is based upon the visit of the CoE expert team on 30 June & 1 July 2017, comprising Irena Guidikova, Kseniya Khovanova-Rubicondo and Phil Wood. It should ideally be read in parallel with the Council of Europe’s response to Odessa’s ICC Index Questionnaire but, at the time of writing, the completion of the Index by the City Council is still a work in progress. 1. Introduction Odessa (or Odesa in Ukrainian) is the third most populous city of Ukraine and a major tourism centre, seaport and transportation hub located on the northwestern shore of the Black Sea. Odessa is also an administrative centre of the Odessa Oblast and has been a multiethnic city since its formation. The predecessor of Odessa, a small Tatar settlement, was founded in 1440 and originally named Hacıbey. After a period of Lithuanian control, it passed into the domain of the Ottoman Sultan in 1529 and remained in Ottoman hands until the Empire's defeat in the Russo-Turkish War of 1792. In 1794, the city of Odessa was founded by decree of the Empress Catherine the Great. From 1819 to 1858, Odessa was a free port, and then during the twentieth century it was the most important port of trade in the Soviet Union and a Soviet naval base and now holds the same prominence within Ukraine. During the 19th century, it was the fourth largest city of Imperial Russia, and its historical architecture has a style more Mediterranean than Russian, having been heavily influenced by French and Italian styles.
    [Show full text]
  • Yaroslav KICHUK Tetyana SHEVCHUK PUBLIC
    Yaroslav KICHUK Tetyana SHEVCHUK PUBLIC MOVEMENT OF THE NATIONAL MINORITIES IN BUDZHAK POLIETHNIC SOCIETY AS A FACTOR OF INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION (PERIOD OF INDEPENDENT UKRAINE) - Abstract - The article deals with the revival of civil society institutions, cultural activities of national minorities and people-to-people diplomacy of national and cultural public organizations in Budzhak – the Ukrainian region, located between the Dniester and the Danube deltas, bordering on Romania and Moldova. A significant increase in ethnic consciousness, as well as a sharp focus of regional communities on the preservation and development of their national languages and cultural traditions has been observed in the territory of the Budzhak frontier since the late 1980s. The imperative for the development of the Ukrainian post-imperial transformational society in Budzhak has been the synergy of activities of the Albanian, Bulgarian, Gagauze, German, Greek, Jew, Polish, Romanian (Moldovan), Russian, Ukrainian etc. national minorities with the purpose of developing their language and culture (traditions, rituals and beliefs, art and song, folk crafts) and preserving the cultural identity of their ethnic groups. To gain mutual understanding in interethnic relations, the representatives of national diasporas, together with the local educational establishments, take great pains to create optimal conditions for the development of all national minorities, pay enormous attention to educational activities aimed at raising the historical memory of the peoples of Budzhak, promote intercultural dialogue and tolerance as necessary prerequisites for living in multicultural society. Keywords: national minorities; development of local communities; civil society institutions; national and cultural public organizations; non- Izmail State University of Humanities, Ukraine ([email protected]), ORCID: 0000-0003- 0931-1211.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • 8/30/12 Bessarabia Business Directory of 1924 This Database
    8/30/12 Bessarabia Business Directory of 1924 This database contains records of grocers, teachers, local officials, stone carvers, butchers, bakers, innkeepers, lawyers, peddlers, rabbis, and many others who worked in the early 1920s in Romania's eastern counties, formerly in Bessarabia, and who apparently were Jewish. The information was published in the "Socec" Annuary of the Great-Roumania, dated 1924-1925, by the prominent Romanian publishing house Socec & Co. The Library of Congress calls the two- volume set a historic address book that "stands as the most complete survey of Greater Romania during the interwar period." http://www.loc.gov/rr/european/phonero/romfondr.html We extracted "Jewish-sounding" names listed for cities, towns, villages and hamlets in the nine counties that formed the Bessarabia region of pre-World War I Imperial Russia. They were: No. of localities No. of County or City in list records in list Population (1924) Bălți (Baltsi) 100 983 372,012 Balti (Baltsi) 135 22,000 Sculeni 102 2,094 Parlita (Parlitsa) 94 1,350 Rascani (Rishkani) 50 2,980 Falesti (Faleshti) 49 2,640 Alexandreni 47 900 Cahul (Kagul) 28 253 147,266 Cahul 92 12,000 Leovo (Leova) 37 3,442 Cetatea Alba 56 1,391 374,806 Cetatea Alba (Akkerman) (Bilhorod- Dnistrovskyy) 606 33,900 Tarutino (Tarutyne) 167 6,087 Tatar-Bunar 140 9,898 Arciz-Vechi (Artsyz) 82 2,577 Bairamcea 72 5,000 Starocazaci (Starocazache) 28 6,373 Sarata 22 4,380 Chișinau (Kishinev) (not incl. capital) 76 575 395,596 Ciuciuleni 51 7,280 Hancesti (Hincesti) 122 6,608 Nisporeni 54 6,000
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Zone Dynamics - As a Result of Changes at the Border of Three Environments
    EGU21-5194 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-5194 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Coastal zone dynamics - as a result of changes at the border of three environments Oleksii Batyrev, Olga Andrianova, Radomir Belevich, and Michael Skipa Hydroacoustic Branch of Institute of Geophysics of NAS of Ukraine Coastal zone research is becoming increasingly important because the impact of climate change is most significant here. The state of coastal regions is determined by the variability in three contact media (geological, water, and air). Evaluation of level changes on the coasts of various parts of the World Ocean (the Mediterranean, Black, Baltic and North Seas, and the Atlantic coasts in Brazil and France) over a long period of time shows various fluctuations with an upward trend in recent decades. To highlight the factors that determine the seashores' level fluctuations, three contact media parameters were considered on the example of the western part of the Black Sea. Calculations, analysis, and comparison of trends in the variability of hydrometeorological characteristics (air and water temperatures, precipitation, and river discharge) and sea level over a period of more than 100 years have been carried out. To assess the intensity of fluctuations of the coastal land along the western coast of the Black Sea, the series of level heights were considered at 6 Ukrainian stations: Vylkove, Chornomorsk (Ilyichevsk), Odesa-port, port Yuzhne, Ochakiv and Sevastopol (partially used as a benchmark), at 2 stations on the Romanian coast: Constanta and Sulina, and 2 stations on the Bulgarian coast: Burgas and Varna.
    [Show full text]
  • Memories for a Blessing Jewish Mourning Rituals and Commemorative Practices in Postwar Belarus and Ukraine, 1944-1991
    Memories for a Blessing Jewish Mourning Rituals and Commemorative Practices in Postwar Belarus and Ukraine, 1944-1991 by Sarah Garibov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in University of Michigan 2017 Doctoral Committee: Professor Ronald Suny, Co-Chair Professor Jeffrey Veidlinger, Co-Chair Emeritus Professor Todd Endelman Professor Zvi Gitelman Sarah Garibov [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5417-6616 © Sarah Garibov 2017 DEDICATION To Grandma Grace (z”l), who took unbounded joy in the adventures and accomplishments of her grandchildren. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I am forever indebted to my remarkable committee. The faculty labor involved in producing a single graduate is something I have never taken for granted, and I am extremely fortunate to have had a committee of outstanding academics and genuine mentshn. Jeffrey Veidlinger, thank you for arriving at Michigan at the perfect moment and for taking me on mid-degree. From the beginning, you have offered me a winning balance of autonomy and accountability. I appreciate your generous feedback on my drafts and your guidance on everything from fellowships to career development. Ronald Suny, thank you for always being a shining light of positivity and for contributing your profound insight at all the right moments. Todd Endelman, thank you for guiding me through modern Jewish history prelims with generosity and rigor. You were the first to embrace this dissertation project, and you have faithfully encouraged me throughout the writing process. Zvi Gitelman, where would I be without your wit and seykhl? Thank you for shepherding me through several tumultuous years and for remaining a steadfast mentor and ally.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel Liberman Research Director Brookline, MA Katrina A. Krzysztofiak Laura Raybin Miller Program Manager Pembroke Pines, FL Patricia Hoglund Vincent Obsitnik Administrative Officer McLean, VA 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1160 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: ( 202) 254-3824 Fax: ( 202) 254-3934 E-mail: [email protected] May 30, 2005 Message from the Chairman One of the principal missions that United States law assigns the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad is to identify and report on cemeteries, monuments, and historic buildings in Central and Eastern Europe associated with the cultural heritage of U.S. citizens, especially endangered sites. The Congress and the President were prompted to establish the Commission because of the special problem faced by Jewish sites in the region: The communities that had once cared for the properties were annihilated during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialized and Multidisciplinary Scientific Researches  Volume 3
    December 11, 2020 Amsterdam, The Netherland 7 . SECTION ІV. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND ECOLOGY DOI 10.36074/11.12.2020.v3.01 INPUT OF UNINTENTIONALLY PRODUCED PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS IN WATER BODIES WITH SAWAGE WATERS OF ODESSA INDUSTRIAL-AND-URBAN AGGLOMERATION ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6667-2457 Vladyslav Mykhailenko PhD student of Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection Odessa State Environmental University SCIENTIFIC ADVISER: ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0928-5121 Tamerlan Safranov Dr. Sc. (Geology), Professor, Head of Ecology and Environmental Protection Department Odessa State Environmental University UKRAINE In [1] we demonstrated the relevance of the issue of marine pollution of the North-Western part of the Black Sea by Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), in particular – produced unintentionally. А significant contribution to marine pollution is made by the Odessa Industrial-And-Urban Agglomeration (IUA). Today the Odessa IUA is the largest agglomeration located on the Black Sea coast and includes Odessa, Chornomorsk, Yuzhne, Teplodar and Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi. One of the main sources of input of POPs in the marine environment is the sewage waters discharge, so we considered the input of these substances into the marine environment with the sewage waters discharge by Odessa IUA. Sewage waters discharge, which are formed in the household sector and at industrial facilities, is treated at the city sewerage system. According to [2], sewage waters – untreated and treated at active sludge plant, are a source of constant input of unintentionally produced POPs in the environment. In all cities of the Odessa IUA, waste waters are treated at active sludge plant. During the sewage water treatment at the active sludge plant, the formation of new POPs does not occur, but the existing POPs are redistributed between the sewage waters and waste activated sludge.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Geology, Geography And
    ISSN 2617-2909 (print) Journal of Geology, ISSN 2617-2119 (online) Geography and Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology Geology, 28(4), 747–756. Journal home page: geology-dnu-dp.ua doi: 10.15421/111970 Vitaliy A. Sych, Victoria V. Yavorska, Igor V. Hevko, Katherine V. Kolomiyets, Inna M. Shorobura Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology, 28(4), 747–756. Features of territorial organization of population resettlement of the coastal strip of the Ukrainian Black Sea Region Vitaliy A. Sych1 , Victoria V. Yavorska1, Igor V. Hevko2, Katherine V. Kolomiyets1, Inna M. Shorobura3 1Odesa I .I. Mechnykov National University, Odesa, Ukraine, [email protected] 2Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine 3Khmelnytskyi Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy, Ukraine Received: 07.05.2019 Abstract. This article deals with the features of population settlement within the Ukrainian Received in revised form: 21.05.2019 Black Sea region and its coastal zone. It is emphasized that the problems of coastal Accepted: 17.11.2019 resettlement, the factors that determine it, are highlighted in the works of foreign and Ukrainian scientists. The purpose of the work is to find out the features of the population settlement in the region of the Ukrainian Black Sea region. In the studied region, due to the territorial differentiation of economic activity, change in the intensity of economic use of the territory and the population density can be distinguished by the coastal, middle and peripheral economic zones. It was established that the supporting framework of urban settlement in the Ukrainian Black Sea region is characterized by a fairly sparse network, and the settlement process itself is in many respects still in the stage of formation, incompleteness.
    [Show full text]