DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix - a Initial Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix - a Initial Study Appendix - A Initial Study Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Project Revised Final EIR This Page Intentionally Left Blank. INITIAL STUDY City of Fountain Valley ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Planning and Building Project Fountain Valley, CA Department Location: 10200 Slater Avenue Page 1 of 62 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency Name and Address City of Fountain Valley Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact Person Matt Mogensen Director Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Phone No. (714) 593-4426 Project Location The Plan Area is bisected by Interstate 405 (I- 405) and bounded by Talbert Avenue to the north, Ellis Avenue to the south, Ward Street to the west, and the Santa Ana River to the east, in the City of Fountain Valley, California. Project Sponsor’s Name Planning and Building Department City of Fountain Valley Address 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Zoning M1 - Manufacturing General Plan Commercial Manufacturing Other Public Agencies whose approval is N/A required Prepared by: DRAFT 104 West Anapamu Street, Suite 204A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 DRAFT SUBMITTED TO FTS - OCTOBER 16, 2015 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency City of Fountain Valley, CA Page 2 of 62 This Page Intentionally Left Blank DRAFT City of Fountain Valley, Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency City of Fountain Valley, CA Page 3 of 62 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 5 Project Setting and Vicinity Uses ............................................................................................... 6 Project Background .................................................................................................................... 7 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................10 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: ..............................................................................12 Determination: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) .............................................................13 I. Aesthetics ...........................................................................................................................14 II. Agricultural and Forestry Resources ..................................................................................16 III. Air Quality .........................................................................................................................18 IV. Biological Resources ........................................................................................................24 V. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................27 VI. Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................29 VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................32 VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................33 IX. Hydrology and Water Quality............................................................................................37 X. Land Use and Planning .....................................................................................................42 XI. Mineral Resources ...........................................................................................................44 XII. Noise ...............................................................................................................................44 XIII. Population and Housing .................................................................................................47 XIV. Public Services ..............................................................................................................48 XV. Recreation ......................................................................................................................50 XVI. Transportation/Traffic .....................................................................................................51 XVII. Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................55 XVIII. Mandatory Findings of Significance .............................................................................59 List of Resources ......................................................................................................................61 DRAFT City of Fountain Valley, Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency City of Fountain Valley, CA Page 4 of 62 This Page Intentionally Left Blank DRAFT City of Fountain Valley, Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency City of Fountain Valley, CA Page 5 of 62 INTRODUCTION This Initial Study (IS) has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA. It will serve as a preliminary step in the environmental process to assess the potential impacts of the proposed Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan. The primary intent of this document is to assess the potential environmental consequences of the proposed Plan in accordance with the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA. CEQA requires that any proponent of a qualifying project that requires discretionary authority of a governing body must first prepare an environmental assessment to determine the potential environmental impacts of that project before the project can be approved. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan would guide future development within approximately 155 acres of light industrial/commercial uses in the southeastern portion of the City of Fountain Valley. The Specific Plan area is currently occupied by various light industrial (e.g., warehousing), retail, and office land uses and is the City’s former Industrial Redevelopment Project Area. The Specific Plan would include a Land Use Element, Infrastructure Element, and an Implementation, Financing, and Phasing Element to help revitalize this light industrial area while respecting existing, thriving businesses. The Specific Plan would promote reinvestment with a mix of uses including residential, retail, and office land uses and provide facilities and streetscapes that encourage community gathering. As envisioned, enhancement of this area will result in reinvestment to become a core area for civic, commercial, and neighborhood activities for the City. The Specific Plan would guide this future reuse of the existing industrial business park land uses, addressing the type, location, intensity, and design of mixed-use buildings, as well as transportation and public infrastructure improvements. The City intends to work with the community, property and business owners to tailor the Specific Plan to accommodate projected growth in a manner which fosters development of a vibrant and desirable mixed-use area. The components of the Crossings Specific Plan would include the following elements and features: Land Use Element The Land Use Element will include form-based codes to provide greater predictability and flexibility for potential developers, the community, and the City. A form-based code would be drafted to implement the Specific Plan to ensure the vision identified by the community, property and business owners is achieved. Allowable uses, densities, and identification of incompatible uses will also be included. Lastly, the Land Use Element will allow for the vibrant activity center that is desired by the community which will help attract the community to the redeveloped area. Infrastructure Element The Infrastructure Element will include: • A Transportation/Circulation Plan that will identify all transportation improvements inside and outside the Specific Plan Area needed to accommodate new development. DRAFT City of Fountain Valley, Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency City of Fountain Valley, CA Page 6 of 62 • A Roadway Plan that will provide alignments for all interior, neighborhood, collector, and arterial type roads within the Specific Plan Area. • A Pedestrian and Bicycle Network Plan to link new residential uses in the Specific Plan Area to parks, schools, community facilities, and other nearby community amenities. • Transportation/circulation diagrams and maps. • A Streetscape/Landscape Plan that will be integrated with the roadway network and pedestrian/bicycle network plans described above. • A Community
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form
    FHR-8-300 <11-7f) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections _____________ MAR I Ql / 1. Name ________________ S historic and/or common Downtown Orange 2. Location street* number (See contlnuatioA Shoct) not for publication jty' town Orange vicinity of state California code Q6 county QrangA code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public y occupied agriculture museum building(s) private unoccupied x commercial y park structure _ 35. both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific b^ing considered x yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Multiple ownership (List attached^ street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Los Angeles County Recorder Orange County Recorder street & number __________227 North Broadway __ 630 North Broadway city, town 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title ("The Plaza") has this property been determined elegible? £_ yes no date December 1978 federal state county local depository for survey records Keeper of the National Register city,town Washington, B.C. state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __ excellent __ deteriorated __ unaltered _i_ original site _x_good ——ruins —x altered ——moved date __ fair __ unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The Plaza Historic District contains fifty-three buildings of which thirty-five are considered to be historic and contributing to the significance of the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange County Water District Groundwater Replenishment System Final Expansion Project
    Orange County Water District Groundwater Replenishment System Final Expansion Project Addendum No. 6 Final Program Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement & CEQA-PLUS Federal Consultation Review State Clearinghouse Number 98111030 Prepared By Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 August 2016 Orange County Water District Groundwater Replenishment System Final Expansion Project Addendum No. 6 Final Program Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement & CEQA-PLUS Federal Consultation Review State Clearinghouse Number 98111030 Prepared By Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact: Daniel Bott (714) 378-3256 [email protected] In Association With Orange County Sanitation District Environmental Science Associates Pam Daily Associates Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 CEQA Review ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 CEQA-Plus Federal Consultation Review ....................................................... 1-2 1.4 Previous Environmental Documentation ......................................................... 1-3 SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Groundwater Replenishment System Overview
    [Show full text]
  • 720 East Sixth St. HABS No. CA-2851 Santa Ana Orange County California
    720 East Sixth St. HABS No. CA-2851 Santa Ana Orange County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY 720 EAST SIXTH ST. HABS No. CA-2851 Location: 720 East Sixth St. is located in the block bounded by East Sixth St., Lacy St., East Fifth St., and North Porter St. The property is situated within the Fruit Addition tract.1 The property is located at latitude: 3734728.998, longitude: 420286.1564. The coordinate was taken in August 2010, near the front door of the residence at 720 East Sixth St., using a Garmin GPS 60CSx unit with accuracy of +/-5 meters before post processing the data. The coordinate’s datum is North American Datum (NAD) 1983. The location of 720 East Sixth St. has no restriction on its release to the public. Present Owner/ Occupant: City of Santa Ana Present Use: Vacant Significance: The single-family residence at 720 East Sixth St. is architecturally significant as an intact and representative example of a bungalow with Colonial Revival-style influences. Located in the Lacy neighborhood, the property is also historically significant as one of the original residences of the “Fruit Addition” tract, which was associated with increased residential development in the vicinity of the new railways that reached Santa Ana during the late 1800s, providing vital connectivity to the city. Due in part to their proximity to the railroad and the downtown business district, centered at Fourth and Main Streets, buildings in the Fruit Addition tract supported a mix of residential and industrial uses and were some of the earliest developed areas of Santa Ana.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange County Historical Site Plaques
    ORANGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SITE PLAQUES The Orange County Historical Commission (OCHC) has designated sites and structures of local or countywide significance as Historical Sites. Descriptive bronze plaques have been placed at each of these sites by the Orange County Board of Supervisors and OCHC. Each site is listed along with the wording on its plaque. If you have any questions about these sites or would like to nominate a site for the OCHC plaque program, please call the OCHC office at (714) 973-6609 for more information. OC Parks-OCHC- Historic Programs 13042 Old Myford Rd. Irvine, CA 92602 www.ocparks.com PLAQUE CEREMONY #1. SITE OF CARBONDALE October 9, 1976 8002 Silverado Canyon Rd., Silverado, CA 92676 In 1881, after the Southern Pacific took over the Santa Clara Coal Mine northeast of here, a bustling mining camp complete with hotel, saloons, shacks, store, and post office sprang up on these flats. Three years later the mine played out and Carbondale disappeared without a trace. # 2. DOCTOR GEORGE CROOK CLARK HOME AND OFFICE November 3, 1976 Arboretum, California State University, Fullerton, CA Built in 1894 by Fullerton's pioneer physician on the original townsite of Fullerton. An excellent example of the Eastlake Style of Victorian architecture faithfully preserved and maintained as part of California's heritage by hundreds of volunteers. # 3. EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE MESSIAH November 7, 1976 614 N. Bush St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 Santa Ana's oldest assembly on its original site was completed on 1888 and dedicated Easter 1889. Consecrated by Bishop Joseph Johnson October 31, 1887, with Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • FOIA 12‐13607 Submitted to ICE FOIA May 3, 2012
    Student and Exchange Visitor Program U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement FOIA 12‐13607 Submitted to ICE FOIA May 3, 2012 Summary List of SEVP‐Certified Schools located in California, along with flags indicating school education levels School School Local Local Local Local Private Private PrivHighLvl Public Vocation Flight Language Higher Other F M School School Address City State ZIP TrngLvl EduLvl HighLvl Code Name EdLvl ElemLvl MidLvl TechEduLvl TrngLvl LOS214F00078000 The Buckley School 3900 Stansbury Ave Sherman Oaks CA 91423 Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N LOS214F00086000 California Baptist University 8432 Magnolia Avenue Riverside CA 92504 N N N N N N Y Y N Y N LOS214F00091000 California Institute of Technology 1200 E. California Blvd., 250‐86 Pasadena CA 91125 N N N N N N N Y N Y N California Polytechnic State San Luis N N N N N N N Y N Y N LOS214F00093000 University, San Luis Obispo 1 Grand Avenue Obispo CA 93407 LOS214F00097000 Cate School 1960 Cate Mesa Road Carpinteria CA 93013 N N Y N N N N N N Y N LOS214F00101000 CERRITOS COLLEGE 11110 ALONDRA BLVD. NORWALK CA 90650 N N N N N N Y Y N Y N International Student & Scholar N N N N N N N Y N Y N Services, 11139 Anderson St., SSC‐ LOS214F00109000 Loma Linda University (LLU) 1201E Loma Linda CA 92350 LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL N N N Y N N N N N Y N LOS214F00110000 DISTRICT 333 S. Beaudry, 29th floor Los Angeles CA 90017 LOS214F00117000 Linfield Christian School 31950 Pauba Road Temecula CA 92592 Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N LOS214F00147000 Besant Hill School of Happy Valley 8585 Ojai‐Santa Paula Road Ojai CA 93023 N N Y N N N N N N Y N Hebrew Union College‐Jewish N N N N N N N Y N Y N LOS214F00150000 Institute of Religion 3077 University Ave Los Angeles CA 90007 LOS214F00161000 Desert Sands Unified School District 47‐950 Dune Palms Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • II - District Profile Table of Contents
    Section II - District Profile Table of Contents I. OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 3 A. DISTRICT FACTS ............................................................................................ 4 B. DISTRICT SERVICE AREA MAP ........................................................................ 5 C. VISION STATEMENT ........................................................................................ 6 D. MISSION ........................................................................................................ 6 E. GOALS .......................................................................................................... 6 II. HISTORY/GEOGRAPHY OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE DISTRICT ................................. 7 A. ORANGE COUNTY HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY .................................................. 7 B. DISTRICT HISTORY ....................................................................................... 11 TABLE 1: RSCCD PAST DISASTERS ................................................................................................. 11 III. DISTRICT SITE LOCATIONS MAP ............................................................................. 13 TABLE 2: SITES OWNED BY RSCCD ............................................................................................. 15 Rancho Santiago Community College District II. District Profile 2 of 16 Rancho Santiago Community College District II. District Profile I. OVERVIEW The Rancho
    [Show full text]
  • Orange County, California and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 3 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ALISO VIEJO, CITY OF 060770 LAKE FOREST, CITY OF 060759 ANAHEIM, CITY OF 060213 LOS ALAMITOS, CITY OF 060226 BREA, CITY OF 060214 MISSION VIEJO, CITY OF 060735 BUENA PARK, CITY OF 060215 NEWPORT BEACH, CITY OF 060227 COSTA MESA, CITY OF 060216 ORANGE, CITY OF 060228 ORANGE COUNTY CYPRESS, CITY OF 060217 060212 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) DANA POINT, CITY OF 060736 PLACENTIA, CITY OF 060229 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, 060218 060769 CITY OF FULLERTON, CITY OF 060219 SAN CLEMENTE, CITY OF 060230 GARDEN GROVE, CITY OF 060220 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CITY OF 060231 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY OF 065034 SANTA ANA, CITY OF 060232 IRVINE, CITY OF 060222 SEAL BEACH, CITY OF 060233 LA HABRA, CITY OF 060224 STANTON, CITY OF 060234 LA PALMA, CITY OF1 060225 TUSTIN, CITY OF 060235 LAGUNA BEACH, CITY OF 060223 VILLA PARK, CITY OF 060236 LAGUNA HILLS, CITY OF 060760 WESTMINSTER, CITY OF 060237 LAGUNA NIGUEL, CITY OF 060764 YORBA LINDA, CITY OF 060238 LAGUNA WOODS, CITY OF 060768 1No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified REVISED: REVISED PRELIMINARY MARCH 21, 2019 JUNE 20, 2018 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 06059CV001C Version Number 2.3.3.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 13 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN
    [Show full text]
  • OC Feeder Alignment
    Orange County Feeder Relining Project Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Metropolitan Report No. 1428 August 2014 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Orange County Feeder Relining Project For additional information regarding this document, contact: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Environmental Planning Team 700 North Alameda Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Ms. Brenda Marines (213) 217-7902 Ms. Malinda Stalvey (213) 217-5545 Email: [email protected] Metropolitan Water District Of Southern California Report No. 1428 August 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Background and Purpose ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Project Location ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.1 Reach 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 1-14 1.3.2 Reach 2 ....................................................................................................................................... 1-155 1.3.3 Reach
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources (PDF)
    4.3 – CULTURAL RESOURCES 4.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES This section describes the existing cultural resources of the Cypress College campus, identifies associated regulatory requirements, evaluates potential impacts, and identifies mitigation measures related to implementation of the proposed project. The discussion in this section is based on the Cultural Resources Study for the Cypress College Facilities Master Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared by Dudek in September 2016 and the Paleontological Resources Survey Report prepared by Dudek in June 2016. Both reports are included in Appendix C. 4.3.1 Existing Conditions Cultural resources include prehistoric resources and historical-period resources. Prehistoric resources are physical properties resulting from human activities that predate written records and are generally identified as isolated finds or sites. Prehistoric resources can include village sites, temporary camps, lithic (stone tool) scatters, roasting pits/hearths, milling features, rock features, and burials. Historical resources consist of physical properties, structures, or built items resulting from human activities after the time of written records. In North America, the historical period is generally considered to be equivalent to the time period since European contact, beginning in AD 1492. Historical resources can include archaeological remains and architectural structures. Historical archaeological site types include town sites, homesteads, agricultural or ranching features, mining-related features, refuse concentrations, and features or artifacts associated with early military use of the land. Historical architectural resources can include houses, cabins, barns, lighthouses, early military structures, and local structures, such as missions, post offices, and meeting halls. 4.3.1.1 Historical Setting In assessing the historic significance of properties located within the study area, various criteria for designation under federal, state, and local landmark programs were considered and applied.
    [Show full text]
  • B118 Basin Boundary Description 2003
    Hydrologic Region South Coast California’s Groundwater Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, Temescal Subbasin • Groundwater Basin Number: 8-2.09 • County: Riverside • Surface Area: 23,500 acres (37 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology The Temescal Subbasin underlies the southwest part of upper Santa Ana Valley. On the north, the subbasin is bounded by the Chino Subbasin, marked by the Santa Ana River and a set of low hills of crystalline rock near Norco. The eastern part of the subbasin is bounded by nonwater-bearing crystalline rocks of the El Sobrante de San Jacinto and La Sierra Hills. The subbasin is bounded on the west by the Santa Ana Mountains and the south by the Elsinore Groundwater Basin at a constriction in the alluvium of Temescal Wash. Average annual precipitation ranges from 14 to 16 inches per year. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations The water-bearing materials are dominantly composed of Holocene age alluvium deposited by streams draining the northeast slopes of the Santa Ana Mountains. The Santa Ana River has from time to time contributed deposits through the Arlington Gap along the northern margin of the subbasin (DWR 1934). The specific yield varies from about 6 percent along the southwestern and southern margins of the subbasin to about 13 percent beneath the Santa Ana River and more than 14 percent beneath Temescal Wash near Corona (DWR 1934). Restrictive Structures The Elsinore fault zone lies along the western boundary of the subbasin, and the Chino fault zone crosses the northwestern tip of the subbasin.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of the Basin-Fill Aquifers in the Santa Ana Basin, California
    Section 12.—Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of the Basin-Fill Aquifers in the Santa Ana Basin, California By Susan A. Thiros in Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of Selected Basin- Fill Aquifers in the Southwestern United States Edited by Susan A. Thiros, Laura M. Bexfield, David W. Anning, and Jena M. Huntington National Water-Quality Assessment Program Professional Paper 1781 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii Contents Basin Overview .........................................................................................................................................219 Water Development History .....................................................................................................................220 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................221 Conceptual Understanding of the Groundwater Flow System ...........................................................221 Groundwater Quality ................................................................................................................................223 San Jacinto Basin of the Santa Ana Basin ..........................................................................................225 Conceptual Understanding of the Groundwater System in the San Jacinto Basin .............225 Water Budget and Groundwater Flow .................................................................................228 Effects
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan January 2015 This page intentionally left blank. Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1 Regional Planning, Governance, Outreach and Coordination ....................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need for the IRWM Plan ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Regional Governance and Stakeholder Involvement ......................................................... 1-2 1.3.1 Regional Water Management Group.................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.2 Governance Structure .............................................................................................................. 1-5 1.3.3 Stakeholder Identification and Involvement .................................................................. 1-5 1.3.4 Disadvantaged Community Outreach Coordination ................................................... 1-6 1.4 IRWM Plan Update Process ........................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4.1 Progress in Meeting the Objectives
    [Show full text]