DOCSLIB.ORG

Pp53-55 6.3-Anderson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pp53-55 6.3-Anderson THE FINANCIAL SERVICES FORUM Analysis ALL CHANGE AT NUMBER10 Now Gordon Brown is Prime Minister, and Alistair Darling is the new Chancellor, what changes in policy and emphasis can the financial services industry expect from the new team? Westminster watcher Iain Anderson makes a considered assessment of future policy changes. It seems like a very long time we have been waiting for Brown, as the new Economic Secretary with Gordo. But the arrival of the new Prime Minister and his responsibility for financial services. Ussher, for me, is Cabinet is already proving interesting for Westminster one to watch as she bears a striking political watchers like me. resemblance to her predecessor in the role from 2001 There is certainly a new tone to government and – to 2004 Ruth Kelly – and she ended up in the Cabinet. inevitably – a quicker pace towards proceedings. In the One of Darlings’ first tasks will be to ratify the dying days of any administration, both the political class appointment of the new chief executive of the Financial and Whitehall apparatchiks tend to start to go into Services Authority. This will be a key test for continuity or purdah and prepare for a new administration. change. Brown has already announced one change – in Of course this time round, without a General Election or even a contested election for the leadership of the Labour Party, the Whitehall and Westminster The series of announcements on Brown’s community has been able to plan ahead for the new Premier and his team. Cabinet brought some expected changes, The series of announcements on Brown’s Cabinet notably Alistair Darling’s appointment as brought some expected changes, notably Alistair Darling’s appointment as Chancellor. And at the Treasury Chancellor – and at the Treasury there will there will clearly be a very different tone – a department now with a close relationship with Number 10, but having clearly be that very different tone – a little in terms of autonomy. department now with a close relationship Alistair Darling, recently said: “You may get a lot of stick for being dull and boring, but stick to it, make the changes with Number 10 – but having little in that people want, let the improvements speak for terms of autonomy. themselves.” This wise and workmanlike approach will serve him well at the Treasury. It’s unlikely there will be much room there for flashes of inspiration anyway, given the tight spending limits he has inherited from Brown. Further Treasury appointments include Angela Eagle – future years the new FSA chairman and the new chief the combative former member of the Treasury Select executive as well as appointments to the Bank of Committee as Exchequer Secretary, and Kitty Ussher, a England Monetary Policy Committee will be subject to Blairite who has rapidly received preferment under US style Congressional hearings by the Treasury Select www.thefsforum.co.uk Argent Volume 6 Issue 3 53 ARGENT The Government stance on the RDR in particular will be key test of Treasury opinion early under Darling’s tenure at No11 – and will of course have significant implications for the retail market. Committee to ratify these appointments. This is bound On the European policy front – there is growing to impact directly the nature of the appointments and disquiet in both Brussels and Whitehall about MiFID, set therefore the direction of regulatory policy. It is also a to be implemented from November this year. So far further move to make the Treasury Select Committee only three states, the UK, Ireland and Romania, have even more ‘all powerful’. fully transposed the legislation. As the regulator continues to consult on the all In late June, EU Internal Market Commissioner Charlie important Retail Distribution Review as well as the ICOB McCreevy announced the Commission had written to Review it is likely that Government will want to get firmly the remaining 24 EU states to insist that they comply. It involved in the consultation process over the autumn. is somewhat worrying to see big names like France, The Government stance on the RDR in particular will be Germany, Spain and Italy still in this situation. key test of Treasury opinion early under Darling’s tenure I believe the UK Treasury is likely to have MiFID at No11 – and will of course have significant implications implementation high on its agenda into the autumn to for the retail market. ensure the EU Commission will take infringement action. We may even be starting to look at serious slippage in the final implementation timescale – a nuclear option This is a reflection of the importance of the which I don’t think any UK fund business now wants to go down given levels of investment already into making skills agenda to Brown. He is convinced, MiFID happen in the UK. and rightly so, that increased skill levels will Finally at the Treasury, the review into the use of debt as equity, which has set the private equity debate alight, be central to Britain’s future competitiveness is set to report at the time of the Pre-Budget announcement in late November/December. This has and economic success. been a classic case of political campaigning leading towards a formal review. While Gordon Brown has made one of private equity’s chief critics Angela Eagle a The review of mortgage regulation – MCOB, which is Treasury minister, it seems the new Chancellor is set to get underway in 2008 – will also be an area where unlikely to want to do anything which drives a dynamic Westminster, Whitehall and the FSA will intertwine private equity industry out of the UK. heavily. There is much disquiet among policymakers in Away from the Treasury there have also been key an upward interest rate environment. MPs see more promotions for Brownite lieutenants Ed Balls and Yvette cases of hardship in these periods in their constituency Cooper – the Government’s dynamic married duo. surgeries. The whole subject of responsible lending will Cooper takes a seat at Cabinet as the minister in charge be very much driven in coming months. of Housing – demonstrating a key Brownite priority. The Thoresen Review on generic advice is of course Watch out for new thinking on eco homes/mortgages being led from the Treasury which is now trumpeting a and, perhaps, a chance to unlock the equity release public/private partnership approach towards the design market to allow it to become more mainstream. and build of a new advice network. The design of the There have been changes to the machinery of generic advice model is clearly being driven by the government as well as changes in personnel. The Government’s desire to have a national scheme in place Department for Education and Skills has been for the launch of personal accounts in 2012. disbanded with the creation of two new Departments – 54 Volume 6 Issue 3 Argent www.thefsforum.co.uk THE FINANCIAL SERVICES FORUM Labour MPs are likely to look for an early commitment on the promised re-indexing of pensions to earnings – a commitment which may come under scrutiny in terms of its future fundability. one focused on children, young people and pre-19 responsibility for the setting up of the scheme should education (under Ed Balls) and the other on universities, have passed from Parliament to the planned Personal skills and innovation (under John Denham, who returns Accounts Delivery Authority. A new regulatory oversight to government after resigning over the Iraq war in dynamic will emerge between DWP officials and 2003). This is a reflection of the importance of the skills ministers and the Authority. Many will hope this agenda to Brown. He is convinced, and rightly so, that relationship runs smoothly. Of course, others will not! increased skill levels will be central to Britain’s future But that is the stuff of lobbying. competitiveness and economic success. Having been one of the two key figures who have For financial services – and in particular the Financial dominated and reshaped British politics over the past Services Skills Council, which is looking to build on the decade, Brown is now striking out on his own and is approach of the Leitch Report – the coming months are determined to leave his mark on British politics. The important time to ensure that with the new Department face of the Government has been changed. The structure everything remains ‘joined up’. implications for policy are as yet unclear, but it will be Brown has made some bold decisions: the fascinating to watch these developments unfold over appointment of the relatively youthful David Miliband to coming months. the Foreign Office and Jacqui Smith’s big promotion to the Home Office. After a strong track record in Iain Anderson, Director and Chief Corporate Counsel, government and having narrowly missed out on winning Cicero Consulting the Labour Deputy Leadership election, Alan Johnson moves from Education to Health, a key post as this field will form a vital political battleground in the run-up to the Also available online ... next election. Labour has lost its historic poll lead over Visit www.thefsforum.co.uk/knowledge the Tories in health, despite high levels of investment for the following articles: and reduced waiting lists, and will need to quickly and decisively win back the initiative. Personal view All is not well in the world of regulation. Vincent Cable calls Peter Hain has a solid ministerial record, but his the FSA to account – and proposes two initiatives to restore appointment to the Department for Work and Pensions, investor confidence. where he replaces John Hutton (who moves to the new Department for Business and Enterprise) will come as a Sandler and Pickering – our members’ response There is no doubt that the Sandler and Pickering Reports will surprise to many.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download (2399Kb)
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 84893 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Culture is a Weapon: Popular Music, Protest and Opposition to Apartheid in Britain David Toulson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History University of Warwick Department of History January 2016 Table of Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………...iv Declaration………………………………………………………………………….v Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….vi Introduction………………………………………………………………………..1 ‘A rock concert with a cause’……………………………………………………….1 Come Together……………………………………………………………………...7 Methodology………………………………………………………………………13 Research Questions and Structure…………………………………………………22 1)“Culture is a weapon that we can use against the apartheid regime”……...25 The Cultural Boycott and the Anti-Apartheid Movement…………………………25 ‘The Times They Are A Changing’………………………………………………..34 ‘Culture is a weapon of struggle’………………………………………………….47 Rock Against Racism……………………………………………………………...54 ‘We need less airy fairy freedom music and more action.’………………………..72 2) ‘The Myth
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 4258, 19 June 2015 By Cheryl Pilbeam The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Historical background 3. The Wilson doctrine 4. Prison surveillance 5. Damian Green 6. The NSA files and metadata 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 4258, 19 June 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical background 4 3. The Wilson doctrine 5 3.1 Criticism of the Wilson doctrine 6 4. Prison surveillance 9 4.1 Alleged events at Woodhill prison 9 4.2 Recording of prisoner’s telephone calls – 2006-2012 10 5. Damian Green 12 6. The NSA files and metadata 13 6.1 Prism 13 6.2 Tempora and metadata 14 Legal challenges 14 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 15 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped 3 The Wilson Doctrine Summary The convention that MPs’ communications should not be intercepted by police or security services is known as the ‘Wilson Doctrine’. It is named after the former Prime Minister Harold Wilson who established the rule in 1966. According to the Times on 18 November 1966, some MPs were concerned that the security services were tapping their telephones. In November 1966, in response to a number of parliamentary questions, Harold Wilson made a statement in the House of Commons saying that MPs phones would not be tapped. More recently, successive Interception of Communications Commissioners have recommended that the forty year convention which has banned the interception of MPs’ communications should be lifted, on the grounds that legislation governing interception has been introduced since 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • If I Were Chancellor
    If I were Chancellor... Avinash Persaud, Saker Nusseibeh, Tom Brown, Robert Rhodes QC, Stephen Beer, Stephen Hockman QC, Philip Ross, Will Pomroy, Fatima Hassan, Todd Foreman, Alan MacDougall, Allen Simpson, Eleanor Blagbrough, Will Martindale, Robert Allen, Faz Hakim and Eddie Heaton, Tom Sleigh, Emily Benn, James Shafe, David White and Jack Edwards. A collection of essays from Labour in the City 2 WELCOME FROM CICERO Cicero is delighted to support Labour in the City in the publication of its first policy pamphlet. Through our role as a leading public affairs consultancy, representing many of the major British and global financial institutions in the City of London, we recognise the importance of creating a deeper dialogue between those working in the financial sector and those working in the policymaking community. This publication marks a significant contribution to that dialogue. Against the backdrop of the banking crisis, and the era of austerity which has been ushered in since 2008, there is understandable public and policymaker concern at the role of financial markets, and their ability to address Britain’s long standing ills, many of which are addressed in this publication. Notably, this concern focuses on the need to encourage greater long-term investment, boost access to both debt and equity finance for businesses and households, and address the regional and sectoral imbalances within our economy. Britain cannot afford to rely too heavily on London and its financial district. While this debate has justifiably led some to call for a more responsible and ‘socially useful’ financial sector, we must recognise the undeniable benefits the financial sector already creates for the UK, adding nearly £200bn in Gross Added Value to the UK economy in 2011, supporting over 2 million British jobs directly and indirectly, and providing an annual trade surplus of £47bn.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutt Dismissal in Britain Highlights Diverging Drug Views
    NEWS Testy debate: Looking ahead: 2009 in review: Biomarkers for Warwick Anderson We take a look prostate cancer discusses funding back at the past stir controversy in Australia year’s headlines 1339 1346 1348 Nutt dismissal in Britain highlights diverging drug views At a time when the US government has Jacqui Smith over a paper Nutt published in signaled a softer stance on medical marijuana, January on perceptions of risk that compared the dismissal of an independent drug advisor 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in Britain has highlighted the UK’s hard-line (MDMA, or ‘ecstasy’) use to horse riding (J. stance on illegal substances. Psychopharmacol. 23, 3–5; 2009). David Nutt, until recently chair of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Public dispute (ACMD), was fired by UK Home Secretary In a statement, Johnson claimed that Nutt’s Alan Johnson on 30 October. The sacking comments “damage efforts to give the public followed the issuing of a press release relating clear messages about the dangers of drugs.” to a lecture on drug risk and classification that Nutt, however, has hit back in a series of Nutt gave in July at King’s College London. interviews attacking the Labour government’s In his lecture, Nutt criticized the lack of approach to the issue of drugs. evidence for the current classification of drugs As Nature Medicine went to press, no less in the UK and claimed that this undermined than five members of the ACMD had resigned the credibility of the official message on drugs. in protest of Nutt’s dismissal.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • The Child Trust Fund in the UK Policy Challenges and Potential Responses
    The Child Trust Fund in the UK Policy Challenges and Potential Responses Rajiv Prabhakar London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 2009 CSD Working Papers No. 09-56 Campus Box 1196 One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-9906 (314) 935.7433 csd.wustl.edu T HE C HILD T RUST F UND IN THE UK The Child Trust Fund in the UK: Policy Challenges and Potential Responses The United Kingdom introduced the Child Trust Fund (CTF) policy, a children’s savings policy, in 2002. A focus group study conducted on parental attitudes to the CTF (Prabhakar, 2006, 2007) identified main reasons why CTF accounts were left unopened. This paper explores different ways that non-opening of accounts might be reduced. One strategy draws upon recent developments in behavioral economics and points to different ways that the CTF may be designed. An alternative strategy emphasises the role of financial education of parents as a way of addressing their concerns and increasing the opening rates of these accounts. The paper also considers another issue raised during the focus groups, namely parental unhappiness with the treatment of older siblings denied a CTF. This is part of a broader concern about the additional help that may be needed for children from particular backgrounds. Key words: Child Trust Fund; Child Development Fund; children’s savings; financial education; behavioral economics; focus group study; social policy Introduction The Labour government in the UK has recently introduced the Child Trust Fund (CTF) policy. All babies born from September 2002 receive either a £250 or £500 endowment from government, with children from low-income families qualifying for the higher endowment.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform
    UCL DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UniversityThe Constitution College London Unit 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU phone: 020 7679 4977 fax: 020 7679 4978 The Conservative email: [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit A genda for Constitutional The Constitution Unit at UCL is the UK’s foremost independent research body on constitutional change. It is part of the UCL School of Public Policy. THE CONSERVATIVE Robert Hazell founded the Constitution Unit in 1995 to do detailed research and planning on constitutional reform in the UK. The Unit has done work on every aspect AGENDA of the UK’s constitutional reform programme: devolution in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions, reform of the House of Lords, electoral reform, R parliamentary reform, the new Supreme Court, the conduct of referendums, freedom eform Prof FOR CONSTITUTIONAL of information, the Human Rights Act. The Unit is the only body in the UK to cover the whole of the constitutional reform agenda. REFORM The Unit conducts academic research on current or future policy issues, often in collaboration with other universities and partners from overseas. We organise regular R programmes of seminars and conferences. We do consultancy work for government obert and other public bodies. We act as special advisers to government departments and H parliamentary committees. We work closely with government, parliament and the azell judiciary. All our work has a sharply practical focus, is concise and clearly written, timely and relevant to policy makers and practitioners. The Unit has always been multi disciplinary, with academic researchers drawn mainly from politics and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker to Balls: Do Politicians Really Make a Difference?
    Caroline Benn Memorial Lecture 2010 Baker to Balls: Do Politicians really make a difference? Lecturer: Barry Sheerman INTRODUCTION This afternoon I want to engage with you in a way that is appropriate at an event where we remember our friend and comrade Caroline Benn. Caroline was a formidable woman who loved to engage in the cut and thrust of debate. Caroline Benn is probably most famous for her passionate campaign for a fully comprehensive education system in Britain but I remember her as much more than that. When she worked with me when I was a young shadow minister it was obvious that she thrived on the lively exchange of ideas and it was her passion for fairness founded on social justice and education as the foundation stone for a fair society that shone through. She didn’t campaign for comprehensives as a panacea. It is Caroline’s passion for debate, the conviction she held that education was the key to social justice and indeed the fond memories I have of her that I reflected on as I prepared my talk for today. In view of this I hope that my contribution will lead to a vigorous exchange, that takes the longer view of the education debate in this country. I am sure that were Caroline here she would have much to say in response to what I put forward today. It is a great sadness that she is not. But I hope that it might inform the development of future policy as education enters a very different and challenging phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor John Denham (EDE 26)
    Written evidence from Professor John Denham (EDE 26) Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee The Evolution of Devolution: English Devolution I am the Director of the Centre for English Identity and Politics at the University of Southampton. I was MP for Southampton Itchen from 1992-2015 and the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government from 2009-2010. (In that capacity I approved the formation of the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, the first of combined authority). My published work includes a study of Labour’s approach to the governance of England (in Governing England, British Academy, 2018). I am also a Founder and Director of the Southern Policy Centre. The focus of the Centre for English Identity and Politics is on the relationship between national identity and political choices, and on the governance of England and the union. In the past twenty years English, British and combined identities have taken on a political salience with, for example ‘English not British’ voters voting heavily Leave and ‘British not English’ voters tending to vote Remain. National identity is also a good predictor of attitudes towards English governance and the union. The Southern Policy Centre is an independent think tank for central southern England. The SPC has delivered research, reports and events on devolution and regional policy since 2014 and has argued that any local devolution proposals should reflect a coherent regional strategy. 1. England’s national governance Discussion of devolution within England must start with the unsatisfactory nature of England’s national governance. A key reason why English devolution has been challenging is that the national government and state from which powers might be devolved is ill-defined and lacks coherence.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing of Foreign Secretary Jack Straw Before the House of Commons on the Forthcoming IGC (10 September 2003)
    Hearing of Foreign Secretary Jack Straw before the House of Commons on the forthcoming IGC (10 September 2003) Caption: On 10 September 2003, Jack Straw answers the questions of the House of Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny. The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs is heard on the subject of preparations for the IGC, the specific issues involved in the negotiations and the United Kingdom’s room for manoeuvre. Source: Select Committee on European Scrutiny, House of Commons, Examination of Witnesses – Rt Hon Jack Straw, Mr Kim Darroch and Mr Tom Drew, Minutes of Evidence, Questions 1-74, 10.09.03, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmeuleg/1078/3091001.htm. Copyright: House of Lords - UK Parliament URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/hearing_of_foreign_secretary_jack_straw_before_the_house_of_commons_on_the_forthcoming _igc_10_september_2003-en-57a097fd-cd5d-431d-840a-0002187e45e5.html Publication date: 19/12/2013 1 / 17 19/12/2013 House of Commons – Select Committee on European Scrutiny, Minutes of evidence, Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1- 74) Wednesday 10 September 2003 – Rt Hon Jack Straw, Mr Kim Darroch and Mr Tom Drew Q1 Chairman: Foreign Secretary, welcome to the European Scrutiny Committee. I understand that you were thinking this was your first appearance in front of our Committee and, indeed, it is. It is the first time we have had the Foreign Secretary in front of our Committee. I am sure we are both looking forward to it. This particular meeting is to discuss the very important issue of the pending IGC on the Convention proposals. Could I kick off by asking the question, how much room for manoeuvre will there be at the IGC to make changes in the draft Treaty, given the pressure from many quarters to keep the text largely as it is? Mr Straw: I think there will be significant potential for manoeuvre.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing Terrorism Through Preemption: a Comparative Analysis of Radicalization in Three Western Liberal Democracies Derek M.D
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2017 Governing Terrorism through Preemption: A Comparative Analysis of Radicalization in Three Western Liberal Democracies Derek M.D. Silva University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Silva, D. M.(2017). Governing Terrorism through Preemption: A Comparative Analysis of Radicalization in Three Western Liberal Democracies. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4278 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GOVERNING TERRORISM THROUGH PREEMPTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RADICALIZATION IN THREE WESTERN LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES by Derek M.D. Silva Bachelor of Arts University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2012 Master of Arts Carleton University, 2014 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2017 Accepted by: Mathieu Deflem, Major Professor Andrea K. Henderson, Committee Member Carla A. Pfeffer, Committee Member Wadie E. Said, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Derek M.D. Silva, 2017 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION For Ali, Gilmour, and Gator. Gilmour, you were my best friend and true companion. I will never, ever forget the memories we shared as a family. You will live on in my heart forever. Rest in peace my boy. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, whose now infamous proclamation against “committing sociology” when considering issues of terrorism was in many ways the impetus for this project and my entire graduate research career.
    [Show full text]