DOCSLIB.ORG

A National Network of Neurotechnology Centers for the BRAIN Initiative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A National Network of Neurotechnology Centers for the BRAIN Initiative Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title A National Network of Neurotechnology Centers for the BRAIN Initiative. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/42j6287v Journal Neuron, 88(3) ISSN 0896-6273 Authors Alivisatos, A Paul Chun, Miyoung Church, George M et al. Publication Date 2015-11-01 DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.015 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Neuron NeuroView A National Network of Neurotechnology Centers for the BRAIN Initiative A. Paul Alivisatos,1 Miyoung Chun,2 George M. Church,3,7 Ralph J. Greenspan,4 Michael L. Roukes,5,8,* and Rafael Yuste6,9,* 1Kavli Energy NanoSciences Institute, Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 2The Kavli Foundation, Oxnard, CA 93030, USA 3Department of Genetics and Wyss Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA 4Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, and Neurobiology Section/Division of Biology, UCSD, La Jolla, CA 92093-0115, USA 5Physics, Applied Physics, & Bioengineering and The Kavli Nanoscience Institute, Caltech, Pasadena, CA USA 92093-0126, USA 6Neurotechnology Center, Departments of Biological Sciences and Neuroscience, Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA 7Twitter: @geochurch 8Twitter: @attoboy 9Twitter: @yusterafa *Correspondence: [email protected] (M.L.R.), [email protected] (R.Y.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.015 We propose the creation of a national network of neurotechnology centers to enhance and accelerate the BRAIN Initiative and optimally leverage the effort and creativity of individual laboratories involved in it. As ‘‘brain observatories,’’ these centers could provide the critical interdisciplinary environment both for realizing ambitious and complex technologies and for providing individual investigators with access to them. Progress in science depends on of physical scientists and engineers to Initiative are yielding significant accom- new techniques, new discoveries, closely unite with neuroscientists in order plishments that can serve as important and new ideas, probably in that to jointly develop new experimental and elements for future neurotechnology, we order. computational tools for neuroscience. believe that achieving the project’s full Our ideas formed the basis of what potentiality—that is, creating large-scale —Sydney Brenner became the BRAIN Initiative (Insel et al., tools—requires efforts anchored within 2013), a national White House Grand the well-validated center paradigm. It is The BRAIN Initiative Today Challenge that currently involves more our view that the technological challenges In our original proposal for a Brain Activity than one hundred U.S. laboratories and that must be surmounted are sufficiently Map (BAM) Project (Alivisatos et al., numerous regional offshoots. The collec- complex that they are beyond the 2012), we emphasized that the scientific tive tackling of this grand challenge in sci- reach of single-investigator efforts; we understanding of the brain has been ence and technology is already widely believe they can only be tackled through hampered by the limitations of traditional perceived to be a national success and highly coordinated, multi-investigator, methods for recording neuronal activity. an example of U.S. leadership in science cross-disciplinary efforts. Below, we These methods largely measure one and technology. Indeed, since its incep- expand on this proposition, outlining our neuron at a time and thus remain ill-suited tion, similar initiatives have been launched reasons and evidence that implementing for probing complex neural circuits that by other countries; this indicates global a network of neurotechnology centers likely operate at higher, emergent levels consensus about the scientific value and can ensure the success of the BRAIN of functionality. To solve the challenges potential of the Initiative. Initiative. of observing and interacting with neural In this NeuroView perspective, we circuitry at these higher levels of revisit an important component of our National Centers Enable Complex, complexity we pointed to the recent ad- original BAM proposal—one that, if real- Transformational Science vances in nanotechnology, molecular re- ized, will significantly leverage the prog- To illustrate the power of the center para- porters, advanced optical and photonic ress achieved by the BRAIN Initiative. digm, we cite three recent and significant systems, and large-scale semiconductor Specifically, we wish to reemphasize the scientific achievements in the biomedical integration. These fields are now suffi- development of a coordinated, national and physical sciences that have been ciently mature to permit their concatena- network of neurotechnology centers, enabled by center-scale efforts. First, we tion into powerful neurotechnologies devoted to the creation and dissemination point to gene-sequencing technology, that will fundamentally transform how of next-generation tools for neuroscience, which has enabled the modern era of ge- neuroscience research is carried out. To neuromedicine, and brain-inspired engi- nomics. Based on previous successes enable this technological coalescence, neering. While the single- or few-investi- with particle accelerators, chromosome we encouraged interdisciplinary teams gator efforts now supported by the BRAIN sorting, and development of computer Neuron 88, November 4, 2015 ª2015 Elsevier Inc. 445 Neuron NeuroView infrastructure, the U.S. Department of such a project is IceCube (Shi et al., ratories to acquire, implement, or Energy first envisioned a national center- 1998), a kilometer-scale neutrino obser- even maintain. Since connectomics based approach for genomics in the vatory at the South Pole that, in 2013, first is an enterprise that requires auto- mid-1980s (Cook-Deegan 1989). It then achieved detection of neutrinos origi- mation and massively parallel data proceeded to fund individual technol- nating outside of our solar system (Aart- acquisition and analysis, it is ogy-oriented laboratories’ efforts to build sen et al., 2015). Its underlying technology sensible for such instruments, or the many initial components essential for was developed, perfected, and assem- even larger future machines, to be developing genome sequencing instru- bled by a highly coordinated network of hosted within one such center to mentation—including improvements to contributing laboratories. These efforts in facilitate research for the entire Sanger sequencing enzymes, fluorescent this network were distributed at various neuroscience community. To this labeling, capillary electrophoresis, etc. points and institutions nationwide but could be added complex future Indeed, it was through subsequent, coor- were coordinated by a National Science instrumentation capable of inte- dinated efforts and partnerships that Foundation-funded center at the Univer- grating connectomics with tran- evolved between two national centers, sity of Wisconsin, Madison. Another scriptomics and cell history, that is, one at Caltech and the other at Applied example is NuStar (Harrison et al., 2013), with developmental lineage and ac- Biosystems, that these individual com- the satellite-based X-ray telescope that tivity (Marblestone et al., 2014). ponents were ultimately concatenated is now beginning to provide astounding Here, candidate technologies may into an integrated technological system new images and insights into black holes also involve specialized super-reso- comprising automated gene sequencing and violent events in the universe’s evolu- lution fluorescent microscopy (Chen instruments, reagents, and software. tion (Perez et al., 2015). NuStar followed a et al., 2015), plus in situ identifica- After evolving through several models, paradigm similar to that of IceCube, in this tion of molecular profiles and the Prism 3700 Sequencer was eventually case through a NASA-funded center led barcodes (Crosetto et al., 2015). upscaled for robust mass production. Its by Caltech astrophysicists. In these, and These complex technologies are, subsequent acquisition by sequencing many other similar examples, the center again, perhaps most appropriate centers worldwide powered the efforts paradigm has harnessed the collaborative for deployment within a center- that culminated in the elucidation of the power of interdisciplinary scientific teams based context. human genome (Springer, 2006). In the to solve critical problems and advance the d Assembly and deployment of ten years following this achievement, frontiers of science. We ask: why should massively multiplexed, implantable the U.S. National Institutes of Health sup- 21st-century neuroscientists continue to electrical or photonic neural nanop- ported an even more aggressive push operate in isolation, when they could robe systems will require large- toward ‘‘next-generation sequencing’’ powerfully organize to tackle major scale semiconductor integration, that ultimately resulted in a million-fold outstanding problems in concert? nanofabrication, robust foundry- improvement in the cost and quality scale production, and big-data of gene sequencing technology. These Scientific Need for National Centers computational resources. If left to breakthroughs resulted in an unantici- for Neurotechnology individual laboratories, these tasks pated economic bonanza: the $3.8 billion We strongly believe that a coordinated cannot be carried out with the level
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNDERSTANDING the BRAIN Tbook Collections
    FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES ARCHIVES UNDERSTANDING THE BRAIN TBook Collections Copyright © 2015 The New York Times Company. All rights reserved. Cover Photograph by Zach Wise for The New York Times This ebook was created using Vook. All of the articles in this work originally appeared in The New York Times. eISBN: 9781508000877 The New York Times Company New York, NY www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com/tbooks Obama Seeking to Boost Study of Human Brain By JOHN MARKOFF FEB. 17, 2013 The Obama administration is planning a decade-long scientific effort to examine the workings of the human brain and build a comprehensive map of its activity, seeking to do for the brain what the Human Genome Project did for genetics. The project, which the administration has been looking to unveil as early as March, will include federal agencies, private foundations and teams of neuroscientists and nanoscientists in a concerted effort to advance the knowledge of the brain’s billions of neurons and gain greater insights into perception, actions and, ultimately, consciousness. Scientists with the highest hopes for the project also see it as a way to develop the technology essential to understanding diseases like Alzheimer’sand Parkinson’s, as well as to find new therapies for a variety of mental illnesses. Moreover, the project holds the potential of paving the way for advances in artificial intelligence. The project, which could ultimately cost billions of dollars, is expected to be part of the president’s budget proposal next month. And, four scientists and representatives of research institutions said they had participated in planning for what is being called the Brain Activity Map project.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Neuron Doctrine to Neural Networks
    LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE LINK TO INITIAL CORRESPONDENCE other hand, one of my mentors, David Tank, argued that for a true understanding of a On testing neural network models neural circuit we should be able to actu- ally build it, which is a stricter definition Rafael Yuste of a successful theory (D. Tank, personal communication) Finally, as mentioned in In my recent Timeline article, I described existing neural network models have enough the Timeline article, one will also need to the emergence of neural network models predictive value to be considered valid or connect neural network models to theories as an important paradigm in neuroscience useful for explaining brain circuits.” (REF. 1)). and facts at the structural and biophysical research (From the neuron doctrine to neu- There are many exciting areas of progress levels of neural circuits and to those in cog- ral networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 487–497 in current neuroscience detailing phenom- nitive sciences as well, for proper ‘scientific (2015))1. In his correspondence (Neural enology that is consistent with some neural knowledge’ to occur in the Kantian sense. networks in the future of neuroscience network models, some of which I tried to research. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. http://dx.doi. summarize and illustrate, but at the same Rafael Yuste is at the Neurotechnology Center and org/10.1038/nrn4042 (2015))2, Rubinov time we are still far from a rigorous demon- Kavli Institute of Brain Sciences, Departments of provides some thoughtful comments about stration of any neural network model with Biological Sciences and Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuit Neuroscience: the Road Ahead
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided byGR ColumbiaAND University CHALLE AcademicNGE Commons Circuit neuroscience: the road ahead Rafael Yuste HHMI, Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, USA Correspondence: [email protected] It is difficult to write about grand challenges in our field without pontificating or pre- tending to show a degree of certainty in assessing the field that I do not possess. I would rather comment on a few of the issues that particularly worry me. Therefore, this article is just a snapshot of our field now, as I see it, and encourage readers to read it as the opinion of just one of their colleagues. My comments are aimed at Circuit Neuroscience. What exactly is Circuit Neuroscience? Rafael Yuste studied Medicine at the Universidad As stated in the mission statement of Frontiers in Neural Circuits, I follow the definition Autonoma and the Fundacion of Circuit Neuroscience as the understanding of the computational function of neural cir- Jimenez Diaz Hospital in Madrid. After a brief period cuits, linking this function with the circuit micro-structure. Within this field, I will address in Sydney Brenner’s group three different types of challenges: scientific, methodological and sociological ones. at the LMB in Cambridge, he obtained his PhD with Larry Katz in Torsten Scientific problems: Wiesel’s laboratory, at I think that it is fair to say that we are profoundly ignorant about the structure and func- Rockefeller University tion of neural circuits. One could say that the goal of our field is to reverse-engineer in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brain Activity Map Project and the Challenge of Functional Connectomics
    Neuron NeuroView The Brain Activity Map Project and the Challenge of Functional Connectomics A. Paul Alivisatos,1 Miyoung Chun,2 George M. Church,3 Ralph J. Greenspan,4 Michael L. Roukes,5 and Rafael Yuste6,* 1Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 2The Kavli Foundation, Oxnard, CA 93030, USA 3Department of Genetics and Wyss Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 4Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, UCSD, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 5Kavli Nanoscience Institute and Departments of Physics, Applied Physics, and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6HHMI, Department Biological Sciences, Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University New York, NY 10027, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.006 The function of neural circuits is an emergent property that arises from the coordinated activity of large numbers of neurons. To capture this, we propose launching a large-scale, international public effort, the Brain Activity Map Project, aimed at reconstructing the full record of neural activity across complete neural circuits. This technological challenge could prove to be an invaluable step toward understanding fundamental and pathological brain processes. ‘‘The behavior of large and com- To explore these jungles, neuroscientists bles. Because of this, measuring emer- plex aggregates of elementary have traditionally relied on electrodes gent functional states, such as dynamical particles, it turns out, is not to be that sample brain activity only very attractors, could be more useful for char- understood in terms of a simple sparsely—from one to a few neurons acterizing the functional properties of a extrapolation of the properties of a within a given region.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Seminar on Computational Neuroscience
    Rafael Yuste (Columbia University, New York) Maria Neimark-Geffen (University of Pennsylvania, Programme https://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/rmy5/ Philadelphia) Rafael Yuste is Professor of Biological Sciences and https://geffenlab.weebly.com/maria.html Neuroscience at Columbia University. He was born in Maria is interested in the way the brain encodes 16:30 – Welcome and Madrid, where he obtained his MD at the Universidad information about the world around us and how our Autónoma. After a brief period in Sydney Brenner's perception is shaped by our emotional state and El Ministerio de Economía, Industria presentation of Cajal Institute laboratory in Cambridge, UK, he performed Ph.D. studies experience. She combines computational and y Competitividad y la Agencia (Juan José Garrido, Cajal with Larry Katz in Torsten Wiesel’s laboratory at biological approaches to study the mechanisms Estatal de Investigación, en Rockefeller University and was a postdoctoral student of behind dynamic auditory perception, memory and Institute, CSIC, Spain) David Tank at Bell Labs. In 1996 he joined the learning. Maria first got interested in systems colaboración con National Department of Biological Sciences at Columbia University, neuroscience through her undergraduate thesis under Science Foundation (NSF) y where he is Full Professor. In 2005 he became HHMI mentorship of John Hopfield at Princeton University, in National Institutes of Health 16:45 – Rafael Yuste Investigator and co-director of the Kavli Institute for Brain which she explored the mechanics of whisking in rats. Circuits and in 2014 Director of the Neurotechnology She studied texture encoding in the somatosensory (NIH), se complacen en invitarles Center at Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae PERSONAL INFORMATION Name: Germán Sumbre Family Status: Married Plus Two Children Place of Birth: Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Curriculum Vitae PERSONAL INFORMATION Name: Germán Sumbre Family status: Married plus two children Place of birth: Buenos Aires, Argentina. ORCID number: 0000-0003-4436-6840 Telephone: +33 (0)1 44 32 23 67 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.zebrain.biologie.ens.fr EDUCATION 2010 Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches (HDR). Diploma required to supervise PhD students Université Descartes - Paris V, France. Neurosciences. 1998-2004 Ph.D. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Brain Sciences and Behavior. Topic: Motor control of the octopus arm movement. Advisor: Prof. Binyamin Hochner. 1995-1997 Army service 1991-1994 B.Sc. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Biology. Topic: Wing-beat coupling among flying locusts. Advisor : Prof. Jeff Camhi. POSITIONS 2009- Director of Research class 2, INSERM. France. 2008- Group leader, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris. France. Avenir team. 2004-2008 Postdoctoral fellow. University of California Berkeley. USA. Topic: Neural basis of perceptual memory of time interval in zebrafish. Advisor : Prof. Mu-Ming Poo. JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS 1. Privat, M.; and Sumbre G. (2020) Naturalistic Behavior: The Zebrafish Larva Strikes Back.Current Biology. 30(1): R27-R29. 2. Privat, M., Romano, S. A., Pietri, T., Jouary, A., Boulanger-Weill, J., Elbaz, N., Duchemin, A., Soares, D., Sumbre G. (2019). Sensorimotor Transformations in the Zebrafish Auditory System. Current Biology. 29(23):4010-4023.e4. 3. Boulanger-Weill, J.; and Sumbre G. Functional integration of newborn neurons in the zebrafish optic tectum. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 7: 57. 2019. 4. Ponce-Alvarez, A.; Jouary, A.; Privat, M.; Deco, G.; and Sumbre G. (2018) Whole-Brain Neuronal Activity Displays Crackling Noise Dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience Thinks Big Bring Them Together in a Unified View
    PERSPECTIVES VIEWPOINT new computing technologies. Neuroscience is like the infant brain — it is flooded with data and theories but lacks the ability to Neuroscience thinks big bring them together in a unified view. We pin our hopes on more and more data with- (and collaboratively) out realizing that experiments can only give us a small fraction of what we need. The Eric R. Kandel, Henry Markram, Paul M. Matthews, Rafael Yuste and attempt to reconstruct the human brain as a computer model can provide a new focus Christof Koch for neuroscience and for clinical and tech- Abstract | Despite cash-strapped times for research, several ambitious collaborative nological research. It will help us to ‘clean neuroscience projects have attracted large amounts of funding and media up’ conflicting reports and teach us how to apply knowledge from animal studies to attention. In Europe, the Human Brain Project aims to develop a large-scale understanding the human brain. Ultimately, computer simulation of the brain, whereas in the United States, the Brain Activity it will allow us to discover the fundamental Map is working towards establishing a functional connectome of the entire brain, principles governing brain structure and and the Allen Institute for Brain Science has embarked upon a 10‑year project to function and to predictively reconstruct understand the mouse visual cortex (the MindScope project). US President Barack the brain from fragments of experimental data. Without this kind of understanding, Obama’s announcement of the BRAIN Initiative (Brain Research through Advancing we will continue to struggle to develop new Innovative Neurotechnologies Initiative) in April 2013 highlights the political treatments and brain-inspired computing commitment to neuroscience and is expected to further foster interdisciplinary technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Ethical Priorities for Neurotechnologies and AI
    COMMENT HISTORY Two centuries of EXPLORATION On the trail of FUNDING African grant-giving OBITUARY Vladimir Voevodsky, distorting publication an ill-fated expedition to bodies need more data to pioneer in algebraic geometry metrics p.163 map the Arctic p.166 guide investments p.168 and computer proofs p.169 BSIP/UIG/GETTY A man with a spinal-cord injury (right) prepares for a virtual cycle race in which competitors steer avatars using brain signals. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI Artificial intelligence and brain–computer interfaces must respect and preserve people’s privacy, identity, agency and equality, say Rafael Yuste, Sara Goering and colleagues. onsider the following scenario. feels frustrated with the experimental team. illustrates some of the challenges that society A paralysed man participates in a clin- Later, his robotic hand crushes a cup after might be heading towards. ical trial of a brain–computer interface taking it from one of the research assistants, Current BCI technology is mainly focused C(BCI). A computer connected to a chip in his and hurts the assistant. Apologizing for what on therapeutic outcomes, such as helping brain is trained to interpret the neural activ- he says must have been a malfunction of the people with spinal-cord injuries. It already ity resulting from his mental rehearsals of an device, he wonders whether his frustration enables users to perform relatively simple action. The computer generates commands with the team played a part. motor tasks — moving a computer cursor or that move a robotic arm. One day, the man This scenario is hypothetical.
    [Show full text]
  • A Community-Based Transcriptomics Classification and Nomenclature Of
    COMMENT | FOCUS comment | FOCUS A community-based transcriptomics classifcation and nomenclature of neocortical cell types To understand the function of cortical circuits, it is necessary to catalog their cellular diversity. Past attempts to do so using anatomical, physiological or molecular features of cortical cells have not resulted in a unifed taxonomy of neuronal or glial cell types, partly due to limited data. Single-cell transcriptomics is enabling, for the frst time, systematic high-throughput measurements of cortical cells and generation of datasets that hold the promise of being complete, accurate and permanent. Statistical analyses of these data reveal clusters that often correspond to cell types previously defned by morphological or physiological criteria and that appear conserved across cortical areas and species. To capitalize on these new methods, we propose the adoption of a transcriptome-based taxonomy of cell types for mammalian neocortex. This classifcation should be hierarchical and use a standardized nomenclature. It should be based on a probabilistic defnition of a cell type and incorporate data from diferent approaches, developmental stages and species. A community-based classifcation and data aggregation model, such as a knowledge graph, could provide a common foundation for the study of cortical circuits. This community-based classifcation, nomenclature and data aggregation could serve as an example for cell type atlases in other parts of the body. Rafael Yuste, Michael Hawrylycz, Nadia Aalling, Argel Aguilar-Valles, Detlev Arendt, Ruben Armananzas Arnedillo, Giorgio A. Ascoli, Concha Bielza, Vahid Bokharaie, Tobias Borgtoft Bergmann, Irina Bystron, Marco Capogna, Yoonjeung Chang, Ann Clemens, Christiaan P. J. de Kock, Javier DeFelipe, Sandra Esmeralda Dos Santos, Keagan Dunville, Dirk Feldmeyer, Richárd Fiáth, Gordon James Fishell, Angelica Foggetti, Xuefan Gao, Parviz Ghaderi, Natalia A.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Nuevas Neurotecnologías Y Su Impacto En La Ciencia, Medicina Y Sociedad // Rafael Yuste
    Las nuevas neurotecnologías y su impacto en la ciencia, medicina y sociedad // Rafael Yuste Vicerrectorado de Cultura y Proyección Social LECCIONESCAJAL LECCIONESCAJAL // 1 Las nuevas neurotecnologías y su impacto en la ciencia, medicina y sociedad // Rafael Yuste Vicerectorado de Cultura y Proyección Social Universidad de Zaragoza LECCIONESCAJAL // 1 19 de diciembre de 2019 La Lección Cajal es una conferencia anual dictada en la Universidad de Zaragoza por una figura académica relevante en su campo del saber, impul- sada por el Vicerrectorado de Cultura y Proyección Social para conmemorar el 150 aniversario de la entrada de Santiago Ramón y Cajal en esta universi- dad, su «venerada alma mater». UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA Rector Magnífico José Antonio Mayoral Murillo Vicerrectora de Cultura y Proyección Social Yolanda Polo Redondo © Rafael Yuste Edita: Vicerrectorado de Cultura y Proyección Social Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza Diseño: Fernando Lasheras / M.A. Pérez Arteaga Compuesto con la tipografía «Carmen» de Andreu Balius Imprime: Servicio de Publicaciones. Universidad de Zaragoza Depósito legal: z 2137-2019 ISBN 978-84-1340-038-9 RAFael YusTE (Madrid, 1963) estudió Medicina en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid y en la Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Trabajó con Sydney Brenner en Cambridge (Reino Unido) y realizó su doctorado con Larry Katz y Torsten Wiesel en la Rockefeller University de Nueva York. Se especializó en Biofísica en los Laboratorios Bell con David Tank y Winfried Denk. Desde 1996 es miembro del Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas de la Columbia University (Nueva York) donde dirige, desde 2014, el Centro de Neurotecnología. Sus investigaciones buscan desentrañar el funcionamiento la cor- teza cerebral y los daños que se producen en enfermedades como la epilepsia o el Alzheimer, con el fin de buscar una cura para estas.
    [Show full text]
  • Dmitriy Aronov, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae
    Dmitriy Aronov, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae Columbia University (212) 853-1096 Jerome L. Greene Science Center [email protected] 3227 Broadway, Room L4-031 www.aronovlab.com New York, NY 10027 Education Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 2005 – 2010 McGovern Institute for Brain Research Ph.D. in Systems Neuroscience and Computational Methods Columbia University, New York, NY 2001 – 2005 The Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science B.S. in Applied Mathematics Employment Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 2017 – present Assistant Professor of Neuroscience Department of Neuroscience Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 2010 – 2016 Postdoctoral Research Fellow Princeton Neuroscience Institute Laboratory of David W. Tank Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 2005 – 2010 Graduate Student McGovern Institute for Brain Research Laboratory of Michale S. Fee Columbia University, New York, NY 2001 – 2005 Undergraduate Research Assistant Department of Biological Sciences Laboratory of Rafael Yuste Mediterranean Institute of Neurobiology, Marseilles, France 2004, 2005 Visiting Researcher Research group of Rosa Cossart Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 1999 – 2001 Research Student Department of Neurology Laboratory of Jonathan D. Victor Publications [1] Danish, H., Aronov. D., and Fee, M.S. (2017) Rhythmic syllable-related activity in a songbird motor thalamic nucleus necessary for learned vocalizations. PLoS One 12(6): e0169568. [2] Aronov. D., Nevers, R., and Tank, D.W. (2017) Mapping of a non-spatial dimension by the hippocampal/entorhinal circuit. Nature 543(7647): 719-722. [3] Aronov. D. and Tank, D.W. (2014) Engagement of the neural circuits underlying 2D spatial navigation in a rodent virtual reality system.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Hirase CV (August 2019) Name: Hajime Hirase, Ph.D. Date of Birth: 21 December 1972 Place of Birth: Hiroshima, Japan Nationality: Japan Contact information: Hajime Hirase, Ph.D. <[email protected]> Center for Translational Neuromedicine Univerersity of Copenhagen Bregdamsvej 3B (section 24.3) 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark Current position: Main appointment: Professor, Center for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Copenhagen Other appointment: Team Leader, RIKEN Center for Brain Science (CBS) (until March 2020) Education: 1993-1996: Ph.D., Neuroscience, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, (University of London, UK) (Ph.D. awarded in April 1997) 1990-1993: B.Sc. (1st Class Honours), Computer Science, University College London (University of London, UK) Work experience: 2019-present Professor, Center for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Copenhagen. 2018-2020 Team Leader, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Japan 2011-2018 Team Leader, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Japan 2009-2019 Affiliate Associate Professor, Brain and Body System Science Institute, Saitama University 2004-2011 Unit Leader, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Japan 2001-2004 Research Assistant Professor, Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 2000-2001 Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY (Mentor: Rafael Yuste) 1996-2002 Postdoctoral Fellow, Center of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ (Mentor: György
    [Show full text]