DOCSLIB.ORG

Orange County Water District Groundwater Replenishment System Final Expansion Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Orange County Water District Groundwater Replenishment System Final Expansion Project Orange County Water District Groundwater Replenishment System Final Expansion Project Addendum No. 6 Final Program Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement & CEQA-PLUS Federal Consultation Review State Clearinghouse Number 98111030 Prepared By Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 August 2016 Orange County Water District Groundwater Replenishment System Final Expansion Project Addendum No. 6 Final Program Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement & CEQA-PLUS Federal Consultation Review State Clearinghouse Number 98111030 Prepared By Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact: Daniel Bott (714) 378-3256 [email protected] In Association With Orange County Sanitation District Environmental Science Associates Pam Daily Associates Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 CEQA Review ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 CEQA-Plus Federal Consultation Review ....................................................... 1-2 1.4 Previous Environmental Documentation ......................................................... 1-3 SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Groundwater Replenishment System Overview .............................................. 2-1 2.2 Existing Study Area Setting ............................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Proposed Project ............................................................................................. 2-3 2.4 Construction Phasing Plan ............................................................................ 2-11 2.5 Construction Equipment Mix ......................................................................... 2-12 2.4 Approval and Permits .................................................................................... 2-14 SECTION 3.0 CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK LIST .......................................... 3-1 SECTION 4.0 Environmental Analysis .................................................................. 4-1 4.1 AESTHETICS .................................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Project Impacts ....................................................................................... 4-17 4.1.3 Level of Impact ....................................................................................... 4-27 4.2 AGRICULTURE/FOREST RESOURCES ..................................................... 4-28 4.2.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................. 4-28 4.2.2 Project Impacts ....................................................................................... 4-28 4.2.3 Level of Impact ....................................................................................... 4-29 4.3 AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................ 4-30 4.3.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................. 4-30 4.3.2 Project Impacts ....................................................................................... 4-38 4.3.3 Level of Impact ....................................................................................... 4-47 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ......................................................................... 4-48 4.4.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................. 4-48 4.4.2 Project Impacts ....................................................................................... 4-54 4.4.3 Level of Impact ........................................................................................... 4-58 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................... 4-59 4.5.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................ 4-59 4.5.2 Project Impacts .......................................................................................... 4-76 4.5.3 Level of Impact ........................................................................................... 4-83 4.6 GEOLOGY/SOILS ......................................................................................... 4-87 4.6.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................. 4-87 4.6.2 Project Impacts ....................................................................................... 4-88 4.6.3 Level of Impact ....................................................................................... 4-91 4.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ............................................................... 4-92 OCWD GWRS Final Expansion Project – Addendum No. 6 Final EIR/EIS & CEQA-PLUS Federal Consultation Review I 4.7.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................. 4-92 4.7.2 Project Impacts ....................................................................................... 4-97 4.7.3 Level of Impact ..................................................................................... 4-100 4.8 HAZARDS/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ...................................................... 4-101 4.8.1 Environmental Setting........................................................................... 4-101 4.8.2 Project Impacts ..................................................................................... 4-102 4.8.3 Level of Impact ..................................................................................... 4-105 4.9 HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY ............................................................... 4-106 4.9.1 Environmental Setting........................................................................... 4-106 4.9.2 Project Impacts ..................................................................................... 4-112 4.10.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................... 4-123 4.10.2 Project Impacts .................................................................................. 4-124 4.10.3 Level of Impact .................................................................................. 4-127 4.11 MINERAL RESOURCES ......................................................................... 4-129 4.11.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................... 4-129 4.11.2 Project Impacts .................................................................................. 4-129 4.11.3 Level of Impact .................................................................................. 4-130 4.12 NOISE ...................................................................................................... 4-131 4.12.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................... 4-131 4.12.2 Project Impacts .................................................................................. 4-138 4.13 POPULATION/HOUSING ........................................................................ 4-150 4.13.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................... 4-150 4.13.2 Project Impacts .................................................................................. 4-150 4.13.3 Level of Impact .................................................................................. 4-150 4.14 PUBLIC SERVICES ................................................................................. 4-152 4.14.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................... 4-152 4.14.2 Project Impacts .................................................................................. 4-152 4.15 RECREATION ......................................................................................... 4-155 4.15.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................... 4-155 4.15.2 Project Impacts .................................................................................. 4-155 4.15.3 Level of Impact .................................................................................. 4-155 4.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ................................................................ 4-156 4.16.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................... 4-156 4.16.2 Project Impacts .................................................................................. 4-157 4.17 UTILITY SERVICE SYSTEMS ................................................................. 4-161 4.17.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................... 4-161 4.17.2 Project Impacts .................................................................................. 4-162 4.17.3 Level of Impact .................................................................................. 4-164 4.18 MANDANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................ 4-165 OCWD GWRS Final Expansion Project – Addendum No. 6 Final EIR/EIS & CEQA-PLUS Federal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY of BEACH FIRE RULES in CALIFORNIA! There Are Approximately 435 Beaches in the State of California ( Sitelist.Html)
    !SUMMARY of BEACH FIRE RULES in CALIFORNIA! There are approximately 435 beaches in the State of California (http://www.beachcalifornia.com/ sitelist.html). Of these about 38 beaches allow fires (http://www.beachcalifornia.com/beach- !bonfires-california.html) . ! It appears that ONLY Carmel Beach allows unlimited numbers of fires and ONLY Carmel does !not require a designated fire pit! Two major new programs have been implemented to try to further manage this issue, one in the National Park Service at Ocean Beach and one at Newport Beach. They are outlined below. !Following that are the published beach fire rules from the remaining beaches, cities or counties. ! ! NPS PILOT PROJECT Ocean Beach Fire Revised Pilot Program On Friday, May 23 new regulations went into effect for fires on Ocean Beach. This follows a proposal announced on April 21, 2014 to implement a Revised Pilot Program for fires at Ocean Beach. The Revised Pilot includes changes to the existing program in order to address growing concern about the unsafe conditions resulting from these fires, and the unsustainable level of staff effort required to ensure public safety and compliance with regulations. Public feedback was received through May 16, 2014. Information about this Revised Pilot, which includes an impact assessment, response to public comments, amendment to the compendium, and copies of the data collection forms that will be used can be found on this webpage; click Document List on the left, then click on the document title to download. Changes to the Fire Program: - 12 new fire rings installed - Fires must be extinguished at 9:00 PM - Fires prohibited on all Spare the Air Days year-round - Data will be collected on compliance with regulations At the end of the Revised Pilot, once the data collected is evaluated, The National Park Service will determine the next steps for the fire program on Ocean Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix - a Initial Study
    Appendix - A Initial Study Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Project Revised Final EIR This Page Intentionally Left Blank. INITIAL STUDY City of Fountain Valley ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Planning and Building Project Fountain Valley, CA Department Location: 10200 Slater Avenue Page 1 of 62 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency Name and Address City of Fountain Valley Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact Person Matt Mogensen Director Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Phone No. (714) 593-4426 Project Location The Plan Area is bisected by Interstate 405 (I- 405) and bounded by Talbert Avenue to the north, Ellis Avenue to the south, Ward Street to the west, and the Santa Ana River to the east, in the City of Fountain Valley, California. Project Sponsor’s Name Planning and Building Department City of Fountain Valley Address 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Zoning M1 - Manufacturing General Plan Commercial Manufacturing Other Public Agencies whose approval is N/A required Prepared by: DRAFT 104 West Anapamu Street, Suite 204A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 DRAFT SUBMITTED TO FTS - OCTOBER 16, 2015 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency City of Fountain Valley, CA Page 2 of 62 This Page Intentionally Left Blank DRAFT City of Fountain Valley, Planning and Building Department 10200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project Title Fountain Valley Crossings Specific Plan Lead Agency City of Fountain Valley, CA Page 3 of 62 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris: a Pilot Study of Beach Recreation in Orange County, California
    FINAL REPORT Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris: A Pilot Study of Beach Recreation in Orange County, California FINAL | June 15, 2014 prepared for: Marine Debris Division National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration prepared by: Chris Leggett, Nora Scherer, Mark Curry and Ryan Bailey Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 And Timothy Haab Ohio State University Executive Summary Marine debris has many impacts on the ocean, wildlife, and coastal communities. In order to better understand the economic impacts of marine debris on coastal communities, the NOAA Marine Debris Program and Industrial Economics, Inc. designed a study that examines how marine debris influences people’s decisions to go to the beach and what it may cost them. Prior to this study, no work had directly assessed the welfare losses imposed by marine debris on citizens who regularly use beaches for recreation. This study aimed to fill that gap in knowledge. The study showed that marine debris has a considerable economic impact on Orange County, California residents. We found that: ● Residents are concerned about marine debris, and it significantly influences their decisions to go to the beach. They will likely avoid littered beaches and spend additional time and money getting to a cleaner beach or pursuing other activities. ● Avoiding littered beaches costs local residents millions of dollars each year. ● Reducing marine debris on beaches can prevent financial loss and provide economic benefits to residents. Marine debris is preventable, and the benefits associated with preventing it appear to be quite large. For example, the study found that reducing marine debris by 50 percent at beaches in Orange County could generate $67 million in benefits to Orange County residents for a three­month period.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form
    FHR-8-300 <11-7f) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections _____________ MAR I Ql / 1. Name ________________ S historic and/or common Downtown Orange 2. Location street* number (See contlnuatioA Shoct) not for publication jty' town Orange vicinity of state California code Q6 county QrangA code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public y occupied agriculture museum building(s) private unoccupied x commercial y park structure _ 35. both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific b^ing considered x yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Multiple ownership (List attached^ street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Los Angeles County Recorder Orange County Recorder street & number __________227 North Broadway __ 630 North Broadway city, town 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title ("The Plaza") has this property been determined elegible? £_ yes no date December 1978 federal state county local depository for survey records Keeper of the National Register city,town Washington, B.C. state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __ excellent __ deteriorated __ unaltered _i_ original site _x_good ——ruins —x altered ——moved date __ fair __ unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The Plaza Historic District contains fifty-three buildings of which thirty-five are considered to be historic and contributing to the significance of the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    Board of Directors Board Meeting Packet June 2, 2020 SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2020 at 1:00 PM Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, effective March 31, 2020 and May 4, 2020, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at: https://youtu.be/CXk-sT1N2kg Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, June 1, at 3:00pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, June 1 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: https://zoom.us/j/92248099243.
    [Show full text]
  • Huntington Beach 2018 Visitor Profile & Economic Impacts For
    Huntington Beach 2018 Visitor Profile & Economic Impacts For: August 2019 STRATEGIC CONSULTING | MARKET RESEARCH August, 2019 Susan Thomas Vice President - Marketing Visit Huntington Beach Dear Ms. Thomas: Attached is the 2018 Huntington Beach Visitor Profile and Economic & Fiscal Impacts report. The results and our findings represent tourism activity based on 1,500 on-site visitor interviews. The visitor volume and economic and fiscal impacts were estimated by CIC Research, Inc. and Tourism Economics using the base visitor survey data and econometric modeling. If you have questions or seek further interpretation or application of the results, please contact me. It has been our pleasure to work with you, your associates, and the Huntington Beach tourism industry during this most worthwhile engagement. Sincerely, President 600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500 Los Angeles CA 90017 323-407-8577 STRATEGIC CONSULTING | MARKET RESEARCH 2 SECTION 1 Executive Summary of Findings STRATEGIC CONSULTING | MARKET RESEARCH 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - BACKGROUND Overview: Huntington Beach is a popular Southern California coastal resort, and the embodiment of its brand, “Surf City USA.” . Visit Huntington Beach (VHB) is the official entity marketing and managing the destination brand to ensure a satisfying visitor (and community) experience. Study Objectives: Given tourism’s importance to the local economy, VHB commissioned this comprehensive study to measure the size, economic and fiscal contributions of the city’s tourism industry, and to identify visitor characteristics and demographics. • A similar study was conducted in 2011 and corresponding results are compared as shown in parenthesis ( ) after the 2018 results. • The study and final results represent calendar year 2018. • The analysis is based on quarterly intercept interviews among 1,511 visitor groups, an analysis of paid lodging performance and city tax revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Caltrans Inventory of Pacific Electric Routes
    1981 Inventory of PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES I J..,. I ~ " HE 5428 . red by I58 ANGELES - DISTRICT 7 - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH rI P37 c.2 " ' archive 1981 INVENTORY OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES • PREPARED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DISTRICT 07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH FEBRUARY 1982 • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Pacific Electric Railway Company Map 3a Inventory Map 3b II. NQR'I'HIRN AND EASTERN DISTRICTS 4 A. San Bernardino Line 6 B. Monrovia-Glendora Line 14 C. Alhambra-San Gabriel Line 19 D. Pasadena Short Line 21 E. Pasadena Oak Knoll Line 23 F. Sierra Madre Line 25 G. South Pasadena Line 27 H. North Lake Avenue Line 30 10 North Fair Oaks Avenue Line 31 J. East Colorado Street Line 32 K. Pomona-Upland Line 34 L. San Bernardino-Riverside Line 36 M. Riverside-Corona Line 41 III. WESTERN DISTRICT 45 A. Glendale-Burbank Line 47 B. Hollywood Line Segment via Hill Street 52 C. South Hollywood-Sherman Line 55 D. Subway Hollywood Line 58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd. ) -PAGE III. WESTERN DISTRICT (Conta. ) E. San Fernando valley Line 61 F. Hollywood-Venice Line 68 o. Venice Short Line 71 H. Santa Monica via Sawtelle Line 76 I. westgate Line 80 J. Santa Monica Air Line 84 K. Soldier's Home Branch Line 93 L. Redondo Beach-Del Rey Line 96 M. Inglewood Line 102 IV. SOUTHIRN DISTRICT 106 A. Long Beach Line 108 B. American Avenue-North Long Beach Line 116 c. Newport-Balboa Line 118 D. E1 Segundo Line 123 E. San Pedro via Dominguez Line 129 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange County Sanitation District Biosolids Master Plan Project No
    Draft ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BIOSOLIDS MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. PS15-01 Program Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse Number 2017071026 Prepared for February 2018 Orange County Sanitation District Draft ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BIOSOLIDS MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. PS15-01 Program Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse Number 2017071026 Prepared for February 2018 Orange County Sanitation District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Bend Oakland San Francisco Camarillo Orlando Santa Monica Delray Beach Pasadena Sarasota Destin Petaluma Seattle Irvine Portland Sunrise Los Angeles Sacramento Tampa Miami San Diego 150626 OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS OCSD Biosolids Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report Page Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................S-1 Chapter 1: Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
    National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana
    [Show full text]
  • 720 East Sixth St. HABS No. CA-2851 Santa Ana Orange County California
    720 East Sixth St. HABS No. CA-2851 Santa Ana Orange County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY 720 EAST SIXTH ST. HABS No. CA-2851 Location: 720 East Sixth St. is located in the block bounded by East Sixth St., Lacy St., East Fifth St., and North Porter St. The property is situated within the Fruit Addition tract.1 The property is located at latitude: 3734728.998, longitude: 420286.1564. The coordinate was taken in August 2010, near the front door of the residence at 720 East Sixth St., using a Garmin GPS 60CSx unit with accuracy of +/-5 meters before post processing the data. The coordinate’s datum is North American Datum (NAD) 1983. The location of 720 East Sixth St. has no restriction on its release to the public. Present Owner/ Occupant: City of Santa Ana Present Use: Vacant Significance: The single-family residence at 720 East Sixth St. is architecturally significant as an intact and representative example of a bungalow with Colonial Revival-style influences. Located in the Lacy neighborhood, the property is also historically significant as one of the original residences of the “Fruit Addition” tract, which was associated with increased residential development in the vicinity of the new railways that reached Santa Ana during the late 1800s, providing vital connectivity to the city. Due in part to their proximity to the railroad and the downtown business district, centered at Fourth and Main Streets, buildings in the Fruit Addition tract supported a mix of residential and industrial uses and were some of the earliest developed areas of Santa Ana.
    [Show full text]