DOCSLIB.ORG

Geographic Distribution of Epiplateinae Steyskal (Diptera: Richardiidae): New Records and Distribution Maps Istributio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Check List 9(5): 1091–1097, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution N Geographic distribution of Epiplateinae Steyskal (Diptera: Richardiidae): New records and distribution maps ISTRIBUTIO D Lisiane Dilli Wendt * and Rosaly Ale-Rocha RAPHIC G Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade. Avenida André Araújo, 2936, Petrópolis. CEP EO 69011-970, Manaus, AM, Brasil. * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] G N O Abstract: Epiplateinae is a small subfamily of Richardiidae composed by three genera: Automola Loew, Epiplatea Loew OTES and Omomyia Coquillett. Automola and Epiplatea N Neotropical Region. Omomyia has three valid species, which are restricted to arid areas of the southwestern United States. A list of all species of Epiplateinae, their previouslyhave known three distribution and five valid and species, new records respectively; are provided. both are Material widespread examined in the and maps with the geographic distribution of each species are also provided. Richardiidae is a relatively small family, consisting of In this contribution we provide a list of Epiplateinae about 180 species in 33 genera (Hancock 2010), mostly species and their known distribution based on the litera- Neotropical in distribution. A few species have been re- ture, new records and material examined. We also provide corded from the Nearctic Region, and there are no records maps with the geographic distribution of each species. The material examined belongs to the following institutions Currently, Richardiidae is divided into two subfamilies: (curator name within parenthesis): Canadian National Richardiinaeto Chile and Patagonia Snow and (Aczél Epiplateinae 1950; Steyskal Steyskal. 1968). Initially, Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, McAlpine (1976) suggested that Automola Loew, Epiplatea Loew and Omomyia Coquillett belonged to a distinct group Zoológica do Maranhão, Caxias, Maranhão, Brazil – CZMA in Richardiidae. Subsequently, Steyskal (1987) proposed a Ontario, Canada – CNC (Dr. Jeff H. Skevington); Coleção new subfamily, Epiplateinae, to allocate those three genera. Paulo Bührnhein, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Epiplateinae is quite homogeneous morphologically, and Federal(Dr. Francisco do Amazonas, Limeira deManaus, Oliveira); Brazil Coleção – CZPB Zoológica (Dr. Nair Prof. O. a preliminary phylogenetic analysis indicates that the - subfamily is a strongly supported monophyletic group re, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Pa- (Wendt and Ale-Rocha, unpublished data). The three raná,Aguiar); Curitiba, Coleção Paraná, Entomológica Brazil – DZUP Padre (Dr. Jesus Claudio Santiago José MouB. de genera are small: Automola and Omomyia have three - species each, and Epiplatea Automola and Epiplatea are widespread and occur in many regions TheCarvalho); Hunterian Entomological (Zoology Museum), Museum, UniveristyLogan, Utah of State Glasgow, Uni of the Neotropics, but records hasof their five componentspecies. species versity, Utah, United States – EMUS (Dr. Wilford J. Hanson); Coleção de Invertebrados, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Omomyia is daGlasgow, Amazônia, Soctland, Manaus, UK – Amazonas,GLAHM (Dr. Brazil E. Geoffrey – INPA Hancock); (Dr. Au- restrictedare dispersed, to arid scarce areas and in theoutdated southwestern (Hendel portion1911; Hennig of the United1937; SteyskalStates of America,1958). The and distribution the last contribution of on the genus was published by Steyskal (1973). Paraensegusto L. Henriques); Emílio Goeldi, Museu Belém, Nacional Pará, do Brazil Rio de – Janeiro, MPEG (Dr.Rio de Janeiro, Brazil – MNRJ (Dr. Márcia Souto Couri); Museu Table 1. List of species of Epiplateinae Steyskal (Diptera, Richardiidae), followed by previously known distribution and new records. SPECIES PREVIOUSLY KNOWN DISTRIBUTION NEW RECORDS Brazil: RO, AM, ES, SP, SC. Trinidad & Automola atomaria (Wiedemann) Tobago: Trinidad, Ecuador Automola caloptera (Bigot) Costa Rica; Guyana; Mexico; Peru; Bolivia; Paraguay; Brazil: AP, AM, RO. Ecuador Argentina; Brazil: MG, RS. Automola rufa Cresson Mexico: Durango, Puebla Guyanna; Peru; Bolivia; Costa Rica; Brazil: PA, BA. Epiplatea arcuata Hendel Brazil: RR, AM. Bolivia USA: TX, AZ, NM; Mexico: Aguascalientes, Morelos. Epiplatea erosa Loew Cuba, Porto Rico, Dominican Republic. Costa Rica Guyana; Peru; Brazil: PA. Epiplatea hondurana Steyskal Honduras. Costa Rica Epiplatea isthmi Steyskal Panama. Costa Rica Epiplatea recta Hendel Paraguay. Brazil: SC, RS Omomyia hirsuta Coquillett USA: CA, AZ. USA: UT Omomyia melanderi Steyskal USA: CA. USA: NV Omomyia regularis Curran USA: CA, AZ, NM. USA: UT, TX Abbreviatons to states: Brazil - AM: Amazonas; AP: Amapá; BA: Bahia; ES: Espírito Santo; MG: Minas Gerais; RO: Rondônia; RR: Roraima; SC: Santa Catarina; SP: São Paulo. United States of America - AZ: Arizona; CA: California; NM: New Mexico; TX: Texas; UT: Utah. 1091 Wendt and Ale-Rocha | Geographic distribution of Epiplateinae (Diptera: Richardiidae) - tions Dresden, Museum of Zoology (Museum fuer Tierkun- Orlando T. Silveira); Senckenberg Natural History Collec female, EMUS); idem, 7.ii.1991, idem (2 females, EMUS); de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Bra- idem, 12.ii.1991 idem (1, male, EMUS); idem, 26.ii.1991, zilde), – Dresden,MZSP (Dr. Germany Carlos José – MTD E. Lamas). (Dr. Uwe State Kallweit); abbreviations Museu idem (3 females, EMUS); idem, 10-19.iii.1991, idem, (1 male, 1 female, EMUS); idem, 20-26.iii.1991, idem (1 male, EMUS); idem, 22-31.v.1991, idem (1 female, EMUS); idem, as follows: Brazil – AM: Amazonas; AP: Amapá; BA: Bahia; 11-20.iv.1991, idem (1 male, EMUS); idem, 1-11.vi.1991, ES: Espírito Santo; MA: Maranhão; MG: Minas Gerais; RO: idem (1 male, EMUS); idem, 16-17.vi.1991, idemCartago, (1 male, Rondônia; RR: Roraima; SC: Santa Catarina; SP: São Paulo. nearEMUS); Tuis, idem, 16-22.vi.1993, 1-10.x.1991, W.J. idem Hanson (1 male, col. 1 female, EMUS); United States of America – AZ: Arizona; CA: California; NM: Trinidadidem, 11-21.ix. & Tobago 1991,, Trinidad idem (2, Arimamales, Valley, EMUS); 25.viii.1998, AutomolaNew Mexico; Loew TX: (FigureTexas; UT: 1) Utah. (1 male, EMUS); Comments: Species are characterized as follows: Brazil, body 5.0-9.0 mm in length, robust, yellow orange, brown Amazonas,E.G. Hancock Guajará, col. (2 males, Rio Ipixuna, 1 female, 07°06’39” GLAHM); S Hollis 73°05’25” Dam, or dark brown. The species of the genus differ from the W,12 13-19.vi.1995,July 1994, E.G. HancockP.F. Bührnheim col. (1 male,and N.O. GLAHM); Aguiar cols (2 species of Epiplatea and Omomyia in having the wing with conspicuous circular and/or transversal spots and Sudoeste do Rio Urucu =Southwest Urucu River Field], males, 10 females, CZPB); Coari, Rio Urucu SUC-2 [Campo vein R1 robust seta and proepisternum ciliated. Automola has three valid ciliated species. on Automola dorsal surface;atomaria proepimeron (Wiedemann) with and 04°57’58” S 65°19’38” W,14-24.v.1993, P.F. Bührnheim A. caloptera (Bigot) are widespread in the Neotropical et al. cols. (20 males, CZPB); idem, RUC-27 [Campo Rio Automola rufa Cresson has restrict distribution in Urucu=Urucu River Field], 04°49’34” S 65°15’37” W, 05- the southeastern United States of America and Mexico. It 18iii.1994, idem (1 male, CZPB); idem LUC-09 [Campo shouldRegion; be noted that A. automola is sexually dimorphic. We Leste do Rio Urucu=East Urucu River Field], 04°51’56” S illustrate a male (Fig. 1) and the wing pattern of females is Bührnheim,65°0456” W, N.O.25.i-10.ii.1995, Aguiar et al.idem cols. (2 males, CZPB); Juruá, Mineruazinho 03°34’85” S 66°59’15” W, 13-25.i.1996, P.F L.S. Aquino col. (4 males, 5 females, Automolashown by Hancock atomaria (2010; Fig 65.4). Ortalis). CZPB); Rio Negro, Parque Nacional do Jaú, 18-20.vii.1993, Type-locality: “Brazil”. L. Albuquerque(1 col. female, INPA); Manaus, Reserva Ducke, Geographic distribution(Wiedemann), (Figure 1830: 1): Mexico: 461 ( Atoyac, 6.iii.1968, without col. (1 female, INPA); idem, 24.i.1978, (1 male, INPA); idem, 12.iii.1978, idem (1 male, 3 females, INPA); idem, 26.vi.1979, idem (1 Veracruz (Wulp 1899); Costa Rica (Hancock 2010), Atenas female, INPA); idem, 30.xii.1981, J.A. Rafael col. (1 male, (Hendel(Steyskal 1911), 1958); RS Trinidad(Hennig 1937),& Tobago: AM, RO, Trinidad ES, SP and (new SC INPA); idem, 02°55’51” S 59°58’59” W, 6-9.iii.2008, G.P.S. record); Guyana: Kartabo (Curran 1934a); Brazil: MG RioDantas Abacaxis, col. (1 05°15’09” male, INPA); S 58°11’52” Estrada W, Manaus-Boa 26-29.v.2008, Vista, J.A. BR174, km 53, vi.1972, RoppaRondônia, col. (1 male,Ouro PretoMZSP); do Maués, Oeste, (new records); Ecuador (new record); Peru: Meshagua, (SteyskalPichis (Hendel 1958). 1911); Bolivia: Mapiri, Suapi (Hendel xi.1975,Rafael col. Expedição (1 male, INPA);Permanente à Amazônia col. (1 female, 1911);Material Paraguay examined: (Hendel Costa 1911); Rica Argentina:, Guanacaste, Misiones 3 km 30.iii.1985, M.F. Torres col. (1 male, MPEG); Cálama, 19-21. southeast to Naranjo River, 1-15.v.1992, F.D. Parker col. MZSP); 62 km Southeast to Ariquemes, 17-24.iii.1989, W.J. Hanson col. (12 males, 2 females, EMUS); idem, 15- (1 female, EMUS); idem, 11-20.vii.1992, idem (1 male, 1 22.iii.1991, idem (4 males, 1 female, EMUS); idem, 13- female EMUS); idem, 13.vii.1992, idem (1 male, EMUS); 25.iv.1992, idem (8 males, 9 females, EMUS); idem, 8-20. idem, v.1993, idem (1 male, EMUS); idem, 14-20.viii.1993, xi.1994, idem (3 males, EMUS); idem, 5-16.xi.1996, idem idem (1 male, EMUS); 14 km south to Cañas, 3.iii.1990, (12 males, 2 females, EMUS);Espírito idem, Santo 23-31.ix.1997,, Linhares, ix.1972, idem idem (1 female, EMUS); 13.iii.1990, idem Alajuela,(2 females, 20 (6 males, 1 female, EMUS); idem, 1-14.xi.1997,São B.
Recommended publications
  • Avaliao Sonogrfica E Funcional De Rins De Felinos Brasileiros Da Espcie

    Avaliao Sonogrfica E Funcional De Rins De Felinos Brasileiros Da Espcie

    Artrópodes associados às carcaças de pequenos roedores expostas em área de formação vegetal secundária no município de Campinas, SP Thiago de Carvalho Moretti Resumo Embora estudos do destino post-mortem de cadáveres humanos sejam de interesse forense, e na natureza Moretti, Thiago de Carvalho grandes animais se tornem disponíveis à colonização por insetos logo após a morte, o destino do vasto M817a número de carcaças de animais pequenos em alguns habitats, bem como os parâmetros que conduzem este Artrópodes associados às carcaças de pequenos processo, ainda são pouco estudados. Em vista deste roedores expostas em área de formação vegetal quadro, foram conduzidos estudos sobre a secundária no município de Campinas, SP / Thiago de decomposição de carcaças de pequenos roedores em Carvalho Moretti. -- Campinas, SP: [s.n.], 2006. uma área de vegetação secundária dentro do campus da Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP (22o49’15’’S, 47o04’08’’W) na cidade de Campinas – Orientador: Odair Benedito Ribeiro. SP (Brasil), de agosto de 2003 a junho de 2004, para Dissertação (mestrado) – Universidade Estadual de analisar a composição da fauna de invertebrados que Campinas, Instituto de Biologia. visitam e colonizam os cadáveres. Quatro carcaças de camundongo de laboratório (Mus musculus) e quatro carcaças de rato (Rattus norvegicus) foram expostas 1. Entomologia forense. 2. Animais - Carcaças. 3. em cada estação, durante o período acima Diptera. 4. Camundongo. 5. Rattus norvegicus. I. estabelecido. As carcaças foram acondicionadas em Ribeiro,
  • Diptera) Diversity in a Patch of Costa Rican Cloud Forest: Why Inventory Is a Vital Science

    Diptera) Diversity in a Patch of Costa Rican Cloud Forest: Why Inventory Is a Vital Science

    Zootaxa 4402 (1): 053–090 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4402.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C2FAF702-664B-4E21-B4AE-404F85210A12 Remarkable fly (Diptera) diversity in a patch of Costa Rican cloud forest: Why inventory is a vital science ART BORKENT1, BRIAN V. BROWN2, PETER H. ADLER3, DALTON DE SOUZA AMORIM4, KEVIN BARBER5, DANIEL BICKEL6, STEPHANIE BOUCHER7, SCOTT E. BROOKS8, JOHN BURGER9, Z.L. BURINGTON10, RENATO S. CAPELLARI11, DANIEL N.R. COSTA12, JEFFREY M. CUMMING8, GREG CURLER13, CARL W. DICK14, J.H. EPLER15, ERIC FISHER16, STEPHEN D. GAIMARI17, JON GELHAUS18, DAVID A. GRIMALDI19, JOHN HASH20, MARTIN HAUSER17, HEIKKI HIPPA21, SERGIO IBÁÑEZ- BERNAL22, MATHIAS JASCHHOF23, ELENA P. KAMENEVA24, PETER H. KERR17, VALERY KORNEYEV24, CHESLAVO A. KORYTKOWSKI†, GIAR-ANN KUNG2, GUNNAR MIKALSEN KVIFTE25, OWEN LONSDALE26, STEPHEN A. MARSHALL27, WAYNE N. MATHIS28, VERNER MICHELSEN29, STEFAN NAGLIS30, ALLEN L. NORRBOM31, STEVEN PAIERO27, THOMAS PAPE32, ALESSANDRE PEREIRA- COLAVITE33, MARC POLLET34, SABRINA ROCHEFORT7, ALESSANDRA RUNG17, JUSTIN B. RUNYON35, JADE SAVAGE36, VERA C. SILVA37, BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR38, JEFFREY H. SKEVINGTON8, JOHN O. STIREMAN III10, JOHN SWANN39, PEKKA VILKAMAA40, TERRY WHEELER††, TERRY WHITWORTH41, MARIA WONG2, D. MONTY WOOD8, NORMAN WOODLEY42, TIFFANY YAU27, THOMAS J. ZAVORTINK43 & MANUEL A. ZUMBADO44 †—deceased. Formerly with the Universidad de Panama ††—deceased. Formerly at McGill University, Canada 1. Research Associate, Royal British Columbia Museum and the American Museum of Natural History, 691-8th Ave. SE, Salmon Arm, BC, V1E 2C2, Canada. Email: [email protected] 2.
  • Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii

    Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii

    Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3].
  • Redalyc.Contribution to a History of Mexican Dipterology Part II.- The

    Redalyc.Contribution to a History of Mexican Dipterology Part II.- The

    Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie) ISSN: 0065-1737 [email protected] Instituto de Ecología, A.C. México Papavero, Nelson; Ibáñez Bernal, Sergio Contribution to a History of Mexican Dipterology Part II.- The Biologia Centrali-Americana Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie), núm. 88, 2003, pp. 143 - 232 Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Xalapa, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57508806 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Acta Zool. Mex. (n.s.) 88:143-232 (2003) CONTRIBUTIONS TO A HISTORY OF MEXICAN DIPTEROLOGY. PART II.- THE BIOLOGIA CENTRALI-AMERICANA Nelson PAPAVERO1 & Sergio IBÁÑEZ-BERNAL2 1 Museu de Zoologia & Instituto de Estudos Avançados, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BRAZIL Pesquisador do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Proc. Nº 1 300994/79) 2 Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Departamento de Entomología, km 2.5 carretera antigua a Coatepec N/ 351, Congregación El Haya, 91070, Xalapa, Veracruz, MÉXICO RESUMEN En esta segunda contribución a la historia de la Dipterología mexicana, se presentan datos generales de la obra Biologia-Centrali Americana, de sus autores, colectores y de los viajes efectuados para la obtención del material. Específicamente con respecto a Diptera, se incluyen algunos aspectos de la vida y obra de los contribuidores de este trabajo. Aquí se enlistan todos los nombres de especies de los Diptera mexicanos propuestos por Karl Robert Romanovitch Baron von den Osten Sacken (78 especies), Samuel Wendell Williston (200 especies), John Merton Aldrich (47 especies), William Morton Wheeler y Axel Leonard Melander (18 especies), y Frederik Maurits Van Der Wulp (610 especies).
  • (Diptera) from Hispaniola

    (Diptera) from Hispaniola

    Zootaxa 1259:25-31 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ 7C\C\r I1 A "Y" \ /f^cS^ Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new genus and species of Richardiidae (Diptera) from Hispaniola DANIEL E. PEREZ-GELABERT1 & E CHRISTIAN THOMPSON2 'Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, NHB-0169, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new genus and species of richardiid flies are described from the Neotropical biotic region (Johnrichardia Perez-Gelabert & Thompson, type species, vockerothi Perez-Gelabert & Thompson (Dominican Republic)). Key words: Taxonomy, Richardiidae, Neotropical Region Introduction The family Richardiidae is a small group of semitropical to tropical flies restricted to the New World. They are related to the true fruit flies (Tephritidae). What is known of their biology indicates that the maggots are plant feeders or saprophages in decaying plant material (Ferrar 1987). One species (Melanoloma viatrix Hendel) has been reported as a pest of pineapple (Peneranda & Ospina 1995, Martinez et alia 2000). Another species (E piplatea hondurana Steyskal) was reported from diseased coconut palm (Steyskal 1958). The family consists of 30 genera and 175 species (Thompson 2004). The last keys to World genera were published by Hendel (1911a, b), although Steyskal (1958, 1987) published keys to the genera found in America north of Mexico. Catalogs have been published by Aczel (1950) and Steyskal (1968).
  • Manual of Nearctic Diptera

    Manual of Nearctic Diptera

    539 The history of dipterology at the Canadian National Collection of Insects, with special reference to the Manual of Nearctic Diptera Jeffrey M. Cumming, Bradley J. Sinclair, Scott E. Brooks, James E. O’Hara, Jeffrey H. Skevington Abstract*The history of Diptera research at the Canadian National Collection of Insects is briefly outlined. Short biographic sketches of the coordinators of the Manual of Nearctic Diptera are given and the development of the Manual project is presented to provide background on their achievements. Lists of publications by each of the coordinators and of patronyms honouring them are provided. This Festschrift honours the remarkable contributions of the coordinators, J. Frank McAlpine, Bobbie V. Peterson, Guy E. Shewell, Herbert J. Teskey, J. Richard Vockeroth, and D. Monty Wood. Re´sume´*On de´crit brie`vement l’histoire de la recherche en dipte`re a` la Collection nationale canadienne d’insectes. On pre´sente de courtes biographies des coordonnateurs du Manuel de dipte`res ne´arctiques, ainsi que le de´veloppement du projet du manuel pour fournir de l’information sur leurs re´alisations. On fourni des listes de re´fe´rences publie´es par chaque coordinateur et des noms patronymiques en leur honneur. Ce nume´ro est en l’honneur des contributions remarquables des coordinateurs J. Frank McAlpine, Bobbie V. Peterson, Guy E. Shewell, Herbert J. Teskey, J. Richard Vockeroth, et D. Monty Wood. Introduction been taken from personal accounts, archived sources housed in the Diptera Unit, and This historical review treats the development publications on the history of systematic of the Diptera collection at the Canadian research in Canada and publications from the National Collection of Insects, Arachnids Research Branch of AAFC, including Gibson and Nematodes (CNC) and the individuals and McSwaine (1920), McDunnough (1926), responsible for its growth and curation.
  • ISSUE 58, April, 2017

    ISSUE 58, April, 2017

    FLY TIMES ISSUE 58, April, 2017 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 262-1131 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the latest issue of Fly Times! As usual, I thank everyone for sending in such interesting articles. I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed putting it together. Please let me encourage all of you to consider contributing articles that may be of interest to the Diptera community for the next issue. Fly Times offers a great forum to report on your research activities and to make requests for taxa being studied, as well as to report interesting observations about flies, to discuss new and improved methods, to advertise opportunities for dipterists, to report on or announce meetings relevant to the community, etc., with all the associated digital images you wish to provide. This is also a great place to report on your interesting (and hopefully fruitful) collecting activities! Really anything fly-related is considered. And of course, thanks very much to Chris Borkent for again assembling the list of Diptera citations since the last Fly Times! The electronic version of the Fly Times continues to be hosted on the North American Dipterists Society website at http://www.nadsdiptera.org/News/FlyTimes/Flyhome.htm. For this issue, I want to again thank all the contributors for sending me such great articles! Feel free to share your opinions or provide ideas on how to improve the newsletter.
  • June, 1997 ORNAMENTS in the DIPTERA

    June, 1997 ORNAMENTS in the DIPTERA

    142 Florida Entomologist 80(2) June, 1997 ORNAMENTS IN THE DIPTERA JOHN SIVINSKI USDA, ARS, Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology Gainesville, FL 32604 ABSTRACT Occasionally, flies bear sexually dimorphic structures (ornaments) that are used, or are presumed to be used, in courtships or in aggressive interactions with sexual ri- vals. These are reviewed, beginning with projections from the head, continuing through elaborations of the legs and finishing with gigantism of the genitalia. Several functions for ornaments are considered, including advertisement of genetic proper- ties, subversion of female mate choice and “runaway” sexual selection. Neither the type of ornament nor the degree of elaboration necessarily indicates which of the above processes is responsible for a particular ornament. Resource distribution and the resulting possibilities for resource defense and mate choice explain the occurrence of ornaments in some species. The phyletic distribution of ornaments may reflect for- aging behaviors and the type of substrates upon which courtships occur. Key Words: sexual selection, territoriality, female mate choice, arms races RESUMEN Ocasionalmente, las moscas presentan estructuras sexuales dimórficas (ornamen- tos) que son utilizados o se cree sean utilizadas en el cortejo sexual o en interacciones agresivas con sus rivales sexuales. Dichas estructuras han sido evaluadas, comen- zando con proyecciones de la cabeza, continuando con las estructuras elaboradas de las extremidades y terminando con el gigantismo de los genitales. Se han considerado distintas funciones para dichos ornamentos, incluyendo la promoción de sus propie- dades genéticas, subversión de la elección de la hembra por aparearse, y el rehusare a la selección sexual. Tanto el tipo de ornamento como el grado de elaboración no ne- cesariamente indicaron cual de los procesos mencionados es el responsable de un or- namento en particular.
  • New Records of Pollinators and Other Insects Associated with Arizona Milkweed, Asclepias Angustifolia, at Four Sites in Southeastern Arizona

    New Records of Pollinators and Other Insects Associated with Arizona Milkweed, Asclepias Angustifolia, at Four Sites in Southeastern Arizona

    Journal of Pollination Ecology, 27(1), 2021, pp 1-24 NEW RECORDS OF POLLINATORS AND OTHER INSECTS ASSOCIATED WITH ARIZONA MILKWEED, ASCLEPIAS ANGUSTIFOLIA, AT FOUR SITES IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA Robert A. Behrstock Naturewide Images, 10359 S Thicket Place, Hereford, AZ 85615 U.S.A. Abstract—Asclepias angustifolia is a Mexican milkweed that barely enters the U.S.A. Its pollinators and other insect visitors have not been investigated. During 2018 and 2019, insect visitors were photographed at a native population and three gardens in and near the Huachuca Mountains, Southeastern Arizona. A total of 216 site visits produced at least 369 species of insects in seven orders. Images revealed 140 potential pollinators with a preponderance of Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera. Orders of insects are discussed, as are flowering phenology, potential pollinators in functional groups, introduced insects, and the value of A. angustifolia for monarch butterflies and other insects in pollinator gardens and in planting palettes created for restoration sites. Keywords: Sky Island, Madrean Pine-Oak Woodland, monarch butterfly, Huachuca Mountains, gardening, restoration INTRODUCTION milkweed, A. linaria Cavanillies, that produces higher concentrations of cardenolide toxins and greater amounts of North American milkweeds (Asclepias spp.) provide defensive latex (Pegram & Melkonoff 2019). Planting nectar to an unusually large diversity of insects, making them milkweeds is becoming a widespread practice aimed at important members of existing ecosystems and valuable increasing north- or southbound cohorts of the monarch’s additions to sites benefiting from a broad spectrum of complicated multi-generational migration; however, some pollinators (Ollerton et al. 2019, Tallamy 2007). For authors (e.g., Inamine et al.
  • 9Th International Congress of Dipterology

    9Th International Congress of Dipterology

    9th International Congress of Dipterology Abstracts Volume 25–30 November 2018 Windhoek Namibia Organising Committee: Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs (Chair) Burgert Muller Mary Kirk-Spriggs Gillian Maggs-Kölling Kenneth Uiseb Seth Eiseb Michael Osae Sunday Ekesi Candice-Lee Lyons Edited by: Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs Burgert Muller 9th International Congress of Dipterology 25–30 November 2018 Windhoek, Namibia Abstract Volume Edited by: Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs & Burgert S. Muller Namibian Ministry of Environment and Tourism Organising Committee Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs (Chair) Burgert Muller Mary Kirk-Spriggs Gillian Maggs-Kölling Kenneth Uiseb Seth Eiseb Michael Osae Sunday Ekesi Candice-Lee Lyons Published by the International Congresses of Dipterology, © 2018. Printed by John Meinert Printers, Windhoek, Namibia. ISBN: 978-1-86847-181-2 Suggested citation: Adams, Z.J. & Pont, A.C. 2018. In celebration of Roger Ward Crosskey (1930–2017) – a life well spent. In: Kirk-Spriggs, A.H. & Muller, B.S., eds, Abstracts volume. 9th International Congress of Dipterology, 25–30 November 2018, Windhoek, Namibia. International Congresses of Dipterology, Windhoek, p. 2. [Abstract]. Front cover image: Tray of micro-pinned flies from the Democratic Republic of Congo (photograph © K. Panne coucke). Cover design: Craig Barlow (previously National Museum, Bloemfontein). Disclaimer: Following recommendations of the various nomenclatorial codes, this volume is not issued for the purposes of the public and scientific record, or for the purposes of taxonomic nomenclature, and as such, is not published in the meaning of the various codes. Thus, any nomenclatural act contained herein (e.g., new combinations, new names, etc.), does not enter biological nomenclature or pre-empt publication in another work.
  • Abstract Wallace, Charles Reid. A

    Abstract Wallace, Charles Reid. A

    ABSTRACT WALLACE, CHARLES REID. A Molecular and Morphological Analysis of Ulidiidae (Diptera: Tephritoidea). (Under the direction of Brian M. Wiegmann). Ulidiidae (Diptera: Tephritoidea) is a relatively small family of true flies, called the “picture-winged flies” for their patterned wings. Its relationship to the other members of Tephritoidea, and its monophyly, has been well established, through both morphological and molecular analysis. Its subfamilial relationships, however, have received limited molecular analysis, having had a significant cross-section of the family’s taxa represented in only two molecular studies (Galinskaya et al. 2014, Han and Ro 2016). The most contemporary treatment of the classification of the family is by Kamenev and Korneyev (2006), according to which the Ulidiidae is divided into two subfamilies (Otitinae, Ulidiinae), each of which is further delineated into tribes (Cephaliini, Myennidini, Otitini; Lipsanini, Pterocallini, Seiopterini, Ulidiini, respectively), with an additional incertae sedis group of genera within the Otitinae. These classifications are based solely on morphological analysis, and there remain multiple outstanding questions of the placement and monophyly regarding the tribes or several large, diverse, or enigmatic genera. Here, using the next-generation sequencing method of anchored hybrid enrichment, I investigate the phylogeny of Ulidiidae with particular attention paid to the constituency and monophyly of hypothesized tribes, monophyly of the two sub-families, and placement of genera. Through maximum likelihood analysis, my results establish strong support for the separation of Ulidiidae into two monophyletic subfamilies, but challenges the assignment of Myennidini to the Ulidiidae, and potentially of Seiopterini to the Ulidiinae. It additionally suggests the paraphyly of the tribe Pterocallini with respect to both Myennidini and Lipsanini, but supports the monophyly of all other tribes.
  • Chapter 9 Biodiversity of Diptera

    Chapter 9 Biodiversity of Diptera

    Chapter 9 Biodiversity of Diptera Gregory W. Courtney1, Thomas Pape2, Jeffrey H. Skevington3, and Bradley J. Sinclair4 1 Department of Entomology, 432 Science II, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK – 2100 Copenhagen Denmark 3 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Canada 4 Entomology – Ontario Plant Laboratories, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Canada Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, 1st edition. Edited by R. Foottit and P. Adler © 2009 Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 978-1-4051-5142-9 185 he Diptera, commonly called true flies or other organic materials that are liquified or can be two-winged flies, are a familiar group of dissolved or suspended in saliva or regurgitated fluid T insects that includes, among many others, (e.g., Calliphoridae, Micropezidae, and Muscidae). The black flies, fruit flies, horse flies, house flies, midges, adults of some groups are predaceous (e.g., Asilidae, and mosquitoes. The Diptera are among the most Empididae, and some Scathophagidae), whereas those diverse insect orders, with estimates of described of a few Diptera (e.g., Deuterophlebiidae and Oestridae) richness ranging from 120,000 to 150,000 species lack mouthparts completely, do not feed, and live for (Colless and McAlpine 1991, Schumann 1992, Brown onlyabrieftime. 2001, Merritt et al. 2003). Our world tally of more As holometabolous insects that undergo complete than 152,000 described species (Table 9.1) is based metamorphosis, the Diptera have a life cycle that primarily on figures extracted from the ‘BioSystematic includes a series of distinct stages or instars.